If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Post)   Why does Rand Paul keep attacking Bill Clinton? Because he's an asshole, that's why   (washingtonpost.com) divider line 417
    More: Obvious, Rand Paul, Bill Clinton, Kentucky Senators, C-SPAN  
•       •       •

2855 clicks; posted to Politics » on 08 Feb 2014 at 9:11 AM (22 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



417 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-02-08 10:51:17 PM

Animatronik: bigpeeler: Which one is the asshole?

And I didn't need to read the rest of the thread. You can't treat women as equals unless you treat them with respect.If all women were clones of Janet Reno, Clinton would have been the most respectful pres in history....


www.ada.gov
you don't think she has kind of a more matured Rachel Maddow vibe going?
 
2014-02-08 10:53:16 PM

walktoanarcade: Fart_Machine: walktoanarcade: Do you honestly believe that Bill would stand by and not exercise some power and authority over which he no longer has a right?

He already has some power being an ex-President with a lot of pull within the Democratic Party.  But yeah, let's focus on something that happened 16 years ago.  That's a winner!

That's how you refer to the possibility of the Clinton's making a mockery of the 22 Amendment?  Wow.

You would be all right with Laura Bush becoming president with "Dubya" inside the WH again, then, right? Right? ;)


This is the most stupid line of reasoning I've read all week.  And as much time as I spend in the comments on the Poliitcs tab, that is saying something. You, sir, are a piece of work.
 
2014-02-08 11:28:49 PM

liam76: cameroncrazy1984: Look, my point is,  liam76, that you can't just claim that rules "just exist and aren't written down specifically"

The fact that you are being so dick in the toaster stupid, so blatantly dishonest, or so fundamentally ignorant how the federal govt or any big govt works is a laughable.

The fact that you were given a clear example of how stupid your claim about needing specific rule, after the jerking off claim, and still pretend you need a rule "written down specifically" shows you aren't interested in an honest conversation.

cameroncrazy1984: and then try to claim specifically that Clinton "tightened up" said rules

This makes it very clear.

I never said "tightened up".


My first statement. -He oversaw a lot of progress on sexual harassment int he workplace.

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment-a.c f m

In his first term the EEOC doubled the number of resolutions, and more than doubled the amount of monetary benefits (and that was before they resorted to lawsuits).


cameroncrazy1984: Are you going to show us the rule that Clinton supposedly advocated for and tightened up, making him thus a "hypocrite" according to you? Or not

No, stupid, I can't find a rule that specifically says don't get oral sex from interns in the office.

Just like I can't find a rule that specifically says, don't jerk off in the office, or don't shiat in the office.


If you can't find those specific rules, how can you say that Clinton tightened them? You don't even seem to know what they are!
 
2014-02-08 11:30:25 PM
Last I checked it was a consensual relationship among two adults.  It wasn't "rape", "rape rape", "legitimate rape", or "illegitimate rape".  Democrats are not against casual consensual sex, that is the GOP.  It was adultery but Democrats are not the party which runs as the party of morality.  So while bad judgement it wasn't a "women's rights" issue.
 
2014-02-08 11:30:45 PM

Animatronik: bigpeeler: Which one is the asshole?

And I didn't need to read the rest of the thread. You can't treat women as equals unless you treat them with respect.If all women were clones of Janet Reno, Clinton would have been the most respectful pres in history....


You have never seen a picture of Monica Lewinsky, have you.
 
2014-02-08 11:40:31 PM

liam76: cameroncrazy1984: Look, my point is,  liam76, that you can't just claim that rules "just exist and aren't written down specifically"

The fact that you are being so dick in the toaster stupid, so blatantly dishonest, or so fundamentally ignorant how the federal govt or any big govt works is a laughable.

The fact that you were given a clear example of how stupid your claim about needing specific rule, after the jerking off claim, and still pretend you need a rule "written down specifically" shows you aren't interested in an honest conversation.

cameroncrazy1984: and then try to claim specifically that Clinton "tightened up" said rules

This makes it very clear.

I never said "tightened up".


My first statement. -He oversaw a lot of progress on sexual harassment int he workplace.

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment-a.c f m

In his first term the EEOC doubled the number of resolutions, and more than doubled the amount of monetary benefits (and that was before they resorted to lawsuits).


cameroncrazy1984: Are you going to show us the rule that Clinton supposedly advocated for and tightened up, making him thus a "hypocrite" according to you? Or not

No, stupid, I can't find a rule that specifically says don't get oral sex from interns in the office.

Just like I can't find a rule that specifically says, don't jerk off in the office, or don't shiat in the office.


I think you're slightly off the mark on what you're being asked for.
(I'm just gonna jump in here, because why the hell not?)

You said Clinton tightened/increased rules and regulations regarding sexual harassment while getting a blowjob from an intern in the Oval Office, and that doing so made him a hypocrite. Your post mentions the EEOC but it seems that you're being asked for a citation that reflects Clinton's involvement in the alleged tightening/restricting.
Was there an Executive Order? Was there a memo sent to a Cabinet member? What about a directive to the DOJ? Was it spoken of in a policy speech? I doubt you're being asked to provide a link to a rule that specifically says not to have sexy time fun at work. No one needs to be shown where that's spelled out in black and white.

/personally, I was less upset by Clinton getting it on in the Oval Office than I was with him getting caught. You're the farking President. How about a little discretion for shiat's sake.
 
2014-02-08 11:42:23 PM

Animatronik: bigpeeler: Which one is the asshole?

And I didn't need to read the rest of the thread. You can't treat women as equals unless you treat them with respect.If all women were clones of Janet Reno, Clinton would have been the most respectful pres in history....


So how was a consensual, if adulterous, sex act disrespecting women as a group?

/Don't bother, I know the answer is 'Because we can use that claim to deflect criticism when a Republican says something obscenely sexist'.
 
2014-02-09 12:34:24 AM

Gyrfalcon: How is an event which happened to a man who was president TWO ADMINISTRATIONS ago, which he was actually impeached (though not tried) for,  and which stopped being newsworthy when the Starr Report failed to unearth any other evidence of wrongdoing by said former president suddenly newsworthy again?


Because the whole of the Democratic party fawned and continues to fawn over a man who consistently used his position of power to coerce sexual favors out of young women who worked around him.  The national media then attacked the accusers and if I remember James Carville was quotes as joking that "they must have drug a $100 bill through a trailer park."

the NOW never spoke out against Clinton. Gloria Allred never defended Kathleen Willy or Juanita Broadderick.  Essentially, rape, misogyny, misconduct in the workplace and vehicular manslaughter are ok for Democrat politicians so long as they defend pro-abortion bills.

 

heavymetal: Last I checked it was a consensual relationship among two adults.  It wasn't "rape", "rape rape", "legitimate rape", or "illegitimate rape".


And a relationship between a professor and college student is two consenting adults, or a doctor and patient, attorney and client.  However any normal person should agree that such relationships are inappropriate.  You'll actually find many feminists who would argue that a man in a position of authority who has sex with someone within his organization is committing some form or rape even if the sex wasn't forced.   If course, that definition of rape changes if the person happens to be a prominent left-leaning lawmaker.
 
2014-02-09 12:34:52 AM

HighOnCraic: walktoanarcade: OK, sorry to be an bastard to you, but c'mon...I was there.

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 640x905]


Urge to kill rising... rising...
 
2014-02-09 01:23:10 AM

o5iiawah: Because the whole of the Democratic party fawned and continues to fawn over a man who consistently used his position of power to coerce sexual favors out of young women who worked around him.  The national media then attacked the accusers and if I remember James Carville was quotes as joking that "they must have drug a $100 bill through a trailer park."

the NOW never spoke out against Clinton. Gloria Allred never defended Kathleen Willy or Juanita Broadderick.  Essentially, rape, misogyny, misconduct in the workplace and vehicular manslaughter are ok for Democrat politicians so long as they defend pro-abortion bills.


no.

It's because they can't attack what he says and prove him wrong using facts.

That's all there is to it.
 
2014-02-09 01:39:05 AM

geek_mars: /personally, I was less upset by Clinton getting it on in the Oval Office than I was with him getting caught. You're the farking President. How about a little discretion for shiat's sake.


Well, there's this.

And his women all look like fat mares with glanders. Goddamn, you'd think a guy called Slick Willie could score some nicer looking mares.
 
2014-02-09 01:46:57 AM

Gyrfalcon: geek_mars: /personally, I was less upset by Clinton getting it on in the Oval Office than I was with him getting caught. You're the farking President. How about a little discretion for shiat's sake.

Well, there's this.

And his women all look like fat mares with glanders. Goddamn, you'd think a guy called Slick Willie could score some nicer looking mares.


Well, everyone's tastes are different. His mother said he always went for the buxom, southern belle types and it stunned her when her son brought home this skinny, nerdy bookworm and said he intended to marry her.
 
2014-02-09 02:02:32 AM

bigpeeler: Which one is the asshole?


Obviously the Rand one. Couple insanity with a dame who, despite her attack on a safety net, died on the dole for her largesse. Ayn Rand, HYPOCRITE, Rand Paul, confederate opportunist...
 
2014-02-09 02:04:32 AM

o5iiawah: And a relationship between a professor and college student is two consenting adults, or a doctor and patient, attorney and client. However any normal person should agree that such relationships are inappropriate. You'll actually find many feminists who would argue that a man in a position of authority who has sex with someone within his organization is committing some form or rape even if the sex wasn't forced. If course, that definition of rape changes if the person happens to be a prominent left-leaning lawmaker.


So it wasn't rape by any definition except the strawman you created.  Well OK then.
 
2014-02-09 02:25:26 AM
RAND PAUL is attacking Bill because he's scared shiatless of having to run against Hillary in 2016.
 
2014-02-09 02:27:39 AM

Trailltrader: Rand Paul keeps attacking Bill Clinton because Bill Clinton is a lying pile of poo.  Where do you want to start?  Vince Fosters suicide with the gun found in his right hand and he's left handed?  All the shady land deals made in Arkansas?  Benghazi?  The number of women Bill Clinton has had sex with that he was dishonest with- and this guy had the authority to start WW III?

Or how about the double standards where that REPUBLICAN senator in Oregon was forced to resign, but when Bill Clinton sexually harassed a young girl all you heard was the sound of,,,,,,silence,,,,,,,from the National Organization of Women?  Where was the outrage?  ***sounds of crickets, tumbleweeds and wind***

Chelsea Clinton's father is actually Janet Reno- you can tell just by looking at her, and I'd be a 6 pack of beer (I'll pay you back, Drew) that DNA would show the truth.

Rand Paul is a hero for doing what he can to keep that quasi-repetillian female from ruining the country.


ooooh, troll thread!
 
2014-02-09 02:38:17 AM

Spad31: log_jammin: Spad31: This is rapidly getting stupid.

it was stupid at  2014-02-08 05:48:52 AM

It was stupid when you defended adultery and dishonesty because of political orientation.


Have any GOPers committed serious offenses or is it just the Dem?
 
2014-02-09 02:40:10 AM

bindlestiff2600: because lieing about a bJ

is exactly the same as lieing to start a war

/at least 24% of the population thinks so anyway


Bush junior committed a war crime when he ordered the invasion of Iraq.
 
2014-02-09 02:46:59 AM

notyoucoach: pjbreeze: Rand Paul keeps attacking Bill Clinton because he's jealous of him.  The wank couldn't get a hummer at work if he tried.

I'm sure there are many of his young staffers eager to hum him. Of course 99.9% are male, NTTAWWT.


Does that include the Southern Avenger?
 
2014-02-09 03:04:38 AM

walktoanarcade: Fart_Machine: cameroncrazy1984: How would electing Hillary Clinton (a competent person and coincidentally a completely separate person from her husband) go against the 22nd amendment?

Because electing the wife means you're really getting the husband making the decisions.  You really do have to have been alive in the 1940's to believe this argument.

One would have to be a super-deluxe damned fool idiot with severe mental deficiencies to believe that Bill Clinton would not abuse his position as "first gentleman."


I suspect that he would spend most of his time chasing skirts and at his age it's likely he won't be able to catch many.
 
2014-02-09 04:00:41 AM

Gyrfalcon: And his women all look like fat mares with glanders. Goddamn, you'd think a guy called Slick Willie could score some nicer looking mares.


He's the president.  He doesn't  need to pick affairs that other men find attractive to elevate his social status through perceived competition.  He's already one of 102 people in the entire nation that actually get a farking  title that's used to address them even off the job.

Basically, the entire motivation set that you have for picking women that look good photographed from five feet away in a push-up bra doing a pose over the ones that give good head doesn't apply to him.
 
2014-02-09 04:06:08 AM

Descartes: Did he cheat on his wife?  Sure.  But he did a decent job as President.


Yeah. That housing bubble was AWESOME!!! And don't forget about squashing all attempts to regulate the derivatives market.
 
2014-02-09 04:13:44 AM

o5iiawah: Because the whole of the Democratic party fawned and continues to fawn over a man who consistently used his position of power to coerce sexual favors out of young women who worked around him.


Dude, Clinton isn't going to fark you.
 
2014-02-09 07:40:34 AM

lordjupiter: Can you at least TRY? This is boring. You're boring. Stop boring people


If you think discussions about the ethics of Bill Clinton's actions are boring, why the fark are you posting in a thread about comments said about Bill Clinton?


cameroncrazy1984: If you can't find those specific rules, how can you say that Clinton tightened them? You don't even seem to know what they are


I have mentioned this multiple times.

No I can't find those specific rules, just as I can't find specific rules about shiatting on your desk or jerking off at your desk.

If you re dumb enough to think those things are A-ok without specific rules, you are just pain stupid


I cna say clinton tightened them because under his administration the EEOC doubled the number of resolutions, and more than doubled the amount of monetary benefits for sexual harrassment claims.


geek_mars: You said Clinton tightened/increased rules and regulations regarding sexual harassment while getting a blowjob from an intern in the Oval Office, and that doing so made him a hypocrite. Your post mentions the EEOC but it seems that you're being asked for a citation that reflects Clinton's involvement in the alleged tightening/restricting.


When a federal agency doubles the number actions they take for specific behavior that is clear evidence for me that the president in question incresed enforcement on that behavior. When the enforcement on those rules doubles it is clear the president is pushing for those rules to be enforced (unless you think sexual harassment doubles for some other reason).

geek_mars: I doubt you're being asked to provide a link to a rule that specifically says not to have sexy time fun at work


See the above.

cameroncrazy1984, and a number of other tards have asked for specific rules that prohibit getting BJ's from interns at the office.
 
2014-02-09 09:08:04 AM

log_jammin: no.

It's because they can't attack what he says and prove him wrong using facts.

That's all there is to it.


saying 'No' doesn't make your argument.
Bill Clinton by all accounts is a serial misogynist which is okay to democrats because he raises a butt-ton of money

Fart_Machine: So it wasn't rape by any definition except the strawman you created.  Well OK then.


I didn't create a strawman. I'm trying to get to the bottom of why Democrats dont seem to care that Bill Clinton as a man has a track record of sexual conduct with women in and around his professional circle.

As a reasonable and normal society, we look down on doctor/patient, student/teacher, attorney/client and employer/employee relationships so tell me where Clinton's is different.

By the way, you have no idea of what a strawman actually is.  Go play in traffic and make the world smarter.
 
2014-02-09 09:44:36 AM

o5iiawah: Bill Clinton by all accounts is a serial misogynist which is okay to democrats because he raises a butt-ton of money


STOP ACTING LIKE MONICA NEVER SAID SHE WAS GOING TO THE WHITE HOUSE TO GET HER "PRESIDENTIAL KNEE PADS"
 
2014-02-09 10:07:55 AM

jjorsett: He's attacking the Democratic Party for talking up the, "We're for women" line while continually protecting and defending that POS who's the exact opposite of what they supposedly stand for.


Yes, a consensually given BJ is a billionty times worse than requiring inanimate objects be shoved up a woman's vag before the small government the GOP loves so much deigns to *permit* her to consider an abortion. It's also just as bad as slut shaming women who use birth control, and trying to keep it legal for insurers to discriminate against women for health care coverage. Oh, and it's also just as bad as trying to kill bills that protect domestic abuse victims or introducing language into bills to clarify that certain types of rape aren't really rape. Yep, just as bad.
 
2014-02-09 11:19:16 AM

o5iiawah: log_jammin: no.

It's because they can't attack what he says and prove him wrong using facts.

That's all there is to it.

saying 'No' doesn't make your argument.
Bill Clinton by all accounts is a serial misogynist which is okay to democrats because he raises a butt-ton of money

Fart_Machine: So it wasn't rape by any definition except the strawman you created.  Well OK then.

I didn't create a strawman. I'm trying to get to the bottom of why Democrats dont seem to care that Bill Clinton as a man has a track record of sexual conduct with women in and around his professional circle.

As a reasonable and normal society, we look down on doctor/patient, student/teacher, attorney/client and employer/employee relationships so tell me where Clinton's is different.

By the way, you have no idea of what a strawman actually is.  Go play in traffic and make the world smarter.


No you're creating a false argument that Clinton "raped" Lewinski based on feminists that exist in your empty head. Looking down on something isn't the same as claiming rape. Is it a hobby of yours to sound stupid in every Fark thread or are you a full-time idiot?
 
2014-02-09 11:27:44 AM

grumpfuff: o5iiawah: Bill Clinton by all accounts is a serial misogynist which is okay to democrats because he raises a butt-ton of money

STOP ACTING LIKE MONICA NEVER SAID SHE WAS GOING TO THE WHITE HOUSE TO GET HER "PRESIDENTIAL KNEE PADS"


I vaguely remember hearing that in the 90's, but thought it was a rumor.
 
2014-02-09 11:49:57 AM

liam76: grumpfuff: o5iiawah: Bill Clinton by all accounts is a serial misogynist which is okay to democrats because he raises a butt-ton of money

STOP ACTING LIKE MONICA NEVER SAID SHE WAS GOING TO THE WHITE HOUSE TO GET HER "PRESIDENTIAL KNEE PADS"

I vaguely remember hearing that in the 90's, but thought it was a rumor.


They wouldn't let the New York Daily News print it it wasn't true, right?

/I thought it was an admission by Monica to her BFF Linda Tripp, but that's wrong
 
2014-02-09 12:09:26 PM

liam76: grumpfuff: o5iiawah: Bill Clinton by all accounts is a serial misogynist which is okay to democrats because he raises a butt-ton of money

STOP ACTING LIKE MONICA NEVER SAID SHE WAS GOING TO THE WHITE HOUSE TO GET HER "PRESIDENTIAL KNEE PADS"

I vaguely remember hearing that in the 90's, but thought it was a rumor.


I read that it showed up in a transcript somewhere. I guess I could be wrong.
 
2014-02-09 12:39:43 PM
You know, I wonder if this will not backfire a bit more on the Republicans than they'll think.  This whole attack is based on the belief that women can't be sexually aggressive, enjoy sex, seek sex, etc etc.  Any sexual contact between a man and a woman is because the man wants it.

Are they also taking the claim that some feminists also advance that all male on female sex is rape?
 
2014-02-09 01:02:12 PM

DrPainMD: Descartes: Did he cheat on his wife?  Sure.  But he did a decent job as President.

Yeah. That housing bubble was AWESOME!!! And don't forget about squashing all attempts to regulate the derivatives market.


So, he failed to control capitalism enough?

Still far better than any other options available at that time.

Just as Obama is now.
 
2014-02-09 01:44:32 PM

liam76: I have mentioned this multiple times.

No I can't find those specific rules, just as I can't find specific rules about shiatting on your desk or jerking off at your desk.

If you re dumb enough to think those things are A-ok without specific rules, you are just pain stupid


Well then seriously how can you claim that they were "tightened" under Clinton if you can't find any specific rules for it? Also you can't even find any instances of executives being fired for consensual relationships as an example of said rule-tightening. Your proof is literally "because I said so!"
 
2014-02-09 02:55:24 PM

o5iiawah: I didn't create a strawman. I'm trying to get to the bottom of why Democrats dont seem to care that Bill Clinton as a man has a track record of sexual conduct with women in and around his professional circle.


Of course you did.

Only butthurt right wingers even care about Clinton. Most of us realize that the Lewinsky affair and all the other "gotcha" affairs (many of which didn't happen) (mad?) was a witch hunt.

So you keep chasing those witches. Maybe you'll meet the ghost of McCarthy along the way and you two can have a drink somewhere and lament the loss of America.
 
2014-02-09 03:06:49 PM

cameroncrazy1984: liam76: I have mentioned this multiple times.

No I can't find those specific rules, just as I can't find specific rules about shiatting on your desk or jerking off at your desk.

If you re dumb enough to think those things are A-ok without specific rules, you are just pain stupid

Well then seriously how can you claim that they were "tightened" under Clinton if you can't find any specific rules for it? Also you can't even find any instances of executives being fired for consensual relationships as an example of said rule-tightening. Your proof is literally "because I said so!"


i.imgur.com
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ1/content-detail.html

/meme is not an admission of motivation, but a prediction of how it'll be taken
 
2014-02-09 03:08:55 PM
I love how this thread should have been dead hours ago, but there's just that much more butthurt over Clinton to be had. Notice the lack of any actual condemnation for (either) Paul, but Bill sure rustles your jimmies, doesn't he?
 
2014-02-09 03:11:46 PM

Vlad_the_Inaner: cameroncrazy1984: liam76: I have mentioned this multiple times.

No I can't find those specific rules, just as I can't find specific rules about shiatting on your desk or jerking off at your desk.

If you re dumb enough to think those things are A-ok without specific rules, you are just pain stupid

Well then seriously how can you claim that they were "tightened" under Clinton if you can't find any specific rules for it? Also you can't even find any instances of executives being fired for consensual relationships as an example of said rule-tightening. Your proof is literally "because I said so!"

[i.imgur.com image 686x1214]
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ1/content-detail.html

/meme is not an admission of motivation, but a prediction of how it'll be taken


Interestingly that law appears to apply to Congress only. And covers a wide variety of issues.
 
2014-02-09 03:45:07 PM

Satanic_Hamster: liam76: That is funny, I have you tagged, as "idiot, cries trool when confused.

Trool?


Cry Trool!, and let slip the doogs of war.
 
2014-02-09 03:54:41 PM

cameroncrazy1984: Interestingly that law appears to apply to Congress only. And covers a wide variety of issues.


You would have to ask the author, but at a guess it's part of a show to cancel out the perception that 'Congress always exempts itself from regulations' that is commonly held.

In which case, the implication is that other branches of the government were already covered before the bill.
 
2014-02-09 04:56:30 PM

liam76: grumpfuff: o5iiawah: Bill Clinton by all accounts is a serial misogynist which is okay to democrats because he raises a butt-ton of money

STOP ACTING LIKE MONICA NEVER SAID SHE WAS GOING TO THE WHITE HOUSE TO GET HER "PRESIDENTIAL KNEE PADS"

I vaguely remember hearing that in the 90's, but thought it was a rumor.



Well, not sure about the "knee pads" line, but:

She was standing with her back to the office door, and when he returned, she put her hands on her hips and with her thumbs lifted the back of her jacket, allowing him a fleeting glimpse of her thong underwear.
She told him she had this vision of them together as 'Little Bill and Little Monica,' walking hand-in-hand in the sunlight.
Monica: "People have made it seem so demeaning for me, but it wasn't, it was exciting, and the irony is that I had the first orgasm of the relationship."

http://jezebel.com/5962809/we-read-monica-lewinskys-authorized-1999- bi ography-so-you-dont-have-to

/This thread has been dead for a while, but for what it's worth, getting a consensual blowjob from a coworker at the office is probably a solid reason for getting fired (and such rules were probably in place long before Clinton was in office).
 
2014-02-09 05:08:00 PM

HighOnCraic: This thread has been dead for a while, but for what it's worth


I don't think so. How dare us liberals worship that sex predator? This outrage must continue, as it pulls away at the very fabric of our liberalism.
 
2014-02-09 05:17:16 PM

Vlad_the_Inaner: In which case, the implication is that other branches of the government were already covered before the bill.


There is no implication of anything.  This was part of the Republican's Contract With America.
 
2014-02-09 05:24:13 PM

whidbey: HighOnCraic: This thread has been dead for a while, but for what it's worth

I don't think so. How dare us liberals worship that sex predator? This outrage must continue, as it pulls away at the very fabric of our liberalism.


Meh.  I voted for Clinton twice, because I thought he'd do a better job than Bush or Dole.  I still think he displayed horrible judgment--he knew the Republicans were looking hard at his personal life.
 
2014-02-09 05:50:02 PM

Vlad_the_Inaner: liam76: grumpfuff: o5iiawah: Bill Clinton by all accounts is a serial misogynist which is okay to democrats because he raises a butt-ton of money

STOP ACTING LIKE MONICA NEVER SAID SHE WAS GOING TO THE WHITE HOUSE TO GET HER "PRESIDENTIAL KNEE PADS"

I vaguely remember hearing that in the 90's, but thought it was a rumor.


They wouldn't let the New York Daily News print it it wasn't true, right?

/I thought it was an admission by Monica to her BFF Linda Tripp, but that's wrong


Well who was it then?

*click*

Her former High School teacher who she had an affair with for 5 years after graduating?

Wow, that girl has more issues than Reader's Digest, I swear.

Not just any teacher but her Drama teacher?

How very appropriate.
 
2014-02-09 05:50:05 PM

cameroncrazy1984: liam76: I have mentioned this multiple times.

No I can't find those specific rules, just as I can't find specific rules about shiatting on your desk or jerking off at your desk.

If you re dumb enough to think those things are A-ok without specific rules, you are just pain stupid

Well then seriously how can you claim that they were "tightened" under Clinton if you can't find any specific rules for it? Also you can't even find any instances of executives being fired for consensual relationships as an example of said rule-tightening. Your proof is literally "because I said so!"



I have already proven what the EEOC did under Clinton with regards to sexual harassment. My proof is the stats that I linked, and you ignored of the amount of cases they won money and got resolutions for doubling under his first term.


The fact that you are still pretending you need a specific rule about BJ's is laughably pathetic.


Please keep doing that. Keep pretending that since there is no specific rule about BJ's written in federal the federal code that it is A-ok and Clinton did nothing with regards to working against sexual harassment in the workplace, despite the EEOC numbers.
 
2014-02-09 06:22:06 PM

rnld: Vlad_the_Inaner: In which case, the implication is that other branches of the government were already covered before the bill.

There is no implication of anything.  This was part of the Republican's Contract With America.


you mean the part that said

"1. require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply to Congress;"

Thanks for playing.

/or maybe you don't include the other branches of government in "the rest of the country"
 
2014-02-09 06:28:09 PM

liam76: My proof is the stats that I linked


Do you live in an alternate universe where you actually linked to other websites besides fark that the rest of us normal humans can't experience? Because the only links you've posted in this thread were to other fark comments.
 
2014-02-09 06:45:25 PM

liam76: Please keep doing that. Keep pretending that since there is no specific rule about BJ's written in federal the federal code that it is A-ok and Clinton did nothing with regards to working against sexual harassment in the workplace, despite the EEOC numbers.


Dude you and Ken Starr should have coffee sometime. He'd be so pleased to hear that his turd in the punchbowl still gets so much traction these days.
 
2014-02-09 06:55:49 PM

mgshamster: Do you live in an alternate universe where you actually linked to other websites besides fark that the rest of us normal humans can't experience? Because the only links you've posted in this thread were to other fark comments



Ok, dum dum.

liam76: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment-a.c f m


whidbey: Dude you and Ken Starr should have coffee sometime. He'd be so pleased to hear that his turd in the punchbowl still gets so much traction these days


Yeah, a lot of traction.

All that being said he was a pretty good pres.
 
Displayed 50 of 417 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report