If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Globe and Mail)   Canadian Prime Minister: Senator Duffy is lying. Senator Duffy: Here's a photocopy of the cheque   (theglobeandmail.com) divider line 56
    More: Followup, PMO, Senate, checkbooks, National Catholic Reporter, Prince Edward Island, Patrick Brazeau  
•       •       •

5169 clicks; posted to Politics » on 28 Oct 2013 at 7:42 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



56 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-10-28 07:09:34 PM  
Does this look like the face of a liar?

img.photobucket.com
 
2013-10-28 07:10:32 PM  
Clearly a hail Mary pass by Duffy but the cheque stub implies a lot.

There are the short term considerations and the long term ones. In the short term, Wallin and Duffy have no reason to be discrete any more to protect their party. They've been cut loose, the question is, will they have a platform on which to make a case. This will be their near-term fight. Harper's near term fight is to ignore everyone and focus on the forthcoming party convention.

In the long term, this may may force a heap of sudden resignations inside his party apparatus. The result can be that dossiers get dropped which can, in time, cause secondary explosions. In the mean time, he could end up with a lot of people outside the tent pissing in.
 
2013-10-28 07:33:24 PM  
img.fark.net
Stop it Senator Duffy or the kitten dies.
 
2013-10-28 07:35:24 PM  

BATMANATEE: Does this look like the face of a liar?

[img.photobucket.com image 400x503]


can we get rid of this fark tard now? how did this obvious douche sandwich get elected? oh, yeah, he stole the election...
 
2013-10-28 07:44:24 PM  
Lol Canada
 
2013-10-28 07:52:05 PM  
I don't think this is a "hail Mary pass" by Duffy. He's running a wishbone option. In simplest terms he's letting Harper's cronies know "Hey, I'm willing to cough up this stuff and throw it out there, even if it makes me look just as bad. You and I know this isn't the only incriminating document I have. So what will it be? Are you going to commit and come after me? Or are you going to hit someone else and let me head to the end zone?"
 
2013-10-28 07:56:10 PM  

some_beer_drinker: BATMANATEE: Does this look like the face of a liar?

[img.photobucket.com image 400x503]

can we get rid of this fark tard now? how did this obvious douche sandwich get elected? oh, yeah, he stole the election...


How did he stealthe election?  I mean yes, there were the robocall shennaigans, but they didn't affect enough ridings to tilt the balance, AFAIK.

I mean, it's _appalling_ that he won.  Somehow Canadians decided to give a reactionary, corrupt government, a government that just weeks before had been caught literally writing the word 'NOT' on duly passed legislation before signing it to deny funding, and turned it from a minority into a majority government.  This happened, and I still don't really know how.  I'm guessing it was 'the evil you know' vs. 'I make Mitt Romney look principled Ignatiuk' and 'We Love the Moustache, but hate the Party'.

And what scares the crap out of me?  Next election might actually be _worse_.  Look at the opposition...if you dare.  Tom 'I just can't stop talking, even when I should' Mulcair, and Justin 'Trudeau!' Trudeau.  And I won't even have a meaningful vote this time...at least last time my riding was in play.  Now that I'm in the farm belt again, not so much.
 
2013-10-28 08:00:30 PM  
BTW, here's an explanation of the wishbone option, for those of you who don't know football:http://www.coachad.com/pages/Spre/Team-Sports-Strategies---F ootball---3-Complementary-Plays-To-The-Wishbone-Triple-Option.phpThe idea is the quarterback can run, pitch it, or pass, depending on the defense's movement. It's a great pay that, when run well by a visually aware QB, makes the defense take the first move and can result in a lot of yards. But if the defense expects it, or if you run it too much, it drastically reduces the health of the QB, since he most always will take a hit.Apt metaphor, I believe.
 
2013-10-28 08:04:42 PM  

gaslight: Wallin and Duffy have no reason to be discrete any more to protect their party.


How does them being separate and distinct protect the party? Were they in danger of merging into some super-politician or something?
 
2013-10-28 08:05:21 PM  

BATMANATEE: Does this look like the face of a liar?

[img.photobucket.com image 400x503]


Is that a real photo? I'd be willing to believe, given the current state of politics, that it is.
 
2013-10-28 08:11:59 PM  

SN1987a goes boom: BATMANATEE: Does this look like the face of a liar?

[img.photobucket.com image 400x503]

Is that a real photo? I'd be willing to believe, given the current state of politics, that it is.


It's been around a while.  AFAIK, it's the real, glorious deal.
 
2013-10-28 08:13:53 PM  
Hi, I'm a dumb yank. Can anyone here offer a little background into what's happening in Ottawa? The only thing I can get from TFA is that Harper may have misspent some funds on... something or other.
 
2013-10-28 08:15:06 PM  
This just keeps getting better and better. I love how it went from "It is with great regret that I accept Wright's resignation" to "I fired his ass".
 
2013-10-28 08:15:37 PM  
Sick burn, eh?
 
2013-10-28 08:29:54 PM  

Fabric_Man: Hi, I'm a dumb yank. Can anyone here offer a little background into what's happening in Ottawa? The only thing I can get from TFA is that Harper may have misspent some funds on... something or other.


It's sort of complicated, but this is about our senate which is different from yours because we they're appointed, not elected, and they don't actually do anything. Except now they figured out how to game the system so a few of them who were appointed by our PM McSweaterVest KittenPants have been lining their pockets by claiming expenses that weren't really claimable and the chief of staff for our PM McSV KP even covered the bill to the tune of 90k for one but then got caught out and fired/resigned.

So the senators have been getting thrown under a bus by the administration and now the fat(test) one, Duffy, has just pulled the pin on a grenade in a crowded room and...well, stay tuned to see what happens.
 
2013-10-28 08:32:05 PM  
Its great seeing conservatives on both sides of the border eating their own. Keep up the good work, guys!
 
2013-10-28 08:33:28 PM  

Fabric_Man: Hi, I'm a dumb yank. Can anyone here offer a little background into what's happening in Ottawa? The only thing I can get from TFA is that Harper may have misspent some funds on... something or other.


Imagine the president (or his chief of staff) paid cash to a sitting senator in order to have that senator stop fighting an inquiry into improperly claimed housing expenses.   In addition to the cash, the president promises that the committee looking into his housing expenses will whitewash the results.

Up until this point the senator has also been a huge fundraiser for the president and his party.

Now imagine the committee screws up the whitewash and the president starts smack talking the Senator and trying to get his pay stopped and him kicked out of the Senate.
 
2013-10-28 08:41:27 PM  

Fabric_Man: Hi, I'm a dumb yank. Can anyone here offer a little background into what's happening in Ottawa? The only thing I can get from TFA is that Harper may have misspent some funds on... something or other.


Duffy was basically using government funds as a personal checking account, buying whatever luxuries and shiat he wanted for himself, using a loophole in how residency is declared to get is all classed as "living expenses".  A loophole that, it turns out, wasn't actually a loophole and was just straight-up illegal.  Additionally, he's claimed a bunch of "travel expenses" that weren't actually part of his job and so on.

The rest of it is pretty much the standard parade of excuses and accusations that follow any exposure of blatant corruption.
 
2013-10-28 08:46:30 PM  

Jim_Callahan: Fabric_Man: Hi, I'm a dumb yank. Can anyone here offer a little background into what's happening in Ottawa? The only thing I can get from TFA is that Harper may have misspent some funds on... something or other.

Duffy was basically using government funds as a personal checking account, buying whatever luxuries and shiat he wanted for himself, using a loophole in how residency is declared to get is all classed as "living expenses".  A loophole that, it turns out, wasn't actually a loophole and was just straight-up illegal.  Additionally, he's claimed a bunch of "travel expenses" that weren't actually part of his job and so on.

The rest of it is pretty much the standard parade of excuses and accusations that follow any exposure of blatant corruption.


We call that 'Tuesday'.
 
2013-10-28 08:48:12 PM  
southparkstudios.mtvnimages.com

"It's not my cheque, buddy"
 
2013-10-28 08:48:20 PM  
King Harper(R-servant) of Canada seems like such a nice fellow.... So when is his next press conference where he won't allow reporters to ask questions in regards to his Kings speech?

/King Harper: "bring in them fancy soul stealing, camera thingees, and heres the script for you to repeat word for word on the monopoly news that my 3 buddies own"
//His buddy at Bell Canada is going to scrape every bit of content from peoples Internet(cell or landline) and sell it to the highest bidder with no opt in/out and Canada's NSA screams about competition to their own scraping for Cheneys use

Canada's NSA is worse than 'Merica's NSA.
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/tags/nsa
 
2013-10-28 08:58:42 PM  

Doktor_Zhivago: Lol Canada


I know, man - do you realize that this shiat they are talking about is illegal there?
Weird.
 
2013-10-28 09:00:22 PM  

VGA Hole: BTW, here's an explanation of the wishbone option, for those of you who don't know football:http://www.coachad.com/pages/Spre/Team-Sports-Strategies---F ootball---3-Complementary-Plays-To-The-Wishbone-Triple-Option.phpThe idea is the quarterback can run, pitch it, or pass, depending on the defense's movement. It's a great pay that, when run well by a visually aware QB, makes the defense take the first move and can result in a lot of yards. But if the defense expects it, or if you run it too much, it drastically reduces the health of the QB, since he most always will take a hit.Apt metaphor, I believe.


Damn, I remember when the wishbone was a standard-bearer offense for most of the Top 10 teams in CFB.
 
2013-10-28 09:02:40 PM  
Yes, we have a massive massive coont running out country right now.  All because of the same stupid shiatty voting system (FPTP) that you use. It essentially negates democracy.
 
2013-10-28 09:12:10 PM  

VGA Hole: BTW, here's an explanation of the wishbone option, for those of you who don't know football:http://www.coachad.com/pages/Spre/Team-Sports-Strategies---F ootball---3-Complementary-Plays-To-The-Wishbone-Triple-Option.phpThe idea is the quarterback can run, pitch it, or pass, depending on the defense's movement. It's a great pay that, when run well by a visually aware QB, makes the defense take the first move and can result in a lot of yards. But if the defense expects it, or if you run it too much, it drastically reduces the health of the QB, since he most always will take a hit.Apt metaphor, I believe.


Thanks, I was thinking "Salad Dressing option?"  Really.
 
2013-10-28 09:15:26 PM  
fta "Let due process proceed," he said. "This is a case for the history books."

Yes, please. This could be fun.
 
2013-10-28 09:23:19 PM  

Tax Boy: [southparkstudios.mtvnimages.com image 480x360]

"It's not my cheque, buddy"


I'm not your banker pal!
 
2013-10-28 09:28:34 PM  
harper is an emotionally crippled douchebag selling Canada, like Mulroney, to the highest bidder.

I wish him a slow, lingering and painful death ASAP

from natural causes
 
2013-10-28 09:43:58 PM  
The depressing thing is that, in the short term, none of this really matters. It won't take down the government. The only way that happens is if Conservative Members of Parliament defect and vote against Harper's budget bill (which would be a no-confidence vote that would trigger an election), which I don't see happening since it would likely cost them their own seats. He'll still be able to cobble together enough party support to survive a leadership challenge because 1) there's no one on deck to replace him, and 2) the money is still on his side.

Unfortunately, the more scandals come to light, the more the situation is akin to backing a rabid animal into a corner. Sure, Harper might lose his throne in 2015, but he has until then to push through any legislation he wants, and the less likely another Conservative majority becomes, the more he'll be in a rush to implement before then all the changes he wants to see. Changes that will take years/decades to undo.

Some might say that he wouldn't risk damaging the Conservative party brand, but IMO he doesn't care. The party is just a tool to him, and once he achieves his objectives ("You won't recognize Canada when I'm done with it") if he feels he has to smash that tool to bits on his way out the door, he will.
 
2013-10-28 09:56:36 PM  

apoptotic: The depressing thing is that, in the short term, none of this really matters. It won't take down the government. The only way that happens is if Conservative Members of Parliament defect and vote against Harper's budget bill (which would be a no-confidence vote that would trigger an election), which I don't see happening since it would likely cost them their own seats. He'll still be able to cobble together enough party support to survive a leadership challenge because 1) there's no one on deck to replace him, and 2) the money is still on his side.

Unfortunately, the more scandals come to light, the more the situation is akin to backing a rabid animal into a corner. Sure, Harper might lose his throne in 2015, but he has until then to push through any legislation he wants, and the less likely another Conservative majority becomes, the more he'll be in a rush to implement before then all the changes he wants to see. Changes that will take years/decades to undo.

Some might say that he wouldn't risk damaging the Conservative party brand, but IMO he doesn't care. The party is just a tool to him, and once he achieves his objectives ("You won't recognize Canada when I'm done with it") if he feels he has to smash that tool to bits on his way out the door, he will.


What? Politicians choosing their own careers over the integrity of the system? Unpossible!
 
2013-10-28 09:57:47 PM  

Glenford: This just keeps getting better and better. I love how it went from "It is with great regret that I accept Wright's resignation" to "I fired his ass".


And they ran on transparency and accountability.
 
2013-10-28 10:00:06 PM  

Kurohone: some_beer_drinker: BATMANATEE: Does this look like the face of a liar?

[img.photobucket.com image 400x503]

can we get rid of this fark tard now? how did this obvious douche sandwich get elected? oh, yeah, he stole the election...

How did he stealthe election?  I mean yes, there were the robocall shennaigans, but they didn't affect enough ridings to tilt the balance, AFAIK.

I mean, it's _appalling_ that he won.  Somehow Canadians decided to give a reactionary, corrupt government, a government that just weeks before had been caught literally writing the word 'NOT' on duly passed legislation before signing it to deny funding, and turned it from a minority into a majority government.  This happened, and I still don't really know how.  I'm guessing it was 'the evil you know' vs. 'I make Mitt Romney look principled Ignatiuk' and 'We Love the Moustache, but hate the Party'.

And what scares the crap out of me?  Next election might actually be _worse_.  Look at the opposition...if you dare.  Tom 'I just can't stop talking, even when I should' Mulcair, and Justin 'Trudeau!' Trudeau.  And I won't even have a meaningful vote this time...at least last time my riding was in play.  Now that I'm in the farm belt again, not so much.


We gave Harper a Majority because there's 1 Conservative party and 3 "Liberal" parties. (Liberal in quotation marks because one of the parties is literally called the Liberal party, for that guy reading on the bus who didn't know. I admire your taste in porn, but please put headphones on if you're going to listen to it on the bus, okay?) Also there is Quebec, which is that guy at the poker game who likes to fark with you by claiming he's won the hand by playing the Left Bower, so when he raises you All-In you can never be sure if he's actually got something or if he's just farking with you.

For the next Election... yeah. If Layton was still alive Canada would have a shot at having a decent alternative to Harper, but Mulcair and Trudeau are vastly unappealing. We're probably looking at another Conservative majority, but whether that's lead by Harper, or lead by someone else, is a question which might be more interesting in the next few years.
 
2013-10-28 10:04:26 PM  

God Is My Co-Pirate: Glenford: This just keeps getting better and better. I love how it went from "It is with great regret that I accept Wright's resignation" to "I fired his ass".

And they ran on transparency and accountability.


Dont they all...
 
2013-10-28 10:06:55 PM  
apoptotic:
Some might say that he wouldn't risk damaging the Conservative party brand, but IMO he doesn't care. The party is just a tool to him, and once he achieves his objectives ("You won't recognize Canada when I'm done with it") if he feels he has to smash that tool to bits on his way out the door, he will.

Even if it leads to an e-mail from him personally, I don't think this will wound Harper fatally or will even come close; it may however, result in musical chairs inside the party as I said above.  That aside, looking ahead a decade or so. I think that he'll go down as a darling in the history of Canadian conservatism if nothing else happens, but as for his imprint on Canada; no, I don't think Harper-ism will survive him. The entire government -- including federally-funded science -- is being run from his desk. That simply isn't sustainable in a country you want to have thriving. You need to have departments and civil servants who are experts in their fields fight things out and make recommendations that they can see becoming successful. People being emotionally invested in their jobs is what keeps them there.

Moreover, the current incarnation of the Reform Party that has been rebranded as the Conservative Party isn't a particularly wide coalition. To be a conservative in, say Cornerbrook, is different from being a conservative in Calgary. Nothing new here, a Republican from Manhattan and a Democrat from Alabama are very different animals. This leaves the red tories of Ontario no-where to go except to the Liberals.

---
To the Yank who wanted this explained. Canada has a bicameral legislature like the US but only the lower house -- Parliament -- is elected and actually passes laws. The Senate is basically a permanent staff of committees who tinker with the legislation passed by the house. Senators are not elected but appointed by the Prime Minister. Bills are passed by the house, the senate recommendations, this process is repeated twice more and the bill becomes law once someone called the Governor General signs it.

Even if you were to abolish the Senate to-morrow, you'd still need to do the committee work so not much would change.
 
2013-10-28 10:11:32 PM  

Jim_Callahan: Fabric_Man: Hi, I'm a dumb yank. Can anyone here offer a little background into what's happening in Ottawa? The only thing I can get from TFA is that Harper may have misspent some funds on... something or other.

Duffy was basically using government funds as a personal checking account, buying whatever luxuries and shiat he wanted for himself, using a loophole in how residency is declared to get is all classed as "living expenses".  A loophole that, it turns out, wasn't actually a loophole and was just straight-up illegal.  Additionally, he's claimed a bunch of "travel expenses" that weren't actually part of his job and so on.

The rest of it is pretty much the standard parade of excuses and accusations that follow any exposure of blatant corruption.


Was illegal?  That has yet to be proven.  Was even against Senate rules?  Again, hard to say.  Was it morally wrong?  Yes, it certainly appears so.  But it also appears that Duffy ran his expenditures by the Conservative leaders in the Senate and the PMO and it was given an okay.

Duffy and Wallin expensed Canadians, in part, for fund raising expenses for the Conservative Party.  I have no sympathy for Wallin, Duffy, Harb or Brazeau or any one else who uses their station to steal. Once they're found guilty of that they should pay for their crimes.  If what they did is not a crime it should be.

That said, Harper is a secretive prick who has blown the gains made by the Liberals on the debt.  He has also passed a bunch of regressive legislation that has already been tried and rejected by the USA.  It was so bad that at one point we had Republican Texans and Reaganites coming to Canada to say don't emulate our policies on drug prohibition - they don't work.  But Harper did it anyway because he puts ideology over a rationality.

I look forward to a new government, which will likely be Trudeau.  I have no doubt he, or anybody for that matter, will do a better job than Harper.  Say what you want about Trudeau but he's not Harper.

And I voted for Harper in the last federal election.
 
2013-10-28 10:11:51 PM  

God Is My Co-Pirate: Glenford: This just keeps getting better and better. I love how it went from "It is with great regret that I accept Wright's resignation" to "I fired his ass".

And they ran on transparency and accountability.


Wasn't senate reform (hah!) a big part of their platform at some point?
 
2013-10-28 10:54:23 PM  
Funnily enough, I was just at a small event at a bar in downtown Toronto where Senator David Smith was speaking - he did talk about the Senate brouhaha including this latest development. He himself wasn't convinced that the three were entirely innocent, but had the same concerns about due process with regards to suspending them without pay.

Not sure where I stand on it myself - I can understand the due process argument, but I've also heard a rebuttal to the tune of that it's not so much a case of somebody being deprived of rights as it is of an employer exercising legal power over its subordinates. But then again, the employer in question is the government, so that obviously complicates that argument.

One thing I do know for sure: this whole thing is hilarious (and getting more so by the day).
 
2013-10-28 10:56:02 PM  

GWSuperfan: gaslight: Wallin and Duffy have no reason to be discrete any more to protect their party.

How does them being separate and distinct protect the party? Were they in danger of merging into some super-politician or something?


LOL math

/I actually did LOL though
 
2013-10-28 11:23:07 PM  
rattchett:

I look forward to a new government, which will likely be Trudeau.  I have no doubt he, or anybody for that matter, will do a better job than Harper.  Say what you want about Trudeau but he's not Harper.

The problem is Trudeau isn't _anything_.  He's a cipher.  He's the ghost of of the idea of Pierre, only less charismatic, and with virtually no political sense.  He'll probably end up leading the Party back to the official opposition, but that will be less due to him and more due to....

...Tom Mulcair!  The only person in Canadian federal politics who might have _less_ political sense than Trudeau!  The man whose vision of Canada's future is 'We're not the Conservatives!"

Quebec might be where the election is decided in 2015.  I honestly don't know how much support Trudeau has been gathering there based on his heritage, or if QC is still going it's own way and sticking with the NDP.  Trudeau will probably pick up seats in Ontario, as the voters there I think are getting tired of the shenanigans.  The west of course will go solid blue (dammit), and the Maritimes + Newfoundland don't have enough seats to matter.  If the Liberals take Quebec they'll probably get a minority government; if the NDP holds it, it'll be another Conservative majority.
 
2013-10-28 11:56:57 PM  

Biological Ali: Funnily enough, I was just at a small event at a bar in downtown Toronto where Senator David Smith was speaking - he did talk about the Senate brouhaha including this latest development. He himself wasn't convinced that the three were entirely innocent, but had the same concerns about due process with regards to suspending them without pay.

Not sure where I stand on it myself - I can understand the due process argument, but I've also heard a rebuttal to the tune of that it's not so much a case of somebody being deprived of rights as it is of an employer exercising legal power over its subordinates. But then again, the employer in question is the government, so that obviously complicates that argument.

One thing I do know for sure: this whole thing is hilarious (and getting more so by the day).


Thing is, Senators don't work for the Government of the day.  They work for the Crown, which is a different legal entity, which takes advice from the Government, but is not required to do so.  The 'employer disciplining an employee' argument is not valid, and won't pass muster in the courts.  But the Tories are grasping at straws right now...
 
2013-10-29 12:59:43 AM  

costermonger: God Is My Co-Pirate: Glenford: This just keeps getting better and better. I love how it went from "It is with great regret that I accept Wright's resignation" to "I fired his ass".

And they ran on transparency and accountability.

Wasn't senate reform (hah!) a big part of their platform at some point?


Well yeah, back when all the senators were liberal.  But since the liberal party have been shiatting the bed for the past decade and the conservatives have been able to load up the senate, they're totally cool with the senate again.
 
2013-10-29 01:08:35 AM  

CanuckInCA: costermonger: God Is My Co-Pirate: Glenford: This just keeps getting better and better. I love how it went from "It is with great regret that I accept Wright's resignation" to "I fired his ass".

And they ran on transparency and accountability.

Wasn't senate reform (hah!) a big part of their platform at some point?

Well yeah, back when all the senators were liberal.  But since the liberal party have been shiatting the bed for the past decade and the conservatives have been able to load up the senate, they're totally cool with the senate again.


Actually, with Conservative gains in Ontario, they still want to abolish/reform the Senate, but before it can happen the Supreme Court will have to weigh in on whether Harper has the authority to fire the current Senators, who were appointed for "life" (to age 75).

In the last provincial election in Alberta, there were also federal Senate "candidates" on the ballot (but the electorate's choice wasn't binding on the PM/GG), so I think Harper is expecting the Supreme Court to say that he can't fire existing Senators but that as they retire their seats can either not be filled at all or filled by election.
 
2013-10-29 01:15:50 AM  

LizardOnAStick: Thing is, Senators don't work for the Government of the day. They work for the Crown, which is a different legal entity, which takes advice from the Government, but is not required to do so. The 'employer disciplining an employee' argument is not valid, and won't pass muster in the courts. But the Tories are grasping at straws right now...


The way I see it, the entity you "work for" is the entity that pays your salary. Though yeah, the fact that they weren't appointed directly by the PM may well be relevant here.
 
2013-10-29 02:10:30 AM  
American farkers: "who?"
 
2013-10-29 07:12:57 AM  

SN1987a goes boom: Is that a real photo? I'd be willing to believe, given the current state of politics, that it is.


Quite real. It's not even the worst. Harper's a scary-effective politician, and not bad looking, but he's remarkably un-photogenic at times.

/   GIS 'harper cowboy' sometime.
//   That kitten looks really annoyed.
 
2013-10-29 07:16:15 AM  

Barfmaker: Fabric_Man: Hi, I'm a dumb yank. Can anyone here offer a little background into what's happening in Ottawa? The only thing I can get from TFA is that Harper may have misspent some funds on... something or other.

It's sort of complicated, but this is about our senate which is different from yours because we they're appointed, not elected, and they don't actually do anything. Except now they figured out how to game the system so a few of them who were appointed by our PM McSweaterVest KittenPants have been lining their pockets by claiming expenses that weren't really claimable and the chief of staff for our PM McSV KP even covered the bill to the tune of 90k for one but then got caught out and fired/resigned.

So the senators have been getting thrown under a bus by the administration and now the fat(test) one, Duffy, has just pulled the pin on a grenade in a crowded room and...well, stay tuned to see what happens.


Thanks Barfmaker.  I thought Duffy was actually in charge of something, something budget related.  Wasn't he the one who was on a fishing trip with his son in Nova Scotia and needed to get to a wedding so he order the military to send in a helicopter to pluck him out and get him to the church?  Please use small words in your explanation; I am from the US so I am barely literate.  Most of what I know of Canadian politics I learn from Rick Mercer
 
2013-10-29 07:39:35 AM  

Muta: Thanks Barfmaker. I thought Duffy was actually in charge of something, something budget related. Wasn't he the one who was on a fishing trip with his son in Nova Scotia and needed to get to a wedding so he order the military to send in a helicopter to pluck him out and get him to the church? Please use small words in your explanation; I am from the US so I am barely literate. Most of what I know of Canadian politics I learn from Rick Mercer


You're thinking of Defense Minister Peter MacKay. Duffy was the main parliament pundit for CTV News, our right-leaning news broadcast, prior to his appointment to the Senate. As a senator, he's literally known _only_ for this scandal.
 
2013-10-29 08:28:21 AM  

Kurohone: Quebec might be where the election is decided in 2015.  I honestly don't know how much support Trudeau has been gathering there based on his heritage, or if QC is still going it's own way and sticking with the NDP.  Trudeau will probably pick up seats in Ontario, as the voters there I think are getting tired of the shenanigans.  The west of course will go solid blue (dammit), and the Maritimes + Newfoundland don't have enough seats to matter.  If the Liberals take Quebec they'll probably get a minority government; if the NDP holds it, it'll be another Conservative majority.



I'm in Montreal, and from what I see and hear, Trudeau and the Liberals will take Quebec.  Hatred for Harper and his policies run deep (we still uphold a strong fracking moratorium provincially, which shows how lefty we are).

Especially now that, inexplicably, the Harper gov supported that anti-Quebec-referendum bill a week ago.

I have never heard a French Canadian have anything but contempt for most Conservatives.  The NDP gains in Quebec will probably swing back to the Liberals, and Conservative support in Ontario will drop.

I want Trudeau to win a nice tame MINORITY government.  Majority governments are too dangerous, especially ideological and dishonest ones.
 
2013-10-29 11:27:13 AM  
The Conservatives need hold a leadership review and turf Harper for this mess. His stupidity is now tainting the party as a whole. Without a viable alternative, we need to stay the course, but not with Harper in charge.
 
2013-10-29 11:41:56 AM  

Hebalo: The Conservatives need hold a leadership review and turf Harper for this mess. His stupidity is now tainting the party as a whole. Without a viable alternative, we need to stay the course, but not with Harper in charge.


The problem is there's not really anyone on deck to take his place. Having a leadership review and having him survive it would be worse than not having one at all.
 
Displayed 50 of 56 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report