Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Newspaper)   ACLU and EFF sue LAPD over ALPR   (thenewspaper.com) divider line 10
    More: Interesting, ACLU, LAPD, Electronic Freedom Foundation  
•       •       •

3688 clicks; posted to Main » on 03 Feb 2014 at 2:34 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2014-02-03 02:54:21 PM  
2 votes:
ALPR is almost as bad as SCMODS.
2014-02-04 08:52:52 AM  
1 votes:

CruiserTwelve: geekbikerskum: The ability to amass large amounts of data on the movements of ordinary citizens and sift through that data is unprecedented, and drastically reduces if not eliminates the notion of anonymity in public spaces.

License plate readers don't actually track any specific person's movements. They simply record the location of all vehicles at specific times, something anyone standing on a street corner could do. If there is a violation of privacy, and there is an argument whether someone has a right to privacy while on a public street, it comes when the data is retrieved. If the police use that data to track you while you are doing something perfectly legal, that would be a violation. If they use it to identify the location of violators, then it's legally and ethically acceptable.

Given the massive amounts of data these things record, it's impossible for the cops to track a random person's movements unless they specifically sought to track their movements.

If it offends a person because they had their license plate tracked in public, then the only way to avoid that is to stay home. You can't expect privacy in a public place.

So far the only use I've seen for license plate readers has been good. Example: A woman complained to the police that her ex-husband violated a protection order by continuously driving past her house. He denied being anywhere near her house at the time of the alleged violations. However, an LPR showed him passing through a nearby intersection at the time of the violation and when he claimed to be at home across town. He was charged and convicted based on that evidence.

I can give other examples too, all of which are legitimate uses of the LPR.


Dood, you GOTTA start reading some Sherlock Holmes books. You desperately need a clue before you hurt yourself.
2014-02-03 05:44:41 PM  
1 votes:

Satanic_Hamster: Yeah, there's no way that cunning plan of yours can fail or be a hindrance to the public well being.


CruiserTwelve says there are laws to prevent that from happening.
2014-02-03 05:39:00 PM  
1 votes:
i1.ytimg.com

Seeing as how the VP is such a VIP, shouldn't we keep the PC on the QT? 'Cause if it leaks to the VC he could end up MIA, and then we'd all be put on KP.
2014-02-03 03:06:46 PM  
1 votes:
OMFG
2014-02-03 03:04:53 PM  
1 votes:

The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves: ALPR is almost as bad as SCMODS.


Is it serious?
2014-02-03 02:43:34 PM  
1 votes:
TL;DR
2014-02-03 02:39:47 PM  
1 votes:
BFD.
2014-02-03 02:38:31 PM  
1 votes:
SO?
2014-02-03 02:26:16 PM  
1 votes:
WTF?
 
Displayed 10 of 10 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report