If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NPR)   Recount requested after SeaTac, Washington voters approve minimum wage of $15 an hour. Well, that's what happens when you get vote counters who are only paid $8.25 an hour   (npr.org) divider line 49
    More: Followup, Seatac, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, best value, Alaska Airlines  
•       •       •

3694 clicks; posted to Politics » on 28 Nov 2013 at 2:54 PM (39 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-11-28 03:49:59 PM
5 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

If there is no profit, why am I investing all my money and 80 hours of my time per week?

So I'm assuming you feel that a business owner is entitled to some return on investment if not, well then you're an uneducatable semi literate child and should hold your tongue while the adults speak.

That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then there simply won't be any profits.


1. We are talking about minimum wage, so its service jobs.

2. You can raise prices. Your competition is in the same boat and under the same pressures as you.

If your business acumen is so weak you can't pay a living wage and stay in business then maybe you should do something else and leave running a successful business to 'the adults'.
2013-11-28 03:17:49 PM
5 votes:
A low minimum wage is just another example of corporate welfare. Companies benefit from not having to pay workers a livable wage, knowing that the government will pick up the difference via social programs. Being against socialism, but also against raising the minimum wage, is like being against abortion, but not wanting people to use birth control either.
2013-11-28 09:57:51 PM
4 votes:

Unemployedingreenland: Our margins are OK (15%-20%) - not great, but so long as we have a sufficient level of revenue, I can make a decent living for me and my family.


And what about your employees?
You say happy and well compensated, but enough to call it a decent living? For them AND their families?

If you're anything like the standard business owner, you've probably got something cooked up like "Well, they're only high school and college students. They don't deserve more. I can't afford more."  I hear that kind of talk alot, and it always seems like while workers aren't owed decent wages, businesses are always owed cheap workers. I'm of the opinion that if your business doesn't provide a living for your employees, it shouldn't provide one for you either. No great loss to see a business relying solely on cheap work go under.

The flip side is such that just maybe, if the entire area/state/etc has an increased minimum wage, you'll actually be able to budge on your price points because of increased ability for consumers to spend. Someone else said it, too. All this belt-tightening has left no one below the top 10% with money left to spend, to be frivolous with, to consume, to drive the damn economy. Your price points won't budge because people won't spend more for your product. I say, especially now, that this isn't because people don't want your product/service, but that they can't justify the cost versus their cost of living.
2013-11-28 07:05:32 PM
4 votes:

Zeb Hesselgresser: "The best way to sabotage chances for upward mobility of a youngster from a single-parent household, who resides in a violent slum and has attended poor-quality schools is to make it unprofitable for any employer to hire him. The way to accomplish that is to mandate an employer to pay such a person a wage that exceeds his skill level."              - Dr. Williams


"Conservatives say if you don't give the rich more money, they will lose their incentive to invest. As for the poor, they tell us they've lost all incentive because we've given them too much money."
―  George Carlin
2013-11-28 05:21:25 PM
4 votes:
There's a chain of burger joints here in Seattle which starts their employees at $10.25/hour, which is substantially less than $15 of course (although well above the minimum wage), but they also provide 100% employer paid health insurance, child care assistance of up to $8,000/year, and college tuition assistance of up to $5,500/year. They've been in business for over 50 years, and the family that owns the company lives quite well. It is possible to treat employees like human beings and still make a reasonable profit.
2013-11-28 11:19:14 PM
3 votes:
We're told the sky will fall whenever the minimum wage goes up. Then the wage goes up. And nothing happens. And then they recycle the same lame arguments a few years later.
2013-11-28 10:57:18 PM
3 votes:

BMulligan: There's a chain of burger joints here in Seattle which starts their employees at $10.25/hour, which is substantially less than $15 of course (although well above the minimum wage), but they also provide 100% employer paid health insurance, child care assistance of up to $8,000/year, and college tuition assistance of up to $5,500/year. They've been in business for over 50 years, and the family that owns the company lives quite well. It is possible to treat employees like human beings and still make a reasonable profit.


In other words, anti-living wage people:

Eat a bag of Dicks.
2013-11-28 10:42:00 PM
3 votes:

Unemployedingreenland: Regardless of business acumen, there's simply no way to pass that additional cost on to my customers.  We have particular "sticky" price points - $19.99 (no really), and $199.99 (again, really).  No matter how we sell, bundle or package things, once the cost per person hits $20 (or the cost per party/group/event hits $200), we see a significant dropoff in sales.  In other words, people seem to be ok with spending less than $20/$200, but there's a widely-held understanding that $20+/$200+ is too much and there's a visceral aversion to spending that much or more on what we offer.

So if my labor costs increase 50%, my margins go negative unless I can somehow overcome this $20/$200 issue (and we've been doing this long enough to understand that there's no handy solution)


I hate to break it to you, but even without a minimum wage change, you'd better get that figured out, because inflation is going to peck away at your margins if you can't ever raise your prices.  Just in the past four years, all else being equal, inflation has cut your margins by 7% or so.  So if you can't get past that $20 sticking point, you probably don't have more than four more years left anyway.
2013-11-28 06:32:44 PM
3 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: But you cannot raise prices since this new wage is Sea-Tac only.  For any service or retail industry people can drive a couple of minutes and get the same product for less.


It's only for workers at the airport. I'm sure all the travelers going through Sea-Tac are going to leave the terminal, hop a cab to the Wendy's down the street, grab some food, then wait in the security line to get back to the terminal instead of just paying a buck more for their Baconator. Especially the big chunk of people traveling on business who are expensing out their meals anyway. I'm sure they are going to seek lower prices elsewhere.
2013-11-28 05:12:33 PM
3 votes:

dinch: whidbey: dinch: , but how the hell can a business like that support $15 an hour

Dairy Queen is a good example of a business where the cost of their product is well under a dollar per burger, and probably less for cases of fries, ice cream and other stuff.

They can afford a wage increase. They don't want to because they make more money without having to.

I get that, I really do. Thing is, $45 an hour plus insurance (not health, just the basic' if anybody accidentally mixes bleach and chlorine'), product, equipment, rent and then what you're losing to the kids that are being kids... I just don't see how that could be viable.


Well, you're welcome to break it down for me. And I seriously doubt that kids sneaking a burger or an ice cream cone is a major factor in business costs.

If Dairy Queen is making enough profit to stay well afloat, then they can afford a wage increase.

And it's been pointed out here, if you can't put that cost into your business plan, it's stupid to blame a wage increase on your inability to succeed in the market. And I know that's going to piss some armchair economists here off. Good.
2013-11-28 05:02:26 PM
3 votes:

dinch: , but how the hell can a business like that support $15 an hour


Dairy Queen is a good example of a business where the cost of their product is well under a dollar per burger, and probably less for cases of fries, ice cream and other stuff.

They can afford a wage increase. They don't want to because they make more money without having to.
2013-11-28 03:32:44 PM
3 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

If there is no profit, why am I investing all my money and 80 hours of my time per week?

So I'm assuming you feel that a business owner is entitled to some return on investment if not, well then you're an uneducatable semi literate child and should hold your tongue while the adults speak.

That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then there simply won't be any profits.


Think of all the new people with higher wages who can suddenly afford your product/ service.
2013-11-29 01:22:26 PM
2 votes:

Carousel Beast: I bet you don' say the same thing about a government.


Governments aren't businesses. A business is trying to provide a product or a service to a target market for profit. Governments provide services equally to all people everywhere for public health and well-being.

When you run a government like a business, it is called Fascism.
2013-11-29 11:56:55 AM
2 votes:

Carousel Beast: rustypouch: Prophet of Loss: Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

If there is no profit, why am I investing all my money and 80 hours of my time per week?

So I'm assuming you feel that a business owner is entitled to some return on investment if not, well then you're an uneducatable semi literate child and should hold your tongue while the adults speak.

That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then there simply won't be any profits.

1. We are talking about minimum wage, so its service jobs.

2. You can raise prices. Your competition is in the same boat and under the same pressures as you.

If your business acumen is so weak you can't pay a living wage and stay in business then maybe you should do something else and leave running a successful business to 'the adults'.

Yep.

If a business can't cover its cost, the model isn't viable.

I bet you don' say the same thing about a government.


Can we stop comparing the government to businesses?

Governments are inherently different from businesses and have explicitly different goals.
2013-11-29 03:38:19 AM
2 votes:

Klom Dark: Well, consider yourself lucky... I own a business that has no labor costs but my own time (Which I do not charge the company for...), have put thousands of hours into it for two years. Have spent time to list over 40,000 items (Collectable Sports Cards). It's free for anyone to list their items for absolutely free and in order to get people to just use the site not even currently charging ANYTHING to ANYONE, and still haven't made a damn sale. A miserable failure of a business that I do out of the goodness of my heart and also to fine-tune my skills as a developer/consultant.

TonsOfCards.com, check it out, nobody else does...


I did, and it's not very good. It looks like a lot of web sites do when their developer does all the work on one particular computer with a particular monitor in a particular lighting that makes him or her feel a particular way. I suggest you back up your site in its entirety, and then completely remove the CSS formatting to return to a totally neutral look and see what you still have. Some things I noticed that are uncomfortable to use: adding to your shopping cart should immediately put a price on the cart icon; drilling down into (for example) Basketball > 1990 > Fleer > Base Set is not how people want to browse; floating controls to the right are annoying especially since your site seems to demand a particular width; and although your popup caption effect is kind of fun, the text often appears offscreen or outside the background that makes it readable.  I'm sure your programming skills are up to par, so find a way to show them off.
2013-11-28 09:58:27 PM
2 votes:

Bllasae: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

You mean when half the workforce gets laid off because they're only going to pay the same wages for half the company? Yeah.


What's a layoff? Never heard of them. They must not have ever happened in the past.

/If your business requires slaves to succeed, your business can fail.
2013-11-28 08:55:03 PM
2 votes:

Unemployedingreenland: Simply put, we are a business that cannot survive a large spike in the minimum wage.  We're not curing cancer, so the world won't suffer greatly if we shut our doors, but 35+ happy and reasonably well compensated employees will be out of work, my landlord will suffer from the loss of a long-standing tenant, my vendors will not have my business, and my personal spending will decline significantly.


...I would venture to say that this "problem" is irrelevant.  If we continue the tack we're on, there will be more than 35 employees that are either not "happy and reasonably well compensated" or "out of work" due to existing laws. Many landlords already suffer from not having any tenants to meet their rent demands (and, like you, can't change their rents without eating a loss). Many vendors are being cut out of business' books to save money already.  And personal spending has been declining significantly among the bottom half of the economy because no one there has any money.

This solution is like trying to get a painful splinter out of a child's foot.  Yes, it will hurt a lot in the short-term, but doing it now is a lot better than letting that wound fester.
2013-11-28 08:51:41 PM
2 votes:
But won't increasing the minimum wage mean that workers have more expendable income to spend at all those businesses that are against increasing the minimum wage?  Why do those businesses want their customers to stay poor?
2013-11-28 08:11:15 PM
2 votes:

SCUBA_Archer: overpay for labor.


Do tell...
d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net
2013-11-28 08:02:51 PM
2 votes:
I have a small business and employ about 35 part timers - all college and high school students.  We pay about 15% above minimum wage because I don't want to compete with McD's for my labor pool.  We have no direct competition in the area (we are a particular kind of family amusement business), but there is plenty of indirect competition - everything from other venue based entertainment options - bowling, movies, etc. - to gaming systems, Netflix, etc, to just hanging out at someone's house.  Labor is my single largest expense, and eats approx 35% of revenue.  We are also significantly more labor intensive than my indirect competitors.  Our margins are OK (15%-20%) - not great, but so long as we have a sufficient level of revenue, I can make a decent living for me and my family.

In my state, there is talk of raising the minimum wage to about $13/hr, which would increase my labor costs 50%+.  Regardless of business acumen, there's simply no way to pass that additional cost on to my customers.  We have particular "sticky" price points - $19.99 (no really), and $199.99 (again, really).  No matter how we sell, bundle or package things, once the cost per person hits $20 (or the cost per party/group/event hits $200), we see a significant dropoff in sales.  In other words, people seem to be ok with spending less than $20/$200, but there's a widely-held understanding that $20+/$200+ is too much and there's a visceral aversion to spending that much or more on what we offer.

So if my labor costs increase 50%, my margins go negative unless I can somehow overcome this $20/$200 issue (and we've been doing this long enough to understand that there's no handy solution) or reduce my headcount/make my business less labor intensive.  Since every employee is integral to our customer service, reducing headcount is certain to decrease customer satisfaction, which, all things being equal, impacts sales.

Simply put, we are a business that cannot survive a large spike in the minimum wage.  We're not curing cancer, so the world won't suffer greatly if we shut our doors, but 35+ happy and reasonably well compensated employees will be out of work, my landlord will suffer from the loss of a long-standing tenant, my vendors will not have my business, and my personal spending will decline significantly.

I understand I am not the kind of business people decry when advocating for minimum wage increases, but I am out there and there are lots of others in similar positions.  It may be correct to say that the large companies can absorb the increased costs, and if that is true, we may find ourselves with nothing but large companies left - mom and pop's (at least ones like mine) simply cannot survive in a sudden $13+ minimum wage world.

I don't know what the answer is, but the issue is not as clear cut as some on this board make it out to be.
2013-11-28 05:37:16 PM
2 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: The market is what the market is.  You cannot legislate the market to behave the way you want any more than you can legislate the tide to come in at a different time.  It's childish magical thinking to believe otherwise.


This reminds me of a quote!

"While the earnings of a minority are growing exponentially, so too is the gap separating the majority from the prosperity enjoyed by those happy few. This imbalance is the result of ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation. Consequently, they reject the right of states, charged with vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control. A new tyranny is thus born, invisible and often virtual, which unilaterally and relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules. ... In this system, which tends to devour everything which stands in the way of increased profits, whatever is fragile, like the environment, is defenseless before the interests of a deified market, which become the only rule."

 - Pope "Goddamn" Francis
2013-11-28 04:20:30 PM
2 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: The market is what the market is.  You cannot legislate the market to behave the way you want any more than you can legislate the tide to come in at a different time.  It's childish magical thinking to believe otherwise.


So let's never try to improve labor conditions, it's "childish magical thinking."

Uh-huh.
2013-11-28 04:16:00 PM
2 votes:

bigsteve3OOO: That is why it exists.


The Employment Policies Institute (EPI) is one of several front groups created by Berman & Co., a Washington, DC public affairs firm owned by Rick Berman, who lobbies for the restaurant, hotel, alcoholic beverage and tobacco industries.

What a surprise EPI is against raising the minimum wage!
2013-11-28 02:56:13 PM
2 votes:
OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*
2013-11-28 09:27:03 AM
2 votes:
Whoever wrote that should be fired

Minimum wage was voted to $9.19 an hour while the city of SeaTac voted for $15 an hour for those who are employed by the airport
2013-11-29 11:06:25 AM
1 votes:

dangelder: In July 2007, the federal minimum was $5.15. In July 2009 it was $7.25, a jump of 41% in just two years. I don't recall any serious economic trouble during that time period.


Well there was no major economic turmoil after that minimum wage increase, or after the one before that, or the one before that, or the one before that but the next minimum wage increase will definitely cause the US economy to collapse into a dystopian hellhole. The GOP mouthbreathing economic prognosticators will finally be right this time
2013-11-29 11:03:34 AM
1 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

If there is no profit, why am I investing all my money and 80 hours of my time per week?

So I'm assuming you feel that a business owner is entitled to some return on investment if not, well then you're an uneducatable semi literate child and should hold your tongue while the adults speak.

That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then  there simply won't be any profits. they will become 57% of expenses.


/math, how does it work?
2013-11-29 05:25:17 AM
1 votes:
In July 2007, the federal minimum was $5.15. In July 2009 it was $7.25, a jump of 41% in just two years. I don't recall any serious economic trouble during that time period.
2013-11-29 05:12:03 AM
1 votes:

Unemployedingreenland: I have a small business and employ about 35 part timers - all college and high school students.  We pay about 15% above minimum wage because I don't want to compete with McD's for my labor pool.  We have no direct competition in the area (we are a particular kind of family amusement business), but there is plenty of indirect competition - everything from other venue based entertainment options - bowling, movies, etc. - to gaming systems, Netflix, etc, to just hanging out at someone's house.  Labor is my single largest expense, and eats approx 35% of revenue.  We are also significantly more labor intensive than my indirect competitors.  Our margins are OK (15%-20%) - not great, but so long as we have a sufficient level of revenue, I can make a decent living for me and my family.

In my state, there is talk of raising the minimum wage to about $13/hr, which would increase my labor costs 50%+.  Regardless of business acumen, there's simply no way to pass that additional cost on to my customers.  We have particular "sticky" price points - $19.99 (no really), and $199.99 (again, really).  No matter how we sell, bundle or package things, once the cost per person hits $20 (or the cost per party/group/event hits $200), we see a significant dropoff in sales.  In other words, people seem to be ok with spending less than $20/$200, but there's a widely-held understanding that $20+/$200+ is too much and there's a visceral aversion to spending that much or more on what we offer.

So if my labor costs increase 50%, my margins go negative unless I can somehow overcome this $20/$200 issue (and we've been doing this long enough to understand that there's no handy solution) or reduce my headcount/make my business less labor intensive.  Since every employee is integral to our customer service, reducing headcount is certain to decrease customer satisfaction, which, all things being equal, impacts sales.

Simply put, we are a business that cannot survive a large spike in the minimum wage ...



Have you considered calculating the basic fact that an increased minimum wage means more disposable income which means increased customers/sales for your amusement business? You are not a fixed/essential service so you can only profit when people have left over money to spend on you after they have paid all their bills. In other words, you WANT wages to go up. You NEED wages to go up. If wages don't go up, there will be nobody around with any money to spend on your recreation.
2013-11-29 03:00:22 AM
1 votes:

SCUBA_Archer: If business owners buy million dollar cranes to hoist 10 times the material that men could hoist previously, should they be responsible for increasing pay tenfold for the remaining workers in spite of their capital equipment outlay to keep that graph even?  It makes no sense.


Not necessarily a tenfold increase, but Adam Smith's famous 'Pin Factory' analogy says the remaining workers should see a pay increase, since they are producing the same amount with 1/10th of the personnel needed. The wage stagnation problem has come about because employers are cutting wages for the remaining employees and telling them to appreciate the crumbs they are dealt while funnelling the rest of that profit increase into the pockets of CEO's and upper management.
For example:
I used to work in radio. To make the math easy, let's say I was paid $10/hr to be 'on-air' for four hours a day. That's $200 per week. Now, with the invention of 'voice tracking' (pre-recording the parts where the DJ talks), I can record all content for the week in about 2 hours, which means the employer can get $200 worth of product (me) for $20 as far as straight-up hourly wage is concerned. Does that mean my contribution (talking about music and events) is worth less, simply because the technology makes it easier and faster to provide? I don't think so. Besides the product suffers when there's not a live person there to talk to listeners, give breaking news updates, and adjust the programming in real time. But I digress...

/The above is a gross oversimplification
//Also why I don't work in radio anymore
2013-11-28 11:51:31 PM
1 votes:
Ah, market fundamentalism. This thread is full of it.

Legislating against market forces is futile and racist! Capitalism has no self-destructive tendencies and massive income inequalities created by market forces have never no historical precedent of creating social upheaval that led to massive amounts of pain and suffering, if not the continued existence of capitalism itself. Just let the market do it's thing.
2013-11-28 11:38:38 PM
1 votes:

aneki: whidbey: dinch: whidbey: dinch: , but how the hell can a business like that support $15 an hour

Dairy Queen is a good example of a business where the cost of their product is well under a dollar per burger, and probably less for cases of fries, ice cream and other stuff.

They can afford a wage increase. They don't want to because they make more money without having to.

I get that, I really do. Thing is, $45 an hour plus insurance (not health, just the basic' if anybody accidentally mixes bleach and chlorine'), product, equipment, rent and then what you're losing to the kids that are being kids... I just don't see how that could be viable.

Well, you're welcome to break it down for me. And I seriously doubt that kids sneaking a burger or an ice cream cone is a major factor in business costs.

If Dairy Queen is making enough profit to stay well afloat, then they can afford a wage increase.

And it's been pointed out here, if you can't put that cost into your business plan, it's stupid to blame a wage increase on your inability to succeed in the market. And I know that's going to piss some armchair economists here off. Good.

Um, if you look it up the average Dairy Queen Franchise owner makes about $70k.  So let's double their labor cost... they'd have to increase the prices on the menu.  If they did nothing and just ate it the franchise owner would be making minimum wage.  And who in their right mind would want to put up with all the headaches of owning a business for minimum wage?  If you've never owned a business, you have no freaking idea what it's like to have to deal with all the red tape around running a legitimate business.  Add to that what a pain in the ass most people are to work with as employees and well... yeah, at a certain point the businesses would just shut down.


What about the increase in profits due to the fact that all the minimum wage workers who work near a Dairy Queen will spend more at Dairy Queen?
2013-11-28 11:21:05 PM
1 votes:

whidbey: BMulligan: There's a chain of burger joints here in Seattle which starts their employees at $10.25/hour, which is substantially less than $15 of course (although well above the minimum wage), but they also provide 100% employer paid health insurance, child care assistance of up to $8,000/year, and college tuition assistance of up to $5,500/year. They've been in business for over 50 years, and the family that owns the company lives quite well. It is possible to treat employees like human beings and still make a reasonable profit.

In other words, anti-living wage people:

Eat a bag of Dicks.


and like Batman, their true identity . . .
2013-11-28 06:16:00 PM
1 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

If there is no profit, why am I investing all my money and 80 hours of my time per week?

So I'm assuming you feel that a business owner is entitled to some return on investment if not, well then you're an uneducatable semi literate child and should hold your tongue while the adults speak.

That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then there simply won't be any profits.


If labor costs are half of expanses, and they double, that tells us nothing about how much profit is left, because you've told us nothing about what percentage of your revenue your expenses are.

And if labor costs are 40% of your revenue, and you aren't a high end consultancy, then you suck at business and deserve to close. I can't even conceive of a business that both employs minimum wage workers and has 40% of revenue tied up in labor cost.
2013-11-28 06:13:08 PM
1 votes:

BlastYoBoots: Mr. Eugenides: The market is what the market is.  You cannot legislate the market to behave the way you want any more than you can legislate the tide to come in at a different time.  It's childish magical thinking to believe otherwise.

This reminds me of a quote!

"While the earnings of a minority are growing exponentially, so too is the gap separating the majority from the prosperity enjoyed by those happy few. This imbalance is the result of ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation. Consequently, they reject the right of states, charged with vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control. A new tyranny is thus born, invisible and often virtual, which unilaterally and relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules. ... In this system, which tends to devour everything which stands in the way of increased profits, whatever is fragile, like the environment, is defenseless before the interests of a deified market, which become the only rule."

 - Pope "Goddamn" Francis


I was raised evangelical (Baptist) and consider myself an atheist, but I am warming up to this Pope the more I hear from him.  While I can not see myself converting, I have to give him credit for taking my view of the Church up a notch or two.  Certainly a more compassionate and reasonable man than his predecessor who looked and sounded like Darth Cheney's long lost brother.
2013-11-28 06:07:50 PM
1 votes:
SeaTac just saw the cost of fast food go up a shiat ton along with other items.  Good luck to the "the corporations will eat the increased labor costs" people like 

super_grass: dinch: Maybe it's because I'm thinking of my first real job at minimum wage, which was at a Dairy Queen, but how the hell can a business like that support $15 an hour? You've got three kids working (all of which are most likely eating into your whipped cream profits via whippits) selling cheap crap, plus the rest of your overhead. I just don't get it

Seatac is a small suburb with a major airport. I'm guessing that the stores in the airport will just raise their prices and the ones outside will move a mile or two away from it.

What I don't get is that it's a damn suburb. The cost of living there can't be that high compared to downtown Seattle.


Because minimum wage increases by and large benefit middle-class teenagers more so than they do the working poor.
2013-11-28 05:51:07 PM
1 votes:

Somaticasual: BlastYoBoots: Pope "Goddamn" Francis

The respect for the new pope grows daily...

//seriously, if pope francis makes it even a couple of years without a "mysterious tragedy"  he'll have made more difference than the last 5 to 10 men in his position. That being said, challenging the money AND the moneymakers is a dangerous game in the catholic church. The mafia thing almost feels like childs play in comparison..


Yeah. I couldn't finish reading that article about the pope's apostolic exhortation to my mother without her lamenting about a dozen different times that this pope was going to get offed any day now. It's like he's way too good to be true, and we're so used to not being able to have nice things like a decent pope that we expect him snatched away in the next moment.
2013-11-28 05:44:04 PM
1 votes:

BlastYoBoots: Pope "Goddamn" Francis


The respect for the new pope grows daily...

//seriously, if pope francis makes it even a couple of years without a "mysterious tragedy"  he'll have made more difference than the last 5 to 10 men in his position. That being said, challenging the money AND the moneymakers is a dangerous game in the catholic church. The mafia thing almost feels like childs play in comparison..
2013-11-28 05:35:56 PM
1 votes:

bigsteve3OOO: For the shortsighted:  This will hurt minorities.   That is why it exists.  Keep supporting racist policies democrat party.  You fools.


Minorities did great when the GOP utopia of no minimum wage was the standard in the US... I mean, they did so well on those plantations that they never owed anything for rent, food, or whatever, and they were always on time with their bills.
2013-11-28 04:56:06 PM
1 votes:

neilbradley: I remember being paid $3.25/hr for my first job in 1985. That rate today is around $7.80/hr. So they're getting more than double the rate of inflation.


But gold in 1985 was less than $327/oz

Today it's $1240/oz.  Therefore your $3.25 1985 in gold should  $12.95 now,  so $15 is just 25% more than inflation
2013-11-28 04:45:55 PM
1 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: Mr. Eugenides: The market is what the market is.  You cannot legislate the market to behave the way you want any more than you can legislate the tide to come in at a different time.  It's childish magical thinking to believe otherwise.

So let's never try to improve labor conditions, it's "childish magical thinking."

Uh-huh.

Know which logical fallacy you just engaged in?


Because appealing to some vague authority like Your Law of Economics isn't a fallacious argument.
2013-11-28 04:15:53 PM
1 votes:

Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

If there is no profit, why am I investing all my money and 80 hours of my time per week?

So I'm assuming you feel that a business owner is entitled to some return on investment if not, well then you're an uneducatable semi literate child and should hold your tongue while the adults speak.

That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then there simply won't be any profits.


You're welcome to show evidence how raising the wage to $15 is going to hurt ANY of the huge corps that operate out of Sea-Tac. I'll wait.

So I'm assuming

Yes you are. You are assuming that huge corporations that hire people for shiat wages aren't doing well, and couldn't absorb a real cost of living adjustment.
2013-11-28 04:06:51 PM
1 votes:

Prophet of Loss: Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

If there is no profit, why am I investing all my money and 80 hours of my time per week?

So I'm assuming you feel that a business owner is entitled to some return on investment if not, well then you're an uneducatable semi literate child and should hold your tongue while the adults speak.

That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then there simply won't be any profits.

1. We are talking about minimum wage, so its service jobs.

2. You can raise prices. Your competition is in the same boat and under the same pressures as you.

If your business acumen is so weak you can't pay a living wage and stay in business then maybe you should do something else and leave running a successful business to 'the adults'.


Yep.

If a business can't cover its cost, the model isn't viable.
2013-11-28 04:04:11 PM
1 votes:
I hope this doesn't cause shops and restaurants in airports to charge a lot more than those elsewhere.
2013-11-28 03:48:20 PM
1 votes:
Nothing wrong with a recount when it is that close, subby.  If anything it should be mandatory at that point.
2013-11-28 03:45:17 PM
1 votes:

jst3p: Mr. Eugenides:
That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then there simply won't be any profits.

Good thing that isn't anything close to what is happening then.


Yes, but if they were, it would be bad.

So this is bad, too.

Don't you see?
2013-11-28 03:34:13 PM
1 votes:

vicioushobbit: Mr. Eugenides: whidbey: OK I predict this thread is going to be about "oh the poor poor employers who have to cough up extra $$$ that takes away from their PROFITS."

*read in a Ferengi voice*

If there is no profit, why am I investing all my money and 80 hours of my time per week?

So I'm assuming you feel that a business owner is entitled to some return on investment if not, well then you're an uneducatable semi literate child and should hold your tongue while the adults speak.

That said, if labor costs are 40% of expenses and they double then there simply won't be any profits.

Think of all the new people with higher wages who can suddenly afford your product/ service.


That would only make a difference if we were a demand-economy.

/trickles
2013-11-28 03:31:31 PM
1 votes:

shower_in_my_socks: A low minimum wage is just another example of corporate welfare. Companies benefit from not having to pay workers a livable wage, knowing that the government will pick up the difference via social programs. Being against socialism, but also against raising the minimum wage, is like being against abortion, but not wanting people to use birth control either.


They are against that , too.
2013-11-28 03:04:38 PM
1 votes:
blogs.ubc.ca
 
Displayed 49 of 49 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report