enry: Wat.A fungus kills plants and that's proof that evolution isn't real?
Slaxl: Why did God curse plants to have thorns because of Adam's sin? Also wasn't it Eve's sin?
Peter von Nostrand: [www.seriouseats.com image 500x123]
Relatively Obscure: Also, I have no idea WTF argument this guy is even trying to present.
simplicimus: enry: Wat.A fungus kills plants and that's proof that evolution isn't real?People can die from fungal infections. So that means....?
omnibus_necanda_sunt: "Mutations are thought to be the main mechanism by which evolution occurs but every mutation we see is harmful, not helpful as evolution requires," Morris argued.Drug resistant bacteria.Checkmate, dumbass
Diogenes: omnibus_necanda_sunt: "Mutations are thought to be the main mechanism by which evolution occurs but every mutation we see is harmful, not helpful as evolution requires," Morris argued.Drug resistant bacteria.Checkmate, dumbassSickle trait.It may not be entirely helpful, but it beats dying from malaria.
Ambivalence: Spoken like someone who has absolutely no idea what evolution is. Or biology for that matter. Or even bible studies. WTF? thorns on plants because of original sin? I don't even...
vernonFL: Why do men have nipples?
impaler: Creationists' view of the universeIf your browser makes the image fit, make sure you zoom in before scrolling through.
Pocket Ninja: The problem here is that he's using a "word of God" argument to disprove evolution, and while that's more than enough for most people, it's never enough for the evolutionistas. They lack faith, which is their entire problem. Atheism is basically what happens when you replace traditional faith with an irrational faith in science, which for all intensive purposes is its own religion with its own priesthood (ala the Double Ds, Darwin and Dawkins). So a rational faith-based argument will never convince them, despite its obvious merits. The argument must be based in the teat of science at which the evolutionistas suckle.And so, consider the hard nipple of science: proof. To prove the fundamental illogicacy of the evolutionista's worldview, one must first expose the hypocrisy upon which they have anchored the foundation of the pinnacle of their system. To the evolutionista, you see, the following statement is both true and correct:Evolution is occurring because animals have changed over time as an adaptation to their needs.It seems simple enough. Satisfying, even. But let us deconstruct this. Over time is the crucial element here, the lynchpin upon which the evolutionista's argument depends. Ask the evolutionista why no one can observe actual changes taking place in animals right now, at this moment, and it is to this safe shelter that they will retreat time and time again: It occurs over millenia, they will say. The changes are subtle and slow.And then you must ask them: But how, then, do you know yourself that these changes are taking place?Because science tells me, they will say.And then, you: But how do you know that science is correct?The scientists tell me so, they will say.And here you must nod, and perhaps lay a hand of comfort upon their shoulder, because you are about to shatter their narrow universe. It is the same, my friend, you will say, as with the Lord and I.You see, in the end, there is not actual evidence of evolution. No one has see ...
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Mar 29 2017 23:26:04
Runtime: 0.396 sec (396 ms)