If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Mirror.co.uk)   Good news for Brits: Ghost ship that's been adrift in the North Atlantic for the past year and crewed entirely by a hungry cabal of cannibal rats could be heading straight for you. ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR   (mirror.co.uk) divider line 74
    More: Weird, ghost ships, ghosts, Britain, cannibal rats, Newfoundland, Canada, rats  
•       •       •

9451 clicks; posted to Main » on 23 Jan 2014 at 9:56 AM (35 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



74 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2014-01-23 01:11:09 PM
.

I really don't get why the Canadians didn't sink it when they had a chance. Isn't this the normal course, given that it's a hazard adrift? IIRC they sunk some Japanese fishing trawlers that were headed their way after the earthquake. It almost seems like they opened themselves up to be sued if anyone gets hurt or has property damage from this vessel they just set adrift.
 
2014-01-23 01:19:16 PM
Someone help me out here. I have recollections of a story or movie where the bad guy is telling the good guy that he taught rats on an island to eat each other to keep the rats under control and I haven't the faintest idea what it was? Vague memories of Bond though if that helps.
 
2014-01-23 01:46:23 PM

Medic Zero: .

I really don't get why the Canadians didn't sink it when they had a chance. Isn't this the normal course, given that it's a hazard adrift? IIRC they sunk some Japanese fishing trawlers that were headed their way after the earthquake. It almost seems like they opened themselves up to be sued if anyone gets hurt or has property damage from this vessel they just set adrift.


Because the boat is most definitely moving away from Canada, in international waters, and will never come back. It's not their problem and never will be again.
 
2014-01-23 01:49:48 PM

Kozmopoliskepticalopsis: Reminds me of this:

Three Skeleton Key

This scarred me for life as a child. (and scared me too)


That's a terrific short story.
 
2014-01-23 02:04:56 PM

Watubi: stuhayes2010: Brick-House: Hello????

[news.xinhuanet.com image 850x510]

Worth $600,000 in scrap, they ain't sinking it.

And, how much would you spend on lawyers to claim the rights to salvage it?  Unfortunately, the case of finders vs keepers doesn't apply in this situation.  Add in the cost of towing too.  If it was a profitable venture, Canada wouldn't have set it adrift.


Well, "finder's keepers" is *kind of* a valid legal premise, if I remember the law of abandonment from Law School.

Basically, the "finder" would have to convince a judge that the property was abandoned (really just meaning "left somewhere") and that the original owner intended to abandon it.

So the question here is whether the dock that cut it loose was acting on behalf of the rightful owner (and also who the rightful owner is prior to cutting it loose).

My hunch is there's a pretty decent chance of making that showing. Of course the finder might also have to pay any costs associated with the vessel in the first place. For instance the ship that dragged it out into the sea. Don't really know about that part, though.
 
2014-01-23 02:13:01 PM

imfallen_angel: To The Escape Zeppelin!: Hmm. If you started with 100 rats and they had nothing to eat but each other, how long would the last rat last?

THIS.... after a couple of months, unless they were in the hundred of thousands, they can't really reproduce that fast while feeding from each other.

I'd think that unless the stores were full, they'd resort to eating anything that had any food-value/organic... at some point.. well, unless they learn to fish or have birds landing on the deck and they are fast enough to catch these birds.

Unless... there's been several salvage crew that have ventured onto that boat, never to be heard from again and those salvage ships are also adrift now.

hmmm... MOVIE! I CALL THE RIGHTS!


johnkennethmuir.files.wordpress.com
 
2014-01-23 02:37:44 PM

dittybopper: Fissile: "Her current position is unknown despite several high-level searches."

Bullshiat.  During WWII the US and British navies located, and destroyed, most Nazi U-Boats using primitive 1940s tech, but they can't manage to find an abandoned rust bucket drifting around?  They can't find this thing, because no on is really looking.

The differences are as follows:

1. The Allies used Radio Direction Finding of transmitted radio signals from the U-boats.  The rats are likely not transmitting any radio signals.

2. The Allies used intelligence information derived from breaking the Enigma machine cipher used by the U-boats to predict their movements in the future.  Again, the rats aren't transmitting.

3. The Allies used radar to search for U-boats, which we could to in this case, but during WWII we knew where many of the U-boats were because of 1 and 2.

4. The Germans needed to concentrate against convoys in order to be effective.  So the Allies put most of their antisubmarine assets (like destroyers and corvettes) in those convoys to directly battle the U-boats where they needed to mass in order to be effective.

A ship that is the same temperature as the sea isn't going to show up on infrared, and while it will show up on radar, radar has a limited range.  Even an aircraft flying at 50,000 feet can only see a ship out to a distance just a bit more than 300 miles away.  A circle with a radius of, say, 320 miles, has a coverage area of 3,158 square miles.

The Atlantic has an area of over 41 million square miles.


Having toured the Coast Guard's Fusion Center, I find these claims hard to believe. Cartels go to much more extreme lengths than simply no radio traffic to smuggle drugs. This ship doesn't blend into the water, and it sits far above the waterline. It shouldn't be much of a trick for satellite imaging to detect something that large.
 
2014-01-23 02:57:20 PM

Uchiha_Cycliste: Someone help me out here. I have recollections of a story or movie where the bad guy is telling the good guy that he taught rats on an island to eat each other to keep the rats under control and I haven't the faintest idea what it was? Vague memories of Bond though if that helps.


Hello James, welcome. Do you like the island?
 
2014-01-23 03:01:18 PM

stewbert: dittybopper: Fissile: "Her current position is unknown despite several high-level searches."

Bullshiat.  During WWII the US and British navies located, and destroyed, most Nazi U-Boats using primitive 1940s tech, but they can't manage to find an abandoned rust bucket drifting around?  They can't find this thing, because no on is really looking.

The differences are as follows:

1. The Allies used Radio Direction Finding of transmitted radio signals from the U-boats.  The rats are likely not transmitting any radio signals.

2. The Allies used intelligence information derived from breaking the Enigma machine cipher used by the U-boats to predict their movements in the future.  Again, the rats aren't transmitting.

3. The Allies used radar to search for U-boats, which we could to in this case, but during WWII we knew where many of the U-boats were because of 1 and 2.

4. The Germans needed to concentrate against convoys in order to be effective.  So the Allies put most of their antisubmarine assets (like destroyers and corvettes) in those convoys to directly battle the U-boats where they needed to mass in order to be effective.

A ship that is the same temperature as the sea isn't going to show up on infrared, and while it will show up on radar, radar has a limited range.  Even an aircraft flying at 50,000 feet can only see a ship out to a distance just a bit more than 300 miles away.  A circle with a radius of, say, 320 miles, has a coverage area of 3,158 square miles.

The Atlantic has an area of over 41 million square miles.

Having toured the Coast Guard's Fusion Center, I find these claims hard to believe. Cartels go to much more extreme lengths than simply no radio traffic to smuggle drugs. This ship doesn't blend into the water, and it sits far above the waterline. It shouldn't be much of a trick for satellite imaging to detect something that large.


The satellites only patrol the relatively narrow routes that the diesel-electric cocaine submarines use though
 
2014-01-23 03:17:00 PM

stewbert: Having toured the Coast Guard's Fusion Center, I find these claims hard to believe. Cartels go to much more extreme lengths than simply no radio traffic to smuggle drugs. This ship doesn't blend into the water, and it sits far above the waterline. It shouldn't be much of a trick for satellite imaging to detect something that large.


Actually, someone would have to look at the images, and that's a *LOT* of images.

Again, you're trying to find something that is a veritable *SPECK* on an ocean much larger than the area that the Coast Guard keeps track of.  Plus, there are vessels that size on the ocean, so just a quick search isn't necessarily going to find it.  You'd have to catalog every single vessel that approximate size over the entire North Atlantic, and then do a comparison at a later date to see which ones have moved significantly.

Plus, something else to consider:  On satellite images. a moving ship will show a wake, which is much larger and more visible than the ship itself:

www.nrcan.gc.ca

The types of satellites that have a resolution capable of actually imaging this ship closely enough to distinguish it as a non-moving ship have a very narrow field of view, and thus they only see a small "strip" of the ocean during a pass.

It's kind of like if you look at the night sky with a telescope, you will be able to see more detail than  you can with the naked eye, but it will be of a much smaller "chunk" of the night sky than your eyes can see.  The more you increase the magnification, the smaller the field of view.

This is why the Soviets used to use nuclear powered radar ocean surveillance satellites to find the US Navy, because visual satellites are just the wrong tool for the job.

Except that the Soviets were generally looking for things like carrier battle groups, easy to distinguish as a group of blips in a ring around a larger blip.
 
2014-01-23 03:30:31 PM

puckrock2000: Uchiha_Cycliste: Someone help me out here. I have recollections of a story or movie where the bad guy is telling the good guy that he taught rats on an island to eat each other to keep the rats under control and I haven't the faintest idea what it was? Vague memories of Bond though if that helps.

Hello James, welcome. Do you like the island?


thanks, that was bugging the hell out of me.
 
2014-01-23 04:03:51 PM

dittybopper: stewbert: Having toured the Coast Guard's Fusion Center, I find these claims hard to believe. Cartels go to much more extreme lengths than simply no radio traffic to smuggle drugs. This ship doesn't blend into the water, and it sits far above the waterline. It shouldn't be much of a trick for satellite imaging to detect something that large.

Actually, someone would have to look at the images, and that's a *LOT* of images.

Again, you're trying to find something that is a veritable *SPECK* on an ocean much larger than the area that the Coast Guard keeps track of.  Plus, there are vessels that size on the ocean, so just a quick search isn't necessarily going to find it.  You'd have to catalog every single vessel that approximate size over the entire North Atlantic, and then do a comparison at a later date to see which ones have moved significantly.

Plus, something else to consider:  On satellite images. a moving ship will show a wake, which is much larger and more visible than the ship itself:

[www.nrcan.gc.ca image 421x412]

The types of satellites that have a resolution capable of actually imaging this ship closely enough to distinguish it as a non-moving ship have a very narrow field of view, and thus they only see a small "strip" of the ocean during a pass.

It's kind of like if you look at the night sky with a telescope, you will be able to see more detail than  you can with the naked eye, but it will be of a much smaller "chunk" of the night sky than your eyes can see.  The more you increase the magnification, the smaller the field of view.

This is why the Soviets used to use nuclear powered radar ocean surveillance satellites to find the US Navy, because visual satellites are just the wrong tool for the job.

Except that the Soviets were generally looking for things like carrier battle groups, easy to distinguish as a group of blips in a ring around a larger blip.


I just figured that they'd use their Palantir to "look" at all the pictures. I know the tech isn't good at faces, but I figured it is good enough to find an object.
 
2014-01-23 04:20:02 PM
Oh FFS just scramble the RAF to bomb the shiat out of it - would be a good training mission.
 
2014-01-23 04:30:26 PM
Cannibal rats. So they eat other rats. What's the problem?
 
2014-01-23 04:31:28 PM

ukexpat: Oh FFS just scramble the RAF to bomb the shiat out of it - would be a good training mission.


Bombing an adrift cruise ship would be good training for your air force? I hope nobody with an outboard engine ever tries to invade you guys.
 
2014-01-23 04:49:33 PM
Actually, a drifting ship would not leave much wake if any.


It might leave a bit of a slick (not oil, but less disturbed water) on its lee side, however. Don't know if that can be easily seen.

/sailor
//has observed my boat adrift.
 
2014-01-23 05:26:10 PM

real_headhoncho: imfallen_angel: To The Escape Zeppelin!: Hmm. If you started with 100 rats and they had nothing to eat but each other, how long would the last rat last?

THIS.... after a couple of months, unless they were in the hundred of thousands, they can't really reproduce that fast while feeding from each other.

I'd think that unless the stores were full, they'd resort to eating anything that had any food-value/organic... at some point.. well, unless they learn to fish or have birds landing on the deck and they are fast enough to catch these birds.

Unless... there's been several salvage crew that have ventured onto that boat, never to be heard from again and those salvage ships are also adrift now.

hmmm... MOVIE! I CALL THE RIGHTS!

[johnkennethmuir.files.wordpress.com image 850x593]


That thing is, quite literally, my only memory of having watched Space 1999. Everything else I know about it is only what I can read about online (or watch anew).
 
2014-01-23 05:39:40 PM

ArcadianRefugee: That thing is, quite literally, my only memory of having watched Space 1999. Everything else I know about it is only what I can read about online (or watch anew).


Yeah... a space monster that grabs one of your crewmates, eats them, then spits out the remains in front of you before grabbing someone else sort of sticks in your memory.

/cheezy effects now, but scared the shiat out of me when I was a kid.
 
2014-01-23 05:54:07 PM
Welcome. Do you like the island?

eddieraysmoviereviews.files.wordpress.com
 
2014-01-23 07:11:05 PM

dittybopper: stewbert: Having toured the Coast Guard's Fusion Center, I find these claims hard to believe. Cartels go to much more extreme lengths than simply no radio traffic to smuggle drugs. This ship doesn't blend into the water, and it sits far above the waterline. It shouldn't be much of a trick for satellite imaging to detect something that large.

Actually, someone would have to look at the images, and that's a *LOT* of images.

Again, you're trying to find something that is a veritable *SPECK* on an ocean much larger than the area that the Coast Guard keeps track of.  Plus, there are vessels that size on the ocean, so just a quick search isn't necessarily going to find it.  You'd have to catalog every single vessel that approximate size over the entire North Atlantic, and then do a comparison at a later date to see which ones have moved significantly.

Plus, something else to consider:  On satellite images. a moving ship will show a wake, which is much larger and more visible than the ship itself:

[www.nrcan.gc.ca image 421x412]

The types of satellites that have a resolution capable of actually imaging this ship closely enough to distinguish it as a non-moving ship have a very narrow field of view, and thus they only see a small "strip" of the ocean during a pass.

It's kind of like if you look at the night sky with a telescope, you will be able to see more detail than  you can with the naked eye, but it will be of a much smaller "chunk" of the night sky than your eyes can see.  The more you increase the magnification, the smaller the field of view.

This is why the Soviets used to use nuclear powered radar ocean surveillance satellites to find the US Navy, because visual satellites are just the wrong tool for the job.

Except that the Soviets were generally looking for things like carrier battle groups, easy to distinguish as a group of blips in a ring around a larger blip.


I think you only get a wake if you're under power - or at least moving at a different speed or direction than the surface waters.
 
2014-01-23 07:44:24 PM

dionysusaur: dittybopper: stewbert: Having toured the Coast Guard's Fusion Center, I find these claims hard to believe. Cartels go to much more extreme lengths than simply no radio traffic to smuggle drugs. This ship doesn't blend into the water, and it sits far above the waterline. It shouldn't be much of a trick for satellite imaging to detect something that large.

Actually, someone would have to look at the images, and that's a *LOT* of images.

Again, you're trying to find something that is a veritable *SPECK* on an ocean much larger than the area that the Coast Guard keeps track of.  Plus, there are vessels that size on the ocean, so just a quick search isn't necessarily going to find it.  You'd have to catalog every single vessel that approximate size over the entire North Atlantic, and then do a comparison at a later date to see which ones have moved significantly.

Plus, something else to consider:  On satellite images. a moving ship will show a wake, which is much larger and more visible than the ship itself:

[www.nrcan.gc.ca image 421x412]

The types of satellites that have a resolution capable of actually imaging this ship closely enough to distinguish it as a non-moving ship have a very narrow field of view, and thus they only see a small "strip" of the ocean during a pass.

It's kind of like if you look at the night sky with a telescope, you will be able to see more detail than  you can with the naked eye, but it will be of a much smaller "chunk" of the night sky than your eyes can see.  The more you increase the magnification, the smaller the field of view.

This is why the Soviets used to use nuclear powered radar ocean surveillance satellites to find the US Navy, because visual satellites are just the wrong tool for the job.

Except that the Soviets were generally looking for things like carrier battle groups, easy to distinguish as a group of blips in a ring around a larger blip.

I think you only get a wake if you're under power - or at least moving at a diff ...


That was my point, if it wasn't really clear.
 
2014-01-24 03:09:33 AM
That can mean only one thing... ghost rats
img.fark.net
 
2014-01-24 09:54:08 AM
Hopefully the plot will be as good as in the amazing, bulldada movie Death Ship (1980).

Starring America's greatest president, George Kennedy, as well as Richard Crenna.

Part of its reviews:

"I spent about thirty minutes washing my mouth out after watching this crap...  Make sure you have lots of alcohol on hand before popping this tape in the VCR my friends."

Honest to goodness, it is now available both as a "remastered" DVD and on Blu-Ray.
 
2014-01-24 10:39:45 AM
This all happened before in Dracula.  Ghost ship full of rats crashes into Britain, and BAM!  Dracula happens.

They've already sent out their Bieber Renfield to distract us by trying to eat barflies.  That ship is probably loaded with Canadian vampires.  We'll be overrun with very polite bloofer ladies in a matter of weeks.

Canada's probably nothing but vampires at this point....They'll probably go after Pennsylvania first.  Someone call the Amish Embassy and warn them, quick!

Our only hope is the Tim Horton's in Columbus, Ohio.  We need to send in a team to spike the crullers and Tim Bits with garlic immediately.

Why is no one taking this threat seriosuly?!?
 
Displayed 24 of 74 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report