Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Inside Bay Area)   Knock knock. Who's there? Home Invasion. Home invasion who? Home inva...powpowpowpowpow   (insidebayarea.com) divider line 38
    More: Fail, Hayward Police Department  
•       •       •

16620 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Feb 2014 at 1:47 PM (50 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-02-10 12:18:44 PM  
14 votes:
So he hit two of them, but missed the third one?

Ski one penalty lap and get back in the race. You can still catch the Norwegian.
2014-02-10 12:51:42 PM  
10 votes:
The homeowner was a fox?
2014-02-10 02:11:05 PM  
7 votes:

Silly_Sot: Headso: Silly_Sot: How long before liberal outrage demands the resident be prosecuted for daring to have a firearm and use it in legitimate self-defense?

not as fast a whiny conservative plays the victim apparently.

I GOT ONE!
I GOT ONE!


Great kid, don't get cocky.
2014-02-10 04:02:53 PM  
5 votes:

DarkVader: craigdamage: ....again, this happened in the Bay Area. There are strict anti-gun ordinances in San Francisco.

I seem to recall that homeowners are NOT allowed to have handguns. (I don't know if a pistol was used in this story)


http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Municipalities-can-t-ban-peopl e- from-owning-3298553.php

So nope.


As I recall, a number of firearm-opposing individuals were quite butthurt when their Proposition H was taken away.
2014-02-10 02:28:37 PM  
3 votes:

thamike: JesseL: Hardly anyone really wants to kill anyone in self defense.

[www.caracol.com.co image 340x255]

Hardly.



DRINK

img.fark.net

2014-02-10 02:06:29 PM  
3 votes:
I. Am. Your singing telegram.
2014-02-10 01:59:42 PM  
3 votes:

Headso: Silly_Sot: How long before liberal outrage demands the resident be prosecuted for daring to have a firearm and use it in legitimate self-defense?

not as fast a whiny conservative plays the victim apparently.


I GOT ONE!
I GOT ONE!
2014-02-10 01:57:09 PM  
3 votes:

diaphoresis: Guns kill people... guns occasionally miss.


This is why there needs to be more gun control.  If the homeowner had more gun control, none of them would have gotten away.
/get back to the range.
2014-02-10 01:50:11 PM  
3 votes:
image.blingee.com
2014-02-10 12:44:29 PM  
3 votes:
Will gladly sing praises to the homeowner:

www.pure7studios.com
2014-02-10 05:01:10 PM  
2 votes:

darch: Galloping Galoshes: As a pro-gun rights farker, I say confidently that there's not enough info in that story to draw any conclusion, other than there's a dead guy leaking on the rug.

As a cop I DEFINITELY would want to see more information on this. There's a LOT of holes in this account.


Almost as many as in the victim :)
2014-02-10 04:49:53 PM  
2 votes:

Boojum2k: Deep Contact: 2 notches on the front door. Nice.

Little silhouettes would look better.


img0.etsystatic.com
2014-02-10 02:27:21 PM  
2 votes:

thamike: JesseL: Hardly anyone really wants to kill anyone in self defense.



Hardly.


8 months later, still butthurt.
2014-02-10 02:12:47 PM  
2 votes:

CanuckInCA: Silly_Sot: How long before liberal outrage demands the resident be prosecuted for daring to have a firearm and use it in legitimate self-defense?

I seriously doubt you'll see people advocating the prosecution of somebody defending themselves in a home invasion no matter how liberal they are, but please continue trolling...


I dunno, if you get home-invaded in the UK, I'm pretty sure you can be found criminally liable if you don't offer the invader a spot of tea and some biscuits.
2014-02-10 02:00:55 PM  
2 votes:

kronicfeld: The homeowner was a fox?


img.fark.net
2014-02-10 12:52:11 PM  
2 votes:
yeah, let me go get my crying towel.  I'll be right back...
2014-02-10 12:25:17 PM  
2 votes:
Good.
But you need more range time.
2014-02-11 08:00:12 AM  
1 votes:
As a detective for Scotland Yard, 3 time biathlon champ, and a fairly decent break dancer I think this story needs fresher beats.
2014-02-10 04:52:22 PM  
1 votes:

AngryDragon: Darth_Lukecash: Did you even read that link? what they wrote?

Given the reference to "a well regulated Militia" and "the security of a free State," the ACLU has long taken the position that the Second Amendment protects a collective right rather than an individual right. For seven decades, the Supreme Court's 1939 decision in United States v. Miller was widely understood to have endorsed that view. This position is currently under review and is being updated by the ACLU National Board in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in D.C. v. Heller in 2008.

The sad thing is, the ACLU is right on this issue. The Founding Fathers envisioned a country that had no standing Military. That the populace would form an army if one was required. An earlier Supreme Court Ruling said that it was a collective right, not a an individual right.

The Supreme Court decision wasn't Unanimous - it's the 5-4 politically charged split we've come to expect. All because five conservatives declared that a comma meant the Malitia part was an example, not the requirement that the framers intended

Yes I did read it.  SCOTUS' interpretation immediately becomes law of the land.  Period.  It's been 6 years.  How long do they need to debate it?  They are not right because there is now Supreme Court precedent.  It doesn't matter what the split was the decision has been made.


The ACLU is simply acknowledging that rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States are not necessarily the final word on Constitutionality, a position held by many truly great intellectual minds. Such as Senator Rand Paul.
2014-02-10 04:46:24 PM  
1 votes:
i.imgur.com
2014-02-10 04:38:23 PM  
1 votes:
There I Was:

Referendum restricting handguns was passed in 2005 but was struck down by courts before it could go into effect.  As an added bonus, the city of San Francisco was compelled to pay $380,000 to the NRA and other plaintiffs to cover their costs of litigating Proposition H.

Ineffective balm for assholes costs the city a lot of money. Who knew?
2014-02-10 04:22:14 PM  
1 votes:
Seems like a good thread to ask, do they sell a gun-shaped fleshlight?
2014-02-10 03:40:22 PM  
1 votes:

crusher2: In my county, two guys saw their stolen golf cart on a trailer behind a pickup truck. They turned around, ran them down, shot the tires out, and held them until police arrived. Now THEY are being charged for firing into a vehicle. smh


reneedezvous.files.wordpress.com
2014-02-10 03:36:40 PM  
1 votes:

Ow! That was my feelings!: Good example of why someone would need more than 7 or 10 or fill-in-the-blank arbitrary number of rounds. There can be more than one assailant.


According to at least one farker I recall, needing more than 6 shots means you're either a terrible shot or you should just accept that you're screwed and die.
2014-02-10 03:00:54 PM  
1 votes:
JesseL:

If was going to take away people's guns it would only be to create market demand so I could sell them new ones. That would probably upset the customers though.


Cash for Clunkers
2014-02-10 02:58:16 PM  
1 votes:

Nana's Vibrator: JesseL: Nana's Vibrator: Smeggy Smurf: No, he needs more range time or a scattergun.  1 out of 3 isn't good enough

Though not confirmed, it's 2 out of 3 were shot; 1 was killed, and one was brought to the hospital with gunshot wounds.  She lived likely because of the gun control laws and how they always hurt women among other people who benefit from doing illegal alien minority things while the government tries to take my freedomballs.

Did you just have a stroke, or did your overzealous efforts to use sarcasm and irony collapse into some sort of derpy singularity from which meaning can't possibly escape?

you want to take away peoples' guns and now you're attacking my speech freedom so that dangerous criminals can live while you work on their tax money for border jumping Obamacare welfare thieves national debt?


o_0

If was going to take away people's guns it would only be to create market demand so I could sell them new ones. That would probably upset the customers though.

/unabashed and fully licensed merchant of death
2014-02-10 02:48:47 PM  
1 votes:

cig-mkr: I own and believe in guns, but I don't think I'd ever want to kill someone in my house. I would if need be, but really wouldn't want to. A gun is like a jack in your car, don't ever want to use one but will if I have to.


Why do you carry a jack in your car? Are you one of those pussies that lives in fear of a flat tire?
2014-02-10 02:34:12 PM  
1 votes:
Don't do the crime if you can't dodge bullets.
2014-02-10 02:17:43 PM  
1 votes:

Galloping Galoshes: I'm not familiar with the hours home invaders keep, but this could be anything from a straightforward home invasion to a bad drug deal.


encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com
2014-02-10 02:16:49 PM  
1 votes:

cig-mkr: I own and believe in guns, but I don't think I'd ever want to kill someone in my house. I would if need be, but really wouldn't want to. A gun is like a jack in your car, don't ever want to use one but will if I have to.


Does insurance cover replacing the carpet?  Plus you probably have to repaint the wall he was standing in front of.

We should encourage home invaders to break in via the kitchen; the linoleum (or tile) is much easier to clean.
2014-02-10 02:07:28 PM  
1 votes:
Well. I guess you'll just have to imagine lolitrolu.jpg there.
2014-02-10 01:58:38 PM  
1 votes:

darch: Galloping Galoshes: As a pro-gun rights farker, I say confidently that there's not enough info in that story to draw any conclusion, other than there's a dead guy leaking on the rug.

As a cop I DEFINITELY would want to see more information on this. There's a LOT of holes in this account. That's some fine reporting there, Lou.


Some holes in the dead guy, too, apparently.
2014-02-10 01:57:42 PM  
1 votes:

Silly_Sot: How long before liberal outrage demands the resident be prosecuted for daring to have a firearm and use it in legitimate self-defense?


About as soon as your other fantasy of farking Amanda Knox happens.
2014-02-10 01:57:18 PM  
1 votes:

Silly_Sot: How long before liberal outrage demands the resident be prosecuted for daring to have a firearm and use it in legitimate self-defense?


not as fast a whiny conservative plays the victim apparently.
2014-02-10 01:57:09 PM  
1 votes:
they found a deceased man who had appeared to have been shot,

Appeared to have been shot?
I'm pretty sure you'll know if someone has been shot or not.
2014-02-10 01:50:42 PM  
1 votes:
As a pro-gun rights farker, I say confidently that there's not enough info in that story to draw any conclusion, other than there's a dead guy leaking on the rug.
2014-02-10 01:49:55 PM  
1 votes:

ManateeGag: Dancin_In_Anson: I love a story with a happy ending.

for once, I agree with you.


that was an awful story, only 1 out of 3 were killed.
2014-02-10 01:13:05 PM  
1 votes:
I love a story with a happy ending.
 
Displayed 38 of 38 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report