Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WTOP)   World's seventh richest woman gets in car accident in Virginia, damaging her Porsche SUV. She killed some plebe, too, but let's try to stay focused on what's important, okay?   (wtop.com) divider line 95
    More: Sad, Porsche SUV, Northern Virginia, the heaviest people, Mars Inc.  
•       •       •

12016 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Oct 2013 at 10:22 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



95 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-10-09 09:55:53 AM  
The victim lived to 86 without wearing her seatbelt.  Impressive.  I'm sure her family won't sue the sh*t out of Mars for gross negligence.
 
2013-10-09 10:04:59 AM  
Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.
 
2013-10-09 10:08:28 AM  
It will be so awesome if they prove she was playing Candy Crush on her phone when she drove across the line.
 
2013-10-09 10:19:42 AM  
If you think she'll serve even one minute of jail time I've got a bridge to sell you...and it's made of chocolate.
 
2013-10-09 10:23:47 AM  

Walker: If you think she'll serve even one minute of jail time I've got a bridge to sell you...and it's made of chocolate.


It doesn't sound ...from that description at least... that she's done anything that would require jail time. If she was drunk or speeding or reckless, yes, but it sounds like it was an accident.

It probably wouldn't have been a tragic accident if the idiot had worn her seatbelt.
 
2013-10-09 10:23:51 AM  

enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.


Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.
 
2013-10-09 10:24:46 AM  

Carn: It will be so awesome if they prove she was playing Candy Crush on her phone when she drove across the line.


She's in her 70s, if she even owns a phone on which Candy Crush can be installed I'd be impressed.
 
2013-10-09 10:24:51 AM  
Not wearing a seatbelt.  No sympathy.
 
2013-10-09 10:24:59 AM  
Was she sexting?

No pictures, please.
 
2013-10-09 10:25:06 AM  

kronicfeld: Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


You can't control the other driver. You can, however, prevent yourself from rattling around like a ping pong ball if the other driver hits you.
 
2013-10-09 10:25:54 AM  

kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


They were both negligent.  It's like offsetting penalties in football but you don't get to replay the down.
 
2013-10-09 10:26:23 AM  
Badger Badger  Badger  Badger  MARS BAR
 
2013-10-09 10:27:00 AM  
With all of the old people that are in this incident, I think we should just count our blessings that no farmer's market was involved.
 
2013-10-09 10:28:27 AM  

what_now: Walker: If you think she'll serve even one minute of jail time I've got a bridge to sell you...and it's made of chocolate.

It doesn't sound ...from that description at least... that she's done anything that would require jail time. If she was drunk or speeding or reckless, yes, but it sounds like it was an accident.

It probably wouldn't have been a tragic accident if the idiot had worn her seatbelt.


Mars' Porsche crossed the center line into oncoming traffic.  That's going to lead to very bad things 9 times out of 10.
 
2013-10-09 10:28:31 AM  

DoBeDoBeDo: They were both negligent.


One of them caused the collision. The other didn't. This is not BSABSVD1.

1Both Sides Are Bad So Vote Defendant
 
2013-10-09 10:28:44 AM  
oh come on, i dont think barbara bush is THAT rich.
 
2013-10-09 10:29:08 AM  
Don't you mean "8th richest"?
 
2013-10-09 10:29:31 AM  

kronicfeld: Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


One person can cause an accident while the other person can cause it to be severe. It's not an either/or proposition. Fault can be and often is apportioned to multiple involved parties in crashes, I don't see why the severity of injuries shouldn't also be taken into consideration if it can be reasonably surmised that the only reason the person was badly injured or killed is because they chose to make no effort to prevent the outcome. Why should one person's negligence be used to complete excuse another's?
 
2013-10-09 10:31:17 AM  
Mars? Driving? Hershey highway trifecta in play?
 
2013-10-09 10:31:19 AM  

skozlaw: kronicfeld: Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.

One person can cause an accident while the other person can cause it to be severe. It's not an either/or proposition. Fault can be and often is apportioned to multiple involved parties in crashes, I don't see why the severity of injuries shouldn't also be taken into consideration if it can be reasonably surmised that the only reason the person was badly injured or killed is because they chose to make no effort to prevent the outcome. Why should one person's negligence be used to complete excuse another's?


Just so you know, you are arguing with a lawyer.
 
2013-10-09 10:31:32 AM  
You got your Porsche in my minivan.
You got your Minivan in my Porsche.

Mars' PorscheVan Crunch
Two great tastes that go great together.
 
2013-10-09 10:31:35 AM  

kronicfeld: DoBeDoBeDo: They were both negligent.

One of them caused the collision. The other didn't. This is not BSABSVD1.

1Both Sides Are Bad So Vote Defendant


Virginia has seat belt laws, the victims lack of following the law shouldn't mean extra charges on the defendant.
 
2013-10-09 10:31:56 AM  
I think the survivinf family should be awarded every last penny of the victim's lost wages.
 
2013-10-09 10:33:43 AM  
Oh, come now. The accident had nothing to do with wealth, or how fancy the car was. It was because she was a woman.
 
2013-10-09 10:36:10 AM  
You take your victim as you find him. If the victim was not himself or herself a contributing cause to the occurrence of the negligence, then it is irrelevant whether the victim was particularly more or particularly less prone to injury for any reason.
 
2013-10-09 10:36:56 AM  
The Loudoun County Sheriff's Office says Mars, who turns 74 Thursday, was driving a Porsche SUV in Aldie on Friday when it crossed the center line and hit a minivan. The sheriff's office says 86-year-old minivan passenger Irene Ellisor of Huntsville, Texas, was not wearing a seatbelt and died at the scene.  The Loudoun County Coroner remarked, "74 and 86? My job is already half done here."
 
2013-10-09 10:38:04 AM  
But is she single?

/I'll do conjugal visits for $10mil in the will
//who am I kidding. $10, cash up front
 
2013-10-09 10:39:35 AM  
Seatbelts help keep ya from bouncing around (or out) of your car.  Was going to post something about how old people should be retested every couple years to be able to legally drive.  Or how we have some really huge passenger vehicles on the road, and some really small ones...the small vehicles don't stand a chance.

But hard to be outraged if you're not wearing ya damn seatbelt
 
2013-10-09 10:39:38 AM  

kronicfeld: You take your victim as you find him. If the victim was not himself or herself a contributing cause to the occurrence of the negligence, then it is irrelevant whether the victim was particularly more or particularly less prone to injury for any reason.


That's not the point. Why shouldn't that be considered? I'm not saying it is, but upon what justification is it not?
 
2013-10-09 10:40:56 AM  
Mars co-owner? MARS co-owner? Farking government sold off a whole planet? Thanks, Obama!

/If you're 86 and get in a head-on collision at any speed at all, seat belt's probably not going to save you. That Delta V is a mofo.
 
GBB
2013-10-09 10:42:05 AM  
TFA:"filled with sorrow for the loss of life"

Most depressing candy bar ingredient ever.

/Unless it's chocolate covered, then it breaks even.
 
2013-10-09 10:42:33 AM  

kronicfeld: You take your victim as you find him. If the victim was not himself or herself a contributing cause to the occurrence of the negligence, then it is irrelevant whether the victim was particularly more or particularly less prone to injury for any reason.


I disagree. If the lady was wearing a seatbelt, and she walked away from that crash with like..a broken arm.. we wouldn't be hearing about this.
 
2013-10-09 10:43:21 AM  

kronicfeld: Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


We should stop telling people to wear their seat-belt, because "blaming the victim".
 
2013-10-09 10:45:12 AM  

skozlaw: kronicfeld: You take your victim as you find him. If the victim was not himself or herself a contributing cause to the occurrence of the negligence, then it is irrelevant whether the victim was particularly more or particularly less prone to injury for any reason.

That's not the point. Why shouldn't that be considered? I'm not saying it is, but upon what justification is it not?


Possibly because it opens up a pretty large gray area as far as assumptions on what "could" have happened?

/Not a lawyer
//Not frozen or a caveman, either
 
2013-10-09 10:45:25 AM  
The patrons of the Aldie Farmers Market felt a great weight lifted from their shoulders, though they knew not why...
 
2013-10-09 10:46:49 AM  
World's seventh richest woman gets in car accident in Virginia, damaging her Porsche SUV. She killed some plebe, too, but let's try to stay focused on what's important, okay?

Right, subby.  Like the fact that there was a fatal car crash and WTF does it matter that a rich person was involved.  You are the supreme champion on what's important.  And rich.
 
2013-10-09 10:47:13 AM  

kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


I didn't say the other driver couldn't be criminally charged, just that the injuries would have been far less had the seatbelt been used properly.
 
2013-10-09 10:47:32 AM  

LemSkroob: Oh, come now. The accident had nothing to do with wealth, or how fancy the car was. It was because she was a woman.


If only she'd driven a clunker incapable of going above 60.
 
2013-10-09 10:49:12 AM  
Was this her?

houston.culturemap.com
 
2013-10-09 10:49:16 AM  

mbillips: Mars co-owner? MARS co-owner? Farking government sold off a whole planet? Thanks, Obama!

/If you're 86 and get in a head-on collision at any speed at all, seat belt's probably not going to save you. That Delta V is a mofo.


I own Uranus

/NTTAWWT
 
2013-10-09 10:51:13 AM  

enry: I didn't say the other driver couldn't be criminally charged, just that the injuries would have been far less had the seatbelt been used properly.


Since we don't know what her injuries were, we don't know that the seatbelt would have helped. I've seen elderly/infirm/brittle people severely injured in collisions that don't look particularly "catastrophic" on their face.
 
2013-10-09 10:51:20 AM  

stampylives: oh come on, i dont think barbara bush is THAT rich.


Wrong Bush, but I do so love to see this brought back up.

gallery.socionix.com

But in due fairness, it might have been the Joker.
 
2013-10-09 10:53:13 AM  
Whar seats belts? WHAR?

lovablelabelsblog.com
 
2013-10-09 10:53:14 AM  

skozlaw: kronicfeld: Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.

One person can cause an accident while the other person can cause it to be severe. It's not an either/or proposition. Fault can be and often is apportioned to multiple involved parties in crashes, I don't see why the severity of injuries shouldn't also be taken into consideration if it can be reasonably surmised that the only reason the person was badly injured or killed is because they chose to make no effort to prevent the outcome. Why should one person's negligence be used to complete excuse another's?


Here's the thing that you might be missing.  The accident wouldn't have happened AT ALL if the lady hadn't crossed the center line.  Period. End of story.  It doesn't matter if the victim was or was not wearing a seatbelt.  It's who is AT FAULT for the accident.
 
2013-10-09 10:53:52 AM  
The old crone had it coming.  I'm glad she's dead, and I hope she burns in hell.
 
2013-10-09 10:54:01 AM  

skozlaw: kronicfeld: You take your victim as you find him. If the victim was not himself or herself a contributing cause to the occurrence of the negligence, then it is irrelevant whether the victim was particularly more or particularly less prone to injury for any reason.

That's not the point. Why shouldn't that be considered? I'm not saying it is, but upon what justification is it not?


Depends on the state.Virginia has a pure contributory negligence law, so the case could be thrown out if the Mars were able to show that the 86-year-old did anything negligent that contributed to the accident. I don't think you can claim negligence as a factor in the severity of injuries, though. Mars is 100 percent liable for the accident, and the old lady would have sustained no injuries if Mars had stayed on her side of the road, so I don't think you can argue that not wearing a seatbelt was negligent. If the old lady had been on the phone and that caused her to fail to swerve out of Mars' way, that would be different.

/People who think it's weird the old lady made it to 86 without wearing a seat belt. NOBODY wore seatbelts prior to about 1980, except for a few safety nerds, and most cars didn't even have seatbelts until the mid-1960s. And 99.9-something percent got away with it their entire driving careers.Same goes for bike helmets, but you can add some decimal places.

//Porsche and SUV are not words that should be in close proximity. The Cayenne and Panamera are abominations unto the gods of motoring.
 
2013-10-09 10:55:02 AM  
Everyone makes mistakes when driving and money has nothing to do with the cause of the accident or whether someone dies. But that won't stop someone thinking "oh my god filthy rich person did something wrong, now I have an excuse to sue and get mine". If no rich person was involved we wouldn't be hearing about this incident, also sad.
 
2013-10-09 10:57:40 AM  
Oh, come now. The accident had nothing to do with wealth, or how fancy the car was. It was because she was an old woman.

FTFY
 
2013-10-09 10:59:20 AM  

kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


some courts have discussed whether an innocent driver's failure to wear a seatbelt should be a factor in the calculations of damages.  generally, all of us have a duty to mitigate the harm done to us, where possible, and some have argued that a failure to wear a seatbelt is a failure to mitigate the risk of harm.

that does not in any way affect liability, but when damages are calculated (after someone is found liable), the total recovery might be less because you have more damages than you would have had, had you have worn a seatbelt...

(i'm not a personal injury lawyer, so i don't remember whether/which courts are for or against the seatbelt argument... either way, it is a factor for the damages calculation, not the calculation of liability.  someone driving over the median into oncoming traffic is no less liable because she plowed into someone who was not wearing a seatbelt - and trying to argue otherwise is silly/trolly)
 
2013-10-09 11:00:45 AM  
Beeblebrox:   Was it her?


You don't know the difference between a Mars bar and an Oh Henry! - time for a candy lineup!

12.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-10-09 11:01:27 AM  

Barbecue Bob: Whar seats belts? WHAR?

[lovablelabelsblog.com image 330x210]


They don't have seatbelts, but they have the metal supporting bar of the seat in front of you, right about mouth height, so that's better than nothing.
 
2013-10-09 11:03:13 AM  
I don't think you can argue that the dead lady's negligence contributed to the accident, so Mars is gonna lose that lawsuit. But financially, you could argue that the lack of seatbelt contributed to some percentage of the injuries, and if the hospital and funeral home are trying to get their money from the insurance companies, the old lady could be held liable for part of the payments. If she were the rich one, and Mars had no money, the victim could be liable for ALL of their claim, under joint and severable liability. That also might reduce the amount of the wrongful death claim award to the victim's family. But it's not a case of contributory negligence that could lead to the suit being tossed.
 
2013-10-09 11:04:06 AM  

what_now: Walker: If you think she'll serve even one minute of jail time I've got a bridge to sell you...and it's made of chocolate.

It doesn't sound ...from that description at least... that she's done anything that would require jail time. If she was drunk or speeding or reckless, yes, but it sounds like it was an accident.

It probably wouldn't have been a tragic accident if the idiot had worn her seatbelt.


Crossed the center line, head on collision, killed a person. At the very least it's involuntary manslaughter.
I'd like to live in your world, where you can kill someone and not get in any trouble. Must be a cool place.
 
2013-10-09 11:04:53 AM  
what_now:  It probably wouldn't have been a tragic accident if the idiot had worn her seatbelt.

If the victim had been wearing a seatbelt, she might have survived.  Too many variables in play, so it's impossible to say for sure.

If the murderer had stayed in her lane of travel, there would have been no accident.  The likelihood of this scenario approaches 100%.

/as does the likelihood that I've been trolololed
 
2013-10-09 11:10:38 AM  
I wonder if being the world's 7th richest woman is like being the world's 7th tallest midget.
 
2013-10-09 11:10:57 AM  

Walker: what_now: Walker: If you think she'll serve even one minute of jail time I've got a bridge to sell you...and it's made of chocolate.

It doesn't sound ...from that description at least... that she's done anything that would require jail time. If she was drunk or speeding or reckless, yes, but it sounds like it was an accident.

It probably wouldn't have been a tragic accident if the idiot had worn her seatbelt.

Crossed the center line, head on collision, killed a person. At the very least it's involuntary manslaughter.
I'd like to live in your world, where you can kill someone and not get in any trouble. Must be a cool place.


Unless she can prove the car's steering linkage broke or something. My guess is she nodded off in an Xanax-Scotch haze.She probably won't get hard time, though; expensive lawyers tend to be worth the money.
 
2013-10-09 11:11:32 AM  

Walker: If you think she'll serve even one minute of jail time I've got a bridge to sell you...and it's made of chocolate.


Please tell us why anyone would serve jail time in this case, aside from your hatred of anyone who isn't broke.
 
2013-10-09 11:13:12 AM  
Huh.  This is the closest town to me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldie,_VA
 
2013-10-09 11:15:42 AM  

topcon: Walker: If you think she'll serve even one minute of jail time I've got a bridge to sell you...and it's made of chocolate.

Please tell us why anyone would serve jail time in this case, aside from your hatred of anyone who isn't broke.


Uh, vehicular homicide? You're supposed to keep your car under control. If it's "just an accident," that's one thing, but if she was the teensiest bit drunk or high or texting, that's manslaughter.
 
2013-10-09 11:15:57 AM  

kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


No, but if she'd been wearing her seat belt, she'd have survived the head-on crash IN A FARKING 25MPH ZONE.
 
2013-10-09 11:17:35 AM  

Rhino_man: kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.

No, but if she'd been wearing her seat belt, she'd have survived the head-on crash IN A FARKING 25MPH ZONE.


I'm sure the woman in the Porsche was going 25 mph.
 
2013-10-09 11:20:41 AM  

kronicfeld: enry: I didn't say the other driver couldn't be criminally charged, just that the injuries would have been far less had the seatbelt been used properly.

Since we don't know what her injuries were, we don't know that the seatbelt would have helped. I've seen elderly/infirm/brittle people severely injured in collisions that don't look particularly "catastrophic" on their face.


She wasn't wearing a seatbelt.  That should really be the end of the discussion.  I'm not trying to sound all Ron Paul and say 'let her die since she didn't have insurance', but I'm getting a bit tired of people ignoring safety devices that have been proven time and time again to save lives and reduce injuries (motorcyle helmets too) because they think it crimps their style.  Every car in the past 30-ish years have had shoulder belts, and even cars back in the 60s had at least lap belts.  No excuse.
 
2013-10-09 11:21:24 AM  

Walker: Rhino_man: kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.

No, but if she'd been wearing her seat belt, she'd have survived the head-on crash IN A FARKING 25MPH ZONE.

I'm sure the woman in the Porsche was going 25 mph.


It's a 2-lane road in Aldie.  There's no choice.  9 times out of 10, you're stuck behind a farmer bringing produce or horses to Middleburg.

Trust me, man.  Loudoun County ain't like the rest of NoVA.
 
2013-10-09 11:21:52 AM  

Walker: Rhino_man: kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.

No, but if she'd been wearing her seat belt, she'd have survived the head-on crash IN A FARKING 25MPH ZONE.

I'm sure the woman in the Porsche was going 25 mph.



It was a Porsche Cayenne SUV being driven by an elderly woman.  Just because it has a Porsche badge on it, doesn't mean that it is automatically going to be driven everywhere at light speed.  The place I work is surrounded by a few affluent "old money" neighborhoods and there are lots of Porsches and Aston Martins dawdling along at five under the speed limit.
 
2013-10-09 11:23:27 AM  

kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


That is an example of the same logic that blames the gun manufacturer or car manufacturer for damages done by a user of one of their products.
 
2013-10-09 11:24:11 AM  

akya: I wonder if being the world's 7th richest woman is like being the world's 7th tallest midget.


She's be the 1st richest woman if it wasn't for the patriarchy keeping her down.
 
2013-10-09 11:36:39 AM  
She wasn't wearing her seatbelt, so really it's the poors fault again, as usual.
 
2013-10-09 11:37:11 AM  

Beeblebrox: Was this her?

[houston.culturemap.com image 300x225]


Came to thread for Sue Ellen Mischke, leaving appointed.
 
2013-10-09 11:39:56 AM  
Virginia is a Contributory Negligence state - so it doesn't have to be 100% one person's fault.
It is very common for insurance companies to accept liability for some of the injuries in a no seatbelt situation, but not pay the full amount. So, pay what would be the expected injuries to someone seatbelted in - in this case it can probably be proven by the injuries suffered by the other passengers in the van who were strapped in.
An 86 year old woman - or anyone for that matter - could easily be killed by a simple fall, let alone a vehicle accident.
Now, none of this will stop the family from suing the Mars lady.

/Don't drive until your back seat passengers are strapped in. If nothing else, they could fly forward and hit you in the head in a severe accident.
 
2013-10-09 11:46:13 AM  

justtray: She wasn't wearing her seatbelt, so really it's the poors fault again, as usual.


She probat sold the buckle to a scrapyard to afford more coconut rum, as the poors often do
 
2013-10-09 11:48:59 AM  
 One would hope that she would spend the rest of her life in jail like anyone else, but we all know that given her wealth she'll likely get an apology from the court for any inconvenience this may have caused her.
 
2013-10-09 11:59:15 AM  
Mars should pull a Helen Brach.
 
2013-10-09 12:19:11 PM  

HypnozombieX: One would hope that she would spend the rest of her life in jail like anyone else, but we all know that given her wealth she'll likely get an apology from the court for any inconvenience this may have caused her.


Yeah, because as we all know, all the poor people involved in traffic accidents get thrown in the gulag for life.
 
2013-10-09 12:21:16 PM  

kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.


Not at all, but it could have turned an accident that caused an injury, into an accident that caused a death.  it doesn't make the guilty party any more or less guilty based on whether a seat belt was being worn, but it could have easily contributed to the severity of the crash.
 
2013-10-09 12:27:08 PM  

tommyl66: Possibly because it opens up a pretty large gray area as far as assumptions on what "could" have happened


That's what investigators and experts are for. If we only worked on what we could prove beyond every conceivable doubt we wouldn't even need crime scene investigators.

It seems silly that we go to the trouble of deciding what percentage of fault to assign to each participant for causing the accident but don't bother to go the extra step to determine who's responsible for what percent of the damage beyond that. Why should a person who made a minor mistake be held responsible for major consequences because of the actions of the victim?
 
2013-10-09 12:32:34 PM  
FTFA:

A Mars spokesman says the tragedy has left Mars "filled with sorrow for the loss of life"

I always thought they were filled with nougat and caramel... maybe this is a new flavor?
 
2013-10-09 12:33:50 PM  

AGremlin: Beeblebrox: Was this her?

[houston.culturemap.com image 300x225]

Came to thread for Sue Ellen Mischke, leaving appointed.


Same here. Although I am sad it took a while and with so little love.

Seems like farkers have a stick up their butt lately.

/fark, you used to be fun!
 
2013-10-09 12:38:42 PM  

Walker: If you think she'll serve even one minute of jail time I've got a bridge to sell you...and it's made of chocolate.


I doubt she will, unless investigation shows alcohol.

She is looking at a significant wrongful death suit, though.
 
2013-10-09 01:01:32 PM  

kronicfeld: 1Both Sides Are Bad So Vote Defendant


That's your farky now.
 
2013-10-09 01:04:49 PM  

Walker: Crossed the center line, head on collision, killed a person. At the very least it's involuntary manslaughter.


Yes, but she's rich and can afford lots of very good laywers to go up against a junior assistant DA fresh out of law school with no trial experience, so it's nothing.
 
2013-10-09 01:09:05 PM  
accidents happen
let's fast fwd to the end of the hearing/court case etc

-there was a crash that the rich chick is responsible for

-she isn't responsible for the death of someone who didn't wear the safety gear required by state law
 
2013-10-09 01:09:09 PM  
"Not going anywhere for a while?" .... because YOU'RE IN A DETOX PROGRAM??
 
2013-10-09 01:14:00 PM  
Aldie is a nice little town. In that area o Virginia, the grass and trees aren't just green; they are money green.
 
2013-10-09 01:42:46 PM  
Subby needs a Snickers.
www.slapcaption.com
 
2013-10-09 01:44:44 PM  
McGrits: Same here. Although I am sad it took a while and with so little love.

Seems like farkers have a stick up their butt lately.

/fark, you used to be fun!


Agreed.

It's should be "Real News. Real Funny."  The threads are becoming less entertaining than the comments section of  The Economist.

Been around since nearly the beginning; lurked for years.
 
2013-10-09 02:11:56 PM  

Another Government Employee: I doubt she will, unless investigation shows alcohol.


Investigation? You must have missed the part where she was described as "the world's seventh richest woman."
 
2013-10-09 02:18:30 PM  
Man sent to Pluto, woman is from Mars
 
2013-10-09 02:32:22 PM  
If I ever have a net worth of over...oh say...20 million dollars...I'm hiring a car and driver or taking taxis.  I'd never drive anywhere again.

/doesn't matter that the old lady wasn't wearing a seatbelt.
//surprised (and disappoined) at the number of farkers who think it does.
///hope you never get called for jury duty
 
2013-10-09 02:45:47 PM  

relaxitsjustme: If I ever have a net worth of over...oh say...20 million dollars...I'm hiring a car and driver or taking taxis.  I'd never drive anywhere again.

/doesn't matter that the old lady wasn't wearing a seatbelt.
//surprised (and disappoined) at the number of farkers who think it does.
///hope you never get called for jury duty


In a legal sense, I dunno.  I'd need the law explained to me by the lawyers on both sides.  As for cause-and-effect, I can tell you that she'd be alive today if either of the following were true:
1)  She wasn't in a car accident.
2)  She was wearing a seat belt.
 
2013-10-09 03:28:20 PM  

Land Ark: Virginia is a Contributory Negligence state - so it doesn't have to be 100% one person's fault.
It is very common for insurance companies to accept liability for some of the injuries in a no seatbelt situation, but not pay the full amount. So, pay what would be the expected injuries to someone seatbelted in - in this case it can probably be proven by the injuries suffered by the other passengers in the van who were strapped in.
An 86 year old woman - or anyone for that matter - could easily be killed by a simple fall, let alone a vehicle accident.
Now, none of this will stop the family from suing the Mars lady.

/Don't drive until your back seat passengers are strapped in. If nothing else, they could fly forward and hit you in the head in a severe accident.


The Land Ark lives.
 
2013-10-09 05:28:02 PM  

Rhino_man: Walker: Rhino_man: kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.

No, but if she'd been wearing her seat belt, she'd have survived the head-on crash IN A FARKING 25MPH ZONE.

I'm sure the woman in the Porsche was going 25 mph.

It's a 2-lane road in Aldie.  There's no choice.  9 times out of 10, you're stuck behind a farmer bringing produce or horses to Middleburg.

Trust me, man.  Loudoun County ain't like the rest of NoVA.


Yeah, even the plebes in horse country are rich.
 
2013-10-09 06:06:54 PM  
To commemorate this accident, they will start a new candy called "Crash!". It would be milky white on the outside, and when you bite into it, it will be crunchy and gooey. Just like a real vehicular accident.
 
2013-10-09 08:26:31 PM  

FrancoFile: Rhino_man: Walker: Rhino_man: kronicfeld: enry: Dunno, I'd say if you want to forego wearing a seatbelt you should agree not to use public funds for your medical bills nor be sued for any reason in the event of an accident.

Yeah, it's the lack of a seatbelt's fault that the other driver was negligent. Good call.

No, but if she'd been wearing her seat belt, she'd have survived the head-on crash IN A FARKING 25MPH ZONE.

I'm sure the woman in the Porsche was going 25 mph.

It's a 2-lane road in Aldie.  There's no choice.  9 times out of 10, you're stuck behind a farmer bringing produce or horses to Middleburg.

Trust me, man.  Loudoun County ain't like the rest of NoVA.

Yeah, even the plebes in horse country are rich.


For example.

*raises hand*

Rich has a different meaning out here, though. I'm in "don't have to worry about bills" territory, but not by much... and that takes more money than most families bring in.
 
2013-10-09 08:30:19 PM  
2) She was wearing a seat belt.

Wrong. Assumption of facts not in evidence.
 
2013-10-09 09:09:49 PM  

relaxitsjustme: 2) She was wearing a seat belt.

Wrong. Assumption of facts not in evidence.


10AM on Route 50 in Aldie means that neither of the vehicles was travelling faster than 40mph.  It's a 25mph zone and you don't have room to speed even if you want to.  The odds of surviving a head-on collision at 40mph or below are extremely high for people wearing seat belts.

I don't know the roads in Hawaii, so I wouldn't make such assumptions about a crash there.  I *DO* know the road in question (it's the ONLY road that goes through Aldie, for the record).  Trust me, if you're wearing a seat belt, your odds of dying on that road are next to none.
 
Displayed 95 of 95 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report