If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NYPost)   As long as the kids are away, judge says lesbian teachers can play in the classroom   (nypost.com) divider line 76
    More: Followup, Brooklyn's James Madison HS, language education, Brito, Alini Brito, United Federation of Teachers  
•       •       •

8045 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Mar 2014 at 12:16 PM (26 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



76 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2014-03-21 10:53:29 AM
That's a relief.  They were far too hot to be fired.
 
2014-03-21 11:10:58 AM
I guess this depends on what "partially undressed" means exactly.  Doesn't seem too unreasonable to fire somebody for farking in their place of business IMHO.

I'm not trying to make a "think of the children" argument here.  Your adult coworkers don't want to see it either.
/ Well, maybe in this case people would want to see it...
 
2014-03-21 11:42:11 AM
I'll be in my bunk the coat closet.
 
2014-03-21 11:42:13 AM

serial_crusher: I guess this depends on what "partially undressed" means exactly.  Doesn't seem too unreasonable to fire somebody for farking in their place of business IMHO.


From an earlier article:
But Brito believes the investigation into the incident at the school was flawed.
"I was not naked from the waist up," Brito said.
She claims that night she wasn't feeling well because she's hypoglycemic.
She says she and Mauro went to room 337 in the school so she could check her blood sugar.
Brito says she took her sweater off, revealing an undershirt and that Cindy Mauro then put the sweater under her head, and that was it.


Now, the hypoglycemia story may be false - apparently, they climbed six flights* of stairs to get to the classroom, according to another article - but there doesn't seem to be any more to the allegations than that they were lying on the floor and she had her shirt off, exposing her camisole.
That seems unreasonable for a firing, particularly if there were no other issues. If someone caught a heterosexual couple making out in an office after hours, I don't think anyone would be fired... the first time, at least.

*six flights, and room "337"? Try 3 flights with 3 midpoint landings, New York Post.
 
2014-03-21 11:59:29 AM
Lipstick lesbian exemption?
 
2014-03-21 12:20:24 PM
serial_crusher: I guess this depends on what "partially undressed" means exactly.  Doesn't seem too unreasonable to fire somebody for farking in their place of business IMHO.

I'm not trying to make a "think of the children" argument here.  Your adult coworkers don't want to see it either.
/ Well, maybe in this case people would want to see it...


The teachers claim that "topless" was a misrepresentation of changing an outer shirt while still wearing an undershirt.  As in anyone could do it in full view of others, without reprimand.
 
2014-03-21 12:21:31 PM
Was it a random classroom on the 3rd floor, or was it one of their classrooms?  The school board could go the route of out-of-bounds firing, meaning they had no reason to be where they were when they were there, but if it was one of their classrooms, shouldn't it be treated at they were in their office/work space because it was private until someone intruded?
 
2014-03-21 12:21:34 PM

vpb: That's a relief.  They were far too hot to be fired.


This!

I was dreading clicking that link. I was hoping for meh; but, those two are actually attractive.

/ lesbians! Why u no date hot girls? That's the whole point!
 
2014-03-21 12:22:51 PM
I think I saw that movie
 
2014-03-21 12:23:52 PM
Really?  If I had sex with a coworker in my office I would be fired before I could even blink.  Is it because they're an "oppressed class"?  Because they didn't include a 12-year old?

Seriously.  WTF?
 
2014-03-21 12:24:09 PM
Before I click the article, are we talking bull dykes or lipstick lesbians?
 
2014-03-21 12:25:08 PM
Giggity!
 
2014-03-21 12:25:32 PM
"Indeed, lesser penalties have been imposed where a teacher had an ongoing relationship or engaged in inappropriate behavior with a student,"

Seems logical to think that two adults hooking up is less of an offence than a teacher hooking up with a student, which in turn would require a less stiff punishment.
 
2014-03-21 12:25:44 PM

Metaluna Mutant: Before I click the article, are we talking bull dykes or lipstick lesbians?


You will be pleasantly surprised.
 
2014-03-21 12:25:56 PM
So heteros get canned for doing the nasty at work but lesbos get a pass?

/I'd give them a pass
/clarification- my penis
/more clarification- I'd sex them
 
2014-03-21 12:26:07 PM
So they were at a school event and not during school hours. Firing would be harsh, however they should face some sort of punishment.
 
2014-03-21 12:28:09 PM
George Costanza is asking for a review.
 
2014-03-21 12:28:50 PM
Sudents leave apples on teachers' desks; teachers leave snail trails on students' desks. The circle is complete.
 
2014-03-21 12:31:14 PM
I know if I was a student and saw this going on, I would pull a Pam

media.giphy.com
 
2014-03-21 12:32:06 PM
If I was caught making out at work, I would get fired
 
2014-03-21 12:32:23 PM
iruntheinternet.com
 
2014-03-21 12:32:33 PM
www.velosterturbo.org
 
2014-03-21 12:33:52 PM

Anayalator: [www.velosterturbo.org image 384x46]


Pics nothing!  I want the video.
 
2014-03-21 12:35:16 PM
The question, as always with the public, is how much dick was there?
0 dicks: hot
1 dick: Ok (unless it's mine, then awesome), but reprimand
2 dicks: fire them
>2 dicks: hang them

Americans - obsessed with dick (offer not valid for mine, apparently)
 
2014-03-21 12:35:16 PM

AngryDragon: Really?  If I had sex with a coworker in my office I would be fired before I could even blink.  Is it because they're an "oppressed class"?  Because they didn't include a 12-year old?

Seriously.  WTF?


They weren't having sex. They were making out while clothed. Big diff.
 
2014-03-21 12:39:06 PM

Theaetetus: serial_crusher: I guess this depends on what "partially undressed" means exactly.  Doesn't seem too unreasonable to fire somebody for farking in their place of business IMHO.

From an earlier article:
But Brito believes the investigation into the incident at the school was flawed.
"I was not naked from the waist up," Brito said.
She claims that night she wasn't feeling well because she's hypoglycemic.
She says she and Mauro went to room 337 in the school so she could check her blood sugar.
Brito says she took her sweater off, revealing an undershirt and that Cindy Mauro then put the sweater under her head, and that was it.

Now, the hypoglycemia story may be false - apparently, they climbed six flights* of stairs to get to the classroom, according to another article - but there doesn't seem to be any more to the allegations than that they were lying on the floor and she had her shirt off, exposing her camisole.
That seems unreasonable for a firing, particularly if there were no other issues. If someone caught a heterosexual couple making out in an office after hours, I don't think anyone would be fired... the first time, at least.

*six flights, and room "337"? Try 3 flights with 3 midpoint landings, New York Post.


Walk-up in a school? Whatever happened to gym ropes, fire house poles, and--Ohhhhhh. Fire house pole plus naked women equals stripper pole so they installed stairs. Eh, I don't know I'm not an architect.
 
2014-03-21 12:39:17 PM

mbillips: AngryDragon:
Seriously.  WTF?

They weren't having sex. They were making out while clothed. Big diff.


They were making out partially clothed. Big Diff.
 
2014-03-21 12:40:10 PM
If these women were only having sex with the students and not each other they would have been able to keep their jobs
 
2014-03-21 12:41:54 PM

vpb: That's a relief.  They were far too hot to be fired.


If you would hit, you must acquit.
 
2014-03-21 12:42:39 PM

Anayalator: [www.velosterturbo.org image 384x46]


tv.rightcelebrity.com

tv.rightcelebrity.com


I'd watch.
 
2014-03-21 12:44:36 PM
Come with me, lesbian teacher. Settle down and rest with me, fly with me lesbian teacher.
 
2014-03-21 12:45:43 PM
i1.ytimg.com
Was that wrong?
 
2014-03-21 12:46:56 PM
Friday F on F thread?
 
2014-03-21 12:49:34 PM

ikanreed: serial_crusher: I guess this depends on what "partially undressed" means exactly.  Doesn't seem too unreasonable to fire somebody for farking in their place of business IMHO.

I'm not trying to make a "think of the children" argument here.  Your adult coworkers don't want to see it either.
/ Well, maybe in this case people would want to see it...

The teachers claim that "topless" was a misrepresentation of changing an outer shirt while still wearing an undershirt.  As in anyone could do it in full view of others, without reprimand.


The article TFA refers to says they were "caught with their pants down -- literally", but I'm willing to assume a gross misuse of the word "literally" there.
 
2014-03-21 12:50:19 PM

mbillips: They weren't having sex. They were making out while clothed. Big diff


nunyadang: They were making out partially clothed. Big Diff


Where the hell do you two work?  If I was making out partially clothed with a co-worker, after hours, and IN THE OFFICE I would STILL be fired.
 
2014-03-21 12:52:40 PM
also I was really hoping this thread would have some examples of what "partially undressed" lesbians might look like.
 
2014-03-21 12:54:18 PM

AngryDragon: mbillips: They weren't having sex. They were making out while clothed. Big diff

nunyadang: They were making out partially clothed. Big Diff

Where the hell do you two work?  If I was making out partially clothed with a co-worker, after hours, and IN THE OFFICE I would STILL be fired.


There are some places where even farking at home away from work still would get you fired.
 
2014-03-21 12:55:37 PM
The next morning were the kids are asking, why does this toy smell all "fishy"?...
2.bp.blogspot.com
 
2014-03-21 12:56:22 PM

AngryDragon: mbillips: They weren't having sex. They were making out while clothed. Big diff

nunyadang: They were making out partially clothed. Big Diff

Where the hell do you two work?  If I was making out partially clothed with a co-worker, after hours, and IN THE OFFICE I would STILL be fired.


annnnnnd... do you think that's logical?
 
2014-03-21 12:56:44 PM
Wow. With "no tolerance" idiocy ruling the day in most schools this is surprising. And hot.
 
2014-03-21 12:58:11 PM

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Anayalator: [www.velosterturbo.org image 384x46]






I'd watch.


Watch? I'd participate to the extent allowed.
 
2014-03-21 12:58:44 PM
Source:
NY Post

So I assume this "story" is 100% bullshiat.
 
2014-03-21 01:00:06 PM

mbillips: AngryDragon: Really?  If I had sex with a coworker in my office I would be fired before I could even blink.  Is it because they're an "oppressed class"?  Because they didn't include a 12-year old?

Seriously.  WTF?

They weren't having sex. They were making out while clothed. Big diff.


Get out of here.
We are trying to get outraged here.
I love the comments on the article ranting about libs.
DURRRRP
 
2014-03-21 01:00:24 PM

AngryDragon: mbillips: They weren't having sex. They were making out while clothed. Big diff

nunyadang: They were making out partially clothed. Big Diff

Where the hell do you two work?  If I was making out partially clothed with a co-worker, after hours, and IN THE OFFICE I would STILL be fired.


At my old job you would probably have to bang a donkey to get fired there. At my new job you could probably blow a kiss and get fired at some worksites.
 
2014-03-21 01:00:27 PM
They didn't rule that it was acceptable behavior.

They ruled that for the circumstances, firing was too significant a punishment for a first offense.
 
2014-03-21 01:00:45 PM

serial_crusher: also I was really hoping this thread would have some examples of what "partially undressed" lesbians might look like.


img.fark.net

img.fark.net

img.fark.net

Life is not Cinemax.
 
2014-03-21 01:02:33 PM

AngryDragon: mbillips: They weren't having sex. They were making out while clothed. Big diff

nunyadang: They were making out partially clothed. Big Diff

Where the hell do you two work?  If I was making out partially clothed with a co-worker, after hours, and IN THE OFFICE I would STILL be fired.


I wouldn't.
Especially since several people in our office are married or dating.
But if I was fired, it would definitely not be a criminal act.
Also if I was in a contract/union, it would have to violate some defined rule to get fired.
 
2014-03-21 01:06:20 PM

DerAppie: "Indeed, lesser penalties have been imposed where a teacher had an ongoing relationship or engaged in inappropriate behavior with a student,"

Seems logical to think that two adults hooking up is less of an offence than a teacher hooking up with a student, which in turn would require a less stiff punishment.


from the comments here, it sounds like in regards to these two, many punishments are being imposed on stiff things...
 
2014-03-21 01:06:55 PM

Anayalator: [www.velosterturbo.org image 384x46]


agreed
 
2014-03-21 01:12:14 PM
i215.photobucket.com
 
Displayed 50 of 76 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report