Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Gawker)   Mein Kampf is surprisingly one of the best selling books over the past year. Do you know who else liked Mein Kampf?   (gawker.com) divider line 80
    More: Obvious, Mein Kampf, Shades of Grey  
•       •       •

1570 clicks; posted to Business » on 09 Jan 2014 at 1:56 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



80 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2014-01-09 01:25:40 PM  
I took a class on Nazism in college, and as part of it we had to read pretty big chunks of Mein Kampf -- thankfully, not the whole thing.

My God, is it terrilble.  I think that even if you were a Nazi, you'd have to admit that Hitler could not write for shiat.
 
2014-01-09 01:27:07 PM  
I'm tempted to go look at the reviews on Amazon but not at work.
 
2014-01-09 01:38:34 PM  
I did Nazi that coming.
 
2014-01-09 01:40:46 PM  
Jason Vorhees?
 
2014-01-09 01:48:14 PM  
"While the academic study of Mein Kampf is certainly legitimate, the spike in ebook sales likely comes from neo-Nazis and skinheads idolizing the greatest monster in history," World Jewish Congress CEO Robert Singer told ABC News.

Why would skinheads idolising Mother Theresa buy Mein Kampf?
 
2014-01-09 02:02:46 PM  
Also popular:

i.imgur.com
 
2014-01-09 02:10:17 PM  
Actually Goebbels wrote it, Hitler dictated from his cell.

Currently reading Evans' trilogy on the 3rd Reich.  Talk about the dominoes falling the right way for the National Socialists - it's no wonder ol' Adolf thought his reign was all about destiny.   Although he and his boys did make some pretty clever political maneouvers in the late 20s/early 30s and they nailed the propaganda part.
 
2014-01-09 02:10:43 PM  
What do you expect?  Fascism is on the rise everywhere
 
2014-01-09 02:19:28 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: What do you expect?  Fascism is on the rise everywhere


www.bbc.co.uk
 
2014-01-09 02:37:57 PM  
There's a reason why I have ^ that guy farkied as "Cretin"
 
2014-01-09 02:43:40 PM  

Therion: There's a reason why I have ^ that guy farkied as "Cretin"


For being right?  Weird
 
2014-01-09 02:45:51 PM  
fc09.deviantart.net
/hot
 
2014-01-09 03:05:44 PM  
Who owns the rights to Mein Kampf? Who makes money off the sales?
 
2014-01-09 03:05:53 PM  
So when are the Rightwingers going to design the 21st century Volkswagen(affordable peoples car) and concrete their spot in history that isn't about hating all those who are different from them?


/What? No claims from the Jewish lobby on how current U.S. rightwingers books are as dangerous as the worst genocidal manics on this Earth.
//Or how Israel is the exact same as the Third Reich, that they claim to hate, as they slaughter and torture the people of Palestine.
///Yummy popcorn
 
2014-01-09 03:06:05 PM  
You mean to tell me that the guy whose paintings were so crap that an austrian art school rejected him might also be incredibly terrible when it comes to other creative endeavors, like writing!? YOU DON'T SAY!
 
2014-01-09 03:10:54 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: Therion: There's a reason why I have ^ that guy farkied as "Cretin"

For being right?  Weird


If Obama is a fascist then so was Reagan.
 
2014-01-09 03:11:34 PM  

DamnYankees: Who owns the rights to Mein Kampf? Who makes money off the sales?


The state of Bavaria.
 
2014-01-09 03:11:43 PM  
Came for the Mein Kampfy Chair, leaving satisfied.
 
2014-01-09 03:14:27 PM  
I tried to read it one time in high school for a book report.  I was being a prick and reasoned that since it was in the school library they had to accept it.  I don't think I made it halfway through.
 
2014-01-09 03:25:43 PM  
This is a gag that I always have in reserve, ready for the proper trigger.

Occasionally as I'm blabbing away some admirer will goof off and say "Gee Byron, you should write your own book."

I strike a statuesque "looking toward destiny" pose, and reply solemnly "I have".

<beat>

"It's called 'My Struggle'."

Always manage to earn at least one guffaw. Sometimes a couple of chuckles.
 
2014-01-09 03:29:16 PM  
 
2014-01-09 03:40:57 PM  

ArcadianRefugee: Also popular:

[i.imgur.com image 850x478]


I plotzed.
 
2014-01-09 03:45:19 PM  
On a slightly related topic, I read Marx's Communist Manifesto last year for the first time.

I was a bit surprised that many of the issues it addressed are still relevant today.  Unskilled labor earning nearly nothing, with skilled labor being rendered unskilled due to mechanization and automation,   Company (corporate) owners earning exorbitant amounts on the backs of the workers.

And that argument about Marx wanting abolition of private property ownership?  The definition of private property has changed.  He wasn't talking about your house, he was talking about corporate ownership of businesses.  He said that the government, and therefore the citizens, should own the businesses and all benefit from its profits.
 
2014-01-09 03:53:25 PM  
A mentally disturbed mass murderer and his cohort of brown shirt f*ck buddies?

How can anyone read that garbage of delusional rants? It's like reading through the manifesto by the unibomber and somehow thinking "hey, this makes sense".
 
2014-01-09 03:54:06 PM  
I'll save you all time. Here's the key passage:

"All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."
 
2014-01-09 03:54:50 PM  

sheep snorter: So when are the Rightwingers going to design the 21st century Volkswagen(affordable peoples car) and concrete their spot in history that isn't about hating all those who are different from them?


/What? No claims from the Jewish lobby on how current U.S. rightwingers books are as dangerous as the worst genocidal manics on this Earth.
//Or how Israel is the exact same as the Third Reich, that they claim to hate, as they slaughter and torture the people of Palestine.
///Yummy popcorn


encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com

Lame dude. Really, really lame.
 
2014-01-09 03:57:49 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: Therion: There's a reason why I have ^ that guy farkied as "Cretin"

For being right?  Weird


so obama's a fascist this week? i thought he was a socialist.
 
2014-01-09 04:00:34 PM  
I tried reading it once out of sheer curiousity - I've seen 2nd graders produce better quality stuff.

/Maybe it's better in the original German
 
2014-01-09 04:06:33 PM  
i.imgur.com
 
2014-01-09 04:07:08 PM  
i2.cdn.turner.com

Is it really that surprising subby? I bet The Turner Diaries was also pretty popular.
 
2014-01-09 04:09:49 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: Therion: There's a reason why I have ^ that guy farkied as "Cretin"

For being right?  Weird


assets0.ordienetworks.com
 
2014-01-09 04:12:37 PM  

Earguy: On a slightly related topic, I read Marx's Communist Manifesto last year for the first time.

I was a bit surprised that many of the issues it addressed are still relevant today.  Unskilled labor earning nearly nothing, with skilled labor being rendered unskilled due to mechanization and automation,   Company (corporate) owners earning exorbitant amounts on the backs of the workers.

And that argument about Marx wanting abolition of private property ownership?  The definition of private property has changed.  He wasn't talking about your house, he was talking about corporate ownership of businesses.  He said that the government, and therefore the citizens, should own the businesses and all benefit from its profits.


While I agree in theory the problem is that the past century has proved that the State is no better at distributing wealth than a capitalist system and is significantly worse at producing it. The other problem is that even in a democratic system the State and the People are two separate entities with different goals. A much more workable and reasonable scenario is to have ownership of a company held directly by the employees of that company. That way they still have a vested interest in its success, they control the means of production, and you don't undermine the efficiency of the capitalist system. There are several large very successful companies in the US based on that idea.
 
2014-01-09 04:24:09 PM  
I have no conceptual idea about what fascism really is, but Obummer is totally creating a fascist state.

(You do know that would make the Repub socialists then, right?)
 
2014-01-09 04:25:52 PM  

Earguy: And that argument about Marx wanting abolition of private property ownership?  The definition of private property has changed.  He wasn't talking about your house, he was talking about corporate ownership of businesses.  He said that the government, and therefore the citizens, should own the businesses and all benefit from its profits.


The problem then is you transfer control from one oligarchy to another.  One that doesn't have any real restraints on its power.

Say a corporation steps way out of line.  Happens all the time.  Workers can go on strike, and in extreme cases, government can (though doesn't always) step in.  People can sue the corporations, and they can (though not invariably) win painful awards that make corporations change their behavior.

Government, though, has more power than any corporation could ever hope to attain.  And if it wants, it can make things like worker strikes illegal, and it can outlaw lawsuits against itself.

So concentrating both political *AND* economic power solely in the hands of the government is a real recipe for disaster, whether or not your allowed to own, say, a house and personal effects.

I'm not saying that the separation of the two is a perfect system:  It's not.  But it's less dangerous than concentrating all that power into one entity.

Now, you'll argue that "The people can change the government through their votes!",  And that's true.  Until your job at the factory depends on you voting for the right people.  Because the government is also your employer.

Just imagine your worst nightmare of a President/Congress having complete control over all manufacturing, including the manufacturing of voting machines...
 
2014-01-09 04:27:41 PM  
i.imgur.com
 
2014-01-09 04:28:14 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: Therion: There's a reason why I have ^ that guy farkied as "Cretin"

For being right?  Weird


Oh, so he's a fascist today.  When is the next scheduled switch-over to labeling him a commie socialist going to be?  It's helpful to know these things.

img.fark.net
 
2014-01-09 04:31:09 PM  
If you enjoyed reading the Communist Manifesto, I would suggest you read The State and Revolution by Lenin.  I think it would help a lot of you better understand what a worker's state is and how it functions.
 
2014-01-09 04:35:04 PM  

MadCat221: Smeggy Smurf: Therion: There's a reason why I have ^ that guy farkied as "Cretin"

For being right?  Weird

Oh, so he's a fascist today.  When is the next scheduled switch-over to labeling him a commie socialist going to be?  It's helpful to know these things.

[img.fark.net image 500x840]


You mean like how Reagan was simultaneously a doddering old fool, and an evil mastermind?

snltranscripts.jt.org/86/86fmasterbrain.phtml
 
2014-01-09 04:50:25 PM  

ArkPanda: I tried to read it one time in high school for a book report.  I was being a prick and reasoned that since it was in the school library they had to accept it.  I don't think I made it halfway through.


That sounds like when I had to do my Senior Paper on a "famous person". I chose Charles Manson, you could smell the gears grinding in my teacher's head, but she reasoned it out correctly that Manson was "famous", so I was complying. I must have written a good paper, I turned it in a week late, handwritten, and about a page short and still got a B+.
 
2014-01-09 05:00:39 PM  
You're trying to trick me into calling out Farkers in this thread, aren't you, submitter? Nice try.
 
2014-01-09 05:02:18 PM  

jake_lex: I took a class on Nazism in college, and as part of it we had to read pretty big chunks of Mein Kampf -- thankfully, not the whole thing.

My God, is it terrilble.  I think that even if you were a Nazi, you'd have to admit that Hitler could not write for shiat.


Just curious, did you read it in German or English? Because it could of just been a shiatty translation.
 
2014-01-09 05:02:29 PM  

jake_lex: I took a class on Nazism in college, and as part of it we had to read pretty big chunks of Mein Kampf -- thankfully, not the whole thing.

My God, is it terrilble.  I think that even if you were a Nazi, you'd have to admit that Hitler could not write for shiat.


it is totally rambling nonsense. i tried to read it when i was in grade 8. even then i could tell it was silly.
 
2014-01-09 05:03:14 PM  

Marshmallow Jones: Actually Goebbels wrote it, Hitler dictated from his cell.

Currently reading Evans' trilogy on the 3rd Reich.  Talk about the dominoes falling the right way for the National Socialists - it's no wonder ol' Adolf thought his reign was all about destiny.   Although he and his boys did make some pretty clever political maneouvers in the late 20s/early 30s and they nailed the propaganda part.


i think you mean Hess
 
2014-01-09 05:32:42 PM  

Therion: There's a reason why I have ^ that guy farkied as "Cretin"


+1
 
2014-01-09 05:52:35 PM  
images1.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2014-01-09 05:55:32 PM  

tjsands1118: jake_lex: I took a class on Nazism in college, and as part of it we had to read pretty big chunks of Mein Kampf -- thankfully, not the whole thing.

My God, is it terrilble.  I think that even if you were a Nazi, you'd have to admit that Hitler could not write for shiat.

Just curious, did you read it in German or English? Because it could of just been a shiatty translation.


My copy is a first (or so) edition in German with the old orthography.
/Was a gift, didn't buy it. Don't know why it was given to me, besides my being a German major.
//Not a NAZI.
 
2014-01-09 06:16:23 PM  

vharshyde: You mean to tell me that the guy whose paintings were so crap that an austrian art school rejected him might also be incredibly terrible when it comes to other creative endeavors, like writing!? YOU DON'T SAY!


I thought he invented the curveball?
 
2014-01-09 06:40:53 PM  
 
2014-01-09 06:53:24 PM  

To The Escape Zeppelin!: Earguy: On a slightly related topic, I read Marx's Communist Manifesto last year for the first time.

I was a bit surprised that many of the issues it addressed are still relevant today.  Unskilled labor earning nearly nothing, with skilled labor being rendered unskilled due to mechanization and automation,   Company (corporate) owners earning exorbitant amounts on the backs of the workers.

And that argument about Marx wanting abolition of private property ownership?  The definition of private property has changed.  He wasn't talking about your house, he was talking about corporate ownership of businesses.  He said that the government, and therefore the citizens, should own the businesses and all benefit from its profits.

While I agree in theory the problem is that the past century has proved that the State is no better at distributing wealth than a capitalist system and is significantly worse at producing it. The other problem is that even in a democratic system the State and the People are two separate entities with different goals. A much more workable and reasonable scenario is to have ownership of a company held directly by the employees of that company. That way they still have a vested interest in its success, they control the means of production, and you don't undermine the efficiency of the capitalist system. There are several large very successful companies in the US based on that idea.


Employee owned businesses aren't impossible in the capitalist system, it just turns out they aren't very good compared to investor owned corporations.  Google Lusty Lady San Francisco and you'll see that the employees had great setups but it was a lousy environment for the customers. UAW and the big three were doing something similar.  The UAW pensions and alot of the employees were heavily invested in the companies when they went bankrupt.  Turns out that union negotiators have an incentive to maximize the next contract and screw the long term consequences, otherwise the pensions wouldn't have been allowed to get so bad and the work rules would have been adjusted.  The other problem is that your assuming the workforce is immobile.  A mobile workforce has every bit as much incentive to profiteer today and move on as an 80's hedge fund manager.

In a lot of ways town/county governments are like employee owned businesses too.  The employees vote and donate heavily to whomever is going to give them the best labor contract and the AFSCME is huge in local elections.  Well that hasn't worked out so well as you can see in the wave of municipal bankruptcies going on.

Once something scales beyond a local family owned bakery investor owners tend to be the best at maximizing growth for the company and the society. Investor owned gives an incentive to succeed and provide products people want at prices they want to pay. Free markets mean that if the investor gets lazy or greedy competitors can form to topple them.  In this it's a self regulating system to clean out the scrub brush of the economy.
 
2014-01-09 07:04:13 PM  
Article Headline: Mein Kampf Is One of the Bestselling Political Books of the Year

Bestselling Political Books =/= Bestselling Books
 
2014-01-09 07:14:30 PM  
Never before has a piece of butthurt caused so much damage.
 
2014-01-09 07:27:16 PM  
cdn.ebaumsworld.com
 
2014-01-09 07:29:26 PM  

BMFPitt: Never before has a piece of butthurt caused so much damage.


The Maleus Maleficarum would like a word.
 
2014-01-09 07:38:17 PM  
So it is embarrassing for people to pick up a book written by Hitler, but it's fine for the walls of 50 Shades of Grey that you could find at the airport not too long ago?
 
2014-01-09 07:46:10 PM  
He could barely finish a thought.  Trying to read that with any flow is impossible and cannot be good for a normal human brain.

Let's see what I just wrote if Mr. Hitler had wrote it, class:

"The man stands fast but wears upon the precipice of expression heretofore unexpressed. For undertaking this visceral inflow of symbology renders NOT goodness unto reason."

A WHOLE BOOK WRITTEN LIKE THAT.
 
2014-01-09 07:50:23 PM  

FarkedOver: If you enjoyed reading the Communist Manifesto, I would suggest you read The State and Revolution by Lenin.  I think it would help a lot of you better understand what a worker's state is and how it functions.


Both Nazism and Communism have been attempted in full scale experiments.  Both failed horrifically.
 
2014-01-09 08:31:59 PM  

AngryDragon: FarkedOver: If you enjoyed reading the Communist Manifesto, I would suggest you read The State and Revolution by Lenin.  I think it would help a lot of you better understand what a worker's state is and how it functions.

Both Nazism and Communism have been attempted in full scale experiments.  Both failed horrifically.


'Nazism' is referring to a political party, which is a touch different from Communism. Not to make any statement in defense or against either, but what you said basically didn't make sense.
 
2014-01-09 08:53:33 PM  
I just went for some reason to check out the reviews as someone said they were gonna do upthread. I searched for the book title figuring that would be the easiest way to get there.


first, over on stormfront they appear to have the whole thing online (I never knew that hellholeexisted and now I wish I never did)

Second, they made it into a movie in 2009. It is listed on IMDB as a biography....and a comedy.
 
2014-01-09 08:54:31 PM  
And yet Hitlerthink survives to this day. Before Mein Kampf there was no question that Judaism is a religion. Mein Kampf argues that it is a race to justify extermination, and people are addled to this day. Also Hitler from the start blames the liberal media proactively from the start for any lack of acceptance that Mein Kampf might receive.
 
2014-01-09 08:54:46 PM  
Communism and fascism have both been tried by nations that wanted them to work. Both killed millions of their own people in the process. Communism has to win tops for f'd up though since the guys trying that bumped Hitler down to third greatest killer of the century. What's great is that we managed to water them both down into socialism and crony capitalism so we get a slow boil until we can try them again.
 
2014-01-09 09:13:16 PM  

Kevin72: And yet Hitlerthink survives to this day. Before Mein Kampf there was no question that Judaism is a religion. Mein Kampf argues that it is a race to justify extermination, and people are addled to this day.


Actually, that point of view has existed for much longer than Hitler. It was quite popular during the Spanish Inquisition.
/Logical fallacy in Christianity. The Jews killed Jesus. Who was a Jew. Who God dictated should die. Without which death, all humans would not be saved.
//Nobody expects ...
 
2014-01-09 09:27:26 PM  
History's greatest door-stop.

rationalwiki.org

Apparently it wasn't just a problem with translation either, since many in Hitlers own circle (including Speer) admitted to only "skimming" it.
 
2014-01-09 09:33:41 PM  
i know who else submitted this with a better headline. that's for bloody sure.
 
2014-01-09 09:43:48 PM  
Mein Kampf is surprisingly one of the best selling books over the past year. Do you know who else liked Mein Kampf?


Mein Kampfire Girls?
 
2014-01-09 10:52:00 PM  

Smeggy Smurf: What do you expect?  Fascism is on the rise everywhere


It is a liberal ideology. Amirite?!?
 
2014-01-09 11:36:01 PM  

Earguy: On a slightly related topic, I read Marx's Communist Manifesto last year for the first time.

I was a bit surprised that many of the issues it addressed are still relevant today.  Unskilled labor earning nearly nothing, with skilled labor being rendered unskilled due to mechanization and automation,   Company (corporate) owners earning exorbitant amounts on the backs of the workers.

And that argument about Marx wanting abolition of private property ownership?  The definition of private property has changed.  He wasn't talking about your house, he was talking about corporate ownership of businesses.  He said that the government, and therefore the citizens, should own the businesses and all benefit from its profits.


I have to say, the Communist Manifesto is brilliant, even thrilling.  And Marx could actually write.  "All that is solid melts into air," sounds like it should be Shakespeare.
 
2014-01-10 12:41:32 AM  

Moopy Mac: Smeggy Smurf: What do you expect?  Fascism is on the rise everywhere

It is a liberal ideology. Amirite?!?


Typically yes but any government that turns to corporatism is on the road to fascism.
 
2014-01-10 01:07:56 AM  
Sometime soon, a de facto government of "white guys who know stuff from being online a lot" is going to be tried: a lolocracy
 
2014-01-10 03:42:34 AM  

Triumph: I'll save you all time. Here's the key passage:

"All this was inspired by the principle - which is quite true in itself - that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying."


This thread isn't about George Bush and 9/11. Try to stay on topic.
 
2014-01-10 03:49:07 AM  
Anne Frank. Of course, she had to read the Braille edition.
 
2014-01-10 05:54:06 AM  
asians dig hitler
 
2014-01-10 08:17:56 AM  

Earguy: On a slightly related topic, I read Marx's Communist Manifesto last year for the first time.

I was a bit surprised that many of the issues it addressed are still relevant today.  Unskilled labor earning nearly nothing, with skilled labor being rendered unskilled due to mechanization and automation,   Company (corporate) owners earning exorbitant amounts on the backs of the workers.

And that argument about Marx wanting abolition of private property ownership?  The definition of private property has changed.  He wasn't talking about your house, he was talking about corporate ownership of businesses.  He said that the government, and therefore the citizens, should own the businesses and all benefit from its profits.


Marxism was a reaction to the industrial revolution, and Marx expected communism to flourish in industrial nations such as England. Yet it actually took hold in agrarian states like Russia and China. Discuss.
 
2014-01-10 09:35:07 AM  
Do you know who else liked Mein Kampf?

People who also bought Dreams of My Father.
 
2014-01-10 10:38:55 AM  
Part of me thinks that this is a natural outgrowth of the increasing political polarization of this day and age. All sides freely compare their opposition to the Nazis, and many of their followers honestly believe it. So, in a misguided attempt to understand "the enemy," they try and trace it back to the start.

Another part of me thinks that this is giving people too much credit.
 
2014-01-10 10:47:52 AM  
You have not experienced Mein Kampf until you have read it in the original Klingon.
 
2014-01-10 01:17:17 PM  

Snarfangel: You have not experienced Mein Kampf until you have read it in the original Klingon Romulan.


Fixed for relative continuity.
 
2014-01-10 03:43:09 PM  
The left in Europe has always had a hardon against the Jews.  "Banker" is often used to express hatred for Jews in public.
 
2014-01-10 04:25:20 PM  

To The Escape Zeppelin!: Earguy: On a slightly related topic, I read Marx's Communist Manifesto last year for the first time.

I was a bit surprised that many of the issues it addressed are still relevant today.  Unskilled labor earning nearly nothing, with skilled labor being rendered unskilled due to mechanization and automation,   Company (corporate) owners earning exorbitant amounts on the backs of the workers.

And that argument about Marx wanting abolition of private property ownership?  The definition of private property has changed.  He wasn't talking about your house, he was talking about corporate ownership of businesses.  He said that the government, and therefore the citizens, should own the businesses and all benefit from its profits.

While I agree in theory the problem is that the past century has proved that the State is no better at distributing wealth than a capitalist system and is significantly worse at producing it. The other problem is that even in a democratic system the State and the People are two separate entities with different goals. A much more workable and reasonable scenario is to have ownership of a company held directly by the employees of that company. That way they still have a vested interest in its success, they control the means of production, and you don't undermine the efficiency of the capitalist system. There are several large very successful companies in the US based on that idea.



What I reflect on sometimes is the fact that the two models that all economic systems in the world are based on were conceived in the 1800s, when the population was vastly lower and our society completely different. Why, by this point, has no new model come forward? Is there someone working on this or are we just going to continue to use these outdated and no longer useful economic systems?

//wish I could think of something better but I am no economist.
//I know nothing will be perfect but there has got to be room for improvement
 
2014-01-10 05:43:29 PM  

Nemo's Brother: The left in Europe has always had a hardon against the Jews.  "Banker" is often used to express hatred for Jews in public.


Really?  Because in the US, "Banker" means "Banker".  The guys who wrecked the economy without regard to religious or genetic concerns.
 
2014-01-10 08:21:51 PM  

jake_lex: I took a class on Nazism in college, and as part of it we had to read pretty big chunks of Mein Kampf -- thankfully, not the whole thing.

My God, is it terrilble.  I think that even if you were a Nazi, you'd have to admit that Hitler could not write for shiat.


My high school had it and I borrowed it. Yeah it sucked.
 
Displayed 80 of 80 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report