If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Smoking hot 27-year-old blonde arrested for DUI claims she was molested in back of police car, is now suing Zima and Miller (w/pics)   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 140
    More: Interesting, Gary Zima, patrol cars  
•       •       •

32471 clicks; posted to Main » on 23 Oct 2013 at 4:00 AM (46 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



140 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-10-22 08:02:55 PM
Holy shiat
 
2013-10-22 08:05:56 PM
You don't ride in the back, if there were two cops they both should have been up front. Someone is obviously lying. Is there not video?
 
2013-10-22 08:23:08 PM
They haven't made Zima since 2008, Subbs.
 
2013-10-22 08:25:57 PM
That was beautiful, subby.
 
2013-10-22 08:40:43 PM

feckingmorons: You don't ride in the back, if there were two cops they both should have been up front. Someone is obviously lying. Is there not video?


I was thinking the same thing. She says that the officer texted her after the incident, it should be easy enough to verify that.
 
2013-10-22 08:41:39 PM
I bet those cops brought up her Facebook page as soon as they had her id. Saw her pics, then commenced to rapin'

Murica, fark yeah.
 
2013-10-22 08:44:05 PM

TheCheese: They haven't made Zima since 2008, Subbs.


You know how I know you didn't RTFA?
 
2013-10-22 08:51:26 PM
'Officer Zima had the opportunity to rectalfy this mistake and to come forward.'

I'm sure he did.
 
2013-10-22 09:47:07 PM

feckingmorons: You don't ride in the back, if there were two cops they both should have been up front.


I don't know, in that situation it's normally one up front and one in the back. Wait, are we talking about the same thing?
 
2013-10-22 11:53:49 PM

TheCheese: They haven't made Zima since 2008, Subbs.


False.

They just don't sell it where you are.
 
FNG [TotalFark]
2013-10-23 12:19:22 AM
1) Yes, the woman is attractive for the "smoking hot" reluctant crowd
2) The woman claims she tried to make "eye contact" with the female cop who was driving, why the fark didn't she scream her head off that "THIS MAN IS FINGERING ME MAKE IT STOP"

so, I see at least one hole in this story.
 
2013-10-23 12:27:58 AM

FNG: 1) Yes, the woman is attractive for the "smoking hot" reluctant crowd
2) The woman claims she tried to make "eye contact" with the female cop who was driving, why the fark didn't she scream her head off that "THIS MAN IS FINGERING ME MAKE IT STOP"

so, I see at least one hole in this story.

You won't shout, as I fiddle a-bout...
fiddle a-bout, fiddle a-bout, fiddle about... ♫
 
2013-10-23 12:39:15 AM

FNG: 2) The woman claims she tried to make "eye contact" with the female cop who was driving, why the fark didn't she scream her head off that "THIS MAN IS FINGERING ME MAKE IT STOP"

so, I see at least one hole in this story.


i thought that too until I got to this

Adding another layer of acknowledgement to the saga, Hannigan says that Zima looked up her cell phone number from police records and texted her a few days after the incident, asking how she was doing.
 
2013-10-23 12:44:16 AM

MaudlinMutantMollusk: FNG: 1) Yes, the woman is attractive for the "smoking hot" reluctant crowd
2) The woman claims she tried to make "eye contact" with the female cop who was driving, why the fark didn't she scream her head off that "THIS MAN IS FINGERING ME MAKE IT STOP"

so, I see at least one hole in this story.

♫You won't shout, as I fiddle a-bout...
fiddle a-bout, fiddle a-bout, fiddle about... ♫


You're such a wicked uncle, Ernie.
 
2013-10-23 12:44:47 AM

log_jammin: FNG: 2) The woman claims she tried to make "eye contact" with the female cop who was driving, why the fark didn't she scream her head off that "THIS MAN IS FINGERING ME MAKE IT STOP"

so, I see at least one hole in this story.

i thought that too until I got to this

Adding another layer of acknowledgement to the saga, Hannigan says that Zima looked up her cell phone number from police records and texted her a few days after the incident, asking how she was doing.


Yeah... I'm usually not one to doubt a sexual assault claim, but it sounds like she did the ole "maybe we can work out another way" and then changed her tune afterwards when it didn't work.
 
2013-10-23 12:55:12 AM

Rhino_man: Yeah... I'm usually not one to doubt a sexual assault claim, but it sounds like she did the ole "maybe we can work out another way" and then changed her tune afterwards when it didn't work.


I don't know. My money is on her story being at least most'y true. I've actually seen a cop(former cop now) be dumb enough to start texting someone he wrote a ticket to, by getting the number from the records.
 
2013-10-23 01:02:19 AM

log_jammin: Rhino_man: Yeah... I'm usually not one to doubt a sexual assault claim, but it sounds like she did the ole "maybe we can work out another way" and then changed her tune afterwards when it didn't work.

I don't know. My money is on her story being at least most'y true. I've actually seen a cop(former cop now) be dumb enough to start texting someone he wrote a ticket to, by getting the number from the records.


If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?

It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.
 
2013-10-23 01:07:36 AM

Rhino_man: If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?


even if it was consensual the cop is still in the wrong.

Rhino_man: It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.


very PUNgent.
 
2013-10-23 01:16:03 AM

log_jammin: Rhino_man: If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?

even if it was consensual the cop is still in the wrong.

Rhino_man: It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.

very PUNgent.


Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.
 
2013-10-23 01:24:24 AM

Rhino_man: Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.


I'm not going to call it an article since it's the Daily Mail, but "the thing" says she is suing, so it's civil, not criminal.
 
2013-10-23 02:07:14 AM

log_jammin: Rhino_man: Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.

I'm not going to call it an article since it's the Daily Mail, but "the thing" says she is suing, so it's civil, not criminal.


Fair 'nuff.
 
2013-10-23 03:44:03 AM

doglover: TheCheese: They haven't made Zima since 2008, Subbs.

False.

They just don't sell it where you are.



IIRC, it's available in Japan.
 
2013-10-23 03:45:05 AM

The_Sponge: doglover: TheCheese: They haven't made Zima since 2008, Subbs.

False.

They just don't sell it where you are.


IIRC, it's available in Japan.


I think that's where doglover is if I remember right.
 
2013-10-23 04:01:51 AM

TheCheese: They haven't made Zima since 2008, Subbs.

 
2013-10-23 04:12:48 AM

log_jammin: I don't know. My money is on her story being at least most'y true. I've actually seen a cop(former cop now) be dumb enough to start texting someone he wrote a ticket to, by getting the number from the records


I once listened to an interview with porn star Nikki Benz, and she told a story about how she got pulled over for speeding by a LAPD officer.  A couple of days later the officer called her up (using the number he got from her records) and asked her out on a date.  Naturally, she was a little disturbed by it.
 
2013-10-23 04:15:02 AM

log_jammin: Rhino_man: Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.

I'm not going to call it an article since it's the Daily Mail, but "the thing" says she is suing, so it's civil, not criminal.


But, if they can win in a civil suit, can they not take the evidence from it and if the D.A. is willing use that to file criminal charges and use that against them in court?
 
2013-10-23 04:19:30 AM

Bigdogdaddy: log_jammin: Rhino_man: Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.

I'm not going to call it an article since it's the Daily Mail, but "the thing" says she is suing, so it's civil, not criminal.

But, if they can win in a civil suit, can they not take the evidence from it and if the D.A. is willing use that to file criminal charges and use that against them in court?


upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-10-23 04:19:52 AM
This seems like a "he said, she said" thing.
I'm going to reserve judgment until the official investigation is completed by Det. Jaegerbomb.
 
2013-10-23 04:28:08 AM

Rhino_man: log_jammin: FNG: 2) The woman claims she tried to make "eye contact" with the female cop who was driving, why the fark didn't she scream her head off that "THIS MAN IS FINGERING ME MAKE IT STOP"

so, I see at least one hole in this story.

i thought that too until I got to this

Adding another layer of acknowledgement to the saga, Hannigan says that Zima looked up her cell phone number from police records and texted her a few days after the incident, asking how she was doing.

Yeah... I'm usually not one to doubt a sexual assault claim, but it sounds like she did the ole "maybe we can work out another way" and then changed her tune afterwards when it didn't work.


The thing with that theory is that the if someone said "maybe we can work out another way" you'd be expecting a little more than a grope.

I'm torn, I mostly believe it, assaulted woman like a rabbit stuck in the headlights, reported it straight away (but not to the cop in the front), texts continuing to pursue it civilly and not attempting to quash the DUI ... but then again it's in the mail.
 
2013-10-23 04:31:09 AM
If true she needs to put the entire SYSTEM on trial!
 
2013-10-23 04:35:09 AM

Bigdogdaddy: log_jammin: Rhino_man: Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.

I'm not going to call it an article since it's the Daily Mail, but "the thing" says she is suing, so it's civil, not criminal.

But, if they can win in a civil suit, can they not take the evidence from it and if the D.A. is willing use that to file criminal charges and use that against them in court?


not as far as I know
 
2013-10-23 04:54:41 AM
No. No one wants to touch that down there. Try again honey.
 
2013-10-23 04:57:57 AM
What was she wearing? I cant tell you if she deserved it or not..
 
2013-10-23 05:03:14 AM
Subby missed an opportunity to work in Long Island into the headline...missed an opportunity for an additional drink.

Seriously though, I have no idea if this happened or not and will never know unless later the cop admits it but I imagine this happens a lot more than it is reported and I commend her for coming forward.  A lot of sexual assaults go unreported and I imagine when the aggressor is involved with law enforcement it's even less likely to be reported. Either she's very stupid and vindictive or she's got ovaries of steel because it can't be easy to go through with this since the possibility of retaliation and harassment is very high in this case.  Either way it's in her best interests to probably move to another state as soon as realistically possible.

That being said, I think the majority of law enforcement personnel treat their jobs and their duties professionally but if this particular officer isn't she's doing the community a favor by coming forward with it so that maybe future victims can be spared.
 
2013-10-23 05:06:24 AM

MrBallou: TheCheese: They haven't made Zima since 2008, Subbs.

You know how I know you didn't RTFA?


So, that's the new "Wait, what?" comment.

How about you just saying, RTFA, instead of asking a question? Repeating what 1000s have done before makes you look like a tool.
 
2013-10-23 05:06:27 AM

Rhino_man: log_jammin: Rhino_man: If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?

even if it was consensual the cop is still in the wrong.

Rhino_man: It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.

very PUNgent.

Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.


1) In the US, it's always rape and always criminal if it's a sexual encounter between a police officer and someone in his custody.
2) Lots of women who are being raped freeze up during the assault.
 
2013-10-23 05:09:43 AM
Aha, another fishy-fingered flat-foot.
 
2013-10-23 05:11:16 AM
If it comes down to he/she said... I will believe her. Ratio of Bad:Good cops is about 95:5
 
2013-10-23 05:17:29 AM

spawn73: MrBallou: TheCheese: They haven't made Zima since 2008, Subbs.

You know how I know you didn't RTFA?

So, that's the new "Wait, what?" comment.

How about you just saying, RTFA, instead of asking a question? Repeating what 1000s have done before makes you look like a tool. people laugh because that's how memes work.


FTFY.
 
2013-10-23 05:18:42 AM

feckingmorons: You don't ride in the back, if there were two cops they both should have been up front. Someone is obviously lying. Is there not video?


You generally don't ride in the back unless you're busy raping the chick in your custody.  Also, cop cars generally don't have cameras pointing inside the car (although, now that you're mentioning it, it would be a good idea).
 
2013-10-23 05:19:40 AM

Rhino_man: log_jammin: Rhino_man: If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?

even if it was consensual the cop is still in the wrong.

Rhino_man: It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.

very PUNgent.

Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.


There is no such thing as consent when the other person is drunk.  Which the officer had been arresting her for... so he was obviously aware of her drunken state and her inability to properly weigh decisions to grant consent.
 
2013-10-23 05:22:26 AM

Rhino_man: log_jammin: Rhino_man: Yeah... I'm usually not one to doubt a sexual assault claim, but it sounds like she did the ole "maybe we can work out another way" and then changed her tune afterwards when it didn't work.

I don't know. My money is on her story being at least most'y true. I've actually seen a cop(former cop now) be dumb enough to start texting someone he wrote a ticket to, by getting the number from the records.

If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?

It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.


I think it'd be enough to scare me into submission if the driver just lets the other one get in the back seat with me while she drives.  IF a cop is going to do something bad right in the same car as their partner, they're typically an accomplice. And scared enough of him and a possibility he could get violent and no escape path for me, sitting there handcuffed.

Between the two, reason enough to not scream, a wasted effort that could only make matters worse.  The female cop may even be a victim as well who's mentally beat down just enough to let her partner have his way.  Either blackmail or subbing to the alpha, or truly psychopathic.
 
2013-10-23 05:27:54 AM

meanmutton: feckingmorons: You don't ride in the back, if there were two cops they both should have been up front. Someone is obviously lying. Is there not video?

You generally don't ride in the back unless you're busy raping the chick in your custody.  Also, cop cars generally don't have cameras pointing inside the car (although, now that you're mentioning it, it would be a good idea).


Used to be standard procedure to put one officer in the back but that was before they built the partitions between the front and back.

At least some police have in car cameras..http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/popped-cop-car
 
2013-10-23 05:29:37 AM

HindiDiscoMonster: If it comes down to he/she said... I will believe her. Ratio of Bad:Good cops is about 95:5


you have your pretty color because I find you humorous most of the time. It will be a shame if you lose it if you start derping too hard.
 
2013-10-23 05:29:52 AM

Alonjar: There is no such thing as consent when the other person is drunk.


[citation needed]

"Drunk" comes in a wide variety of states.  Blacked out to barely tipsy but just enough to make driving illegal.

On that lower end, if she said yes, it's not automatically rape because consent is impossible.

Take your crusade elsewhere.
 
2013-10-23 05:31:50 AM

omeganuepsilon: Rhino_man: log_jammin: Rhino_man: Yeah... I'm usually not one to doubt a sexual assault claim, but it sounds like she did the ole "maybe we can work out another way" and then changed her tune afterwards when it didn't work.

I don't know. My money is on her story being at least most'y true. I've actually seen a cop(former cop now) be dumb enough to start texting someone he wrote a ticket to, by getting the number from the records.

If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?

It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.

I think it'd be enough to scare me into submission if the driver just lets the other one get in the back seat with me while she drives.  IF a cop is going to do something bad right in the same car as their partner, they're typically an accomplice. And scared enough of him and a possibility he could get violent and no escape path for me, sitting there handcuffed.

Between the two, reason enough to not scream, a wasted effort that could only make matters worse.  The female cop may even be a victim as well who's mentally beat down just enough to let her partner have his way.  Either blackmail or subbing to the alpha, or truly psychopathic.


Heh. I shiat you not, there was an SVU episode last week (or the week before) that you pretty much recapped in your post.
 
2013-10-23 05:32:34 AM

omeganuepsilon: Alonjar: There is no such thing as consent when the other person is drunk.

[citation needed]

"Drunk" comes in a wide variety of states.  Blacked out to barely tipsy but just enough to make driving illegal.

On that lower end, if she said yes, it's not automatically rape because consent is impossible.

Take your crusade elsewhere.


yeah! maybe she was legitimately raped in the back seat of a police patrol vehicle!
 
2013-10-23 05:32:43 AM

Alonjar: Rhino_man: log_jammin: Rhino_man: If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?

even if it was consensual the cop is still in the wrong.

Rhino_man: It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.

very PUNgent.

Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.

There is no such thing as consent when the other person is drunk.  Which the officer had been arresting her for... so he was obviously aware of her drunken state and her inability to properly weigh decisions to grant consent.


oh come on.  you dont actually believe that do you?  So if im drunk and I run over kids, thats my fault.  If im drunk and I rob a bank, thats my fault.  If Im drunk and I lose my money in a casino, thats my fault.  If im drunk and I agree to sleep with someone, thats their fault?

you are a fool.
 
2013-10-23 05:42:59 AM

MagSeven: Heh. I shiat you not, there was an SVU episode last week (or the week before) that you pretty much recapped in your post.


Most of those shows pull from real life, either discussions or actual events, so eh.  I really don't watch much TV, much less cop dramas, those I avoid like the plague.  Enhance, enhance, ENHANCE! and things like it really annoy the shiat out of me.
/more partial to sci-fi, where you expect it to not be realistic
 
2013-10-23 05:50:17 AM

I sound fat: Alonjar: Rhino_man: log_jammin: Rhino_man: If it were JUST the texting, then I'd be with you... but the texting combined with her not saying a farking word to get the attention of the other officer?

even if it was consensual the cop is still in the wrong.

Rhino_man: It smells fishy to me.  Pun intended.

very PUNgent.

Truth.  It's unethical, and he should be fired... but I doubt the claim that it wasn't consensual, therefore I doubt that it was CRIMINAL.

There is no such thing as consent when the other person is drunk.  Which the officer had been arresting her for... so he was obviously aware of her drunken state and her inability to properly weigh decisions to grant consent.

oh come on.  you dont actually believe that do you?  So if im drunk and I run over kids, thats my fault.  If im drunk and I rob a bank, thats my fault.  If Im drunk and I lose my money in a casino, thats my fault.  If im drunk and I agree to sleep with someone, thats their fault?

you are a fool.


Actually, that's exactly how it works. You are considered unable to give consent if you are intoxicated. And sex without consent is rape.
 
Displayed 50 of 140 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report