If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Celebslam)   2013: The Year in Wardrobe Malfunctions   (celebslam.celebuzz.com) divider line 30
    More: Cool, wardrobe malfunction, Miranda Kerr  
•       •       •

9726 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 31 Dec 2013 at 11:31 AM (29 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



30 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-12-31 11:38:13 AM
Ok, so since when has showing your ta-tas at a topless photoshoot been a wardrobe malfunction?  I would think the wardrobe malfunction would be if they were covered.
 
2013-12-31 11:41:50 AM
Meh.   Also, proves my hypothesis that if you see enough, it is no longer a 'sensation'.
 
2013-12-31 11:42:19 AM

RyansPrivates: Ok, so since when has showing your ta-tas at a topless photoshoot been a wardrobe malfunction?  I would think the wardrobe malfunction would be if they were covered.



Shhhhh......ta-tas
 
2013-12-31 11:46:25 AM

RyansPrivates: Ok, so since when has showing your ta-tas at a topless photoshoot been a wardrobe malfunction?  I would think the wardrobe malfunction would be if they were covered.


Similarly, when is shooting an upskirt picture when the woman is wearing underwear a "wardrobe malfunction".  And the zoomed-in shots were just click filler.
 
2013-12-31 11:52:48 AM
What's happening here?
 
2013-12-31 11:56:40 AM
The see through dresses are not wardrobe malfunctions. That's Professional attention whoring.
 
2013-12-31 11:57:25 AM

Big Beef Burrito: What's happening here?


This is where we realize "CelebritySlam" is edited by a 12 year old boy.

I'm not sure how crotch shots of panties and tights qualify as "malfunctions" either. I don't think we needed closeups on many of those crotch shots.
 
2013-12-31 11:58:21 AM
Is that a tampon string in Eva's photo?
 
2013-12-31 12:01:37 PM

abhorrent1: The see through dresses are not wardrobe malfunctions. That's Professional attention whoring.


Some women apparently don't know that a flash against these shear tight black dresses allows the camera to see right through. There was a fun shot of Alexandra Kerry (John Kerry's daughter) from a political event where there was little chance she was trying for this level of exposure.
 
2013-12-31 12:06:56 PM
The book.  It is marked.
 
2013-12-31 12:10:19 PM

DSF6969: The book.  It is marked.


Whay would you do that?
 
2013-12-31 12:11:19 PM
24.media.tumblr.com

Extremely and unnecessarily
 
2013-12-31 12:27:55 PM

Crewmannumber6: DSF6969: The book.  It is marked.

Whay would you do that?


Old habit from college.  I have a drawer full of highlighters

/I'm also at work and can't look at the ta-tas yet.
 
2013-12-31 12:31:14 PM
Uhm...it's not a wardrobe malfunction when you can see their Spanx.

They really are reaching for clicks...aren't they?
 
2013-12-31 12:36:45 PM

utsagrad123: Is that a tampon string in Eva's photo?


Funny, you noticed the string while the only thing that I noticed is that she has a fat coochie.
 
2013-12-31 12:38:15 PM
So if I stalk a woman and snap pictures up her skirt when she's exiting a car, that's HER fault because her wardrobe malfunctioned?!

Fascinating rules we have now.
 
2013-12-31 12:40:06 PM
If Miley Cyrus is wearing a clear trash bag and her tittay is showing is that really a malfunction?
 
2013-12-31 12:52:41 PM
I can't get behind calling these "malfunctions", but boobies.
 
2013-12-31 12:57:49 PM

monoski: If Miley Cyrus is wearing a clear trash bag and her tittay is showing is that really a malfunction?


Well, Miley herself might be malfunctioning.
 
2013-12-31 12:58:47 PM

monoski: If Miley Cyrus is wearing a clear trash bag and her tittay is showing is that really a malfunction?


No this was planned this way.  When the photographer is Terry richardson, having her boobs accidentally covered would have been the malfunction.
 
2013-12-31 01:14:36 PM

ZeroCorpse: So if I stalk a woman and snap pictures up her skirt when she's exiting a car, that's HER fault because her wardrobe malfunctioned?!

Fascinating rules we have now.


I'm flabbergasted that behaviour that will get you arrested anywhere else is considered acceptable for paparazzi.
 
2013-12-31 01:21:09 PM
25.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-12-31 01:33:45 PM
I'm not so desperate to see tits that I'll click through 18 pages to see a few blurry peeks of nipple.

I'm on the internet, for cryin' out loud.
 
2013-12-31 01:56:27 PM

monoski: abhorrent1: The see through dresses are not wardrobe malfunctions. That's Professional attention whoring.

Some women apparently don't know that a flash against these shear tight black dresses allows the camera to see right through. There was a fun shot of Alexandra Kerry (John Kerry's daughter) from a political event where there was little chance she was trying for this level of exposure.


You're right. It is fun
 
2013-12-31 02:31:27 PM
I see that the people who don't understand the effects of camera flash on sheer material have already shown up in the thread.

Also, I second the motion that paparazzi stuffing their camera in someone's crotch doesn't qualify as a "wardrobe malfunction."
 
2013-12-31 02:38:06 PM

unyon: ZeroCorpse: So if I stalk a woman and snap pictures up her skirt when she's exiting a car, that's HER fault because her wardrobe malfunctioned?!

Fascinating rules we have now.

I'm flabbergasted that behaviour that will get you arrested anywhere else is considered acceptable for paparazzi.


I've wondered this myself - I would have thought that if you were running out into the road to snap pictures of someone and were blocking traffic you would be charged for something. That, or aggressively pursuing someone in a car.
 
2013-12-31 02:41:51 PM
 
2013-12-31 03:10:49 PM
I booked a table at Mark's for....sometime later this evening
 
2013-12-31 06:13:00 PM
That Kelly Brook pic isn't a "malfunction", you can see her pantyhose instead of her snatch so her wardrobe is functioning quite normally.
 
2013-12-31 08:03:56 PM
See through shirts are not malfunctioning, they're working exactly as they should.

Also, some photographer sneaking a shot up some womans skirt is only a malfunction in the sense that the photographer is a no good perverted piece of shiat.

How is it that those pieces of shiat don't get arrested for those pics? If I wen't to a shopping mall and went around taking pics of women getting out of their cars trying to get upskirt shots, I'd be in jail.
 
Displayed 30 of 30 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report