TheJoe03: TOSViolation: Aussie_As: TOSViolation: Aussie_As: TOSViolation: They also discovered the Sickle cell gene too, but that doesn't mean we celebrate the fact that people are afflicted with it and refuse to treat them for the condition.There's a fairly clear genetic basis to race as well. Which ones are you thinking of "treating"?Race is not an affliction. Homosexuality is an affliction much the same as Pica.You're hilarious.Your humor-detection is faulty. This is not a joke. No one should ever WANT to be gay. It's an affliction. No one should want to be agoraphobic or have OCD either. There are plenty of afflictions for which we have no good treatment or cure. Look how many people have cancer. Look how many people are morbidly obese. Very few people WANT to be morbidly obese, but still continue to overeat.If there was a simple pill that would permanently cure breast cancer, Sickle cell, type 1 diabetes, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, Parkinsons, or yes...HOMOSEXUALITY before (or after) symptoms show up, then the patient would be a fool not to take it (assuming no negative side effects).There is no benefit to being gay. There are plenty of gay people who make perfectly good contributions to the world which would not suffer one bit if they weren't gay. It's not an asset.Are you really comparing being gay with having cancer? Are you really that stupid?
Fafai: omeganuepsilon: I'm curious if I'm marked at all. I could certainly use a good laugh.I just want to know how many times I'm marked as anti-feminist. I can think of at least 6. Anti-feminist isn't the same thing as anti-woman, so that's fine by me. I am opposed to self-serving academic circle-jerkery, yes.What is the point tallying this stuff? So that you know exactly how much to hate or disregard people? Posts should stand alone and speak for themselves. I actually removed all my tags. While it's helpful for remembering people, I find it's a tool that ultimately limits meaningful discourse around here because people just get pigeonholed for saying something once (or twice or x4), and they become reduced to that one thing.
TheJoe03: I have you marked as racist if that makes you laugh.
Gleeman: TOSViolation:[www.reactiongifs.com image 420x315]
ciberido: montex: If there is a "gay gene", then how is it possible that sometimes identical twins can sometimes have one gay and one straight?Because the gay gene, if it even exists, is unlikely to be the only factor.
06Wahoo: ciberido: montex: If there is a "gay gene", then how is it possible that sometimes identical twins can sometimes have one gay and one straight?Because the gay gene, if it even exists, is unlikely to be the only factor.Odd, since so many people insist that it is genetic, and won't even consider any other possibilities.
ciberido: 06Wahoo: ciberido: montex: If there is a "gay gene", then how is it possible that sometimes identical twins can sometimes have one gay and one straight?Because the gay gene, if it even exists, is unlikely to be the only factor.Odd, since so many people insist that it is genetic, and won't even consider any other possibilities.Really? I wasn't aware of that. Care to list a few people who "won't consider any other possibilities"?
studebaker hoch: Stinkyy:[img.fark.net image 482x315]Your brain, dude. srsly
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jun 27 2017 05:49:49
Runtime: 0.291 sec (290 ms)