If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Tampa Bay Online)   Remember the guy who shot another man in a Florida movie theater for texting during the previews? New records show the shooter was texting, too   (tbo.com) divider line 129
    More: Followup, lone survivor, mandatory minimums, Chad Oulson, Matthew Myers  
•       •       •

5080 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Mar 2014 at 5:25 PM (18 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



129 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-03-13 03:52:03 PM
He also shot someone over a texting dispute!
 
2014-03-13 03:53:22 PM
Ya, movee iz cool bro and my grrl iz hot dawg but OW JST BN SHOT call ambulance kthxbye
 
2014-03-13 05:12:19 PM
Oh good grief.
 
2014-03-13 05:12:50 PM
Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!
 
2014-03-13 05:21:33 PM

meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!


0-media-cdn.foolz.us
 
2014-03-13 05:29:43 PM
Maybe he saw that the other guy just got the same sext from a teenage girl as him and he flew into a jealous rage.
 
2014-03-13 05:30:10 PM
"WTF Y IS THIS GUY IN FRONT OF ME TXTING?"

"BRB GOTTA SHOOT THIS FARKER"
 
2014-03-13 05:31:13 PM

factoryconnection: He also shot someone over a texting dispute!


This.

Does calling him a hypocrite really matter at this point?  He killed someone.
 
2014-03-13 05:32:07 PM
So a (retired)cop shot someone for breaking a rule that he believes himself to be exempt from?

Sounds about right.
 
2014-03-13 05:32:44 PM
People on that page are actually suggesting that a gun is an appropriate response to a cell phone (or popcorn) being thrown at you. That's incredible, though not entirely surprising.
 
2014-03-13 05:34:57 PM
The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a phone is a good guy with a phone.  ...and a gun. A gun definitely helps too.
 
2014-03-13 05:35:02 PM
Sure, but if the dead guy is black then everything's okay right?
 
2014-03-13 05:35:28 PM

scottydoesntknow: meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!

[0-media-cdn.foolz.us image 526x300]


Damn, I was hoping he'd left.
 
2014-03-13 05:35:36 PM
If someone says touch me again and I'll kill you, it may be a good idea to not touch them. Not that them killing  you is justified. IT did come with a warning too.

/too bad he didn't have a .25 would have gotten stopped by the wife's finger.
 
2014-03-13 05:35:46 PM
So you're saying the shooter's a dick.
 
2014-03-13 05:37:06 PM

Callous: So a (retired)cop shot someone for breaking a rule that he believes himself to be exempt from?

Sounds about right.


Yep.

I am just waiting for the other cops to show up at his trial with a "HERO" sign.
 
2014-03-13 05:37:12 PM
A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.
 
2014-03-13 05:37:34 PM

FnkyTwn: Sure, but if the dead guy is black then everything's okay right?


Unless the guy who got shot was black.  Then OUTRAGE and we tweet the shooter's parents address with vague references to retribution.
 
2014-03-13 05:38:21 PM
Is this a Zimmerman thread?
 
2014-03-13 05:38:35 PM
IDK, my BFF Zimmerman?
 
2014-03-13 05:39:23 PM

jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.


Good thing this guy was a cop then.
 
2014-03-13 05:39:42 PM

Kit Fister: Damn, I was hoping he'd left.


No I have the belief he is still in prison which is what the story of this is about have you not done the reading or perhaps the first language of you is not the English.
 
2014-03-13 05:39:51 PM

justanotherfarkinfarker: If someone says touch me again and I'll kill you, it may be a good idea to not touch them. Not that them killing  you is justified. IT did come with a warning too.

/too bad he didn't have a .25 would have gotten stopped by the wife's finger.


The warning makes it premeditation.
 
2014-03-13 05:39:59 PM

scottydoesntknow: meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!

[0-media-cdn.foolz.us image 526x300]


someone who is trying way to hard to be pocket ninja, I noticed it in another thread earlier this week.
 
2014-03-13 05:40:55 PM
Come on, admins, green this but not the story of the Houston dad who shot and killed a teen at 2AM this morning after catching him in his daughter's bedroom?

I mean, if we're going to have a gun flame-war, lets get some new material.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/03/13/houston-dad-fatally-shoots-teen -i nside-daughters-room-report-says/
 
2014-03-13 05:41:10 PM
I swear I typed that second "o" in too.
 
2014-03-13 05:41:23 PM

scottydoesntknow: meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!

[0-media-cdn.foolz.us image 526x300]


Google Translate is apparently ridiculously drunk right now.
 
2014-03-13 05:41:47 PM
Reactions that are equal, or nearly equal to that of having a cell phone thrown at you:

Throwing a cell phone back
Throwing popcorn
Throwing a shoe
Yelling at them and threatening to call the police

Reactions that are not anywhere near equal to that of having a cell phone thrown at you:

Shooting the person
Stabbing the person
Tazing the person
Macing the person
Doing anything lethal to the person
Force them to watch Pootie Tang
 
2014-03-13 05:42:19 PM
Sooo... how long is a "moment"? How many "moments" between text/bang?

I'll reserve further outrage until we know the answer to this. Until then, I will automatically assume this is journalistic pearl-clutching.

EDIT: Found another source... 15 minutes worth of "moments", however many that is...
 
2014-03-13 05:42:24 PM

Vexed Thespian: someone who is trying way to hard to be pocket ninja, I noticed it in another thread earlier this week.


LAUGHTER OL I have the hope that you are doing the kidding and are not this much of the stupid thing. Now who do you feel is the right person and the wrong person in the shooting of this?
 
2014-03-13 05:42:35 PM
Was the victim wearing a hoodie?  Could he be considered a "thug"?  If not, then Imma guess OId Man Reeves is going to prison instead of signing autographs for standing his ground against The Other.  Because Florida.
 
2014-03-13 05:43:45 PM
I know it's been answered, and I'm probably too lazy to look it up, or perhaps my google-fu is weak at the moment, but was it legal for the shooter to carry his firearm into the theatre? Does being a retired cop make a difference on that matter?

In the scheme of him making a text, doesn't this sort of confirm he is not of a 'sound' state of mind? If he can't recognize his exact actions are the same as someone elses actions whom he is angry at, that's a bit of a pscyhological disconnect, isn't it?

He's still guilty as all, but seems like this doesn't change as much on the surface. Perhaps maybe legal strategy for the defense.
 
2014-03-13 05:44:06 PM

Callous: jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.

Good thing this guy was a cop then.


I thought he was a retired cop...which now makes him a civilian.
 
2014-03-13 05:45:28 PM

jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.


Police officers are civilians as are retired police officers.
 
2014-03-13 05:46:47 PM

redmid17: jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.

Police officers are civilians as are retired police officers.


What about Old People?  Should they be allowed?  Because they are pretty batty and quick to anger.
 
2014-03-13 05:47:17 PM

buttcat: Callous: jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.

Good thing this guy was a cop then.

I thought he was a retired cop...which now makes him a civilian.


Actually cops are civilians, retired or not.  I guess you believe we should disarm the police.
 
2014-03-13 05:48:24 PM

Callous: buttcat: Callous: jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.

Good thing this guy was a cop then.

I thought he was a retired cop...which now makes him a civilian.

Actually cops are civilians, retired or not.  I guess you believe we should disarm the police.


Sorry, I guess jaykay believes we should disarm the police.
 
2014-03-13 05:49:47 PM

Callous: Callous: buttcat: Callous: jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.

Good thing this guy was a cop then.

I thought he was a retired cop...which now makes him a civilian.

Actually cops are civilians, retired or not.  I guess you believe we should disarm the police.

Sorry, I guess jaykay believes we should disarm the police.


To be fair, there are plenty of them who have no business being armed (much less being given positions of authority)
 
2014-03-13 05:50:19 PM

factoryconnection: He also shot someone over a texting dispute!


This

Callous: So a (retired)cop shot someone for breaking a rule that he believes himself to be exempt from?

Sounds about right.


This

Vexed Thespian: I swear I typed that second "o" in too.

And this, too - for the heckuvit.

 
2014-03-13 05:51:04 PM

The Googles Do Nothing: redmid17: jaytkay: A civilian who feels the "need" to carry a gun around suburban America is too deluded and paranoid to be trusted with a gun.

Police officers are civilians as are retired police officers.

What about Old People?  Should they be allowed?  Because they are pretty batty and quick to anger.


Old people are civilians too. I don't think the AARP would allow legislation which prevented old people.
 
2014-03-13 05:53:35 PM

Serious Black: I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.


Je ne veux pour l'opinion de vous sur ce point car je pense qu'il est tout à fait la chose que nous pouvons arriver à la solution de ensemble et peut-être faire de l'écriture de la mémoire d'amicus curiae pour la partie qui est la bonne personne. Je vais faire de l'écriture de cette si vous faites la signature pour moi.
 
2014-03-13 05:55:37 PM

drew46n2: Come on, admins, green this but not the story of the Houston dad who shot and killed a teen at 2AM this morning after catching him in his daughter's bedroom?

I mean, if we're going to have a gun flame-war, lets get some new material.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/03/13/houston-dad-fatally-shoots-teen -i nside-daughters-room-report-says/


That headline is better without the last word.
 
2014-03-13 05:57:56 PM

meow said the dog: Vexed Thespian: someone who is trying way to hard to be pocket ninja, I noticed it in another thread earlier this week.

LAUGHTER OL I have the hope that you are doing the kidding and are not this much of the stupid thing. Now who do you feel is the right person and the wrong person in the shooting of this?


how hard do you have to work at having grammar that poor?
do you crank out a paragraph or sentence - then proof it for making TOO much sense or not sounding autistic enough?
 
2014-03-13 05:58:01 PM

drew46n2: Come on, admins, green this but not the story of the Houston dad who shot and killed a teen at 2AM this morning after catching him in his daughter's bedroom?

I mean, if we're going to have a gun flame-war, lets get some new material.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/03/13/houston-dad-fatally-shoots-teen -i nside-daughters-room-report-says/


I saw that. Really sad story. It seems that another kid in the house told the father somebody was in the daughter's room, the father grabbed his gun and went to her room catching the boy in it, ask the boy to identify himself and when he did that the daughter dried rape, then the boy suddenly went for something, probably his pants, with that and the daughter crying rape the father fired.
 
2014-03-13 05:58:18 PM

meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!


Heya Meow! Howzit going? Good to see you again! We are counting on your cogent and reasoned discourse on this matter, as we always do.

/laughter OL
 
2014-03-13 05:59:01 PM

scottydoesntknow: meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!

[0-media-cdn.foolz.us image 526x300]


It's not so much "word salad" as "word mixed greens."
 
2014-03-13 06:01:59 PM
FTFA: "Reeves remains in the Land O' Lakes jail with no bond."

The creamiest, most delicious jail ever.
 
2014-03-13 06:02:28 PM

meow said the dog: Listen I am tired of seeing the story of this in the news. The popcorn throwing was the escalator of this and for the reason of this listen you just do not know where the chaos might obtain as this could have left to someone doing the shooting. He was lucky to not have been shot and was probably the person who was thankful for having the gun of he to protect the self of him from the possible aggression by the other person who might also be the person with the gun but happened to not be this person. You see when you must do the ground standing then what is the thing that happens is you must always make the assumption of you that the person who is not you but is the other person might have the armament and then react according to this and I believe that is what was done in the case of this and the right person did the right thing and the wrong person did the wrong thing and unfortunately of this the result was the death of one of these persons but not of the other and we will never know if the right person would have done the different thing if not the wrong person but instead the right person. For this reason we should not apply the Court of Farker Opinion on this case until we wish for seeing this from both sides of the wrong one and the right one.

I do wish for the opinion of you on this because I am thinking it is quite the thing that we can come to the solution of together and perhaps do the writing of the amicus brief for the party who is the right person. I will do the writing of this if you do the signing for me.

Let us do this!


s9.postimg.org
 
2014-03-13 06:02:34 PM

FFS

 
2014-03-13 06:03:00 PM
Florida's legal murder law rearing it's ugly head again?

static.fjcdn.com
 
Displayed 50 of 129 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report