Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Slashdot)   Since when was Slashdot a Fark Beta site? Since Dice started redirecting 25% of its users to a failed site redesign   (meta.slashdot.org) divider line 102
    More: Fail, Slashdot a Fark Beta, web designers  
•       •       •

4115 clicks; posted to Geek » on 07 Feb 2014 at 9:47 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



102 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-02-07 09:48:29 AM  
You'll get over it.
 
2014-02-07 09:50:02 AM  
Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.
 
2014-02-07 09:53:34 AM  
Little Boy Blew . . OH!

/dnrtfa
 
Zel [TotalFark]
2014-02-07 09:56:06 AM  

Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.


Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.
 
2014-02-07 09:59:59 AM  
Netcraft confirms: Slashdot is dying.

/hot grits
 
2014-02-07 10:00:46 AM  
They're pissed as hell. Every story is filled with comments that say they'll boycott. But this is Microsoft working behind the scenes to stamp out a respected site for daring to crap on their tyranny over open source and whatnot. Can't have that.
 
2014-02-07 10:08:24 AM  
So they hate it because it's easy on the eyes and comments section is not a clusterfark?
 
2014-02-07 10:21:05 AM  

Zel: Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.

Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.


Slashdot links have digressed to three major genres:  "Everyone should go into Computer Science, except women!" Click bait, "No one should ever pay for software, as an over paid developer I see no downsides to this cunning plan!" type keyboard hippieism or press releases for products and unsustainable SanFran start-ups thinly veiled as news.
 
2014-02-07 10:36:21 AM  
Did they ge...

OrionXVI: You'll get over it.


Well shiat.
 
2014-02-07 10:46:01 AM  

BumpInTheNight: Zel: Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.

Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.

Slashdot links have digressed to three major genres:  "Everyone should go into Computer Science, except women!" Click bait, "No one should ever pay for software, as an over paid developer I see no downsides to this cunning plan!" type keyboard hippieism or press releases for products and unsustainable SanFran start-ups thinly veiled as news.


So, basically Fark but stupider? At least fark has flavors of crap with nuts, or corn, or sometimes pretty color!
 
2014-02-07 10:49:42 AM  
slashdot is shiat anyway. how could anyone tell it was broken?
 
2014-02-07 10:53:38 AM  

BumpInTheNight: Zel: Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.

Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.

Slashdot links have digressed to three major genres:  "Everyone should go into Computer Science, except women!" Click bait, "No one should ever pay for software, as an over paid developer I see no downsides to this cunning plan!" type keyboard hippieism or press releases for products and unsustainable SanFran start-ups thinly veiled as news.


Don't forget about the 9,132 open-source project announcements per day, followed the next day by 9,133 project abandonment announcements.
 
2014-02-07 11:04:55 AM  
Interesting. There's no option to have hot grits poured on you or a naked and petrified Natalie Portman.

From Soviet Russia, of course.

croesius: Did they ge...

OrionXVI: You'll get over it.

Well shiat.


Slashdot readers never get over anything. Ever.
 
2014-02-07 11:08:02 AM  

Zel: Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.

Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.


Fark's present design burns about 2" of space on the right column, but the slashdot beta sidebar is almost the entire width of the comments. When comments are nested, the blank sidebar is wider than the comments. Two trivial things that would enhance readability would be to rein in the really wide inter-line spacing and ditch the grey-on-grey color scheme for a more legible black-on-white.

To me, it looks like a mishmash of the trendy UX antipatterns that look great as Photoshop mockups, but are actually detriments to readability: the use of floating bars on the top that break the use of PageUp/PageDown/spacebar for scrolling, the infinite scroll antipattern that makes it difficult to load all comments in a long thread. Replacement of accurate timestamps with vague approximations so it's impossible to tell who's original and who's plagiarizing, etc. Grey-on-grey.

They seem to be making the same mistake Windows 8 (or Digg v4) made: a UX revamp is widely protested by the userbase for months, most feedback is ignored, and despite everyone being aware of the predictable result, nobody in house is willing to admit that the emperor has no clothes. Office politics has its own momentum, and so the owners drive it off the cliff anyways.
 
2014-02-07 11:11:27 AM  
The Slashdot comment moderation system sucks like a million paper cuts.
 
2014-02-07 11:14:06 AM  

styckx: So they hate it because it's easy on the eyes and comments section is not a clusterfark?


The comments section is the only good thing about the old design. Yeah, it's ugly. But the threaded conversations, the moderation and karma system work really well.

//.
//that was only one slashie.
////.
 
2014-02-07 11:15:48 AM  
Ah Slashdot. The shining example of a community strangling the site.
 
2014-02-07 11:21:41 AM  

kroonermanblack: BumpInTheNight: Zel: Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.

Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.

Slashdot links have digressed to three major genres:  "Everyone should go into Computer Science, except women!" Click bait, "No one should ever pay for software, as an over paid developer I see no downsides to this cunning plan!" type keyboard hippieism or press releases for products and unsustainable SanFran start-ups thinly veiled as news.

So, basically Fark but stupider? At least fark has flavors of crap with nuts, or corn, or sometimes pretty color!


But Fark isn't what it used to be. In traffic or quality.
 
2014-02-07 11:25:12 AM  

MightyPez: Ah Slashdot. The shining example of a community strangling the site.


Yes, because having a userbase is what holds sites back.  Stellar insight.  Myspace and digg must be doing fantastic with all the freedom from complaints they have.
 
2014-02-07 11:25:40 AM  
I must say I am always in the "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" group.  Now, if it's actually broken, or what you are doing is clearly superior, that's different.  But change for change's sake usually results in an inferior product.

Great example: Windows 8.  Windows 7's user interface was nearly pefect, so let's completely change everything about it.  Morons.
 
2014-02-07 11:29:11 AM  
Anytime someone claims the IT community isn't a bunch of sexist racists douche bags I point them to Slashdot. The comments section always proves me right.
 
2014-02-07 11:29:13 AM  
Slashcode's a farking mess, or at least it produces a UI that's a farking mess. However.

The whole farking point of Slashdot is the discussions, and the whole discussion model is based on threading, distributed moderation, and moderation-based display/collapse/hiding of posts.

Beta completely broke the display/collapse/hide model. You can set one threshold; comments scored above that threshold show in their entirety, and comments scored below it are hidden completely.

I have my own feelings about the look of the old site vs. the beta. But without the basic functionality of hiding, collapsing, and displaying based on dual thresholds, beta Just. Doesn't. Work.

I was happy to see the comment section reduced to a seething cauldron of Beta-hate, because the folks running the site gave every impression of ignoring all the feedback they'd gotten over months of lower-intensity beta-testing. This seems to have gotten their attention.

I'd like to see people going back to actual discussion now, but it looks like people aren't willing to let go. Whatever. It's not like I lived there anyhow.
 
2014-02-07 11:35:32 AM  
I wasn't aware that Slashdot was still around.
 
2014-02-07 11:35:54 AM  

Geotpf: I must say I am always in the "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" group.  Now, if it's actually broken, or what you are doing is clearly superior, that's different.  But change for change's sake usually results in an inferior product.

Great example: Windows 8.  Windows 7's user interface was nearly pefect, so let's completely change everything about it.  Morons.


Slashdot's current interface works pretty well.  It's fairly bright with all that white going on, but it's also clean without looking like an advertising mockup for Web 2.0, which the new beta looks like.
 
2014-02-07 11:41:30 AM  
I guess I'm not really worried about the redesign of site I gave up on a time long ago. It's been a while since /. has been anything but a biatch fest (and I speaking as someone who used to love /. ). It's rare that you see a thread there that doesn't rapidly devolve into name calling. It's like the politics tab, but worse.
 
2014-02-07 11:42:14 AM  
Good, kill it off. Let it die.

The redesign is fine, but if the community wants to self destruct, have at. It's been a cesspool for a long time.
 
2014-02-07 11:44:19 AM  

bhcompy: Slashdot's current interface works pretty well. It's fairly bright with all that white going on, but it's also clean without looking like an advertising mockup for Web 2.0, which the new beta looks like.


And, of course, it's not the ads themselves that cause the problems.  It's when maximizing the amount of time looking at ads becomes the only priority in site design.  All you've got left to protest with is your presence.

(So far only one site has been unobtrusive enough in this regard for me to feel justified in turning off adblock plus.  Remember the good google ads?)
 
2014-02-07 11:48:34 AM  

ikanreed: MightyPez: Ah Slashdot. The shining example of a community strangling the site.

Yes, because having a userbase is what holds sites back.  Stellar insight.  Myspace and digg must be doing fantastic with all the freedom from complaints they have.


Wow, it's funny how wrong you took that.

Having a  shiattycommunity holds a site back. I was a regular reader and sometimes commenter on Slashdot and if you didn't follow the zeitgeist you were voted down and screamed at.

"Hey guys, I know Microsoft has done some bad things, but this story about them changing the color of default background really isn't an act of evil."

"Microsoft apologist nazi communist!"
down vote down vote down vote
 
rpm
2014-02-07 11:56:24 AM  

ikanreed: Remember the good google ads?


No.

"Get your free PS3 here" - It was more than a year away
"Download Star Wars Episode 1" - Still in theaters
 
2014-02-07 11:56:49 AM  

MightyPez: Having a shiattycommunity holds a site back


And yet you post on fark.  Give me a break.
 
2014-02-07 11:56:54 AM  

MightyPez: ikanreed: MightyPez: Ah Slashdot. The shining example of a community strangling the site.

Yes, because having a userbase is what holds sites back.  Stellar insight.  Myspace and digg must be doing fantastic with all the freedom from complaints they have.

Wow, it's funny how wrong you took that.

Having a  shiattycommunity holds a site back. I was a regular reader and sometimes commenter on Slashdot and if you didn't follow the zeitgeist you were voted down and screamed at.

"Hey guys, I know Microsoft has done some bad things, but this story about them changing the color of default background really isn't an act of evil."

"Microsoft apologist nazi communist!"
down vote down vote down vote


Let's not forget the near-constant dick waving that goes on.
 
2014-02-07 11:59:08 AM  

pxlboy: Let's not forget the near-constant dick waving that goes on.


web.mit.edu
 
2014-02-07 11:59:12 AM  

pxlboy: MightyPez: ikanreed: MightyPez: Ah Slashdot. The shining example of a community strangling the site.

Yes, because having a userbase is what holds sites back.  Stellar insight.  Myspace and digg must be doing fantastic with all the freedom from complaints they have.

Wow, it's funny how wrong you took that.

Having a  shiattycommunity holds a site back. I was a regular reader and sometimes commenter on Slashdot and if you didn't follow the zeitgeist you were voted down and screamed at.

"Hey guys, I know Microsoft has done some bad things, but this story about them changing the color of default background really isn't an act of evil."

"Microsoft apologist nazi communist!"
down vote down vote down vote

Let's not forget the near-constant dick waving that goes on.


Oh yeah. How could I forget about that? Slashdot was a great site for tech and industry information. Then it started becoming a Mad Max-style cesspool.
 
2014-02-07 11:59:38 AM  

MightyPez: ikanreed: MightyPez: Ah Slashdot. The shining example of a community strangling the site.

Yes, because having a userbase is what holds sites back.  Stellar insight.  Myspace and digg must be doing fantastic with all the freedom from complaints they have.

Wow, it's funny how wrong you took that.

Having a  shiattycommunity holds a site back. I was a regular reader and sometimes commenter on Slashdot and if you didn't follow the zeitgeist you were voted down and screamed at.

"Hey guys, I know Microsoft has done some bad things, but this story about them changing the color of default background really isn't an act of evil."

"Microsoft apologist nazi communist!"
down vote down vote down vote


You M$ shill

/that's how it is done here
 
2014-02-07 12:00:02 PM  

ikanreed: MightyPez: Having a shiattycommunity holds a site back

And yet you post on fark.  Give me a break.


Dude, Slashot isn't going to sleep with you. You're trying too hard.
 
2014-02-07 12:01:50 PM  
Never been there. Doesn't sound different than Fark. Is it closing?
 
2014-02-07 12:06:18 PM  

unchellmatt: pxlboy: Let's not forget the near-constant dick waving that goes on.

[web.mit.edu image 201x250]


Well played.
 
2014-02-07 12:10:28 PM  

Guadior42: styckx: So they hate it because it's easy on the eyes and comments section is not a clusterfark?

The comments section is the only good thing about the old design. Yeah, it's ugly. But the threaded conversations, the moderation and karma system work really well.

//.
//that was only one slashie.
////.


You should try nested view. It's had an issue for about 15 years now that if a first level comment had enough replies and sub-replies, etc, that comment would appear at the top of the next two or three pages.
 
2014-02-07 12:15:34 PM  
I can't stand that "threading" format for comments.
 
2014-02-07 12:20:05 PM  
So where do you go for insightful tech discussion?
 
2014-02-07 12:20:36 PM  

Geotpf: I must say I am always in the "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" group.  Now, if it's actually broken, or what you are doing is clearly superior, that's different.  But change for change's sake usually results in an inferior product.

Great example: Windows 8.  Windows 7's user interface was nearly pefect, so let's completely change everything about it.  Morons.


I think the important part is "clearly superior" when making such major changes. Often you can compare a couple of designs and find one is slightly better than the other overall (individual changes can be much better/much worse, but generally there are negatives and positives between the two, so overall it tends to usually be less clear cut).


If creating a new site/app then pick the best one. With something existing the presumption should always be to stay the same as you have potentially years (or decades) of user experience and knowledge of how to use the app/site you are discarding when you change things, so until you can get something that is clearly better for the vast majority of users you should hold back.


Making small incremental changes/improvements should generally be the preferred route, although there are usually limits of how far that can go (and in some cases there are commercial considerations where you want to sell the improvements and so incremental changes would undercut future sales).
 
2014-02-07 12:23:37 PM  

Zel: Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.

Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.


owmyballsidiocracy.jpg
 
2014-02-07 12:37:35 PM  

Nemo's Brother: kroonermanblack: BumpInTheNight: Zel: Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.

Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.

Slashdot links have digressed to three major genres:  "Everyone should go into Computer Science, except women!" Click bait, "No one should ever pay for software, as an over paid developer I see no downsides to this cunning plan!" type keyboard hippieism or press releases for products and unsustainable SanFran start-ups thinly veiled as news.

So, basically Fark but stupider? At least fark has flavors of crap with nuts, or corn, or sometimes pretty color!

But Fark isn't what it used to be. In traffic or quality.


Remember when Fark was good?

Fark was never good.
 
2014-02-07 12:40:38 PM  

Hofheim: unchellmatt: pxlboy: Let's not forget the near-constant dick waving that goes on.

[web.mit.edu image 201x250]

Well played.


This.
 
2014-02-07 12:41:04 PM  
Slashdot UI is the only thing worse than trying to navigate Reddit.
 
2014-02-07 12:44:02 PM  
One comment put it thusly:

I've got to say that the initial post on this topic perpetuates one of the paradigms that is sticking in the craws of Slashdot users. We are not an audience. We might be users, we might be members, we most certainly are contributors. But we are not an audience.

If you persist in thinking of us that way, then you're going to get it wrong. You serve an audience differently than you serve contributing members of a community. Most of the complaints hinge on that difference.

If we were an audience, we'd be coming here for the articles. Most of the complaints are about the comment system, how difficult it is to follow a conversation, how difficult it is leave a comment, etc. I come here, most of us come here, to read what my/our fellow slashdotters have to say. The value here is the community, and the most important contributors are other members, not the site or the editors.

If you don't get that straight, then you aren't going to "get" why we're upset, so there's no chance that you'll deliver us something that we can live with. And that community is going to vanish, leaving you with nothing of value.
You can take suggestions and maybe reduce the implosion, but unless you understand *why* we're upset, you're going to be heading in fundamentally the wrong direction.


Which is funny, because I stopped reading Slashdot when I got tired of the  "community."  I'm a human being, in the business of IT, not some basement dwelling linux zealot.

If slashdot is retooled into a IT news aggregator, instead of a whiny nerd circlejerk, I might just stop by again.

If I never have to read M$ again, I'll be happy.
 
2014-02-07 12:45:21 PM  

fang06554: MightyPez: ikanreed: MightyPez: Ah Slashdot. The shining example of a community strangling the site.

Yes, because having a userbase is what holds sites back.  Stellar insight.  Myspace and digg must be doing fantastic with all the freedom from complaints they have.

Wow, it's funny how wrong you took that.

Having a  shiattycommunity holds a site back. I was a regular reader and sometimes commenter on Slashdot and if you didn't follow the zeitgeist you were voted down and screamed at.

"Hey guys, I know Microsoft has done some bad things, but this story about them changing the color of default background really isn't an act of evil."

"Microsoft apologist nazi communist!"
down vote down vote down vote

You M$ shill

/that's how it is done here


STOP SPREADING FUD
 
2014-02-07 12:46:08 PM  

xria: Geotpf: I must say I am always in the "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" group.  Now, if it's actually broken, or what you are doing is clearly superior, that's different.  But change for change's sake usually results in an inferior product.

Great example: Windows 8.  Windows 7's user interface was nearly pefect, so let's completely change everything about it.  Morons.

I think the important part is "clearly superior" when making such major changes. Often you can compare a couple of designs and find one is slightly better than the other overall (individual changes can be much better/much worse, but generally there are negatives and positives between the two, so overall it tends to usually be less clear cut).


If creating a new site/app then pick the best one. With something existing the presumption should always be to stay the same as you have potentially years (or decades) of user experience and knowledge of how to use the app/site you are discarding when you change things, so until you can get something that is clearly better for the vast majority of users you should hold back.


Making small incremental changes/improvements should generally be the preferred route, although there are usually limits of how far that can go (and in some cases there are commercial considerations where you want to sell the improvements and so incremental changes would undercut future sales).


Yup.  If a total redesign (of anything; this applies to much more than just websites) is only "slightly better"-don't bother.

In any case, it seems clear that the version they were testing at /. was not even "slightly better" but instead was "totally broken".
 
2014-02-07 12:53:27 PM  
I had forgotten all about slashdot.  I used to go there all the time when I first started screwing around with Linux but then I realized I never really wanted to install Linux or FreeBSD on a toaster or blender, I kind of never went back.
 
2014-02-07 12:56:28 PM  

MadMonk: I had forgotten all about slashdot.  I used to go there all the time when I first started screwing around with Linux but then I realized I never really wanted to install Linux or FreeBSD on a toaster or blender, I kind of never went back.


Is this the year of the linux toaster?
 
2014-02-07 12:59:09 PM  

sendtodave: MadMonk: I had forgotten all about slashdot.  I used to go there all the time when I first started screwing around with Linux but then I realized I never really wanted to install Linux or FreeBSD on a toaster or blender, I kind of never went back.

Is this the year of the linux toaster?


Nope.  Non-compatible yeast.
 
2014-02-07 01:14:09 PM  

PainInTheASP: sendtodave: MadMonk: I had forgotten all about slashdot.  I used to go there all the time when I first started screwing around with Linux but then I realized I never really wanted to install Linux or FreeBSD on a toaster or blender, I kind of never went back.

Is this the year of the linux toaster?

Nope.  Non-compatible yeast.


Curse you, Microorganism$oft!
 
2014-02-07 01:14:38 PM  
Slashdot Beta has only one good feature.

The ability to switch it off and use the normal site.

Supposedly, that's going to be removed at some point, though.
 
2014-02-07 01:15:48 PM  
I still read slashdot because they're a good tech/science aggregator. I wish the geek tab had half as many interesting stories.

I don't participate in the community - fark clicking to expand comments, fark voting and groupthink, fark it all. It's a shiatty system and I won't participate.

That said, beta is a steaming pile of shiat. It took everything that I liked about slashdot - the fact that you can quickly scroll through a linear list of interesting stories - and turned it into a godawful mess resembling Huffpost, brietbart, or other infotainment site.
 
2014-02-07 01:25:53 PM  

Elegy: beta is a steaming pile of shiat. It took everything that I liked about slashdot - the fact that you can quickly scroll through a linear list of interesting stories - and turned it into a godawful mess resembling Huffpost, brietbart, or other infotainment site.


img.fark.net

vs

img.fark.net

...

Less functional to scroll through?  Not seeing it.
 
2014-02-07 01:47:25 PM  

sendtodave: One comment put it thusly:

I've got to say that the initial post on this topic perpetuates one of the paradigms that is sticking in the craws of Slashdot users. We are not an audience. We might be users, we might be members, we most certainly are contributors. But we are not an audience.

If you persist in thinking of us that way, then you're going to get it wrong. You serve an audience differently than you serve contributing members of a community. Most of the complaints hinge on that difference.

If we were an audience, we'd be coming here for the articles. Most of the complaints are about the comment system, how difficult it is to follow a conversation, how difficult it is leave a comment, etc. I come here, most of us come here, to read what my/our fellow slashdotters have to say. The value here is the community, and the most important contributors are other members, not the site or the editors.

If you don't get that straight, then you aren't going to "get" why we're upset, so there's no chance that you'll deliver us something that we can live with. And that community is going to vanish, leaving you with nothing of value.
You can take suggestions and maybe reduce the implosion, but unless you understand *why* we're upset, you're going to be heading in fundamentally the wrong direction.

Which is funny, because I stopped reading Slashdot when I got tired of the  "community."  I'm a human being, in the business of IT, not some basement dwelling linux zealot.

If slashdot is retooled into a IT news aggregator, instead of a whiny nerd circlejerk, I might just stop by again.

If I never have to read M$ again, I'll be happy.


Ironically, I found Fark through Slashdot.  The thing that instantly struck me about Fark was they the comment were often as (if not more) insightful than the original article.

Slashdot was usually the opposite.

Furthermore, perhaps Slashdot wants to grow past its current "user" base and has to decide if its worth risking the loss of a few of those users in exchange for  better overall user experience.
 
2014-02-07 01:57:19 PM  
Slashdot has sucked since the mid 2000's anyways.  That site is still around?
 
2014-02-07 02:24:31 PM  

sendtodave: Elegy: beta is a steaming pile of shiat. It took everything that I liked about slashdot - the fact that you can quickly scroll through a linear list of interesting stories - and turned it into a godawful mess resembling Huffpost, brietbart, or other infotainment site.

[img.fark.net image 793x460]

vs

[img.fark.net image 793x460]

...

Less functional to scroll through?  Not seeing it.


Have you tried being a pedantic, change-hating whiner? Seems to be a pre-requisite.
 
2014-02-07 03:26:39 PM  
I thought Slashdot was already a site for betas?

/No Linux distro is more aptly named than "Fedora".
 
2014-02-07 03:43:19 PM  

sendtodave: Elegy: beta is a steaming pile of shiat. It took everything that I liked about slashdot - the fact that you can quickly scroll through a linear list of interesting stories - and turned it into a godawful mess resembling Huffpost, brietbart, or other infotainment site.

[img.fark.net image 793x460]

vs

[img.fark.net image 793x460]

...

Less functional to scroll through?  Not seeing it.


Here's what I'm seeing.  Two stories with summaries AND a big ass whimpering "we hear you" box on the regular site, versus one story and just six lines of text on the Beta site even WITHOUT the whimpering box.  FAR FAR less information density.  Right before I refreshed there was one story and about 15 lines of text on the classic site.  (No idea why the top story is different on each; I refreshed both.)

img.fark.net

vs.


img.fark.net
I just lurk at Slashdot (much as I did here until very recently), but the Beta site is terrible and the user revolt in all the threads is somewhat glorious to behold.

As to the "M$" stuff, that seems to be largely a thing of the past -- I've seen many pro-Microsoft posts with +5 ratings.

Slashdot is not a good news aggregator site, because the summaries stink and the editors have ALWAYS been bloody awful at their jobs (typos, duplicates, etc.).  But as the biatchfesters say, its strength was in the high quality of discussion, and driving away good users is not a good move.  Some of them have pointed to Fark as an example (among many) of what happens when a site disregards its core audience.

/10 posts per thread the new normal
 
2014-02-07 04:05:02 PM  
Do they have a place where I can rage and demand a full refund of my $5?
 
2014-02-07 04:17:23 PM  

The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves: Do they have a place where I can rage and demand a full refund of my $5?


Everything's about money, right dummy?
 
2014-02-07 04:40:16 PM  
Actually, it's better than it used to be
farm1.staticflickr.com
 
2014-02-07 04:56:43 PM  
I never once saw the beta, and when I saw the threads turning into "WTF!"-fests, I decided not to even try the beta mode. That being said, Fark is a lot more fun.

impaler: I can't stand that "threading" format for comments.


That's been the most annoying thing. On web forums, I prefer linear comments. The only system where I ever really appreciated threading was Usenet with a proper newsreader like tin or trn.
 
2014-02-07 05:00:32 PM  

Fubegra: I never once saw the beta, and when I saw the threads turning into "WTF!"-fests, I decided not to even try the beta mode. That being said, Fark is a lot more fun.

impaler: I can't stand that "threading" format for comments.

That's been the most annoying thing. On web forums, I prefer linear comments. The only system where I ever really appreciated threading was Usenet with a proper newsreader like tin or trn.


Threading is farking awful almost everywhere.  It's infested almost all e-mail clients too.  (I had to hunt a bit to turn it off in the new version of K-9 Mail on Android -- threading was on by default!)

I can't understand how people can tolerate Reddit, let alone the bizarre travesties of places like Gawker.  It's actually still painful trying to read comments on Gawker sites.
 
2014-02-07 05:19:06 PM  

Geotpf: I must say I am always in the "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" group.  Now, if it's actually broken, or what you are doing is clearly superior, that's different.  But change for change's sake usually results in an inferior product.

Great example: Windows 8.  Windows 7's user interface was nearly pefect 17 years old, so let's completely change everything about it, since tablets and touch devices are all the rageMorons.


FIFY

And morons are the ones who don't know how to get back to the desktop interface.
 
2014-02-07 05:30:11 PM  

The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves: Actually, it's better than it used to be


Haha, I actually remember that front page. Takes me back, makes me want to see a GNAA or a Beowulf cluster comment here.
 
2014-02-07 05:30:37 PM  

peterthx: Geotpf: I must say I am always in the "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" group.  Now, if it's actually broken, or what you are doing is clearly superior, that's different.  But change for change's sake usually results in an inferior product.

Great example: Windows 8. Klingon Street Signage And Green Means Stop.  English Street Signs and Green Means Go  user interface was nearly pefect 17 150 years old, so let's completely change everything about it, since tablets and touch devices science fiction and paradigm breaking are all the rage.  Morons.

FIFY

And morons are the ones who don't know how to use a Klingon dictionary and drive backwards while yelling out the window to get home.  get back to the desktop interface<


/but really, this shiat again?

 
2014-02-07 05:34:50 PM  
Forcing javascripted threaded discussion is what made me stop hanging out there.

Give me flat HTML or give me , errr somehing dramatic but not death

/and I had a user number under 4096 too
 
2014-02-07 05:44:39 PM  

Vlad_the_Inaner: Forcing javascripted threaded discussion is what made me stop hanging out there.

Give me flat HTML or give me , errr somehing dramatic but not death

/and I had a user number under 4096 too


At one point you could have sold that for some serious money.  But there may be a fire sale on 4 digit accounts if they keep up with the shiny shiny WordPress clone.

/I like WordPress
/but not for forums
 
2014-02-07 05:44:46 PM  
Years and years ago, it had insightful posts and discussions on technology. The "M$ sucks!" camp was just the beginning of the downward spiral. Today, it's the geek equivalent of the politics tab. Just a bunch of useless posturing by crazy people who shouldn't be let anywhere near a computer, with the occasional funny post. Even when interesting topics get posted, there's almost no discussion about the actual technology.
 
2014-02-07 05:48:22 PM  
Slashdot was dying - Dice's quarterly report wrote down the entire division as worthless. They had to increase ad sales or the site would just be closed or become some ridiculous husk of its former self (worse than this).

The modern web is funded by annoying its readers. If web sites didn't annoy their readers, the ads wouldn't get seen, and the sites would go bankrupt.
 
2014-02-07 05:53:15 PM  

Far Cough: Vlad_the_Inaner: Forcing javascripted threaded discussion is what made me stop hanging out there.

Give me flat HTML or give me , errr somehing dramatic but not death

/and I had a user number under 4096 too

At one point you could have sold that for some serious money.  But there may be a fire sale on 4 digit accounts if they keep up with the shiny shiny WordPress clone.

/I like WordPress
/but not for forums


It has my real name on it.  Not sure it'd be wise to sell with that, even if I had an offer
 
2014-02-07 05:54:02 PM  

Myria: Slashdot was dying - Dice's quarterly report wrote down the entire division as worthless. They had to increase ad sales or the site would just be closed or become some ridiculous husk of its former self (worse than this).


Except that "this" isn't there yet.  This is far from the worst of it.  Once they push the new interface to 100% of visitors instead of the current 25% of visitors, all the core geeks will have gone.  (That's happening now really.)

So they'll have a tech news site without any tech audience.  Worse than CNet or the Fark Geek tab.

The only other decent place around is ArsTechnica, which isn't what it used to be either (and I don't love their forums).

Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Any suggestions for a decent tech news site?
 
2014-02-07 06:00:03 PM  

Far Cough: Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.


Well, now that custom TLDs are for sale, I was thinking it should become slashdot.dot.
 
2014-02-07 06:06:25 PM  

Far Cough: Myria: Slashdot was dying - Dice's quarterly report wrote down the entire division as worthless. They had to increase ad sales or the site would just be closed or become some ridiculous husk of its former self (worse than this).

Except that "this" isn't there yet.  This is far from the worst of it.  Once they push the new interface to 100% of visitors instead of the current 25% of visitors, all the core geeks will have gone.  (That's happening now really.)

So they'll have a tech news site without any tech audience.  Worse than CNet or the Fark Geek tab.

The only other decent place around is ArsTechnica, which isn't what it used to be either (and I don't love their forums).

Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Any suggestions for a decent tech news site?

No all of them have some kind of bias against some company or the other.
/The Verge takes top spot with bias and slow loading video.
 
2014-02-07 06:12:24 PM  

Vlad_the_Inaner: Far Cough: Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Well, now that custom TLDs are for sale, I was thinking it should become slashdot.dot.


I think you mean .slashdot ?

drjekel_mrhyde: Far Cough: Myria: Slashdot was dying - Dice's quarterly report wrote down the entire division as worthless. They had to increase ad sales or the site would just be closed or become some ridiculous husk of its former self (worse than this).

Except that "this" isn't there yet.  This is far from the worst of it.  Once they push the new interface to 100% of visitors instead of the current 25% of visitors, all the core geeks will have gone.  (That's happening now really.)

So they'll have a tech news site without any tech audience.  Worse than CNet or the Fark Geek tab.

The only other decent place around is ArsTechnica, which isn't what it used to be either (and I don't love their forums).

Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Any suggestions for a decent tech news site?
No all of them have some kind of bias against some company or the other.
/The Verge takes top spot with bias and slow loading video.


Yeah, the TWiT guys seem to like it but if you visit it with a computer or device more than a year old it's like waiting for Tom Sawyer to finish painting in a fence.  I've actively avoided it after trying it once or twice.

Every once in a while I see a link to a decent ExtremeTech article, which is surprising to me, considering its origins.
 
2014-02-07 06:15:35 PM  

poot_rootbeer: I thought Slashdot was already a site for betas?


Does that explain your posts there?
 
2014-02-07 06:17:06 PM  

peterthx: Geotpf: I must say I am always in the "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" group.  Now, if it's actually broken, or what you are doing is clearly superior, that's different.  But change for change's sake usually results in an inferior product.

Great example: Windows 8.  Windows 7's user interface was nearly pefect 17 years old, so let's completely change everything about it, since tablets and touch devices are all the rage.  Morons.

FIFY

And morons are the ones who don't know how to get back to the desktop interface.


Ok, so where's the Start menu?  (And don't say download an additional program-subtracting features isn't an improvement.)

Windows 8 would be like a car where the car maker decided to make it so that you can steer with your feet, although if you pull a lever every time you start it you can go back to steering with your hands-but the speedometer is gone, although you can buy one on the aftermarket if you must have one.
 
2014-02-07 06:39:37 PM  

Far Cough: Vlad_the_Inaner: Far Cough: Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Well, now that custom TLDs are for sale, I was thinking it should become slashdot.dot.

I think you mean .slashdot ?


No, not what I intended , the site's name is a joke when pronounced aloud.  The URL is

Aych tee tee pee colon slash slash slash dot  dot org.

My suggestion would make it even more confusing

Aych tee tee pee colon slash slash slash dot dot dot

/now http://slashdot.slashdot does have potential, but I like the seeming ellipsis at the end of mine, and the alliteration with "dash dash dash dot dot dot"
 
2014-02-07 06:39:56 PM  

Handsome B. Wonderful: Does that explain your posts there?



Don't dredge up those memories.  The ponytail to my ass and the giant tinted glasses, oh god.

/ clean since 2009
// left when it became clear an admin was withholding moderator privs from me for publicly calling him out on abuses of power
/// and when I got a haircut and a girlfriend
 
2014-02-07 06:42:18 PM  

Vlad_the_Inaner: Far Cough: Vlad_the_Inaner: Far Cough: Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Well, now that custom TLDs are for sale, I was thinking it should become slashdot.dot.

I think you mean .slashdot ?

No, not what I intended , the site's name is a joke when pronounced aloud.  The URL is

Aych tee tee pee colon slash slash slash dot  dot org.

My suggestion would make it even more confusing

Aych tee tee pee colon slash slash slash dot dot dot

/now http://slashdot.slashdot does have potential, but I like the seeming ellipsis at the end of mine, and the alliteration with "dash dash dash dot dot dot"


I knew the first part, but I think you just proved why you're worthy of a 4 digit Slashdot UID.  :)
 
2014-02-07 07:41:25 PM  
encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com

It should look more like this.
 
2014-02-07 07:50:08 PM  
Weird to see all the hate here. the comments are still great and well moderated. There is a big difference if you are logged in and have carefully tweaked your settings. The whole point is flexibility, so you customize the comments to be how you'd like them.

The moderation system though is what makes slashdot great, I wish something more like it was on more sites.
 
2014-02-07 08:45:42 PM  
The problem with Slashdot isn't the HTML or the comments, it's the lack of vetting for stories. Some seriously stupid shiat gets through.

Ars is a better site for tech news anyway.
 
2014-02-07 09:07:32 PM  

The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves: Actually, it's better than it used to be
[farm1.staticflickr.com image 850x564]


i.imgur.com

I dunno about that.
/it was April Fool's Day 2006, how does she do that?!
 
2014-02-07 09:22:00 PM  

Far Cough: Threading is farking awful almost everywhere. It's infested almost all e-mail clients too. (I had to hunt a bit to turn it off in the new version of K-9 Mail on Android -- threading was on by default!)


You are *so* lucky you are too young to remember Usenet.
 
2014-02-07 10:13:03 PM  
 <0)
 (  \
  x
8===D
 
2014-02-08 01:49:21 AM  

Ivo Shandor:
<0)
 (  \
  x
8===D


Incident with the bird,
BSD Netcraft confirmed,
Stephen King is still alive,
Natalie is petrified!

We didn't start the fire,
It was always trollin' since Slashdot was rollin'...
 
2014-02-08 02:01:39 AM  

llamalarity: Far Cough: Threading is farking awful almost everywhere. It's infested almost all e-mail clients too. (I had to hunt a bit to turn it off in the new version of K-9 Mail on Android -- threading was on by default!)

You are *so* lucky you are too young to remember Usenet.


go ahead, tell him about the evil that is 'top posting'
 
2014-02-08 04:14:52 AM  
Dozens of people must be outraged.
 
2014-02-08 04:16:55 AM  
God, I hated top posting

Vlad_the_Inaner:
go ahead, tell him about the evil that is 'top posting'

 llamalarity:

You are *so* lucky you are too young to remember Usenet.
Far Cough: Threading is farking awful almost everywhere. It's infested almost all e-mail clients too. (I had to hunt a bit to turn it off in the new version of K-9 Mail on Android -- threading was on by default!)
 
2014-02-08 06:00:47 AM  
Vlad_the_Inaner:
go ahead, tell him about the evil that is 'top posting'

Bottom posting (with out snipping) is far worse! The reason people /think/ it is correct is that in a short exchange interspersed resembles bottom posting.

/dash, dash, space, enter
//nice addition
///did not have slashies in the old days
 
2014-02-08 06:00:57 AM  
I might be a bit behind the times but i feel like i haven't seen a slashdot link in many years.  What does Dice have to do with anything?
 
2014-02-08 06:41:38 AM  

Twilight Farkle: Fark's present design burns about 2" of space on the right column


http://m.fark.com/comments/8133044?from_page=geek#new
 
2014-02-08 11:56:59 AM  

Far Cough: Myria: Slashdot was dying - Dice's quarterly report wrote down the entire division as worthless. They had to increase ad sales or the site would just be closed or become some ridiculous husk of its former self (worse than this).

Except that "this" isn't there yet.  This is far from the worst of it.  Once they push the new interface to 100% of visitors instead of the current 25% of visitors, all the core geeks will have gone.  (That's happening now really.)

So they'll have a tech news site without any tech audience.  Worse than CNet or the Fark Geek tab.

The only other decent place around is ArsTechnica, which isn't what it used to be either (and I don't love their forums).

Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Any suggestions for a decent tech news site?


There is something in the works springing from the not yet cold corpse of slashdot --> http://www.altslashdot.org
 
2014-02-08 12:40:09 PM  
I keep hoping the staff at slashdot will take a moment to listen to Joe's discussion and analysis of the "You'll get over it" redesign, in which - after learning that lesson the hard way - he details precisely the ways that slashdot/dice is farking up right now.

That talk was posted in 2011 and was given at NOTACON 8, so really, they should understand these lessons already. Of course, the staff over there has been ignoring any reasoned response, so I doubt they'll take the time to watch the talk. *sigh*
 
2014-02-08 01:09:34 PM  
everyone complained just as much the last time it was re-designed. Whining and impotent nerd rage is a slashdot specialty.
 
2014-02-08 01:26:45 PM  

InterruptingQuirk: Far Cough: Myria: Slashdot was dying - Dice's quarterly report wrote down the entire division as worthless. They had to increase ad sales or the site would just be closed or become some ridiculous husk of its former self (worse than this).

Except that "this" isn't there yet.  This is far from the worst of it.  Once they push the new interface to 100% of visitors instead of the current 25% of visitors, all the core geeks will have gone.  (That's happening now really.)

So they'll have a tech news site without any tech audience.  Worse than CNet or the Fark Geek tab.

The only other decent place around is ArsTechnica, which isn't what it used to be either (and I don't love their forums).

Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Any suggestions for a decent tech news site?

There is something in the works springing from the not yet cold corpse of slashdot --> http://www.altslashdot.org


Um, yeah, I mentioned it in the post you quoted, but thanks. Unfortunately there's no there there, yet. And yeah I know/knew Usenet.
 
2014-02-08 01:36:51 PM  

Far Cough: InterruptingQuirk: Far Cough: Myria: Slashdot was dying - Dice's quarterly report wrote down the entire division as worthless. They had to increase ad sales or the site would just be closed or become some ridiculous husk of its former self (worse than this).

Except that "this" isn't there yet.  This is far from the worst of it.  Once they push the new interface to 100% of visitors instead of the current 25% of visitors, all the core geeks will have gone.  (That's happening now really.)

So they'll have a tech news site without any tech audience.  Worse than CNet or the Fark Geek tab.

The only other decent place around is ArsTechnica, which isn't what it used to be either (and I don't love their forums).

Seems like there are a few pushes for a Slashdot replacement (one is altslashdot.org or altslash.org) but nothing's really there yet.

Any suggestions for a decent tech news site?

There is something in the works springing from the not yet cold corpse of slashdot --> http://www.altslashdot.org

Um, yeah, I mentioned it in the post you quoted, but thanks. Unfortunately there's no there there, yet. And yeah I know/knew Usenet.


Sorry, I skimmed and didn't see hyperlink colors.
 
2014-02-08 01:46:45 PM  

chasd00: everyone complained just as much the last time it was re-designed. Whining and impotent nerd rage is a slashdot specialty.


Completely untrue (except for the second sentence). There was biatching and complaining and constructive criticism, but nothing like the current user base revolt, boycott/protest, and thread pollution by long time members. This is probably the end of the site.
 
2014-02-08 03:43:33 PM  

kroonermanblack: BumpInTheNight: Zel: Princess Ryans Knickers: Beta design way easier on the eyes than the old one.

Unless you wanted to read a lot of text, then all that whitespace is a detriment. I bought big monitors so I could read a lot of text, not so marketing jerks can fill it with ads.

Slashdot links have digressed to three major genres:  "Everyone should go into Computer Science, except women!" Click bait, "No one should ever pay for software, as an over paid developer I see no downsides to this cunning plan!" type keyboard hippieism or press releases for products and unsustainable SanFran start-ups thinly veiled as news.

So, basically Fark but stupider? At least fark has flavors of crap with nuts, or corn, or sometimes pretty color!


And boobies, thank god for the boobies/NSFW links
 
Displayed 102 of 102 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report