Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(PetaPixel)   Man selling photography 'teaching' franchises found to be stealing photos. Questions arise about his crowd funding effort to replace "stolen" equipment. Bonus: Someone recognizes his face: "Wasn't he dying from cancer a few years ago?"   (petapixel.com) divider line 17
    More: Weird, media franchise  
•       •       •

8674 clicks; posted to Main » on 26 Dec 2013 at 9:34 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-12-26 10:36:57 AM  
3 votes:

TheDirtyNacho: So the internet mob has turned on people who make composites with stock images?  Get ready to march on marketing departments and ad firms...

/yes, I see he seems to have lifted some non-stock
//and calls it 'journalism'
///guilty of being a douche perhaps


It's more than that. In the captions he is claiming he actually took the pictures. Did you not see the sunrise one where he wrote "I would say the sunrise at 7:30 with the storm moving in was pretty awesome. This was actually a test shot". He has no idea what f*cking time that picture was taken because he didn't even take it. Plus it wasn't his "shot". Shot means you shot the picture. He was being deceitful and should be pummeled off the internet by the internet.
2013-12-26 12:09:39 PM  
2 votes:

steam_cannon: Using stock background images from a paid art account is the bread and butter of high school photo shoots. In the photography business there are a lot of customers that would like their likeness stuck into a nice stock photo. Most real customers don't have time or money for on location photo-shoots.


There is so much bullshiat packed into these three sentences I have no reason to read the rest of your post.
2013-12-26 11:51:36 AM  
2 votes:

steam_cannon: This all sounds like bad press paid for by a competing photography company and like nothing really wrong happened.


This sounds like an alt account for the scumbag in the link.
2013-12-26 10:59:20 AM  
2 votes:

spawn73: Anyone that feels its relevant to mention that they've "spent the day praying" or that they "love Jesus and my kid" can DIAF. No, you're not better than me because you envoke your faith in everything you say, infact you're a farking sinner.


So much this. IME, if someone says "praying" in a context other than an actual religious service, or as in sympathy for a personal loss, run.

Or, in the words of WSB: "If you're doing business with a religious son-of-a-biatch, get it in writing. His word isn't worth shiat. Not with the good lord telling him how to fark you on the deal."
2013-12-26 10:33:46 AM  
2 votes:

TheDirtyNacho: So the internet mob has turned on people who make composites with stock images?  Get ready to march on marketing departments and ad firms...

/yes, I see he seems to have lifted some non-stock
//and calls it 'journalism'
///guilty of being a douche perhaps


Reading comprehension: D-
2013-12-26 09:59:53 AM  
2 votes:
Can you loan him $10, though? He ran out of gas and his car is just around the corner. He's supposed to be at a funeral in a town 30 miles from here. His wife and infant daughter are in the car waiting for him. He lost his credit card. So, please, can you just do him a solid and lend him $10 so he can gas up and get to that funeral?
2013-12-26 09:48:09 AM  
2 votes:

offmymeds: kendelrio: These assholes are the ones who fark it up for everyone.

How so?


By getting caught using such blatant means. The scam has to be subtle. Now the marks are suspicious.
2013-12-26 02:05:53 PM  
1 votes:

IlGreven: MSFT: So... did I miss the part about him claiming to have cancer? Or was that a joke that went over my head?

In the comments on the CJ FB page, there's this (reposted in the comments at TFA):

"I have a comment/question that is totally different from ANY of the 450 comments on here....Is he still sick and dying? When I met him last April, he would tell me every week that he had various treatments for Cancer and liver dialysis --that he was in fact dying..Ii would always try to ask for upcoming information and help him with any moral support I could, but it was very difficult because he would become very defensive and dismissive if I dare asked a question. He was VERY sick every week or every other week -constantly...and then in the 9 months since I last had contact with him, I have never seen him make any mention of it....Is he still sick or was the Cancer cured?"


His story is in remission too.
2013-12-26 02:03:55 PM  
1 votes:

EdenLiesObscured: Read about this the other day. The "photographer" has incredible kahunas. He's a gutsy shyster who works really, really hard at cheating the system so he doesn't have to work sort of hard. But his mouth and blatant lying after being presented evidence are keeping him in hot water. This defamation suit is a dying grasp....


Is this the guy?

clarknikdelpowell.com

"Yeah, that's the ticket."
2013-12-26 01:16:20 PM  
1 votes:

Misconduc: FarkingReading: Can you loan him $10, though? He ran out of gas and his car is just around the corner. He's supposed to be at a funeral in a town 30 miles from here. His wife and infant daughter are in the car waiting for him. He lost his credit card. So, please, can you just do him a solid and lend him $10 so he can gas up and get to that funeral?

Jeez where I live this is all to common, the bullshiat list grows every year, here are my top 5 this year alone

1) I'm sorry to bother you, but I need to go see a doctor across town and need some change to get a taxi, could you please help me? (Fat tub in a mobility scooter who I guess doesn't know what a Bus is since Taxis don't take mobility scooters here)
2) Im out of gas (for a really obnoxious reason like your kids dying)
3) my landlord is about to evict me can you spare change so i don't get evicted? (being a landlord this is funny because it wont stop the process)
4) my kid needs some medicine at the pharmacy however I cannot afford it can you help me out?
This is my personal favorite
5) I need some gas money man, will you buy something from the back of my trunk like an Ipad or Gold chain? gimmie $50 for this rolex! Dawg its a real rolex no joke!


Once had a person approach me and a girlfriend in a restaurant when I lived in Oregon. Sob story about formula for kids, etc. She (gf) was ready to give money but I gave her a look of, "no, no. let them speak some more."

They went on to say they were from California, specifically the town I was born and raised in. I asked them about very specific and well known landmarks in the area and they stumbled. Hard. They had no clue what I was talking about.

I still laugh because I know they went on to other people using the same line but the look on their face when I let them know I was from the exact place they pulled out of their ass still makes me giggle.
2013-12-26 12:51:01 PM  
1 votes:

steam_cannon: This all sounds like bad press paid for by a competing photography company and like nothing really wrong happened. Using stock background images from a paid art account is the bread and butter of high school photo shoots. In the photography business there are a lot of customers that would like their likeness stuck into a nice stock photo. Most real customers don't have time or money for on location photo-shoots.

Quote from tumbler: "I've checked in with the original photographers and outside of the stock agencies he's not been granted permission to use the original works in this manner "

"and outside of the stock agencies he's ", so what is that supposed to mean? What that sounds like is a photographer sold his photo to a stock art company and the stock art company is reselling it to this company. This is normal. The original photographer hasn't directly granted permission for use in this manner, but normally he wouldn't do that because the original photographer sold his rights to the stock art company so the original photographer is irrelevant and the rights the stock agency holds is all that matters. What it sounds like is everyone was paid. The argument in this quote looks false and is worded trickily to get people upset. This nitpicking sounds like pedantic nonsense.

Quote from tumbler: "some images he used are NOT stock and he did NOT get rights to use the images".

This is the tumbler posters claim but, they didn't post any proof backing this up. This is an accusation and a fairly unimportant one. Even this tumbler article admits that the photography company made some efforts to secure digital rights for at least some of the photos, so this doesn't sound like the company is trying to skirt the law. At worst a mistake was made with some of the digital rights, but that's an easy mistake. And so far this tumbler article hasn't even proven any mistakes were made. So far I'm only seeing accusations and zero proof.

Quote from tumbler: "Note that most of the imag ...


Farking Master Craftsmanship
11/10

From conflating the issue of him selling "composite" images that he changed nothing on, to ignoring the his claims of the heritage of the "shots," to attacking those who attack him... I think this may well be the best bait in the water in years. Topping it off with the "accusations and zero proof" when the proof is displayed in both the article and the comments... fan-farking tastic. You sir, are the Bob Ross of trollolol, and you'v really elevated your craft to an art. Goddamn brilliant.
2013-12-26 12:25:30 PM  
1 votes:

steam_cannon: This all sounds like bad press paid for by a competing photography company and like nothing really wrong happened.


So tell me, psychopath, who do you work for?
2013-12-26 11:25:25 AM  
1 votes:

TheDirtyNacho: So the internet mob has turned on people who make composites with stock images?  Get ready to march on marketing departments and ad firms...

/yes, I see he seems to have lifted some non-stock
//and calls it 'journalism'
///guilty of being a douche perhaps


You're so hip and edgy, going against the grain.
When you think about it, Hitler wasn't as bad as people say.
2013-12-26 11:08:23 AM  
1 votes:
Read about this the other day. The "photographer" has incredible kahunas. He's a gutsy shyster who works really, really hard at cheating the system so he doesn't have to work sort of hard. But his mouth and blatant lying after being presented evidence are keeping him in hot water. This defamation suit is a dying grasp....
2013-12-26 10:25:29 AM  
1 votes:
And because I know someone will want it...

i41.tinypic.com

The original
2013-12-26 10:20:34 AM  
1 votes:
Anyone that feels its relevant to mention that they've "spent the day praying" or that they "love Jesus and my kid" can DIAF. No, you're not better than me because you envoke your faith in everything you say, infact you're a farking sinner.
2013-12-26 10:12:39 AM  
1 votes:
This guy should run for Congress, he'd fit right in!
 
Displayed 17 of 17 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report