Sin_City_Superhero: Marcus Aurelius: How anyone can watch this channel is way beyond meI'll give you a hint: Arizona & Florida demographics.
lockers: [img.fark.net image 850x595]
ISOLATED INCIDENT! ROGUE STAFFER! FOX DOESN'T SPEAK FOR REPUBLICANS!
what_now: How will we ever get a handle on our debt if you can't cut $8 billion out of food stamps over a 10-year period? How will you ever do that?"Well, you pedantic little prick, we could start with the USS Gerald Ford, which is ESTIMATED to cost $17.5 billion dollars and is a first of it's kind super carrier.But we need that, right? Because of this guy:[www.independent.co.uk image 620x465]
TV's Vinnie: keylock71: What a miserable prick... How do some people watch a steady diet of this crap?http://www.salon.com/2014/02/27/i_lost_my_dad_to_fox_news_how_a_gene ra tion_was_captured_by_thrashing_hysteria/
Splish: Soup4Bonnie: Splish: What precisely should be upsetting about that?That we're supposed to be the wealthiest country in the world yet 1 in 4 kids is on SNAP may not bother you, but it does me.We're not the wealthiest country in the world. And even if we were, that doesn't mean that every person living here is wealthy. What alternative would you suggest?Children born in poor homes are forcibly taken and reassigned to rich homes? Poor people are prohibited from having children? Poor families with children just don't receive any assistance? Wealth redistribution to poor families without earmarking it for food?Here's another way of looking at it: no child has starved to death in this country because their family simply couldn't afford food in decades, largely because of SNAP and food stamps and similar programs. That's something to be proud of.
Confabulat: UndeadPoetsSociety: WHAT THE LIVING fark ARE YOU JACKASSES SO farkING TERRIFIED OF, AND WHY?I've been wondering this about America's conservatives for a long time.I think the short answer is: The future.
UndeadPoetsSociety: WHAT THE LIVING fark ARE YOU JACKASSES SO farkING TERRIFIED OF, AND WHY?
whosits_112: He brings shame to the name of Varney...
vernonFL: heavymetal: I would love to see Stuart Varney lose his life savings through a Bernie Madoff style Ponzi scheme, need the social safety net, but not qualify due to some cuts he endorsed/promoted which wound up becoming law.Or how about sone kind of 'Trading Places' type experiment where he is reduced to nothing and a random black guy is given his job at Fox and his house and possessions?
illogic: Dr Dreidel: "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."// yup, still Rand Paulfark that asshole. He voted right along with the GOP to cut food stamps because he thinks millionaires are using them too much or something. Rand may be against military spending, but he gives absolutely zero farks about the poor in this country.
heavymetal: I would love to see Stuart Varney lose his life savings through a Bernie Madoff style Ponzi scheme, need the social safety net, but not qualify due to some cuts he endorsed/promoted which wound up becoming law.
rosebud_the_sled: Any good conservative Christian knows, Jesus said "Give a man a fish and he will be satisfied. Kill thousands with a bombardment from a battleship and you save money giving them all those fish."
Magorn: Marcus Aurelius: "You are told that you are taking food out of the mouths of children. You're making people starve. You are bad because you're cutting. You can't win! How will we ever get a handle on our debt if you can't cut $8 billion out of food stamps over a 10-year period? How will you ever do that?"How is cutting $8 billion going to help the deficit when defense spending is over $700 billion a year? Cut 2% from the military and you're way past $8 billion, you worthless piece of stinking garbage."you can't ever win!"Uhhh, well I guess that depends on exactly what game you were playing in the first place, though I'm really not sure I want to know the rules of the one that has "More poor people starving to death" as a victory condition
what_now: Eddie Adams from Torrance: The trouble is that cutting military budgets is dangerous politically.I get that, but I'm appalled that "hungry children" isn't more politically dangerous.
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: what_now: Eddie Adams from Torrance: The trouble is that cutting military budgets is dangerous politically.I get that, but I'm appalled that "hungry children" isn't more politically dangerous.You can't fire hungry children into Baghdad and blow up a building!...Or can you?
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jan 21 2017 19:55:54
Runtime: 0.316 sec (315 ms)