If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Bozeman Daily Chronicle)   Movement afoot to convene "common law grand juries" made up of citizens with little or no basis in law or competent governance. What could possibly go right?   (bozemandailychronicle.com) divider line 9
    More: Stupid, grand jury, common law grand juries, cost basis, establishments, lynch mobs  
•       •       •

4076 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Jan 2014 at 1:32 PM (49 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2014-01-09 02:30:16 PM  
1 votes:
susler:

Can it really be called a movement when there's only 1 person involved?

According to the precedent established by the "Alice's Restaurant Massacree" (Reprise Records, 1967)
It takes 3 people to be an Organization and at least 50 to be considered a movement.

/hows that for precedent
2014-01-09 01:53:29 PM  
1 votes:
Sounds like a backdoor way to prosecute teh ghey and be bothered to prosecute Sodomy laws....
2014-01-09 01:43:42 PM  
1 votes:
You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers ... these are people of the land ... the common clay of the New West....
2014-01-09 01:42:16 PM  
1 votes:

susler: Can it really be called a movement when there's only 1 person involved?


They'll think shes crazy and they won't take her.

Now if you get TWO people...
2014-01-09 01:42:08 PM  
1 votes:

susler: Bad reporting.  The first 2 paragraphs use the words citizens and groups.  But the last paragraph in the TFA included  So far, Heath said she is the only person involved in the Gallatin County effort.

Can it really be called a movement when there's only 1 person involved?


It's not a movement unless it involves a #2.
2014-01-09 01:37:05 PM  
1 votes:
"common law grand juries" made up of citizens with little or no basis in law or competent governance

Well, you'd have to get them to stop arguing in FARK threads long enough to actually do something first.
2014-01-09 01:34:57 PM  
1 votes:
I predict a bloodbath.

static.ddmcdn.com
2014-01-09 01:31:04 PM  
1 votes:
i1214.photobucket.com

What's the problem?
2014-01-09 01:24:07 PM  
1 votes:

BizarreMan: Well, the big dogs might actually face charges because the common law grand jury might not care how much influence that person has.


Face charges? Are you kidding? Common law is not an actual thing.
 
Displayed 9 of 9 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report