If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(demonews)   Comcast gave $854K to Congressional Committee overseeing their merger with Time Warner. The money will be delivered two weeks from Tuesday between 1 and 4 pm   (demonews.org) divider line 121
    More: Followup, Time Warner, Comcast, mergers, U.S. Federal Communications Commission, congressional committees, campaign finance reform, media conglomerate  
•       •       •

5104 clicks; posted to Business » on 17 Feb 2014 at 1:11 PM (27 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



121 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-02-17 11:39:45 AM
Representative Greg Walden, R-Ore., Chairman of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology has received $53,000 from Comcast from January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012.
Representative John DingellD-Mich., has received $100,775 from Comcastfrom January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012 more than any other member of the House of Representatives. He is a member of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
 
2014-02-17 11:54:54 AM
I'm always amazed at how little it costs to buy a politician. How can anyone respect congressmen, when they're just a bunch of farking pikers?
 
2014-02-17 01:13:47 PM
,,, in a move that is totally not involving any sort of conflict of interest whatsoever.

None at all.

/bidness as usual
 
2014-02-17 01:15:07 PM
AT&T UVerse suddenly seems like a viable option.
 
2014-02-17 01:15:41 PM

rumpelstiltskin: I'm always amazed at how little it costs to buy a politician. How can anyone respect congressmen, when they're just a bunch of farking pikers?


When did we start respecting congressmen?
 
2014-02-17 01:15:48 PM
Is this a credible source?
 
2014-02-17 01:16:12 PM
What, no envelope?
 
2014-02-17 01:18:41 PM
Is anyone really surprised? Frankly, I feel that politicians should be forced to wear patches of their corporate sponsors on their suits; kind of like nascar.
 
2014-02-17 01:20:19 PM
I don't even know why you even bother with a government anymore.
 
2014-02-17 01:20:22 PM
And I just got my mom to get a bundle from Time Warner.

*sigh*
 
2014-02-17 01:20:40 PM
Oh FFS

Founded in February of 2014, DemoNews.org is America's source for factual, hard-hitting, progressive news of the Democratic Party.

Is this a Sponsored Link? This website JUST started.
 
2014-02-17 01:21:06 PM

Phil Moskowitz: I don't even know why you even bother with a government anymore.


The battle was lost a long time ago.  We're just still in denial.
 
2014-02-17 01:21:11 PM
And yet the liberal solution is a further consolidation of power to the federal government.
 
2014-02-17 01:21:37 PM
Subby, your headline is clearly a case of hyperbole. 1 to 4 PM is way too specific of a timeframe. 8 AM to 4PM is much more realistic.
 
2014-02-17 01:21:40 PM
www.allaccess.com
Proceed, Kabletown, just don't come looking for handouts when you go tits up.
 
2014-02-17 01:24:42 PM
This is what you farks wanted with your unlimited political donations and "corporations are people" bullshiat. Enjoy.
 
2014-02-17 01:25:52 PM

Dimensio: AT&T UVerse suddenly seems like a viable option.


I just switched to U-Verse from Comcast.  I was paying for Comcast's highest tier of Internet service and the performance was very inconsistent.  Then my year was up and they raised the price another $40 per month.  I called then and told them I was switching to U-Verse because of the cost.  Comcast said they don't compete by price but by service.  I told them their service was oversubscribed.  AMF!
 
2014-02-17 01:26:10 PM
I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you. Because this is so different from how our government is usually run. It's not like the people who we elect ostensibly as lawmakers actually spend more than half their time fundraising, so are more accurately described as fundraisers. Noooooooo...

/puke
 
2014-02-17 01:26:42 PM
In the future, I would prefer a non-descript briefcase to the sack with a dollar sign on it...
 
2014-02-17 01:26:50 PM

InterruptingQuirk: Representative Greg Walden, R-Ore., Chairman of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology has received $53,000 from Comcast from January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012.
Representative John Dingell,  D-Mich., has received $100,775 from Comcastfrom January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012 more than any other member of the House of Representatives. He is a member of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.


So which one are we supposed to be mad at? The republican right?
 
2014-02-17 01:26:57 PM
(Buzzandwoody.jpg)
Free Speech! Free Speech Everywhere!
 
2014-02-17 01:26:57 PM
media.nj.com
 
2014-02-17 01:29:04 PM

styckx: Oh FFS

Founded in February of 2014, DemoNews.org is America's source for factual, hard-hitting, progressive news of the Democratic Party.

Is this a Sponsored Link? This website JUST started.


Fark: Training wheels for the interwebz.
 
2014-02-17 01:30:27 PM

Diogenes: Phil Moskowitz: I don't even know why you even bother with a government anymore.

The battle was lost a long time ago.  We're just still in denial.


It's especially frustrating because the folks in charge have only recently started to enjoy vast riches...

upload.wikimedia.org

/that's a nice mask you got there...
//be a shame if anything happened to it
 
2014-02-17 01:32:34 PM

InterruptingQuirk: Representative Greg Walden, R-Ore., Chairman of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology has received $53,000 from Comcast from January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012.
Representative John Dingell,  D-Mich., has received $100,775 from Comcastfrom January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012 more than any other member of the House of Representatives. He is a member of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.


This is unsurprising since both parties have been equally devoted to destroying the internet.
 
2014-02-17 01:32:46 PM
Methodology: MapLight analysis of campaign contributions to members of Congress from PACs and employees of Comcast Corp., from January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012.

Comcast has 130,000 employees.

This methodology is BS.
 
2014-02-17 01:33:47 PM
Bring back scrambled porn.
 
2014-02-17 01:34:30 PM

styckx: Oh FFS

Founded in February of 2014, DemoNews.org is America's source for factual, hard-hitting, progressive news of the Democratic Party.

Is this a Sponsored Link? This website JUST started.


This is what Fark links to these days to make money: other news aggregates. It's a sponsored link, but not in the old traditional sense.
 
2014-02-17 01:34:31 PM

Dimensio: AT&T UVerse suddenly seems like a viable option.


It's great, so long as you have the fiber version. ATT's DSL sucks worse that DTV.

About half of the Louisville Metro area has the fiber installed, so you might be lucky.
 
2014-02-17 01:35:21 PM
unions give twice as much money to politicians as corporations, remember that next time you whine.
 
2014-02-17 01:35:37 PM

rumpelstiltskin: I'm always amazed at how little it costs to buy a politician. How can anyone respect congressmen, when they're just a bunch of farking pikers?


well to be fair, this is comcast money we're talking about, it's not like it would've been spent on anything other than hookers and blow anyways
 
2014-02-17 01:35:37 PM

mongbiohazard: I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you. Because this is so different from how our government is usually run. It's not like the people who we elect ostensibly as lawmakers actually spend more than half their time fundraising, so are more accurately described as fundraisers. Noooooooo...

/puke


Unless you start off very wealthy, and just buy a seat.
Of course most of the super wealthy are more inclined to buy a Senate seat.

/It's our version of the House of Lords
 
2014-02-17 01:38:36 PM

God-is-a-Taco: styckx: Oh FFS

Founded in February of 2014, DemoNews.org is America's source for factual, hard-hitting, progressive news of the Democratic Party.

Is this a Sponsored Link? This website JUST started.

This is what Fark links to these days to make money: other news aggregates. It's a sponsored link, but not in the old traditional sense.


Yup, and the actual source they linked to don't even provide a source for their information.

This is the dumbest greenlight this week and I frequent the video tab often.
 
2014-02-17 01:39:05 PM

MyRandomName: And yet the liberal solution is a further consolidation of power to the federal government.


And the conservative position is a to do nothing.  Ever.
 
2014-02-17 01:39:40 PM
Google Fiber can't come soon enough. Probably never come here though, they've already pretty much said "Fark you, Los Angeles".
 
2014-02-17 01:39:51 PM
So, why don't Comcast and this committee get punished for giving/accepting bribes?

Oh, right. Laws are for little people.
 
2014-02-17 01:39:58 PM

rumpelstiltskin: I'm always amazed at how little it costs to buy a politician. How can anyone respect congressmen, when they're just a bunch of farking pikers?


It's insane. Putting money into favorable political lobbying for your industry or business is the most efficient way of increasing profits.

I forget what article it was a couple years ago, but it was something ludicrous like a five hundred percent return on the money spent.
 
2014-02-17 01:41:14 PM

LordJiro: So, why don't Comcast and this committee get punished for giving/accepting bribes?

Oh, right. Laws are for little people.


Do you consider an employee giving a donation to a candidate of their choice a 'bribe'?
 
2014-02-17 01:41:47 PM

MyRandomName: And yet the liberal solution is a further consolidation of power to the federal government.


notsureifserious.jpg
 
2014-02-17 01:42:27 PM

styckx: God-is-a-Taco: styckx: Oh FFS

Founded in February of 2014, DemoNews.org is America's source for factual, hard-hitting, progressive news of the Democratic Party.

Is this a Sponsored Link? This website JUST started.

This is what Fark links to these days to make money: other news aggregates. It's a sponsored link, but not in the old traditional sense.

Yup, and the actual source they linked to don't even provide a source for their information.

This is the dumbest greenlight this week and I frequent the video tab often.


Try politics tab
 
2014-02-17 01:42:39 PM
Nothing like being able to literally buy your way into whatever you want to do.
 
2014-02-17 01:44:19 PM

iheartscotch: Is anyone really surprised? Frankly, I feel that politicians should be forced to wear patches of their corporate sponsors on their suits; kind of like nascar.


That's really odd.  I was thinking the same exact thing earlier today.  At least they could stop BS-ing about it.
 
2014-02-17 01:45:12 PM

rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.


The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.
 
2014-02-17 01:45:16 PM

iheartscotch: Is anyone really surprised? Frankly, I feel that politicians should be forced to wear patches of their corporate sponsors on their suits; kind of like nascar.


Jello Biafra? Is that you? :-D (It's a great idea by Jello, I'd support it!)
 
2014-02-17 01:45:32 PM
styckx:
Yup, and the actual source they linked to don't even provide a source for their information.

This is the dumbest greenlight this week and I frequent the video tab often.


At least it's not gawker this time. In about a week we'll get a link to jezebel that links to this demonews.org site.
 
2014-02-17 01:45:56 PM

clancifer: MyRandomName: And yet the liberal solution is a further consolidation of power to the federal government.

notsureifserious.jpg


Oh, he's serious.  Even when his posts are involuntary conservative spasms, which is most of the time.
 
2014-02-17 01:46:15 PM
ibdp.huluim.com[\img]
 
2014-02-17 01:46:48 PM
Obligatory

insidepulse.com
 
2014-02-17 01:47:56 PM
The payment will promptly be rescheduled on 3:58PM on the day of said delivery for the next available service window, 2 weeks following.
 
2014-02-17 01:49:42 PM

JerkStore: This is what you farks wanted with your unlimited political donations and "corporations are people" bullshiat. Enjoy.


I'm assuming by "you farks" you mean the SC since they are the ones that actually made the decision.

If not, please feel free to point the finger at the nebulous "you farkers" instead of those those who actually abuse the system, Your elected representatives who run rough shod over any sense of morality.
 
2014-02-17 01:49:45 PM
Real 'Mericans don't like you messing with their TV. We might have to resort to learnin' and readin'.

In all seriousness, Cable, Phone (wired), Cellular, and Internet are without real competition in this country. No one's offering me $9.99 all I can use like back in the heyday of dial up. Either we start cracking down on these collusions and near-monopolies or we can give up on the 21st Century.
 
2014-02-17 01:54:47 PM
They didn't stop the #1 and #2 airlines from merging (American/USAir), they didn't stop the top cable provider from merging with the top content distributor (NBCU/Comcast), they didn't stop the biggest online provider from merging with the biggest producer (AOLTimeWarner).

What makes anyone think there is any such thing as antitrust or anti-monopoly law anymore? All the companies have to do is show, on paper, that consumers might possibly win some small victory in some small area; while sweeping under the rug things like "choice", "competition", "fair markets" and any notion that monopolies are bad for business - and forcing regulators to ignore the common sense that combining, say, Comcast and Time Warner will lead to even less consumer choice (as if there is choice in ISPs now - sure, maybe if you have your own house, and if the municipality hasn't yet sold you out to one of the Big Guys).
 
2014-02-17 01:55:21 PM
net neutrality NOW.
 
2014-02-17 01:58:48 PM
img.fark.net
 
2014-02-17 02:01:10 PM

Onkel Buck: InterruptingQuirk: Representative Greg Walden, R-Ore., Chairman of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology has received $53,000 from Comcast from January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012.
Representative John Dingell,  D-Mich., has received $100,775 from Comcastfrom January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012 more than any other member of the House of Representatives. He is a member of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.

So which one are we supposed to be mad at? The republican right?



JerkStore: This is what you farks wanted with your unlimited political donations and "corporations are people" bullshiat. Enjoy.

 
2014-02-17 02:02:30 PM

MyRandomName: And yet the liberal  Democratic/Republican solution is a further consolidation of power to the federal government.


FTFY

No liberal person thinks that consolidation of power is a solution. In fact, most of us liberals want to diffuse that power to democratic vote as much as possible.

A doi.
 
2014-02-17 02:03:06 PM
I am ditching Time Warner as we speak, so I am getting a kick...

/ever since Time Warner bought out Insight, I'd rather have been kicked in the nads than call their "customer service."
 
2014-02-17 02:05:10 PM

BigBooper: mongbiohazard: I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you. Because this is so different from how our government is usually run. It's not like the people who we elect ostensibly as lawmakers actually spend more than half their time fundraising, so are more accurately described as fundraisers. Noooooooo...

/puke

Unless you start off very wealthy, and just buy a seat.
Of course most of the super wealthy are more inclined to buy a Senate seat.

/It's our version of the House of Lords


Except where is our House of Commons?
 
2014-02-17 02:05:19 PM

notto: Methodology: MapLight analysis of campaign contributions to members of Congress from PACs and employees of Comcast Corp., from January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012.

Comcast has 130,000 employees.

This methodology is BS.


Unless the contributions were bundled, a well-known campaign finance tactic. I forget...do cable and broadband companies ever offer bundles?
 
2014-02-17 02:05:51 PM

Dr Dreidel: They didn't stop the #1 and #2 airlines from merging (American/USAir), they didn't stop the top cable provider from merging with the top content distributor (NBCU/Comcast), they didn't stop the biggest online provider from merging with the biggest producer (AOLTimeWarner).

What makes anyone think there is any such thing as antitrust or anti-monopoly law anymore? All the companies have to do is show, on paper, that consumers might possibly win some small victory in some small area; while sweeping under the rug things like "choice", "competition", "fair markets" and any notion that monopolies are bad for business - and forcing regulators to ignore the common sense that combining, say, Comcast and Time Warner will lead to even less consumer choice (as if there is choice in ISPs now - sure, maybe if you have your own house, and if the municipality hasn't yet sold you out to one of the Big Guys).


And who can forget how well breaking up monopolies works? They lose that power forever...sort of.  http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704471904576229250 860034510?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB 10001424052748704471904576229250860034510.html
 
2014-02-17 02:08:07 PM

Diogenes: And I just got my mom to get a bundle from Time Warner.

*sigh*


My parents are on TWC, The Worst Cable company on the planet. They can't manage to configure a DNS properly given several years and a copy Internet for Dummies. I've had to point their internet connection to external DNS on so many occasions I've lost count. I wrote a batch job to do it remotely because they are in Arizona and I live in CA.
 
2014-02-17 02:12:29 PM

Slypork: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405274870447190457622925 0 860034510?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB 10001424052748704471904576229250860034510.html


http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405274870447190457622925 0 860034510?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB 10001424052748704471904576229250860034510.html

For the Farkers who can't edit their links.
 
2014-02-17 02:13:09 PM
Just a reminder from 2011...
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/f-c-c-commissioner- to -join-comcast/

Four months after the Federal Communications Commission approved a hotly contested merger of Comcast and NBC Universal, one of the commissioners who voted for the deal said on Wednesday that she would soon join Comcast's Washington lobbying office.

(bold is mine)
 
2014-02-17 02:13:27 PM

jayphat: Slypork: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405274870447190457622925 0 860034510?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB 10001424052748704471904576229250860034510.html

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405274870447190457622925 0 860034510?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB 10001424052748704471904576229250860034510.html

For the Farkers who can't edit their links.


Fark won't link the WSJ because they put up paywalls for links. LOL.
 
2014-02-17 02:17:17 PM
Corporations are people too.  They need some way to donate to political candidates.

This is just like you checking the "Donate $1 to the Presidential campaign fund" box on your taxes.
 
2014-02-17 02:19:51 PM

JerkStore: This is what you farks wanted with your unlimited political donations and "corporations are people" bullshiat. Enjoy.


2.bp.blogspot.com
 
2014-02-17 02:20:31 PM
Clearly if we had more government, this would not happen.

Need to raise those taxes now.
 
2014-02-17 02:21:21 PM

Dimensio: AT&T UVerse suddenly seems like a viable option.


I have UVerse, I like it. Half price on the bundle I chose for two years, great picture and sound, good DVR, lots of sports channels, good deal.
Even without the discount I would pay 20% less than cable+phone+internet. Look into it.
 
2014-02-17 02:22:43 PM

Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.


You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.
 
2014-02-17 02:23:41 PM

AngryDragon: Corporations are people too.  They need some way to donate to political candidates.

This is just like you checking the "Donate $1 to the Presidential campaign fund" box on your taxes.


Ugh, I hate that damn box. I nearly clicked it this year.
 
2014-02-17 02:24:49 PM

AngryDragon: Corporations are people too.  They need some way to donate to political candidates.

This is just like you checking the "Donate $1,000,000 to the Presidential campaign fund" box on your taxes.


FTFY
 
2014-02-17 02:25:53 PM

happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.



calitreview.com
 
2014-02-17 02:29:16 PM

Nemo's Brother: Clearly if we had more government, this would not happen.

Need to raise those taxes now.


Um, yeah. If we had "more" government (read: "a government that could faithfully execute its duty to regulate commerce among the states, pursuant to laws like antitrust law rather than pursuant to whoever signs the checks"), mergers like this wouldn't be allowed to happen.

As it stands, it hasn't even happened yet, so all we have is a sense of foreboding.

// and the taxes "we"'d want raised are on Comcast and its highest earners anyway, and have nothing to do with a merger or not
// did we have "more" government in the early 20th Century when "trusts" were actually busted (once or twice)?
 
2014-02-17 02:29:44 PM
Does anybody know....Where does Comcast compete with Time Warner Cable?  I'm pretty sure there is no place that they compete, so exactly how would their merger impact competition?
 
2014-02-17 02:32:51 PM

jayphat: AngryDragon: Corporations are people too.  They need some way to donate to political candidates.

This is just like you checking the "Donate $1 to the Presidential campaign fund" box on your taxes.

Ugh, I hate that damn box. I nearly clicked it this year.


Oh come on.  You have an opportunity to fuel Lulz like when all those people fought over Perot's share (Reform Party) in the next election.  Buchanan, Maharaji Natural  Laws, etc, all fighting over that chump change.

Better than Bumfights!

Isn't that worth a checkmark that doesn't change your bottom line?
 
2014-02-17 02:33:12 PM

tlars699: MyRandomName: And yet the liberal  Democratic/Republican solution is a further consolidation of power to the federal government.

FTFY

No liberal person thinks that consolidation of power is a solution. In fact, most of us liberals want to diffuse that power to democratic vote as much as possible.

A doi.


And yet, all your leaders are doing the opposite. King Obama!
 
2014-02-17 02:33:26 PM

The Southern Dandy: Does anybody know....Where does Comcast compete with Time Warner Cable?  I'm pretty sure there is no place that they compete, so exactly how would their merger impact competition?


It wouldn't, they currently don't compete. But what it does do is give the resulting company a crap ton of market share, power that can be used to bully some of the corporations. See what happened with CBS and Time Warner just last year.
 
2014-02-17 02:35:44 PM
I expect Comcast to get a $8,540,000 rate increase in the very near future.
 
2014-02-17 02:36:16 PM

Thunderpipes: tlars699: MyRandomName: And yet the liberal  Democratic/Republican solution is a further consolidation of power to the federal government.

FTFY

No liberal person thinks that consolidation of power is a solution. In fact, most of us liberals want to diffuse that power to democratic vote as much as possible.

A doi.

And yet, all your leaders are doing the opposite. King Obama!


Who said they were my leaders? I didn't vote them into office. And liberal=/=democrat.
How many times do I have to explain this to you thunDERPipes?
 
2014-02-17 02:36:39 PM

The Southern Dandy: Does anybody know....Where does Comcast compete with Time Warner Cable?  I'm pretty sure there is no place that they compete


Which in an of itself is a pretty strong argument for collusion and anti-trust.
 
2014-02-17 02:36:51 PM
Less cable tv providers and Net Nuetrality losing ground.

I see where this is going.
 
2014-02-17 02:40:51 PM
I'm hoping Brighthouse goes indie when TWC vanishes.  Sure they share that Roadrunner stuff.

But when TWC dumped supporting a Usenet server, BHN went out and contracted for one.

So I guess there's a faint hope.

/Using Earthlink via BHN cable at the moment.
//hoping I don't have to go ADSL
 
2014-02-17 02:45:46 PM
Ugh, on a related note - Charter just told me their "vendor" deleted a ton of people's voicemail greetings this week, but it's not considered an outage (even though I cannot re-record a greeting). No ETA to fix, and they can't notify me when it is fixed because their system has no way to notify customers about issues/restoration of service unless it's a service outage (voicemail is considered a feature outage).

Awful. Gotta love the old "blame the vendor" line too
 
2014-02-17 02:50:40 PM

HighlanderRPI: Ugh, on a related note - Charter just told me their "vendor" deleted a ton of people's voicemail greetings this week, but it's not considered an outage (even though I cannot re-record a greeting). No ETA to fix, and they can't notify me when it is fixed because their system has no way to notify customers about issues/restoration of service unless it's a service outage (voicemail is considered a feature outage).

Awful. Gotta love the old "blame the vendor" line too


If there was an area of the US law I want to see tightened, its the liability of corporations in regards to vendors and contract agents.  Stayed at a hotel(pretty sure it was Marriot) and friends car got a ding from the valet. When he talked to the hotel, they told him "it's not our responsibility, they are a contract service." Here is the problem I have. All the paperwork for valet check-in says Marriot all over it, on top of that they are wearing FARKING MARRIOT UNIFORMS.
 
2014-02-17 02:57:28 PM

notto: Methodology: MapLight analysis of campaign contributions to members of Congress from PACs and employees of Comcast Corp., from January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012.

Comcast has 130,000 employees.

This methodology is BS.


Oh, Sure.

I agree with you that this is obviously the result of a Rogue Employee with an agenda to embarrass the company, and all Comcast and Time Warner stockholders.

www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com
 
2014-02-17 02:58:53 PM
Lobbying equals government-sanctioned corruption.

/it really  is that simple
//the US government is rife with corruption, has lain in bed with big business for decades, and no longer even makes a pretense of having any interest in what is right for small business or the common man.
 
2014-02-17 02:59:41 PM
They told me if I voted for Romney, the country would be consumed by runaway crony capitalism. I voted for Romney and sure enough, the country is being consumed by runaway crony capitalism.

:(
 
2014-02-17 03:01:30 PM

happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.


Yea, like not regulating the banking industry has done such good for the public, and the economy.
 
2014-02-17 03:02:07 PM

gweilo8888: Lobbying equals government-sanctioned corruption.

/it really  is that simple
//the US government is rife with corruption, has lain in bed with big business for decades, and no longer even makes a pretense of having any interest in what is right for small business or the common man.


And the American people have decided they don't care, as long as we keep getting our cheap crap from overseas and as long as we continue to be politics entertained on the TV between reality shows.
 
2014-02-17 03:02:50 PM

jayphat: HighlanderRPI: Ugh, on a related note - Charter just told me their "vendor" deleted a ton of people's voicemail greetings this week, but it's not considered an outage (even though I cannot re-record a greeting). No ETA to fix, and they can't notify me when it is fixed because their system has no way to notify customers about issues/restoration of service unless it's a service outage (voicemail is considered a feature outage).

Awful. Gotta love the old "blame the vendor" line too

If there was an area of the US law I want to see tightened, its the liability of corporations in regards to vendors and contract agents.  Stayed at a hotel(pretty sure it was Marriot) and friends car got a ding from the valet. When he talked to the hotel, they told him "it's not our responsibility, they are a contract service." Here is the problem I have. All the paperwork for valet check-in says Marriot all over it, on top of that they are wearing FARKING MARRIOT UNIFORMS.


You could probably sue and win, but I agree with you that you shouldn't have to go through the trouble.  Its dishonest and shiatty
 
2014-02-17 03:04:28 PM

JungleBoogie: They told me if I voted for Romney, the country would be consumed by runaway crony capitalism. I voted for Romney and sure enough, the country is being consumed by runaway crony capitalism.

:(


It's such a contrast, since it never was consumed by runaway crony capitalism before.
 
2014-02-17 03:07:13 PM
They should all recuse themselves.
 
2014-02-17 03:16:32 PM

jayphat: HighlanderRPI: Ugh, on a related note - Charter just told me their "vendor" deleted a ton of people's voicemail greetings this week, but it's not considered an outage (even though I cannot re-record a greeting). No ETA to fix, and they can't notify me when it is fixed because their system has no way to notify customers about issues/restoration of service unless it's a service outage (voicemail is considered a feature outage).

Awful. Gotta love the old "blame the vendor" line too

If there was an area of the US law I want to see tightened, its the liability of corporations in regards to vendors and contract agents.  Stayed at a hotel(pretty sure it was Marriot) and friends car got a ding from the valet. When he talked to the hotel, they told him "it's not our responsibility, they are a contract service." Here is the problem I have. All the paperwork for valet check-in says Marriot all over it, on top of that they are wearing FARKING MARRIOT UNIFORMS.


It's like those dump trucks that haul rocks that have the sticker on the back "Not Liable For Falling Debris"... how legal is that anyway?  Can I just put a sticker on my car that says "Not Liable If I Run You Over"?
 
2014-02-17 03:19:13 PM
I use Comcast/XFinity for home ISP and cable TV, and have no serious gripes about the rates, or quality of service.  Although I do have an issue with the price including "Hillbilly Ghostbusters," whether or not I'll ever watch the show.

Cable TV channel selection options and rate adjustments is something Comcast will fight, to the bitter end.  (Which for me, would be as soon as I get around to synching up my laptop with my flat screen TV monitor.)
 
2014-02-17 03:29:08 PM

LordJiro: So, why don't Comcast and this committee get punished for giving/accepting bribes?

Oh, right. Laws are for little people.


Leona Helmsley, is that you?
 
2014-02-17 03:30:16 PM

Nemo's Brother: Clearly if we had more government, this would not happen.

Need to raise those taxes now.


You couldn't possibly BE more wrong. What we need is less government. If we didn't have things like pesky job-killing regulations, then the hard-working Job Creators wouldn't need to spend their hard-earned money to bribe the government into allowing them to screw their customers.
 
2014-02-17 03:38:20 PM

CheapEngineer: happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.

Yea, like not regulating the banking industry has done such good for the public, and the economy.


Many times does not equal all the time. And thank Clinton for the banking fiasco.,
 
2014-02-17 03:43:54 PM
After this merger, will Comcast be too big to fail?
 
2014-02-17 03:46:57 PM

CheapEngineer: notto: Methodology: MapLight analysis of campaign contributions to members of Congress from PACs and employees of Comcast Corp., from January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2012.

Comcast has 130,000 employees.

This methodology is BS.

Oh, Sure.

I agree with you that this is obviously the result of a Rogue Employee with an agenda to embarrass the company, and all Comcast and Time Warner stockholders.

[www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com image 300x225]


I had the same question, so I decided to go after the database. AAAAaaaand:

Data maintenance currently in process. Please check back soon.
http://maplight.org/data/get/federal-money-and-politics-dataset
 
2014-02-17 03:56:36 PM
stonicus:
It's like those dump trucks that haul rocks that have the sticker on the back "Not Liable For Falling Debris"... how legal is that anyway?  Can I just put a sticker on my car that says "Not Liable If I Run You Over"?

Actually, it's perfectly legal, as defined by insurance companies and backed up by state laws on insurance. Falling items / road debris etc is not a liability issue with the insurance policy - it falls under the damaged vehicle owner's comprehensive policy (if they have one). Similar to hitting a deer. I settled many claims as an adjuster where my company's insured party called us to get help going after the other party due to road debris, and even my own company wouldn't pursue it - they'd just pay out under the comprehensive coverage. Oh, you have liability only? Sucks to be you, you're paying it out of pocket.

Not saying I agree with it, just that's how it is unfortunately.

//one of the many reasons why I got out of the insurance business
 
2014-02-17 04:07:26 PM
It's Congress - nobody will be there to let the cable guy in. But they'll leave the cashbox - I mean, the door - unlocked.

/Sprint bought my ISP, Clear
// just got my rate increase notice, 10%
///Go figure, said the third slashie
 
2014-02-17 04:13:38 PM

techgeek07: iheartscotch: Is anyone really surprised? Frankly, I feel that politicians should be forced to wear patches of their corporate sponsors on their suits; kind of like nascar.

That's really odd.  I was thinking the same exact thing earlier today.  At least they could stop BS-ing about it.


Someone with passable photoshoppy skills and time to peruse the political donation sites could do this. I could find the time, but my shop skills got me laughed off of reddit. Couldn't go any lower.
 
2014-02-17 04:22:22 PM

felching pen: techgeek07: iheartscotch: Is anyone really surprised? Frankly, I feel that politicians should be forced to wear patches of their corporate sponsors on their suits; kind of like nascar.

That's really odd.  I was thinking the same exact thing earlier today.  At least they could stop BS-ing about it.

Someone with passable photoshoppy skills and time to peruse the political donation sites could do this. I could find the time, but my shop skills got me laughed off of reddit. Couldn't go any lower.


Been done a few times

images.dangerousminds.net

img.fark.net
 
2014-02-17 04:24:15 PM
images.sodahead.com
 
2014-02-17 04:41:06 PM

happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.

Yea, like not regulating the banking industry has done such good for the public, and the economy.

Many times does not equal all the time. And thank Clinton for the banking fiasco.,


So, in the intervening 8 years between Clinton leaving office and the collapse of the banking industry, the Bush administration was locked in a wardrobe, bound and gagged, with no way to warn anyone of the pending crisis?

I'm sure, inbetween war meetings, there must have been several administration banking regulators desperately trying to get Mr Bush to focus some attention to the disaster about to happen, but there were Democrats in the hallway tripping them and giving them wedgies.

s3.amazonaws.com

Yea, that's the ticket.
 
2014-02-17 05:24:11 PM

CheapEngineer: happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.

Yea, like not regulating the banking industry has done such good for the public, and the economy.

Many times does not equal all the time. And thank Clinton for the banking fiasco.,

So, in the intervening 8 years between Clinton leaving office and the collapse of the banking industry, the Bush administration was locked in a wardrobe, bound and gagged, with no way to warn anyone of the pending crisis?

I'm sure, inbetween war meetings, there must have been several administration banking regulators desperately trying to get Mr Bush to focus some attention to the disaster about to happen, but there were Democrats in the hallway tripping them and giving them wedgies.

[s3.amazonaws.com image 384x288]

Yea, that's the ticket.


Clinton signed off on the legislation, allowing Sandy Weill to put his plans into place. As soon as Clinton left office, Robert Rubin joined Citi and convinced Chuck Prince to invest in the fraudulent real estate loans. Learn some historical facts before showing your ass.
 
2014-02-17 05:56:12 PM

HenryFnord: The Southern Dandy: Does anybody know....Where does Comcast compete with Time Warner Cable?  I'm pretty sure there is no place that they compete

Which in an of itself is a pretty strong argument for collusion and anti-trust.


Well, we shouldn't let private companies run the highways.  Not even the information superhighways.  It's not good for business.
 
2014-02-17 06:01:25 PM

happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.

Yea, like not regulating the banking industry has done such good for the public, and the economy.

Many times does not equal all the time. And thank Clinton for the banking fiasco.,

So, in the intervening 8 years between Clinton leaving office and the collapse of the banking industry, the Bush administration was locked in a wardrobe, bound and gagged, with no way to warn anyone of the pending crisis?

I'm sure, inbetween war meetings, there must have been several administration banking regulators desperately trying to get Mr Bush to focus some attention to the disaster about to happen, but there were Democrats in the hallway tripping them and giving them wedgies.

[s3.amazonaws.com image 384x288]

Yea, that's the ticket.

Clinton signed off on the legislation, allowing Sandy Weill to put his plans into place. As soon as Clinton left office, Robert Rubin joined Citi and convinced Chuck Prince to invest in the fraudulent real estate loans. Learn some historical facts before showing your ass.


I wouldn't be too overconfident. You didn't actually address his point, merely deflected.
 
2014-02-17 06:12:39 PM

machodonkeywrestler: happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.

Yea, like not regulating the banking industry has done such good for the public, and the economy.

Many times does not equal all the time. And thank Clinton for the banking fiasco.,

So, in the intervening 8 years between Clinton leaving office and the collapse of the banking industry, the Bush administration was locked in a wardrobe, bound and gagged, with no way to warn anyone of the pending crisis?

I'm sure, inbetween war meetings, there must have been several administration banking regulators desperately trying to get Mr Bush to focus some attention to the disaster about to happen, but there were Democrats in the hallway tripping them and giving them wedgies.

[s3.amazonaws.com image 384x288]

Yea, that's the ticket.

Clinton signed off on the legislation, allowing Sandy Weill to put his plans into place. As soon as Clinton left office, Robert Rubin joined Citi and convinced Chuck Prince to invest in the fraudulent real estate loans. Learn some historical facts before showing your ass.

I wouldn't be too overconfident. You didn't actually address his point, merely deflected.


Since when is stating facts a deflection?
 
2014-02-17 06:35:46 PM

happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.

Yea, like not regulating the banking industry has done such good for the public, and the economy.

Many times does not equal all the time. And thank Clinton for the banking fiasco.,

So, in the intervening 8 years between Clinton leaving office and the collapse of the banking industry, the Bush administration was locked in a wardrobe, bound and gagged, with no way to warn anyone of the pending crisis?

I'm sure, inbetween war meetings, there must have been several administration banking regulators desperately trying to get Mr Bush to focus some attention to the disaster about to happen, but there were Democrats in the hallway tripping them and giving them wedgies.

[s3.amazonaws.com image 384x288]

Yea, that's the ticket.

Clinton signed off on the legislation, allowing Sandy Weill to put his plans into place. As soon as Clinton left office, Robert Rubin joined Citi and convinced Chuck Prince to invest in the fraudulent real estate loans. Learn some historical facts before showing your ass.


And no one in the Bush administration was able to fix this.

It was a horrible decision by Bill Clinton, but was written in stone and completely uncorrectable for 6+ years. All we could do was sit by, watch it happen, and shake our head at the tragedy that Bill Clinton wrought on the poor helpless Bush administration.

I'm not defending the Clinton administration, Asshole. I'm asking why, if it was such a stupid idea, did *no one* even try to put it back?

Unless the next administration was too busy generating a couple of wars to care, or thought that deregulating the banks, while done by that damn Democrat, was exactly what *they* would have done given the chance.

Because no deregulation is bad until it can be blamed on a Democrat, then it's *awful*.
 
2014-02-17 08:20:03 PM

CheapEngineer: happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: CheapEngineer: happydude45: Phil Moskowitz: rosebud_the_sled: And the conservative position is a to do nothing. Ever.

The conservative position is to make government as corrupt as possible, then biatch about government corruption.

You are confused. That is the Democrat way.

And Rosebud, many times doing nothing is preferable, and doing nothing is always preferable to doing damage. Ever worked for an absolutely incompetent boss? A rock sitting on the desk would do a better job of managing, just because it would do less damage.

Yea, like not regulating the banking industry has done such good for the public, and the economy.

Many times does not equal all the time. And thank Clinton for the banking fiasco.,

So, in the intervening 8 years between Clinton leaving office and the collapse of the banking industry, the Bush administration was locked in a wardrobe, bound and gagged, with no way to warn anyone of the pending crisis?

I'm sure, inbetween war meetings, there must have been several administration banking regulators desperately trying to get Mr Bush to focus some attention to the disaster about to happen, but there were Democrats in the hallway tripping them and giving them wedgies.

[s3.amazonaws.com image 384x288]

Yea, that's the ticket.

Clinton signed off on the legislation, allowing Sandy Weill to put his plans into place. As soon as Clinton left office, Robert Rubin joined Citi and convinced Chuck Prince to invest in the fraudulent real estate loans. Learn some historical facts before showing your ass.

And no one in the Bush administration was able to fix this.

It was a horrible decision by Bill Clinton, but was written in stone and completely uncorrectable for 6+ years. All we could do was sit by, watch it happen, and shake our head at the tragedy that Bill Clinton wrought on the poor helpless Bush administration.

I'm not defending the Clinton administration, Asshole. I'm asking why, if it was such a stupid ...


And I'm not defending the Bush administration on this either - they should have tried to fix it - no argument there whatsoever. The original sticking point in this back-and-forth though was the assertion that the conservatives were responsible for not regulating the banking industry.
 
2014-02-17 08:33:51 PM
And no one in the Bush administration was able to fix this.

It was being framed around here as discriminatory for loan practices not to have heavier involvement of "less fortunate" and "disadvantaged" people during the first Bush term.  No one was willing to challenge that mindset for fear of being labeled.  Some of those same folks were very quick to point to Dubya even when some of the actions were done at a state level.

Unfortunately the American people are tolerant of the increasing and increasingly bold corruption that goes on in DC.  For many trying to fight it sees ruined careers and a real "ploma o plata" type attitude.  The increasing trend towards a return of state-approved monopolies a la AT&T should be a red flag, but so long as we have our panem et circensens it is easier to rage on the internet than actually go out and do anything about it.

/the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street share more than meets the eye, people on both sides are tiring of the malfeasance and contempt some of our leaders have for us and our institutions
//Left and Right are increasingly different sides of the same table, the establishment Republicans would rather work with Dems than attempt real reform and the Dems actually interested in cleaning up will be hard-pressed to return if they try
///and it was potent enough even in the 1950s that Eisenhower warned about it in his farewell speech
 
2014-02-17 09:16:27 PM

The Southern Dandy: Does anybody know....Where does Comcast compete with Time Warner Cable?  I'm pretty sure there is no place that they compete, so exactly how would their merger impact competition?


It probably impacts content competition more than ISP areas.  They'd already prevented competing much there.  However, it leaves one company owning an even more tremendous slice of everything broadcast similar to the Comcast/NBC combo...
Time Warner Owns:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_Time_Warner
Comcast Owns:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_Comcast
NBC subsidiaries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBCUniversal#Subsidiaries

Right now you pretty much have Comcast, Fox, Disney, CBS, Viacom, Time Warner and Sony for most media.  Comcast acquired a controlling interest in NBC not that long ago, and made a failed bid for Disney in 2004.  This won't be it's last merger, and that pool is getting more and more concentrated.
 
2014-02-17 09:55:07 PM

happydude45: Since when is stating facts a deflection?


Look over there!  A squirrel!  Really!  It's a fact there is a squirrel!  Just stating that.
 
2014-02-17 10:26:32 PM

tlars699: MyRandomName: And yet the liberal  Democratic/Republican solution is a further consolidation of power to the federal government.

FTFY

No liberal person thinks that consolidation of power is a solution. In fact, most of us liberals want to diffuse that power to democratic vote as much as possible.


Unless you're using a definition of liberal that in modern times that is simply very uncommon, I don't see it. Sure if you're talking 18th century liberal, but not 21st. Liberal and conservative are in the mainstream today just different words for democrat and republican respectively. They both flip flop on issues depending on which party is pushing them at the moment.
 
2014-02-17 10:27:07 PM
and yet we can't all stop shooting at unarmed teenagers for FIVE MINUTES to put the bullets somewhere they'd do good and rid us of the likes of Comcast and AT&T...
 
2014-02-17 11:23:31 PM

HighlanderRPI: Ugh, on a related note - Charter just told me their "vendor" deleted a ton of people's voicemail greetings this week, but it's not considered an outage (even though I cannot re-record a greeting). No ETA to fix, and they can't notify me when it is fixed because their system has no way to notify customers about issues/restoration of service unless it's a service outage (voicemail is considered a feature outage).

Awful. Gotta love the old "blame the vendor" line too


You can contact the Executive office for Charter (most companies have an executive complaint line that escalates issues) or you can contact your state's Public Utilities Commission and file a complaint that way (those usually get escalated too).
 
2014-02-17 11:34:38 PM

Kit Fister: and yet we can't all stop shooting at unarmed teenagers for FIVE MINUTES to put the bullets somewhere they'd do good and rid us of the likes of Comcast and AT&T...


Who would you shoot?
 
2014-02-18 01:14:14 AM

Abox: Kit Fister: and yet we can't all stop shooting at unarmed teenagers for FIVE MINUTES to put the bullets somewhere they'd do good and rid us of the likes of Comcast and AT&T...

Who would you shoot?


I hear CEOs don't run very fast...
 
2014-02-18 09:37:04 AM

SashiRomanenko: stonicus:
It's like those dump trucks that haul rocks that have the sticker on the back "Not Liable For Falling Debris"... how legal is that anyway?  Can I just put a sticker on my car that says "Not Liable If I Run You Over"?

Actually, it's perfectly legal, as defined by insurance companies and backed up by state laws on insurance. Falling items / road debris etc is not a liability issue with the insurance policy - it falls under the damaged vehicle owner's comprehensive policy (if they have one). Similar to hitting a deer. I settled many claims as an adjuster where my company's insured party called us to get help going after the other party due to road debris, and even my own company wouldn't pursue it - they'd just pay out under the comprehensive coverage. Oh, you have liability only? Sucks to be you, you're paying it out of pocket.

Not saying I agree with it, just that's how it is unfortunately.

//one of the many reasons why I got out of the insurance business


There is a law in nearly every state with fines/liability for "Failing to Secure a Load".  If it results in an injury, the one who failed to secure the load would be liable in most states.

In some states this even applies to snow stuck on the car!
 
2014-02-18 07:07:43 PM

Kit Fister: Abox: Kit Fister: and yet we can't all stop shooting at unarmed teenagers for FIVE MINUTES to put the bullets somewhere they'd do good and rid us of the likes of Comcast and AT&T...

Who would you shoot?

I hear CEOs don't run very fast...


I don't think that would do it.
 
Displayed 121 of 121 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report