Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Raw Story)   George Zimmerman no longer has a home to overzealously defend   (rawstory.com ) divider line
    More: Cool, George Zimmerman, Ground warfare, homeless  
•       •       •

16290 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Feb 2014 at 5:52 PM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-02-15 05:56:19 PM  
8 votes:
That article reads like someone's tumblr blog. .
2014-02-15 06:02:13 PM  
7 votes:
Wow, did the author of that article actually watch the trial and the evidence presented?

It amazes me how many people have no idea what the actual facts of the case are, and instead rely on overtly emotional notions based on ignorant Facebook slacktivism.
2014-02-15 05:58:33 PM  
6 votes:
funny how media assassination and overzealous prosecution without a shred of evidence can destroy a person financially.

did I say funny? i meant tragic.
2014-02-15 06:49:29 PM  
5 votes:

doglover: hardinparamedic: [jokesound.files.wordpress.com image 500x333]
[i51.tinypic.com image 300x225]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 480x365]

[denver.mylittlefacewhen.com image 850x475]

[static.fjcdn.com image 493x429]

Couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole.

So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.

Meanwhile 10 innocent black teens were shot in Detroit this month and media can't even spare a second to remind us about the fact.


It's the police's job to investigate suspicious and potentially criminal activity.  It's the Neighborhood Watch's job to contact the police.  Once Zimmerman did his job, i.e. call the cops, he should have gotten the fark out of there and let the police do theirs.  Regardless of what Martin did or did not do, if Zimmerman had stuck with just "trying to do his job" none of us would have heard of either one of these people.
2014-02-15 06:12:25 PM  
5 votes:

GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?


Do people still believe that OJ Simpson killed people even though a criminal court didn't find him guilty?

/Wonder how much overlap there is between the OJ=Guilty and Zimmerman=Innocent crowds
2014-02-15 06:36:12 PM  
4 votes:
Electrify

He'll just continue to associate himself with rednecks and racists who see him as their idol.

Such a strange comment. A brown guy shot a black guy who was racist and homophobic, but he's an idol to racists? Which racists? Brown supremacists? Anti-black racists? Homosexual racists? The large segment of homosexual brown people that hate black people? Whuh?
2014-02-15 06:10:19 PM  
4 votes:

lunging_man_ass: Wow, did the author of that article actually watch the trial and the evidence presented?

It amazes me how many people have no idea what the actual facts of the case are, and instead rely on overtly emotional notions based on ignorant Facebook slacktivism.


Because members of the racebater brigade are morons. Martin fled and then came back and jumped Zimmerman. Martin initiated first physical contact. That's why Zimmerman's defense didn't involve Stand Your Ground at all - the case was easily made that it was straight self-defense. Further, the evidence("Creepy ass cracker!") shows that Martin's racism and prejudice against gays made him come back after he got home and jump Zimmerman in the first place.

But please, keep siding with Martin. It shows how little character is required of someone for you to hold them up as a martyr. No guilt like white guilt.
2014-02-15 06:04:18 PM  
4 votes:
I dont feel bad for Zimmerman, but that was a terrible article and subby should be ashamed.
2014-02-15 05:59:14 PM  
4 votes:
No, seriously. Guns are for pussies
2014-02-16 07:39:29 PM  
3 votes:

LoneWolf343: What you are saying only makes sense if you assume that Martin was under reasonable suspicion of a crime first. He was not. He was just a person in what Zimmerman deemed the wrong neighborhood. Scream and pound your fists all you like, but your reasoning is clear.


If Martin was guilty of anything it was probably his youth and inexperience in dealing with a gun toting power tripping asshole.
2014-02-16 09:50:54 AM  
3 votes:

fredklein: atomicmask: OH well that clears it up, I mean, being suspended for having a baggy with trace amounts of pot is not the same thing as having drugs..

Having an EMPTY baggie ONCE is not he same as "Was suspended 3 times for dealing drugs and doing them at school", which is what you claimed.


Because unless Treyvon's teenaged character isn't destroyed or defined as sufficiently thuggish and criminal then the championing of the shooter does not fit the narrative anymore.

I read somewhere where an MMA studio attempted to re-enact the whole incident based upon Mr Zimmerman's recorded interviews with police. And when it came to the actual "life threatening beating" Mr Zimmerman was experiencing, his initial claim that he had his gun holstered while Treyvon was straddling him and beating his head into the pavement kinda completely falls apart.

They found it impossible to pull the sidearm from its holster with even the smallest MMA student atop the largest MMA student.

Which suggests that Mr Zimmerman went for the weapon a whole heck of a lot sooner than testimony indicates

I'm certain that Treyvon was no saint, he was a fairly typical teenager that gets into the weed.

But I'm also fairly certain he wasn't the murderous gangster "thug" that the most vocal defenders of this shooting repeatedly depict.

Either way, if Mr Zimmerman had not been such a self motivated, over zealous wannabe cop on the unsanctioned neighborhood watch, the kid would still be alive. He was clearly told to stay in his vehicle. SO, I don't know what offends me more, Tbogg's schedenfreude? Or the way Mr Zimmerman's defenders repeated stretch truth and reality to defend the shooting.
2014-02-15 06:38:34 PM  
3 votes:
Wow, was I magically transported to Camelot overnight? Cuz there sure is a lot of White Knighting in this thread.
2014-02-15 06:35:35 PM  
3 votes:

leevis: The other half have been victims of black on black crime and think Trayvon had it coming.


Meaningless. Most victims are victimized by people of similar ethnic background in the U.S. That's because people tend to move around in a relatively small and relatively homogenous area when others like them live too.
2014-02-15 06:16:59 PM  
3 votes:
parasol:what matters is this  mr zimmerman appears to be unable to find a way to fade into the multitudes of americans coast to coast - this is, btw, something that ex-cons manage to do - that he wasn't convicted and still can't manage speaks more about the man than his actions that night.

I don't know about that myself. It seems the media is more obsessed with him out of white guilt and the fact that they can <i>make</i> a story out of him than anything else.

Look, I would call myself a liberal, but this is all insane if you ask me. People can't let go of the fact that someone can attempt to beat someone to death and it's legal to use deadly force to protect yourself. Everyone outside the case is injecting this insane racism into the case that I haven't ever been able to really see.

It seems that people expect racism, so it must be there.
2014-02-15 06:15:23 PM  
3 votes:
Remember guys, if you're getting the shiat beat out of you by a black kid, just let him do his thing. Eventually he'll get tired and when you're in the hospital getting treatment for your injuries, take comfort in the fact it was statistically unlikely to have happened to you.

Just make sure your nurse brings you plenty of charts and graphs that you can snuggle with, provided you're conscious and physically able to snuggle after the assault.
2014-02-15 06:14:55 PM  
3 votes:

Miss Alexandra: Tourney3p0: GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?

Regardless of what caused him to shoot, he did follow a kid around with a gun and eventually shot him.

Uh, no.

St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him) attacked Zimmerman.  He was knocking Zimmerman's head against the ground, and in case you didn't know, you can die of head injuries.  So in a sense St. Skittles was armed--with the pavement.

It was self-defense, plain and simple.

I might add that Skittles and watermelon juice (which is what he had, not iced tea) along with a third ingredient (I think it's cough syrup) are used to make a drug.  No, I haven't done it, but I read about it.

So St. Skittles wasn't the innocent little saint the media was portraying him as.


Interesting. I'm not sure I've seen this particular species of troll. Do go on....
2014-02-15 06:11:42 PM  
3 votes:

Tourney3p0: GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?

Regardless of what caused him to shoot, he did follow a kid around with a gun and eventually shot him.


Uh, no.

St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him) attacked Zimmerman.  He was knocking Zimmerman's head against the ground, and in case you didn't know, you can die of head injuries.  So in a sense St. Skittles was armed--with the pavement.

It was self-defense, plain and simple.

I might add that Skittles and watermelon juice (which is what he had, not iced tea) along with a third ingredient (I think it's cough syrup) are used to make a drug.  No, I haven't done it, but I read about it.

So St. Skittles wasn't the innocent little saint the media was portraying him as.
2014-02-15 06:02:58 PM  
3 votes:

Mattyb710: *click*

 George Zimmerman, who once shot a young man in Florida just to watch him die...

and close.


No kidding. Dude's a murderer, through and through, but that was one shiatty article.
2014-02-15 06:00:11 PM  
3 votes:
*click*

 George Zimmerman, who once shot a young man in Florida just to watch him die...

and close.
2014-02-15 05:58:56 PM  
3 votes:
jokesound.files.wordpress.com
i51.tinypic.com

bbsimg.ngfiles.com

denver.mylittlefacewhen.com

static.fjcdn.com

Couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole.
2014-02-15 05:58:28 PM  
3 votes:
Who wrote this crap article? Al Sharpton?
2014-02-15 05:54:37 PM  
3 votes:
Objectivity, how the Fark does it work?
2014-02-16 12:37:08 PM  
2 votes:
img.fark.net

Notice how the blood in the RH picture is all flowing towards the face. Kinda suggests an upright position at the time of injury and not, as he testified, flat on his back.

Trayvon may be no saint, but I'm damn certain Mr Zimmerman lied his ass off to avoid the consequences of his poor judgment.
2014-02-16 09:32:56 AM  
2 votes:

lordjupiter: Holy shiat look at all the Zimmer Rimmers.  Why don't you give him a home, he might cuddle with you.


Maybe, but looking at his arrest history, he's more likely to assault you or pull a gun on you, so buyer beware.

Let's face it - this is not some nice, innocent guy who found himself in a bad situation that he has deep, painful regrets about.  His 'PTSD" isn't because he shot and killed a teenager, it's because the big, bad media reported it and he had a high profile trial. (I will admit that MSNBC made far too much of a circus of the whole thing).  That said, I have to imagine most people in his scenario would feel horrible about what happened all told, wish they had taken some different steps that night, and go live a quiet life as far away from the spotlight as possible.  But he's not most people - he's not someone who makes wise decisions and he doesn't appear to be a good person.
2014-02-16 09:19:48 AM  
2 votes:
Holy shiat look at all the Zimmer Rimmers.  Why don't you give him a home, he might cuddle with you.

It's hilarious how these people need to paint a picture in their heads of an innocent guy who just happened to have a gun being jumped by a drugged out black "thug".  You're just projecting your own fears.  The facts of Zimmerman's pursuit and stalking behavior and subsequent violent and reckless activities are meaningless to you, but TM being a kid and acting like one is somehow proof he was a Superpredator luring Zimbo to an ambush.

Amazing level of self-bullshiatting.
2014-02-16 06:10:26 AM  
2 votes:

Miss Alexandra: St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him)


Maybe the retard brigade called him that, but rational, sane people didn't.

//I know which group I'm favouriting you as.
2014-02-16 03:12:37 AM  
2 votes:

People_are_Idiots: One must admit too that Tray-Tray made a couple of mistakes. First, he shouldn't look like someone who is going to rob a store (ie leave off the hood). Secondly, when you realize you're being followed, turn and confront the follower nicely (a simple "Hey how ya doin'?" and a smile works for me). Thirdly, do NOT try to invoke someone's anger, especially in a state with concealed carry.


1. it was raining. I find it funny you would think that wearing a hood in the rain would be justification for profiling

2. he tried to approach him while he was in the vehicle and George rolled up his window and wouldn't talk to him. The he followed him in his vehicle and when he couldn't anymore he got out and did it on foot.  I find it funny you put the burden to "defuse the situation" on the kid on the phone to his girlfriend walking home in the rain and not the stalker with a gun following him home.
2014-02-16 01:39:17 AM  
2 votes:
George Zimmerman, who once shot a young man in Florida just to watch him die, wants you to know that things have not gone so well for him since he got away with stalking and murdering a teenager for being black.

0-media-cdn.foolz.us
2014-02-16 12:53:06 AM  
2 votes:

Mr.BobDobalita: I always get a kick out of the people that say "well GZ shouldn't have been there.... Neither should TM. There was 3-4 minutes from when GZ lost sight of him and when the attack happened. He was 300' from his house. He could have been there in 20 seconds. He didn't go home.... why not? TM should not have been there... and if he just went home he would be alive.


He was probably hiding. When talking to 911, Zimmerman didn't want to say out loud what his address was, for fear that Trayvon might hear. (Which goes to show he already considered Trayvon to be a criminal, BTW). Is it that unbelievable that Trayvon didn't want to walk directly home, thus showing the "creepy" armed guy following him right where he lived? It's more likely he simply hid. And Zimmerman, even after acknowledging to 911 that he didn't 'need' to find Trayvon, kept looking until he found him. Trayvon, having his hiding place discovered by the armed nutter following him, feared for his life... and we know the rest.

Call it 'unproven'. Call it 'unsubstantiated'. Call it 'fantasy'. But it still fits the evidence, and explains several things that other theories don't.
2014-02-16 12:43:50 AM  
2 votes:

atomicmask: vygramul: Nutsac_Jim: mrshowrules: and if you have to shoot a kid to avoid a beating you asked for, you are a coward who deserves to go to jail

Walking down the sidewalk is a crime with a punishment of beating?   Which ghetto?

Facts not in evidence. We only have Zimmerman's word that Martin started the fight.

That and the witnesses...

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-beaten-prosecution-witness es /story?id=19517236

But I mean keep denying facts and making up the "sweet black baby" story you keep grasping at.


Um, Nope. Read the very first paragraph in the linked article:

"Two witnesses called by the prosecution today described George Zimmerman as being on the losing end of a fight with Trayvon Martin in the moments before Zimmerman shot the Florida teenager. "

There is nothing there about who STARTED the fight, just who was losing it later. For all we know, Zimmerman could have jumped Trayvon. Or Trayvon could have jumped Zimmerman. We don't know for sure.

But... we can make an educated guess by looking at their behaviors before the confrontation. Let's call them "A" and "B".

A was suspicious of B for no reason other than B was "just walking around, looking about." I mean, how DARE a black kid be in themy neighborhood. Walking and looking around! Isn't it the law that blacks are to stare at their feet as they walk?

A made the comment that "These assholes they always get away", in reference to B. So, he already lumped B in with criminals who 'get away', which shows he was already biased against B, for no reason except he was black.

A decides to get out of his vehicle and continue to follow B, despite being told this was not necessary. Thus proving he wanted to confront B- He didn't "need" to follow him, he wanted to follow him!

A continues to hunt for B for several minutes, instead of returning to his vehicle.

A was armed.

On the other hand...

B was minding his own business, just trying to get home, when he was followed by A.

B tried to get away from A, leaving the road and going behind the buildings. Only to have A follow him on foot.

B expressed that A was "creepy" -"causing an unpleasant feeling of fear or unease." He was AFRAID of A.

B was unarmed.

Now, looking at that, who is the most likely to start a confrontation- the biased, armed guy wanting to find and confront the other, or the fearful guy trying to get away?
2014-02-15 11:04:31 PM  
2 votes:

Olo Manolo: Harbinger of the Doomed Rat: Olo Manolo: Lesson learned.

If you are black, unarmed and somebody that you think is white looks at you for too long follows you around at night without saying anything to you, you should bash their head into the ground, there will be a large group of people that support your decision.

If you see somebody you don't recognize and call the cops to try to keep bad things from happening and then follow them instead of letting the police do their job then get your head bashed in some bruising a small scrape on your forehead then defend yourself with deadly force, be prepared to burn in hell.

Fixed to more accurately represent Zimmerman's own sworn testimony and the physical evidence.

Seriously people, even if every single word of Zimmerman's testimony is the absolute 100% unvarnished truth, Martin died because Zimmerman followed an unarmed teenager at night instead of letting the police do their f*cking jobs.

[www.martinfrost.ws image 474x224]
That's an odd place to put a forehead, right on the back of his head...

How do you ignore the part where the martin walked away, he WENT ELSEWHERE UNHARMED, aka situation over. Then RETURNED to pummel Zimmerman... If you get away from a situation safely, no harm done, then return to the situation aggressively, that is not self defense. That is looking for trouble. But go ahead, tell me more about the perfect little angel who was known for his kindness and compassion that was tracked down for several blocks by a rabid racist and shot in the back for fun...


Let's just ignore that he started it.

/Then pulled out a gun when he was loosing
//You're defending a coward and a bully. DIAF
2014-02-15 09:50:12 PM  
2 votes:

Olo Manolo: Harbinger of the Doomed Rat: Olo Manolo: Lesson learned.

If you are black, unarmed and somebody that you think is white looks at you for too long follows you around at night without saying anything to you, you should bash their head into the ground, there will be a large group of people that support your decision.

If you see somebody you don't recognize and call the cops to try to keep bad things from happening and then follow them instead of letting the police do their job then get your head bashed in some bruising a small scrape on your forehead then defend yourself with deadly force, be prepared to burn in hell.

Fixed to more accurately represent Zimmerman's own sworn testimony and the physical evidence.

Seriously people, even if every single word of Zimmerman's testimony is the absolute 100% unvarnished truth, Martin died because Zimmerman followed an unarmed teenager at night instead of letting the police do their f*cking jobs.

[www.martinfrost.ws image 474x224]
That's an odd place to put a forehead, right on the back of his head...

How do you ignore the part where the martin walked away, he WENT ELSEWHERE UNHARMED, aka situation over. Then RETURNED to pummel Zimmerman... If you get away from a situation safely, no harm done, then return to the situation aggressively, that is not self defense. That is looking for trouble. But go ahead, tell me more about the perfect little angel who was known for his kindness and compassion that was tracked down for several blocks by a rabid racist and shot in the back for fun...


and if you have to shoot a kid to avoid a beating you asked for, you are a coward who deserves to go to jail
2014-02-15 09:05:25 PM  
2 votes:
the real tragedy of all of this is if Zimmerman had listened to the police dispatcher and not followed the kid no one need have died that night.
2014-02-15 08:57:55 PM  
2 votes:

gnosis301: Mattyb710: *click*

 George Zimmerman, who once shot a young man in Florida just to watch him die...

and close.

No kidding. Dude's a murderer, through and through, but that was one shiatty article.


It's more like Trayvon Martin got shot trying to rob and stomp a white man.
2014-02-15 08:36:21 PM  
2 votes:
George Zimmerman, who once shot a young man in Florida just to watch him die...

farm4.staticflickr.com

/and anything else by RAWSTORY
2014-02-15 08:30:56 PM  
2 votes:
Stopped reading after the first sentence.  What incredible, unprofessional crap.
2014-02-15 08:27:04 PM  
2 votes:

stoli n coke: It's still funny that Zim-Zim's defenders still play the "he was being slammed mercilessly into the pavement" angle, implying that he's such a weakling that he was getting dominated by someone he had 80 pounds on, yet now, Zimmerman thinks he's a boxer.


Those 80 pnds were around the middle.  Dude is pear shaped.  Trayvon was high(inducing paranoia) had a history of beating up people that pissed him off(like his former principal), and was probably a burglar(only way he could have paid for those gold teeth they didn't show on the tv news.  This was exactly the wrong set of traits to mix with an out of shape wannabe Dirty Harry.  Trayvon was well on his way to becoming a revolving door inmate in the Florida corrections system while Zimmerman was well on his way to continuing to be a pear shaped loser.

And everybody just loses their minds whenever these two are brought up.
2014-02-15 08:15:58 PM  
2 votes:
Lesson learned.

If you are black, and somebody that you think is white looks at you for too long, you should bash their head into the ground, there will be a large group of people that support your decision.

If you see somebody you don't recognize and call the cops to try to keep bad things from happening then get your head bashed in then defend yourself, be prepared to burn in hell.
2014-02-15 08:01:25 PM  
2 votes:
What I've learned in this thread: It's OK if a wife beater shoots and kills an unarmed kid because skinny teenagers with Skittles are probably making purple drank.
2014-02-15 07:32:48 PM  
2 votes:

The My Little Pony Killer: parasol: Miss Alexandra: Tourney3p0: GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?

Regardless of what caused him to shoot, he did follow a kid around with a gun and eventually shot him.

Uh, no.

St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him) attacked Zimmerman.  He was knocking Zimmerman's head against the ground, and in case you didn't know, you can die of head injuries.  So in a sense St. Skittles was armed--with the pavement.

It was self-defense, plain and simple.

I might add that Skittles and watermelon juice (which is what he had, not iced tea) along with a third ingredient (I think it's cough syrup) are used to make a drug.  No, I haven't done it, but I read about it.

So St. Skittles wasn't the innocent little saint the media was portraying him as.

please tell me this is a parody fark account

I like how he even gives himself a female moniker, because nobody would fight with a "lady" on the interwebs amirite?


I think maggie, myself, and a few others would disagree with that. :P
2014-02-15 07:04:32 PM  
2 votes:

Miss Alexandra: St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him) attacked Zimmerman.


It was never proven who attacked first.

But, if you look at how the people involved were acting just prior to the incident, you can make a pretty good guess. One was running away, trying to avoid conflict. The other one was chasing. Gee, I wonder which was the aggressor.

He was knocking Zimmerman's head against the ground, and in case you didn't know, you can die of head injuries.

So, how, exactly, would you suggest an unarmed kid defend himself against a guy armed with a gun?

If you think about it, there are only two options (well, three. If you can out-run a bullet, you can try running away). 1) you can take the gun away- which is what Zimmerman says Trayvon tried to do- or 2) you can knock them out so they can't shoot you- say by hitting their head on the ground, which Trayvon also tried.

It was self-defense, plain and simple.

Exactly- Trayvon was trying to defend himself from a "creepy" armed guy who had been following him around.
2014-02-15 07:04:06 PM  
2 votes:

the8re: Objectivity, how the Fark does it work?


He left his home, armed, chased down, shot and killed a young man who had done nothing more than walk through his yard.

Fark objectivity. He's human garbage.
2014-02-15 06:56:14 PM  
2 votes:

Weatherkiss: Not everybody is the Lone Ranger. Guns typically aren't used to shoot other guns out of the hands of people. They're used to decide fights.


No. They're used to protect the lives of others who cannot be protected in any other way.

Do you know what that means? That means, unless you have no other way of doing so, you avoid the fight in the first place.

There's a reason that MOST states won't extend civil protections towards someone who ends up having to shoot the other party - even in self defense - in a fight they started or escalated in the first place.

This whole debacle could have been avoided by him doing what any other person would have done. Not get out of his car and follow someone he thought was a threat to the neighborhood to begin with alone.

THAT is why I don't feel sorry for him. This was not a rape victim shooting her attacker. This was not someone who's awoken in the house in the middle of the night and has to shoot someone to defend his family. Not someone who was carjacked. Not someone who had no other choice in the matter.

Again. He's like the guy who got lung cancer after smoking for 60 years. Tragic, but WTF did you EXPECT to happen?
2014-02-15 06:54:41 PM  
2 votes:

The_Original_Roxtar: parasol: The_Original_Roxtar: funny how media assassination and overzealous prosecution without a shred of evidence can destroy a person financially.

did I say funny? i meant tragic.

it is also funny - i mean tragic - how a person's destruction by the media can begin with a simple and shocking error in judgement on their part

please, don't use the word "assassination" in conjunction with Zimmerman - he is not in a position to warrant the phrase, nor is he dead

he could have moved to bumfark wyoming and gotten a job - and privacy - others have done so

you're right... zimmy should have let skittles cave his skull in.


Or he could have stayed in his damn truck.
2014-02-15 06:48:10 PM  
2 votes:

doglover: Clearly the boy did something wrong. Zimmerman's life was ruined already, but it was a legal shooting.


Don't care. He's in this situation because of his own doing. He's like the guy who smoked for sixty years and is surprised he has lung cancer.

Yes. It was a legal shooting. Yes, it was self defense at the point he shot him. We get that.

I don't feel sorry for him. He's an idiot.
2014-02-15 06:42:44 PM  
2 votes:

AngryDragon: doglover: hardinparamedic: [jokesound.files.wordpress.com image 500x333]
[i51.tinypic.com image 300x225]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 480x365]

[denver.mylittlefacewhen.com image 850x475]

[static.fjcdn.com image 493x429]

Couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole.

So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.

Meanwhile 10 innocent black teens were shot in Detroit this month and media can't even spare a second to remind us about the fact.

10?  You're off by a factor of ten


Zimmerman was raked over the coals multiple times by a legal system that's set up to be EXTREMELY unfair to people accused of a crime.

I should know. I've been arrested and detained for more than three months on zero evidence, zero witnesses, and no clear explanation of what I was alleged to have done. In other words, in America if you follow the rules and don't do anything THEY CAN STILL ARREST YOU FOR OVER 100 DAYS! That is the system you live in. America's laws are EVIL and it's horribly difficult to actually defend yourself against charges.

Now, Zimmerman was found next to a dead body holding the gun that shot the boy and told the police he did it ON CAMERA. Remember, this is the system were you can be arrested for doing nothing, held for 100 days in the hopes you do something, then released without even seeing a judge because if you get a trial you can counter-sue for wrongful arrest. The system where being a poor black man in Texas can land you on DEATH ROW. Zimmerman shot a 17 year old boy to death and admitted it on camera. Special federal prosecutors came out of their castles of bones to be his undoing with all the unfair legal powers that would entail encouraged by a public made frothy with falsified evidence from the incident. And they STILL couldn't make a murder charge stick.

Moral of the story: Whatever happened that night, the end result was that not even federal prosecutes with more than a year to prepare a case couldn't convince six women that a portly man was the bad guy. Clearly the boy did something wrong. Zimmerman's life was ruined already, but it was a legal shooting. It's time for the media to move on to actual news.
2014-02-15 06:41:02 PM  
2 votes:

Vitamin Pb: leevis: GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?

From my own observations, about 75% of the black population. The other half have been victims of black on black crime and think Trayvon had it coming.

Also, about 100% of the liberal population things this is what happened.


Considering Zimmerman himself stated under oath that he followed Trayvon and ended up shooting him, how else would you describe it?  He didn't have to follow the kid, but he chose to do so, thus "hunt", and since Zimmerman is not law enforcement, any action taken against Trayvon was vigilantism.  Since he did in fact kill Trayvon, it would be accurate to describe it as a "vigilante hunt & kill."  If you or Zimmerman have an issue with that description, too f*cking bad.  A whole lot of people have an issue with Zimmerman not letting the police do their job.
2014-02-15 06:37:34 PM  
2 votes:

Frank N Stein: Electrify: Maybe he will have an epiphany and will realize he was wrong in the way he handled and finished the situation, become a spokesperson for rational gun control, start a charity for those who are victims of needless gun violence (including Martin's parents), and become a hero of the left.

Nah. He'll just continue to associate himself with rednecks and racists who see him as their idol.

How many Che shirts do you own?


Che probably would have shot Trayvon too, he hated blacks.
2014-02-15 06:30:14 PM  
2 votes:

Miss Alexandra: Tourney3p0: GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?

Regardless of what caused him to shoot, he did follow a kid around with a gun and eventually shot him.

Uh, no.

St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him) attacked Zimmerman.  He was knocking Zimmerman's head against the ground, and in case you didn't know, you can die of head injuries.  So in a sense St. Skittles was armed--with the pavement.

It was self-defense, plain and simple.

I might add that Skittles and watermelon juice (which is what he had, not iced tea) along with a third ingredient (I think it's cough syrup) are used to make a drug.  No, I haven't done it, but I read about it.

So St. Skittles wasn't the innocent little saint the media was portraying him as.


please tell me this is a parody fark account
2014-02-15 06:23:47 PM  
2 votes:
How much libel can TBogg cram into 1 article?
2014-02-15 06:23:12 PM  
2 votes:

duffblue: He was acquitted, not sure where Fark posters get their facts from. Lot of forensic investigators here apparently.


Same place they get the idea that a man driven from his home gets a Cool tag.
2014-02-15 06:16:55 PM  
2 votes:

hardinparamedic: [jokesound.files.wordpress.com image 500x333]
[i51.tinypic.com image 300x225]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 480x365]

[denver.mylittlefacewhen.com image 850x475]

[static.fjcdn.com image 493x429]

Couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole.


So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.

Meanwhile 10 innocent black teens were shot in Detroit this month and media can't even spare a second to remind us about the fact.
2014-02-15 06:16:12 PM  
2 votes:

parasol: lunging_man_ass: Wow, did the author of that article actually watch the trial and the evidence presented?

It amazes me how many people have no idea what the actual facts of the case are, and instead rely on overtly emotional notions based on ignorant Facebook slacktivism.

it amazes me that, post trial and jury dismissal that people are still trying the case.
it is over and no more arguments, pro or con, matter

what matters is this  mr zimmerman appears to be unable to find a way to fade into the multitudes of americans coast to coast - this is, btw, something that ex-cons manage to do - that he wasn't convicted and still can't manage speaks more about the man than his actions that night.


Most ex cons aren't famous and hated by a large percentage of the country
2014-02-15 06:13:35 PM  
2 votes:
Was that an article with information, or is Fark just greenlighting some bozo calling himself "TBogg" ranting about his ill-informed opinions about the whole Zimmerman/Martin incident?

No matter which "side" you are on, this is just a stupid article.
2014-02-15 06:08:31 PM  
2 votes:

parasol: The_Original_Roxtar: funny how media assassination and overzealous prosecution without a shred of evidence can destroy a person financially.

did I say funny? i meant tragic.

it is also funny - i mean tragic - how a person's destruction by the media can begin with a simple and shocking error in judgement on their part

please, don't use the word "assassination" in conjunction with Zimmerman - he is not in a position to warrant the phrase, nor is he dead

he could have moved to bumfark wyoming and gotten a job - and privacy - others have done so


I wonder if all the guy's AW'ing is because he's still scraping together $ to pay legal bills.
2014-02-15 06:07:15 PM  
2 votes:

GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?


Regardless of what caused him to shoot, he did follow a kid around with a gun and eventually shot him.
2014-02-15 06:06:43 PM  
2 votes:
I feel like going and finding an editor for RawStory, taking him and beating his head on the ground, then start pummeling him.

Because I know that there is no way in hell they would every try to stop me and it would be fun. Why? Because they are all a bunch of crackers.
2014-02-15 06:06:28 PM  
2 votes:

lunging_man_ass: Wow, did the author of that article actually watch the trial and the evidence presented?

It amazes me how many people have no idea don't care and are ignorant what the actual facts of the case are, and instead rely on overtly emotional notions based on ignorant Facebook slacktivism.


/FTFE
2014-02-15 06:05:45 PM  
2 votes:

The_Original_Roxtar: funny how media assassination and overzealous prosecution without a shred of evidence can destroy a person financially.

did I say funny? i meant tragic.


it is also funny - i mean tragic - how a person's destruction by the media can begin with a simple and shocking error in judgement on their part

please, don't use the word "assassination" in conjunction with Zimmerman - he is not in a position to warrant the phrase, nor is he dead

he could have moved to bumfark wyoming and gotten a job - and privacy - others have done so
2014-02-15 06:05:01 PM  
2 votes:
He was acquitted, not sure where Fark posters get their facts from. Lot of forensic investigators here apparently.
2014-02-15 06:04:34 PM  
2 votes:

BadReligion: Raging Whore Moans: No, seriously. Guns are for pussies

Well the, I won't show off my new one. Well, ok, I will. It is an extra for pussies Ruger Blackhawk .357 stainless.
[i74.photobucket.com image 752x800]


Please tell me you have leather chaps and a cowboy hat when you wear that, right?
2014-02-15 06:03:36 PM  
2 votes:

clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.


Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?
2014-02-15 05:08:17 PM  
2 votes:

clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.


doubtful. more likely he's blaming it on the bleeding heart libs.
2014-02-15 04:57:23 PM  
2 votes:
I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.
2014-02-15 04:35:20 PM  
2 votes:
The spin... IT. IS. TOOMUCH. SPIN.
2014-02-16 07:51:56 PM  
1 vote:

Nutsac_Jim: X-boxershorts: He was clearly told to stay in his vehicle. SO, I don't know what offends me more,

I'd say you should be angry at your momma for giving you so many short bus genes.
Only a retard would be making your statement at this point..


An ad hominem attack like this basically means you have lost the argument.
2014-02-16 07:26:56 PM  
1 vote:

gja: LoneWolf343: gja: LoneWolf343: gja: LoneWolf343: gja: LoneWolf343: This thread is certainly full of names I've never seen before, defending Zimmerman and pooping all over Rawstory.

I am NOT defending RS, but RS is a pocketful-of-assholes.
And Tom Boggioni is a bigger asshole than I can express.
His package of libel based schadenfreude and vitriol shows his true character.

Mr B's lack of tact notwithstanding, I'm more acutely aware of a bunch of troll alts screaming foul over what is at worst a bad joke. But, surprise surprise, people get "vitriolic" when someone kills an unarmed kid and gets away with it, and derive pleasure from what little vengeance they are allowed. Who'd have thunk it? If it wasn't for the criminal incompetence of the authorities in the matter, Zimmerman would have been forgotten by now.

You ASSUME the blog is a "bad joke". I do not think so. TBogg is a shiatbag who has also been caught nearing the outskirts of antisemitism.
Before I made any judgement I read a load of his stuff, and then drew conclusion. He is an asshole. Lack of tact does not approach his failings.

And as far as what happened in trial, we ALL need to just own that it was decided and nothing further can be said or done.
Zimm was never found innocent, BTW, they just failed to find him guilty of the charges as specified.

That says more about you than it does about TBogg.

Yes it does, that I judge a person on the merits of their actions. That you think otherwise lets us all know where you live at.

Unless they are black and wearing a hoodie. Then they are clearly up to no good.

LIAR! I never mentioned or alluded to Trayvon. Point out where I said he was up to no good. You can't.
So now you are trying a misdirect. You are a COWARD and an asshole for bringing racist crap into this.


What you are saying only makes sense if you assume that Martin was under reasonable suspicion of a crime first. He was not. He was just a person in what Zimmerman deemed the wrong neighborhood. Scream and pound your fists all you like, but your reasoning is clear.
2014-02-16 05:34:32 PM  
1 vote:

Nutsac_Jim: hardinparamedic: Nutsac_Jim: Martin chose not to take the easy way out.  That's why he is dead.


No. He's dead because he was confronted by a man who had no business doing so, and who escalated the situation by doing so to a point where he "had" to use lethal force

Oh I see.  You were there.  Why did you not volunteer your services to the prosecution?

Oh, you mean you just pulled "he was confronted by a man" out of your ass?   Fair enough.


Keep smoking.  "He got out of is car, and I don't approve" is never going to be a legitimate argument.

Mounting a guy, on the other hand, is a bad move, and only three things can happen.
"It happens badly for you"
"It happens badly for the other guy"

Getting out of the car is irrelevant.  When they met up, one of them could have said "Excuse me kind sir, I have not seen you before in mine neighborhood, do you need assistance?"

I am going to go out on a limb and assume that neither one said that.

getting out of car = legal
following someone = legal
asking them questions = legal.
mounting them = not legal

Punch him in the face, knock him down, toss a good insult, run off, and live.


If someone got out of his car and followed me on a dark, deserted path he'd have about 2 seconds to make it very clear that his intentions were benign before he got a face full of pepper spray.    The idea that you are free to stalk someone is bullshiat.
2014-02-16 03:34:26 PM  
1 vote:

hardinparamedic: Nutsac_Jim: Martin chose not to take the easy way out.  That's why he is dead.


No. He's dead because he was confronted by a man who had no business doing so, and who escalated the situation by doing so to a point where he "had" to use lethal force


Oh I see.  You were there.  Why did you not volunteer your services to the prosecution?

Oh, you mean you just pulled "he was confronted by a man" out of your ass?   Fair enough.


Keep smoking.  "He got out of is car, and I don't approve" is never going to be a legitimate argument.

Mounting a guy, on the other hand, is a bad move, and only three things can happen.
"It happens badly for you"
"It happens badly for the other guy"

Getting out of the car is irrelevant.  When they met up, one of them could have said "Excuse me kind sir, I have not seen you before in mine neighborhood, do you need assistance?"

I am going to go out on a limb and assume that neither one said that.

getting out of car = legal
following someone = legal
asking them questions = legal.
mounting them = not legal

Punch him in the face, knock him down, toss a good insult, run off, and live.
2014-02-16 03:13:55 PM  
1 vote:

hardinparamedic: This whole debacle could have been avoided by him doing what any other person would have done. Not get out of his car and follow someone he thought was a threat to the neighborhood to begin with alone.


You are applying your own person view on society.  Shall we not generalize?

There are plenty of people who hear a scuffle and hide in their house, for fear it will somehow make its way into the residence.  Others, they will open the door and check out what is going on.

You are applying your own pussiness on the rest of the world.  There is nothing wrong with a guy that sees a something unusual, and calling the police, and when the threat moves, following to keep the police informed.

Nothing any more wrong than sitting in the car.
2014-02-16 09:26:20 AM  
1 vote:

atomicmask: OH well that clears it up, I mean, being suspended for having a baggy with trace amounts of pot is not the same thing as having drugs..


Having an EMPTY baggie ONCE is not he same as "Was suspended 3 times for dealing drugs and doing them at school", which is what you claimed.
2014-02-16 09:16:04 AM  
1 vote:

gja: LoneWolf343: This thread is certainly full of names I've never seen before, defending Zimmerman and pooping all over Rawstory.

I am NOT defending RS, but RS is a pocketful-of-assholes.
And Tom Boggioni is a bigger asshole than I can express.
His package of libel based schadenfreude and vitriol shows his true character.


Mr B's lack of tact notwithstanding, I'm more acutely aware of a bunch of troll alts screaming foul over what is at worst a bad joke. But, surprise surprise, people get "vitriolic" when someone kills an unarmed kid and gets away with it, and derive pleasure from what little vengeance they are allowed. Who'd have thunk it? If it wasn't for the criminal incompetence of the authorities in the matter, Zimmerman would have been forgotten by now.
2014-02-16 08:30:13 AM  
1 vote:

hardinparamedic: Miss Alexandra: Uh, no.

St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him) attacked Zimmerman.  He was knocking Zimmerman's head against the ground, and in case you didn't know, you can die of head injuries.  So in a sense St. Skittles was armed--with the pavement.

No, no one calls him that. Even people who legitimately believe that it was self-defense and that the entire situation was provoked by Martin don't call him that.

Maybe you're confusing us with your friends at Stormfront.

Miss Alexandra: I might add that Skittles and watermelon juice (which is what he had, not iced tea) along with a third ingredient (I think it's cough syrup) are used to make a drug.  No, I haven't done it, but I read about it.

So St. Skittles wasn't the innocent little saint the media was portraying him as.

You might add that, but you'd demonstrate you have shiat-all idea what you're talking about. "Grape Drank" is a grain alcohol, grape juice or kool-aid, and codeine cough syrup OR promethazine (phenergan)

It's not Arizona Iced Tea and skittles, you racist flat earther moron.


Read this lady's profile. She believes in farking geocentricism
2014-02-16 05:42:08 AM  
1 vote:
Okay, you're half black, great. That doesn't change my point in any way, so many pissed off white guys have been using racist language and your side is stuck with that label. By continuing to play into that racial bs your argument isn't clear. You're adding a barrier of racist shiat that is a big deal I a country like this that people don't even know whether or not what the Z Man did was justified. You're to busy confusing the issue by being racial when this should be about right and wrong in the terms of self defense. I'm trying to help you here.
2014-02-16 05:36:25 AM  
1 vote:

Olo Manolo: TheJoe03: All I'm saying is that you can defend Zimmerman without using obvious racial language, it makes your side and your point more kosher. If this really wasn't about race like your side claims, why use race in your initial arguments. Wait for the other side to bring in race and say race wasn't a part of it and here's why what Zimmerman did was just. It makes the argument clearer from your perspective and makes people on the fence not think you ARE actually a racist that rooted against the general black position based on your view on historic American race relations. I clearly separate posters like you from non racist people that think Zimmerman was acting in reasonable self defense.


And you can reserve use of the term "racist" for people that deserve it. Just because you feel something was meant in a derogatory manner, doesn't mean it inherently is so.. If you had been watching me say the same thing I just said, but on tv (where you would assume I was black based on my appearance, instead of assuming I was white based on my "racism") nothing I said would have triggered your "That's racist!" response. It's a ridiculous double standard, but that's clearly the way it works.


That's a serious dodge of what I said. If this wasn't about race why constantly use racial language? It makes your argument weak and makes you appear to be racists to other people.
2014-02-16 05:20:01 AM  
1 vote:
All I'm saying is that you can defend Zimmerman without using obvious racial language, it makes your side and your point more kosher. If this really wasn't about race like your side claims, why use race in your initial arguments. Wait for the other side to bring in race and say race wasn't a part of it and here's why what Zimmerman did was just. It makes the argument clearer from your perspective and makes people on the fence not think you ARE actually a racist that rooted against the general black position based on your view on historic American race relations. I clearly separate posters like you from non racist people that think Zimmerman was acting in reasonable self defense.
2014-02-16 05:10:11 AM  
1 vote:

Olo Manolo: TheJoe03:
Ya boy? In quotes for some reason? How obviously racist can you guys be? I do like how this whole issue made knowing who the dipshiat racists on this site easier.


Right. I'm a racist.

and you are a unicorn. So deal with it, dipshiat..


That's your response? Why did you say "ya boy"? You're making black jokes but in a serious manner. It's kinda racist, you can deny it all you want. As a fan of jokes and comedy I'd say it wouldn't be racist if your black joke actually had a punchline and wasn't trying to be part of your "argument".
2014-02-16 04:54:47 AM  
1 vote:

Olo Manolo: redheededstepchild: He followed a teenage boy home from the store. We used to warn kids about this kind of behavior. And since so many want to cast a dead guy as the 'villan' why not speculate on trey being the good guy.

So let me get this straight... Framing zimmerman as a pedophile and a racist automatically makes "ya boy trey" a good guy? Is that how this works?


Ya boy? In quotes for some reason? How obviously racist can you guys be? I do like how this whole issue made knowing who the dipshiat racists on this site easier.
2014-02-16 03:57:03 AM  
1 vote:

Hobodeluxe: People_are_Idiots: One must admit too that Tray-Tray made a couple of mistakes. First, he shouldn't look like someone who is going to rob a store (ie leave off the hood). Secondly, when you realize you're being followed, turn and confront the follower nicely (a simple "Hey how ya doin'?" and a smile works for me). Thirdly, do NOT try to invoke someone's anger, especially in a state with concealed carry.

1. it was raining. I find it funny you would think that wearing a hood in the rain would be justification for profiling

2. he tried to approach him while he was in the vehicle and George rolled up his window and wouldn't talk to him. The he followed him in his vehicle and when he couldn't anymore he got out and did it on foot.  I find it funny you put the burden to "defuse the situation" on the kid on the phone to his girlfriend walking home in the rain and not the stalker with a gun following him home.


1. Usually I never wear a hood when it rains. I carry an umbrella. I also typically don't WALK in the rain.

2. I usually pay a guy in the car no mind, until they -start- following. I -then- would confront "NICELY." Wanna know how he confronted him? Most likely (typically how I have heard other kids 15-18 confront) "Hey what's your problem man?" and getting ready to land blows.
2014-02-16 03:36:24 AM  
1 vote:

redheededstepchild: He followed a teenage boy home from the store. We used to warn kids about this kind of behavior. And since so many want to cast a dead guy as the 'villan' why not speculate on trey being the good guy.


So let me get this straight... Framing zimmerman as a pedophile and a racist automatically makes "ya boy trey" a good guy? Is that how this works?
2014-02-16 03:26:01 AM  
1 vote:

Olo Manolo: redheededstepchild:

And if some creep was walking around my neiborhood, staring at children when they were walking back and forth to the store, carrying a gun, i would think he was some kinda pervert. We know little to nothing about the days before the shooting. We know nothing about the neiborhood. Maybe he didn' ...

And there it goes... Not only is he a big ol' gun totin' racist, but he is also a pedophile. No evidence whatsoever required..

 "Hey, don't blame me, I'm just asking questions here. but you can't PROVE he's not a racist or a pedophile.."


Probably not a racist or a pedophile, murderer definitely.
2014-02-16 03:07:23 AM  
1 vote:

The_Original_Roxtar: funny how media assassination and overzealous prosecution without a shred of evidence can destroy a person financially.

did I say funny? i meant tragic.


send him more money then. he probably still has a website up accepting donations. it's obvious this is just an attempt by him to raise more cash.

------

funny how be pussied out on the fight. I thought he might. people like him can't function without their security blanket strapped on.
2014-02-16 02:35:07 AM  
1 vote:

Mattyb710: *click*

 George Zimmerman, who once shot a young man in Florida just to watch him die...

and close.


That's as far as I got as well.
2014-02-16 01:49:19 AM  
1 vote:

Fark It: George Zimmerman, who once shot a young man in Florida just to watch him die, wants you to know that things have not gone so well for him since he got away with stalking and murdering a teenager for being black.

[0-media-cdn.foolz.us image 350x227]


um, no one denies that's precisely what happened you know. They only bicker about how much justification he had in using lethal for.... ah, fark it.
2014-02-16 01:04:04 AM  
1 vote:

Nutsac_Jim: You mean walking down the path... while on the phone with the police?

Yes, he went to go hunt himself a kid while carrying an evidence producing phone. Every killer does that. It is Stalk101.


But he made sure to hang up with 911, AND not give them a location, before continuing to hunt Trayvon.

7:13:14pm: Zimmerman has lost Trayvon. He doesn't want to say his address out loud because "I don't know where this kid is." Nine seconds later, Zimmerman tells dispatcher to have police call him when they arrive rather than meet at specific place, indicating that Zimmerman plans to keep moving, and doesn't know where exactly he'll be when police arrive.

7:13:41pm: Zimmerman's phone call with dispatch ends.

7:14pm: There is approximately a one minute, thirty second period for which we have very little information about what occurred, from around 17:14:00 until 17:15:30. Zimmerman apparently keeps searching for Trayvon during this time period, and phone records show that Trayvon is still on the phone with DeeDee. Also during this period of time, neither party moves particularly far from their estimated locations at 7:13:00pm;


Hmm, almost like he planned it: He was on the phone with 911 at the beginning, then once he figured he scared Trayvon into hiding, he hung up and continued searching until he found, confronted, fought with, and shot Trayvon.
2014-02-16 12:57:44 AM  
1 vote:

Nutsac_Jim: TheJoe03: Nutsac_Jim: TheJoe03: Nutsac_Jim: TheJoe03: I don't like him cause he was such a wannabe cop that the kid died, it all seemed avoidable. Zimmerman wanted to serve vigilante justice and now people hate him. Boo hoo.

Indeed.

What would have happened if Martin just went in the house instead of going back to teach cracker-ass a lesson?  Zimmerman sniffs the footprints and enters the house and shoots everyone?

Calm down angry white guy.

Sorry mister racist.

How exactly am I racist? Are you projecting?

Look at that. you cuss so much around the kids you even deny you say it after the kid says 'daddy said fark' and your wife glares at you.


Uh, are you on acid or something? Zimmerman supporters are an interesting bunch. Bless your heart.
2014-02-16 12:56:06 AM  
1 vote:

Mr.BobDobalita: As I understand it, he was talking to a 911 operator. NOT a 911 dispatcher, and NOT the police.


"911" is generally considered to be "the police". You are nitpicking.
2014-02-16 12:34:58 AM  
1 vote:

Nutsac_Jim: vygramul: Nutsac_Jim: Zimmerman didn't intervene.  He stopped nothing.   He simply followed the young chap until the police told him not to do so.

You are inserting an awful lot of omniscience in there with your assertion that his behavior is caused by him having a gun.  Plenty of people do unrecommended/unwise things all the time.  He simply happened to be carrying.  This forethought likely saved him from further damage after someone tried to teach him a lesson.

You're right, he stopped nothing. Despite following Martin. His Neighborhood Watch training was explicit in deprecating leaving the car to see where Martin went. Had he not done so, no crime would have been committed, and no one would have gotten their ass kicked and no one would be dead.

So basically, if zimmerman didnt walk around in a shirt and fark me pumps, he wouldnt have been there to rape.  I think you are right.  Rape is a woman's fault.



If you're trying to use the analogy of Zimmerman as a rape victim, you may want to entertain the fact that most rape victims don't stop and stare at potential rapists and then start walking after them.
2014-02-16 12:34:02 AM  
1 vote:

Nutsac_Jim: LoneWolf343: Nutsac_Jim: mrshowrules: and if you have to shoot a kid to avoid a beating you asked for, you are a coward who deserves to go to jail

Walking down the sidewalk is a crime with a punishment of beating?   Which ghetto?

Walking down the sidewalk is a crime worth of stalking and confrontation?

While he was on the phone with the cops.

Most stalkers, when committing crimes, do not do it so police can conveniently record their behavior.

He might be an exceptional stalker, though.


I'll comment that zimmerman was told the police didnt need him to follow him and zimmerman said 'ok'

Martin, he went home and turned back to teach cracker ass a lesson.    So did Martin stalk zimmerman and confront him?


you guys and your 'stalk'....


"An exceptionally dumb one" is an assessment I doubt any reasonable person could argue with. Still, he got away with stalking, engaging, and killing an unarmed boy, so maybe he knows something that I wouldn't have in that situation, probably having something do with racial politics...
2014-02-16 12:23:26 AM  
1 vote:

fredklein: Nutsac_Jim: fredklein: No. "Zimmy" should have minded his own damn business and not followed Trayvon around the neighborhood.

Most criminal behavior is, indeed, foiled by someone not minding their own business.  Despite fantasy, it isnt by cops just happening to be driving by.....

So, um, exactly what crime was Trayvon committing? Walking While Black?


For some reason, we're allowed to speculate all kinds of nasty things about Martin because he is dead, and we're allowed to take Zimmerman at his word because he said so. The rational position is to admit not knowing who started the fight. But people aren't comfortable with that because it introduces doubt that would require ignoring substantial cognitive dissonance to continue to take sides.

And this isn't just the Zimmerman people.
2014-02-16 12:07:02 AM  
1 vote:

Olo Manolo: vygramul:

You're right, he stopped nothing. Despite following Martin. His Neighborhood Watch training was explicit in deprecating leaving the car to see where Martin went. Had he not done so, no crime would have been committed, and no one would have gotten their ass kicked and no one would be dead.

How can you say that with such confidence? You claim to know how the night would have played out minus the mart/zim interaction?  I am certainly jealous of your omniscience.


So Zimmerman was innocently walking down the street but Martin was guiltily walking down the street? It's ok to assume innocent intent on the part of Zimmerman but not Martin?

Who's the omniscient one who gets to differentiate between the two?
2014-02-15 11:48:30 PM  
1 vote:
Trolls within trolls within trolls.

This site and the troll trash it links to, and the trolls it encourages, is too much lately.

DIAF Drew. Your site sucks.
2014-02-15 11:45:19 PM  
1 vote:

vygramul: Nutsac_Jim: mrshowrules: and if you have to shoot a kid to avoid a beating you asked for, you are a coward who deserves to go to jail

Walking down the sidewalk is a crime with a punishment of beating?   Which ghetto?

Facts not in evidence. We only have Zimmerman's word that Martin started the fight.



Zimmerman asked for the beating, apparently, because he chose to walk down the sidewalk at an unapproved time.
2014-02-15 11:09:32 PM  
1 vote:

Nutsac_Jim: fredklein: No. "Zimmy" should have minded his own damn business and not followed Trayvon around the neighborhood.

Most criminal behavior is, indeed, foiled by someone not minding their own business.  Despite fantasy, it isnt by cops just happening to be driving by.....


Most criminal behavior is, in fact, stopped by someone calling the police, not someone intervening. If Zimmerman had called police and reported the suspicion and that was it, good on him. Following the kid was stupid and dangerous, as his Neighborhood Watch training indicated.

If he could take back that night, do you think he would? How has his life turned out? And THAT is why you have to be an imbecile to play supercop just because you have a gun on you.
2014-02-15 10:55:48 PM  
1 vote:

grimlock1972: the real tragedy of all of this is if Zimmerman had listened to the police dispatcher and not followed the kid no one need have died that night.


Tell you what.. when you bank a bridesmaid at a wedding, tell your wife that if the bridesmaid you banged just stayed with the rest of the wedding party, she never would have tripped and fallen on your dick, and see how far that gets you.
2014-02-15 10:27:06 PM  
1 vote:
www.bitlogic.com
2014-02-15 10:03:12 PM  
1 vote:

Harbinger of the Doomed Rat: lunging_man_ass: jayhawk88: the8re: Objectivity, how the Fark does it work?

He left his home, armed, chased down followed a suspicious person from a distance, called police, and after the suspicious person attacked him and began pounding Zimmerman's head on pavement, shot and killed a young man who had done nothing more than walk through his yard violently physically assault a man trying to keep the neighborhood safe.

Fark objectivity. He's I'm human garbage.

FTFY, looks like we have another Facebook slacktivist.

I notice that you left out the part where Zimmerman continued to follow the suspicious person after having called the police and was instructed by the dispatcher to not follow said suspicious person and then proceeded to ignore what he was told by the dispatcher.


Except for the part where dispatchers cannot legally instruct somebody to do anything...
"We don't need you to do that" is not instructions, which would be worded more like "Do not do that". It's the same thing a dispatcher would say in any situation in order to absolve themselves/the department of responsibility should somebody get hurt following their "directions".
2014-02-15 10:00:02 PM  
1 vote:

Olo Manolo: How do you ignore the part where the martin walked away, he WENT ELSEWHERE UNHARMED, aka situation over. Then RETURNED to pummel Zimmerman... If you get away from a situation safely, no harm done, then return to the situation aggressively, that is not self defense. That is looking for trouble. But go ahead, tell me more about the perfect little angel who was known for his kindness and compassion that was tracked down for several blocks by a rabid racist and shot in the back for fun...


How do you ignore the part where Zimmerman was told by the police to stop following Martin and he ignored them?  If the police tell you to stop following a suspicious individual, you don't then get to claim you're an innocent victim when you ignore them.

Also, thinking Zimmerman f*cked up and someone died as a direct result ≠ thinking Martin is an angel.  I'm sorry if your binary thinking can't grasp that concept, but it's entirely possible to think that both people involved in that altercation were less than stellar human beings.
2014-02-15 09:56:07 PM  
1 vote:

atomicmask: TheJoe03: atomicmask: Weatherkiss: atomicmask: duffblue: He was acquitted, not sure where Fark posters get their facts from. Lot of forensic investigators here apparently.


Don't you know, in liberal justice, if you harm a minority YOU ARE GUILTY. Doesn't matter if he proved his innocence and that it was rightful and self defense in a court of his peers, he harmed a black "teenager" so therefore the white guilt train should have carried him all the way to death row.

furthermore, if the court doesn't go your way, just attack him and ruin his life! Its the lib way!

I'm liberal and knew Zimmerman was getting acquitted. Outside of Fark CSI and Fark Lawyers who keep sticking to their guns for whatever reason, it seems there are quite a few liberals on Fark who see the incident for what it was and aren't trying to fabricate anything else other than easily avoidable altercation between 2 assholes.

Not all of us are bored enough to look for a social justice issue where none exists.

Oh god, you guys still exist? Here I was thinking that the rational liberal minded individual was a extinct thing, replaced by the "Die cis scum" social justice brigades that currently populate fark and the internet.

What does cis mean?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender 

Heteronormaitive. apparently the social justice brigades hate us cause we enjoy strait sex.


Ah, you mean "normal".
2014-02-15 09:55:04 PM  
1 vote:

lunging_man_ass: jayhawk88: the8re: Objectivity, how the Fark does it work?

He left his home, armed, chased down followed a suspicious person from a distance, called police, and after the suspicious person attacked him and began pounding Zimmerman's head on pavement, shot and killed a young man who had done nothing more than walk through his yard violently physically assault a man trying to keep the neighborhood safe.

Fark objectivity. He's I'm human garbage.

FTFY, looks like we have another Facebook slacktivist.


I notice that you left out the part where Zimmerman continued to follow the suspicious person after having called the police and was instructed by the dispatcher to not follow said suspicious person and then proceeded to ignore what he was told by the dispatcher.  I wonder why you would leave that part out?  Oh, that's right, because it would conflict with your "Zimmerman was an innocent hero" narrative.

It wouldn't have mattered if Martin had been the size of Terry Crews, had a gun in each hand, and was wearing a "Killing is my business and business is good" t-shirt, Zimmerman should have followed instructions and let the police do their jobs.  Vigilantism has no place outside of b-grade action flicks and NRA members' wet dreams.
2014-02-15 09:48:02 PM  
1 vote:

Harbinger of the Doomed Rat: Olo Manolo: Lesson learned.

If you are black, unarmed and somebody that you think is white looks at you for too long follows you around at night without saying anything to you, you should bash their head into the ground, there will be a large group of people that support your decision.

If you see somebody you don't recognize and call the cops to try to keep bad things from happening and then follow them instead of letting the police do their job then get your head bashed in some bruising a small scrape on your forehead then defend yourself with deadly force, be prepared to burn in hell.

Fixed to more accurately represent Zimmerman's own sworn testimony and the physical evidence.

Seriously people, even if every single word of Zimmerman's testimony is the absolute 100% unvarnished truth, Martin died because Zimmerman followed an unarmed teenager at night instead of letting the police do their f*cking jobs.


www.martinfrost.ws
That's an odd place to put a forehead, right on the back of his head...

How do you ignore the part where the martin walked away, he WENT ELSEWHERE UNHARMED, aka situation over. Then RETURNED to pummel Zimmerman... If you get away from a situation safely, no harm done, then return to the situation aggressively, that is not self defense. That is looking for trouble. But go ahead, tell me more about the perfect little angel who was known for his kindness and compassion that was tracked down for several blocks by a rabid racist and shot in the back for fun...
2014-02-15 09:45:20 PM  
1 vote:

atomicmask: TheJoe03: atomicmask: Weatherkiss: atomicmask: duffblue: He was acquitted, not sure where Fark posters get their facts from. Lot of forensic investigators here apparently.


Don't you know, in liberal justice, if you harm a minority YOU ARE GUILTY. Doesn't matter if he proved his innocence and that it was rightful and self defense in a court of his peers, he harmed a black "teenager" so therefore the white guilt train should have carried him all the way to death row.

furthermore, if the court doesn't go your way, just attack him and ruin his life! Its the lib way!

I'm liberal and knew Zimmerman was getting acquitted. Outside of Fark CSI and Fark Lawyers who keep sticking to their guns for whatever reason, it seems there are quite a few liberals on Fark who see the incident for what it was and aren't trying to fabricate anything else other than easily avoidable altercation between 2 assholes.

Not all of us are bored enough to look for a social justice issue where none exists.

Oh god, you guys still exist? Here I was thinking that the rational liberal minded individual was a extinct thing, replaced by the "Die cis scum" social justice brigades that currently populate fark and the internet.

What does cis mean?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender 

Heteronormaitive. apparently the social justice brigades hate us cause we enjoy strait sex.


Oh, that reminds of "mansplaining" and all the words feminists on the internet are making up. Seems goofy, I hope they realize they are making their side look silly.
2014-02-15 09:35:31 PM  
1 vote:

atomicmask: duffblue: He was acquitted, not sure where Fark posters get their facts from. Lot of forensic investigators here apparently.


Don't you know, in liberal justice, if you harm a minority YOU ARE GUILTY. Doesn't matter if he proved his innocence and that it was rightful and self defense in a court of his peers, he harmed a black "teenager" so therefore the white guilt train should have carried him all the way to death row.

furthermore, if the court doesn't go your way, just attack him and ruin his life! Its the lib way!


I'm liberal and knew Zimmerman was getting acquitted. Outside of Fark CSI and Fark Lawyers who keep sticking to their guns for whatever reason, it seems there are quite a few liberals on Fark who see the incident for what it was and aren't trying to fabricate anything else other than easily avoidable altercation between 2 assholes.

Not all of us are bored enough to look for a social justice issue where none exists.
2014-02-15 09:34:31 PM  
1 vote:

atomicmask: duffblue: He was acquitted, not sure where Fark posters get their facts from. Lot of forensic investigators here apparently.


Don't you know, in liberal justice, if you harm a minority YOU ARE GUILTY. Doesn't matter if he proved his innocence and that it was rightful and self defense in a court of his peers, he harmed a black "teenager" so therefore the white guilt train should have carried him all the way to death row.

furthermore, if the court doesn't go your way, just attack him and ruin his life! Its the lib way!


I don't like him cause he was such a wannabe cop that the kid died, it all seemed avoidable. Zimmerman wanted to serve vigilante justice and now people hate him. Boo hoo.
2014-02-15 09:24:37 PM  
1 vote:
It's funny to watch the people who were so emotionally invested in the false narrative of 'Evil white man randomly shoots black child' feel 'vindicated' by this.
2014-02-15 09:13:18 PM  
1 vote:

grimlock1972: the real tragedy of all of this is if Zimmerman had listened to the police dispatcher and not followed the kid no one need have died that night.


But don't you see? He had the RIGHT to do that? Everyone has the right to go up to black teenagers and follow them, just to be sure they aren't up to no good. Question them about their whereabouts, check to see if they are committing a crime, make sure they belong in the area. You can't be too sure of them, and if they don't comply, they are obviously dangerous gangsta thugs who are itching itching to do something bad. A good black will know their place relative to all other races. You can't be too careful with these people. They need constant monitoring.
2014-02-15 08:58:55 PM  
1 vote:

Jarhead_h: stoli n coke: It's still funny that Zim-Zim's defenders still play the "he was being slammed mercilessly into the pavement" angle, implying that he's such a weakling that he was getting dominated by someone he had 80 pounds on, yet now, Zimmerman thinks he's a boxer.

Those 80 pnds were around the middle.  Dude is pear shaped.  Trayvon was high



You realize that weed is not now, and never has been, a performance-enhancing drug, right?
Doesn't change the fact that the guy who couldn't figure out a way out of Urkel's death hold now thinks he could have beat up DMX.
gja
2014-02-15 08:37:59 PM  
1 vote:

Issame: Stopped reading after the first sentence.  What incredible, unprofessional crap.


^^^This^^^

TBogg is a coont. An asshole of amazing degrees.
gja
2014-02-15 08:35:44 PM  
1 vote:

stoli n coke: It's still funny that Zim-Zim's defenders still play the "he was being slammed mercilessly into the pavement" angle, implying that he's such a weakling that he was getting dominated by someone he had 80 pounds on, yet now, Zimmerman thinks he's a boxer.


Not going to address the actual point of this thread, but rather remind you size means SHIAT in a fight.
My sensei could beat senseless any man twice his size, and then some. Weight is especially NOT relevant.
2014-02-15 08:12:24 PM  
1 vote:

Huggermugger: All those teabaggers who 'had his back': why aren't they assisting him?


I hope his lazy ass isn't collecting welfare or SSDI.
2014-02-15 07:57:16 PM  
1 vote:
All those teabaggers who 'had his back': why aren't they assisting him?
2014-02-15 07:36:51 PM  
1 vote:

SilentStrider: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

doubtful. more likely he's blaming it on the bleeding heart libs.


It is your fault. You make criminals like Traypack, defend them. He did a heroic deed. Hopefully he sues the media. NBC or ABC, whoever it was that doctored 911 call on national TV is up crap creek.

George is a national hero.
2014-02-15 07:32:45 PM  
1 vote:

jayhawk88: the8re: Objectivity, how the Fark does it work?

He left his home, armed, chased down, shot and killed a young man who had done nothing more than walk through his yard.

Fark objectivity. He's human garbage.


Thanks for letting everyone here know that you're an idiot who knows nothing about anything. Saves us a lot of time.
2014-02-15 07:22:36 PM  
1 vote:

iheartscotch: hardinparamedic: Weatherkiss: Not everybody is the Lone Ranger. Guns typically aren't used to shoot other guns out of the hands of people. They're used to decide fights.

No. They're used to protect the lives of others who cannot be protected in any other way.

Do you know what that means? That means, unless you have no other way of doing so, you avoid the fight in the first place.

There's a reason that MOST states won't extend civil protections towards someone who ends up having to shoot the other party - even in self defense - in a fight they started or escalated in the first place.

This whole debacle could have been avoided by him doing what any other person would have done. Not get out of his car and follow someone he thought was a threat to the neighborhood to begin with alone.

THAT is why I don't feel sorry for him. This was not a rape victim shooting her attacker. This was not someone who's awoken in the house in the middle of the night and has to shoot someone to defend his family. Not someone who was carjacked. Not someone who had no other choice in the matter.

Again. He's like the guy who got lung cancer after smoking for 60 years. Tragic, but WTF did you EXPECT to happen?

I see what you're saying and I agree; you shouldn't shoot someone unless you have no other choice. I agree that, before the altercation, the zimmzamm made some pretty shiatty choices. I even agree that, had cooler minds prevailed, this entire situation might have been avoided.

The thing I've found to be the most telling about this case is how politicized it got. How everybody and their dog were howling , "Racism!", "He stalked that poor child!" and similar things.

/ I feel that, if the media hadn't picked up on it, we would have never heard a peep about it


 with the knowledge there will be at least one dip-shiat "well, THEY got rich" reply

Martin's mother asked enough, and loud enough, for an investigation to garner media attention. fwiw, that particular municipality earned the stink eye by past behavior - maybe it was a slow news day. maybe the planets aligned just right to afford her what she wanted - which, recall, was a LOCAL investigation

as a mother i would have done the same - it is over now and the media needs to leave zimmerman alone to make what life the jury left him with
2014-02-15 07:11:27 PM  
1 vote:
scholarsandrogues.files.wordpress.com
2014-02-15 07:05:16 PM  
1 vote:

BadReligion: Raging Whore Moans: No, seriously. Guns are for pussies

Well the, I won't show off my new one. Well, ok, I will. It is an extra for pussies Ruger Blackhawk .357 stainless.
[i74.photobucket.com image 752x800]


The holster is overkill.

Sweet pistol, though.
2014-02-15 07:01:08 PM  
1 vote:

Harbinger of the Doomed Rat: MugzyBrown: Harbinger of the Doomed Rat: doglover: hardinparamedic: [jokesound.files.wordpress.com image 500x333]
[i51.tinypic.com image 300x225]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 480x365]

[denver.mylittlefacewhen.com image 850x475]

[static.fjcdn.com image 493x429]

Couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole.

So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.

Meanwhile 10 innocent black teens were shot in Detroit this month and media can't even spare a second to remind us about the fact.

It's the police's job to investigate suspicious and potentially criminal activity.  It's the Neighborhood Watch's job to contact the police.  Once Zimmerman did his job, i.e. call the cops, he should have gotten the fark out of there and let the police do theirs.  Regardless of what Martin did or did not do, if Zimmerman had stuck with just "trying to do his job" none of us would have heard of either one of these people.

Some people like to take more responsibly for their neighborhoods. If people living in bad inner city neighborhoods got more involved, they would probably improve there would be a lot more dead teenagers.

FTFY


I grew up in the city with active an drug corner literally across the street. My parents shined the light on them and didn't back down. They eventually move on. criminals don't like the spotlight.
2014-02-15 07:00:52 PM  
1 vote:

craigdamage: "STAND YOUR GROUND" HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH ZIMMERMAN/TRAYVONN!!


In reality, the defense deliberately avoided a SYG defense plea because they thought they'd lose if they tried it.
2014-02-15 07:00:13 PM  
1 vote:

Geoff Peterson: Am I supposed to call this journalism? Thats the discussion we should be having


Raw Story bloggers aren't in any way supposed to be non-partisan journalist/stenographers.  That's a pretty short discussion.
2014-02-15 06:58:51 PM  
1 vote:
It's crazy how many people treat Raw Story as if it's journalism.

That being said I shed no tears for George.
2014-02-15 06:58:32 PM  
1 vote:

Miss Alexandra: I might add that Skittles and watermelon juice (which is what he had, not iced tea) along with a third ingredient (I think it's cough syrup) are used to make a drug. No, I haven't done it, but I read about it.


Was it written in crayon by a howler monkey, by chance?
2014-02-15 06:56:09 PM  
1 vote:

Mattyb710: *click*

 George Zimmerman, who once shot a young man in Florida just to watch him die...

and close.


this. Am I supposed to call this journalism? Thats the discussion we should be having...not Zimmerman part XXXXXXXXXXV11111
2014-02-15 06:56:04 PM  
1 vote:

Harbinger of the Doomed Rat: doglover: hardinparamedic: [jokesound.files.wordpress.com image 500x333]
[i51.tinypic.com image 300x225]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 480x365]

[denver.mylittlefacewhen.com image 850x475]

[static.fjcdn.com image 493x429]

Couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole.

So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.

Meanwhile 10 innocent black teens were shot in Detroit this month and media can't even spare a second to remind us about the fact.

It's the police's job to investigate suspicious and potentially criminal activity.  It's the Neighborhood Watch's job to contact the police.  Once Zimmerman did his job, i.e. call the cops, he should have gotten the fark out of there and let the police do theirs.  Regardless of what Martin did or did not do, if Zimmerman had stuck with just "trying to do his job" none of us would have heard of either one of these people.


Some people like to take more responsibly for their neighborhoods. If people living in bad inner city neighborhoods got more involved, they would probably improve
2014-02-15 06:51:58 PM  
1 vote:

sobriquet by any other name: hardinparamedic: doglover: Clearly the boy did something wrong. Zimmerman's life was ruined already, but it was a legal shooting.

Don't care. He's in this situation because of his own doing. He's like the guy who smoked for sixty years and is surprised he has lung cancer.

Yes. It was a legal shooting. Yes, it was self defense at the point he shot him. We get that.

I don't feel sorry for him. He's an idiot.

not to mention, how much of a bad-ass Gunsmateer can you be if you can't use a gun non-lethally. What, ya'll just empty the clip into the heart with your eyes closed? WTF?


Not everybody is the Lone Ranger. Guns typically aren't used to shoot other guns out of the hands of people. They're used to decide fights.
2014-02-15 06:45:50 PM  
1 vote:

I created this alt just for this thread: Vitamin Pb: leevis: GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?

From my own observations, about 75% of the black population. The other half have been victims of black on black crime and think Trayvon had it coming.

Also, about 100% of the liberal population things this is what happened.

Considering Zimmerman himself stated under oath that he followed Trayvon and ended up shooting him, how else would you describe it?  He didn't have to follow the kid, but he chose to do so, thus "hunt", and since Zimmerman is not law enforcement, any action taken against Trayvon was vigilantism.  Since he did in fact kill Trayvon, it would be accurate to describe it as a "vigilante hunt & kill."  If you or Zimmerman have an issue with that description, too f*cking bad.  A whole lot of people have an issue with Zimmerman not letting the police do their job.


I'm looking forward to reading your obituary if you every have somebody smash your head into the ground repeatedly.

Until then, keep up the good trolling, my friend.
2014-02-15 06:44:38 PM  
1 vote:

Frank N Stein: Old enough to know better: Wow, was I magically transported to Camelot overnight? Cuz there sure is a lot of White Knighting in this thread.

Calling out lies is now white knighting.


Questioning the premise on which to insert hatred towards an individual or group of individuals on Fark is white knighting. You are either part of the mob mentality or you want George Zimmerman (or whoever we're hating at the time) to sleep with you. There are no gray areas.
2014-02-15 06:42:12 PM  
1 vote:

Miss Alexandra: Uh, no.

St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him) attacked Zimmerman.  He was knocking Zimmerman's head against the ground, and in case you didn't know, you can die of head injuries.  So in a sense St. Skittles was armed--with the pavement.


No, no one calls him that. Even people who legitimately believe that it was self-defense and that the entire situation was provoked by Martin don't call him that.

Maybe you're confusing us with your friends at Stormfront.

Miss Alexandra: I might add that Skittles and watermelon juice (which is what he had, not iced tea) along with a third ingredient (I think it's cough syrup) are used to make a drug.  No, I haven't done it, but I read about it.

So St. Skittles wasn't the innocent little saint the media was portraying him as.


You might add that, but you'd demonstrate you have shiat-all idea what you're talking about. "Grape Drank" is a grain alcohol, grape juice or kool-aid, and codeine cough syrup OR promethazine (phenergan)

It's not Arizona Iced Tea and skittles, you racist flat earther moron.
2014-02-15 06:39:52 PM  
1 vote:

Old enough to know better: Wow, was I magically transported to Camelot overnight? Cuz there sure is a lot of White Knighting in this thread.


Calling out lies is now white knighting.
2014-02-15 06:36:07 PM  
1 vote:

MugzyBrown: parasol: lunging_man_ass: Wow, did the author of that article actually watch the trial and the evidence presented?

It amazes me how many people have no idea what the actual facts of the case are, and instead rely on overtly emotional notions based on ignorant Facebook slacktivism.

it amazes me that, post trial and jury dismissal that people are still trying the case.
it is over and no more arguments, pro or con, matter

what matters is this  mr zimmerman appears to be unable to find a way to fade into the multitudes of americans coast to coast - this is, btw, something that ex-cons manage to do - that he wasn't convicted and still can't manage speaks more about the man than his actions that night.

Most ex cons aren't famous and hated by a large percentage of the country


i note that the not-ex-con under discussion isn't even hated by a large percentage of the posters to this thread......cry me a river....there was a shooting....he is free, afterwards.
Freedom in this country has a long history of "doing X and reinventing self elsewhere"

i'd pay his court costs for a legal name change just to stop the time the press spends on him.
2014-02-15 06:35:14 PM  
1 vote:
Should be noted that TBogg has never claimed to be a journalist, but rather a satirical (and openly partisan) blogger.
2014-02-15 06:28:38 PM  
1 vote:
Maybe he will have an epiphany and will realize he was wrong in the way he handled and finished the situation, become a spokesperson for rational gun control, start a charity for those who are victims of needless gun violence (including Martin's parents), and become a hero of the left.

Nah. He'll just continue to associate himself with rednecks and racists who see him as their idol.
2014-02-15 06:21:25 PM  
1 vote:
Did anybody else see where he wasn't going to comment because of an impending civil rights case?
I didn't think that the Feds had enough for a civil rights case against the Zimmzamm. And the truth is; they probably don't.


/ Too many of the plebs want his blood.
2014-02-15 06:20:05 PM  
1 vote:

P. Yorck: Can't he find a job as a live-in gun store mascot? People could have their pictures taken with him like some kind of vigilante Santa and everything.


Why isn't he signing autographs at a gun show? Is it possible he's only a hero to those who can maintain their anonymity?
2014-02-15 06:19:28 PM  
1 vote:

doglover: hardinparamedic: [jokesound.files.wordpress.com image 500x333]
[i51.tinypic.com image 300x225]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 480x365]

[denver.mylittlefacewhen.com image 850x475]

[static.fjcdn.com image 493x429]

Couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole.

So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.

Meanwhile 10 innocent black teens were shot in Detroit this month and media can't even spare a second to remind us about the fact.


10?  You're off by a factor of ten
2014-02-15 06:14:25 PM  
1 vote:
Awesome article.

/Next up: George "murderous rampage" Zimmerman, sues news outlet for writing the truth.

//Real media. real news. No spin.
2014-02-15 06:10:42 PM  
1 vote:

duffblue: He was acquitted, not sure where Fark posters get their facts from. Lot of forensic investigators here apparently.


He got off pretty easy for shooting the President's son.
2014-02-15 06:09:56 PM  
1 vote:

Tourney3p0: GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?

Regardless of what caused him to shoot, he did follow a kid around with a gun and eventually shot him.


What's your point? You should be allowed to assault people who you think are following you?
2014-02-15 06:09:08 PM  
1 vote:

brownribbon: BadReligion: Raging Whore Moans: No, seriously. Guns are for pussies

Well the, I won't show off my new one. Well, ok, I will. It is an extra for pussies Ruger Blackhawk .357 stainless.
[i74.photobucket.com image 752x800]

Nice. Here is my newest (bottom) pictured with one I fixed up about a year ago:


Unless the M1 was non-functional, there is no use in "fixing it up"

/I like my beat up old Garand.
2014-02-15 06:08:37 PM  
1 vote:

leevis: GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?

From my own observations, about 75% of the black population. The other half have been victims of black on black crime and think Trayvon had it coming.


Also, about 100% of the liberal population things this is what happened.
2014-02-15 06:07:20 PM  
1 vote:

gnosis301: No kidding. Dude's a murderer, through and through, but that was one shiatty article.


I bet I can tell who never read any of Trayvon's text messages.
2014-02-15 06:07:17 PM  
1 vote:

GORDON: clancifer: I wonder if he has begun to regret his little vigilante hunt & kill episode.

Serious question: do people actually believe this happened?


From my own observations, about 75% of the black population. The other half have been victims of black on black crime and think Trayvon had it coming.
2014-02-15 06:05:46 PM  
1 vote:

lunging_man_ass: Wow, did the author of that article actually watch the trial and the evidence presented?

It amazes me how many people have no idea what the actual facts of the case are, and instead rely on overtly emotional notions based on ignorant Facebook slacktivism.


It was Raw story. It's the liberal version of Rush Limbaugh but less subtle.
2014-02-15 06:05:19 PM  
1 vote:

lunging_man_ass: Wow, did the author of that article actually watch the trial and the evidence presented? It amazes me how many people have no idea what the actual facts of the case are, and instead rely on overtly emotional notions based on ignorant Facebook slacktivism.

Considering the fact that he thinks that it was a SYG case, and all the emotional but thirst, I would say no. That said, Zimmerman is an idiot, and should probably try to lay low more than he has been.
2014-02-15 06:04:11 PM  
1 vote:
Would someone please tell that blog site to hire some editors? Or at least make the bloggers who post there put their blogs before a beta reader? Or simply admit that they are, in fact, a blog site? While I agree that George Zimmerman is a waste of space, that story should have been listed as an editorial and not a story.
2014-02-15 06:03:53 PM  
1 vote:
I think the author was masturbating while they typed.
2014-02-15 06:02:50 PM  
1 vote:

Raging Whore Moans: No, seriously. Guns are for pussies


Well the, I won't show off my new one. Well, ok, I will. It is an extra for pussies Ruger Blackhawk .357 stainless.
i74.photobucket.com
2014-02-15 05:56:41 PM  
1 vote:
*drinks*
2014-02-15 05:56:10 PM  
1 vote:
Camping.
i527.photobucket.com
 
Displayed 148 of 148 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter








In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report