If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Outrage after Brooklyn tattoo artist tattoos his dog. How's the dog going to find employment now?   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 7
    More: Asinine, American Veterinary Medical Association, Instagram, Russian TV, tattoo ink  
•       •       •

4614 clicks; posted to Main » on 06 Mar 2014 at 5:54 AM (37 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-03-06 06:56:59 AM  
2 votes:

bern_viking: This outrages me about as much as the other idiots/douchebags/twits that "reshape" the ears and other parts of dogs or cut and trim them to follow trends and fashions or breed the poor beasts into suffering, wheezing, disease-prone wrecks that are actuelly more of a fashion accesoire than a companion.


This.  So many dog breeds are prone to genetic disorders.  If the guy putting a tattoo on his dog is cruel, then pretty much 99% of dog breeders should be behind bars.

/ They should probably be behind bars anyway
2014-03-06 06:24:01 AM  
2 votes:
This outrages me about as much as the other idiots/douchebags/twits that "reshape" the ears and other parts of dogs or cut and trim them to follow trends and fashions or breed the poor beasts into suffering, wheezing, disease-prone wrecks that are actuelly more of a fashion accesoire than a companion.

A dog is a dog, doesnt need to be "improved" or enhanced.

And 99% of dogs dont need little coats to be outside. If they do maybe you are living in the wrong place for that breed of dogs.

Get a life. And let your dog have a good life. Visit your local dog pound for both.
2014-03-06 07:03:52 AM  
1 votes:
It's not really any different than tattooing a child or anyone else without their consent, so what's the big deal? I mean, no one would care if he did that, would they?

Oh.
2014-03-06 06:48:36 AM  
1 votes:
A douchebag from Brooklyn? The hell?
2014-03-06 06:10:34 AM  
1 votes:
Although it is not illegal to tattoo a dog, the ASPCA condemns the practice for anything other than identification purposes.

I'd say that would be considered identification. ASPCA doesn't have enough on it's plate? Picking on this seems like overkill.
2014-03-06 05:22:58 AM  
1 votes:
Although it is not illegal to tattoo a dog, the ASPCA condemns the practice for anything other than identification purposes.

You know who else tattooed only for identification purposes?
2014-03-05 10:11:34 PM  
1 votes:
It's a stupid thing to do, but if the dog was under sedation then why the outrage? It's not like he was putting the dog through a ton of pain
 
Displayed 7 of 7 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report