Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Tampa Bay Online)   Remember the guy who shot another man in a Florida movie theater for texting during the previews? New records show the shooter was texting, too   (tbo.com) divider line 28
    More: Followup, lone survivor, mandatory minimums, Chad Oulson, Matthew Myers  
•       •       •

5103 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Mar 2014 at 5:25 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2014-03-13 05:21:33 PM  
4 votes:

meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!


0-media-cdn.foolz.us
2014-03-13 05:12:50 PM  
4 votes:
Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!
2014-03-13 06:02:28 PM  
3 votes:

meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!


s9.postimg.org
2014-03-13 05:41:47 PM  
3 votes:
Reactions that are equal, or nearly equal to that of having a cell phone thrown at you:

Throwing a cell phone back
Throwing popcorn
Throwing a shoe
Yelling at them and threatening to call the police

Reactions that are not anywhere near equal to that of having a cell phone thrown at you:

Shooting the person
Stabbing the person
Tazing the person
Macing the person
Doing anything lethal to the person
Force them to watch Pootie Tang
2014-03-13 05:41:23 PM  
3 votes:

scottydoesntknow: meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!

[0-media-cdn.foolz.us image 526x300]


Google Translate is apparently ridiculously drunk right now.
2014-03-13 05:39:42 PM  
3 votes:

Kit Fister: Damn, I was hoping he'd left.


No I have the belief he is still in prison which is what the story of this is about have you not done the reading or perhaps the first language of you is not the English.
2014-03-13 05:38:35 PM  
3 votes:
IDK, my BFF Zimmerman?
2014-03-13 06:03:24 PM  
2 votes:

meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!


I might as well quote you too.
Maybe Drew will see your popularity and hire you for Fark TV.
2014-03-13 05:57:56 PM  
2 votes:

meow said the dog: Vexed Thespian: someone who is trying way to hard to be pocket ninja, I noticed it in another thread earlier this week.

LAUGHTER OL I have the hope that you are doing the kidding and are not this much of the stupid thing. Now who do you feel is the right person and the wrong person in the shooting of this?


how hard do you have to work at having grammar that poor?
do you crank out a paragraph or sentence - then proof it for making TOO much sense or not sounding autistic enough?
2014-03-13 05:32:07 PM  
2 votes:
So a (retired)cop shot someone for breaking a rule that he believes himself to be exempt from?

Sounds about right.
2014-03-13 05:29:43 PM  
2 votes:
Maybe he saw that the other guy just got the same sext from a teenage girl as him and he flew into a jealous rage.
2014-03-13 10:24:10 PM  
1 votes:
Anyone who brings a gun into a movie theater is a coward and a danger to society.

What the hell is wrong with gun nuts? Biggest pussies on the planet.
2014-03-13 07:10:17 PM  
1 votes:

cretinbob: The Southern Dandy: Why is that limited to civilians? Shouldn't that say "A person..." ?

Because LEO need their weapons


LEOs are civilians.
2014-03-13 06:36:41 PM  
1 votes:
jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.

www.clevescene.com www.clevescene.com www.clevescene.com www.clevescene.com www.clevescene.com

That should be the question that determines whether someone gets a handgun permit not.
2014-03-13 06:33:51 PM  
1 votes:
Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired. They say Reeves acted in self-defense.

They pull a phone, you pull a gun.  That's the Wesley Chapel way.
2014-03-13 06:30:59 PM  
1 votes:

Wadded Beef: So you're saying the shooter's a dick.


Angry Middle Age White Guy Syndrome.
2014-03-13 06:28:29 PM  
1 votes:
2.bp.blogspot.com
2014-03-13 06:22:02 PM  
1 votes:

jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.


Bill Hicks had a good way of determining who should have a gun: "Do you want to own a gun, yes or no? If you said yes, you don't deserve to own a gun."
2014-03-13 06:08:56 PM  
1 votes:
I initially felt that movie texters get what they deserve, I suppose for the sake of consistency, we should just shoot this guy too.
2014-03-13 06:01:59 PM  
1 votes:
FTFA: "Reeves remains in the Land O' Lakes jail with no bond."

The creamiest, most delicious jail ever.
2014-03-13 05:58:18 PM  
1 votes:

meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!


Heya Meow! Howzit going? Good to see you again! We are counting on your cogent and reasoned discourse on this matter, as we always do.

/laughter OL
2014-03-13 05:47:17 PM  
1 votes:

buttcat: Callous: jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.

Good thing this guy was a cop then.

I thought he was a retired cop...which now makes him a civilian.


Actually cops are civilians, retired or not.  I guess you believe we should disarm the police.
2014-03-13 05:45:28 PM  
1 votes:

jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.


Police officers are civilians as are retired police officers.
2014-03-13 05:42:24 PM  
1 votes:

Vexed Thespian: someone who is trying way to hard to be pocket ninja, I noticed it in another thread earlier this week.


LAUGHTER OL I have the hope that you are doing the kidding and are not this much of the stupid thing. Now who do you feel is the right person and the wrong person in the shooting of this?
2014-03-13 05:37:12 PM  
1 votes:
A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.
2014-03-13 05:35:02 PM  
1 votes:
Sure, but if the dead guy is black then everything's okay right?
2014-03-13 05:31:13 PM  
1 votes:

factoryconnection: He also shot someone over a texting dispute!


This.

Does calling him a hypocrite really matter at this point?  He killed someone.
2014-03-13 05:30:10 PM  
1 votes:
"WTF Y IS THIS GUY IN FRONT OF ME TXTING?"

"BRB GOTTA SHOOT THIS FARKER"
 
Displayed 28 of 28 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report