If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Grantland)   Seriously, what's the big deal about Kate Upton (spoiler alert: It's boobs)   (grantland.com) divider line 110
    More: Cool, Kate Upton, humans, Gone Girl, boobs, Jayne Mansfield, Brigitte Bardot, Christie Brinkley, Elle Macpherson  
•       •       •

10868 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 05 Mar 2014 at 3:42 PM (33 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



110 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-03-06 10:14:52 AM  

TotallyHeadless: Kate Upton looks soft with no muscle tone. She's young, that's why she is relatively thin. When she hits about 27 it's going to be really hard for her to keep the weight and shape (with her square torso and hips) to a point where she is conventionally attractive.


She's got plenty of money.  She won't have to work daily as regular folks do, so she'll have plenty of time to hire a personal trainer and work out.  Unless she just says fuggit and lets herself go....kinda like Jennifer Lien.

i1168.photobucket.com
 
2014-03-06 10:40:45 AM  

ristst: TotallyHeadless: Kate Upton looks soft with no muscle tone. She's young, that's why she is relatively thin. When she hits about 27 it's going to be really hard for her to keep the weight and shape (with her square torso and hips) to a point where she is conventionally attractive.

She's got plenty of money.  She won't have to work daily as regular folks do, so she'll have plenty of time to hire a personal trainer and work out.  Unless she just says fuggit and lets herself go....kinda like Jennifer Lien.

[i1168.photobucket.com image 549x373]


Wow! I am happy I never googled her after the show ended. What a waste, she was so cute.

Kate does have really nice boobs, a bit big for my own tastes but not a deal breaker. I mean that as if I met a woman I had a chance with that had boobs that big. I am an A, B, kind of C type of guy. I like them small and perky, they tend to stay that way much longer on smaller breasts.
 
2014-03-06 10:56:07 AM  

Valiente: nocturnal001: ReapTheChaos: Nix Nightbird: foo monkey: Wellon Dowd: If it weren't for her big ole titties, nobody would give her a second glance.

Exactly.  If you can focus it past her boobs (it's not easy), she's got a beautiful face and ass.

[l1.yimg.com image 600x429]

[www.hecklerspray.com image 386x382]

?? ...If you say so.

I think it's the makeup and Photoshop you're admiring.

That's what I was trying to point out earlier, but people here at Fark don't want to hear anything bad about her. She's not ugly or anything and she's not really fat, yet. Give her time though, she has "fat tub O lard" written all over her. I'd bet the only thing keeping her in the shape she's in now is her busy lifestyle and schedule. When she slows down, especially if she has a kid or two, she's going to balloon out in a hurry.

Who gives a shiat? My dong isn't trying to predict the future.

Yo, I be crystal ballin'


I'm more of a palm reader myself...
 
2014-03-06 11:07:08 AM  

macadamnut: 100 Watt Walrus: macadamnut: 100 Watt Walrus: Nobody tell macadamnut about how misused "literally" and "irony" have become.

I just think boobs should be properly defined.

Ahh, well that's perfectly understandable. Would you accept "spectacular"? Because I'd go with "spectacular."


Definitely, real and spectacular. For "amazing" you gotta pass the pencil test.


I would say great, super, fine.(in no particular order)

Spectacular and Amazing should both be on the other side of the pencil test. with something more common just shy of the pencil.  Awesome, fantastic, superb.

So, now I've interested myself(easy to do when I take a snow day from work and am sitting around bored), I'm going to give it a shot.
(mournful tits to bad implants, even those that pass the pencil test are not to be considered, the list is based on the premise is that those under review are mostly aesthetically pleasing, have no objective flaws, scars, stretch marks like a water mellon, disfigurement, shrivelled granny boobs, etc...(good implants in pretty breasts is a subjective flaw, since we're discussing things that none of us will ever touch, it's more about grading visual appeal))

Fine(as in just fine, those'll do)?
Nice(can encompass "cute" to "Niiiice")
Great
Fine(as in that is one Fine set of)?
Fantastic
Awesome
And now the terms only for those that pass the pencil test.
Superb
Amazing
Spectacular

As you get towards the bottom of the list, they sort of have to be big. Awe, amazement, spectacle, these all denote something that's beyond expectation, something out of the ordinary)  But the top of the list can be any size really.  But you can have a small-medium "Superb"(which are more likely to pass the pencil test).  Awesome can account for bigger, firm, well shaped, but does technically hold a pencil up.  That's the Venn diagram overlap.

/thoughts?
 
2014-03-06 01:12:48 PM  

omeganuepsilon: macadamnut: 100 Watt Walrus: macadamnut: 100 Watt Walrus: Nobody tell macadamnut about how misused "literally" and "irony" have become.

I just think boobs should be properly defined.

Ahh, well that's perfectly understandable. Would you accept "spectacular"? Because I'd go with "spectacular."


Definitely, real and spectacular. For "amazing" you gotta pass the pencil test.

I would say great, super, fine.(in no particular order)

Spectacular and Amazing should both be on the other side of the pencil test. with something more common just shy of the pencil.  Awesome, fantastic, superb.

So, now I've interested myself(easy to do when I take a snow day from work and am sitting around bored), I'm going to give it a shot.
(mournful tits to bad implants, even those that pass the pencil test are not to be considered, the list is based on the premise is that those under review are mostly aesthetically pleasing, have no objective flaws, scars, stretch marks like a water mellon, disfigurement, shrivelled granny boobs, etc...(good implants in pretty breasts is a subjective flaw, since we're discussing things that none of us will ever touch, it's more about grading visual appeal))

Fine(as in just fine, those'll do)?
Nice(can encompass "cute" to "Niiiice")
Great
Fine(as in that is one Fine set of)?
Fantastic
Awesome
And now the terms only for those that pass the pencil test.
Superb
Amazing
Spectacular

As you get towards the bottom of the list, they sort of have to be big. Awe, amazement, spectacle, these all denote something that's beyond expectation, something out of the ordinary)  But the top of the list can be any size really.  But you can have a small-medium "Superb"(which are more likely to pass the pencil test).  Awesome can account for bigger, firm, well shaped, but does technically hold a pencil up.  That's the Venn diagram overlap.

/thoughts?



You are using the wrong brain.
 
2014-03-06 01:16:06 PM  

omeganuepsilon: macadamnut: 100 Watt Walrus: macadamnut: 100 Watt Walrus: Nobody tell macadamnut about how misused "literally" and "irony" have become.

I just think boobs should be properly defined.

Ahh, well that's perfectly understandable. Would you accept "spectacular"? Because I'd go with "spectacular."


Definitely, real and spectacular. For "amazing" you gotta pass the pencil test.

I would say great, super, fine.(in no particular order)

Spectacular and Amazing should both be on the other side of the pencil test. with something more common just shy of the pencil.  Awesome, fantastic, superb.

So, now I've interested myself(easy to do when I take a snow day from work and am sitting around bored), I'm going to give it a shot.
(mournful tits to bad implants, even those that pass the pencil test are not to be considered, the list is based on the premise is that those under review are mostly aesthetically pleasing, have no objective flaws, scars, stretch marks like a water mellon, disfigurement, shrivelled granny boobs, etc...(good implants in pretty breasts is a subjective flaw, since we're discussing things that none of us will ever touch, it's more about grading visual appeal))

Fine(as in just fine, those'll do)?
Nice(can encompass "cute" to "Niiiice")
Great
Fine(as in that is one Fine set of)?
Fantastic
Awesome
And now the terms only for those that pass the pencil test.
Superb
Amazing
Spectacular

As you get towards the bottom of the list, they sort of have to be big. Awe, amazement, spectacle, these all denote something that's beyond expectation, something out of the ordinary)  But the top of the list can be any size really.  But you can have a small-medium "Superb"(which are more likely to pass the pencil test).  Awesome can account for bigger, firm, well shaped, but does technically hold a pencil up.  That's the Venn diagram overlap.

/thoughts?


files.abovetopsecret.com
 
2014-03-06 01:53:58 PM  
macadamnut: Fascinating

[files.abovetopsecret.com image 280x240]

That will never do.  Mournful can be fascinating, you know, like a trainwreck.
 
2014-03-06 02:32:06 PM  

ristst: TotallyHeadless: Kate Upton looks soft with no muscle tone. She's young, that's why she is relatively thin. When she hits about 27 it's going to be really hard for her to keep the weight and shape (with her square torso and hips) to a point where she is conventionally attractive.

She's got plenty of money.  She won't have to work daily as regular folks do, so she'll have plenty of time to hire a personal trainer and work out.  Unless she just says fuggit and lets herself go....kinda like Jennifer Lien.

[i1168.photobucket.com image 549x373]


Dayum.  That doesn't even look like the same person.
 
2014-03-06 06:24:11 PM  
Probably not a book mark
 
2014-03-06 07:14:37 PM  
Bookmark This!
/every relevant post ITT
//some (a few) that aren't relevant to my interests
///no text only posts
 
Displayed 10 of 110 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report