Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New Yorker)   You can love science AND question it. As a matter of fact, you SHOULD love science and question it   (newyorker.com ) divider line
    More: Obvious, science journalist, Neanderthal DNA, string theory, molecular biology, John Horgan  
•       •       •

1644 clicks; posted to Geek » on 09 Nov 2013 at 4:37 PM (2 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-11-09 03:51:15 PM  
5 votes:
That's a good idea.  We should come up with some kind of method that formalizes that.
2013-11-09 05:37:12 PM  
2 votes:
i.imgur.com
2013-11-09 04:04:55 PM  
2 votes:
As opposed to gods, who take it all personal when you do that.
2013-11-09 04:34:05 PM  
1 vote:
Yes, the brainstrust in the Yahoo News comments loudly lambasting scienticians, calling for creationism in schools and mandatory burning of fossil fuels (to show them damn dirty hippies), and refusing to let their snowflake's precious bodily fluids be contaminated with autism juice, all because they heard a fourth hand account of a scientists work reported by a "journalist" with dubious credentials is the same as peer review and scientific consensus.
 
Displayed 4 of 4 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report