bhcompy: karmachameleon: For the longest time, I thought that they could hardly have done worse. Then 1999 and The Phantom Menace rolled around, and boy was I wrong.It wasn't a bad movie. It actually had plenty of good moments. It just wasn't a very good movie. Could hardly have done worse would seem a bit hyperbolic, even without the prequels to compare them to
peterthx: American Decency Association:That first shot is nothing but a beautiful f*cking set.Beautiful f*cking sets are a dying race.I have nothing inherently against green screen. Sci-fi especially would be very hard without digital effects, but the ease with which something is done cheapens the final product.What's the difference though if the audience can't tell?Sets are made of wood or paint on glass or pixels. If they look real it's good enough.
karmachameleon: You're right. Too bad most of the digital sets used in the prequels don't look real.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Apr 28 2017 17:40:58
Runtime: 0.187 sec (186 ms)