Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(KSL Salt Lake City)   Smoking hot blogger, calligrapher and proud mother of two fights back after finding her image on 'revenge porn' website, receiving emails from men across the world propositioning her for sex (w/pics)   (ksl.com ) divider line
    More: Interesting, Salt Lake County, porn sites, smoking  
•       •       •

29475 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Mar 2014 at 5:11 PM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



103 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2014-03-15 05:13:34 PM  
TTIWWOP ;)
 
2014-03-15 05:14:29 PM  
mormoms
 
2014-03-15 05:15:38 PM  
Blindly clicks on link.......pleasantly surprised.


/off to cliphunter
 
2014-03-15 05:15:54 PM  
I wish she could esplin where the photos came from
 
2014-03-15 05:16:36 PM  
he husband looks like a skinnier ted cruz.
 
2014-03-15 05:16:37 PM  
Um...

Isn't it against the rules or something to say that the news story subject is smoking hot and then have her actually be smoking hot?

Someone fetch the site rules...
 
2014-03-15 05:16:48 PM  
'fark you, biatch, I posted that shiat on the internet' is one thing, but real name and contact info? Not so much
 
2014-03-15 05:17:20 PM  
She is average with nice eyes and decent hair.

"Smoking hot" is not a synonym for "Under 120 lbs."
 
2014-03-15 05:17:46 PM  

abfalter: Um...

Isn't it against the rules or something to say that the news story subject is smoking hot and then have her actually be smoking hot?

Someone fetch the site rules...


That rule is for British women only
 
2014-03-15 05:19:14 PM  
she has kids, so you know she puts out.
 
2014-03-15 05:19:26 PM  
Looks like the site works.  Someone got their revenge.
 
2014-03-15 05:19:33 PM  
Okay, my Band of Fark Brothers... links to the good stuff!
 
2014-03-15 05:19:45 PM  
Low standards subby, albeit I admit she earns points for not being overweight in this  country of ours.
 
2014-03-15 05:20:49 PM  
This thread is now Studmen.
 
2014-03-15 05:23:17 PM  
Can we stop pretending "blogger" is an occupation?
 
2014-03-15 05:24:22 PM  
Subby is not helping by calling her smoking hot.
 
2014-03-15 05:25:43 PM  

Anonymous Bosch: She is average with nice eyes and decent hair.

"Smoking hot" is not a synonym for "Under 120 lbs."


With what we have been stuck with in the past, it is.
 
2014-03-15 05:26:29 PM  
Moral of the story:  Don't internet.
 
2014-03-15 05:29:46 PM  
i.imgur.com

But which one?!  I mean there are SO many!
 
2014-03-15 05:30:03 PM  
If by smoking "smoking hot" you mean "boner killer" than you are correct.

Standards, subby. Yours are low.
 
2014-03-15 05:30:34 PM  

b0rg9: Moral of the story:  Don't internet.


Wrong. Don't piss people off while internetting, and have personal information available.

/I should probably take that advice, but.... fark you.
 
2014-03-15 05:30:40 PM  
"someone had copied her appropriate online photos and posted them next to sexually explicit images of another woman. Next to the photos were her full name, the city she lives in and her contact information."

Her photos were not sexual.
 
2014-03-15 05:30:49 PM  
She's pretty damn cute.
 
2014-03-15 05:30:50 PM  
POGTFO.
 
2014-03-15 05:30:55 PM  
I didn't realize that Studman69 had so many alts.
 
2014-03-15 05:31:13 PM  
"Take them down". That's cute. The internet doesn't work that way.
 
2014-03-15 05:31:51 PM  
what does KSL stand for ?

Kissing Sweet Lesbians?
 
2014-03-15 05:32:03 PM  
The messages alerted Esplin that her photos were posted on a revenge porn website where someone had copied her appropriate online photos and posted them next to sexually explicit images of another woman.

Um... How is that supposed to work?
 
2014-03-15 05:32:46 PM  
From the head shot, I'd hit it
 
2014-03-15 05:34:07 PM  
I didn't see the part where she fights back.
 
2014-03-15 05:35:01 PM  

Amish Tech Support: "someone had copied her appropriate online photos and posted them next to sexually explicit images of another woman....Her photos were not sexual.


upload.wikimedia.org
 
2014-03-15 05:35:01 PM  
She's not so bad looking. Also, good luck on the getting your pictures off of that site, sweetie. She should probably move, change phones, and emails if she wants the madness to end.

/ never pay someone who is extorting you
 
2014-03-15 05:35:52 PM  

fusillade762: The messages alerted Esplin that her photos were posted on a revenge porn website where someone had copied her appropriate online photos and posted them next to sexually explicit images of another woman.

Um... How is that supposed to work?



img.fark.net

yes, she has a long neck
 
2014-03-15 05:42:17 PM  

fusillade762: The messages alerted Esplin that her photos were posted on a revenge porn website where someone had copied her appropriate online photos and posted them next to sexually explicit images of another woman.

Um... How is that supposed to work?


It's not, legally. IIRC, facebook got either sued or at least in hot water when they briefly decided to use random members' facebook photos to sell unrelated or unendorsed products..
 
2014-03-15 05:44:14 PM  
Probably the SysAdmin for EuroDNS is sitting in a tank, relaxing after voting in Sebastopol, and feeling a little homesick for read Russia.
 
2014-03-15 05:44:20 PM  
Here's a link to the revenge porn site she's on with her pics.  It's really not even that bad, and safe for work.

http://goo.gl/zPOD
 
2014-03-15 05:46:48 PM  

topcon: Here's a link to the revenge porn site she's on with her pics.  It's really not even that bad, and safe for work.

http://goo.gl/zPOD


Thanks for posting.
 
2014-03-15 05:49:07 PM  

daveb0rg: I didn't see the part where she fights back.


There's a part where she wrestles another woman, while wearing lingerie, and then, you know what happens and then there's toys.
 
2014-03-15 05:49:18 PM  
Men are coonts.
 
2014-03-15 05:50:47 PM  
I meant to say conths.
 
2014-03-15 05:52:18 PM  

topcon: Here's a link to the revenge porn site she's on with her pics.  It's really not even that bad, and safe for work.

http://goo.gl/zPOD


I give her a 7/10.  Would definitely bang the 'ironic' glasses off her face.
 
2014-03-15 05:53:04 PM  

techgeek07: She's pretty damn cute.


Two kids.  Give her the "Certified MILF" card, now.
 
2014-03-15 05:53:27 PM  
 <<< Here's a link to the revenge porn site she's on with her pics.  It's really not even that bad, and safe for work.

http://goo.gl/zPOD" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://goo.gl/zPOD >>>

When will I learn.... when ? ;)
 
2014-03-15 05:53:28 PM  

topcon: Here's a link to the revenge porn site she's on with her pics.  It's really not even that bad, and safe for work.

http://goo.gl/zPOD


It doesn't really work with the ads.
 
2014-03-15 05:55:54 PM  
I'm outside and can't erll
 
2014-03-15 05:56:30 PM  

topcon: Here's a link to the revenge porn site she's on with her pics.  It's really not even that bad, and safe for work.

http://goo.gl/zPOD


2008 called and wants its meme back.
 
2014-03-15 05:56:58 PM  
$400 to take the photos down?  I would think one could hire a hitman in the Phillippines for a lot less than that.
 
2014-03-15 06:05:46 PM  
The pics were taken down? maybe once you get onto such a site they start multiplying.

2 rather easy to find sites that are still up.

NSFW http://www.myex.com/utah/draper/melissa-esplin/14500/
NSFW http://mycollectionofyourwife.tumblr.com/post/79367056664/wildwebwive s displayed-melissa-esplin-draper
 
2014-03-15 06:05:58 PM  
It's not like there aren't laws for this.  Fraud, slander, defamation, conspiracy harassment, etc.

We just really need to get the legal precedents in place to establish which laws apply to the internet and how, and deal with the necessary cross-jurisdictional bullshiat efficiently.  Basically we need to build a set of standard legal and electronic tools so that the law can take advantage of the same ease of national communication that's currently being used to make applying existing law impractical.

The essence of it is that we need to find some way to give a court in county A, state B automatic jurisdiction on information loaded from or relevant to A, B even if it's stored on a server in C, D and posted from an ISP in E, F.  And somehow do it without opening up the poor ISPs to every po-dunk legal harassment district being able to leverage it to stop their operations at a whim or take unrelated info.  Restore the age of specific-item recovery warrants, maybe?

// Anyhow, not a lawyer, so can't help anyone with the solution, just trying to define the problem here and why we still haven't fixed it after 10 years of this shiat.
 
2014-03-15 06:11:47 PM  

Jim_Callahan: It's not like there aren't laws for this. Fraud, slander, defamation, conspiracy harassment, etc.


There are no enforceable laws for this, the sites are hosted overseas.
 
Displayed 50 of 103 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report