If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Salon)   Pornographic studio tries to satisfy customer demands for condomless porn by digitally removing condoms in post-production. Perhaps they could get George Lucas to help them   (salon.com) divider line 19
    More: Interesting, sex educations, Axel Braun, sexual freedom, George Lucas  
•       •       •

5534 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Jan 2014 at 8:59 PM (33 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-01-25 09:08:14 PM
4 votes:
Wouldnt this be super easy if they just planned ahead and used a green or blue condom?
2014-01-25 09:36:19 PM
2 votes:
Do condoms really bother porn viewers? REALLY? Because I'm not looking at the condom-wrapped member at all. And when it's IN the girl, you can't see it most of the time anyway, so it's not like the condoms are obstruction your view of manly meat if that's your cuppa.

So really, this HAS to be a non-issue. I can't believe this is something that drives away porn viewers.
2014-01-26 09:23:28 AM
1 votes:
I'm glad that somebody finally noted that the proponents of condom use in porn really do not give a damn about the actors, but are intensely interested in "raising public awareness" (a phrase used almost exclusively by scoundrels), to encourage condom use.

A useful note there.  If someone ever uses the phrase "raising public awareness" to you, no matter the subject, you now know that they are a scoundrel, and want control over others.
2014-01-26 03:15:21 AM
1 votes:

lewismarktwo: The reason people don't want to see a condom is because they've worn them shiats and no matter what some people say it does NOT feel as good as 'bareback'*.

*which is farking stupid farking term


True. Condoms suck and I don't want to see them in a fantasy. It's really that simple. The great thing about porn/erotica is that you can vicariously experience all the crazy sex you'll never get to have yourself. Ooh, condoms. How exotic.
2014-01-26 12:42:05 AM
1 votes:

dababler: MattyBlast: Nah...George Lucas would just add CGI beaks coming out of every woman's vagina.

Falcon makes gay porn.



You came in that thing? Your braver than I thought.
2014-01-25 11:58:30 PM
1 votes:

Scorpitron is reduced to a thin red paste: elguerodiablo: MattyBlast: Nah...George Lucas would just add CGI beaks coming out of every woman's vagina.

[img.fark.net image 648x596]

Is that real? I haven't bothered with Star Wars in twenty years. It looks stupid.


Yep, and it's not the only sin Lucas committed - he basically filled the movie with CGI additions, replacements, and so on. Pissed all over it.
2014-01-25 11:31:39 PM
1 votes:

elguerodiablo: MattyBlast: Nah...George Lucas would just add CGI beaks coming out of every woman's vagina.

[img.fark.net image 648x596]


Is that real? I haven't bothered with Star Wars in twenty years. It looks stupid.
2014-01-25 11:10:10 PM
1 votes:

ZeroCorpse: And maybe the decline in sales has more to do with the widespread, freely available porn on the Internet? Why would people continue buying videos when they're posted on 4tube, youporn, etc. for free?


But the freely available porn on the net has typically been condom free until now. The stuff from Vivid in the early to mid 90s was almost all condom unless the performers were an item. Once anybody with a website could start filming "You shat on my daughter, now shiat on me 12" condoms had to go away. Which was largely fine until 2013 turned into the year of "hey look at the performer with the AIDS".
2014-01-25 10:07:35 PM
1 votes:

ZeroCorpse: Do condoms really bother porn viewers? REALLY? Because I'm not looking at the condom-wrapped member at all. And when it's IN the girl, you can't see it most of the time anyway, so it's not like the condoms are obstruction your view of manly meat if that's your cuppa.

So really, this HAS to be a non-issue. I can't believe this is something that drives away porn viewers.


Not all heterosexual men find male genitalia icky to look at.

/cue Seth Rogen and Paul Rudd
2014-01-25 10:03:21 PM
1 votes:
I only watch lesbian porn so I didn't even know the condom thing was an issue.
2014-01-25 10:00:53 PM
1 votes:

Taima: ZeroCorpse: Do condoms really bother porn viewers? REALLY? Because I'm not looking at the condom-wrapped member at all. And when it's IN the girl, you can't see it most of the time anyway, so it's not like the condoms are obstruction your view of manly meat if that's your cuppa.

So really, this HAS to be a non-issue. I can't believe this is something that drives away porn viewers.

Maybe not so much in straight porn, but definitely in gay porn.

/it's a stupid law.
//just meant to get rid of the porn industry, they really couldn't care less about the safety of the models.


Yes and no. These whack jobs (sorry) honestly, truly believe in their heart of hearts that people who watch condom porn are going to use condoms in real life. The fact that they're utterly and completely wrong seems to elude them. But yes, it does really seem to be a weird end around (sorry again) to basically ban porn.

Personally, the few condom scenes I've watched, the condom seems a little tight and a little painful. Bareback just looks better; better movement, deeper penetration, and moister pubis. It's not a deal breaker, but I prefer bareback.
2014-01-25 09:49:38 PM
1 votes:

ZeroCorpse: Do condoms really bother porn viewers? REALLY? Because I'm not looking at the condom-wrapped member at all. And when it's IN the girl, you can't see it most of the time anyway, so it's not like the condoms are obstruction your view of manly meat if that's your cuppa.

So really, this HAS to be a non-issue. I can't believe this is something that drives away porn viewers.


Maybe not so much in straight porn, but definitely in gay porn.

/it's a stupid law.
//just meant to get rid of the porn industry, they really couldn't care less about the safety of the models.
2014-01-25 09:47:58 PM
1 votes:
"Bareback sex represents hypermasculinity, risk, and sexual freedom and constitutes a unique sexual identity. If a performer or viewer knows a scene or video has been shot while performers were wearing condoms, the thrill, danger, and very meaning of bareback sex have been blunted."

Uh, yeah. Sure. Psychoanalyze it all you want, some of us just don't like the way it looks.
2014-01-25 09:20:43 PM
1 votes:
Stephen Spielberg would replace all the penises with walkie talkies.

George Lucas would leave the condoms but replace all the broads with ghosts of racially insensitive caricatures.

Michael Bay would figure out a way to make the story and dialogue in the porn even worse but he would make great looking explosions.
2014-01-25 09:16:53 PM
1 votes:
Man, the porn industry is a sad relic.
2014-01-25 09:08:41 PM
1 votes:
Just have every porno be science fiction.  "Here I am putting on my space age 'Inviso-condom'.  Now that that's taken care of..."
2014-01-25 09:08:19 PM
1 votes:
...or they could just shoot in a jurisdiction that doesn't require condoms to be used.
2014-01-25 08:54:54 PM
1 votes:
Han spooged first?
2014-01-25 08:44:21 PM
1 votes:
The technology still needs work

/looks a little prixelated
 
Displayed 19 of 19 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report