If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Gawker)   So what is moral authority Ken Starr up to these days? Oh, just lobbying to get a serial pedophile released   (gawker.com) divider line 153
    More: Sick, Ken Starr, Washingtonians  
•       •       •

3956 clicks; posted to Politics » on 16 Nov 2013 at 12:50 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



153 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-11-16 03:13:58 AM  

readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell


i.imgur.com
 
2013-11-16 03:15:29 AM  
Useful idiot for the Right-wing extra-constitutional usurpers. Move along, citizen. Nothing to see here.
 
2013-11-16 03:17:17 AM  

Empty Matchbook: Empty Matchbook: whidbey: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell

Are you sure you aren't in it now?

Approve

Someday I'll learn the proper use of PREVIEW...or Fark will have it not post if an image is being thrown out. So! TAKE 2!!

[film.thedigitalfix.com image 400x226]

Approves

/use take 2...


you're saying ken starr is a wee little puppet man?
 
2013-11-16 03:20:49 AM  

Smirky the Wonder Chimp: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time.

Only if it was by a democratic president, it would seem.


The thing about Clinton sodomizing youngsters in the oval office with cigars was that back then it would be seen as a security risk for blackmail by hostiles.
 
2013-11-16 03:31:48 AM  

fusillade762: whidbey: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell

Are you sure you aren't in it now?

You're soaking in it!


Depends!

Good for something
 
2013-11-16 03:34:23 AM  

img.gawkerassets.com


I'm going to say this again.  My friend did not have sexual relations with those minors.  And I don't care what the victims, the evidence, or the jury said.

 
2013-11-16 03:56:37 AM  

Noam Chimpsky: Smirky the Wonder Chimp: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time.

Only if it was by a democratic president, it would seem.

The thing about Clinton sodomizing youngsters in the oval office with cigars was that back then it would be seen as a security risk for blackmail by hostiles.


Sure. Like Hillary didn't know. It wasn't about national security. It was about trying to find something, anything, to hurt "that pinko hippie" Clinton with. They threw everything they could find at the wall, and the only thing that stuck was the blowjob.
 
2013-11-16 04:05:22 AM  

red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.


He's not the attorney. He's the assbag who has a sad that his buddy can't golf with him.
 
2013-11-16 04:13:13 AM  

Noam Chimpsky: Smirky the Wonder Chimp: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time.

Only if it was by a democratic president, it would seem.

The thing about Clinton sodomizing youngsters in the oval office with cigars was that back then it would be seen as a security risk for blackmail by hostiles.


I like how your dumb bad troll alt ran out of shtick to the point that you had to compare sexual harassment between adults to child rape.

Seriously. Either retire this theme or reexamine your shiatty thought process that made you think this was a plan.
 
2013-11-16 04:17:46 AM  

Mikey1969: gingerjet: I personally believe that Ken Starr has a large amount of actual honor

As evidenced by the fact that he wants an admitted child molester to walk the streets because "he took the time to chat" with their 14-year old daughter... Yeah, I bet he did.

Seriously, campaigning to get an admitted child molester out is about as far from "honor" as you can get, IMHO, unless you are the actual molester.

It's not even like we can say "Well, he served his sentence, and paid his debt to society.".


Apparently "a large amount of actual honor" is slang for rape apologist.
 
2013-11-16 04:44:00 AM  
When I saw "serial pedophile", I thought this was going to be about Ted Nugent. Isn't he supposed to be dead or in jail by now?
 
2013-11-16 04:44:05 AM  

Noam Chimpsky: Smirky the Wonder Chimp: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time.

Only if it was by a democratic president, it would seem.

The thing about Clinton sodomizing youngsters in the oval office with cigars was that back then it would be seen as a security risk for blackmail by hostiles.


Especially by hypocrites whose motivations were purely political, and wasted lots of my taxpayer dollars.
More money-wasting Republicans. Damn those guys cost me a lot of money!
 
2013-11-16 04:49:41 AM  

Rocket To Russia: When I saw "serial pedophile", I thought this was going to be about Ted Nugent. Isn't he supposed to be dead or in jail by now?


Really? No shiat?
 
2013-11-16 04:53:07 AM  

stoli n coke: Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?

Both sides are bad, so molest Republican? Is that what you're getting at?

Fine, Polanski belongs in jail, too. There. Now go pretend to be victimized somewhere else.


You mean the guy that we Lieberals of the People's Republic of California convicted of rape, and are still trying to extradite?
 
2013-11-16 04:55:27 AM  

Noam Chimpsky: Smirky the Wonder Chimp: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time.

Only if it was by a democratic president, it would seem.

The thing about Clinton sodomizing youngsters in the oval office with cigars was that back then it would be seen as a security risk for blackmail by hostiles.


Youngsters. Un hunh. Drew, please rein in you favored troll monkeys. They are making a mockery of your sideshow.
 
2013-11-16 05:06:10 AM  

Ed Grubermann: Noam Chimpsky: Smirky the Wonder Chimp: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time.

Only if it was by a democratic president, it would seem.

The thing about Clinton sodomizing youngsters in the oval office with cigars was that back then it would be seen as a security risk for blackmail by hostiles.

Sure. Like Hillary didn't know. It wasn't about national security. It was about trying to find something, anything, to hurt "that pinko hippie" Clinton with. They threw everything they could find at the wall, and the only thing that stuck was the blowjob.


That, and what stuck on the blue dress. Just sayin'
 
2013-11-16 05:10:02 AM  

jso2897: stoli n coke: Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?

Both sides are bad, so molest Republican? Is that what you're getting at?

Fine, Polanski belongs in jail, too. There. Now go pretend to be victimized somewhere else.

You mean the guy that we Lieberals of the People's Republic of California convicted of rape, and are still trying to extradite?


Yeah, him. The only reason Polanski got a pass was because the VICTIM wanted to let things slide, and people were willing to let it go for her sake.
 
2013-11-16 05:20:22 AM  

Noam Chimpsky: quatchi: Who the fark is his guy that he could get so many high profile players to vouch for him in a court of law?

I mean Sanduski had a D-List celebrity thing going on so I sort of got why some idiots stuck up for him but this guy? WTF?

You're thinking he was providing the young pussy for the elite? The thought crossed my mind.


Oh man... I can't even begin to imagine how nasty things would get if that were true. How high would such a thing go?
 
2013-11-16 05:43:08 AM  
While I am completely offended by Ken Starr's letter, the one that concerns me is the letter written by the Boy Scout adviser.  Bet dollars to donuts he's just sympathetic to a fellow traveler.
 
2013-11-16 06:02:02 AM  
he admits to having molested several girls, yet 'we don't know of any occasion he was abusive to women or children'


is the mental mobius strip they've contorted their brains into that since he molested girls, he wasn't abusing women or children....or that molesting them wasn't abusive?

or just that they weren't present for the molestation, so it doesn't count?
 
2013-11-16 06:06:06 AM  

Noam Chimpsky: stoli n coke: Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?

Both sides are bad, so molest Republican?

What? Are you Russian? I knew a Russian chick once that would say really funny shiat without realizing it.



Bullshiat. No chick would ever talk to you. At least, not without getting a credit card number first.
 
2013-11-16 06:31:46 AM  

you are a puppet: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness


He signed a letter his wife wrote asking that 70 y/o manbe given community service for crimes that ended 30 years ago.  Sorry if I can't generate poutrage over this.   The butthurt over the definition of 'is' seems to still smolder in certain Democratic circle jerks.
 
2013-11-16 06:34:20 AM  
Oh, he was nice to your daughter?  Are you sure of that?
 
2013-11-16 06:50:28 AM  

Alphax: Oh, he was nice to your daughter?  Are you sure of that?


Oh, he's sure of it, all right. I'll bet he was "nice" to his daughter too. These kind always cover for each other.
 
2013-11-16 06:54:58 AM  

Gyrfalcon: jso2897: stoli n coke: Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?

Both sides are bad, so molest Republican? Is that what you're getting at?

Fine, Polanski belongs in jail, too. There. Now go pretend to be victimized somewhere else.

You mean the guy that we Lieberals of the People's Republic of California convicted of rape, and are still trying to extradite?

Yeah, him. The only reason Polanski got a pass was because the VICTIM wanted to let things slide, and people were willing to let it go for her sake.


Uhh, no.   She wanted him to come back to the U.S. so it could be finished.  (maybe Ken Starr's wife should write a letter for Polanski to put the butthurt Starr haters in a tizzy.)

Polanski's victim:
"Straight up, what he did to me was wrong. But I wish he would return to America so the whole ordeal can be put to rest for both of us."

"I think he's sorry, I think he knows it was wrong. I don't think he's a danger to society. I don't think he needs to be locked up forever and no one has ever come out ever - besides me - and accused him of anything. It was 30 years ago now. "
 
2013-11-16 06:55:21 AM  

tbeatty: you are a puppet: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness

He signed a letter his wife wrote asking that 70 y/o manbe given community service for crimes that ended 30 years ago.  Sorry if I can't generate poutrage over this.   The butthurt over the definition of 'is' seems to still smolder in certain Democratic circle jerks.


Well, it was nice of you to take the time and effort to come in here and tell us how much you don't care.
We know who's really butthurt about this story.
 
2013-11-16 06:56:34 AM  

tbeatty: you are a puppet: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness

He signed a letter his wife wrote asking that 70 y/o manbe given community service for crimes that ended 30 years ago.  Sorry if I can't generate poutrage over this.   The butthurt over the definition of 'is' seems to still smolder in certain Democratic circle jerks.


So if you can avoid detection for 30 yrs you are somehow more deserving of community service than the guy who got caught diddling that 12 yr old last week?   It wasn't like he came forward and turned himself in, I consider the fact that for 30+ years (at least)* he took steps to conceal his activities and hide what he had done and I believe that actually makes the situation worse!

*And if you believe that he actually molested 10 young girls over a period of nearly 20 yrs and just suddenly gave up the practice - then he is way out of the norm according to all the research I have ever read about pedophiles.  Much more likely, statistically speaking, is that the prosecutors were simply unable to unearth more victims from post 1985, not that they don't exist or he had abandoned his little "hobby."
 
2013-11-16 06:56:43 AM  

tbeatty: Gyrfalcon: jso2897: stoli n coke: Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?

Both sides are bad, so molest Republican? Is that what you're getting at?

Fine, Polanski belongs in jail, too. There. Now go pretend to be victimized somewhere else.

You mean the guy that we Lieberals of the People's Republic of California convicted of rape, and are still trying to extradite?

Yeah, him. The only reason Polanski got a pass was because the VICTIM wanted to let things slide, and people were willing to let it go for her sake.

Uhh, no.   She wanted him to come back to the U.S. so it could be finished.  (maybe Ken Starr's wife should write a letter for Polanski to put the butthurt Starr haters in a tizzy.)

Polanski's victim:
"Straight up, what he did to me was wrong. But I wish he would return to America so the whole ordeal can be put to rest for both of us."

"I think he's sorry, I think he knows it was wrong. I don't think he's a danger to society. I don't think he needs to be locked up forever and no one has ever come out ever - besides me - and accused him of anything. It was 30 years ago now. "


Nice derail and threadshiat - 100% off-topic and retarded.
 
2013-11-16 07:00:13 AM  

jso2897: tbeatty: Gyrfalcon: jso2897: stoli n coke: Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?

Both sides are bad, so molest Republican? Is that what you're getting at?

Fine, Polanski belongs in jail, too. There. Now go pretend to be victimized somewhere else.

You mean the guy that we Lieberals of the People's Republic of California convicted of rape, and are still trying to extradite?

Yeah, him. The only reason Polanski got a pass was because the VICTIM wanted to let things slide, and people were willing to let it go for her sake.

Uhh, no.   She wanted him to come back to the U.S. so it could be finished.  (maybe Ken Starr's wife should write a letter for Polanski to put the butthurt Starr haters in a tizzy.)

Polanski's victim:
"Straight up, what he did to me was wrong. But I wish he would return to America so the whole ordeal can be put to rest for both of us."

"I think he's sorry, I think he knows it was wrong. I don't think he's a danger to society. I don't think he needs to be locked up forever and no one has ever come out ever - besides me - and accused him of anything. It was 30 years ago now. "

Nice derail and threadshiat - 100% off-topic and retarded.


0 / 10 - But I'll concede you are off-topic retarded.
 
2013-11-16 07:02:58 AM  

lawboy87: tbeatty: you are a puppet: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness

He signed a letter his wife wrote asking that 70 y/o manbe given community service for crimes that ended 30 years ago.  Sorry if I can't generate poutrage over this.   The butthurt over the definition of 'is' seems to still smolder in certain Democratic circle jerks.

So if you can avoid detection for 30 yrs you are somehow more deserving of community service than the guy who got caught diddling that 12 yr old last week?   It wasn't like he came forward and turned himself in, I consider the fact that for 30+ years (at least)* he took steps to conceal his activities and hide what he had done and I believe that actually makes the situation worse!



Why do you hate DREAMers?
 
2013-11-16 07:05:53 AM  
Republicans to appoint new Special Prosecutor:
i18.photobucket.com
 
2013-11-16 07:07:08 AM  

tbeatty: you are a puppet: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness

He signed a letter his wife wrote asking that 70 y/o manbe given community service for crimes that ended 30 years ago.  Sorry if I can't generate poutrage over this.   The butthurt over the definition of 'is' seems to still smolder in certain Democratic circle jerks.


Your belief that sex crimes committed 30 years ago deserve a pass is noted for the record. I shall call you Old Man Rapey.
 
2013-11-16 07:09:11 AM  

you are a puppet: tbeatty: you are a puppet: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness

He signed a letter his wife wrote asking that 70 y/o manbe given community service for crimes that ended 30 years ago.  Sorry if I can't generate poutrage over this.   The butthurt over the definition of 'is' seems to still smolder in certain Democratic circle jerks.

Your belief that sex crimes committed 30 years ago deserve a pass is noted for the record. I shall call you Old Man Rapey.


Careful - he'll give you a troll rating if you're not careful - we got ourselves a badass over there.
 
2013-11-16 07:12:01 AM  
Derp to English Translator: "Circle Jerk" translates to:
"Fewer than 21% of the population agree with me, and that is reflected in open forums that don't screen out opinions I don't like."
 
2013-11-16 07:23:40 AM  
Ken Starr has been morally bankrupt since the 90's.

Pedophiles victimize the most vulnerable, and this guy was in a position of trust.

but...

I have always assumed that belief in rehabilitation was a more liberal than conservative bias. And while not everyone thinks pedophilia can be cured, it does seem that it can be at least controlled. Is it such an awful thing that Starr thinks this guy deserves a bit of a break?

I cringe every time some Bible thumping conservative talks about how we are a Christian nation, and that godly men and women founded this country. Yet these same idiots want to lock up non-violent criminals for life, cut funding for prison education, and demand that felons lose their right to vote. So much for forgiveness and redemption.

So if Ken Starr shows a little heart, and suggests that a 74 year old man be released to community service instead of spending the rest of his life in prison, maybe he shouldn't be pilloried for practicing a Christian ethic for once.
 
2013-11-16 07:37:41 AM  

you are a puppet: tbeatty: you are a puppet: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness

He signed a letter his wife wrote asking that 70 y/o manbe given community service for crimes that ended 30 years ago.  Sorry if I can't generate poutrage over this.   The butthurt over the definition of 'is' seems to still smolder in certain Democratic circle jerks.

Your belief that sex crimes committed 30 years ago deserve a pass is noted for the record. I shall call you Old Man Rapey.


Meh, they could execute this guy and Polanski or let them go and I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.  LAck of victims over an extended period of time tends to point away from being a pedophile for both of them.  Still if punishment is required, might as well execute them.  'Fry Mumia' and all.  He didn't kill anybody for a long time and he still deserved to die.   It's the mouth-breathers that form their opinion based on who wrote support letters that deserve ridicule.  Their attention span is limited to "Ken Starr" && "support letter" -> "foam at mouth, pitchforks and torches".  It's the blatant hypocrisy to see the same idiots calling for prison because Ken Starr's wife wrote a letter vs. "free Mumia and Polansky because herp-a-derp"
 
2013-11-16 07:40:33 AM  
When Starr's limelight was brightest, I was in the elevator at one of the fanciest Hyde Park hotels in London, hoping Ken Starr antics didn't continue to crater the value of the dollar.

A fellow guest from the local area asked "What's the Ken Starr thing all about?"

I replied "He's a tobacco lawyer."

Watching his instant look of recognition was priceless.
 
2013-11-16 07:51:23 AM  

Maturin: Ken Starr has been morally bankrupt since the 90's.

Pedophiles victimize the most vulnerable, and this guy was in a position of trust.

but...

I have always assumed that belief in rehabilitation was a more liberal than conservative bias. And while not everyone thinks pedophilia can be cured, it does seem that it can be at least controlled. Is it such an awful thing that Starr thinks this guy deserves a bit of a break?

I cringe every time some Bible thumping conservative talks about how we are a Christian nation, and that godly men and women founded this country. Yet these same idiots want to lock up non-violent criminals for life, cut funding for prison education, and demand that felons lose their right to vote. So much for forgiveness and redemption.

So if Ken Starr shows a little heart, and suggests that a 74 year old man be released to community service instead of spending the rest of his life in prison, maybe he shouldn't be pilloried for practicing a Christian ethic for once.


Rehabilitation is one function of criminal sentencing. There are also punishment, deterrence, protection...I don't think we should let a guy completely off the hook for molesting numerous kids over the years just because he finally stopped after going impotent from old age.
 
2013-11-16 07:51:29 AM  

Maturin: Ken Starr has been morally bankrupt since the 90's.

Pedophiles victimize the most vulnerable, and this guy was in a position of trust.

but...

I have always assumed that belief in rehabilitation was a more liberal than conservative bias. And while not everyone thinks pedophilia can be cured, it does seem that it can be at least controlled. Is it such an awful thing that Starr thinks this guy deserves a bit of a break?

I cringe every time some Bible thumping conservative talks about how we are a Christian nation, and that godly men and women founded this country. Yet these same idiots want to lock up non-violent criminals for life, cut funding for prison education, and demand that felons lose their right to vote. So much for forgiveness and redemption.

So if Ken Starr shows a little heart, and suggests that a 74 year old man be released to community service instead of spending the rest of his life in prison, maybe he shouldn't be pilloried for practicing a Christian ethic for once.


Most folks' belief of redemption ends around kiddie-diddlers, it's the whole reason we have a sex offender registry that continues to punish people after they get out of jail.  Folks like Starr are a part of that group, but sometimes they get a blind spot when the person claims to love the right version of jesus hard enough. See Mike Huckabee's pardoning of Wayne Dumond.

For my own part I try to stick with the science.  Serial killers don't get better at being people, they just get better at hiding and faking humanity.  I'm hazier on pedos, but I'm pretty sure they don't get better either.
 
2013-11-16 08:03:17 AM  

Aquapope: But getting a blowjob in the Oval Office is so heinous an act it merits all the money and self-righteous zeal you can throw at it, eh Ken?


You're forgetting that the next talking point is BUT HE LIED UNDER OATH.

Iran/Contra:  Just defending freedom, nobody to blame
Lewsinky: MONSTER
Iraq war: Just defending freedom, nobody to blame
Health insurance reform: MONSTER
 
2013-11-16 08:06:49 AM  
lawboy87:

*And if you believe that he actually molested 10 young girls over a period of nearly 20 yrs and just suddenly gave up the practice - then he is way out of the norm according to all the research I have ever read about pedophiles.  Much more likely, statistically speaking, is that the prosecutors were simply unable to unearth more victims from post 1985, not that they don't exist or he had abandoned his little "hobby."

I didn't read 10 girls, but 10 incidents with 4 victims  and a narrow range of age between 12 and 14.  You should be able to use your razor intellect to deduce that the age range, stopping and lack of victims coupled with your extensive research, would lead away from assessing him as a pedophile.  Same with Polansky.  If you knew anything at all, you should at least be able to distinguish pedophilia (interest in pre-pubescent children) from other paraphilia's that don't fall in that category.  Doesn't mean he isn't a rapist or sex offender, but slapping a label like 'pedophile' without understanding what it means and then implying he must behave as pedophiles behave is simply stupid.  Please go let Wikipedia form an opinion for you so you can at least understand the terms.  Then let Occam's Razor apply what you learned.
 
2013-11-16 08:17:18 AM  

Shedim: Noam Chimpsky: quatchi: Who the fark is his guy that he could get so many high profile players to vouch for him in a court of law?

I mean Sanduski had a D-List celebrity thing going on so I sort of got why some idiots stuck up for him but this guy? WTF?

You're thinking he was providing the young pussy for the elite? The thought crossed my mind.

Oh man... I can't even begin to imagine how nasty things would get if that were true. How high would such a thing go?


All the way to the top?
 
2013-11-16 08:18:33 AM  
Oh boy you Farklibs are digging real deep to try to offset the Obamacare fiasco.
 
2013-11-16 08:24:02 AM  

Kibbler: Aquapope: But getting a blowjob in the Oval Office is so heinous an act it merits all the money and self-righteous zeal you can throw at it, eh Ken?

You're forgetting that the next talking point is BUT HE LIED UNDER OATH.

Iran/Contra:  Just defending freedom, nobody to blame
Lewsinky: MONSTER
Iraq war: Just defending freedom, nobody to blame
Health insurance reform: MONSTER


The ButtHurt is strong in this one.
 
2013-11-16 08:24:09 AM  

Curious: look all the molestees were poors and what does it really matter now. and heck he felt bad about it for years afterward, that counts right? well according to that one woman it does.

me i'd throw him in gen pop with a big kiddie diddler sign around his neck. let him see what it's like to live in fear for a few years.


Absolutely. There is no reason we protect people like this once they are in jail.
 
2013-11-16 08:24:19 AM  
FTA:   Sullivan said Kloman held her so tightly his arms were like "lobster claws."

What the fark are Robster Craws?
 
2013-11-16 08:31:19 AM  
I'm love to have the money to fund a series of tv, radio, and newspaper adds in the Washington area giving the names and pictures of all those people supporting this idiocy.
 
2013-11-16 08:36:10 AM  

violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.


Except when it's one of their own, as seen in TFA.
 
2013-11-16 08:46:00 AM  

Stile4aly: I attended Potomac for High School with Kloman's son and Ken Starr's son.  In fact, I lived about a half mile from Starr.  I think it's a terrible shame that all this support is being expressed for someone who confessed to these crimes and it reflects very poorly on a school that I really loved.


Mclean was pretty farked up wasn't it.
 
2013-11-16 08:53:43 AM  

tbeatty: lawboy87:

*And if you believe that he actually molested 10 young girls over a period of nearly 20 yrs and just suddenly gave up the practice - then he is way out of the norm according to all the research I have ever read about pedophiles.  Much more likely, statistically speaking, is that the prosecutors were simply unable to unearth more victims from post 1985, not that they don't exist or he had abandoned his little "hobby."

I didn't read 10 girls, but 10 incidents with 4 victims  and a narrow range of age between 12 and 14.  You should be able to use your razor intellect to deduce that the age range, stopping and lack of victims coupled with your extensive research, would lead away from assessing him as a pedophile.  Same with Polansky.  If you knew anything at all, you should at least be able to distinguish pedophilia (interest in pre-pubescent children) from other paraphilia's that don't fall in that category.  Doesn't mean he isn't a rapist or sex offender, but slapping a label like 'pedophile' without understanding what it means and then implying he must behave as pedophiles behave is simply stupid.  Please go let Wikipedia form an opinion for you so you can at least understand the terms.  Then let Occam's Razor apply what you learned.


You're typing an awful lot of words to defend an admitted child rapist.

Is there something you'd like to share with the class?
 
Displayed 50 of 153 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report