If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Gawker)   So what is moral authority Ken Starr up to these days? Oh, just lobbying to get a serial pedophile released   (gawker.com) divider line 153
    More: Sick, Ken Starr, Washingtonians  
•       •       •

3940 clicks; posted to Politics » on 16 Nov 2013 at 12:50 AM (35 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



153 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-11-16 08:57:13 AM
Why does anyone believe Starr was either a moral authority or anything other than a wanking douchebag? He had exactly one point to prove and he couldn't prove it. What he did do is introduce a whole huge report that had little to do with the point he was trying to make, but instead served as a tawdry wank piece.
 
2013-11-16 08:59:53 AM

UNAUTHORIZED FINGER: Shedim: Noam Chimpsky: quatchi: Who the fark is his guy that he could get so many high profile players to vouch for him in a court of law?

I mean Sanduski had a D-List celebrity thing going on so I sort of got why some idiots stuck up for him but this guy? WTF?

You're thinking he was providing the young pussy for the elite? The thought crossed my mind.

Oh man... I can't even begin to imagine how nasty things would get if that were true. How high would such a thing go?

All the way to the top?


Your source reads like conspiracy theory fanfic. My application of Occam's Razor suggests that it never happened; there is no way something like that could be kept "blacked out" for 30 years. Ad IF this documentary is genuine, why hasn't it exploded across every major and minor internet site? Why is it still mouldering away in some tiny backwater site that hardly anyone knows exists?
 
2013-11-16 08:59:53 AM

coffeeplease: Oh boy you Farklibs are digging real deep to try to offset the Obamacare fiasco.


Fark never pointed out Republicans being scumbaggy hypocrites before Obamacare rolled out a buggy website. This is totally 'offsetting', and not 'business as usual'.
 
2013-11-16 09:03:37 AM

readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time.



No, he wasn't.  He was involved in the fishing expedition the republicans put  in place to discredit a democratic president.  The goal was to find something damaging that would stick, they started with Whitewater and it ended with a blowjob.

This is the same strategy the republicans are using with Obama, and they'll be back at it full force once the issues with the marketplace website are corrected.
 
2013-11-16 09:04:35 AM
Let me know when Fox news puts (D) behind his name, then I will know he is the worst kind of evil.
Being a pedophile = acceptable, being a democrat = unacceptable, Being a democrat president = lock him up
 
2013-11-16 09:06:00 AM
Whew, good thing I despise everyone in DC.

/ahead of the curve.
 
2013-11-16 09:08:30 AM

Shedim: UNAUTHORIZED FINGER: Shedim: Noam Chimpsky: quatchi: Who the fark is his guy that he could get so many high profile players to vouch for him in a court of law?

I mean Sanduski had a D-List celebrity thing going on so I sort of got why some idiots stuck up for him but this guy? WTF?

You're thinking he was providing the young pussy for the elite? The thought crossed my mind.

Oh man... I can't even begin to imagine how nasty things would get if that were true. How high would such a thing go?

All the way to the top?

Your source reads like conspiracy theory fanfic. My application of Occam's Razor suggests that it never happened; there is no way something like that could be kept "blacked out" for 30 years. Ad IF this documentary is genuine, why hasn't it exploded across every major and minor internet site? Why is it still mouldering away in some tiny backwater site that hardly anyone knows exists?


Yes, it kinda does. Here's a Google   search for you to make up your own mind. All I know is that we'll never know for sure.
 
2013-11-16 09:13:58 AM
What a bunch of assholes. Every one of these shiatstains who wrote a letter defending this cockhole. They're all seemingly incapable of empathy. Just imagine if it had been one of their daughters, think they'd still feel the same about this guy?
 
2013-11-16 09:24:09 AM
Here's a not very controversial idea from my perspective as an armchair psychologist: pedophilia is a sexual orientation, much like homosexuality. That doesn't change the fact that sexual contact with underage children is absurdly exploitative and deserves to be a felony.
 
ecl
2013-11-16 09:28:59 AM

Maturin: Ken Starr has been morally bankrupt since the 90's.

Pedophiles victimize the most vulnerable, and this guy was in a position of trust.

but...

I have always assumed that belief in rehabilitation was a more liberal than conservative bias. And while not everyone thinks pedophilia can be cured, it does seem that it can be at least controlled. Is it such an awful thing that Starr thinks this guy deserves a bit of a break?

I cringe every time some Bible thumping conservative talks about how we are a Christian nation, and that godly men and women founded this country. Yet these same idiots want to lock up non-violent criminals for life, cut funding for prison education, and demand that felons lose their right to vote. So much for forgiveness and redemption.

So if Ken Starr shows a little heart, and suggests that a 74 year old man be released to community service instead of spending the rest of his life in prison, maybe he shouldn't be pilloried for practicing a Christian ethic for once.


You are dogsh*t.
 
2013-11-16 09:36:07 AM

whidbey: Well, they'll be looking back on a surprisingly strong and robust Presidency. That's different.


Wow, what drugs do you take to foster such delusions?

Alphax: violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.

But then, It's OK If You Are A Republican.  IOKIYAAR.  Any rule, any law.


Starr is non-partisan despite the derpish claims. He's worked for Democrat child molester Jeffrey Epstein, Blackwater, ACLU, NRA, and Pro-Prop 8.

He's a lawyer if you start assigning motives other than survival to them, you humanize them.
 
2013-11-16 09:39:55 AM

Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?


Do tell.
What is a Polanskicrat?
 
2013-11-16 09:43:35 AM

Maturin: Ken Starr has been morally bankrupt since the 90's.

Pedophiles victimize the most vulnerable, and this guy was in a position of trust.

but...

I have always assumed that belief in rehabilitation was a more liberal than conservative bias. And while not everyone thinks pedophilia can be cured, it does seem that it can be at least controlled. Is it such an awful thing that Starr thinks this guy deserves a bit of a break?

I cringe every time some Bible thumping conservative talks about how we are a Christian nation, and that godly men and women founded this country. Yet these same idiots want to lock up non-violent criminals for life, cut funding for prison education, and demand that felons lose their right to vote. So much for forgiveness and redemption.

So if Ken Starr shows a little heart, and suggests that a 74 year old man be released to community service instead of spending the rest of his life in prison, maybe he shouldn't be pilloried for practicing a Christian ethic for once.


Say that again after a bastard like this molests one of your children, and I'll listen.
 
2013-11-16 09:46:20 AM

Serious Black: Here's a not very controversial idea from my perspective as an armchair psychologist: pedophilia is a sexual orientation, much like homosexuality. That doesn't change the fact that sexual contact with underage children is absurdly exploitative and deserves to be a felony.


Some have stated that, publicly, so you get a 3/10 . Higher marks would have been given if you had at least one clicky source.


Look, some do like them young. I dont understand that because most of my conversation with kids is "put that down ""where is your parent" "its a pill, not a suppository " ( the last was to some 20 something who asked about the womens libido pills at the counter . ) . So I could never even imagine having enough  of a conversation to even go... there. And I have watched too many kids grow up- it just grosses me out. Thats just me though- the Gods know there are plenty of peds out there.
 
2013-11-16 10:06:34 AM
Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.

ps.  if you wish to complain about a special prosecutor being political, look no further than Lawrence Walsh.
 
2013-11-16 10:06:41 AM

mongbiohazard: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

I know this is crazy and all... but you should probably RTFA.


Hell, he should probably start by reading the headline.
 
2013-11-16 10:14:42 AM

alienated: Serious Black: Here's a not very controversial idea from my perspective as an armchair psychologist: pedophilia is a sexual orientation, much like homosexuality. That doesn't change the fact that sexual contact with underage children is absurdly exploitative and deserves to be a felony.

Some have stated that, publicly, so you get a 3/10 . Higher marks would have been given if you had at least one clicky source.


Look, some do like them young. I dont understand that because most of my conversation with kids is "put that down ""where is your parent" "its a pill, not a suppository " ( the last was to some 20 something who asked about the womens libido pills at the counter . ) . So I could never even imagine having enough  of a conversation to even go... there. And I have watched too many kids grow up- it just grosses me out. Thats just me though- the Gods know there are plenty of peds out there.


Yes, people think abhorrent things. It sucks. But people have freedom of thought. People have a right to ethical independence. Those rights end where the kid's right to not be exploited are violated. Possible analogy: is it cheating if I am married and fantasize about having sex with Scarlett Johansson?

/if this is making no sense, I blame waking up with sandwiches
 
ecl
2013-11-16 10:25:25 AM

Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.


Is he standing up for a pedophile?  That's what people are mad about.
 
2013-11-16 10:27:15 AM

Serious Black: alienated: Serious Black: Here's a not very controversial idea from my perspective as an armchair psychologist: pedophilia is a sexual orientation, much like homosexuality. That doesn't change the fact that sexual contact with underage children is absurdly exploitative and deserves to be a felony.

Some have stated that, publicly, so you get a 3/10 . Higher marks would have been given if you had at least one clicky source.


Look, some do like them young. I dont understand that because most of my conversation with kids is "put that down ""where is your parent" "its a pill, not a suppository " ( the last was to some 20 something who asked about the womens libido pills at the counter . ) . So I could never even imagine having enough  of a conversation to even go... there. And I have watched too many kids grow up- it just grosses me out. Thats just me though- the Gods know there are plenty of peds out there.

Yes, people think abhorrent things. It sucks. But people have freedom of thought. People have a right to ethical independence. Those rights end where the kid's right to not be exploited are violated. Possible analogy: is it cheating if I am married and fantasize about having sex with Scarlett Johansson?

/if this is making no sense, I blame waking up with sandwiches


Or here's an alternate view that involves treating these kinds of thoughts as obsessions in done cases:

http://m.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/obsessive-thoughts-a- d arker-side-of-ocd/281260/
 
2013-11-16 10:28:33 AM
readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell


You have a lot of faith.
 
2013-11-16 10:29:58 AM

Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately


Asking for leniency for a rapist pedophile will get you placed onto the "loves rapist pedophiles" list.  Especially when you then try to rationalize his behavior.

That is only fair.
 
2013-11-16 10:31:22 AM

Uranus Is Huge!: tbeatty: lawboy87:

*And if you believe that he actually molested 10 young girls over a period of nearly 20 yrs and just suddenly gave up the practice - then he is way out of the norm according to all the research I have ever read about pedophiles.  Much more likely, statistically speaking, is that the prosecutors were simply unable to unearth more victims from post 1985, not that they don't exist or he had abandoned his little "hobby."

I didn't read 10 girls, but 10 incidents with 4 victims  and a narrow range of age between 12 and 14.  You should be able to use your razor intellect to deduce that the age range, stopping and lack of victims coupled with your extensive research, would lead away from assessing him as a pedophile.  Same with Polansky.  If you knew anything at all, you should at least be able to distinguish pedophilia (interest in pre-pubescent children) from other paraphilia's that don't fall in that category.  Doesn't mean he isn't a rapist or sex offender, but slapping a label like 'pedophile' without understanding what it means and then implying he must behave as pedophiles behave is simply stupid.  Please go let Wikipedia form an opinion for you so you can at least understand the terms.  Then let Occam's Razor apply what you learned.

You're typing an awful lot of words to defend an admitted child rapist.

Is there something you'd like to share with the class?


Yeah the rationalization here is really creepy. Maybe he should have a seat over there.
 
2013-11-16 10:37:04 AM
But but but Polanski. Eat scheiße and die Republican troll kiddie molester apologists. Always remembering that Clinton got a blowjob and 0bama's website didn't work perfectly.
 
2013-11-16 10:38:00 AM

red5ish: Sorry, I failed.


Eh, it happens. Good on you for manning up instead of doubling down.
 
2013-11-16 10:38:18 AM

Kevin72: But but but Polanski. Eat scheiße and die Republican troll kiddie molester apologists. Always remembering that Clinton got a blowjob and 0bama's website didn't work perfectly.


Oh yeah, and don't forget BENGHAZI.
 
2013-11-16 10:43:28 AM

Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.

ps.  if you wish to complain about a special prosecutor being political, look no further than Lawrence Walsh.


"Mr. Kloman is currently repenting for his past sins and will continue to do so if given a chance to serve his community and neighbors. Community service would be a far better punishment than having him languish in jail."
 
2013-11-16 10:47:18 AM
 
2013-11-16 10:50:57 AM

Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.

ps.  if you wish to complain about a special prosecutor being political, look no further than Lawrence Walsh.


He was already convicted and sentenced to 43 years in prison. after serving less than a year, Ken Starr specifically asked that his sentence be commuted to community service.

...which would release him from prison.
 
2013-11-16 11:24:48 AM

Maturin: maybe he shouldn't be pilloried for practicing a Christian ethic for once.


You're just asking Fark to label Christians as pedophiles, but I bet you already knew that.
 
2013-11-16 11:28:19 AM

Les Comdien Masque: it seems likely that there were more than the four he admitted to


That is always the case. Always.
 
2013-11-16 11:32:10 AM

Uranus Is Huge!: You're typing an awful lot of words to defend an admitted child rapist.

Is there something you'd like to share with the class?


Tbeatty is a pretty hardcore troll.  For him, it's all about the trolling, not the subject matter.
 
2013-11-16 11:39:56 AM

Sgt Otter: Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.

ps.  if you wish to complain about a special prosecutor being political, look no further than Lawrence Walsh.

He was already convicted and sentenced to 43 years in prison. after serving less than a year, Ken Starr specifically asked that his sentence be commuted to community service.

...which would release him from prison.


You must be using Obama's time machine.  The dude was sentenced on October 18, 2013.  The letter in question was written on September 17, 2013 for the purpose of having the judge consider it when imposing sentence.
 
2013-11-16 11:53:45 AM

Cataholic: Sgt Otter: Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.

ps.  if you wish to complain about a special prosecutor being political, look no further than Lawrence Walsh.

He was already convicted and sentenced to 43 years in prison. after serving less than a year, Ken Starr specifically asked that his sentence be commuted to community service.

...which would release him from prison.

You must be using Obama's time machine.  The dude was sentenced on October 18, 2013.  The letter in question was written on September 17, 2013 for the purpose of having the judge consider it when imposing sentence.


FTA:  Community service would be a far better punishment than having him languish in jail.

He's asking for community service instead of jail time.
 
2013-11-16 12:00:04 PM

Cataholic: if you wish to complain about a special prosecutor being political, look no further than Lawrence Walsh.


Comparing Iran-Contra to BJgate?

Wow.
 
2013-11-16 12:15:58 PM

gingerjet: stoli n coke: Ken Starr was not the pedophile's attorney. He was a family friend who wrote the judge asking for leniency for a repeat child molester. He voluntarily told a judge that he thought a man who molested several girls under 14 had learned his lesson and was totally trustworthy.

I personally believe that Ken Starr has a large amount of actual honor (unlike most lawyers ... or Republicans).  My favorite bit bout Ken Starr is the fact that after he finished up his report on the Clinton investigation is that he sent his report to Congress via a truck and didn't notify them in advance.  Just threw it on their doorstep and walked away.  The House Republicans were furious.




So what the result any how? Was Clinton guilty in the Whitewater thing or not?

Can you summarize the 6 year investigation in one sentence?
 
2013-11-16 12:37:37 PM

TedCruz'sCrazyDad: Can you summarize the 6 year investigation in one sentence?


How about two words? "Witch hunt."

/Mmm. Those two words were worth hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars!
 
2013-11-16 01:09:20 PM

Fuggin Bizzy: TedCruz'sCrazyDad: Can you summarize the 6 year investigation in one sentence?

How about two words? "Witch hunt."

/Mmm. Those two words were worth hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars!


But hey, they got to give Clinton shiat for getting a blowjob! So totally worth it.
 
2013-11-16 01:16:43 PM

Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.

ps.  if you wish to complain about a special prosecutor being political, look no further than Lawrence Walsh.


I know you're a trolling douche, but please ask yourself this:
Is this what you've come to?  Is this what you're willing to support?  Defending a pedophile?  Asking for a pedophile to be able to avoid jail time?  Do you have a single friend or relative that you'd be willing to tell them that you spend your day on the internet asking for a pedophile to be released from jail?

Are you really this pathetic of an individual?
 
2013-11-16 01:44:31 PM

Mrbogey: whidbey: Well, they'll be looking back on a surprisingly strong and robust Presidency. That's different.

Wow, what drugs do you take to foster such delusions?

Alphax: violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.

But then, It's OK If You Are A Republican.  IOKIYAAR.  Any rule, any law.

Starr is non-partisan despite the derpish claims. He's worked for Democrat child molester Jeffrey Epstein, Blackwater, ACLU, NRA, and Pro-Prop 8.

He's a lawyer if you start assigning motives other than survival to them, you humanize them.


You actually call someone delusional and then claim that Ken Starr is non-partisan?

Just wow.
 
2013-11-16 01:57:30 PM

Halli: Mrbogey: whidbey: Well, they'll be looking back on a surprisingly strong and robust Presidency. That's different.

Wow, what drugs do you take to foster such delusions?

Alphax: violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.

But then, It's OK If You Are A Republican.  IOKIYAAR.  Any rule, any law.

Starr is non-partisan despite the derpish claims. He's worked for Democrat child molester Jeffrey Epstein, Blackwater, ACLU, NRA, and Pro-Prop 8.

He's a lawyer if you start assigning motives other than survival to them, you humanize them.

You actually call someone delusional and then claim that Ken Starr is non-partisan?

Just wow.


He's also delusional enough to make the mistake that Starr was acting in a professional capacity as this guy's attorney.  In this situation Starr is pleading with the judge to grant a child rapist community service rather than jail time as a farking character witness.
 
2013-11-16 03:22:01 PM

Fart_Machine: He's also delusional enough to make the mistake that Starr was acting in a professional capacity as this guy's attorney. In this situation Starr is pleading with the judge to grant a child rapist community service rather than jail time as a farking character witness.


That is incorrect and evidence of your own delusion. I never stated he was representing the molester as an attorney. I referenced the incidents where he represented or worked with various people and organizations to highlight his non-partisan nature. Ken Starr "needs" to be a partisan shill for the "Clinton deifiers" crowd to dismiss Clinton's "indiscretions".
 
2013-11-16 04:31:55 PM

Fart_Machine: Halli: Mrbogey: whidbey: Well, they'll be looking back on a surprisingly strong and robust Presidency. That's different.

Wow, what drugs do you take to foster such delusions?

Alphax: violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.

But then, It's OK If You Are A Republican.  IOKIYAAR.  Any rule, any law.

Starr is non-partisan despite the derpish claims. He's worked for Democrat child molester Jeffrey Epstein, Blackwater, ACLU, NRA, and Pro-Prop 8.

He's a lawyer if you start assigning motives other than survival to them, you humanize them.

You actually call someone delusional and then claim that Ken Starr is non-partisan?

Just wow.

He's also delusional enough to make the mistake that Starr was acting in a professional capacity as this guy's attorney.  In this situation Starr 's wife is pleading with the judge to grant a child rapist time served + community service rather than jail time as a farking character witness.

 
2013-11-16 04:32:04 PM

Mrbogey: Fart_Machine: He's also delusional enough to make the mistake that Starr was acting in a professional capacity as this guy's attorney. In this situation Starr is pleading with the judge to grant a child rapist community service rather than jail time as a farking character witness.

That is incorrect and evidence of your own delusion. I never stated he was representing the molester as an attorney. I referenced the incidents where he represented or worked with various people and organizations to highlight his non-partisan nature. Ken Starr "needs" to be a partisan shill for the "Clinton deifiers" crowd to dismiss Clinton's "indiscretions".


Yeah so far you've demonstrated that he is a gun for hire, but before that he was appointed by Reagan and was solicitor general for Bush Sr. But it's nice to know he's branching out and supporting community service for child rapists.
 
2013-11-16 04:36:43 PM

utharda: Stile4aly: I attended Potomac for High School with Kloman's son and Ken Starr's son.  In fact, I lived about a half mile from Starr.  I think it's a terrible shame that all this support is being expressed for someone who confessed to these crimes and it reflects very poorly on a school that I really loved.

Mclean was pretty farked up wasn't it.


It took me a little while to figure out the McLean wasn't a representative sample of the universe.  The revelation was so shocking it turned me into a Democrat!
 
2013-11-16 04:49:44 PM

tbeatty: Fart_Machine: Halli: Mrbogey: whidbey: Well, they'll be looking back on a surprisingly strong and robust Presidency. That's different.

Wow, what drugs do you take to foster such delusions?

Alphax: violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.

But then, It's OK If You Are A Republican.  IOKIYAAR.  Any rule, any law.

Starr is non-partisan despite the derpish claims. He's worked for Democrat child molester Jeffrey Epstein, Blackwater, ACLU, NRA, and Pro-Prop 8.

He's a lawyer if you start assigning motives other than survival to them, you humanize them.

You actually call someone delusional and then claim that Ken Starr is non-partisan?

Just wow.

He's also delusional enough to make the mistake that Starr was acting in a professional capacity as this guy's attorney.  In this situation Starr 's wife is pleading with the judge to grant a child rapist time served + community service rather than jail time as a farking character witness.


So you're saying that he didnt know what he was signing?
 
2013-11-16 05:32:44 PM

Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.


So, raping children is okay when it's your side doing it?
 
2013-11-16 05:53:30 PM

tbeatty: He signed a letter his wife wrote asking that 70 y/o man be given community service for crimes that ended 30 years ago.  Sorry if I can't generate poutrage over this.  The butthurt over the definition of 'is' seems to still smolder in certain Democratic circle jerks.


Wife-like typing detected?

Really?

That's what you're going with in defense of a pedo who was empowered with community trust to work with children who got away with child molestation and rape for years?

The false equivalency thing with Clinton thing was dumb enough for one post you didn't hafta totally destroy any semblance of being anything other than an AWing troll by doing that too.
 
2013-11-16 05:55:27 PM

Ed Grubermann: Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.

So, raping children is okay when it's your side doing it?


Roman Polanski and his side say "Yes."
 
2013-11-16 06:09:35 PM
One of his last gigs was representing tattoo parlors

Classy guy

Off my lawn
 
2013-11-16 06:21:39 PM

tbeatty: Ed Grubermann: Cataholic: Asking for leniency in sentencing is not the same as asking someone to be freed immediately.  But don't let that get in the way of your rage-on.

So, raping children is okay when it's your side doing it?

Roman Polanski and his side say "Yes."


B-b-b-but Polanski!
 
Displayed 50 of 153 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report