If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Gawker)   So what is moral authority Ken Starr up to these days? Oh, just lobbying to get a serial pedophile released   (gawker.com) divider line 153
    More: Sick, Ken Starr, Washingtonians  
•       •       •

3947 clicks; posted to Politics » on 16 Nov 2013 at 12:50 AM (40 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



153 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-11-16 12:58:32 AM
Republicans.

That's the joke horror.
 
2013-11-16 01:00:09 AM
I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.
 
2013-11-16 01:00:19 AM
Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.
 
2013-11-16 01:00:44 AM
In Ken Starr's defense, he is a two-faced piece of shiat.
 
2013-11-16 01:01:42 AM

red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.


He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness
 
2013-11-16 01:09:34 AM

red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.


Ken Starr was not the pedophile's attorney. He was a family friend who wrote the judge asking for leniency for a repeat child molester. He voluntarily told a judge that he thought a man who molested several girls under 14 had learned his lesson and was totally trustworthy.
 
2013-11-16 01:10:04 AM
I attended Potomac for High School with Kloman's son and Ken Starr's son.  In fact, I lived about a half mile from Starr.  I think it's a terrible shame that all this support is being expressed for someone who confessed to these crimes and it reflects very poorly on a school that I really loved.
 
2013-11-16 01:10:21 AM
look all the molestees were poors and what does it really matter now. and heck he felt bad about it for years afterward, that counts right? well according to that one woman it does.

me i'd throw him in gen pop with a big kiddie diddler sign around his neck. let him see what it's like to live in fear for a few years.
 
2013-11-16 01:11:56 AM

Curious: look all the molestees were poors and what does it really matter now. and heck he felt bad about it for years afterward, that counts right? well according to that one woman it does.

me i'd throw him in gen pop with a big kiddie diddler sign around his neck. let him see what it's like to live in fear for a few years.


More like live in pain for a few hours, if that happened.  And yet I can't say it's not justice.
 
2013-11-16 01:16:00 AM

red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.


I know this is crazy and all... but you should probably RTFA.
 
2013-11-16 01:19:51 AM

red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.


Fracking.  Retard.
 
2013-11-16 01:26:51 AM
How is this "political news?" How is Ken Starr even relevant any more?
 
2013-11-16 01:31:38 AM
Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell
 
2013-11-16 01:33:02 AM

readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell


Are you sure you aren't in it now?
 
2013-11-16 01:34:17 AM

whidbey: How is this "political news?" How is Ken Starr even relevant any more?


Does defending a pedophile defender make you a pedophile defender defender? Why yes.

/Ken Starr is and always will be "political" to anyone paying attention in the '90s.
 
2013-11-16 01:35:35 AM
Looking at those letters was farking disgusting. The lynchpin to most of them was the "well, this happened years ago" defense, as if this guy deserved to not go to jail just because he wasn't caught right away.

Fark yous all around to all the people who wrote letters defending that asshole.
 
2013-11-16 01:35:52 AM

whidbey: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell

Are you sure you aren't in it now?


You may have a point, considering the company. :(
 
2013-11-16 01:36:59 AM

readbot42: whidbey: How is this "political news?" How is Ken Starr even relevant any more?

Does defending a pedophile defender make you a pedophile defender defender? Why yes.

/Ken Starr is and always will be "political" to anyone paying attention in the '90s.


I was there, thanks, paying attention, and I still say he has no social or political relevance now. He should have lost every penny he made out of wasting the taxpayer dollars prosecuting Clinton.
 
2013-11-16 01:38:25 AM

whidbey: readbot42: whidbey: How is this "political news?" How is Ken Starr even relevant any more?

Does defending a pedophile defender make you a pedophile defender defender? Why yes.

/Ken Starr is and always will be "political" to anyone paying attention in the '90s.

I was there, thanks, paying attention, and I still say he has no social or political relevance now. He should have lost every penny he made out of wasting the taxpayer dollars prosecuting Clinton.


Agreed.
 
2013-11-16 01:39:08 AM

whidbey: readbot42: whidbey: How is this "political news?" How is Ken Starr even relevant any more?

Does defending a pedophile defender make you a pedophile defender defender? Why yes.

/Ken Starr is and always will be "political" to anyone paying attention in the '90s.

I was there, thanks, paying attention, and I still say he has no social or political relevance now. He should have lost every penny he made out of wasting the taxpayer dollars prosecuting Clinton.


I think I recall that some law schools were paying him to come out and give speeches, about 10 years back.
 
2013-11-16 01:43:20 AM
So, okay, he's been a model citizen since 1985 and supposedly repented of his ways. They say he hasn't harmed any kids since those long-ago days when he was molesting 14-year old girls. Now, I could almost accept that.....EXCEPT....

Was it Kenny Starr's dear friend himself who reported his crimes and made amends to his victims? Did he confess to his deeds and publicly own up to what he did, and voluntarily offer to do the community service his loyal supporters felt would be a better sentence than prison? Did he apologize to the girls whose lives he damaged? Did he remove himself from the presence of young girls so he could get a handle on his obvious emotional issues?

Or did he pretend it never happened, go on with his life, and, 20 years later, get caught back in close proximity to underage girls again? The youngest, who was 12 at the time Kloman molested her, sparked an investigation in 2011 when as an adult she discovered Kloman was substitute-teaching at her daughter's Maryland grade school.

I kind of think he never stopped fondling prepubescent Lolitas, Mr. Starr, and I really doubt he has been "conducting himself in an acceptable manner." He just didn't get caught again. But you keep on thinking that only bad Democrat presidents and their chubby interns do the nasty if that makes you happy.
 
2013-11-16 01:44:30 AM

whidbey: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell

Are you sure you aren't in it now?


You're soaking in it!
 
2013-11-16 01:44:41 AM

red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.


In no part of the article do I see that Starr is his attorney. He is just writing this letter as a supporter.

Of a child molester.
 
2013-11-16 01:45:05 AM
That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?
 
2013-11-16 01:45:14 AM

whidbey: How is this "political news?" How is Ken Starr even relevant any more?


You are going to be soooo pissed when they're still talking about Palin 20 years from now.
 
2013-11-16 01:46:08 AM
But getting a blowjob in the Oval Office is so heinous an act it merits all the money and self-righteous zeal you can throw at it, eh Ken?
 
2013-11-16 01:47:32 AM

Farker Soze: whidbey: How is this "political news?" How is Ken Starr even relevant any more?

You are going to be soooo pissed when they're still talking about Palin 20 years from now.


Well, they'll be looking back on a surprisingly strong and robust Presidency. That's different.
 
2013-11-16 01:49:11 AM

you are a puppet: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

He's not the guy's attorney, he's a character witness


stoli n coke: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

Ken Starr was not the pedophile's attorney. He was a family friend who wrote the judge asking for leniency for a repeat child molester. He voluntarily told a judge that he thought a man who molested several girls under 14 had learned his lesson and was totally trustworthy.


mongbiohazard: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

I know this is crazy and all... but you should probably RTFA.


Testiclaw: red5ish: Being an attorney means you represent your client, so I have no problem with Starr doing this. It is ugly but it is the way the system works.

Fracking.  Retard.


GODAMNITSOMUCH.
Sorry, I failed.

imageshack.us
 
2013-11-16 01:49:15 AM

Farker Soze: whidbey: How is this "political news?" How is Ken Starr even relevant any more?

You are going to be soooo pissed when they're still talking about Palin 20 years from now.


Past tense, perhaps.

One of these days, she'll forget to breathe, and we'll never have to hear her voice again.
 
2013-11-16 01:51:34 AM

rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.


Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.
 
2013-11-16 01:52:13 AM

Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?


Both sides are bad, so molest Republican? Is that what you're getting at?

Fine, Polanski belongs in jail, too. There. Now go pretend to be victimized somewhere else.
 
2013-11-16 01:53:17 AM

stoli n coke: Ken Starr was not the pedophile's attorney. He was a family friend who wrote the judge asking for leniency for a repeat child molester. He voluntarily told a judge that he thought a man who molested several girls under 14 had learned his lesson and was totally trustworthy.


I personally believe that Ken Starr has a large amount of actual honor (unlike most lawyers ... or Republicans).  My favorite bit bout Ken Starr is the fact that after he finished up his report on the Clinton investigation is that he sent his report to Congress via a truck and didn't notify them in advance.  Just threw it on their doorstep and walked away.  The House Republicans were furious.
 
2013-11-16 01:54:43 AM

stoli n coke: Looking at those letters was farking disgusting. The lynchpin to most of them was the "well, this happened years ago" defense, as if this guy deserved to not go to jail just because he wasn't caught right away.

Fark yous all around to all the people who wrote letters defending that asshole.


right on. for all these years those girls had to live with this. and whatever side effects it caused them. and you know there were some. time for him to spend 20 years thinking about what happened and what it means.

let a couple of pot possession guys out to make room for him.
 
2013-11-16 01:55:22 AM

violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.


Sure. Unless it is one of their own. Not so much an indictment of either ideology, but of Washington insiders feeling the need to defend their own. Starr isn't the only one defending this pedophile.
 
2013-11-16 01:55:29 AM

violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.


But then, It's OK If You Are A Republican.  IOKIYAAR.  Any rule, any law.
 
2013-11-16 01:56:49 AM
Eh, perhaps one to many A's in my acronym.
 
2013-11-16 02:01:52 AM

Curious: stoli n coke: Looking at those letters was farking disgusting. The lynchpin to most of them was the "well, this happened years ago" defense, as if this guy deserved to not go to jail just because he wasn't caught right away.

Fark yous all around to all the people who wrote letters defending that asshole.

right on. for all these years those girls had to live with this. and whatever side effects it caused them. and you know there were some. time for him to spend 20 years thinking about what happened and what it means.

let a couple of pot possession guys out to make room for him.


^^this^^
 
2013-11-16 02:04:44 AM
Who the fark is his guy that he could get so many high profile players to vouch for him in a court of law?

I mean Sanduski had a D-List celebrity thing going on so I sort of got why some idiots stuck up for him but this guy? WTF?
 
2013-11-16 02:07:26 AM
And to think that they want to get him released because he's a Chatty Kathy...

He really chatted up those 14 year old girls in order to get a little bit of extra curricular hanky panky, that's for sure.

What a scumbag. "Which one?", you say? Yeah, that one.
 
2013-11-16 02:11:25 AM

quatchi: Who the fark is his guy that he could get so many high profile players to vouch for him in a court of law?

I mean Sanduski had a D-List celebrity thing going on so I sort of got why some idiots stuck up for him but this guy? WTF?


He was our peeps, I guess. I mean, those coaches, they'll do anything, but Our People don't actually molest little girls. Anyway, Sandusky was a closet homo, with all them little boys, so who cares, right?
 
2013-11-16 02:17:06 AM

readbot42: Sure. Unless it is one of their own.


Alphax: violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.

But then, It's OK If You Are A Republican.  IOKIYAAR.  Any rule, any law.


Or maybe people just get blindly compassionate for people who they know for reasons other than their crimes and there is no partisan argument.
 
2013-11-16 02:18:51 AM

gingerjet: I personally believe that Ken Starr has a large amount of actual honor


As evidenced by the fact that he wants an admitted child molester to walk the streets because "he took the time to chat" with their 14-year old daughter... Yeah, I bet he did.

Seriously, campaigning to get an admitted child molester out is about as far from "honor" as you can get, IMHO, unless you are the actual molester.

It's not even like we can say "Well, he served his sentence, and paid his debt to society.".
 
2013-11-16 02:19:23 AM

stoli n coke: Noam Chimpsky: That's just disgusting...but why are the Polanskicrats outraged?

Both sides are bad, so molest Republican?


What? Are you Russian? I knew a Russian chick once that would say really funny shiat without realizing it.
 
2013-11-16 02:23:07 AM

quatchi: Who the fark is his guy that he could get so many high profile players to vouch for him in a court of law?

I mean Sanduski had a D-List celebrity thing going on so I sort of got why some idiots stuck up for him but this guy? WTF?


You're thinking he was providing the young pussy for the elite? The thought crossed my mind.
 
2013-11-16 02:24:16 AM

violentsalvation: readbot42: Sure. Unless it is one of their own.

Alphax: violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.

But then, It's OK If You Are A Republican.  IOKIYAAR.  Any rule, any law.

Or maybe people just get blindly compassionate for people who they know for reasons other than their crimes and there is no partisan argument.


Or both.  He's 'one of us'.
 
2013-11-16 02:45:38 AM

violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.


I thought it was doggie style?
 
2013-11-16 02:50:45 AM

fusillade762: violentsalvation: rosebud_the_sled: I can understand Ken Starr's position.  All Conservatives are child molesters, most of them have not confessed yet.

Oh please. "Let's execute the child molesting f*cker and be done with it" is the general conservative position.

I thought it was doggie style?


Well, some do like to bury a bone here and there.
 
2013-11-16 02:59:36 AM

whidbey: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell

Are you sure you aren't in it now?


Approve
 
2013-11-16 03:08:41 AM

Empty Matchbook: whidbey: readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time. Assaulting children? Not so much. Just. Wow.

/wish there were a hell

Are you sure you aren't in it now?

Approve


Someday I'll learn the proper use of PREVIEW...or Fark will have it not post if an image is being thrown out. So! TAKE 2!!

film.thedigitalfix.com

Approves

/use take 2...
 
2013-11-16 03:12:14 AM

readbot42: Ken Starr was offended by consensual adult sexy time.


Only if it was by a democratic president, it would seem.
 
Displayed 50 of 153 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report