ManateeGag: ok, so because the XBox has a web browser and a DVD player that means it made the kid watch porn?
ManateeGag: where were the parents in all this?
Mike_LowELL: So I take it Kotaku doesn't write about games anymore?
LoneVVolf: [filmdump.files.wordpress.com image 850x459]/Thanksgiving is going to be awkward in that house for a few years...
m00: vicioushobbit: Talking to a counselor =/= knowing that somebody is still jacking off to the shiat that traumatized you./the more you know...Look I don't disagree with the conclusion -- that clearly talking to counselors does less harm than the original incident. But you can't use a statement that makes no sense because it has an obvious counter-example (within the context of the very discussion!) to get there.It's like saying... Creationism is nonsense. I have irrefutable proof for the currently accepted scientific model -- Lord Xenu told me so.
AbortionsForAll: vicioushobbit: AbortionsForAll: vicioushobbit: AbortionsForAll: The funny thing is, the various social workers & law-enforcement personnel who are caring for the little girl/victim are almost certainly doing vastly more damage than the brother/rapist actually did. It's probably a non-stop train of hand-wringing adults, telling her about how damaged she now is, etc.You have experience on this topic? Data? Citations?No?Then fark you and the horse you rode in on.What makes you so sure I don't have direct experience on the matter..?Seems to me like you should take your assumptions, and use them to fark yourself.Then lay out your argument as to why she is more damaged by the professional help.No. No, I don't think I will. Just because I said something you don't like on an internet forum, it doesn't lay a burden on me demanding that I cite references & statistics. It might be different if references & statistics were what was being discussed or if I was perhaps writing for a professional publication but being as this is the comments section of fark.com, I don't really need to go through such trouble.That said, I already did lay out my argument. Said argument being that the numerous adults which the victim is now interacting with are probably doing more long-term damage than the actual rapist, due to the fact that they are no-doubt relentlessly drilling into her the idea that she is damaged and that she should be extremely upset, etc. It's not a complicated concept requiring lengthy explanation.As for any direct experience I might or might not have on the matter... Again, this is fark.com. I am under no obligation (legal or otherwise) to divulge my personal life and experiences. Of course, you're free to ask but I'm also free to decline.
miss diminutive: Well-adjusted, empathetic and reasonable 13 year olds don't rape their siblings just because they viewed some pornography. At 13 they know enough to understand how these actions are wrong and can impact another person.I suspect there's more to the story here.
jso2897: LoneVVolf: [filmdump.files.wordpress.com image 850x459]/Thanksgiving is going to be awkward in that house for a few years...Thanksgiving in Britain is always an awkward occasion.
James10952001: Why is there no edit feature?
LowbrowDeluxe: Was she hot? I mean if we're going to figure out who or what to blame we have to check all the angles.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Aug 22 2017 15:13:38
Runtime: 0.475 sec (474 ms)