If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fark)   Subby writing a paper for school about online forums and their sex lives. How often do you have it?   (fark.com) divider line 233
    More: Survey  
•       •       •

1987 clicks; posted to Main » on 01 Feb 2014 at 4:58 PM (24 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



233 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-02-01 12:40:22 PM
Online forums have sex lives?
Rule 34
 
2014-02-01 12:40:47 PM
Fark is not your personal porno site.
 
2014-02-01 12:41:41 PM
all the time, right now
 
2014-02-01 12:41:52 PM
3-4 times a week with the wife, 10-15 with Rosie Redpalm.
 
2014-02-01 12:42:33 PM
Ask your girlfriend, she'll tell you how many times I have sex.
 
2014-02-01 12:43:07 PM
I think you're asking the wrong people.
 
2014-02-01 12:43:57 PM
between 0 and a bazillion times a day
 
2014-02-01 12:46:26 PM

Pincy: Ask your girlfriend, she'll tell you how many times I have sex.


Mom.

/ too easy
// your mom is
 
2014-02-01 12:47:02 PM

sn82: I think you're asking the wrong people.


Well, TFettes have sex with ten different dudes a day, and TFers have sex with themselves. Subby should have specifically asked TFettes.
 
2014-02-01 12:50:56 PM

swaniefrmreddeer: sn82: I think you're asking the wrong people.

Well, TFettes have sex with ten different dudes a day, and TFers have sex with themselves. Subby should have specifically asked TFettes.


TFettes get all the sex. ALL OF IT
 
2014-02-01 12:55:12 PM
You're writing a paper? Well that's just the cutest thing I've heard all day.


/I don't have sex with online forums; you'll get a nasty STI.
 
2014-02-01 12:55:17 PM
Right now, about once a week..
 
2014-02-01 12:56:56 PM
Not nearly enough
 
2014-02-01 01:22:17 PM
wait, sex in a forum? a cyber gangbang? what?
 
2014-02-01 01:31:13 PM

LaurenAguilera: wait, sex in a forum? a cyber gangbang? what?


*Bender unzips his pants...*
 
2014-02-01 01:34:14 PM
OH GOD.
 
2014-02-01 01:43:47 PM
I have lots of sex with things.  drains, paper towel rolls, dead animals, pizza, cushions, tail pipes, homeless people, cardboard, raw bacon, live pigs, snow vaginas, snow anus', imaginary people, horse mating analogues, gatorade bottles, and shoes.
 
2014-02-01 01:52:56 PM

LaurenAguilera: OH GOD.


Green. This should be good...

reactiongifs.me
 
2014-02-01 01:54:05 PM
It's been longer than I'd like to admit.
 
2014-02-01 01:57:07 PM
What's sex?
 
2014-02-01 02:02:53 PM
Like, within the last year or two? Less than once a year on average.

f*ck.
 
2014-02-01 02:04:07 PM
I have sex frequently but never while I'm logged on to an online forum.  My spelling and grammar suffers.
 
2014-02-01 02:04:25 PM
To believe we may be an exception to men's violence or men's system simply because of access to money and education, is to fail to understand completely how men's violence against women operates. Money and education, in and of itself, does not protect a woman from being raped by a man, owned by a man, impregnated, beaten or killed. Fame and popularity does not protect women from being raped or killed either. Only men collectively, as a class, benefit directly from wealth, education, high economic status and fame. It directly increases their power over women, it increases the power of all men over women. They are the owners of the status. Women are never middle class, but the slaves and offspring of the slaves of middle class men.

Besides, all women are disadvantaged by this system because it divides all women. The whole point of men creating different classes of women is to create an illusion of difference in status between us so we turn against ourselves instead of men; and foster the belief of exception to patriarchy through tokenism - that it's possible to get out of it by being in the middle of its power (or something). Only the opposite is true: the closer you go to men and men's power system, the more colonised, possessed and violated you will be, both psychically and sexually. It is one of the most efficient way of killing feminism off women: to persuade that some of us aren't affected, that some of us aren't so concerned by the effects of men's violence, it's more about other women over there who have it all bad, what should we complain about it wasn't that bad for us. We're educated. We're not poor. Our parents took us for holidays. And this is a mindfark because it gives an illusion of good treatment and prevents from identifying the violence and abuse. when behind you may have been raped by your uncle or father and psychically tortured by your family for decades.
 
2014-02-01 02:05:24 PM
I never have writing papers. I already finished college. How often do you have it, Subby?
 
2014-02-01 02:05:57 PM
I bet there are "Im not paying $5 to CJ " from liters in the next 10 comments.
 
2014-02-01 02:06:12 PM
You realize this is the opposite of a well designed method to gather data, right?
 
2014-02-01 02:07:21 PM
I AM paying $5 a month to CJ AND i have lady boner meds
 
2014-02-01 02:07:27 PM
i.imgur.com
/Ifyouknowwhatimeanandithinkyoudo
 
2014-02-01 02:07:29 PM
I had sex last night with 24 people at once.  So many genitals
 
2014-02-01 02:08:04 PM
There are penis' and v-giny's errywhere
 
2014-02-01 02:08:30 PM

wizden: To believe we may be an exception to men's violence or men's system simply because of access to money and education, is to fail to understand completely how men's violence against women operates. Money and education, in and of itself, does not protect a woman from being raped by a man, owned by a man, impregnated, beaten or killed. Fame and popularity does not protect women from being raped or killed either. Only men collectively, as a class, benefit directly from wealth, education, high economic status and fame. It directly increases their power over women, it increases the power of all men over women. They are the owners of the status. Women are never middle class, but the slaves and offspring of the slaves of middle class men.

Besides, all women are disadvantaged by this system because it divides all women. The whole point of men creating different classes of women is to create an illusion of difference in status between us so we turn against ourselves instead of men; and foster the belief of exception to patriarchy through tokenism - that it's possible to get out of it by being in the middle of its power (or something). Only the opposite is true: the closer you go to men and men's power system, the more colonised, possessed and violated you will be, both psychically and sexually. It is one of the most efficient way of killing feminism off women: to persuade that some of us aren't affected, that some of us aren't so concerned by the effects of men's violence, it's more about other women over there who have it all bad, what should we complain about it wasn't that bad for us. We're educated. We're not poor. Our parents took us for holidays. And this is a mindfark because it gives an illusion of good treatment and prevents from identifying the violence and abuse. when behind you may have been raped by your uncle or father and psychically tortured by your family for decades.


It's probably a formal paper, asshole. You can't use contractions. And it's COLONIZED in God's English, you awful socialist.
 
2014-02-01 02:09:12 PM

GrahamManning: I AM paying $5 a month to CJ AND i have lady boner meds


Everyone wins!!!
 
2014-02-01 02:09:33 PM
PillPoppinPenisLovin'SatansGurl AND I WENT TO POUND TOWN.
 
2014-02-01 02:09:37 PM
2-3 times a week with the wife
 
2014-02-01 02:10:44 PM
A lot more than I do, apparently, if I would cough up the pies and cakes.
 
2014-02-01 02:10:51 PM

megarian: wizden: To believe we may be an exception to men's violence or men's system simply because of access to money and education, is to fail to understand completely how men's violence against women operates. Money and education, in and of itself, does not protect a woman from being raped by a man, owned by a man, impregnated, beaten or killed. Fame and popularity does not protect women from being raped or killed either. Only men collectively, as a class, benefit directly from wealth, education, high economic status and fame. It directly increases their power over women, it increases the power of all men over women. They are the owners of the status. Women are never middle class, but the slaves and offspring of the slaves of middle class men.

Besides, all women are disadvantaged by this system because it divides all women. The whole point of men creating different classes of women is to create an illusion of difference in status between us so we turn against ourselves instead of men; and foster the belief of exception to patriarchy through tokenism - that it's possible to get out of it by being in the middle of its power (or something). Only the opposite is true: the closer you go to men and men's power system, the more colonised, possessed and violated you will be, both psychically and sexually. It is one of the most efficient way of killing feminism off women: to persuade that some of us aren't affected, that some of us aren't so concerned by the effects of men's violence, it's more about other women over there who have it all bad, what should we complain about it wasn't that bad for us. We're educated. We're not poor. Our parents took us for holidays. And this is a mindfark because it gives an illusion of good treatment and prevents from identifying the violence and abuse. when behind you may have been raped by your uncle or father and psychically tortured by your family for decades.

It's probably a formal paper, asshole. You can't use contractions. And it's COLONIZ ...


Way to avoid the issue.

I thought I wouldn't need to take down the notion of consent in order to get my message through, but it seems that it was necessary. Because what you are saying is that if you consent to rape, it's not rape. Or if you consent to PIV, it's not rape, it's just sex. So I'll say here what I would have said if I had written an intro on consent:

First of all, consent is meaningless wrt violence. The very purpose of violence is to inflict something on you that you don't want and that's against your interest: because the point is to destroy you or use you in ways that are destructive. So it excludes, BY DEFINITION, wanting it. And you can't want your own destruction, that's impossible, you only always want what's good for you - and what men do with violence, is that they twist our brains into believing that what's bad for us is good for us.

If consent means wanting to be destroyed, then consent doesn't exist, it's a myth that men invented to revert the truth, which is that MEN WANTED us to submit to their PIV.

The other option is that consent is just a synonym for submission, but that again makes the term meaningless since it can't include the notion of choice, which goes against the term consent.

the second thing is that violence is NEVER measured or qualified according to what the victim did or thought, but according to what the perpetrator DID. Violence is objective. What defines violence is the presence / reality of violence, not how the victim reacted to it, or how she behaved before the perpetrator did it.
 
2014-02-01 02:11:00 PM

rostit: I had sex last night with 24 people at once.  So many genitals


I don't have enough orifices for that.
 
2014-02-01 02:11:14 PM
2-3 times a week with silgryphons wife
 
2014-02-01 02:11:32 PM
Last time was around aught-two.
 
2014-02-01 02:11:53 PM

socially inept was taken: rostit: I had sex last night with 24 people at once.  So many genitals

I don't have enough orifices for that.


neither did I....at first
 
2014-02-01 02:12:09 PM
I'm getting laid right now!
 
2014-02-01 02:13:16 PM

wizden: the second thing is that violence is NEVER measured or qualified according to what the victim did or thought, but according to what the perpetrator DID. Violence is objective. What defines violence is the presence / reality of violence, not how the victim reacted to it, or how she behaved before the perpetrator did it.


Wait, I thought this was about wanking in on-line forums.
 
2014-02-01 02:13:17 PM
How often do I have to write papers about online forums and their sex lives?? WTF?!?
 
2014-02-01 02:14:25 PM
He finally stopped caring about cell phones during sex, so now you'll get a daily "i'm getting laid, what are you doing?" thread instead of my usual.
 
2014-02-01 02:16:26 PM
I try to write a good paper at least once a month. Next month... "The effect of asking personal questions on online forums." I hope you all enjoy it.
 
2014-02-01 02:16:27 PM
I have sex with cell phones.
 
2014-02-01 02:17:17 PM

wizden: megarian: wizden: To believe we may be an exception to men's violence or men's system simply because of access to money and education, is to fail to understand completely how men's violence against women operates. Money and education, in and of itself, does not protect a woman from being raped by a man, owned by a man, impregnated, beaten or killed. Fame and popularity does not protect women from being raped or killed either. Only men collectively, as a class, benefit directly from wealth, education, high economic status and fame. It directly increases their power over women, it increases the power of all men over women. They are the owners of the status. Women are never middle class, but the slaves and offspring of the slaves of middle class men.

Besides, all women are disadvantaged by this system because it divides all women. The whole point of men creating different classes of women is to create an illusion of difference in status between us so we turn against ourselves instead of men; and foster the belief of exception to patriarchy through tokenism - that it's possible to get out of it by being in the middle of its power (or something). Only the opposite is true: the closer you go to men and men's power system, the more colonised, possessed and violated you will be, both psychically and sexually. It is one of the most efficient way of killing feminism off women: to persuade that some of us aren't affected, that some of us aren't so concerned by the effects of men's violence, it's more about other women over there who have it all bad, what should we complain about it wasn't that bad for us. We're educated. We're not poor. Our parents took us for holidays. And this is a mindfark because it gives an illusion of good treatment and prevents from identifying the violence and abuse. when behind you may have been raped by your uncle or father and psychically tortured by your family for decades.

It's probably a formal paper, asshole. You can't use contractions. And it ...


Nice strawman. First of all, the use of "male" and "female" are CLEARLY oppressive terms that fail to recognize what we all know: gender is a purely social construct that has nothing to do with biology or sexual dimorphism. To refer to plugs as "male" and sockets as "female" reinforces a hetero-normative culture where people can't just decide what gender they are based on their feelings, which we all know is the true determinant of gender. What if a person with XX chromosomes feels like a boy....THEN OBVIOUSLY SHE IS! Guys it makes me cry that I have to point this out. Wow, just wow. Why does everything that penetrates need to be referred to as "male" anyway? We all know lesbians use strap-ons and penetrate each other, and they're definitely female! What about women who peg men, which our hero Hugo Schwyzer taught us is the way to put men in their place? You know, when he wasn't busy banging his students and drunk-driving? Calling the penetrat-y, rape-y part "male" is like, SO outdated you guys! Just wow.
 
2014-02-01 02:17:41 PM
whenever I feel like it. I have a vagina.  It has magical powers.
 
2014-02-01 02:19:02 PM
A few times a week.
 
2014-02-01 02:19:07 PM
I probably should have read that copy pasta.
 
Displayed 50 of 233 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report