Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Raw Story)   George Zimmerman no longer has a home to overzealously defend   (rawstory.com) divider line 467
    More: Cool, George Zimmerman, Ground warfare, homeless  
•       •       •

16267 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Feb 2014 at 5:52 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



467 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-02-16 03:15:53 AM  
redheededstepchild:

And if some creep was walking around my neiborhood, staring at children when they were walking back and forth to the store, carrying a gun, i would think he was some kinda pervert. We know little to nothing about the days before the shooting. We know nothing about the neiborhood. Maybe he didn' ...

And there it goes... Not only is he a big ol' gun totin' racist, but he is also a pedophile. No evidence whatsoever required..

 "Hey, don't blame me, I'm just asking questions here. but you can't PROVE he's not a racist or a pedophile.."
 
2014-02-16 03:24:38 AM  

The_Original_Roxtar: funny how media assassination and overzealous prosecution without a shred of evidence can destroy a person financially.

did I say funny? i meant tragic.


Regardless, I'm clicking the "Funny" button for you, because there is no DURP button yet.
 
2014-02-16 03:26:01 AM  

Olo Manolo: redheededstepchild:

And if some creep was walking around my neiborhood, staring at children when they were walking back and forth to the store, carrying a gun, i would think he was some kinda pervert. We know little to nothing about the days before the shooting. We know nothing about the neiborhood. Maybe he didn' ...

And there it goes... Not only is he a big ol' gun totin' racist, but he is also a pedophile. No evidence whatsoever required..

 "Hey, don't blame me, I'm just asking questions here. but you can't PROVE he's not a racist or a pedophile.."


Probably not a racist or a pedophile, murderer definitely.
 
2014-02-16 03:27:02 AM  
He followed a teenage boy home from the store. We used to warn kids about this kind of behavior. And since so many want to cast a dead guy as the 'villan' why not speculate on trey being the good guy.
 
2014-02-16 03:36:24 AM  

redheededstepchild: He followed a teenage boy home from the store. We used to warn kids about this kind of behavior. And since so many want to cast a dead guy as the 'villan' why not speculate on trey being the good guy.


So let me get this straight... Framing zimmerman as a pedophile and a racist automatically makes "ya boy trey" a good guy? Is that how this works?
 
2014-02-16 03:48:38 AM  
I never said that, but why not play both sides of the fake story thru? The only one that knows for sure what happened is having karma b%^chslap him. The universe will sort itself out.
 
2014-02-16 03:51:38 AM  

redheededstepchild: I never said that, but why not play both sides of the fake story thru? The only one that knows for sure what happened is having karma b%^chslap him. The universe will sort itself out.


y-y-yy-yyyyeahhh....... ok then....
 
2014-02-16 03:53:31 AM  
Hey where's 9beers? Zimm's BFF.
 
2014-02-16 03:57:03 AM  

Hobodeluxe: People_are_Idiots: One must admit too that Tray-Tray made a couple of mistakes. First, he shouldn't look like someone who is going to rob a store (ie leave off the hood). Secondly, when you realize you're being followed, turn and confront the follower nicely (a simple "Hey how ya doin'?" and a smile works for me). Thirdly, do NOT try to invoke someone's anger, especially in a state with concealed carry.

1. it was raining. I find it funny you would think that wearing a hood in the rain would be justification for profiling

2. he tried to approach him while he was in the vehicle and George rolled up his window and wouldn't talk to him. The he followed him in his vehicle and when he couldn't anymore he got out and did it on foot.  I find it funny you put the burden to "defuse the situation" on the kid on the phone to his girlfriend walking home in the rain and not the stalker with a gun following him home.


1. Usually I never wear a hood when it rains. I carry an umbrella. I also typically don't WALK in the rain.

2. I usually pay a guy in the car no mind, until they -start- following. I -then- would confront "NICELY." Wanna know how he confronted him? Most likely (typically how I have heard other kids 15-18 confront) "Hey what's your problem man?" and getting ready to land blows.
 
2014-02-16 04:27:37 AM  
All the Zimmerman White Knights can go fark themselves. That sonofabiatch got away with murder, as plain as O.J. did.

/hope he dies alone and miserable
 
2014-02-16 04:44:40 AM  

vygramul: atomicmask: vygramul: Nutsac_Jim: mrshowrules: and if you have to shoot a kid to avoid a beating you asked for, you are a coward who deserves to go to jail

Walking down the sidewalk is a crime with a punishment of beating?   Which ghetto?

Facts not in evidence. We only have Zimmerman's word that Martin started the fight.

That and the witnesses...

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-beaten-prosecution-witness es /story?id=19517236

But I mean keep denying facts and making up the "sweet black baby" story you keep grasping at.

Just because he lost the fight didn't mean he didn't start it. The witnesses don't help establish who started it.

But I mean keep asserting facts for which you have no evidence and make up the "well-meaning good-guy" story you keep grasping at.


And you have no evidence he did start it, you are just assuming. You keep asserting that zimmerman started it, no witnesses saw that, what they did see was martin on top of him assaulting him, so that is the fact we know. That fact alone gives him right to self defense including lethal self defense, deal with it lib.

fredklein: atomicmask: http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/23/justice/florida-zimmerman-defense/

Was suspended 3 times for dealing drugs and doing them at school.

That link does not back up that statement. "Items taken from Trayvon Martin's cell phone -- including a text-message discussion of drug use and pictures of a gun and marijuana plants". Nothing about school, nothing about suspension, nothing about any real evidence of drug use.

Other articles (like http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/Trayvon-Martin-Suspended-From-School-Thre e-Times-Report-144403305.html) do indeed mention that he was "suspended three times in a series of incidents that included getting caught spraying graffiti and carrying an empty baggie with traces of marijuana"..."Martin's third suspension was for tardiness and truancy". So, ONE suspension had to do with drugs, and only barely.

http://www.slate.com/articles/life/florida/features/2013/oh_florida/ tr ayvon_martin_creepy_ass_cracker_what_cracker_means_in_florida.html

Called Zimmerman a "creepy ass cracker" went home, turned around and came out side to "whip his ass"

Sorry, again, not supported by actual evidence. Rachel Jeantel actually said that ""I called him back. I asked him where he was," she recounted. He told her that he was nearly back at this father's fiancée's house in Sanford." [Emphasis added]. Considering he had walked a mile or so back from the store, being a few hundred feet away from home would easily be considered "nearly" home. So, there is basically NO evidence that Trayvon "went home, turned around" and came back.

To the contrary, it was Zimmerman who was looking for Trayvon. From the Timeline:

7:11:33 - Zimmerman tells the police dispatcher that Trayvon Martin is running.

7:11:59 - In reply to the dispatcher's question, "Are you following him?" Zimmerman responds with, "Yes." Dispatcher: "OK, we don't need you to do that." Zimmerman: "OK."

...

7:16:11 - First 911 call from witness about a fight, calls for help heard.


N ...


OH well that clears it up, I mean, being suspended for having a baggy with trace amounts of pot is not the same thing as having drugs..

Clearly your stereotype of the innocent sweet black baby sitting on the curb out front playing with his hot wheels and eating skittles is true. 

Martin: "Hey mister, want some skittles?"

ZImmerman: BWHAAWHWHHHHAWWWWRRRR! BANG BANG BANG BANG

Martin: But, but, I will miss my youth ministry session if I die...

Zimmerman: KILL ALL BLACK CHILDREN, RAWWWWRRRRR

So basically everything is like a spike lee film to you?
 
2014-02-16 04:49:24 AM  

gja: That's why you are supposed to ear PANTS


s3.amazonaws.com
 
2014-02-16 04:54:47 AM  

Olo Manolo: redheededstepchild: He followed a teenage boy home from the store. We used to warn kids about this kind of behavior. And since so many want to cast a dead guy as the 'villan' why not speculate on trey being the good guy.

So let me get this straight... Framing zimmerman as a pedophile and a racist automatically makes "ya boy trey" a good guy? Is that how this works?


Ya boy? In quotes for some reason? How obviously racist can you guys be? I do like how this whole issue made knowing who the dipshiat racists on this site easier.
 
2014-02-16 04:55:13 AM  
4.bp.blogspot.com
 
2014-02-16 05:05:11 AM  
TheJoe03:
Ya boy? In quotes for some reason? How obviously racist can you guys be? I do like how this whole issue made knowing who the dipshiat racists on this site easier.


Right. I'm a racist.

and you are a unicorn. So deal with it, dipshiat..
 
2014-02-16 05:10:11 AM  

Olo Manolo: TheJoe03:
Ya boy? In quotes for some reason? How obviously racist can you guys be? I do like how this whole issue made knowing who the dipshiat racists on this site easier.


Right. I'm a racist.

and you are a unicorn. So deal with it, dipshiat..


That's your response? Why did you say "ya boy"? You're making black jokes but in a serious manner. It's kinda racist, you can deny it all you want. As a fan of jokes and comedy I'd say it wouldn't be racist if your black joke actually had a punchline and wasn't trying to be part of your "argument".
 
2014-02-16 05:17:12 AM  

TheJoe03: That's your response? Why did you say "ya boy"? You're making black jokes but in a serious manner.



Why am I even doing this... geez...

First off, "ya boy" was in reference to dude calling him "trey" as if though they were on a first name basis.

Second off, according to the rules of what race can say what and get away with it, I can say "ya boy" and mean it in reference to black people all I want, since I'm "half black" (from a mixed family)..
 
2014-02-16 05:20:01 AM  
All I'm saying is that you can defend Zimmerman without using obvious racial language, it makes your side and your point more kosher. If this really wasn't about race like your side claims, why use race in your initial arguments. Wait for the other side to bring in race and say race wasn't a part of it and here's why what Zimmerman did was just. It makes the argument clearer from your perspective and makes people on the fence not think you ARE actually a racist that rooted against the general black position based on your view on historic American race relations. I clearly separate posters like you from non racist people that think Zimmerman was acting in reasonable self defense.
 
2014-02-16 05:32:10 AM  

TheJoe03: All I'm saying is that you can defend Zimmerman without using obvious racial language, it makes your side and your point more kosher. If this really wasn't about race like your side claims, why use race in your initial arguments. Wait for the other side to bring in race and say race wasn't a part of it and here's why what Zimmerman did was just. It makes the argument clearer from your perspective and makes people on the fence not think you ARE actually a racist that rooted against the general black position based on your view on historic American race relations. I clearly separate posters like you from non racist people that think Zimmerman was acting in reasonable self defense.



And you can reserve use of the term "racist" for people that deserve it. Just because you feel something was meant in a derogatory manner, doesn't mean it inherently is so.. If you had been watching me say the same thing I just said, but on tv (where you would assume I was black based on my appearance, instead of assuming I was white based on my "racism") nothing I said would have triggered your "That's racist!" response. It's a ridiculous double standard, but that's clearly the way it works.
 
2014-02-16 05:36:25 AM  

Olo Manolo: TheJoe03: All I'm saying is that you can defend Zimmerman without using obvious racial language, it makes your side and your point more kosher. If this really wasn't about race like your side claims, why use race in your initial arguments. Wait for the other side to bring in race and say race wasn't a part of it and here's why what Zimmerman did was just. It makes the argument clearer from your perspective and makes people on the fence not think you ARE actually a racist that rooted against the general black position based on your view on historic American race relations. I clearly separate posters like you from non racist people that think Zimmerman was acting in reasonable self defense.


And you can reserve use of the term "racist" for people that deserve it. Just because you feel something was meant in a derogatory manner, doesn't mean it inherently is so.. If you had been watching me say the same thing I just said, but on tv (where you would assume I was black based on my appearance, instead of assuming I was white based on my "racism") nothing I said would have triggered your "That's racist!" response. It's a ridiculous double standard, but that's clearly the way it works.


That's a serious dodge of what I said. If this wasn't about race why constantly use racial language? It makes your argument weak and makes you appear to be racists to other people.
 
2014-02-16 05:42:08 AM  
Okay, you're half black, great. That doesn't change my point in any way, so many pissed off white guys have been using racist language and your side is stuck with that label. By continuing to play into that racial bs your argument isn't clear. You're adding a barrier of racist shiat that is a big deal I a country like this that people don't even know whether or not what the Z Man did was justified. You're to busy confusing the issue by being racial when this should be about right and wrong in the terms of self defense. I'm trying to help you here.
 
2014-02-16 05:47:19 AM  
It's not a dodge, its ignoring your non-sense. First claiming that I was racially charged in my comment, then making another argument based on the same flawed premise that I am "constantly using racial language". Please, continue looking at everything through that lens though, I'm sure if you keep up with it long enough somebody will agree with you and validate your ridiculous claims.

This thread is boring now.
 
2014-02-16 05:52:45 AM  

Olo Manolo: It's not a dodge, its ignoring your non-sense. First claiming that I was racially charged in my comment, then making another argument based on the same flawed premise that I am "constantly using racial language". Please, continue looking at everything through that lens though, I'm sure if you keep up with it long enough somebody will agree with you and validate your ridiculous claims.

This thread is boring now.


Really? Are you reading my words? Make your case for Zimmerman without being racial and you sound smarter. I challenge you right now to argue Zimmermans case without bringing up race. That's all Im saying but I feel you're not getting that. BTW, I'm not saying you've been constantly using racial language, I'm saying your side has. Don't be so self absorbed. This isn't personal, that should be obvious.
 
2014-02-16 05:57:27 AM  
"You kids today are nothin but punks, sissified, so quick to pick up a gun, scared to take an ass whipping. (holds up fists) This is what makes you a man" John Witherspoon, Friday.

Yeah, George was being beat to death by the first-time, I'm going to kill you with my bear hands, unarmed teenager who was walking home and just flipped out, turning into a vicious killer that will beat you till you're dead. Doesn't it take a serious violent past to become a person like that? Just a thought.

Tray was a punk, but not a criminal and George may have had a right to defend himself, and probably was, but if he knew how to actually fight, Tray would still be alive. An actual cop would have tasered the kid.

Doesn't matter, because it's over, I just hope people won't start to rely on lazily pulling a trigger instead of being afraid to get their ass kicked every know and then.
 
2014-02-16 06:00:20 AM  
Yes I am reading your words, like where you are saying "you" and "you're" then in the next post saying it's not in reference to me. You aren't trying to have a discussion, you are trying to be right. The only way a consensus will be reached is if it stop and concede, and that doesn't sound like fun to me.

I'd rather go jerk it to some weird stuff now.. Maybe something to do with pastries, or pillows...
 
2014-02-16 06:01:30 AM  

Zizzowop: "You kids today are nothin but punks, sissified, so quick to pick up a gun, scared to take an ass whipping. (holds up fists) This is what makes you a man" John Witherspoon, Friday.

Yeah, George was being beat to death by the first-time, I'm going to kill you with my bear hands, unarmed teenager who was walking home and just flipped out, turning into a vicious killer that will beat you till you're dead. Doesn't it take a serious violent past to become a person like that? Just a thought.

Tray was a punk, but not a criminal and George may have had a right to defend himself, and probably was, but if he knew how to actually fight, Tray would still be alive. An actual cop would have tasered the kid.

Doesn't matter, because it's over, I just hope people won't start to rely on lazily pulling a trigger instead of being afraid to get their ass kicked every know and then.


Bam, this guy just made a reasonable argument without sounding like a racist douche. I actually read that and considered the opinion. Now the argument is more nuanced. Good shiat dude.
 
2014-02-16 06:04:23 AM  

Olo Manolo: Yes I am reading your words, like where you are saying "you" and "you're" then in the next post saying it's not in reference to me. You aren't trying to have a discussion, you are trying to be right. The only way a consensus will be reached is if it stop and concede, and that doesn't sound like fun to me.

I'd rather go jerk it to some weird stuff now.. Maybe something to do with pastries, or pillows...


Well I was talking to you and you represent that side to me. I am trying to be right, that's the point of having an opinion and arguing. If you weren't so wrong then I wouldn't be right, am I right? Have fun jerkin it.

/did I just break a trolls brain?
 
2014-02-16 06:09:26 AM  
You kind of admitted that it would be boring to argue your side without bringing up race, why is that? That's all I wanted out of our discussion. Oh well.
 
2014-02-16 06:10:26 AM  

Miss Alexandra: St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him)


Maybe the retard brigade called him that, but rational, sane people didn't.

//I know which group I'm favouriting you as.
 
2014-02-16 06:11:30 AM  

TheJoe03: Olo Manolo: Yes I am reading your words, like where you are saying "you" and "you're" then in the next post saying it's not in reference to me. You aren't trying to have a discussion, you are trying to be right. The only way a consensus will be reached is if it stop and concede, and that doesn't sound like fun to me.

I'd rather go jerk it to some weird stuff now.. Maybe something to do with pastries, or pillows...

Well I was talking to you and you represent that side to me. I am trying to be right, that's the point of having an opinion and arguing. If you weren't so wrong then I wouldn't be right, am I right? Have fun jerkin it.

/did I just break a trolls brain?


Go back to your Weeners to me, then read it without assuming it is racist (since it wasn't, you just happened to read it that way).  Now see that the rest of this conversation talking about race wouldn't have happened without your initial assumption. How exactly am I the one stuck on it when it is all in direct response to what you have said to me? lol

wanna see me naked?
 
2014-02-16 06:15:00 AM  

Olo Manolo: TheJoe03: Olo Manolo: Yes I am reading your words, like where you are saying "you" and "you're" then in the next post saying it's not in reference to me. You aren't trying to have a discussion, you are trying to be right. The only way a consensus will be reached is if it stop and concede, and that doesn't sound like fun to me.

I'd rather go jerk it to some weird stuff now.. Maybe something to do with pastries, or pillows...

Well I was talking to you and you represent that side to me. I am trying to be right, that's the point of having an opinion and arguing. If you weren't so wrong then I wouldn't be right, am I right? Have fun jerkin it.

/did I just break a trolls brain?

Go back to your Weeners to me, then read it without assuming it is racist (since it wasn't, you just happened to read it that way).  Now see that the rest of this conversation talking about race wouldn't have happened without your initial assumption. How exactly am I the one stuck on it when it is all in direct response to what you have said to me? lol

wanna see me naked?


That proves my point, I assumed you were racist because your side is constantly using racial language and you did as well. if you argued without racial bs I would have more readily considered your point and not assumed anything. You came off as a troll when you could of came across as someone with a rational opinion. sorry. I assumed what I did, but it's your fault. This is the internet and we are using words here. Still waiting for you to defend Zimmerman without being racial. That will end this.
 
2014-02-16 06:26:30 AM  
Zimmerman called 911 because he saw somebody that he didn't recognize walking through his neighbors yards, he found this suspicious so he intended to keep an eye on him until police showed up. Martin left the scene unharmed, situation over. If he had concerns for his well-being he should have "called the cops and let them do their job" but no, he returned to the scene and a confrontation ensued.

that better?
 
2014-02-16 06:31:22 AM  

Olo Manolo: Zimmerman called 911 because he saw somebody that he didn't recognize walking through his neighbors yards, he found this suspicious so he intended to keep an eye on him until police showed up. Martin left the scene unharmed, situation over. If he had concerns for his well-being he should have "called the cops and let them do their job" but no, he returned to the scene and a confrontation ensued.

that better?


Much.
 
2014-02-16 06:33:38 AM  

TheJoe03: Olo Manolo: Zimmerman called 911 because he saw somebody that he didn't recognize walking through his neighbors yards, he found this suspicious so he intended to keep an eye on him until police showed up. Martin left the scene unharmed, situation over. If he had concerns for his well-being he should have "called the cops and let them do their job" but no, he returned to the scene and a confrontation ensued.

that better?

Much.


I still love you
 
2014-02-16 06:39:04 AM  

Olo Manolo: TheJoe03: Olo Manolo: Zimmerman called 911 because he saw somebody that he didn't recognize walking through his neighbors yards, he found this suspicious so he intended to keep an eye on him until police showed up. Martin left the scene unharmed, situation over. If he had concerns for his well-being he should have "called the cops and let them do their job" but no, he returned to the scene and a confrontation ensued.

that better?

Much.

I still love you


How could you not? By something like that? Fair enough.
 
2014-02-16 06:40:36 AM  
By saying something like that I mean. I need to stop farking on an iPad, screws me up ,
 
2014-02-16 06:56:13 AM  
i182.photobucket.com
 
2014-02-16 07:41:05 AM  

doglover: hardinparamedic: [jokesound.files.wordpress.com image 500x333]
[i51.tinypic.com image 300x225]

[bbsimg.ngfiles.com image 480x365]

[denver.mylittlefacewhen.com image 850x475]

[static.fjcdn.com image 493x429]

Couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole.

So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.

Meanwhile 10 innocent black teens were shot in Detroit this month and media can't even spare a second to remind us about the fact.


He wasn't doing his job, in fact, the development actually didn't want him doing this. Especially doing this while armed. He was entirely doing the whole neighborhood watch gig of his own accord. Of course, the local police were cheering him on.

Mr Zimmerman is doing just fine defining himself as an asshole and doesn't need any assistance from "liberal" bloggers.
 
2014-02-16 07:42:09 AM  

brownribbon: BadReligion: Raging Whore Moans: No, seriously. Guns are for pussies

Well the, I won't show off my new one. Well, ok, I will. It is an extra for pussies Ruger Blackhawk .357 stainless.
[i74.photobucket.com image 752x800]

Nice. Here is my newest (bottom) pictured with one I fixed up about a year ago:

[i.imgur.com image 850x637]


Absolutely at the TOP of my "WANT" list!!!
Jealous...
 
2014-02-16 08:07:16 AM  

jeffowl: lunging_man_ass: Wow, did the author of that article actually watch the trial and the evidence presented?

It amazes me how many people have no idea what the actual facts of the case are, and instead rely on overtly emotional notions based on ignorant Facebook slacktivism.

It was Raw story. It's the liberal version of Rush Limbaugh but less subtle.


Less subtle than Rush? I don't think that such a thing is possible
 
2014-02-16 08:25:05 AM  

Farkage: brownribbon: BadReligion: Raging Whore Moans: No, seriously. Guns are for pussies

Well the, I won't show off my new one. Well, ok, I will. It is an extra for pussies Ruger Blackhawk .357 stainless.
[i74.photobucket.com image 752x800]

Nice. Here is my newest (bottom) pictured with one I fixed up about a year ago:

[i.imgur.com image 850x637]

Absolutely at the TOP of my "WANT" list!!!
Jealous...


Why jealous? It's a tool, not a toy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kU0XCVey_U
 
2014-02-16 08:30:13 AM  
This thread is certainly full of names I've never seen before, defending Zimmerman and pooping all over Rawstory.
 
2014-02-16 08:30:13 AM  

hardinparamedic: Miss Alexandra: Uh, no.

St. Skittles (that's what some of us call him) attacked Zimmerman.  He was knocking Zimmerman's head against the ground, and in case you didn't know, you can die of head injuries.  So in a sense St. Skittles was armed--with the pavement.

No, no one calls him that. Even people who legitimately believe that it was self-defense and that the entire situation was provoked by Martin don't call him that.

Maybe you're confusing us with your friends at Stormfront.

Miss Alexandra: I might add that Skittles and watermelon juice (which is what he had, not iced tea) along with a third ingredient (I think it's cough syrup) are used to make a drug.  No, I haven't done it, but I read about it.

So St. Skittles wasn't the innocent little saint the media was portraying him as.

You might add that, but you'd demonstrate you have shiat-all idea what you're talking about. "Grape Drank" is a grain alcohol, grape juice or kool-aid, and codeine cough syrup OR promethazine (phenergan)

It's not Arizona Iced Tea and skittles, you racist flat earther moron.


Read this lady's profile. She believes in farking geocentricism
 
gja
2014-02-16 08:36:58 AM  

cretinbob: gja: That's why you are supposed to ear PANTS

[s3.amazonaws.com image 320x212]


Yeah yeah yeah....Ya got me. Typoville, population:me
But of course you know it was supposed to say "That's why you wear PANTS."
 
gja
2014-02-16 08:43:17 AM  

LoneWolf343: This thread is certainly full of names I've never seen before, defending Zimmerman and pooping all over Rawstory.


I am NOT defending RS, but RS is a pocketful-of-assholes.
And Tom Boggioni is a bigger asshole than I can express.
His package of libel based schadenfreude and vitriol shows his true character.
 
2014-02-16 08:46:29 AM  

doglover: So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.


He could just you know, stay out of the spotlight? Or did someone make him do a televised interview? Did someone make him get arrested numerous times since his acquittal? Did someone make him agree to "celebrity" boxing (thrusting him back in the spotlight again) - even though I gather that's not happening now.

The best way to not be in the spotlight is to not put yourself there. The only reason anyone is talking about him today is he did a televised interview.
 
gja
2014-02-16 08:59:52 AM  

serpent_sky: doglover: So for defending himself and trying to do his job he should lose his home and stay forever in the spotlight because the thug who attacked him happened to be black.

He could just you know, stay out of the spotlight? Or did someone make him do a televised interview? Did someone make him get arrested numerous times since his acquittal? Did someone make him agree to "celebrity" boxing (thrusting him back in the spotlight again) - even though I gather that's not happening now.

The best way to not be in the spotlight is to not put yourself there. The only reason anyone is talking about him today is he did a televised interview.


That right there is nice and sensible advice. Of course old George isn't really chock-full-o-sense.
Were he to be someone with clear thinking after the trial cleared him he would have fell off the radar utterly.
It wouldn't have been that hard. Just blow town, hire a lawyer to deal with the ex, take no offers so daytime TV expoit shows, etc..
Hell after a year or two you are back to people not remembering much about you.
 
2014-02-16 09:05:52 AM  

Majick Thise: The spin... IT. IS. TOOMUCH. SPIN.


I couldn't read past the first paragraph.

What the fark was that shiat?

That paragraph alone, that's flat out provable slander. Hope he sues them.
 
2014-02-16 09:16:04 AM  

gja: LoneWolf343: This thread is certainly full of names I've never seen before, defending Zimmerman and pooping all over Rawstory.

I am NOT defending RS, but RS is a pocketful-of-assholes.
And Tom Boggioni is a bigger asshole than I can express.
His package of libel based schadenfreude and vitriol shows his true character.


Mr B's lack of tact notwithstanding, I'm more acutely aware of a bunch of troll alts screaming foul over what is at worst a bad joke. But, surprise surprise, people get "vitriolic" when someone kills an unarmed kid and gets away with it, and derive pleasure from what little vengeance they are allowed. Who'd have thunk it? If it wasn't for the criminal incompetence of the authorities in the matter, Zimmerman would have been forgotten by now.
 
2014-02-16 09:19:48 AM  
Holy shiat look at all the Zimmer Rimmers.  Why don't you give him a home, he might cuddle with you.

It's hilarious how these people need to paint a picture in their heads of an innocent guy who just happened to have a gun being jumped by a drugged out black "thug".  You're just projecting your own fears.  The facts of Zimmerman's pursuit and stalking behavior and subsequent violent and reckless activities are meaningless to you, but TM being a kid and acting like one is somehow proof he was a Superpredator luring Zimbo to an ambush.

Amazing level of self-bullshiatting.
 
Displayed 50 of 467 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report