If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CBC)   Being a "scientific tree-hugger" is a thing now, because the two lofty aspirations never, ever conflict with one another   (cbc.ca) divider line 6
    More: Dumbass, trees, cultivation, integral, extinctions  
•       •       •

662 clicks; posted to Geek » on 14 Jan 2014 at 1:26 PM (49 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-01-14 01:31:06 PM  
5 votes:
Subby should probably stop reading "scientific journals" sponsored by the petroleum, lumber, etc. industries.
2014-01-14 01:57:44 PM  
2 votes:
I'm not just a tree hugger, I'm an Air Breather.
2014-01-14 03:30:56 PM  
1 votes:
Many people who claim to love the environment are not very scientific about it. Like people who hate deer hunting when they are over populated due to us killing off thier natural predators.
2014-01-14 02:38:12 PM  
1 votes:
Responsible environmentalism is practical, better for the economy, and less tied up in ideology that laizes faire capitalism.  Some environmentalists do not get this, but that has no bearing on how boneheaded "do nothing" is an approach.
2014-01-14 02:36:15 PM  
1 votes:
Well some of the principals that environmentalists espouse are not technically scientifically based.  That said, it's a pretty safe assumption that environmentalists as a whole are much more scientifically literate than non-environmentalists.
2014-01-14 01:52:38 PM  
1 votes:
Hmmm, it seems all the people I know who are in life sciences are "treehuggers". My brother, who has a degree in environmental science, and who worked for fish and wildlife in Washington, will be glad to tell you all the problems the salmon are having there. And many of the other scientists I met, I came to know them at the Sierra Club.

Now, sure, my physicist roommate is a global warming denier and generally anti-environmental protection, but he isn't in life sciences. He likes lasers and technology and basically perfectly fits the profile of the geek that isn't into nature.

And I'm sure all those climate scientists are who keep finding that we're causing a dangerous warming trend are just in the pockets of the filthy rich environmental lobby, and they are burying the true results of their research which is obviously in confict with their views. Same with all the biologists, botanists, and ecologists that keep finding we're in the middle of a human-caused extinction event, and are all worried about the plants and animals - I'm sure their just faking it.
 
Displayed 6 of 6 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report