If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NPR)   Shorter NPR: BSABSVR   (npr.org) divider line 214
    More: Stupid, congresses, Lee University, Civil Rights Act of 1964, major piece, Morris Fiorina  
•       •       •

4372 clicks; posted to Politics » on 09 Mar 2014 at 5:42 PM (37 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



214 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-03-10 03:04:33 PM  

s2s2s2: whidbey: You never backed up your "bluster" in the first place.

Oh, I see. You are trolling. My bad, troll on. Doesn't bother me, much.


Um, no. You made it look like there were Republicans trying to remove provisions from the NDAA. Ron Paul and some other nutball from the Carolinas doesn't bolster your argument any.

The vast majority of the Republican party favors shiat like NDAA. That's why they came up with it. Once again, you're just talking shiat, and projecting your failures.
 
2014-03-10 03:11:33 PM  

whidbey: You made it look


What you saw has more to do with you, than what I said. I said the Obama Administration made sure unpopular(even with some Republicans), new provisions of the NDAA for 2012 were included. That is a fact.

You can parse it all you want, but my statement is correct.
 
2014-03-10 03:25:40 PM  

s2s2s2: whidbey: You made it look

What you saw has more to do with you, than what I said. I said the Obama Administration made sure unpopular(even with some Republicans), new provisions of the NDAA for 2012 were included. That is a fact.

You can parse it all you want, but my statement is correct.


lol no it's bullshiat, at least three of us called you out, rather than admit you were wrong, you continue to threadshiat.

you want there to be more to it than there is

I said the Obama Administration made sure unpopular(even with some Republicans

haha no dude we've been through this--thread's over now
 
2014-03-10 08:15:52 PM  

s2s2s2: The court case that would have removed them was fought by "Lawyers with absolutely no connection to the Obama Admin!". I'm sad to see you're going with the "Empty Suit" argument.



hmmm...are you deliberately obtuse, or completely dishonesty? I can't tell at this point.


s2s2s2: I said the Obama Administration made sure unpopular(even with some Republicans), new provisions of the NDAA for 2012 were included. That is a fact.


again...no. the republicans who wrote those provisions and attached them to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 made sure they were included. Because, once again, congress writes the laws, not the executive.


shiat...I knew you wasn't exactly a deep thinker, but you're getting tedious.
 
2014-03-10 08:17:51 PM  

Phinn: At least I know the difference between defamation and copyright infringement.


if you think that picture was defamation, then no you don't.
 
2014-03-10 11:01:23 PM  

log_jammin: Phinn: At least I know the difference between defamation and copyright infringement.

if you think that picture was defamation, then no you don't.


Weak.
 
2014-03-10 11:18:22 PM  
True.Sorry that stings so badly for you.
 
2014-03-11 12:21:07 AM  

log_jammin: the republicans who wrote those provisions and attached them to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 made sure they were included. Because, once again, congress writes the laws, not the executive.


I posted a link to the case where this is still an ongoing issue. Lawyers for the Obama administration fought in court to keep the provisions in. I didn't say they did it at Obama's direct command, but they were fighting a case called Hedges v. Obama.

So when I said this:

s2s2s2: Well, they weren't, until the Obama administration made sure they were included, when there were even Republicans wanting those provisions removed.


I can see where you misunderstood. Maybe "fought to keep the provisions in" would have been less painful for you to read.
 
2014-03-11 12:23:23 AM  

whidbey: at least three of us called you out


Well, we all know if three people say I'm wrong, I must be!
 
2014-03-11 12:55:49 AM  

s2s2s2: log_jammin: the republicans who wrote those provisions and attached them to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 made sure they were included. Because, once again, congress writes the laws, not the executive.

I posted a link to the case where this is still an ongoing issue. Lawyers for the Obama administration fought in court to keep the provisions in. I didn't say they did it at Obama's direct command, but they were fighting a case called Hedges v. Obama.

So when I said this: s2s2s2: Well, they weren't, until the Obama administration made sure they were included, when there were even Republicans wanting those provisions removed.

I can see where you misunderstood. Maybe "fought to keep the provisions in" would have been less painful for you to read.


like I said...you've gotten tedious, and I'm tired of going round in circles with you.

But on the bright side I know that you're someone who refuses to admit error so I know not to bother with you in the future. so there's that at least.
 
2014-03-11 01:10:59 AM  

Phinn: log_jammin: Phinn: At least I know the difference between defamation and copyright infringement.

if you think that picture was defamation, then no you don't.

Weak.


it ate my link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
 
2014-03-11 01:43:43 AM  

log_jammin: and I'm tired of going round in circles with you


Get some rest. You need it. You really brought that windmill down.
 
2014-03-11 01:52:29 AM  

s2s2s2: log_jammin: and I'm tired of going round in circles with you

Get some rest. You need it. You really brought that windmill down.


and I'm now down with you.

*plonk*
 
2014-03-11 01:55:25 AM  

log_jammin: and I'm now down with you.

*plonk*


LOL.
 
Displayed 14 of 214 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report