Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(ABC News)   Police launch statewide investigation of pictures of naked teen girls, promise to continue a full and thorough investigation until they're either completely exhausted or the chafing prevents them from continuing   (abcnews.go.com ) divider line
    More: Obvious, North Carolina, Instagram, Rowan County, teen girls, investigation, state bureau of investigation, WSOC-TV, air launch  
•       •       •

7393 clicks; posted to Main » on 03 Mar 2014 at 1:23 PM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



59 Comments   (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-03-03 05:42:17 PM  
I wonder if "momma bear" who called the cops realizes that by calling the cops not one less teenage boy will see the pics but many many more cops will see pics of her precious snowflake ho.
 
2014-03-03 05:43:06 PM  
FTFA:  Meanwhile, Rowan County Sheriff's deputies say they were able to back-track an Instagram photograph of a naked 15-year-old girl to Juan Bautista, 17, a student at West Rowan High School.

While I understand their withholding of the 15-year-old girl's name, I'm fairly surprised at their publishing of the 17-year-old boy's name.

I also find their usage of hyphens questionable.  I mimicked it, but it was tough.

Also, I didn't check as to the age of consent in NC.  Don't most states have an age of consent that is less than 18?  I enjoy where a kid is old enough to consent to getting farked, but not old enough to consent to being photographed.
 
2014-03-03 06:05:57 PM  

Coconice: FTFA:  Meanwhile, Rowan County Sheriff's deputies say they were able to back-track an Instagram photograph of a naked 15-year-old girl to Juan Bautista, 17, a student at West Rowan High School.

While I understand their withholding of the 15-year-old girl's name, I'm fairly surprised at their publishing of the 17-year-old boy's name.

I also find their usage of hyphens questionable.  I mimicked it, but it was tough.

Also, I didn't check as to the age of consent in NC.  Don't most states have an age of consent that is less than 18?  I enjoy where a kid is old enough to consent to getting farked, but not old enough to consent to being photographed.


Ha! You think that's something?

At 18 you can also join the military, lose a limb or 2, get PTSD and kill some brown people, but woe is you if you have a beer afterwards.
 
2014-03-03 09:20:45 PM  

Pangea: I have to deal with a non-violent felony on my record from almost 25 years ago, every time I seek new employment. I have changed immeasurably from when I was 18, but I will carry that burden for the rest of my life.


Maybe not.  Check this out, you may be eligible to have it expunged.
 
2014-03-03 10:09:42 PM  
This yhread is useless without.... Oh hello Chris Hansen. How can I help you?
 
2014-03-04 01:10:38 AM  

The Stealth Hippopotamus: ugh. Why did it have to be teenage girls? I have to at least be able to fool myself into thinking they are old enough to drink legally

[img829.imageshack.us image 680x396]


Pretend they're in Italy, it's 16 to drink there.
 
2014-03-04 06:06:22 AM  

DarkVader: Pangea: I have to deal with a non-violent felony on my record from almost 25 years ago, every time I seek new employment. I have changed immeasurably from when I was 18, but I will carry that burden for the rest of my life.

Maybe not.  Check this out, you may be eligible to have it expunged.


Time for some research. Thanks for the link!
 
2014-03-04 01:10:05 PM  

Boo_Guy: IRQ12: Add a byte to the mac address and have an identifier for adult or non adult NICs.  Server and client side.

Sorry kids, you're ruining this for everyone.

Yea cause its totally not really easy to spoof a MAC address,  no sir.


Well, and not to mention that remote (non-LAN) servers would have no farking clue what your MAC address was in the first place... (Unless you happened to be using auto-generated IPv6 addresses that incorporated the MAC into the lower 64 bits...)
 
2014-03-04 04:45:50 PM  

Luse: Latinwolf: Electromax: Pangea: Electromax: orbister: Target Builder: Distributing naked photos of anyone when they don't want you to is a major dick move.

Sending naked photographs of yourself to someone else is a cretinously stupid thing to do, and anything which happens as a result is your own damn fault.

You can shout that into the face of every 15 year old on the planet, but they're still 15.

No one is arguing that 15-year-olds aren't stupid.

I think the only real question is whether or not it is fair to hold the boys who forward the pictures to a higher standard than the girls who actually take the pictures in the first place.

It's absurd to me that the boys should be punished for sharing something that wouldn't exist without the actions of the "innocent" party.

I agree in principle, but also feel compelled to mention that the girls are punished in part merely by the action itself, and consequently being naked on the internet for the rest of time, whereas the boys really don't have any consequences aside from getting broken up with if they aren't punished by someone else.

It's a fuzzy line, but for a lot of people it's probably "hasn't she suffered enough already/the punishment of having your pics out there is worse than anything I could do" mentality. Basically let her learn her lesson that way, but the boys aren't perceived to have learned a lesson unless they see a negative outcome.

Really the mistake is trusting a 15-year-old with something that will exist forever and is not easy to get otherwise. But I'm sure she was positive it was True Love 4 Life.

I'm guessing that a majority of the guys that are saying that she should be punished would have no problem if she was the only one being punished and that the guy distributing the pics was allowed to get away with it.

You're guessing wrong.
If charges for distribution are brought up, both her and the boys should face them. She was the first one to distribute.
In addition she also produced the materia ...


So you're holding her tp a higher standard than you're holding the guy.
 
Displayed 9 of 59 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report