If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(ABC Local)   You wreck your hummer breaking your girlfriend's pelvis. Do you: a) wait for emergency services, b) drive her to the hospital, or c) stuff her in a convenient attic?   (abclocal.go.com) divider line 13
    More: Dumbass, Friendswood, girlfriend, roll overs, pelvic fracture  
•       •       •

10739 clicks; posted to Main » on 29 Nov 2013 at 4:31 PM (42 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-11-29 05:28:27 PM
3 votes:
If he was truly trying to help her, why didn't he call 911?  So far, no one has suggested he call for help on one of their cell phones but it does sound like a good idea unless you have some weird idea that hiding her in an attic will somehow make the screwup go away.
2013-11-29 04:59:22 PM
3 votes:
Wow. What an asshole
2013-11-29 07:11:09 PM
2 votes:

agent00pi: I misread that as hammer, and was confused. Subby should be shot for not capitalising a noun.


Marketroids should be lined up against the wall for naming a civilian product line based on the military Humvee after a blowjob, thereby giving a bad name to blowjobs everywhere.
2013-11-29 05:38:51 PM
2 votes:

phojo1946: If he was truly trying to help her, why didn't he call 911?


FTFA : "Neighbors called police but investigators say Fitzpatrick didn't wait. "

He went knocking on doors until he found someone home.  They called 911.  Then he dumped her in a nearby attic and ran off.  I don't get it, at all, but at that point, he's due for some serious charges.

Also, there was a 20 year old driving a hummer, and a 17 year old girl in the vehicle, and neither had a cell phone?  That seems incredibly unlikely.
2013-11-30 02:29:57 AM
1 votes:

Chevello: \and if 18 is old enough to get sent to Afghanistan, it should be old enough to buy a beer.


I certainly agree on that.  If anything, I think the age should be much,much younger, with a stipulation of having someone 25 or older saying "I'm responsible for that guy".

The idea that "We'll make it illegal, and therefore nobody will do it" ignores every bit of available evidence. Pot has been illegal all my life, yet someone who has no friends, moved to a new town, has no pull or inside information, could still buy pot in an hour or less.

So kids are going to drink, and when they do, I'd rather them do it when there are adults around, instead of having to hide it from adults.

That doesn't change the fact that if you are in a car wreck that injures someone, trying to hide it and getting caught should fark your life up.  This guy at least started out trying to get help - and then changed his mind and tried to hide her in an attic.

He should have made getting her some care a major priority, and changing his mind mid-stream and putting her in an attic while he ran to hide doesn't do a thing to put me on his side.  It's not his age that's a problem.  It's not the fact (technically an assumption) that he was drinking under-age.   I think at 20 he should be legal to drink.

It's the fact that he didn't give a crap about his friend and was more concerned with running away before he got caught than her chances of living/dying.  Sticking her in an attic, telling nobody, running away, that makes him the kind of scumbag that should be locked in jail.
2013-11-29 06:48:33 PM
1 votes:
I am curious, however, as to what the possible use could be for a scaled down version of a military transport.  They're high off the ground, true.  They have very large tires that I assume run flat.  They seat four, but so does a Honda Accord.  So, essentially, they're either one big huge neon sign that says "LOOK AT MY F*CK YOU MONEY!", something misery dealers buy to hide their income - which is a bit stupid because nothing says "I sling dope" like living at your mama's house with a 70,000.00 car - or they're for people who jerk off to war movies.

Either way, it's sh*t.

I mean, I've owned a lot of cars, most of them beaters, and atm, I drive a minivan with 187,000 miles on it.  No self respecting car thief, if there is such a thing, would go near it for fear of developing post laceration tetanus.  But it also has every possible luxury except for telescoping wheel and a 10 speaker Infinity rig with 2 subs that can move air at 32 Hz fundementals.  It's the jazz for checking mixes on a consumer rig.

I've owned a lot of luxury cars.  I like leaners.  And, I hate to break it to the SUV crowd, but your driving a very cramped station wagon on a pickup truck frame. That's IT.  Fullstop.  It's not a luxury car.  It's just 6" higer off the ground than a DeVille and a lot less roomy.  So, is a Hummer an SUV?  So is it a paramilitary vehicle?  No.  Is it practical for any sort of urban or even paved rural terrains?  No. Does it sip gas?  Let's talk about gallons to the mile.  Is it roomy?  No.  Is it a bothersome crusade to enter or egress?  Quite.  So, as far as I can tell, it's option A. And I hate to piss in all the H3 crowd's petunias, but nobody gives a William nor Nilliam polly wolly doo dah about your f*ck you money.  Honest.
2013-11-29 06:00:21 PM
1 votes:
Bad things happening to anyone in a Hummvee = good times for the rest of us.

A Hummer is just a big BMW.
2013-11-29 05:47:07 PM
1 votes:
detectives found his Hummer 3 in a ditch

Point, set, match.  I've never met anybody who owned one of those who wasn't a nasty, me first prick.  I'm fine with evidence to the contrary.
2013-11-29 05:33:13 PM
1 votes:

Peter von Nostrand: We're talking about a hummer here. If I wrecked her pelvis, I'd be bragging to anyone that would listen


img842.imageshack.us
2013-11-29 05:16:02 PM
1 votes:

iheartscotch: I see, I assume you advocate a more laissez faire approach? I agree that there is some merit in such a notion; such as, a sip of wine at dinner should not be an arrest-able offense.

But, I submit to you that teenagers are idiots; as such, I feel it is perfectly equitable to limit a minor's access to booze.


Limit a minor's access to booze? It seems such an easy solution; why has nobody tried this before?
2013-11-29 05:04:46 PM
1 votes:

iheartscotch: Slaxl: iheartscotch: Suckmaster Burstingfoam: iheartscotch: I'm sure that there will be someone along to say why it's ok for teenagers to be running around with 20 year-olds. Nothing bad could possibly happen in that circumstance....

Cuz if she had been out with another drunk 17-year-old, there's no way that accident would have happened.

Maybe, 17 year olds shouldn't have access to cars OR booze? Can we do that? Is that an equitable situation?

No.

I see, I assume you advocate a more laissez faire approach? I agree that there is some merit in such a notion; such as, a sip of wine at dinner should not be an arrest-able offense.

But, I submit to you that teenagers are idiots; as such, I feel it is perfectly equitable to limit a minor's access to booze.


I agree, they're idiots, but teaching them from a young age how to drink responsibly is better than making it something cool to sneak off in the night with friends and drink as much as possible as quickly as possible because they don't know when they will next get to try it, and look cool to their friends.

They're idiots which makes them far more susceptible to attempting to be cool whilst drunk. So strip the mystique and cool factor from drinking and it won't be a problem.

Same for all drugs.
2013-11-29 04:55:27 PM
1 votes:

iheartscotch: Suckmaster Burstingfoam: iheartscotch: I'm sure that there will be someone along to say why it's ok for teenagers to be running around with 20 year-olds. Nothing bad could possibly happen in that circumstance....

Cuz if she had been out with another drunk 17-year-old, there's no way that accident would have happened.

Maybe, 17 year olds shouldn't have access to cars OR booze? Can we do that? Is that an equitable situation?


No.
2013-11-29 04:47:57 PM
1 votes:
Prediction: "Hummer" (which is not a vehicle, dammit) or no, he will soon discover how many of the guys in prison are FitzWilliams.
 
Displayed 13 of 13 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report