Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Mirror.co.uk)   Maybe this female teacher regrets bedding the teenager, but one is sure that said teenager doesn't feel the same way   (mirror.co.uk ) divider line
    More: Followup, Remembrance Day, physical relationship  
•       •       •

30725 clicks; posted to Main » on 02 Mar 2014 at 11:04 AM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



71 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2014-03-02 08:45:59 AM  
i.imgur.com tag off shacking up with some student?
 
2014-03-02 08:51:54 AM  
And by bedding, you mean sleeping in the same bed but not having sex with. Also, his dad sounds like a real winner.
 
2014-03-02 09:12:27 AM  
Reading it, I *almost* felt bad for her, then got to the photo of the teenager, who looked like he was about ten years old to me.  The woman is a straight up pedophile and belongs in jail.

I've had plenty of rough times in my life, but I didn't start kissing and obsessing over a child as a result. Sorry her life sucks, but most of us just get drunk or watch a movie or something when shiat hits the fan.
 
2014-03-02 10:11:17 AM  
So she's the victim.  Why isn't the little asshat in jail?  Try him as an adult while we're at it.

If a male teacher came out with this shameful fanfic, he wouldn't survive 24 hours.
 
2014-03-02 10:28:32 AM  

AngryDragon: So she's the victim.  Why isn't the little asshat in jail?  Try him as an adult while we're at it.

If a male teacher came out with this shameful fanfic, he wouldn't survive 24 hours.


His father also should be facing some consequences since he was just fine with his child "dating" a 35-year-old woman.  And for her to claim it was all because she was having a rough time... the lady is sick in the head.  I know he is a teenager, but he looks so incredibly young.

And you're right, if it was a male, people would have torches alight and pitchforks raised high.
 
2014-03-02 11:06:54 AM  
www.partyvibe.org
 
2014-03-02 11:07:31 AM  

serpent_sky: Reading it, I *almost* felt bad for her, then got to the photo of the teenager, who looked like he was about ten years old to me.  The woman is a straight up pedophile and belongs in jail.

I've had plenty of rough times in my life, but I didn't start kissing and obsessing over a child as a result. Sorry her life sucks, but most of us just get drunk or watch a movie or something when shiat hits the fan.


If it makes you feel any better I will dress up in an English school boys uniform, and we can just "cuddle".
 
2014-03-02 11:09:17 AM  
That kid has the COOLEST ROOM POSTERS.
 
2014-03-02 11:10:05 AM  

Since when do we take into account the feelings of the kid during pedophilia investigations?

It's pedophilia. The idea that it's more "acceptable" because it's adult female/child male pedophilia is farking repugnant.
 
2014-03-02 11:12:33 AM  
Next up on Jerry Springer, "Opie porks a skank!"
 
2014-03-02 11:13:54 AM  
Swap the sexes, and/or make them both male and there'd be a lynching mob.
 
2014-03-02 11:15:32 AM  
So a re-post of the same story from the other day, except without the less flattering pics of the teacher.
 
2014-03-02 11:18:58 AM  
He wasn't harmed and his dad did give permission.
 
2014-03-02 11:19:27 AM  

swingbozo: Swap the sexes, and/or make them both male and there'd be a lynching mob.


This, obviously. The persistent double standard when it comes to such things is appalling.
 
2014-03-02 11:19:52 AM  
I know it's just me, but it seems like the headlines are getting more and more incomprehensible, as the subbys strain harder and harder to be clever.
/you are not amusing. really. just stop it.
 
2014-03-02 11:22:27 AM  
I read way too much to find out that bedding was two kisses. Jesus, what a pussy.
 
2014-03-02 11:24:37 AM  

serpent_sky: AngryDragon: So she's the victim.  Why isn't the little asshat in jail?  Try him as an adult while we're at it.

If a male teacher came out with this shameful fanfic, he wouldn't survive 24 hours.

His father also should be facing some consequences since he was just fine with his child "dating" a 35-year-old woman.  And for her to claim it was all because she was having a rough time... the lady is sick in the head.  I know he is a teenager, but he looks so incredibly young.

And you're right, if it was a male, people would have torches alight and pitchforks raised high.


That's because people are stupid. Most people have had sex by the time they turn 18. If they use birth control, it's not bad for them. He's not going to wind up with PTSD because his girlfriend was way too old for him. You see those posters? Those are the posters of a teenager with raging hormones who WANTS to have sex, and thinks about it all the time. He's not a "child" being preyed upon by a monster, he's just a horny kid who got a bit more in the way of a hot girlfriend than was good for him.
 
2014-03-02 11:25:47 AM  

swingbozo: Swap the sexes, and/or make them both male and there'd be a lynching mob.


Come on, everyone knows m-m is the "DO NOT WANT" reply.

Time to bust out the old chart so you can get it right...

img.fark.net
 
2014-03-02 11:29:30 AM  

FormlessOne: Since when do we take into account the feelings of the kid during pedophilia investigations?It's pedophilia. The idea that it's more "acceptable" because it's adult female/child male pedophilia is farking repugnant.


Once again, it's not pedophilia when the target is past puberty. That's ephebophilia. Pedophilia is an unnatural sexual interest in pre-pubescent children, while ephebophilia is an interest in adolescents who have been through puberty. There's a big difference there, and it's an important one.

When someone victimizes a child who has not even experienced puberty, they're shattering innocence, victimizing a child who has no interest in sex, and it is without any doubt, in any civilized society, a heinous crime.

When an arbitrarily-designated adult (over 18) or a person in a position of authority (teacher) victimizes a teenager who has been through puberty, it's still a crime, but it's not the destruction of innocence that pedophilia is, and despite the fact that the younger party has no legal right to consent, the fact is that they  do  give consent and it can be argued they may have even instigated the contact, while the pre-pubescent child is not likely to consent to something that is unnatural, gross, and scary to them.

Both are crimes. One is a clear victimization of a child while the other is merely an abuse of authority that is treated by many as if it's the victimization of a child, despite the fact that the adolescent in question has made it clear that they sought, enjoyed, and repeatedly partook of the sexual contact with the authority figure in question.

In short, statutory rape is way too subjective and arbitrary to call it the same thing as pedophilia. It's still wrong, tacky, and not very responsible, but it's no where near the victimization or corruption of innocence that actual pedophilia is, and it weakens the meaning of "pedophilia" when you apply it to eager, horny, post-pubescent 16-year-olds.

Is it an abuse of authority? Oh hell yes. But it's not the corruption of a child that pedophilia is. I think the distinctions should be respected. Words have power and meaning. Use the right ones to get your meaning across.

All that being said, this teen actually DOES look like a 10-year-old, and that makes me wonder if he wasn't a convenient "halfway" mark for someone who is a pedophile, but wanted to try to be "more legit" from the legal sense. Her motives are questionable simply because anyone who would be attracted to that boy, who does NOT look like he has made it out of puberty yet, has some issues with children.

So this one's a real mess, is what I'm saying.
 
2014-03-02 11:31:16 AM  
This is repetered.
 
2014-03-02 11:36:24 AM  
She's way too hot for her ex hubby.
 
2014-03-02 11:44:40 AM  
Has anybody pointed out that it'd be different if the student was female and the teacher a male? Because that should be considered also.
 
2014-03-02 11:44:52 AM  

Nix Nightbird: FormlessOne: Since when do we take into account the feelings of the kid during pedophilia investigations?It's pedophilia. The idea that it's more "acceptable" because it's adult female/child male pedophilia is farking repugnant.

Once again, it's not pedophilia when the target is past puberty. That's ephebophilia. Pedophilia is an unnatural sexual interest in pre-pubescent children, while ephebophilia is an interest in adolescents who have been through puberty. There's a big difference there, and it's an important one.

When someone victimizes a child who has not even experienced puberty, they're shattering innocence, victimizing a child who has no interest in sex, and it is without any doubt, in any civilized society, a heinous crime.

When an arbitrarily-designated adult (over 18) or a person in a position of authority (teacher) victimizes a teenager who has been through puberty, it's still a crime, but it's not the destruction of innocence that pedophilia is, and despite the fact that the younger party has no legal right to consent, the fact is that they  do  give consent and it can be argued they may have even instigated the contact, while the pre-pubescent child is not likely to consent to something that is unnatural, gross, and scary to them.

Both are crimes. One is a clear victimization of a child while the other is merely an abuse of authority that is treated by many as if it's the victimization of a child, despite the fact that the adolescent in question has made it clear that they sought, enjoyed, and repeatedly partook of the sexual contact with the authority figure in question.

In short, statutory rape is way too subjective and arbitrary to call it the same thing as pedophilia. It's still wrong, tacky, and not very responsible, but it's no where near the victimization or corruption of innocence that actual pedophilia is, and it weakens the meaning of "pedophilia" when you apply it to eager, horny, post-pubescent 16-year-olds.

Is it an abuse of authori ...


Ephebophilia, then. Still illegal, still a problem.
 
2014-03-02 11:49:23 AM  

mbillips: serpent_sky: AngryDragon: So she's the victim.  Why isn't the little asshat in jail?  Try him as an adult while we're at it.

If a male teacher came out with this shameful fanfic, he wouldn't survive 24 hours.

His father also should be facing some consequences since he was just fine with his child "dating" a 35-year-old woman.  And for her to claim it was all because she was having a rough time... the lady is sick in the head.  I know he is a teenager, but he looks so incredibly young.

And you're right, if it was a male, people would have torches alight and pitchforks raised high.

That's because people are stupid. Most people have had sex by the time they turn 18. If they use birth control, it's not bad for them. He's not going to wind up with PTSD because his girlfriend was way too old for him. You see those posters? Those are the posters of a teenager with raging hormones who WANTS to have sex, and thinks about it all the time. He's not a "child" being preyed upon by a monster, he's just a horny kid who got a bit more in the way of a hot girlfriend than was good for him.


So you're fine with a 35 yo teacher farking a 16 yo girl. You are, right?
 
2014-03-02 11:50:55 AM  

Savage Belief: She's way too hot for her ex hubby.


Evidently, this didn't keep him from screwing around on her - multiple times. At one point she was even paying for a baby of his that was born over a year after they got married.

Low self esteem much?

That being said, this kid looks like he is 10. This is gross and weird.
 
2014-03-02 11:57:42 AM  
Yeah, I hit that.

i4.dailyrecord.co.uk

Think about that while you sex up your crusty sock.
 
2014-03-02 11:57:51 AM  

Killroy69: mbillips: serpent_sky: AngryDragon: So she's the victim.  Why isn't the little asshat in jail?  Try him as an adult while we're at it.

If a male teacher came out with this shameful fanfic, he wouldn't survive 24 hours.

His father also should be facing some consequences since he was just fine with his child "dating" a 35-year-old woman.  And for her to claim it was all because she was having a rough time... the lady is sick in the head.  I know he is a teenager, but he looks so incredibly young.

And you're right, if it was a male, people would have torches alight and pitchforks raised high.

That's because people are stupid. Most people have had sex by the time they turn 18. If they use birth control, it's not bad for them. He's not going to wind up with PTSD because his girlfriend was way too old for him. You see those posters? Those are the posters of a teenager with raging hormones who WANTS to have sex, and thinks about it all the time. He's not a "child" being preyed upon by a monster, he's just a horny kid who got a bit more in the way of a hot girlfriend than was good for him.

So you're fine with a 35 yo teacher farking a 16 yo girl. You are, right?


That depends entirely on the people involved. For example, is the girl hot? And if so, is the 35-year-old me?
 
2014-03-02 12:08:51 PM  
I don't really get why people are freaking out about this being pedophilia. The age of consent in the UK is 16 so this relationship would have been legal if she hadn't been in a position of authority. While most of us would have ethical issues with this arrangement, I really don't think it's fair to label her a child molester.

Also, the real villain in this story is the boy because he couldn't resist bragging about banging a 35 year old to his grandmother.
 
2014-03-02 12:09:03 PM  
Something tells me this story has been "Travon-ed".  Let's find a picture of the victim from 8 years ago that depicts them as sweetly and innocently as possible.  The guy is probably a pimple faced 6'3" 210 stud.
 
2014-03-02 12:18:01 PM  

Jack_Knopf: Something tells me this story has been "Travon-ed".  Let's find a picture of the victim from 8 years ago that depicts them as sweetly and innocently as possible.  The guy is probably a pimple faced 6'3" 210 stud.


Are you gay?  It's the only explanation I can think of to account for your not seeing the posters behind him on the wall.  That and the Bob Marley posters...I think if they were trying to get a picture "depict[ing him] as sweetly and innocently as possible " they'd start by removing said posters, and maybe cleaning up his room.  In fact, I'm 99.99% certain those posters and that mess was 100% staged, and isn't normally there.
 
2014-03-02 12:27:10 PM  
RECEIVED A FAKE POPUP ATTACK FROM THAT WEBSITE.

Lucky for me my Anti-Virus software captured it.


Thanks,  Mirror


Piece of excrement.
 
2014-03-02 12:41:42 PM  

Killroy69: mbillips: serpent_sky: AngryDragon: So she's the victim.  Why isn't the little asshat in jail?  Try him as an adult while we're at it.

If a male teacher came out with this shameful fanfic, he wouldn't survive 24 hours.

His father also should be facing some consequences since he was just fine with his child "dating" a 35-year-old woman.  And for her to claim it was all because she was having a rough time... the lady is sick in the head.  I know he is a teenager, but he looks so incredibly young.

And you're right, if it was a male, people would have torches alight and pitchforks raised high.

That's because people are stupid. Most people have had sex by the time they turn 18. If they use birth control, it's not bad for them. He's not going to wind up with PTSD because his girlfriend was way too old for him. You see those posters? Those are the posters of a teenager with raging hormones who WANTS to have sex, and thinks about it all the time. He's not a "child" being preyed upon by a monster, he's just a horny kid who got a bit more in the way of a hot girlfriend than was good for him.

So you're fine with a 35 yo teacher farking a 16 yo girl. You are, right?


I don't think it's a good idea, and I think people should discourage it, but it ain't child rape. It doesn't make me angry, just makes me go, "sigh, little girl, use your brain." I wouldn't invite the 35-year-old for cocktails, but I wouldn't join a lynch mob against him.
 
2014-03-02 12:42:17 PM  

IamAwake: Jack_Knopf: Something tells me this story has been "Travon-ed".  Let's find a picture of the victim from 8 years ago that depicts them as sweetly and innocently as possible.  The guy is probably a pimple faced 6'3" 210 stud.

Are you gay?  It's the only explanation I can think of to account for your not seeing the posters behind him on the wall.  That and the Bob Marley posters...I think if they were trying to get a picture "depict[ing him] as sweetly and innocently as possible " they'd start by removing said posters, and maybe cleaning up his room.  In fact, I'm 99.99% certain those posters and that mess was 100% staged, and isn't normally there.


Sexual orientation = vision?  Okie dokie.  So what you're saying is that a male must be 16 prior to having such posters?  That makes perfect sense.
 
2014-03-02 12:43:20 PM  
Age of consent in UK is 16, kids looks young though, abuse of authority, obligatory "nice" .jpg

/end thread?
 
2014-03-02 12:49:27 PM  

Jack_Knopf: Sexual orientation = vision? Okie dokie. So what you're saying is that a male must be 16 prior to having such posters? That makes perfect sense.


You claimed they tried "depict[ing him] as sweetly and innocently as possible " in your insane comparison to Trayvon, and your obvious opinion (by blaming the victim) on that subject.  You're the nutjob that thinks it's ok to stalk and kill a kid, and who for this completely unrelated kid thinks having posters of naked women "depict[s him] as sweetly and innocently as possible."  And yes, if you didn't notice the hot women in the posters right next to him, then that does say something about your sexual orientation.  Straight men notice naked, hot women.  It's just a thing.

As far as the "not that there's anything wrong with that" - there is a problem with you blaming Trayvon, and for - despite your insane side winning - still not getting over it enough to not bring it up in an entirely unrelated conversation.
 
2014-03-02 12:52:27 PM  

Jack_Knopf: So what you're saying is that a male must be 16 prior to having such posters? That makes perfect sense.


Just to answer the troll question, which I've already answered - if they were trying to get a picture "depict[ing him] as sweetly and innocently as possible " they'd start by removing said posters, and maybe cleaning up his room. They thus didn't depict him as sweetly and innocently as possible.   You know, exactly what I said in the post to which you were responding.
 
2014-03-02 12:53:00 PM  

limeyfellow: swingbozo: Swap the sexes, and/or make them both male and there'd be a lynching mob.

Come on, everyone knows m-m is the "DO NOT WANT" reply.

Time to bust out the old chart so you can get it right...

[img.fark.net image 409x428]


Once again some people need to be reminded that men and women are very, very different.

And men got the shiatty side of that deal.

But don't be too bitter, women screw it up for themselves by picking the worst possible men to sleep with.
 
2014-03-02 01:05:47 PM  
Wow. The farking article was way tl;dr. I just clicked for the pic.

This thread is also tl;dr. Whar funny whar.

/yeah, I am part of the problem
 
2014-03-02 01:17:41 PM  

Nix Nightbird: Once again, it's not pedophilia when the target is past puberty. That's ephebophilia.


Neither the DSM-IV nor the DSM-V recognizes ephebophilia as a psychiatric or medical diagnosis. In fact, the people responsible for the DSM-V considered and rejected various proposals to increase the age of diagnosis for pedophilia from 11 to 13, or to add a new diagnosis of the kind you're talking about.

Unfortunately, I can't find the materials on the web at the moment, between lunch, talking to my boy, and farking. I can say that it's morally significant that in this day of anti-"pedophile" hysteria, where men and women who find themselves attracted to even 16 or 17 year old adolescents regularly get skewered as "pedophiles" by the media and the general public, that the relevant medical community formed no  consensus that adult sexual attraction even to early adolescents was, by itself, psychiatrically   abnormal.

I'm in no way defending sexual acts with minors. I am trying to preserve sanity in a world increasingly and stupidly at war with biology, striving to make as many people feel awful about their sexuality as possible. It's normal if you're attracted to adolescents--though it might not be if you're only attracted to  them. That doesn't mean it's okay to act on that attraction outside the realm of fantasy with a consenting adult partner.
 
2014-03-02 01:19:03 PM  
People who use "said" as an adjective need to be cockpunched.
 
2014-03-02 01:20:29 PM  

IamAwake: Jack_Knopf: Sexual orientation = vision? Okie dokie. So what you're saying is that a male must be 16 prior to having such posters? That makes perfect sense.

You're the nutjob that thinks it's ok to stalk and kill a kid


It's a good thing you have the internet between you and I right now you piece of shiat.
 
2014-03-02 01:22:34 PM  

AngryDragon: So she's the victim.  Why isn't the little asshat in jail?  Try him as an adult while we're at it.

If a male teacher came out with this shameful fanfic, he wouldn't survive 24 hours.


Rape culture at it's finest.
 
2014-03-02 02:06:15 PM  

Nix Nightbird: FormlessOne: Since when do we take into account the feelings of the kid during pedophilia investigations?It's pedophilia. The idea that it's more "acceptable" because it's adult female/child male pedophilia is farking repugnant.

Once again, it's not pedophilia when the target is past puberty. That's ephebophilia. Pedophilia is an unnatural sexual interest in pre-pubescent children, while ephebophilia is an interest in adolescents who have been through puberty. There's a big difference there, and it's an important one.

When someone victimizes a child who has not even experienced puberty, they're shattering innocence, victimizing a child who has no interest in sex, and it is without any doubt, in any civilized society, a heinous crime.

When an arbitrarily-designated adult (over 18) or a person in a position of authority (teacher) victimizes a teenager who has been through puberty, it's still a crime, but it's not the destruction of innocence that pedophilia is, and despite the fact that the younger party has no legal right to consent, the fact is that they  do  give consent and it can be argued they may have even instigated the contact, while the pre-pubescent child is not likely to consent to something that is unnatural, gross, and scary to them.

Both are crimes. One is a clear victimization of a child while the other is merely an abuse of authority that is treated by many as if it's the victimization of a child, despite the fact that the adolescent in question has made it clear that they sought, enjoyed, and repeatedly partook of the sexual contact with the authority figure in question.

In short, statutory rape is way too subjective and arbitrary to call it the same thing as pedophilia. It's still wrong, tacky, and not very responsible, but it's no where near the victimization or corruption of innocence that actual pedophilia is, and it weakens the meaning of "pedophilia" when you apply it to eager, horny, post-pubescent 16-year-olds.

Is it an abuse of authority? Oh hell yes. But it's not the corruption of a child that pedophilia is. I think the distinctions should be respected. Words have power and meaning. Use the right ones to get your meaning across.

All that being said, this teen actually DOES look like a 10-year-old, and that makes me wonder if he wasn't a convenient "halfway" mark for someone who is a pedophile, but wanted to try to be "more legit" from the legal sense. Her motives are questionable simply because anyone who would be attracted to that boy, who does NOT look like he has made it out of puberty yet, has some issues with children.

So this one's a real mess, is what I'm saying.


Gelles (University of Pennsylvania) would like a word with people who think this won't have negative effects for the kid. In his studies (which turn the common wisdom on it's head) this situation actually causes more harm than the reverse. Even he doesn't say the other is good, just less harmful than this one.

Still, let society pretend I guess.
 
2014-03-02 02:13:12 PM  
www.spyghana.com
in a couple of years?
i4.dailyrecord.co.uk
 
2014-03-02 02:19:54 PM  

Witness99: mbillips: Killroy69: mbillips: serpent_sky: AngryDragon: So she's the victim.  Why isn't the little asshat in jail?  Try him as an adult while we're at it.

If a male teacher came out with this shameful fanfic, he wouldn't survive 24 hours.

His father also should be facing some consequences since he was just fine with his child "dating" a 35-year-old woman.  And for her to claim it was all because she was having a rough time... the lady is sick in the head.  I know he is a teenager, but he looks so incredibly young.

And you're right, if it was a male, people would have torches alight and pitchforks raised high.

That's because people are stupid. Most people have had sex by the time they turn 18. If they use birth control, it's not bad for them. He's not going to wind up with PTSD because his girlfriend was way too old for him. You see those posters? Those are the posters of a teenager with raging hormones who WANTS to have sex, and thinks about it all the time. He's not a "child" being preyed upon by a monster, he's just a horny kid who got a bit more in the way of a hot girlfriend than was good for him.

So you're fine with a 35 yo teacher farking a 16 yo girl. You are, right?

I don't think it's a good idea, and I think people should discourage it, but it ain't child rape. It doesn't make me angry, just makes me go, "sigh, little girl, use your brain." I wouldn't invite the 35-year-old for cocktails, but I wouldn't join a lynch mob against him.

"Sigh, little girl, use your brain." And what, only Fark your classmates? Or use your brain and don't Fark at all, save yourself for marriage? Or, "little girl," use your brain and don't get a disease or pregnant?

Nothing changes when you go from a post puberty, sexually active young woman of 16 to a post puberty, sexually active young woman of 18 or 25. You are subject to all the pitfalls of dating and sex whatever age you start at, and there is always a learning curve. Most people enter this arena in their high school ...


This. A 35-year-old dates a 16-year-old because he's a loser who is going to exploit her and break her heart. If he's a teacher or other authority figure, he's a scumbag. Bad choice of boyfriend, regardless.
 
2014-03-02 02:24:45 PM  

Nix Nightbird: ... while ephebophilia is an interest in adolescents who have been through puberty.


I understood that ephebophilia was a preference for post-pubescent teens, not just an interest.  I'm thinking that If every guy with an 'interest' in banging hot 16 year oldd had ephebophilia, it would be a condition at epidemic levels.
 
2014-03-02 02:25:51 PM  

TheOther: Yeah, I hit that.

[i4.dailyrecord.co.uk image 615x409]

Think about that while you sex up your crusty sock.


Dammit kid.  Don't Harry and Hermione need your help somewhere?
 
2014-03-02 02:30:28 PM  

fozziewazzi: Nix Nightbird: ... while ephebophilia is an interest in adolescents who have been through puberty.

I understood that ephebophilia was a preference for post-pubescent teens, not just an interest.  I'm thinking that If every guy with an 'interest' in banging hot 16 year oldd had ephebophilia, it would be a condition at epidemic levels.


All adolescents under the age of 18 who masturbate are child molesters, QED.
 
2014-03-02 02:32:19 PM  
i.chzbgr.com
i.chzbgr.com
 
2014-03-02 03:12:17 PM  
I DRTFA yet and I'm kind of glad. The only thing I care less about than the sexual desires and satisfactions of a teenager is the woeful cries of a kiddie diddler sitting in jail. You can go ahead and rot, ya fookin coont.

/female
//of course he liked it, he's a teenager with a brain that is not yet fully formed and raging uncontrollable erections
 
Displayed 50 of 71 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter








In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report