If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WAVY Virginia)   Disgusting child pornographer caught and charged for tweeting nude pictures of innocent 16-year-old girl   (wavy.com) divider line 24
    More: Interesting, innocent, child pornography, Department of Veterans Affairs, County Police  
•       •       •

18277 clicks; posted to Main » on 08 Feb 2014 at 9:14 AM (33 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-02-08 09:44:30 AM
4 votes:
When I was a kid and we weren't busy entertaining ourselves by pushing a barrel hoop down the dirt road with a stick, a child had to would work hard to cull suitors to sate our illegal and disgusting perversions.

Toiling away for weeks on end to create and distribute tasteful intaglio etching prints and illuminated manuscripts detailing the delights of our prepubescent knobbery.  There was true artistry involved.  I personally studied under a guy who claimed to be Leonardo Da Vinci, but his techniques, which involved weeks upon end of oiled-up massage followed by months of the "say anything to anyone and your dog dies" game, left me dubious as to his actual artistic ability.  Though I must say his tutelage added a certain rueful, psychotically terrorized quality to my work, which gave it psychological depth.

Finally after creating our masterworks, we could trudge miles in the snow and sleet to area villages where we could distribute these to the Local Pedophile Council, The League of Sketchy Summer Camp Counselors, The Brotherhood of The Travelling Candy Cart, and the Guild of Touchy Uncles.

*sigh*  It was a simpler, more innocent time.
2014-02-08 09:38:10 AM
3 votes:
newsbusters.org
2014-02-08 08:55:43 AM
3 votes:
Posting a porno pic of a child can ruin their lives and do irreperable harm to them, so if they do it, we'll send them to jail and make them register as a sex offender for the rest of their lives.
2014-02-08 01:24:09 PM
2 votes:
Everyone who masturbates before the age of 18 needs to be arrested for child molestation.
2014-02-08 10:15:01 AM
2 votes:
i.telegraph.co.uk

Hai Guyz!
2014-02-08 10:10:56 AM
2 votes:

rwhamann: This is bullshiat. It dilutes the meaning of a sex crime conviction, much like tarring someone for life over public urination.


EVERYBODY LOOK AT THIS SICK PERSON, DEFENDING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND PUBLIC EXPOSURE.
2014-02-08 09:38:17 AM
2 votes:

Prey4reign: jaylectricity: It won't be long before today's sexting teens will be tomorrows lawyers and lawmakers. It's just a transitional period, much like when blacks were first allowed to ride in the front of the bus.

Because now blacks are driving the buses?


Can't get any further to the front than that.
2014-02-09 12:05:23 AM
1 votes:
Lesson learned: Don't take self nudes, kids. Stick to getting knocked up and joining the cast of 'Teen Moms'.
2014-02-08 03:47:16 PM
1 votes:

ZeroCorpse: I'm pretty sure NOBODY watched American Beauty and then turned into an ephebophile and ran around victimizing teenage girls because Thora Birch showed the world her breasts.


You were supposed to feel creeped out when she did that.  The whole point was her giving up her innocence to some drug dealer weirdo.

You didn't feel creeped out by her underage tatas?

Sicko.
2014-02-08 12:58:31 PM
1 votes:
Thanks to the NSA, the feds must have the largest collection of teen porn in the world.
2014-02-08 12:40:20 PM
1 votes:
17 years, 365 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes: You are a degenerate, perverted, maladjusted sicko deviant freak for looking at this female's nude body. You are a disgusting, demented blight on society for considering sexual thoughts about her. And she cannot understand or grasp the ramifications of or be held responsible for decisions regarding her own sexual activity.

One minute later: It's normal and accepted to lust after her and want to sex her. The woman now immediately develops all of the mental and emotional skills to handle sex and her sexuality. Game on.

Makes total sense.
2014-02-08 11:44:02 AM
1 votes:
So actresses who are under 18 years of age can appear naked in a movie (Brooke Shields, Thora Birch, Keira Knightley, Jodie Foster's sister) and as long as it's not sexual in nature (no penetration, oral contact, sexualized touching, etc.) it's perfectly legal and can be distributed nationwide without a single prosecution.

But a 16-year-old takes a naked selfie and suddenly we have to prosecute her to protect her from herself because she's a child pornographer?!  How does this make any sense?

When did we as a nation become so freaked out by naked adolescents? Nudity does not equal sex. There was no sexual assault here. There was no sexual misconduct here. What good is it going to do to treat a girl like a sex offender for something as benign as take a naked picture of herself?

I'm pretty sure NOBODY watched American Beauty and then turned into an ephebophile and ran around victimizing teenage girls because Thora Birch showed the world her breasts.

It's time the laws were changed. Nudity should be decriminalized. If there's no sex, no penetration, no blatant sexual conduct in the photo (touching, spreading, inserting, etc.) then it's just a picture of a human body. It's only sexual if you look upon with sexual desire, and that falls on the viewer; Not the subject or the photographer.

YES, protect adolescents and kids from pornography. Don't let them be the subject of pornographic imagery or video... But nudity is not pornographic.

Now, if the girl posted a photo of herself with a dildo shoved halfway in... Well, then she needs some counseling and probably needs to have her camera and social networking taken away for a while. But if it's just some topless shots? Spare the girl, stop obsessing over nudity, and spend the time and energy to prosecute real predators, like the boys in Steubenville and millions like them across the country.
2014-02-08 11:39:49 AM
1 votes:
By all means, let's ruin this dumb kid's life. The punishment is her nekkid self all over the intarwebs.
2014-02-08 11:36:40 AM
1 votes:

The One True TheDavid: From Wikipedia:

"The age of consent in Virginia is 18, with a close-in-age exception that allows teenagers aged 15 to 17 to engage in sexual acts but only with a partner younger than 18."

So she is old enough to masturbate, barely.


BTW, masturbation begins in the womb.
I'd show you the ultrasound, but that is illegal.
2014-02-08 11:11:31 AM
1 votes:

vygramul: yakmans_dad: vygramul: yakmans_dad: Nudity is not pornography.

I suggest you let the police know of your collection and see what they say about it.

There really seems to be a confusion here beyond the usual facetiousness.

Pornography demands the depiction of a sexual act. The body isn't pornographic.

(And breast feeding isn't  a sexual act. To nip that in the bud, so to speak, since that tangent is often mentioned.)

Like I said - feel free to test the system. *Parents* have lost custody of children for a month while untangling the legal hassles from having bathtub pics of their kids. If you were a stranger to the kids, I wouldn't want money riding on your staying out of jail.



I didn't believe you but a cursory Google search says that you don't want to mess with Texas. (Alhough the dates of the articles are from 2008 and 2009. Things may have changed.) But, to be fair to Texas, that prosecutor seems to be the Texas equivalent to Sherriff Joe.

So, I will amend my statement with an implicit Texas footnote. I just imagine a map where the edge of the known world is the Texas border and in the white space beyond that in 17th century script, "Here Be Assholes".
2014-02-08 10:56:10 AM
1 votes:
From Wikipedia:

"The age of consent in Virginia is 18, with a close-in-age exception that allows teenagers aged 15 to 17 to engage in sexual acts but only with a partner younger than 18."

So she is old enough to masturbate, barely.
2014-02-08 10:27:17 AM
1 votes:

MechaPyx: Back in the day we'd just take away her phone and ground her for a week or two. Sheesh.



www.lostrepublic.us
2014-02-08 10:24:47 AM
1 votes:

dangelder: "I don't think she should be charged with child pornography, because she is a child herself, but if she was 18 or older of course," said parent Emily Altman.

But if she was 18 or older of course, what? It wouldn't be child pornography then, would it?


What if her photos were two years old?
2014-02-08 10:22:21 AM
1 votes:
"I don't think she should be charged with child pornography, because she is a child herself, but if she was 18 or older of course," said parent Emily Altman.

But if she was 18 or older of course, what? It wouldn't be child pornography then, would it?
2014-02-08 10:03:56 AM
1 votes:

markfara: So nudity = pornography and a 16-year-old is a "child"? Really?

We've really gone overboard on this sh*t. Jesus. . . .


She HAS to be prosecuted though.  You know, For The ChildrenTM!

.....wait.....
2014-02-08 09:44:07 AM
1 votes:
This is a perfect situation for them to make what I consider to be the bullshiat legal Daily Double.

Let us see if they:
A) do decide to prosecute her for child pornography and
B) decide to try her as an adult.

That would just make my farking year, and it is only February.
2014-02-08 09:30:09 AM
1 votes:
Why shouldn't she be branded for life, having to register every move with the authorities, just because she made a stupid decision as a teenager? I mean, you guys are acting like that is a disproportionate response to her actions, or something.
2014-02-08 09:25:20 AM
1 votes:

AngryDragon: "A school resource officer was notified, and spoke with the teen and her mother. "

The schools have officially gone full retard.  WTF?


Not just the schools, the idiot who decided they needed to notify the school resource officer is also retarded.  Just rub one out, talk behind her back, and call it a day.  That's the end of it.
2014-02-08 09:01:59 AM
1 votes:
It won't be long before today's sexting teens will be tomorrows lawyers and lawmakers. It's just a transitional period, much like when blacks were first allowed to ride in the front of the bus.
 
Displayed 24 of 24 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report