If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Raw Story)   Right-wing columnist urges GOP to abandon minority outreach: " 'Colorblind conservatism' is a dead end, and the future of the conservative movement is as a home for white ethnocentrism"   (rawstory.com) divider line 220
    More: Scary, GOP, John Derbyshire, Right-wing columnist, conservatives, alpha males  
•       •       •

3144 clicks; posted to Politics » on 04 Mar 2014 at 1:35 PM (41 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



220 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-03-04 02:50:14 PM  

Commander Lysdexic: Satan's Bunny Slippers: Oh, subby, no he didn't.

*click*

oh krist. he really did.

Oh he went even fuhrer...


That was farking horrible to read.



agreed.  I read the entire thing, but I don't know why. I do want to cockpunch this asshat though.  Repeatedly.
 
2014-03-04 02:52:18 PM  

neversubmit: The writer of the article and many posters in this thread have it wrong the modern Republican Party has always been pro-minority, the wealthy. Only with the assassination of William McKinley did the Republicans in the form Theodore Roosevelt help the non-wealthy and even then it could argued that Roosevelt acted to save his class from the worst of his class.

/Maybe I've watching too much of The Men Who Built America?


Watching that show, I was absolutely amazed at how much on-screen time they could fill with the same three well-dressed actors staring out of windows and walking down corridors in slow motion.
 
2014-03-04 02:54:22 PM  

Commander Lysdexic: Satan's Bunny Slippers: Oh, subby, no he didn't.

*click*

oh krist. he really did.

Oh he went even fuhrer...

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/derbyshire-future-conservative- m ovement-home-white-ethnocentrism

Derbyshire continues: "'Not flocking' is putting it mildly. Practically all educated black Americans, for example, are communists. And white conservatives are the **only** people in the U.S.A. trying to 'transcend contentious racial issues.' Everyone else is keenly exploiting them for group advantage and personal enrichment.
"Integration has occurred in some of the upper strata of our society, but everywhere else ethnic disaggregation proceeds apace. I'm an integrationist personally but the trend lines are plain.
"I am reluctantly coming to agree with my friend Jared Taylor of American Renaissance: whites may as well start asserting themselves and join in fighting for the spoils.
"If that's right, 'colorblind conservatism' is a dead end, and the future of the conservative movement is as a home for white ethnocentrism."

Regardless of one's views, it is undeniable that many across the country fear certain conservatives are attempting to erode women's rights. What should conservatives do to increase their share of the female vote?
"I doubt they can do much," John Derbyshire explains to Communities Digital News.

"Women are just like that," Derbyshire continues. "One thing we might try would be putting some alpha males up front, instead of mealy-mouthed cringing betas. Conservative strategists should all study the Chateau Heartiste Blog, though without telling anyone they are doing so."

So what is the Chateau Heartiste Blog he wants conservative strategists to read?

Well I did some reading....

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/

And now I am done with this shiat.

That was farking horrible to read.


Notice that he got fired from the National Review for saying it's only 5% of black people who are ruining it for everyone else by matching up to stereotypes he has of them. Now it's virtually every educated adult black person is a communist hostile to American interests.
 
2014-03-04 02:56:49 PM  

Commander Lysdexic: Oh he went even fuhrer...

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/derbyshire-future-conservative- m ovement-home-white-ethnocentrism

Derbyshire continues: "'Not flocking' is putting it mildly. Practically all educated black Americans, for example, are communists.


If by "communist" you mean "anyone to the left of Michelle Bachmann", then this is true.  It's also true of practically all educated white Americans.
 
2014-03-04 02:59:03 PM  
Has anyone mentioned Derbyshire's published columns about sexy, sexy, fifteen-year old girls?

Creepy, creepy guy
 
2014-03-04 02:59:22 PM  

Zombalupagus: This guy also has the balls to say "conservatives are the only people in the U.S.A. trying to 'transcend contentious racial issues'". Yes. He said that. He pretty much said that everyone else but racist conservative white people are racists.


Here is an actual quote from him:

Leaving aside the intended malice, I actually think "White Supremacist" is not bad semantically. White supremacy, in the sense of a society in which key decisions are made by white Europeans, is one of the better arrangements History has come up with. There have of course been some blots on the record, but I don't see how it can be denied that net-net, white Europeans have made a better job of running fair and stable societies than has any other group

He then argued that if anyone disagreed with that premise than they are lying or need to move away from America (which has a white political majority) or they are a hypocrite. Dude tries to pretend he's being a moderate on racial issues but that "facts are facts, white people are just superior." It would be hilarious if he didn't have people agreeing with that position.
 
2014-03-04 03:02:01 PM  

Grungehamster: sigdiamond2000: Derbyshire, who lost his job with the National Review after publishing a "nasty and indefensible" 2012 column about his racial prejudices

Derbyshire had been publishing nasty and indefensible columns about race for years before the National Review fired him. The idea that they didn't know that he was a white nationalist is complete bullsh*t. They didn't fire him for that; they hired him for that. They fired him because one of his articles by chance garnered mainstream outrage and damaged their brand. It didn't have anything to do with the fact that he's a racist.

Didn't you read his article? White people harbor no racial animus or ill will and would be perfectly willing to treat everyone equally. The problem is that those inferior minorities can't live like that in civilized society and as such have to be marginalized for the good of what Eurocentric civilization has salvaged from its barbaric Middle Eastern origins.


And?  Back when William F. Buckley founded the "intellectual side" to the conservative movement, that was pretty much his argument why blacks shouldn't be allowed to vote.  Show some respect, this was the high point of conservative thought.
 
2014-03-04 03:04:29 PM  

netizencain: Mainstream GOP kicked this guy out.  He now writes for a white supremacist group. I wouldn't call him right-wing columnist... more like neo-nazi blogger


Funny how one inch to the right of Teabaggers are the Nazis, but everyone left of them are LIEbruls.
 
2014-03-04 03:04:40 PM  

Sgt Otter: Diogenes: jake_lex: netizencain: Mainstream GOP kicked this guy out.  He now writes for a white supremacist group. I wouldn't call him right-wing columnist... more like neo-nazi blogger

Yeah, I bet he isn't a true Scotsman either.

Indeed.  They kicked him out because he made for inconvenient PR.  Not because they disagreed with him.

NRO was fine with him publishing racist dog-whistle editorials for years.  He was fired because he slipped up and lowered the frequency a tad too far.


High-frequency hearing tends to diminish in the elderly.  As the GOP racist base ages, they have to lower the frequency so they can still hear it.
 
2014-03-04 03:05:01 PM  

jaerik: neversubmit: The writer of the article and many posters in this thread have it wrong the modern Republican Party has always been pro-minority, the wealthy. Only with the assassination of William McKinley did the Republicans in the form Theodore Roosevelt help the non-wealthy and even then it could argued that Roosevelt acted to save his class from the worst of his class.

/Maybe I've watching too much of The Men Who Built America?

Watching that show, I was absolutely amazed at how much on-screen time they could fill with the same three well-dressed actors staring out of windows and walking down corridors in slow motion.


You are right, they could have told the story better if they used better images. As it was they seem to be saying these guys are action movie stars. The information in the voice overs contrasted with the parts of Howard Zinn A People's History Of The United States for that period is what kept me watching.
 
2014-03-04 03:05:52 PM  

Grungehamster: He then argued that if anyone disagreed with that premise than they are lying or need to move away from America (which has a white political majority) or they are a hypocrite. Dude tries to pretend he's being a moderate on racial issues but that "facts are facts, white people are just superior." It would be hilarious if he didn't have people agreeing with that position.


Well, then why are we keeping all these other people around? Imagine what society could achieve if we did not have to contend with the parasite.
 
2014-03-04 03:07:52 PM  
img.fark.net
"mealy-mouthed cringing beta"
 
2014-03-04 03:09:09 PM  

palelizard: Grungehamster: He then argued that if anyone disagreed with that premise than they are lying or need to move away from America (which has a white political majority) or they are a hypocrite. Dude tries to pretend he's being a moderate on racial issues but that "facts are facts, white people are just superior." It would be hilarious if he didn't have people agreeing with that position.

Well, then why are we keeping all these other people around? Imagine what society could achieve if we did not have to contend with the parasite.


Ironically, he himself has suggested he might seek asylum in China due to all this PC-ism gone amok in America where you can't voice certain opinions in this country anymore without being ostracized.

That's right: traveling to China to finally have freedom of expression.
 
2014-03-04 03:11:21 PM  

QU!RK1019: [img.fark.net image 615x345]
"mealy-mouthed cringing beta"


The funny thing is that's the EXACT image of MRAs that aren't dude-bros: the most non-assuming goofy looking mothers on the planet who think "man girls didn't like me no matter how desperately I acted, must have been because I wasn't obnoxious enough."
 
2014-03-04 03:13:18 PM  
Grungehamster:
Didn't you read his article? White people harbor no racial animus or ill will and would be perfectly willing to treat everyone equally.

You meant this facetiously, but you're correct.
What other group of people welcomes extremely large and unsustainable amounts of outsiders of various cultures and ethnicities (firefox spellcheck is saying that's not a word?) into their country? Where is better to be a minority?
For god's sake, stop holding white people to standards far above what is demanded of others.
You're getting your wish, anyway. White numbers are declining worldwide and the West will be multicultural, and by that I mean monocultural.
 
2014-03-04 03:14:58 PM  

Grungehamster: QU!RK1019: [img.fark.net image 615x345]
"mealy-mouthed cringing beta"

The funny thing is that's the EXACT image of MRAs that aren't dude-bros: the most non-assuming goofy looking mothers on the planet who think "man girls didn't like me no matter how desperately I acted, must have been because I wasn't obnoxious enough."


Sad but true.  But mostly sad.
 
2014-03-04 03:15:52 PM  

Grungehamster: Ironically, he himself has suggested he might seek asylum in China due to all this PC-ism gone amok in America where you can't voice certain opinions in this country anymore without being ostracized.

That's right: traveling to China to finally have freedom of expression.


Hmm.  I think I'm getting a psychic vision... I see... I predict a future in which getting called a gwai lo and suffering a beating does not change his stance on racism and discrimination.
 
2014-03-04 03:16:43 PM  

God-is-a-Taco: Grungehamster:
Didn't you read his article? White people harbor no racial animus or ill will and would be perfectly willing to treat everyone equally.

You meant this facetiously, but you're correct.
What other group of people welcomes extremely large and unsustainable amounts of outsiders of various cultures and ethnicities (firefox spellcheck is saying that's not a word?) into their country?


We had to kill a lot of racists to get here and things look perfectly sustainable to me.
 
2014-03-04 03:17:11 PM  

God-is-a-Taco: Grungehamster:
Didn't you read his article? White people harbor no racial animus or ill will and would be perfectly willing to treat everyone equally.

You meant this facetiously, but you're correct.
What other group of people welcomes extremely large and unsustainable amounts of outsiders of various cultures and ethnicities (firefox spellcheck is saying that's not a word?) into their country? Where is better to be a minority?
For god's sake, stop holding white people to standards far above what is demanded of others.
You're getting your wish, anyway. White numbers are declining worldwide and the West will be multicultural, and by that I mean monocultural.


4.bp.blogspot.com

Buh-bye.
 
2014-03-04 03:27:46 PM  

Danger Mouse: HotWingConspiracy: Danger Mouse: netizencain: Mainstream GOP kicked this guy out.  He now writes for a white supremacist group. I wouldn't call him right-wing columnist... more like neo-nazi blogger

This.

Did  you notice the trolly fark headline was word for word the Raw Story headline?  Liberals honestly want to belive thier trolly headlines are true.  You know, if you repeat it enough,...

It doesn't really change the fact that they were happy with his racist scribblings until very recently, and the only reason they dumped him is because liberals pointed out how insane he was.

Really? I cant say I am very familliar with Derbyshire, but it seems the articles in question were not even published in the NRO. Irregardless, my point was  I've come to expect trolly headlines from Fark, but Raw Story looses any legitimacy when they just troll the liberal bottom feeders with a headline that implies this racist douche is a conservatie collumnist.  Hell, it's like saying Hitler was a progreesive.


i18.photobucket.com
 
2014-03-04 03:29:57 PM  
Meh, if I got my panties in a wad everytime a republican said something racist, I'd be walking like this.
 
2014-03-04 03:32:54 PM  
If it walks like a racist and talks like a racist than it is a racist.
 
2014-03-04 03:38:04 PM  

Danger Mouse: HotWingConspiracy: Danger Mouse: HotWingConspiracy: Danger Mouse: netizencain: Mainstream GOP kicked this guy out.  He now writes for a white supremacist group. I wouldn't call him right-wing columnist... more like neo-nazi blogger

This.

Did  you notice the trolly fark headline was word for word the Raw Story headline?  Liberals honestly want to belive thier trolly headlines are true.  You know, if you repeat it enough,...

It doesn't really change the fact that they were happy with his racist scribblings until very recently, and the only reason they dumped him is because liberals pointed out how insane he was.

Really? I cant say I am very familliar with Derbyshire, but it seems the articles in question were not even published in the NRO. Irregardless, my point was  I've come to expect trolly headlines from Fark, but Raw Story looses any legitimacy when they just troll the liberal bottom feeders with a headline that implies this racist douche is a conservatie collumnist.  Hell, it's like saying Hitler was a progreesive.

But he is a conservative columnist. A crappy one that main streamers now shun, but he's still a conservative columnist.

Sure thing my friend.


Right wing? Check.
Columnist? Check.
Urging GOP to abandon minority and woman outreach? Check.

What is your complaint again? That douchebags like this soil your good party name?
 
2014-03-04 03:39:29 PM  

jaytkay: Has anyone mentioned Derbyshire's published columns about sexy, sexy, fifteen-year old girls?

Creepy, creepy guy


No they haven't. Links, please.

Please tell me he wasn't daft enough to archive them.

/Peter Griffin refused to comment, even he has that much class
 
2014-03-04 03:40:01 PM  
 the future of the conservative movement is as a home for white ethnocentrism

RNC: Shhhh!  You're not supposed to say that out loud.
 
2014-03-04 03:40:11 PM  

namatad: xria: Teufelaffe: Is it possible to evolve if one doesn't believe in evolution?

The good thing about science is that it works whether you believe in it or not.


/apart from the placebo effect I guess

You could argue that the placebo effect is actually science.
We dont understand completely how it works, but positive thinking, the idea that you are getting medicine and will get better soon probably has a positive effect on stress hormones, which leads to improved immunological response. etc etc etc

so we dont know how it works, but it is still science


Actually the placebo effect has been pretty thoroughly debunked. Apparently the results from the initial study were so striking nobody bothered to try to duplicate them. When they did, they found that the placebo "recoveries" could be explained by the fact that many people simply recover from illness without any medication at all. In the initial study, some people got efficacious medicine, some got a placebo, and the placebo patients who recovered were counted as beneficiaries of the placebo effect rather than as reasonably healthy people who simply got better on their own. If the original researchers had divided their subjects into three groups--medication recipients, placebo recipients, and nothing recipients--rather than two, the lack of a specific placebo effect would ave been readily apparent, and generations of Kubler-Ross groupies would have had to find something to write their dissertations about.
 
2014-03-04 03:41:18 PM  

God-is-a-Taco: Grungehamster:
Didn't you read his article? White people harbor no racial animus or ill will and would be perfectly willing to treat everyone equally.

You meant this facetiously, but you're correct.
What other group of people welcomes extremely large and unsustainable amounts of outsiders of various cultures and ethnicities (firefox spellcheck is saying that's not a word?) into their country? Where is better to be a minority?
For god's sake, stop holding white people to standards far above what is demanded of others.
You're getting your wish, anyway. White numbers are declining worldwide and the West will be multicultural, and by that I mean monocultural.


Oh thank you so much, White People, for letting all those "unsustainable" minorities into your country!

I'm a minority and part time resident in Peru, and I get treated fantastically well there.  Better than Peruvians do here.
 
2014-03-04 03:47:34 PM  
First, it's far more difficult to believe that conservatives don't already agree with that author, than it is to believe that some of them disagree.
Second, for someone who infers that he is somehow an alpha male, he comes across as deluded at best.
Third, his mate being Asian reminds me of one of my subcons who married a subservient, off-the-boat Asian woman because "American women are too uppity."

All that being written, he seems to be one of the most studly, open-minded, Alpha-type conservative in the US.

/yes, they are all soft, dough-faced pussies
 
2014-03-04 03:48:21 PM  

ManateeGag: How's that outreach coming?

bottom line, if they only cater to the white voters, they will not win elections.


not without voter suppression and gerrymandering, neither of which they would stoop to.
 
2014-03-04 03:49:09 PM  

rosebud_the_sled: First, it's far more difficult to believe that conservatives don't already agree with that author, than it is to believe that some of them disagree.
Second, for someone who infers that he is somehow an alpha male, he comes across as deluded at best.
Third, his mate being Asian reminds me of one of my subcons who married a subservient, off-the-boat Asian woman because "American women are too uppity."

All that being written, he seems to be one of the most studly, open-minded, Alpha-type conservative in the US.

/yes, they are all soft, dough-faced pussies



Mmmm, soft, dough-faced pussy.
 
2014-03-04 03:50:17 PM  
The left-leaning folks here are going to condescend about this, but I don't see how the left's tendency towards thinly veiled disdain for white males is morally superior.
 
2014-03-04 03:50:47 PM  
This is embarrassing.  If you find yourself dabbling in any kind of supremacism (white supremacism, black supremacism, Eskimo supremacism), your life has gone off the rails.  You need rehab.
 
2014-03-04 03:52:56 PM  

IrishFarmer: The left-leaning folks here are going to condescend about this, but I don't see how the left's tendency towards thinly veiled disdain for white males is morally superior.


I'm a white male and a leftist, I don't know what you're talking about.
 
2014-03-04 03:53:42 PM  
Lord_Baull

 .

Right wing? Check.
Columnist? Check.
Urging GOP to abandon minority and woman outreach? Check.

What is your complaint again? That douchebags like this soil your good party name?


Yup.
 
2014-03-04 03:53:49 PM  

Danger Mouse: netizencain: Mainstream GOP kicked this guy out.  He now writes for a white supremacist group. I wouldn't call him right-wing columnist... more like neo-nazi blogger

This.

Did  you notice the trolly fark headline was word for word the Raw Story headline?  Liberals honestly want to belive thier trolly headlines are true.  You know, if you repeat it enough,...


You know, as a liberal, I came here to point out that he wasn't a mainstream conservative, and that he really didn't represent the bulk of the conservative viewpoint.

But since you decided to get al ad-hominum on liberals, how about this instead:

This is the sort of people you have voting along side you, supporting the same policies you do. Don't you feel dirty now? Why hasn't your party loudly denounced these idiots and said "there is no room for racism in our party", but instead constantly makes noises about welfare mothers and minorities who take and take but never give back. Just because you aren't naming brown people explicitly doesn't me you are fooling anyone.

/and bite me
 
2014-03-04 03:58:02 PM  

HotWingConspiracy: IrishFarmer: The left-leaning folks here are going to condescend about this, but I don't see how the left's tendency towards thinly veiled disdain for white males is morally superior.

I'm a white male and a leftist, I don't know what you're talking about.


The soft racism of self-hatred?

// I'm in the same boat as you, HotWings
 
2014-03-04 03:58:16 PM  
HotWingConspiracy:
We had to kill a lot of racists to get here and things look perfectly sustainable to me.

It's not sustainable. We have to solve the issue about caring for the elderly now instead of simply importing people to tax, and then importing people to tax to take care of them and so on.
Japan is innovating with robotics and automation to deal with their aging population, but the West is simply using imported labor from the third world because research and machines cost money that could better be placed in a secret account in the Cayman Islands. The common man receives no gain from this, but the rich get richer and everyone is convinced it's racist to question it.

BMulligan:
[4.bp.blogspot.com image 480x568]


.img.fark.net
I, too, think dialogue should be confined to images.
 
2014-03-04 03:58:55 PM  

Zasteva: Danger Mouse: netizencain: Mainstream GOP kicked this guy out.  He now writes for a white supremacist group. I wouldn't call him right-wing columnist... more like neo-nazi blogger

This.

Did  you notice the trolly fark headline was word for word the Raw Story headline?  Liberals honestly want to belive thier trolly headlines are true.  You know, if you repeat it enough,...

You know, as a liberal, I came here to point out that he wasn't a mainstream conservative, and that he really didn't represent the bulk of the conservative viewpoint.

But since you decided to get al ad-hominum on liberals, how about this instead:

This is the sort of people you have voting along side you, supporting the same policies you do. Don't you feel dirty now? Why hasn't your party loudly denounced these idiots and said "there is no room for racism in our party", but instead constantly makes noises about welfare mothers and minorities who take and take but never give back. Just because you aren't naming brown people explicitly doesn't me you are fooling anyone.

/and bite me


welcometofark.gif
 
2014-03-04 04:00:25 PM  

Danger Mouse: Lord_Baull

 .

Right wing? Check.
Columnist? Check.
Urging GOP to abandon minority and woman outreach? Check.

What is your complaint again? That douchebags like this soil your good party name?

Yup.



Then step off FARK, and direct your anger in the proper direction.
 
2014-03-04 04:01:17 PM  

IrishFarmer: the left's tendency towards thinly veiled disdain for white males


www.keepcalmstudio.com
 
2014-03-04 04:01:45 PM  
There is probably a THING known as mainstream conservatism.  We know Bill Kristol, George Will, Pat Buchanan, Thomas Sowell, Charles Krauthammer, etc.  But I've never heard of Derbyshire - so, he may not fall into the category of mainstream conservatism.  I'm not a conservative - but I understand the desire to not have folks tell me who's on my "team" as it were.  These guys can irritate me, but they can, from time to time, provide an argument that has merit - and thus gives me pause to consider.

That said, this guy is pretty run of the mill for this sort of crap - and the quality is, as someone stated, more like a blogger.  It's not really hard to write that sort of stuff - it's hard to do it and make it stand on it's own merit - for reasons other than making the writer feel good about himself.  To pass the sniff test, the arguments must contain veracity that can be tied to facts or better facts to generate future conclusions.  When you talk racist, and want it to apeal to someone beyond yourself (or an acolyte) you'd better bring facts.  Alpha male is subjective and can't be measured - it's a useless concept.  When you define "ignore" as "transcend", it's because you can't provide additional supporting facts. White European is a very unprecise definition - but I didn't delve into how that category was derived. It is simple writing for simple minded.

I've been intrigued that so few conservatives can identify those issues for which they stand that can be reasonably argued.  I'd be genuinely interested in hearing (a) arguments about conservative financial principals - how calling on "market forces" (that don't put a thumb on the scales) can actually improve the country and (b) how federal programs could be better managed at the state level.  I think there may be some good arguments - but recently the marketplace of ideas has been pretty one-sided.  I would like to hear someone standup for quantitative analysis about how to end federal programs (how do we know when a program has either succeeded or outlived it's usefulness - and can thus be terminated). Good policy needs better argumentatitve process to ensure the outcome is not one-sided and overreaching.
 
2014-03-04 04:03:52 PM  

IrishFarmer: The left-leaning folks here are going to condescend about this, but I don't see how the left's tendency towards thinly veiled disdain for white males people in a place of privilege who not only refuse to acknowledge their privilege, they attempt to play the victim whenever said privilege is mentioned to them is morally superior.


FTFY
 
2014-03-04 04:03:58 PM  

IrishFarmer: The left-leaning folks here are going to condescend about this, but I don't see how the left's tendency towards thinly veiled disdain for white males is morally superior.


I think that you're seeing that many of the villains of the right are white males, and they are all targets of leftist ire. So it's easy to think the left dislikes white men.

But just look at the previous presidential candidates from the left - John Kerry, Al Gore, Ralph Nader, Bill Clinton, Michael Dukakis, etc... You should see that the left harbors no racism against whites nor sexism against males.
 
2014-03-04 04:05:11 PM  

Danger Mouse: What is your complaint again? That douchebags like this soil your good party name?

Yup.


Well then you needn't complain.

Everyone already knows that your party is the party of bigotry, sexism and racism.  Whether it's this guy (who you've never heard of) saying so or whether it's Sarah Palin (who you never heard of and/or never liked) insisting America is a Christian nation or whether it's Arizona GOP (who you've never heard of) penning anti-gay legislation or whether it's Rush Limbaugh (who you've never heard of) insisting that 12 Years a Slave only won because the world is biased against white men or whether it's Michelle Bachmann (who you have never heard of) insisting that Hillary Clinton's not-white associate must be a terrorist or whether it's any number of GOP elected officials and candidates (who i'm sure you have never heard of) discussing rape from within their insulated bubbles....

I can keep going if you like.  The point is that this bigot (who you never heard of) isn't soiling your good party name.  The bigots who make up the majority of your party are what is spoiling your good party name.
 
2014-03-04 04:07:56 PM  

Danger Mouse: Lord_Baull

 .

Right wing? Check.
Columnist? Check.
Urging GOP to abandon minority and woman outreach? Check.

What is your complaint again? That douchebags like this soil your good party name?

Yup.


Oh hey, there you are! Ever come up with a source that only 16 of the 92 programs studied in Paul Ryan's report are effective? You disappeared from the thread where you were supposed to link to it.
 
2014-03-04 04:12:55 PM  

Danger Mouse: netizencain: Mainstream GOP kicked this guy out.  He now writes for a white supremacist group. I wouldn't call him right-wing columnist... more like neo-nazi blogger

This.

Did  you notice the trolly fark headline was word for word the Raw Story headline?  Liberals honestly want to belive thier trolly headlines are true.  You know, if you repeat it enough,...


How dare liberals quote people!
 
2014-03-04 04:13:46 PM  

TheShavingofOccam123: [www.rawstory.com image 546x307]

"Look on my works, ye whitey, and despair."


Where is that cartoon about white supremecists having weak chins when I need it?
 
2014-03-04 04:14:22 PM  

HotWingConspiracy: IrishFarmer: The left-leaning folks here are going to condescend about this, but I don't see how the left's tendency towards thinly veiled disdain for white males is morally superior.

I'm a white male and a leftist, I don't know what you're talking about.


He's actually talking about lack of respect for people who were born on third base and think they hit a triple - who, mostly, in America, happen to be white males. But implying that it's somehow ethnocentric in nature sounds better from his perspective.
 
2014-03-04 04:17:52 PM  
Sorry, piss and moan all you want, the GOP owns assholes like this. Conservative philosophy (such as it is) attracts these clowns, and for a very long time, the GOP has been encouraging and coddling these folks. If you don't think a good percentage of self-identified conservatives/Republicans agree with this idiot, you're deluding yourself.
 
2014-03-04 04:18:31 PM  

DROxINxTHExWIND: TheShavingofOccam123: [www.rawstory.com image 546x307]

"Look on my works, ye whitey, and despair."

Where is that cartoon about white supremecists having weak chins when I need it?


i18.photobucket.com
 
Displayed 50 of 220 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report