If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(AP)   In light of referees already failing eyesight, the NFL has decided not to use pink penalty flags and pink towels at the same time, again   (hosted.ap.org) divider line 70
    More: Obvious, NFL, yellow flag, penalty flags, pink penalty, pink towels, opinions  
•       •       •

870 clicks; posted to Sports » on 08 Oct 2013 at 10:38 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



70 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-10-08 09:33:35 AM  
I hate the pink flags, some of us are red green color blind and while on most fields it's not a problem, some of the shiatty fields it is.
 
2013-10-08 10:02:10 AM  
How about penalty flags just stay yellow forever, because that's what penalty flag color is?  The whole "think pink" marketing scheme is bad enough, but let's not muck up the actual flow of the game with it.
 
2013-10-08 10:17:33 AM  
Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.

/It is promoting breast cancer awareness, right?
//This would almost make watching Jaguars games bearable.
///Except that teams would commit multiple penalties on every play, but hey...who'd complain?
 
2013-10-08 10:30:27 AM  
I'd pay good money for an HDMI filter that would turn anything pepto-bismol colored into a nice shade of grey.
 
2013-10-08 10:40:56 AM  
If it gets Roger Goodell fired, I'm willing to believe and tell others that this means he is pro-breast cancer.
 
2013-10-08 10:44:41 AM  
And this is why you NEVER take suggestions from an 11-year-old, NFL.
 
2013-10-08 10:46:44 AM  
I kept thinking the penalty flags were challenge flags.
 
2013-10-08 10:47:10 AM  
Two in the pink, one in the Schaub.
 
2013-10-08 10:50:08 AM  
I think we're all well aware of breast cancer now. Time to start wearing brown to show support for colon cancer.

/no, that wasn't a Cleveland joke
//they're their own joke
 
2013-10-08 10:52:14 AM  
What's a good color for brain trauma?  Wouldn't that make more sense to memorialize?
 
2013-10-08 10:52:53 AM  

rjakobi: And this is why you NEVER take suggestions from an 11-year-old, NFL without thinking it all the way through

 
2013-10-08 10:53:33 AM  
there should have been an "anyone" in there somewhere
 
2013-10-08 10:54:55 AM  

Harv72b: Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.


Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.
 
2013-10-08 11:00:45 AM  

factoryconnection: How about penalty flags just stay yellow forever, because that's what penalty flag color is?


You- I like you. You can come to my home and watch a game. We see things the same way.
 
2013-10-08 11:02:50 AM  

swahnhennessy: I think we're all well aware of breast cancer now. Time to start wearing brown to show support for colon cancer.

/no, that wasn't a Cleveland joke
//they're their own joke


Did you know that September is prostate cancer awareness month?  The NFL apparently doesn't feel the need to an enormous production out of their charitable efforts in that area, because they've already got that demographic locked up.

All this pink BS is a farking sham.
 
2013-10-08 11:03:22 AM  

Snapper Carr: Harv72b: Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.


^ This.  Supporting the Susan B. Komen foundation is pretty much supporting the Susan G. Komen foundation, and not much else.  They like to keep most of the money they collect for themselves and their employees.
 
2013-10-08 11:15:19 AM  

Marcus Aurelius: Snapper Carr: Harv72b: Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

^ This.  Supporting the Susan B. Komen foundation is pretty much supporting the Susan G. Komen foundation, and not much else.  They like to keep most of the money they collect for themselves and their employees.


Is the NFL actually supporting the Komen foundation this year? Every mention of an organization I've seen watching NFL games has been to the American Cancer Society; I have yet to see or hear the Komen Foundation mentioned once during a game.
 
2013-10-08 11:15:48 AM  

Snapper Carr: Harv72b: Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.


They're actually partnered up with the ACS, although I'm not sure their funding into research is much better.  I think they do more with patient care though.
 
2013-10-08 11:16:23 AM  
I wish they would take the Old Yeller approach to these elderly refs and replace them with a whole new batch.
 
2013-10-08 11:16:42 AM  

Gonz: factoryconnection: How about penalty flags just stay yellow forever, because that's what penalty flag color is?

You- I like you. You can come to my home and watch a game. We see things the same way.


How about they go back to white?

"NFL penalty flags were colored white until 1965, when the color was changed to yellow "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_flag">http://en.wikipedia.org/w iki/Penalty_flag
 
2013-10-08 11:18:34 AM  

Marcus Aurelius: I'd pay good money for an HDMI filter that would turn anything pepto-bismol colored into a nice shade of grey.


Bonus: When the Raiders play, anyone watching the screen could safely assume the team color is a sassy shade of pink!
 
2013-10-08 11:24:35 AM  
I was wondering if the (unwashed) pink tops that the Falcons cheerleaders were wearing last night were going to be auctioned off.
 
2013-10-08 11:24:57 AM  
But....but...that stupid little kid wrote Roger Goodell a letter, and the ginger hammer turned it into a feel-good puff piece.  Those flags cure breast cancer, y'all.  THOSE FLAGS CURE BREAST CANCER!!


I, for one, think the pink penalty flags should stick around forever.
 
2013-10-08 11:34:10 AM  
Snapper Carr:

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.
 
2013-10-08 11:48:29 AM  
I hate the pink NFL month.

I could deal with one week.  But the whole month is just effing annoying.  Especially as some guys phase out the pink but some guys continue it.
 
2013-10-08 11:54:44 AM  
Man you guys really got upset about the pink.

Personally I barely noticed the flags. But I was paying attention to the games and not looking for something to be outraged at Goodell for, so that might explain it.

/corporations often promote charities both for publicity and maybe, just maybe, even if just a little bit, because it's a decent thing to do, Ric Romero will have more at 11
//this is, apparently, an outrage
 
2013-10-08 11:54:44 AM  

my_cats_breath_smells_like_cat_food: Marcus Aurelius: I'd pay good money for an HDMI filter that would turn anything pepto-bismol colored into a nice shade of grey.

Bonus: When the Raiders play, anyone watching the screen could safely assume the team color is a sassy shade of pink!


Wow.  I hadn't thought of that.
 
2013-10-08 11:56:20 AM  

keypusher: What's a good color for brain trauma?  Wouldn't that make more sense to memorialize?


This
 
2013-10-08 12:06:58 PM  

js34603: Man you guys really got upset about the pink.

Personally I barely noticed the flags. But I was paying attention to the games and not looking for something to be outraged at Goodell for, so that might explain it.

/corporations often promote charities both for publicity and maybe, just maybe, even if just a little bit, because it's a decent thing to do, Ric Romero will have more at 11
//this is, apparently, an outrage


some of us do see flags and understand what we see, having pink towels on the field with pink flags was a mistake.
 
2013-10-08 12:08:42 PM  

Yanks_RSJ: swahnhennessy: I think we're all well aware of breast cancer now. Time to start wearing brown to show support for colon cancer.

/no, that wasn't a Cleveland joke
//they're their own joke

Did you know that September is prostate cancer awareness month?  The NFL apparently doesn't feel the need to an enormous production out of their charitable efforts in that area, because they've already got that demographic locked up.


Not so, the NFL actually does a lot of marketing regarding prostate checks:
www.blogcdn.com
 
2013-10-08 12:20:55 PM  

js34603: Man you guys really got upset about the pink.

Personally I barely noticed the flags. But I was paying attention to the games and not looking for something to be outraged at Goodell for, so that might explain it.

/corporations often promote charities both for publicity and maybe, just maybe, even if just a little bit, because it's a decent thing to do, Ric Romero will have more at 11
//this is, apparently, an outrage


It IS an outrage because the NFL spends a ton more money promoting pink month than actually giving to charity
 
2013-10-08 12:21:25 PM  
The NFL's breast cancer awareness campaign is a sham last I looked.  The foundations typically get 5-10% of the actual revenue.  All they are trying to do is sell pink merchandise because if you make something pink, women like it!  Or something.

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/62332742/
 
2013-10-08 12:23:43 PM  

iggyskuz: Gonz: factoryconnection: How about penalty flags just stay yellow forever, because that's what penalty flag color is?

You- I like you. You can come to my home and watch a game. We see things the same way.

How about they go back to white?

"NFL penalty flags were colored white until 1965, when the color was changed to yellow "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_flag">http://en.wikipedia.org/w iki/Penalty_flag


"White flag" is too often associated with surrender nowadays.  NFL would never switch back.

Now if they switched to a Black Flag, that would be awesome.
 
2013-10-08 12:31:48 PM  
I siad it to friends of mine but I'd rather teams played one home game during October wearing pink alternate jerseys.  Don't spread it out for a month.
 
2013-10-08 12:33:14 PM  

my_cats_breath_smells_like_cat_food: Marcus Aurelius: I'd pay good money for an HDMI filter that would turn anything pepto-bismol colored into a nice shade of grey.

Bonus: When the Raiders play, anyone watching the screen could safely assume the team color is a sassy shade of pink!


More then once, I've wondered when in the hell did the Raiders sign Bret (The Hitman) Hart.
 
2013-10-08 12:39:04 PM  

TwoBeersOneCan: The NFL's breast cancer awareness campaign is a sham last I looked.  The foundations typically get 5-10% of the actual revenue.  All they are trying to do is sell pink merchandise because if you make something pink, women like it!  Or something.

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/62332742/


At least the disease they're targeting is relatively easy to self-test and has outcomes that highly benefits from early detection.

At least the awareness increase is an overall plus regardless of how little or much the NFL actually donates.
 
2013-10-08 12:40:23 PM  

keypusher: What's a good color for brain trauma?  Wouldn't that make more sense to memorialize?


No different color flag.  Have them throw potatoes instead.
 
2013-10-08 12:45:04 PM  

iggyskuz: How about they go back to white?


Then you run into the towel thing, although white is still better than fuchsia.
 
2013-10-08 12:51:08 PM  

iggyskuz: How about they go back to white?

"NFL penalty flags were colored white until 1965, when the color was changed to yellow "


Presumably so they'd be easier to see on color television.
 
2013-10-08 12:57:54 PM  

js34603: Man you guys really got upset about the pink.

Personally I barely noticed the flags. But I was paying attention to the games and not looking for something to be outraged at Goodell for, so that might explain it


It was considerably more confusing in person than it probably was on TV.
 
2013-10-08 12:59:08 PM  

Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: Snapper Carr: Harv72b: Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

They're actually partnered up with the ACS, although I'm not sure their funding into research is much better.  I think they do more with patient care though.


The Komen foundation must have something to do with it, though; they've made it clear in their litigating position that they consider the color pink, the month of October and the word "cure" to be their intellectual property.
 
2013-10-08 01:01:09 PM  
Go back to yellow, trim with some pink and slap a ribbon on there, game over
 
2013-10-08 01:03:17 PM  

Theaetetus: Not so, the NFL actually does a lot of marketing regarding prostate checks:


"everything looks good here!"

watercoolersportsnetwork.com
 
2013-10-08 01:05:05 PM  

rcantley: Snapper Carr:

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.


I wonder how much the Susan G. Komen foundation pays the NFL for this.
 
2013-10-08 01:08:13 PM  

js34603: Man you guys really got upset about the pink.

Personally I barely noticed the flags. But I was paying attention to the games and not looking for something to be outraged at Goodell for, so that might explain it.

/corporations often promote charities both for publicity and maybe, just maybe, even if just a little bit, because it's a decent thing to do, Ric Romero will have more at 11
//this is, apparently, an outrage


Well if you had watched the games you would have noticed there were numerous times there was confusion because some lost a towel and people thought a flag had been thrown.  To the point the refs huddled up a couple times to see which one had thrown the flag to find out no one had.  It really didnt have anything to do with the color it was just a really bad idea to have matching towels and flags.
 
2013-10-08 01:12:44 PM  

derpy: rcantley: Snapper Carr:

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

I wonder how much the Susan G. Komen foundation pays the NFL for this.


Its actually the taxpayer fynding the NFL for this, as the games are treated as charitable donations.
 
2013-10-08 01:12:59 PM  

Deneb81: TwoBeersOneCan: The NFL's breast cancer awareness campaign is a sham last I looked.  The foundations typically get 5-10% of the actual revenue.  All they are trying to do is sell pink merchandise because if you make something pink, women like it!  Or something.

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/62332742/

At least the disease they're targeting is relatively easy to self-test and has outcomes that highly benefits from early detection.

At least the awareness increase is an overall plus regardless of how little or much the NFL actually donates.


Throwing a token sum of money at a problem and "raising awareness" is not necessarily beneficial. Well, it is to the NFL and its corporate partners.
 
2013-10-08 01:25:15 PM  

Yanks_RSJ: iggyskuz: How about they go back to white?

"NFL penalty flags were colored white until 1965, when the color was changed to yellow "

Presumably so they'd be easier to see on color television.


Not to mention games played in a snowstorm.
 
2013-10-08 01:27:45 PM  
And seriously, who the fark isn't aware of breast cancer by now
 
2013-10-08 01:29:28 PM  
They should have kept the referees' penalty flags the same color, and switched the coaches' challenge flags to pink, so signify what whiny little girls they are when they use them.
 
2013-10-08 01:30:33 PM  

LucklessWonder: And seriously, who the fark isn't aware of breast cancer by now


Every Cheerleader Shot this weekend enforced my awareness of BREAST(s) CANCER
 
2013-10-08 01:33:33 PM  
They're going back to the yellow flags for Penis Cancer Awareness.
 
2013-10-08 01:34:09 PM  
Good news, problem solved: http://news.yahoo.com/the-breast-cancer-shot--cleveland-doctor-develo p s-a-vaccine-113000843.html

We can go back to the non-pink uniforms.  Nice work folks.
 
2013-10-08 01:34:15 PM  

Super Chronic: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: Snapper Carr: Harv72b: Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

They're actually partnered up with the ACS, although I'm not sure their funding into research is much better.  I think they do more with patient care though.

The Komen foundation must have something to do with it, though; they've made it clear in their litigating position that they consider the color pink, the month of October and the word "cure" to be their intellectual property.


I know they've gone to extremes in trying to protect "for the sure," especially against some smaller organizations, but I'm not aware of the color pink or October thing.  At least according to their wiki page, that's where their litigation has been focused.
 
2013-10-08 01:48:05 PM  

buckeyebrain: Yanks_RSJ: iggyskuz: How about they go back to white?

"NFL penalty flags were colored white until 1965, when the color was changed to yellow "

Presumably so they'd be easier to see on color television.

Not to mention games played in a snowstorm.


Which has happened more than a few times.
 
2013-10-08 02:00:40 PM  

ElwoodCuse: Deneb81: TwoBeersOneCan: The NFL's breast cancer awareness campaign is a sham last I looked.  The foundations typically get 5-10% of the actual revenue.  All they are trying to do is sell pink merchandise because if you make something pink, women like it!  Or something.

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/62332742/

At least the disease they're targeting is relatively easy to self-test and has outcomes that highly benefits from early detection.

At least the awareness increase is an overall plus regardless of how little or much the NFL actually donates.

Throwing a token sum of money at a problem and "raising awareness" is not necessarily beneficial. Well, it is to the NFL and its corporate partners.


Except when awareness can actually positively affect patient outcomes.

I'm not saying the NFL is doing this out if the goodness of their heart. I'm saying regardless of WHY they're doing it, the awareness alone is a positive.

ESPECIALLY because for this specific medical condition awareness and self-testing has such a strong correlation to increased positive outcomes.
 
2013-10-08 02:13:49 PM  
Snapper Carr: Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

It is my understanding that they are one of the more credible charities around, with a four star rating from Charity Navigator, Link which is their highest rating.

Since the CEO of the Susan G Komen foundation, Nancy Brinker, came out a couple of years ago against Planned Parenthood, the liberal part of the news media has been on a mission to smear her and discredit her organization. But like FOX NEWS from the other side, they are long on accusations and woefully short on facts. If you could provide me some links to back up what you say, I would appreciate it. I am aware that as CEO she rakes in close to 700k a year, and as the head of a charity would have almost all of her expenses (she has champagne tastes and goes first class all the way) paid by them.
 
2013-10-08 03:21:28 PM  

LucklessWonder: And seriously, who the fark isn't aware of breast cancer by now


I wasn't. And then one time I saw the color pink, and I was like "oh yeah, breast cancer exists." So now I'm aware.

/true story, bro
 
2013-10-08 03:33:44 PM  

Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: Super Chronic: Joey Jo Jo Jr Shabadu: Snapper Carr: Harv72b: Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

They're actually partnered up with the ACS, although I'm not sure their funding into research is much better.  I think they do more with patient care though.

The Komen foundation must have something to do with it, though; they've made it clear in their litigating position that they consider the color pink, the month of October and the word "cure" to be their intellectual property.

I know they've gone to extremes in trying to protect "for the sure," especially against some smaller organizations, but I'm not aware of the color pink or October thing.  At least according to their wiki page, that's where their litigation has been focused.


I'm just waiting for them to sue this guy

upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-10-08 03:38:38 PM  

ariseatex: iggyskuz: Gonz: factoryconnection: How about penalty flags just stay yellow forever, because that's what penalty flag color is?

You- I like you. You can come to my home and watch a game. We see things the same way.

How about they go back to white?

"NFL penalty flags were colored white until 1965, when the color was changed to yellow "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penalty_flag">http://en.wikipedia.org/w iki/Penalty_flag

"White flag" is too often associated with surrender nowadays.  NFL would never switch back.

Now if they switched to a Black Flag, that would be awesome.


Well, the NFL does want you to buy a Six Pack and have a TV Party. Maybe that would help the league Rise Above... at least until the owners started saying Gimme Gimme Gimme. But even then, fans of certain teams would be Thirsty and Miserable, living a Life of Pain.

//I'll quit now. No More.
 
2013-10-08 04:11:20 PM  
Anyone else see the commercial about the woman who said she checked herself after watching a Jets game and think "The Jets were so bad they gave her cancer"?
 
2013-10-08 04:40:49 PM  

SuperChuck: Anyone else see the commercial about the woman who said she checked herself after watching a Jets game and think "The Jets were so bad they gave her cancer"?


I feel like lung cancer or melanoma might be bigger issues for Jets fans.
 
2013-10-08 09:11:26 PM  

ElwoodCuse: Deneb81: TwoBeersOneCan: The NFL's breast cancer awareness campaign is a sham last I looked.  The foundations typically get 5-10% of the actual revenue.  All they are trying to do is sell pink merchandise because if you make something pink, women like it!  Or something.

http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/62332742/

At least the disease they're targeting is relatively easy to self-test and has outcomes that highly benefits from early detection.

At least the awareness increase is an overall plus regardless of how little or much the NFL actually donates.

Throwing a token sum of money at a problem and "raising awareness" is not necessarily beneficial. Well, it is to the NFL and its corporate partners.


I'm sure there are causes that would really benefit from "raised awareness", but breast cancer is not one of them. Breast cancer does not need "awareness"; people are already aware of breast cancer. What it needs is "raised money".
 
2013-10-08 09:30:48 PM  

varmitydog: Snapper Carr: Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

It is my understanding that they are one of the more credible charities around, with a four star rating from Charity Navigator, Link which is their highest rating.

Since the CEO of the Susan G Komen foundation, Nancy Brinker, came out a couple of years ago against Planned Parenthood, the liberal part of the news media has been on a mission to smear her and discredit her organization. But like FOX NEWS from the other side, they are long on accusations and woefully short on facts. If you could provide me some links to back up what you say, I would appreciate it. I am aware that as CEO she rakes in close to 700k a year, and as the head of a charity would have almost all of her expenses (she has champagne tastes and goes first class all the way) paid by them.


The Komen Foundation's shortcomings are numerous, well-known and documented.  Only one of these issues - Brinker's shenanigans - are political in nature and you're the one that's bringing it up and tacking on rhetoric about liberal media.

The tabs across the top of the page are well-labeled; I suggest you move over a couple of notches to "Politics" and take your rhetoric there.

In other words, don't bring your shiat into the Sports Tab and ruin the one last nice part of Fark.
 
2013-10-08 10:17:02 PM  
UNC_Samurai: The Komen Foundation's shortcomings are numerous, well-known and documented. Only one of these issues - Brinker's shenanigans - are political in nature and you're the one that's bringing it up and tacking on rhetoric about liberal media.

It doesn't appear that way to me. The way it looks to me is that Brinker decided to get political by refusing to support planned parenthood because of her pro life views and the pro choice people went into political combat mode and caused all these "shortcomings". She is a political novice and the pro choice people have a lifetime of experience at making folks look bad by dirty tricks. This is a woman who was basically a cancer crusader VOLUNTEER for decades, built this organization from the ground up and has followed every ethical safeguard her entire career. And then all of the sudden she's this supposed criminal--right after she messes with the pro abortion people. Yeah, right. For example, the 15% to research labs (cited several times above) was 30% for years until the pro choice people started their smear campaign against it, then with the reduced funding the foundation decided to keep supporting screening instead of funding the research labs. But it makes a great soundbite to leave the rest of the story out of it, and go with "only 15%! The biatch is a criminal".

The tabs across the top of the page are well-labeled; I suggest you move over a couple of notches to "Politics" and take your rhetoric there. In other words, don't bring your shiat into the Sports Tab and ruin the one last nice part of Fark.

Goodness gracious, you want to banish me to the politics tab just for asking questions? Did you take a job with homeland security or something?
 
2013-10-08 11:10:41 PM  

johnny_vegas: Theaetetus: Not so, the NFL actually does a lot of marketing regarding prostate checks:

"everything looks good here!"

[watercoolersportsnetwork.com image 610x487]


Oh fark, that buttfumble is going to provide comedy for longer than I will be alive.
 
2013-10-09 04:05:19 AM  

skinink: They're going back to the yellow flags for Penis Cancer Awareness.


They should throw dildos instead of flags.
 
2013-10-09 05:35:53 AM  
Good. Now get rid of the rest of the campaign. The league forces a bunch of professional gladiators to wear the gayest looking outfits in the history of sports in order to help raise awareness for breast cancer? Seriously? Awareness? It is literally true that there is not a single person older than fifteen in this country that isn't aware that breast cancer is a thing. Pink clashes with all 32 team uniforms. It looks bad enough even with Seattle, who already has bright teal. Seeing pink on the Cleveland drab brown made me want to vomit.
 
2013-10-09 08:27:41 AM  

Marcus Aurelius: I'd pay good money for an HDMI filter that would turn anything pepto-bismol colored into a nice shade of grey.


And that's how zombie porn is made.
 
2013-10-09 01:37:39 PM  

Marcus Aurelius: Snapper Carr: Harv72b: Better option: replace all referees with buxom young women wearing yellow bikini tops, and...well, you get the idea.

Best idea: Ditch the Susan G. Komen foundation and partner up with an organization that spends more than 15% of its donations on research.

^ This.  Supporting the Susan B. Komen foundation is pretty much supporting the Susan G. Komen foundation, and not much else.  They like to keep most of the money they collect for themselves and their employees.


There's this thing that was invented about 15 years ago called "google".  On it, you could actually look up these things called "facts" which would show that what you're saying is actually completely wrong.

Charity Navigator:  http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=45 0 9#.UlWTG1DbP2c - rated 4 stars of possible 4, spends only 6.5% of its revenue on administrative expenses (i.e., money for "themselves and their employees").  More than 80% of the money they collect goes to funding actual programs.
 
Displayed 70 of 70 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report