Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Seventy-year-old man has spent 43 years locked up in psychiatric hospital for. A) Rape B) Murder C) Stealing a necklace worth $20   (dailymail.co.uk ) divider line
    More: Asinine, John Hinckley, first-to-file, Washington Hospital Center, Ronald Reagan, psychiatric institution  
•       •       •

10385 clicks; posted to Main » on 24 Jan 2014 at 3:02 AM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



73 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-01-24 12:37:57 AM  
There will be certain people in here calling it the DailyFail despite them shining light on this.

I foresee all
 
2014-01-24 01:02:40 AM  

cman: I foresee all


The fore-cman.
 
2014-01-24 01:29:02 AM  
I'll bet he won't do that again
 
2014-01-24 02:23:16 AM  
d) being farking crazy
 
2014-01-24 03:00:16 AM  

cman: There will be certain people in here calling it the DailyFail despite them shining light on this.

I foresee all


the Washington Times - which broke the story about Mr. Frye after reviewing his case and federal court records

The National Enquirer also sometimes runs actual journalism in between bat boy's dates with lady big foot.
 
2014-01-24 03:01:33 AM  
I will instantly stop whatever I'm doing and start furiously masturbating the day I read a headline like this where the answer is A or B.
 
2014-01-24 03:03:36 AM  

Marmilman: I will instantly stop whatever I'm doing and start furiously masturbating the day I read a headline like this where the answer is A or B.


You have an odd fetish, my friend.
 
2014-01-24 03:04:30 AM  
You wouldn't download a necklace...
 
2014-01-24 03:06:09 AM  

robohobo: You wouldn't download a necklace...


About that....
 
2014-01-24 03:09:00 AM  

doglover: cman: There will be certain people in here calling it the DailyFail despite them shining light on this.

I foresee all

the Washington Times - which broke the story about Mr. Frye after reviewing his case and federal court records

The National Enquirer also sometimes runs actual journalism in between bat boy's dates with lady big foot.


So when there is an external source that has information that one agrees with, its not the DailyFail.

Thanks for the elaboration
 
2014-01-24 03:12:34 AM  
He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. That's why he's stuck in a mental institution.

You mess with the bull, you get the horns.
 
2014-01-24 03:12:56 AM  
Is he still criminally insane?
 
2014-01-24 03:15:03 AM  

AverageAmericanGuy: He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. That's why he's stuck in a mental institution.

You mess with the bull, you get the horns.


And was released after his first 2 years, but was readmitted for..... (reason not given).

There's probably more to the story that they're not printing.
 
2014-01-24 03:17:06 AM  

GrailOfThunder: AverageAmericanGuy: He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. That's why he's stuck in a mental institution.

You mess with the bull, you get the horns.

And was released after his first 2 years, but was readmitted for..... (reason not given).

There's probably more to the story that they're not printing.


God damn it

Now I am starting to agree with the DailyFail tag
 
2014-01-24 03:18:08 AM  
Well, is he not insane after 40 years in an instituion?
 
2014-01-24 03:19:48 AM  
Sure it's minor and seemingly absurd, but the necklace theft and conviction likely served us all by getting this nut off the streets and out of our hair.

/ there's a reason McMurphy's decision to fake being crazy was a terrible one (besides the lobotomy)
// you leave when they say you leave
 
2014-01-24 03:20:30 AM  

cman: GrailOfThunder: AverageAmericanGuy: He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. That's why he's stuck in a mental institution.

You mess with the bull, you get the horns.

And was released after his first 2 years, but was readmitted for..... (reason not given).

There's probably more to the story that they're not printing.

God damn it

Now I am starting to agree with the DailyFail tag


They've been repeatedly shown to just flat out making up stories. There was one where they reported that a dentist removed all of her ex-boyfriends teeth. Later, when there was no evidence of this like a arrest report or a court case, or her license being revoked, did they admit they 'got it off the internet'.
 
2014-01-24 03:23:59 AM  
Franklin Franklin, bo-Banklin,
Banana-fana fo-Ranklin,
Fe-Fi mo Manklin,
Franklin!
 
2014-01-24 03:25:06 AM  
DNRTFA

Was it a Pearl Necklace?
 
2014-01-24 03:25:40 AM  
The case wasn't transferred to a judge who is still breathing until the last few weeks.

o_O

[reads sentence again]

O_o

F*cking zombie judges...
 
2014-01-24 03:30:37 AM  

thatboyoverthere: They've been repeatedly shown to just flat out making up stories. There was one where they reported that a dentist removed all of her ex-boyfriends teeth. Later, when there was no evidence of this like a arrest report or a court case, or her license being revoked, did they admit they 'got it off the internet'.


The bit about him getting into fights until the last few years is sort of a tip-off as well... Of course I am no expert, but if a patient were sane and trying to get released, I sort of doubt fighting over clothes would be part of his plan.
 
2014-01-24 03:32:59 AM  
Of course the real issue is this: Would it even be a good thing to do, to release a 70-year old man, who has been in the hospital for over 40 years, out into society? Does he even want to go? I mean, I'm sure he "wants" to go, in the same way a child "wants" to run away and live in a treehouse; but could this old man actually survive without massive amounts of help? Wouldn't it be kinder just to let him stay in the hospital at this point, and perhaps let him have free access in and out if he wants to go?

I've seen heavily institutionalized people who are released because the civil rights lawyers seem to think it would be a good thing (because freedom and civil rights and America); and it is NEVER a good thing. Sure it would be better in the abstract for this obviously wronged man to have his rights restored; but insofar as his welfare is concerned, releasing him would guarantee the next headline would be "71-year old former mental patient found dead behind soup kitchen."
 
2014-01-24 03:36:05 AM  

ladyfortuna: thatboyoverthere: They've been repeatedly shown to just flat out making up stories. There was one where they reported that a dentist removed all of her ex-boyfriends teeth. Later, when there was no evidence of this like a arrest report or a court case, or her license being revoked, did they admit they 'got it off the internet'.

The bit about him getting into fights until the last few years is sort of a tip-off as well... Of course I am no expert, but if a patient were sane and trying to get released, I sort of doubt fighting over clothes would be part of his plan.


People steal from one another. If you don't defend your stuff, you'll be walked on.. like Miley Cyrus or Amanda Bynes
 
2014-01-24 03:37:11 AM  

diaphoresis: like Miley Cyrus or Amanda Bynes


I don't even...
 
2014-01-24 03:45:54 AM  

cman: GrailOfThunder: AverageAmericanGuy: He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. That's why he's stuck in a mental institution.

You mess with the bull, you get the horns.

And was released after his first 2 years, but was readmitted for..... (reason not given).

There's probably more to the story that they're not printing.

God damn it

Now I am starting to agree with the DailyFail tag


Oh get real seamen, you swallow everything you want... to agree with.
 
2014-01-24 03:54:17 AM  
On the bright side, we can be fairly certain he hasn't raped and/or murdered anyone in the last 43 years.

The system works.
 
2014-01-24 03:55:02 AM  

cman: doglover: cman: There will be certain people in here calling it the DailyFail despite them shining light on this.

I foresee all

the Washington Times - which broke the story about Mr. Frye after reviewing his case and federal court records

The National Enquirer also sometimes runs actual journalism in between bat boy's dates with lady big foot.

So when there is an external source that has information that one agrees with, its not the DailyFail.

Thanks for the elaboration


No, it's the Daily Fail because it often runs false and misleading stories as real news. The occasional true story copied from elsewhere doesn't improve their integrity at all.
 
2014-01-24 03:57:11 AM  

wildcardjack: Well, is he not insane after 40 years in an instituion?


Touché, and we're done here.
 
2014-01-24 03:59:08 AM  

cman: There will be certain people in here calling it the DailyFail despite them shining light on this.

I foresee all


Shining light on what? That insane people are committed to mental institutions?

The necklace is just submitter trolling for a greenlight.
 
2014-01-24 04:00:40 AM  
This was obviously the correct judicial decision. Think of the number of necklaces that have gone unstolen as a result, over the past 40 years. It must number in the thousands.
 
2014-01-24 04:12:56 AM  
It would have been better for him to live the last 40y as a homeless panhandler perhaps?
 
2014-01-24 04:17:27 AM  
Can't we lock Bieber up for 40 years in a mental institution?
 
2014-01-24 04:24:09 AM  

SickAsAParrot: Can't we lock Bieber up for 40 years in a mental institution?


The fans are worse off. We should start with them.
 
2014-01-24 05:01:25 AM  
They told me Ronald Reagan took all the crazies out of institutions and put them on the streets.

Was that a lie?
 
2014-01-24 05:03:07 AM  
CSB: A goth friend of mine posted personal pictures of herself on Livejournal. The Daily Mail found the pictures and posted them in a story about rowdy British teenagers. My friend had no connection to the story, doesn't even live in the UK, and certainly didn't give them permission to use her photos.

DailyFail, indeed.
 
2014-01-24 05:06:14 AM  

zepillin: They told me Ronald Reagan took all the crazies out of institutions and put them on the streets.

Was that a lie?


I thought it was Bush or Clinton. Well, it might have been Bush II. No, wait, it was Obama. Thank Obama for all the crazies on the streets.
 
2014-01-24 05:21:53 AM  

Gyrfalcon: Of course the real issue is this: Would it even be a good thing to do, to release a 70-year old man, who has been in the hospital for over 40 years, out into society? Does he even want to go? I mean, I'm sure he "wants" to go, in the same way a child "wants" to run away and live in a treehouse; but could this old man actually survive without massive amounts of help? Wouldn't it be kinder just to let him stay in the hospital at this point, and perhaps let him have free access in and out if he wants to go?

I've seen heavily institutionalized people who are released because the civil rights lawyers seem to think it would be a good thing (because freedom and civil rights and America); and it is NEVER a good thing. Sure it would be better in the abstract for this obviously wronged man to have his rights restored; but insofar as his welfare is concerned, releasing him would guarantee the next headline would be "71-year old former mental patient found dead behind soup kitchen."


zzrhardy: It would have been better for him to live the last 40y as a homeless panhandler perhaps?


The nail with the hammer, youse hits it.
 
2014-01-24 05:22:48 AM  

cman: Now I am starting to agree with the DailyFail tag


Or, Daily Heil:

i.imgur.com

Axana: CSB: A goth friend of mine posted personal pictures of herself on Livejournal. The Daily Mail found the pictures and posted them in a story about rowdy British teenagers. My friend had no connection to the story, doesn't even live in the UK, and certainly didn't give them permission to use her photos.

DailyFail, indeed.


Yeah, they used to run images from b3ta.com's photoshop competitions without attribution too.

Bunch of dicks.
 
2014-01-24 05:23:19 AM  

wildcardjack: Well, is he not insane after 40 years in an instituion?


Came here to say this.

You can be the healthiest person on earth and admitted into a hospital for a very minor reason.

The day they place you next to someone who is terminal and moans 24/7 like something out of a horror movie, I guarantee you will catch one of the bugs floating around the hospital, or at the very least, take forever to feel better.


/If you say Obamacare I will shoot you
 
2014-01-24 05:33:15 AM  

zepillin: They told me Ronald Reagan took all the crazies out of institutions and put them on the streets.

Was that a lie?


a half truth.

Reagan put all the crazies out on the street...where they could be arrested for doing the things that crazy people do.
 
2014-01-24 05:41:27 AM  
img.fark.net

/disapproves
 
2014-01-24 05:46:10 AM  
All those words but no mention of why he was in there.  (It wasn't about the necklace and "insanity" is a hell of a broad brush.)
 
2014-01-24 05:50:23 AM  

phrawgh: zepillin: They told me Ronald Reagan took all the crazies out of institutions and put them on the streets.

Was that a lie?

I thought it was Bush or Clinton. Well, it might have been Bush II. No, wait, it was Obama. Thank Obama for all the crazies on the streets.


I was none of them. It was the ACLU.

From This Link

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), in July 2008, issued a "Report on Mental Health Issues at Los Angeles County Jail." The report decried the increasing number of severely mentally ill inmates in the jail and the lack of treatment available to them.

This report is remarkable primarily for its hypocrisy. It was, after all, the New York chapter of the ACLU that sponsored the initial mental health project run by lawyer Bruce J. Ennis. Ennis wrote that the goal of the ACLU program "should be nothing less than the abolition of involuntary hospitalization." Ennis and other representatives of the ACLU played a major role in shutting down most state psychiatric hospitals and in blocking all attempts to treat patients who do not know they are sick. For examples, in New York City, when then mayor Ed Koch tried to involuntarily hospitalize obviously psychotic homeless individuals, it was the ACLU that went to court and blocked his efforts.
So after doing everything possible to empty public psychiatric hospitals and then blocking all attempts to treat the discharged patients who were unaware of their psychiatric illness, here comes the ACLU decrying the fact that many of these untreated discharged patients have ended up in jail. It is like the small boy who intentionally breaks his toys and then blames others for doing so.

If there is a national prize for hypocrisy, the ACLU deserves serious consideration as a recipient.

Also read Uncivil Liberties, the best article on this subject


Anyone who would like more reading on the subject just Google 'ACLU closed mental hospitals'
 
2014-01-24 05:50:57 AM  

BumpInTheNight: All those words but no mention of why he was in there.  (It wasn't about the necklace and "insanity" is a hell of a broad brush.)


"Franklin H. Frye was sent to the psychiatric wing of St. Elizabeth's Hospital in 1971 after he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for stealing the necklace. "

pretty straight forward to me.
 
2014-01-24 06:12:06 AM  

doglover: cman: There will be certain people in here calling it the DailyFail despite them shining light on this.

I foresee all

the Washington Times - which broke the story about Mr. Frye after reviewing his case and federal court records

The National Enquirer also sometimes runs actual journalism in between bat boy's dates with lady big foot.


I thought those stories were from Weekly World News.
 
2014-01-24 06:40:41 AM  
Franklin H. Frye was sent to the psychiatric wing of St. Elizabeth's Hospital in 1971 after he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for stealing the necklace.

Now that's just crazy.
 
2014-01-24 06:49:27 AM  

GrailOfThunder: AverageAmericanGuy: He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. That's why he's stuck in a mental institution.

You mess with the bull, you get the horns.

And was released after his first 2 years, but was readmitted for..... (reason not given).

There's probably more to the story that they're not printing.


Sort of.  Sent to a halfway house, where he violated some rule and went back.

#1 reason for stay: No family support.
 
2014-01-24 07:15:43 AM  
I'll just leave this here.

s24.postimg.org
 
2014-01-24 07:20:15 AM  
How did I know it would. Be a black man in the Land of the Free (TM).
 
2014-01-24 07:21:11 AM  
How did I know it would be a lack man in the Land of the Free (TM)?
 
2014-01-24 07:42:19 AM  
How did I know it would be a wack man in the Land of the Free (TM)?
 
2014-01-24 08:04:58 AM  
News flash: Pleading insanity is not a get out of jail free card.

This doesn't happen:
Judge: You are accused of stealing a necklace. How do you plead, yo?
Guy: Pancakes! Dildo in a tiger!
Judge: Oh, I see. Well in that case you're free to go. Have a good day!

You get aquitted by reason of insanity, and you're going to be doing the same amount of time (if not more!) at a crazy house. If you are so crazy that you can't stop yourself from commiting crimes, they really don't want you wandering about.
 
2014-01-24 08:13:48 AM  

HindiDiscoMonster: log_jammin: d) being farking crazy

that's better... only 4 posts in... you have restored my faith in Fark log monster...


I knew there would be more to the story.  I was expecting the rest to be:
 C) Stealing a necklace worth $20 from one of the hookers in his freezer.
 
2014-01-24 08:15:25 AM  

log_jammin: zepillin: They told me Ronald Reagan took all the crazies out of institutions and put them on the streets.

Was that a lie?

a half truth.

Reagan put all the crazies out on the street...where they could be arrested for doing the things that crazy people do.


One-eighth truth:  Reagan was at the very tail end of the deinstitutionalization trend:

www-tc.pbs.org

He gets the blame for something that happened mostly under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Carter.
 
2014-01-24 08:22:20 AM  

dittybopper: log_jammin: zepillin: They told me Ronald Reagan took all the crazies out of institutions and put them on the streets.

Was that a lie?

a half truth.

Reagan put all the crazies out on the street...where they could be arrested for doing the things that crazy people do.

One-eighth truth:  Reagan was at the very tail end of the deinstitutionalization trend:

[www-tc.pbs.org image 320x290]

He gets the blame for something that happened mostly under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Carter.


Fortunately, we have all learned from this.
 
2014-01-24 08:29:56 AM  
That's what he gets for not being a famous actress.
 
2014-01-24 08:32:39 AM  
No longer profitable to house?
 
2014-01-24 08:43:13 AM  
dittybopper: One-eighth truth:  Reagan was at the very tail end of the deinstitutionalization trend:


disturbing graph


He gets the blame for something that happened mostly under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Carter.

So in a nation of 165 million we had better than a half a million in mental institutions?
 
2014-01-24 08:51:26 AM  
phrawgh


. Thank Obama for all the crazies on the streets.
You've got that backwards. You can thank all the crazies on the streets for obama.
 
2014-01-24 09:07:44 AM  
Incarceration of any type is more about forcing compliance than helping the individual.
The ego trips of the 'authority' figures, corruption for funding and kickbacks for medications take priority.
He was most likely driven crazy by being institutionalized.
 
2014-01-24 09:11:41 AM  
How did I know it would be a Mac man in the land of the PC(TM)?
 
2014-01-24 09:21:36 AM  

Gyrfalcon: Of course the real issue is this: Would it even be a good thing to do, to release a 70-year old man, who has been in the hospital for over 40 years, out into society? Does he even want to go? I mean, I'm sure he "wants" to go, in the same way a child "wants" to run away and live in a treehouse; but could this old man actually survive without massive amounts of help? Wouldn't it be kinder just to let him stay in the hospital at this point, and perhaps let him have free access in and out if he wants to go?

I've seen heavily institutionalized people who are released because the civil rights lawyers seem to think it would be a good thing (because freedom and civil rights and America); and it is NEVER a good thing. Sure it would be better in the abstract for this obviously wronged man to have his rights restored; but insofar as his welfare is concerned, releasing him would guarantee the next headline would be "71-year old former mental patient found dead behind soup kitchen."




I'm afraid you're right.
 
2014-01-24 09:38:51 AM  

pete1729: dittybopper: One-eighth truth:  Reagan was at the very tail end of the deinstitutionalization trend:


disturbing graph


He gets the blame for something that happened mostly under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Carter.

So in a nation of 165 million we had better than a half a million in mental institutions?


According to a quick Google search, most of that population was made up of homeless people and senior citizens who couldn't take care of themselves (or didn't have a family able or willing to do it for them).
 
2014-01-24 10:51:40 AM  

GrailOfThunder: pete1729: dittybopper: One-eighth truth:  Reagan was at the very tail end of the deinstitutionalization trend:


disturbing graph


He gets the blame for something that happened mostly under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Carter.

So in a nation of 165 million we had better than a half a million in mental institutions?

According to a quick Google search, most of that population was made up of homeless people and senior citizens who couldn't take care of themselves (or didn't have a family able or willing to do it for them).


Also, people with autism, mental retardation (including Down's), and possibly also some conditions that aren't really even mental issues, like cerebral palsy.  Back then, if you had a child with mental disabilities, the standard recommendation from the medical profession was to institutionalize them.
 
2014-01-24 11:47:03 AM  

Astorix: Gyrfalcon: Of course the real issue is this: Would it even be a good thing to do, to release a 70-year old man, who has been in the hospital for over 40 years, out into society? Does he even want to go? I mean, I'm sure he "wants" to go, in the same way a child "wants" to run away and live in a treehouse; but could this old man actually survive without massive amounts of help? Wouldn't it be kinder just to let him stay in the hospital at this point, and perhaps let him have free access in and out if he wants to go?

I've seen heavily institutionalized people who are released because the civil rights lawyers seem to think it would be a good thing (because freedom and civil rights and America); and it is NEVER a good thing. Sure it would be better in the abstract for this obviously wronged man to have his rights restored; but insofar as his welfare is concerned, releasing him would guarantee the next headline would be "71-year old former mental patient found dead behind soup kitchen."

I'm afraid you're right.


The best part is, either way, the left gets what it wants: More "Proof" The USA Is Irredeemably Evil And Must Be Destroyed.

/and once the USA is gone, they'll take on reality itself
//and all because they shut down the functioning rehab system
///bonus: and managed to pin the blame on Reagan
 
2014-01-24 12:10:04 PM  
To be honest, it was a really ugly necklace
 
2014-01-24 12:17:58 PM  
Yes, but being committed for mental treatment is not punishment.

/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_v._Hendricks
// "Further, the court decided the Act does not violate the Constitution's double jeopardy prohibition nor the ban on ex post-facto law because the Act does not establish criminal proceedings and therefore involuntary confinement under it is not punishment."
 
2014-01-24 01:34:48 PM  

illannoyin: phrawgh: zepillin: They told me Ronald Reagan took all the crazies out of institutions and put them on the streets.

Was that a lie?

I thought it was Bush or Clinton. Well, it might have been Bush II. No, wait, it was Obama. Thank Obama for all the crazies on the streets.

I was none of them. It was the ACLU.

From This Link

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), in July 2008, issued a "Report on Mental Health Issues at Los Angeles County Jail." The report decried the increasing number of severely mentally ill inmates in the jail and the lack of treatment available to them.

This report is remarkable primarily for its hypocrisy. It was, after all, the New York chapter of the ACLU that sponsored the initial mental health project run by lawyer Bruce J. Ennis. Ennis wrote that the goal of the ACLU program "should be nothing less than the abolition of involuntary hospitalization." Ennis and other representatives of the ACLU played a major role in shutting down most state psychiatric hospitals and in blocking all attempts to treat patients who do not know they are sick. For examples, in New York City, when then mayor Ed Koch tried to involuntarily hospitalize obviously psychotic homeless individuals, it was the ACLU that went to court and blocked his efforts.
So after doing everything possible to empty public psychiatric hospitals and then blocking all attempts to treat the discharged patients who were unaware of their psychiatric illness, here comes the ACLU decrying the fact that many of these untreated discharged patients have ended up in jail. It is like the small boy who intentionally breaks his toys and then blames others for doing so.

If there is a national prize for hypocrisy, the ACLU deserves serious consideration as a recipient.

Also read Uncivil Liberties, the best article on this subject


Anyone who would like more reading on the subject just Google 'ACLU closed mental hospitals'


Seriously?  If there's a most-valued civil liberty (though implied, not express) it's Freedom of Movement. An *INVOLUNTARY* mass-roundup has no place in our society. The ACLU was doing its job.

Hypocrisy is people complaining about the homeless but refusing to actually help them, stuff like w/ denying a single payer national health care system.
 
2014-01-24 04:06:33 PM  

Rising_Zan_Samurai_Gunman: Back then, if you had a child with mental disabilities, the standard recommendation from the medical profession was to institutionalize them.


Even if all they wanted was a Pepsi...

25.media.tumblr.com
 
2014-01-24 04:37:49 PM  

skinink: Franklin Franklin, bo-Banklin,
Banana-fana fo-Ranklin,
Fe-Fi mo Manklin,
Franklin!


That surreal "Name Game" sequence in the insane asylum was one of my favorite scenes in American Horror Story.

/It's a pretty amazing series, definitely worthy of binge-watching.
 
2014-01-25 12:03:48 AM  

dittybopper: One-eighth truth: Reagan was at the very tail end of the deinstitutionalization trend:

He gets the blame for something that happened mostly under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Carter.


One could make the argument that with the development of antipsychotic drugs many didn't have to be institutionalized anymore, sort of like how advanced medical care is reducing the number of people who are blind, deaf, missing limbs, etc...  You don't need as many schools for the blind/deaf if you're able to fix 3/4 of them so they can see/hear.

What that could lead to was that under Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and Carter you saw a steady reduction of the number in asylums because they could finally be treated and released.  What happened under Reagon was an unprecedented shutdown of the institutions, kicking those that couldn't yet be treated onto the street.
 
2014-01-25 12:54:57 AM  
Guy de Maupassant has his sequel.
 
2014-01-25 01:36:13 PM  
They're quoting from his own motions for release and from his lawyers.  The hospital hasn't made any move to support or contribute to his release, after each yearly review, except for the first conditional release which ended for reasons not mentioned.

It does seem bad on the surface, but it isn't supposed to be about the original crime.  That has little to do with whether a person is treatable at all, or whether they've recovered.  Mental illness doesn't abide by what seems 'fair'.  There is a ton missing here about how he came to plead insanity over something like that, and get the court to agree.  The hospital isn't going to be able to say a lot about why they do not make any motions for his release.  He could release more info, if it would help, but it appears he hasn't.  None of the relevant info is in the articles at all.

The delays in the court system do sound like a more definite problem though, but not the one the article seems to be trying to bring attention to.
 
Displayed 73 of 73 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter








In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report