buckler: Animated property defacement. It'd be great if he put his obvious talent to some useful purpose.
jfivealive: Absolute defacement of property. Talk about decreasing property values. Noone in the entire history of man has ever been able to deliver an artistic message by coloring a building. (Most idiots cant hack even light artistry. Noone got everything living obtusely.) You'd be better off spending your time out looking for a real job, but no, you'd rather be a common vandal.
Spanky McStupid: Had to check that this was not a featured partner.
DRTFA: 1) Isn't that a labor-intensive way to make a GIF? I'd think Photoshop would yield the same result.2) The Photoshop method would use a lot less paint, which is more eco-friendly, if you care about such things.3) If I was an artist of any sort, I would not use my name in EVERY piece of "art" I created.
Ker_Thwap: I'm not epileptic, but those were just annoying. Probably should include a warning.
If you like these links, you'll love
Come on, it's $5 a month, just do it.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 13 2017 07:23:09
Runtime: 0.223 sec (223 ms)