Spad31: log_jammin: Spad31: This is rapidly getting stupid.it was stupid at 2014-02-08 05:48:52 AMIt was stupid when you defended adultery and dishonesty because of political orientation.
walktoanarcade: it would mean co-presidents,
NeverDrunk23: RyogaM: dumbobruni: Newt GingrichRan for the Republican nominee last election cycle, coming very close to winning, and not a peep regarding his infidelities was heard. Amazing how that happens, huh?Hey, Newt just loves marriage so much that he just couldn't settle for one or two.
dumbobruni: Newt Gingrich
walktoanarcade: HighOnCraic: walktoanarcade: HighOnCraic: walktoanarcade: OK, sorry to be an bastard to you, but c'mon...I was there.That's me because I accidentally corrected "an asshole" to "an bastard" owing to a typo?I see. The classic, if you make one error, you've erred in everything.Oh, come on. I'm mostly here to make jokes.Oh! Jokes...oh. hahahaahahahaAhem: the leopard sees his spots, I say again, the leopard sees his spots and does not feel frisky. NOT FRISKY.:)
liam76: cameroncrazy1984: liam76: So, to make sure we are on the same page, since I can't "come up with a rule" you are arguing, the only "rule" against jerking off at the office for federal employees is "public masturbation" and that BJ's from interns in the office is not a fireable offense for federal employees.Nope, I am not even arguing there's a rule. I'm arguing that you can't come up with a citation for your claim that Bill Clinton tightened such rules that apparently you say just exist in the ether.Then why were you asking for the rule?Go ahead and show me those rules, please. Section and paragraph. :
quatchi: HighOnCraic: Re-certify yourselfThat's copyright infringement, innit? Someone call the Police! :>D
HighOnCraic: Re-certify yourself
walktoanarcade: cameroncrazy1984: walktoanarcade: HighOnCraic:Did Clinton borrow Obama's time machine to start the negotiations?Are you going to ignore the fact that I proved you wrong? Are you going to also ignore the fact that President Bill Clinton did indeed sign NAFTA into law?You pretended it NAFTA was all on Clinton. It obviously was not. You have also not demonstrated how NAFTA moved manufacturing jobs to India and China.I never said it was all on him; I said Clinton signed it. They're all guilty as I have been saying all along, but you keep on ignoring, all along. ;)I'm going to g'bye to you for now.
quatchi: HighOnCraic: quatchi: RAND PAUL running on the "no moar political dynasties" ticket.It's not as crazy as his "ban fake certification boards" plan.Lawls.You. You I like./RAND PAUL. Not just certifiable. He's self-certifiable!
walktoanarcade: whidbey: walktoanarcade:You can't think of one single personI don't see you telling us who the GOP's secret weapon is.What am I, governor Tarkin now? ;)
2013-11-26 10:57:57 (10 weeks ago)
cameroncrazy1984: grumpfuff: So then you would have to advocate for no spouse or family member or close friend or anyone who could have had any possible influence on a president to be unable to run.Because anything short of that is pure hypocrisyI guess Jeb Bush is out, because that would make W violate the 22nd Amendment!
walktoanarcade: cameroncrazy1984: walktoanarcade: You know I never said anything even approaching thatIf you didn't, then why did you say they would be "going against the 22nd Amendment"? By implication that would mean that Bill would be the de facto President with Hillary putting no input into any of the decisions.That's not quite it. The amendment was to prevent this very instance. Use your brains, it's to keep out the dynasties you want so badly, and yes, it would mean Bill would be acting as President with the inevitable abuse of power he would achieve in small abuses, but Hillary would of course be President with all the final say. This is not the same as "Bill would be president because wimmin hayte derrrrrp"You want to enable political dynasties for when it's your "team." I don't have a horse in this race, but I know you do.Not you nor I would be peachy-keen with George W. Bush back in the WH in any shape or form. You cannot trust them.
walktoanarcade: You're probably right as I would more likely for for a pile of dog doo before any of them(or her).
Spad31: Let's not pretend his troubles weren't about "getting a hummer in the oval Office", but rather, committing perjury to a Grand Jury when testifying about it. A fact conveniently left out in discussions around here.So, yes, Clinton IS an ass hole.
Spad31: Let's not pretend his troubles weren't about "getting a hummer in the oval Office", but rather, committing perjury to a Grand Jury when testifying about it.BMulligan: "Upon a point material to a legal inquiry." Questions regarding Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky were immaterial to the action in which he was being deposed.
Spad31: Yippy for you. He lied. Publicly. Period. Get to your point.
walktoanarcade: Of course some of us should love the Clintons! Afterall, Bill signed NAFTA and screwed over American manufacturing forever, and if they didn't do that, there would be a whole lot less coffee slingers to condescend to us while we get our brews in a desperate attempt to communicate that somehow they're not failures.
oryx: Because Bill Clinton was an asshole, Hillary Clinton his enabler, and she wants to be president and so does Rand Paul.
RyogaM: dumbobruni: Newt GingrichRan for the Republican nominee last election cycle, coming very close to winning, and not a peep regarding his infidelities was heard. Amazing how that happens, huh?
Bigdogdaddy: Anyone notice that republicans Libertarians go off on a rant so easily? This is why I am no longer a Libertarian, the bat shiat crazies have taken over it too.
Trailltrader: Vince Fosters ...Arkansas...Benghazi...quasi-repetillian female
Descartes: Did he cheat on his wife? Sure. But he did a decent job as President. I think calling him an asshole is just silly.
Spad31: This is rapidly getting stupid.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Apr 23 2017 19:51:45
Runtime: 0.488 sec (487 ms)