If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Tampa Bay Online)   Remember the guy who shot another man in a Florida movie theater for texting during the previews? New records show the shooter was texting, too   (tbo.com) divider line 129
    More: Followup, lone survivor, mandatory minimums, Chad Oulson, Matthew Myers  
•       •       •

5081 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Mar 2014 at 5:25 PM (23 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



129 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-03-13 08:09:58 PM

factoryconnection: He also shot someone over a texting dispute!


Actually, he shot someone who threw something at him I a dark theater. It's weird how people keep forgetting that detail.
 
2014-03-13 08:13:28 PM

Mikey1969: factoryconnection: He also shot someone over a texting dispute!

Actually, he shot someone who threw something at him I a dark theater. It's weird how people keep forgetting that detail.


Yeah, popcorn. Popcorn dude. It's funny how some people keep trying to forget that detail and act like he was throwing knives and ninja stars at him.
 
2014-03-13 08:27:29 PM

Mikey1969: factoryconnection: He also shot someone over a texting dispute!

Actually, he shot someone who threw something at him I a dark theater. It's weird how people keep forgetting that detail.


Yes, if you focus solely on the details and forget everything else that would be good.
 
2014-03-13 08:28:58 PM

elguerodiablo: Vexed Thespian: scottydoesntknow: meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!

[0-media-cdn.foolz.us image 526x300]

someone who is trying way to hard to be pocket ninja, I noticed it in another thread earlier this week.

meow has been here for years.



He's been annoying for just as long.
 
2014-03-13 08:57:07 PM

ongbok: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: Callous: Sounds about right.

Ex-cops are allowed to throw cellphones at the elderly in Florida?

FTA, "Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired.  "

This is something for the retards in this thread, yes you are retards.
Having popcorn thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having a cellphone thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody snatch popcorn out of your hand does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody disrespect you does not justify shooting somebody.
If you even try to argue any of that you are a retard plane and simple, and none of your opinions are valid.

Then get the law changed unless you are too retarded. Clearly it should be easy to get the elderly to give up the ability  to prevent a felonious act.

Once again, can I throw a cell phone at you at close range. I promise I will not aim for your eyes. You don't need them anyway, right. Can I throw one at your grandparents while in a rage?

The guy didn't throw a cell phone at anyone. He threw the guy's popcorn in his face. Watch the surveillance film, he snatched the guy's popcorn and threw it in his face.

And even if he did throw a cellphone, shooting somebody in response isn't a proper response, unless you are a retarded coward.


Says the non-elderly person. Ever wonder why it's law in Florida not to assault or commit battery on the elderly in Florida. Don't do it. It's pretty easy. I posted the law upthread in case you can't find it, Mr. Manley-stud Man.
 
2014-03-13 09:00:04 PM

HotWingConspiracy: brainiac-dumdum: StoPPeRmobile: Callous: Sounds about right.

Ex-cops are allowed to throw cellphones at the elderly in Florida?

FTA, "Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired.  "

No, a tossed cell phone is not a reason to shoot someone. What kind of pussy would even consider such a response?

Down there you're allowed to murder people as long as you say you were scared.


Works for cops all over the nations. Why not for the elderly. They paid their dues. Don't fark with them. The law protects them. Just like women, gheys, and children. Get it through your heads.

Stay out of Florida!
 
2014-03-13 09:02:36 PM

ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: Callous: Sounds about right.

Ex-cops are allowed to throw cellphones at the elderly in Florida?

FTA, "Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired.  "

This is something for the retards in this thread, yes you are retards.
Having popcorn thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having a cellphone thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody snatch popcorn out of your hand does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody disrespect you does not justify shooting somebody.
If you even try to argue any of that you are a retard plane and simple, and none of your opinions are valid.

Then get the law changed unless you are too retarded. Clearly it should be easy to get the elderly to give up the ability  to prevent a felonious act.

Once again, can I throw a cell phone at you at close range. I promise I will not aim for your eyes. You don't need them anyway, right. Can I throw one at your grandparents while in a rage?

The guy didn't throw a cell phone at anyone. He threw the guy's popcorn in his face. Watch the surveillance film, he snatched the guy's popcorn and threw it in his face.


I'll wait for the trial to find out about the glowing popcorn.


FTA, again,"A surveillance video played during Reeves' second bond hearing in February shows the small flash of an object going toward Reeves.

Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired. They say Reeves acted in self-defense."

 
2014-03-13 09:07:13 PM
This guy will be a Fark hero before too long.

Awesome.
 
2014-03-13 09:18:08 PM

StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: Callous: Sounds about right.

Ex-cops are allowed to throw cellphones at the elderly in Florida?

FTA, "Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired.  "

This is something for the retards in this thread, yes you are retards.
Having popcorn thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having a cellphone thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody snatch popcorn out of your hand does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody disrespect you does not justify shooting somebody.
If you even try to argue any of that you are a retard plane and simple, and none of your opinions are valid.

Then get the law changed unless you are too retarded. Clearly it should be easy to get the elderly to give up the ability  to prevent a felonious act.

Once again, can I throw a cell phone at you at close range. I promise I will not aim for your eyes. You don't need them anyway, right. Can I throw one at your grandparents while in a rage?

The guy didn't throw a cell phone at anyone. He threw the guy's popcorn in his face. Watch the surveillance film, he snatched the guy's popcorn and threw it in his face.

I'll wait for the trial to find out about the glowing popcorn.
FTA, again,"A surveillance video played during Reeves' second bond hearing in February shows the small flash of an object going toward Reeves.

Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired. They say Reeves acted in self-defense."


Funny how Mr. Reeves never said anything about the guy throwing a cellphone at him in his initial statement. That would have been the first thing I claimed was thrown at me and not popcorn.

And if you watched the video you can clearly see his hand snatch his popcorn away from him and then him throwing it at him. The only flash on the tape that could be seen was clearly the guy's hand, and if you ever saw video taken in the dark you would know things glow like that because light is reflecting off of them.
 
2014-03-13 09:56:03 PM

ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: Callous: Sounds about right.

Ex-cops are allowed to throw cellphones at the elderly in Florida?

FTA, "Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired.  "

This is something for the retards in this thread, yes you are retards.
Having popcorn thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having a cellphone thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody snatch popcorn out of your hand does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody disrespect you does not justify shooting somebody.
If you even try to argue any of that you are a retard plane and simple, and none of your opinions are valid.

Then get the law changed unless you are too retarded. Clearly it should be easy to get the elderly to give up the ability  to prevent a felonious act.

Once again, can I throw a cell phone at you at close range. I promise I will not aim for your eyes. You don't need them anyway, right. Can I throw one at your grandparents while in a rage?

The guy didn't throw a cell phone at anyone. He threw the guy's popcorn in his face. Watch the surveillance film, he snatched the guy's popcorn and threw it in his face.

I'll wait for the trial to find out about the glowing popcorn.
FTA, again,"A surveillance video played during Reeves' second bond hearing in February shows the small flash of an object going toward Reeves.

Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired. They say Reeves acted in self-defense."

Funny how Mr. Reeves never said anything about the guy throwing a cellphone at him in his initial statement. That would have been the first thing I claimed was thrown at me and not popcorn.

And if you watched the video you can clearly see his hand snatch his popcorn away from him and then him throwing it at him. The only flash on the tape that could be seen was clearly the guy's han ...


That's the reason for the trial. Plus the guy is in jail so he doesn't off himself. All the speculation seems nuts to me.

But the fact stands that assault or battery on the elderly, in Florida, can be a felony. Your allowed to stop a felony committed upon you in Florida it appears.

Come on down and change the law. Just don't cry about the heat in June. Doesn't get hot here until the middle of August.
 
2014-03-13 10:01:29 PM

redmid17: cretinbob: The Southern Dandy: Why is that limited to civilians? Shouldn't that say "A person..." ?

Because LEO need their weapons

LEOs are civilians.


no
 
2014-03-13 10:15:13 PM

StoPPeRmobile: That's the reason for the trial. Plus the guy is in jail so he doesn't off himself. All the speculation seems nuts to me.

But the fact stands that assault or battery on the elderly, in Florida, can be a felony. Your allowed to stop a felony committed upon you in Florida it appears.

Come on down and change the law. Just don't cry about the heat in June. Doesn't get hot here until the middle of August.


Lets play it your way. He threw the popcorn on him, ok felony. That was one action and it had stopped. He wasn't continuing, so there wasn't any felony for the guy to stop from being committed on him. What he did was avenge a felony, or what ever, that was committed against him.
 
2014-03-13 10:24:10 PM
Anyone who brings a gun into a movie theater is a coward and a danger to society.

What the hell is wrong with gun nuts? Biggest pussies on the planet.
 
2014-03-13 10:36:41 PM

cretinbob: redmid17: cretinbob: The Southern Dandy: Why is that limited to civilians? Shouldn't that say "A person..." ?

Because LEO need their weapons

LEOs are civilians.

no


Yes
 
2014-03-13 10:53:51 PM

ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: That's the reason for the trial. Plus the guy is in jail so he doesn't off himself. All the speculation seems nuts to me.

But the fact stands that assault or battery on the elderly, in Florida, can be a felony. Your allowed to stop a felony committed upon you in Florida it appears.

Come on down and change the law. Just don't cry about the heat in June. Doesn't get hot here until the middle of August.

Lets play it your way. He threw the popcorn on him, ok felony. That was one action and it had stopped. He wasn't continuing, so there wasn't any felony for the guy to stop from being committed on him. What he did was avenge a felony, or what ever, that was committed against him.


It appears that the defense's argument will be that the guy posed a threat again while throwing and raging at an elderly person. To be honest it seems like the guy talked more than he needed to and that might hang him. If he just said he was in fear for his life he would walk, in Florida.

Florida seems to be taking a stand on bullying our elders. I don't have a problem with that.
 
2014-03-13 11:05:51 PM

StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: Callous: Sounds about right.

Ex-cops are allowed to throw cellphones at the elderly in Florida?

FTA, "Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired.  "

This is something for the retards in this thread, yes you are retards.
Having popcorn thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having a cellphone thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody snatch popcorn out of your hand does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody disrespect you does not justify shooting somebody.
If you even try to argue any of that you are a retard plane and simple, and none of your opinions are valid.

Then get the law changed unless you are too retarded. Clearly it should be easy to get the elderly to give up the ability  to prevent a felonious act.

Once again, can I throw a cell phone at you at close range. I promise I will not aim for your eyes. You don't need them anyway, right. Can I throw one at your grandparents while in a rage?


the old man was pointing a gun at the guy.
 
2014-03-13 11:08:22 PM

Mikey1969: factoryconnection: He also shot someone over a texting dispute!

Actually, he shot someone who threw something at him I a dark theater. It's weird how people keep forgetting that detail.


He was threatening a man with a gun, and then murdered the poor schlep when a cell phone was thrown at him.
 
2014-03-13 11:09:50 PM

ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: That's the reason for the trial. Plus the guy is in jail so he doesn't off himself. All the speculation seems nuts to me.

But the fact stands that assault or battery on the elderly, in Florida, can be a felony. Your allowed to stop a felony committed upon you in Florida it appears.

Come on down and change the law. Just don't cry about the heat in June. Doesn't get hot here until the middle of August.

Lets play it your way. He threw the popcorn on him, ok felony. That was one action and it had stopped. He wasn't continuing, so there wasn't any felony for the guy to stop from being committed on him. What he did was avenge a felony, or what ever, that was committed against him.


Throwing popcorn is not assault or battery. It just isn't there has never been a case of assault with popcorn. It just wouldn't happen.
 
2014-03-13 11:11:21 PM

StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: Callous: Sounds about right.

Ex-cops are allowed to throw cellphones at the elderly in Florida?

FTA, "Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired.  "

This is something for the retards in this thread, yes you are retards.
Having popcorn thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having a cellphone thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody snatch popcorn out of your hand does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody disrespect you does not justify shooting somebody.
If you even try to argue any of that you are a retard plane and simple, and none of your opinions are valid.

Then get the law changed unless you are too retarded. Clearly it should be easy to get the elderly to give up the ability  to prevent a felonious act.

Once again, can I throw a cell phone at you at close range. I promise I will not aim for your eyes. You don't need them anyway, right. Can I throw one at your grandparents while in a rage?

The guy didn't throw a cell phone at anyone. He threw the guy's popcorn in his face. Watch the surveillance film, he snatched the guy's popcorn and threw it in his face.

I'll wait for the trial to find out about the glowing popcorn.
FTA, again,"A surveillance video played during Reeves' second bond hearing in February shows the small flash of an object going toward Reeves.

Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired. They say Reeves acted in self-defense."

Funny how Mr. Reeves never said anything about the guy throwing a cellphone at him in his initial statement. That would have been the first thing I claimed was thrown at me and not popcorn.

And if you watched the video you can clearly see his hand snatch his popcorn away from him and then him throwing it at him. The only flash on the tape that could be seen was clearly the g ...


^

farking Drama Queen.
 
2014-03-13 11:55:30 PM

StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: ongbok: StoPPeRmobile: Callous: Sounds about right.

Ex-cops are allowed to throw cellphones at the elderly in Florida?

FTA, "Reeves' attorneys claim that was the glow from a cellphone Oulson threw at Reeves before the shot was fired.  "

This is something for the retards in this thread, yes you are retards.
Having popcorn thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having a cellphone thrown at you does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody snatch popcorn out of your hand does not justify shooting somebody.
Having somebody disrespect you does not justify shooting somebody.
If you even try to argue any of that you are a retard plane and simple, and none of your opinions are valid.

Then get the law changed unless you are too retarded. Clearly it should be easy to get the elderly to give up the ability  to prevent a felonious act.

Once again, can I throw a cell phone at you at close range. I promise I will not aim for your eyes. You don't need them anyway, right. Can I throw one at your grandparents while in a rage?

The guy didn't throw a cell phone at anyone. He threw the guy's popcorn in his face. Watch the surveillance film, he snatched the guy's popcorn and threw it in his face.

And even if he did throw a cellphone, shooting somebody in response isn't a proper response, unless you are a retarded coward.

Says the non-elderly person. Ever wonder why it's law in Florida not to assault or commit battery on the elderly in Florida. Don't do it. It's pretty easy. I posted the law upthread in case you can't find it, Mr. Manley-stud Man.


I'm pretty sure it's illegal to commit assault and battery on anyone, not just the elderly.  Also it's not legal to shoot someone doe assault and battery unless you have reason the believe that battery could result in death or serious bodily harm.  Thrown popcorn and cell phones have never killed anyone.
 
2014-03-14 01:28:20 AM
How come everyone that wants to defend the ex-cop and harp on the popcorn being thrown forgets that the ex-cop escalated the issue by verbally confronting the other person, violating the law by bringing a weapon into a building with a large and clear sign stating  NO WEAPONS, and  KICKING the seat the other person was in.


Remember private locations can restrict gun usage on their property.


If you want to apply stand your ground then apply it to the initial victim, the person that ended up being killed by the aggressor.  It clearly was stated in the police report Reeves kicked Oulson's chair, demanded the phone be put away, was informed that the text was in regard to a preschooler, left in a huft to get a manager, failed at convincing anyone that this was a serious crime, came back alone as clearly texting during a preview is not the same offense as texting during the movie.

Just be glad that Reeve's gun was jammed as who knows how many more shots would of been used to defend his life against popcorn.
 
2014-03-14 01:34:01 AM
FloriDUH
 
2014-03-14 02:06:53 AM
Wasn't William Petit's entire family murdered in the suburbs?


Ask William Petit if he thinks people should be armed in the 'burbs.
 
2014-03-14 07:28:10 AM

Dutch Pilsner: elguerodiablo: Vexed Thespian: scottydoesntknow: meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!

[0-media-cdn.foolz.us image 526x300]

someone who is trying way to hard to be pocket ninja, I noticed it in another thread earlier this week.

meow has been here for years.

And definitely has a different schtick than PN.



Yes. PN makes really good funny trolls. You know it's a troll, but it's a damn funny one. Meow is a functional lunatic. I can't remember, but I think taking a paragraph and running it through every language google translate will do before turning it back into English is fairly new. I seem to recall much earlier posts being in correct English structure, but being no less hard to read due to sheer lunacy.

It was like reading from the Book of Eternal Madness, where every page would drag you further into insanity.
i1134.photobucket.com
Like characters 4 and 5 found out...
 
2014-03-14 10:50:41 AM

meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!


ESL or LSD?
 
2014-03-14 02:12:19 PM

ongbok: Mikey1969: factoryconnection: He also shot someone over a texting dispute!

Actually, he shot someone who threw something at him I a dark theater. It's weird how people keep forgetting that detail.

Yeah, popcorn. Popcorn dude. It's funny how some people keep trying to forget that detail and act like he was throwing knives and ninja stars at him.


Missed the whole "dark" part of my statement, I see.
 
2014-03-14 04:43:20 PM
Initially, my outrage was due to the fact that this asshole got upset due to texting during the farking previews.  No one likes sitting through those anyways....they're previews FFS!!!!  But now, to hear that he shot that poor man for doing the same exact thing he himself was doing.....send him to Utah and let him face the firing squads.  (And actually, from what I heard on the local news, the guy who got shot was texting with his babysitter and the shooter was simply texting his son who was also attending the movie with him.  IMO, texting your babysitter takes a higher rank than telling your son that you are already in the theatre and are seated.)

IMO, we have a retired cop who is power hungry and thinks he is the law.  My parents live in Pasco County, not terribly far from this movie theatre.  They are senior citizens (who isn't here in Floriduh?).  I worry constantly.

/not a fan of hypocrites
//WTF is going on with Meow Said the Dog--brain damage or language barrier?
 
2014-03-15 12:36:57 AM
This guy knew his son was on the way and his son is a freaking cop. Why not wait for his son?

He was known by the theater for complaining about texting. Showing his motive and that he was already aggressive about the behavior.

The guy got shot for being a dick. If being a dick was a death sentence fark and most of the world would cease to exist.

I am not excusing the guy being a dick, but seriously as an ex-cop that lead SWAT you would think the guy would have known not to shoot in a theater.

I work with the elderly all day on their computers, I know how quickly some can swing from happy to bitterly angry over something very trivial. I am not saying that is what went down, I am just saying I saw a 70 year old man snap a $1700 dollar laptop over the corner of our counter simply because his email would not send and receive.

So the idea that some old ex-cop felt cuckolded in a theater and decided to finally "do something about it" is not that far fetched.
 
2014-03-15 03:24:20 AM

thiefofdreams: This guy knew his son was on the way and his son is a freaking cop. Why not wait for his son?

He was known by the theater for complaining about texting. Showing his motive and that he was already aggressive about the behavior.

The guy got shot for being a dick. If being a dick was a death sentence fark and most of the world would cease to exist.

I am not excusing the guy being a dick, but seriously as an ex-cop that lead SWAT you would think the guy would have known not to shoot in a theater.

I work with the elderly all day on their computers, I know how quickly some can swing from happy to bitterly angry over something very trivial. I am not saying that is what went down, I am just saying I saw a 70 year old man snap a $1700 dollar laptop over the corner of our counter simply because his email would not send and receive.

So the idea that some old ex-cop felt cuckolded in a theater and decided to finally "do something about it" is not that far fetched.



media.tumblr.com
 
Displayed 29 of 129 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report