If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Think Progress)   Rep. Darrel Issa, in his quest for the absolute truth about Benghazi, may have sorta kinda possibly slightly accidentally forgot to invite the Democrats on the Oversight to join him on his fact-finding trip to Libya   (thinkprogress.org) divider line 499
    More: Asinine, Benghazi, Democrats, Libya, house oversight committee, truth, Elijah Cummings  
•       •       •

3682 clicks; posted to Politics » on 21 Sep 2013 at 2:31 PM (30 weeks ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



499 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-09-21 11:28:44 AM
It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.
 
2013-09-21 11:37:39 AM
How much money you wasting on this bullsh*t, Issa?

/you worthless crooked POS
 
2013-09-21 11:46:48 AM
GOP funded I'm sure.
 
2013-09-21 11:47:06 AM
Christ, what an asshole.
 
2013-09-21 11:50:45 AM
Arsonist says what?
 
2013-09-21 11:55:20 AM
It was the video, THE VIDEO!  How many times do you need to be told?
 
2013-09-21 11:56:58 AM
While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.
 
2013-09-21 12:01:37 PM

MaudlinMutantMollusk: How much money you wasting on this bullsh*t, Issa?

/you worthless crooked POS


I heard it's costing the taxpayers $200 million a day.
 
2013-09-21 12:13:28 PM
The second biggest mistake Republicans made vis-a-vis Benghazi is putting that douchetard in charge of the investigation.

/the first is thinking there was a scandal
 
2013-09-21 12:13:49 PM
Well, of course! Those America-haters would want facts, not "Freedom Facts" like the assurance Obama personally oversaw the attacks to destroy the bulletin board in the consulate's Rumpus Room showing how Osama, Ghadafi AND Saddam finished atop him in the foosball tournament!
 
2013-09-21 12:59:45 PM

Benevolent Misanthrope: While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.


I didn't know you could do this, but I heard he took a large fire insurance policy out on Rome just a few weeks ago. Must be a coincidence.
 
2013-09-21 01:02:21 PM

The Briny Derp: Christ, what an asshole.


No, Rep. Issa just wants to make sure the Democrats stay safe back in DC.  It's actually very thoughtful of him.

...

I typed all that with a straight face.
 
2013-09-21 01:26:31 PM

Benevolent Misanthrope: While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.


Just stay the hell out of Naples.
 
2013-09-21 01:27:14 PM
What are the odds he finds any actual facts?
 
2013-09-21 01:44:26 PM

SilentStrider: What are the odds he finds any actual facts?


I'd wager it's about as likely as me voluntarily eating a Chicago-style pizza.

/New Yorker
//Brooklynite
 
2013-09-21 01:55:20 PM
So Obama "murdered" the ambassador  how again?
 
2013-09-21 02:11:44 PM

themindiswatching: So Obama "murdered" the ambassador  how again?


Because he failed to authorize the use of warp-speed jets to fly to the area of attack and drop those super-smart bombs that only kill bad guys.  Study it out.
 
2013-09-21 02:11:48 PM
Let me get this straight: Obama was willing to abandon Stevens and some SEALs to die, but yet Issa thinks he's safe to go to Libya on a fact-finding trip?
 
2013-09-21 02:11:55 PM
Issa in Libya
Shaka when the walls fell
 
2013-09-21 02:34:10 PM
I imagine Issa at home, watching TV, cable goes out, he screams, "Damnit, BENGHAZI!"

Seriously, check his Twitter feed. It's 90% Benghazi. His single focus on this is... interesting.
 
2013-09-21 02:36:00 PM

King Something: SilentStrider: What are the odds he finds any actual facts?

I'd wager it's about as likely as me voluntarily eating a Chicago-style pizza.

/New Yorker
//Brooklynite


More for me!!!

img834.imageshack.us

/all pizza is good pizza
//currently eating pizza
 
2013-09-21 02:38:25 PM
Blame the White House for their refusal to admit that mistakes were made.
 
2013-09-21 02:38:35 PM
It's not like he's interested in finding 'Facts', and The Med is very nice at this time of year.
 
2013-09-21 02:40:18 PM

WI241TH: Benevolent Misanthrope: While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.

I didn't know you could do this, but I heard he took a large fire insurance policy out on Rome just a few weeks ago. Must be a coincidence.


The streets of Rome are all covered in rubble.
 
2013-09-21 02:41:50 PM
The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.
 
2013-09-21 02:44:32 PM
img855.imageshack.us
 
2013-09-21 02:46:22 PM
The definition of true, ultimate karma is Darrell Issa being trapped in a stolen, burning car that uses one of his old Viper alarms. And as the flames get hotter and hotter, the car alarm activates and says "Please die in this car fire" in his voice..... over and over and over again.
 
2013-09-21 02:46:42 PM
be careful everybody, clicking a think progress link can give you super aids
 
2013-09-21 02:48:53 PM

Rann Xerox: The definition of true, ultimate karma is Darrell Issa being trapped in a stolen, burning car that uses one of his old Viper alarms. And as the flames get hotter and hotter, the car alarm activates and says "Please die in this car fire" in his voice..... over and over and over again.


Please die in a fire
 
2013-09-21 02:49:08 PM

Ricardo Klement: Let me get this straight: Obama was willing to abandon Stevens and some SEALs to die, but yet Issa thinks he's safe to go to Libya on a fact-finding trip?


i1.ytimg.com

Good luck.
 
2013-09-21 02:49:24 PM

netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.



Sure, okay.
 
2013-09-21 02:50:33 PM

Lionel Mandrake: themindiswatching: So Obama "murdered" the ambassador  how again?

Because he failed to authorize the use of warp-speed jets to fly to the area of attack and drop those super-smart bombs that only kill bad guys.  Study it out.


No, it's because Obama used an untraceable encrypted subspace wormhole vortex communicator to retroactively issue a stand down order that left our people to die.
 
2013-09-21 02:55:22 PM
Even for a politician that is one shady motherfncker.
 
2013-09-21 03:02:25 PM
The Benghazi truth movement is at least as retarded as the 9/11 truth movement.

Discuss.
 
2013-09-21 03:04:18 PM

SilentStrider: What are the odds he finds any actual facts?


1:Potato
 
2013-09-21 03:06:01 PM
As Cumming notes, this isn't even the first time they have done this.  Despite specifically stating that all oversea trips must be bipartisan Issa sent only Repubs over to Libya on a 'fact-finding' mission but concealed the reasoning and did not include any Democrats last October.

I guess we can't complain.  Everyone wanted transparency in government, and this is as transparent a partisan witch hunt as I've ever seen.
 
2013-09-21 03:06:26 PM

netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.


You need to try harder.
 
2013-09-21 03:12:10 PM

Hastor: As Cumming notes, this isn't even the first time they have done this.  Despite specifically stating that all oversea trips must be bipartisan Issa sent only Repubs over to Libya on a 'fact-finding' mission but concealed the reasoning and did not include any Democrats last October.

I guess we can't complain.  Everyone wanted transparency in government, and this is as transparent a partisan witch hunt as I've ever seen.


I've honest to god never seen anything like it. It's not like PlameGate, where not only was there some 'There' there, it was much higher up than anybody thought, or even Iran Contra where Bill Casey had the good sense to die and take the fall.

This is literally a bunch of nothing.
 
2013-09-21 03:13:12 PM

Mentat: Lionel Mandrake: themindiswatching: So Obama "murdered" the ambassador  how again?

Because he failed to authorize the use of warp-speed jets to fly to the area of attack and drop those super-smart bombs that only kill bad guys.  Study it out.

No, it's because Obama used an untraceable encrypted subspace wormhole vortex communicator to retroactively issue a stand down order that left our people to die.


What's even more disgusting is that the first time Benghazi happened, everybody lived. It was only after that that he decided to rip a whole in the space timecube continuum in order to accidentally four brave patriots.
 
2013-09-21 03:19:59 PM
Inviting democrats to this match might allow them to catch Issa improving his lie.

i90.photobucket.com
 
2013-09-21 03:22:13 PM
How much of my money is going to this crap exactly?
 
2013-09-21 03:22:41 PM

freak7: Blame the White House for their refusal to admit that mistakes were made.


Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:
www.writebynight.net
 
2013-09-21 03:26:08 PM
To think:

If Romney wasn't such a disaster in foreign policy and royally bungled his handling of Benghazi, then the GOP wouldn't have to keep this phony controversy going by trying to make Obama look bad compared to Romney when it comes to foreign policy.

Now it just sounds like sour grapes.
 
2013-09-21 03:26:43 PM
WASHINGTON, DC - The first anniversary of the Benghazi tragedy was supposed to be the time for conservatives around the country to descend on the Capitol by the thousands, demanding that Congress reveal the truth. Less than one hundred bothered to show up.

that's from the linked article. issa and Special Operation Speaks haven't been able to garner support for their indignity and SOS attacks on boehner.

but while issa wastes money on his trip the house can strip 40 BILLION from food stamps.

still wonder why after 42 years of being a republican i stopped.

/actually i stopped in 2004 after bush screwed the pooch on afghanistan and iraq. then came 2008 and the republicans went from bad to god awful.
 
2013-09-21 03:27:07 PM

keylock71: freak7: Blame the White House for their refusal to admit that mistakes were made.

Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:
[www.writebynight.net image 163x236]



That is a terrible comparison.

Kids sometimes have legitimate reasons for being upset.
 
2013-09-21 03:27:43 PM

netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.


Sorry, I'm just not feeling it.

It's pretty apparent at this point that the "scandal" of Benghazi resides solely in the GOP's blatant desperate attempts to politicize a tragedy, to try to score cheap political points off the corpses of the dead.

Look. I know trying to defend the GOP's asshattery on a daily basis has to wearing on you but really do try try to have some standards.
 
2013-09-21 03:28:42 PM

SilentStrider: What are the odds he finds any actual facts?


I'm sure it will work out as well as those fact-finding trips to Kenya to find Obama's real birth certificate.
 
2013-09-21 03:30:58 PM
Remind me why Darrell Issa keeps getting re-elected?

Oh right, I forgot it's because you decided to vote for him because Obama isn't doing enough/too much/muh freedoms. Silly me.
 
2013-09-21 03:31:03 PM

King Something: SilentStrider: What are the odds he finds any actual facts?

I'd wager it's about as likely as me voluntarily eating a Chicago-style pizza.

/New Yorker
//Brooklynite


Well, Chicago style IS better
 
2013-09-21 03:34:37 PM

whidbey: Remind me why Darrell Issa keeps getting re-elected?


His district is a pretty bullet-proof one with some of the most conservative areas in Orange and San Diego County.
 
2013-09-21 03:36:55 PM
Darrell Issa is a perpetrator of fraud and dishonest to his core.

He should be imprisoned and sent to a gulag for his crimes against the state.
 
2013-09-21 03:42:26 PM
Hey, anyone remember when Issa slammed Bush for condemning Nancy Pelosi's trip to Syria...while he was in Syria with her?

I miss that Darrell Issa.
 
2013-09-21 03:42:31 PM

Rann Xerox: The definition of true, ultimate karma is Darrell Issa being trapped in a stolen, burning car that uses one of his old Viper alarms. And as the flames get hotter and hotter, the car alarm activates and says "Please die in this car fire" in his voice..... over and over and over again.


Holy shiat, how did I not know this? As if I needed a reason to think less of the clown.
 
2013-09-21 03:49:16 PM

whidbey: Remind me why Darrell Issa keeps getting re-elected?

Oh right, I forgot it's because you decided to vote for him because Obama isn't doing enough/too much/muh freedoms. Silly me.


Obama is doing quite a bit to my freedoms.  Continuing the work Bush did to limit them.
 
2013-09-21 03:54:09 PM

Dinki: It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.


Keeping it classy.
 
2013-09-21 03:54:18 PM

bigsteve3OOO: whidbey: Remind me why Darrell Issa keeps getting re-elected?

Oh right, I forgot it's because you decided to vote for him because Obama isn't doing enough/too much/muh freedoms. Silly me.

Obama is doing quite a bit to my freedoms.  Continuing the work Bush did to limit them.


So why aren't you biatching to congress to change the laws?

I guess it's probably because you don't know how government works and somebody on the radio told you that the executive branch workin within the limits or the law as written by Congress is actually the Presidents fault.
 
2013-09-21 04:00:48 PM
I've had farts more important than what happened in Benghazi.
 
2013-09-21 04:02:57 PM
I am ashamed that this man is my Rep. I didn't vote for him, of course.
 
2013-09-21 04:07:25 PM

LarryDan43: I've had farts more important than what happened in Benghazi.


More people have died from me masturbating then died at Bengahzi.
 
2013-09-21 04:10:10 PM

Satanic_Hamster: LarryDan43: I've had farts more important than what happened in Benghazi.

More people have died from me masturbating then died at Bengahzi.


People or kittens?
 
2013-09-21 04:11:09 PM
Oh, this shiat again?

i28.photobucket.com
 
2013-09-21 04:14:55 PM

JonBuck: I am ashamed that this man is my Rep. I didn't vote for him, of course.


You're only 16 - you don't have a rep yet!

/sorry
 
2013-09-21 04:16:50 PM
images3.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2013-09-21 04:19:00 PM

max_pooper: Satanic_Hamster: LarryDan43: I've had farts more important than what happened in Benghazi.

More people have died from me masturbating then died at Bengahzi.

People or kittens?


People.
 
2013-09-21 04:20:57 PM

Satanic_Hamster: max_pooper: Satanic_Hamster: LarryDan43: I've had farts more important than what happened in Benghazi.

More people have died from me masturbating then died at Bengahzi.

People or kittens?

People.


That is some furious masturbation.
 
2013-09-21 04:22:13 PM
www.doletown.com
 
2013-09-21 04:23:12 PM
So he's going on a Benghazi fact finding junket to Egypt and Italy? Why doesn't he fly to the Cayman Islands and visit his money? It makes about as much sense.
 
2013-09-21 04:27:58 PM

max_pooper: That is some furious masturbation.


I'm named my technique "Furious Two Fisted Monkey Style."
 
2013-09-21 04:30:15 PM
fun fact about the "exhaustive" benghazi ARB: state dept did not transcribe the interviews that were conducted. also, despite the fact that the house oversight committee has issued a subpoena demanding them, the state dept is not making the summaries of those interviews available. weird...
 
2013-09-21 04:33:49 PM

xanadian: The Briny Derp: Christ, what an asshole.

No, Rep. Issa just wants to make sure the Democrats stay safe back in DC.  It's actually very thoughtful of him.

...

I typed all that with a straight face.


Sooo.  You had extensive oral surgery earlier today?  Fell face-first on a pillow made of botox syringes?
In other words, I know you at least 'snerted' before you started typing.
 
2013-09-21 04:34:40 PM

netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.


You mean the part of the testimony where 15 of 17 Democrats bailed? That part?
 
2013-09-21 04:34:54 PM
Republicans putting your tax dollars to work.
 
2013-09-21 04:37:52 PM

the_dude_abides: fun fact about the "exhaustive" benghazi ARB: state dept did not transcribe the interviews that were conducted. also, despite the fact that the house oversight committee has issued a subpoena demanding them, the state dept is not making the summaries of those interviews available. weird...


Yeah, weird.  Especially weird that anyone can google it and bang, there they are.
 
2013-09-21 04:38:45 PM

Satanic_Hamster: max_pooper: Satanic_Hamster: LarryDan43: I've had farts more important than what happened in Benghazi.

More people have died from me masturbating then died at Bengahzi.

People or kittens?

People.


fc03.deviantart.net
 
2013-09-21 04:39:26 PM
Is this beating a dead horse or beating off to a dead horse?
 
2013-09-21 04:40:16 PM
Anyone catch former Ambassador Pickering & Gen. Mullen (House Oversight 9/19):   http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/315067-1
(nothing but chickens have died in vain)...

Remember, Issa wanted these two to testify in closed session (for obvious reasons) during the ht. of the derp several months ago.  The Repubs made sure to wave the bloody flag - in the form of the family members - to keep THIS hearing from catching much press.

Insofar as Issa doing anything possible to keep his distance from Ranking Member E. Cummings?  Libya is probably as far away as he can get.
Best part of House Oversight Hearings is watching Cummings twist Issa's stem
 
2013-09-21 04:40:39 PM

YoungLochinvar: netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.

You mean the part of the testimony where 15 of 17 Democrats bailed? That part?


This part?

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/09/20/these-pictures-prove-fox-is-l y ing-democrats-did/196000
 
2013-09-21 04:40:56 PM

thamike: Yeah, weird.  Especially weird that anyone can google it and bang, there they are.


link?
 
2013-09-21 04:44:20 PM
3 THINGS.1. What possible information could he possibly be getting over a YEAR after the event, that he couldn't get over the phone or via written reports / pictures.2. How much will he be given PER DAY as part of his food budget.3. How much is his trip + Security going to cost the US taxpayer?
 
2013-09-21 04:45:37 PM

keylock71: Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:


LOL you're incapable of admitting that the Obama administration made any mistakes related to Benghazi.
 
2013-09-21 04:46:22 PM

Heliovdrake: 3 THINGS.1. What possible information could he possibly be getting over a YEAR after the event, that he couldn't get over the phone or via written reports / pictures.2. How much will he be given PER DAY as part of his food budget.3. How much is his trip + Security going to cost the US taxpayer?


Oh ipad formating, how you troll me.

3 THINGS.

1. What possible information could he possibly be getting over a YEAR after the event, that he couldn't get over the phone or via written reports / pictures.

2. How much will he be given PER DAY as part of his food budget.

3. How much is his trip + Security going to cost the US taxpayer?

 
2013-09-21 04:47:03 PM

Joesama: This part?

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/09/20/these-pictures-prove-fox-is-l y ing-democrats-did/196000


i love how even in that article, it says "yes, these guys had to leave, but there was no walk out", typical word games from dishonest democrat shills

also, it's cute that you're citing media matters as a legit source
 
2013-09-21 04:48:02 PM

thamike: the_dude_abides: fun fact about the "exhaustive" benghazi ARB: state dept did not transcribe the interviews that were conducted. also, despite the fact that the house oversight committee has issued a subpoena demanding them, the state dept is not making the summaries of those interviews available. weird...

Yeah, weird.  Especially weird that anyone can google it and bang, there they are.


You just lost.  See, you thought you would be able to convince the troll to enlighten himself.  Now you just gave him another opportunity to say "prove it, I'm a lazy good-for-nothing information moocher."
 
2013-09-21 04:48:02 PM
I was watching the footage of the hearing from this week earlier today on CSPAN. Admiral Mike Mullen answered absolutely every question that has arisen. The GOP members of the committee were willfully ignoring everything he said. I guess Admiral Mullen is just another member of the vast Left Wing conspiracy that's out to destroy this country. Although I'm not really surprised, the US Naval Academy has always been an institution with a radical Leftist agenda.

/Seriously though. F$%K all of the Republicans in that hearing. To the man, they were badgering witnesses, putting words into the mouths of the witnesses, and asking leading questions that they would only accept a "yes" or "no" answer to , with the intent of getting a misleading answer. It was revolting to watch them use that hearing for very partisan, very obvious political reasons, while the families of some of the people who died were sitting right there. They are damaging US security and overall foreign policy and anyone voting for them (particularly that scumbag John Mica) is a fool.
 
2013-09-21 04:48:47 PM

freak7: keylock71: Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:

LOL you're incapable of admitting that the Obama administration made any mistakes related to Benghazi.


Oh this will be good.

Exactly what mistakes were made.
Show your work.
 
2013-09-21 04:48:48 PM

Joesama: YoungLochinvar: netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.

You mean the part of the testimony where 15 of 17 Democrats bailed? That part?

This part?

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/09/20/these-pictures-prove-fox-is-l y ing-democrats-did/196000


I'm sure Fox & Friends will lead with a correction Monday.
 
2013-09-21 04:50:06 PM

Heliovdrake: freak7: keylock71: Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:

LOL you're incapable of admitting that the Obama administration made any mistakes related to Benghazi.

Oh this will be good.

Exactly what mistakes were made.
Show your work.


Duh, 0bama said "acts of terror" and not "a terrorist attack."  Therefore, and such as.
 
2013-09-21 04:51:10 PM

sugardave: You just lost.  See, you thought you would be able to convince the troll to enlighten himself.  Now you just gave him another opportunity to say "prove it, I'm a lazy good-for-nothing information moocher."


maybe you can send a link to the interview transcripts then, i asked mike and he's strangely silent
 
2013-09-21 04:51:27 PM

Heliovdrake: freak7: keylock71: Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:

LOL you're incapable of admitting that the Obama administration made any mistakes related to Benghazi.

Oh this will be good.

Exactly what mistakes were made.
Show your work.


www.bitlogic.com
 
2013-09-21 04:55:21 PM

vygramul: Heliovdrake: freak7: keylock71: Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:

LOL you're incapable of admitting that the Obama administration made any mistakes related to Benghazi.

Oh this will be good.

Exactly what mistakes were made.
Show your work.

[www.bitlogic.com image 536x600]


someonegottoldohsnap.jpg
 
2013-09-21 04:55:39 PM

NINDroog: I was watching the footage of the hearing from this week earlier today on CSPAN. Admiral Mike Mullen answered absolutely every question that has arisen. The GOP members of the committee were willfully ignoring everything he said. I guess Admiral Mullen is just another member of the vast Left Wing conspiracy that's out to destroy this country. Although I'm not really surprised, the US Naval Academy has always been an institution with a radical Leftist agenda.

/Seriously though. F$%K all of the Republicans in that hearing. To the man, they were badgering witnesses, putting words into the mouths of the witnesses, and asking leading questions that they would only accept a "yes" or "no" answer to , with the intent of getting a misleading answer. It was revolting to watch them use that hearing for very partisan, very obvious political reasons, while the families of some of the people who died were sitting right there. They are damaging US security and overall foreign policy and anyone voting for them (particularly that scumbag John Mica) is a fool.


Watched the entire hearing - after Issa did his best to keep the Admiral & Ambassador under wraps earlier this year - I figured it would be worth it to listen to the whole thing running in the background - Noting to see here except derp & disrespect directed at the witnesses

/need a report on the total amount spent on this circus, from the GAO, take it out of these clown's salaries - I'd rather feed itinerant, illegal feral hogs with my taxes than be `entertained' by this shiat
 
2013-09-21 04:56:13 PM

YoungLochinvar: netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.

You mean the part of the testimony where 15 of 17 Democrats bailed? That part?


What additional information can be gained from people who were not there and do not know what happened?
 
2013-09-21 04:58:43 PM

sugardave: netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.

You need to try harder.


Funny, I have him labeled as "trying too hard".
 
2013-09-21 04:59:22 PM

the_dude_abides: sugardave: You just lost.  See, you thought you would be able to convince the troll to enlighten himself.  Now you just gave him another opportunity to say "prove it, I'm a lazy good-for-nothing information moocher."

maybe you can send a link to the interview transcripts then, i asked mike and he's strangely silent


Maybe you could, you know, stop asking people to do research for you?  I doubt it, though.
 
2013-09-21 04:59:44 PM

vygramul: [www.bitlogic.com image 536x600]


lol this is the most debunked pile of shiat ever, that report says AQ's gonna attack the US in the broadest terms possible, there's nothing specific or actionable in there. what could have been done at that point that would have possibly prevented the hijackings that happened on 9/11? a general alert? there was no precedent for those attacks because nobody expected THAT scenario. it's the worst kind of monday morning quarterbacking to suggest otherwise.
 
2013-09-21 05:03:13 PM

the_dude_abides: vygramul: [www.bitlogic.com image 536x600]

lol this is the most debunked pile of shiat ever, that report says AQ's gonna attack the US in the broadest terms possible, there's nothing specific or actionable in there. what could have been done at that point that would have possibly prevented the hijackings that happened on 9/11? a general alert? there was no precedent for those attacks because nobody expected THAT scenario. it's the worst kind of monday morning quarterbacking to suggest otherwise.


It's a fake I made based on this:

i.cdn.turner.com
 
2013-09-21 05:04:48 PM

vygramul: [i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]


well that's embarrassing... my bad
 
2013-09-21 05:05:09 PM

vygramul: the_dude_abides: vygramul: [www.bitlogic.com image 536x600]

lol this is the most debunked pile of shiat ever, that report says AQ's gonna attack the US in the broadest terms possible, there's nothing specific or actionable in there. what could have been done at that point that would have possibly prevented the hijackings that happened on 9/11? a general alert? there was no precedent for those attacks because nobody expected THAT scenario. it's the worst kind of monday morning quarterbacking to suggest otherwise.

It's a fake I made based on this:

[i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]


That would explain why I couldn't find anything about it.
 
2013-09-21 05:06:59 PM

the_dude_abides: vygramul: [i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]

well that's embarrassing... my bad


Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.
 
2013-09-21 05:07:09 PM
The Obama administration won't even admit to erroneously blaming the attack on an internet video or that when they initially briefed the country, that they were withholding known facts, but hey, they're totally telling the truth about everything else.
 
2013-09-21 05:08:35 PM

Aristocles: vygramul: Heliovdrake: freak7: keylock71: Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:

LOL you're incapable of admitting that the Obama administration made any mistakes related to Benghazi.

Oh this will be good.

Exactly what mistakes were made.
Show your work.

[www.bitlogic.com image 536x600]

someonegottoldohsnap.jpg


Yeah they did! Wait, what?
 
2013-09-21 05:08:50 PM

vygramul: the_dude_abides: vygramul: [www.bitlogic.com image 536x600]

lol this is the most debunked pile of shiat ever, that report says AQ's gonna attack the US in the broadest terms possible, there's nothing specific or actionable in there. what could have been done at that point that would have possibly prevented the hijackings that happened on 9/11? a general alert? there was no precedent for those attacks because nobody expected THAT scenario. it's the worst kind of monday morning quarterbacking to suggest otherwise.

It's a fake I made based on this:

[i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]



LOL, nice!
 
2013-09-21 05:09:28 PM

vygramul: the_dude_abides: vygramul: [i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]

well that's embarrassing... my bad

Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.


Will his "conservative" account be embarrassed, his "liberal" account or his regular account?
 
2013-09-21 05:11:02 PM

freak7: The Obama administration won't even admit to erroneously blaming the attack on an internet video or that when they initially briefed the country, that they were withholding known facts, but hey, they're totally telling the truth about everything else.


So, even assuming you're 110% right here, let look at this.

The sum total of the scandal then, is that they were initially wrong about what caused people to attack the embassy, and that they didn't immediately make public every possible thing they knew?  And that seems like a real scandal to you people? Wow.
 
2013-09-21 05:11:10 PM
.

netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.


They are looking a little worse for wear. Like a car left outdoors in the elements. The chrome is looking a little rusty and the paint has lost its luster. Unfortunately for all of us, the alternative is to drive manure truck that's on fire with no steering wheel, seat belt or brakes.
 
2013-09-21 05:15:17 PM

freak7: The Obama administration won't even admit to erroneously blaming the attack on an internet video or that when they initially briefed the country, that they were withholding known facts, but hey, they're totally telling the truth about everything else.


You're mad that the CIA is withholding facts that might damage national security? You've got to be kidding me.
 
2013-09-21 05:16:48 PM

Mrtraveler01: To think:

If Romney wasn't such a disaster in foreign policy and royally bungled his handling of Benghazi, then the GOP wouldn't have to keep this phony controversy going by trying to make Obama look bad compared to Romney when it comes to foreign policy.

Now it just sounds like sour grapes.



www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com
 
2013-09-21 05:17:28 PM

netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.


This is bad news . . . for Obama!
 
2013-09-21 05:19:59 PM

vygramul: Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.


ok so first off, i flipped my lid thinking it was the 9/11 memo and that was obviously stupid. but you really can't compare the two. a warning about an attack on a consulate gives you a much narrower search area. look what happened a few weeks ago, there was chatter from AQ militants threatening attacks and they pulled all the personnel out of all the embassies in the middle east. that's because there's only a handful of "at risk" targets to consider, whereas a memo that says "hey, AQ wants to strike the US" could mean a gazillion things. little can be done beyond a general elevated posture. it's not the same thing, not even the same ballpark IMO.
 
2013-09-21 05:20:31 PM
Issa is wasting money on stupid useless crap like this, but some people are whining about Obama spending money on vacations.
 
2013-09-21 05:23:30 PM

the_dude_abides: vygramul: Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.

ok so first off, i flipped my lid thinking it was the 9/11 memo and that was obviously stupid. but you really can't compare the two. a warning about an attack on a consulate gives you a much narrower search area. look what happened a few weeks ago, there was chatter from AQ militants threatening attacks and they pulled all the personnel out of all the embassies in the middle east. that's because there's only a handful of "at risk" targets to consider, whereas a memo that says "hey, AQ wants to strike the US" could mean a gazillion things. little can be done beyond a general elevated posture. it's not the same thing, not even the same ballpark IMO.


Yes, even when you're completely wrong you are totally right!  It all makes sense!
 
2013-09-21 05:24:31 PM

the_dude_abides: vygramul: Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.

ok so first off, i flipped my lid thinking it was the 9/11 memo and that was obviously stupid. but you really can't compare the two. a warning about an attack on a consulate gives you a much narrower search area. look what happened a few weeks ago, there was chatter from AQ militants threatening attacks and they pulled all the personnel out of all the embassies in the middle east. that's because there's only a handful of "at risk" targets to consider, whereas a memo that says "hey, AQ wants to strike the US" could mean a gazillion things. little can be done beyond a general elevated posture. it's not the same thing, not even the same ballpark IMO.


That memo was completely, totally faked.
 
2013-09-21 05:26:23 PM

cameroncrazy1984: That memo was completely, totally faked.


which is why i said "my bad" as soon as i realized i mistook it for the 9/11 memo
 
2013-09-21 05:27:30 PM

sugardave: Yes, even when you're completely wrong you are totally right!  It all makes sense!


hey dummy, still waiting for those transcripts :)
 
2013-09-21 05:29:46 PM

freak7: keylock71: Lol... This is what you clods remind me of:

LOL you're incapable of admitting that the Obama administration made any mistakes related to Benghazi.


I am? Please tell me more about what I think, Great Karnack...

You assholes are beating a dead horse, and you're too stupid to realize you've got nothing. Months and months of wasted time and money and you've got nothing except for bloviating from Issa, Graham and McCain.
 
2013-09-21 05:31:19 PM

vygramul: the_dude_abides: vygramul: [i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]

well that's embarrassing... my bad

Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.


Say what?
 
2013-09-21 05:32:04 PM

the_dude_abides: sugardave: Yes, even when you're completely wrong you are totally right!  It all makes sense!

hey dummy, still waiting for those transcripts :)


Like I said, you are unable to stop being an information-moocher.  I am totally shocked.  Get on some more o' dem dar bootstraps and start diggin' away!

Also shocked that you are unable to refrain from personal attacks and name-calling.

Hint:  I'm not really shocked.
 
2013-09-21 05:32:05 PM

vygramul: the_dude_abides: vygramul: [i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]

well that's embarrassing... my bad

Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.


He won't comment. He will ignore it and if you ask him about it he will deny.
 
2013-09-21 05:32:25 PM

Aristocles: vygramul: the_dude_abides: vygramul: [i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]

well that's embarrassing... my bad

Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.

Say what?


Yeah, that's about the right response for you.
 
2013-09-21 05:33:28 PM

Zeppelininthesky: Issa is wasting money on stupid useless crap like this, but some people are whining about Obama spending money on vacations.


But Issa is going to find the Real Killers.
 
2013-09-21 05:35:14 PM

Aristocles: vygramul: the_dude_abides: vygramul: [i.cdn.turner.com image 560x687]

well that's embarrassing... my bad

Not as embarrassed as Aristocles should be.

Say what?


You got played like a chump.

Chump.
 
2013-09-21 05:35:26 PM
Also, does anyone else have a problem with using the word "honorable" to describe Issa?  It seems like an antonym in this case.
 
2013-09-21 05:39:18 PM

Fart_Machine: Zeppelininthesky: Issa is wasting money on stupid useless crap like this, but some people are whining about Obama spending money on vacations.

But Issa is going to find the Real Killers.



We can only hope.
 
2013-09-21 05:42:12 PM

Abner Doon: The sum total of the scandal then, is that they were initially wrong about what caused people to attack the embassy, and that they didn't immediately make public every possible thing they knew?  And that seems like a real scandal to you people? Wow.


I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.
 
2013-09-21 05:42:50 PM
hear
 
2013-09-21 05:43:01 PM
Why not have the families of the deceased testify every year at around this time. It could be a new congressional oversight tradition. The families provide valuable insights into what it's like to be dragged into a political pig circus and used as props.
 
2013-09-21 05:44:19 PM
How many jobs will this create, Darrell? Where's that Laser-Like Focus?

Signed,
-One of your constituents
 
2013-09-21 05:44:40 PM

Fart_Machine: Zeppelininthesky: Issa is wasting money on stupid useless crap like this, but some people are whining about Obama spending money on vacations.

But Issa is going to find the Real Killers.


Issa is going to Italy and Egypt to find the one-armed man responsible for Benghazi.
 
2013-09-21 05:45:17 PM
"Republicans forced Admiral Pickering and Ambassador Mullen to submit to closed door depositions and interviews-rather than allowing them to respond at a public hearing-and then sat on those transcripts for months," Cummings toldThe Cable. "Yesterday, these two respected public servants were finally allowed to address the American people and put these unfounded accusations to rest."

GOP-holes and their knob-slobberers: WHY ARE THERE NO TRANSCRIPTS THAT WE WON'T LET PEOPLE HAVE?!
 
2013-09-21 05:50:05 PM

freak7: I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.


So both sides are bad?
 
2013-09-21 05:51:30 PM

Satanic_Hamster: freak7: I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.

So both sides are bad?


but who should we vote for then!?
 
2013-09-21 05:55:00 PM

the_dude_abides: thamike: Yeah, weird.  Especially weird that anyone can google it and bang, there they are.

link?


http://www.google.com
 
2013-09-21 05:55:22 PM

freak7: Abner Doon: The sum total of the scandal then, is that they were initially wrong about what caused people to attack the embassy, and that they didn't immediately make public every possible thing they knew?  And that seems like a real scandal to you people? Wow.

I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.


Yes, libby-lib-liebruls never offer any criticism of Obama.

You've totally convinced me to steal his time machine and go back to change my vote.  If you can just convince a few million more, we, together, can save this once-great nation!

*eyeroll*
 
2013-09-21 06:04:02 PM

freak7: Abner Doon: The sum total of the scandal then, is that they were initially wrong about what caused people to attack the embassy, and that they didn't immediately make public every possible thing they knew?  And that seems like a real scandal to you people? Wow.

I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.


You mean like this?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57584921/officials-on-benghazi-w e- made-mistakes-but-without-malice/

Now do you see why this is not considered a scandal?

Now do you see why everyone laughs at the side that won't admit that it is not a scandal?
 
2013-09-21 06:08:30 PM

Heliovdrake: but who should we vote for then!?


Given his previous claims that we found WMD's in Iraq and that George Zimmerman is a national hero, I'm going to guess....  Hmmm.
 
2013-09-21 06:08:53 PM
 
2013-09-21 06:08:57 PM

Dinki: It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.


If it happens to Issa.... it wouldn't be a tragedy, would it.
 
2013-09-21 06:09:04 PM
The GOP certainly loves their manufactured scandals and crisises these days... Too bad they don't put half the effort they put into being outraged into governing effectively.
 
2013-09-21 06:09:24 PM

notto: freak7: Abner Doon: The sum total of the scandal then, is that they were initially wrong about what caused people to attack the embassy, and that they didn't immediately make public every possible thing they knew?  And that seems like a real scandal to you people? Wow.

I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.

You mean like this?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57584921/officials-on-benghazi-w e- made-mistakes-but-without-malice/

Now do you see why this is not considered a scandal?

Now do you see why everyone laughs at the side that won't admit that it is not a scandal?


CBS News is a liberal mainstream MSM media, so it cannot be trusted.  Totally in the tank for 0bama, and there was totally malice involved.  That's the scandal.  Such as.
 
2013-09-21 06:09:40 PM

freak7: Abner Doon: The sum total of the scandal then, is that they were initially wrong about what caused people to attack the embassy, and that they didn't immediately make public every possible thing they knew?  And that seems like a real scandal to you people? Wow.

I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.


Mistakes were made in Benghazi, of course, but the Republicans are acting like there's some crazy cover-up or conspiracy and are entirely focused on making Obama look bad.  They should instead be offering up proposals on how to prevent such an attack from happening again, but of course they haven't because they don't care about that part.
 
2013-09-21 06:10:04 PM

Satanic_Hamster: So both sides are bad?


Both sides make mistakes.
 
2013-09-21 06:12:03 PM

notto: Now do you see why this is not considered a scandal?


When did I say it was a scandal? There does seem to be some incompetence still floating around considering there are known suspects that have been identified and not arrested.
 
2013-09-21 06:12:05 PM

Almost Everybody Poops: They should instead be offering up proposals on how to prevent such an attack from happening again, but of course they haven't because they don't care about that part.


I'm sure that's why they called the parents of the dead staff to testify about.  Certainly it wasn't a political stunt to leverage the death of consulate staff.
 
2013-09-21 06:12:24 PM

freak7: Satanic_Hamster: So both sides are bad?

Both sides make mistakes.


And one side admits it.  Guess which side NEVER admits mistakes?  They just can't, because if they did, it might make them look like they don't ALWAYS know the right answer to something.  Huh.  I wonder which side that is?  I can't quite put my finger on it...
 
2013-09-21 06:15:24 PM

Almost Everybody Poops: freak7: Abner Doon: The sum total of the scandal then, is that they were initially wrong about what caused people to attack the embassy, and that they didn't immediately make public every possible thing they knew?  And that seems like a real scandal to you people? Wow.

I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.

Mistakes were made in Benghazi, of course, but the Republicans are acting like there's some crazy cover-up or conspiracy and are entirely focused on making Obama look bad.  They should instead be offering up proposals on how to prevent such an attack from happening again, but of course they haven't because they don't care about that part.


Seriously - is this the scandal?

www.bitlogic.com

'Cause if it isn't, please point out wherein this incident the scandal lies. And if it is, you really have to explain WHY that makes it a scandal. It seems the important points are not in dispute:

Did the embassy get attacked?
Yes.
Was embassy security insufficient to repel the attack?
Yes.
Did four Americans get killed?
Yes.

No one is denying those. Soooooo...
 
2013-09-21 06:15:49 PM

sugardave: And one side admits it.


When did they admit to anything, before or after it blew up in the news?
 
2013-09-21 06:16:10 PM

Benevolent Misanthrope: While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.


If he's looking for facts about Benghazi, howcome he's not visiting the one place where Benghazi actually happened?
 
2013-09-21 06:17:08 PM
I bet it just blows most of your minds that Boehner agrees with Obama about Syria, doesn't it?
 
2013-09-21 06:17:43 PM

freak7: Blame the White House for their refusal to admit that mistakes were made.


They admitted that mistakes were made.  You really should keep up.
 
2013-09-21 06:18:00 PM

Gyrfalcon: Benevolent Misanthrope: While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.

If he's looking for facts about Benghazi, howcome he's not visiting the one place where Benghazi actually happened?


Haven't you seen the pic of Obama with his shoe on the desk? Issa is no fool.
 
2013-09-21 06:19:22 PM

freak7: The Obama administration won't even admit to erroneously blaming the attack on an internet video or that when they initially briefed the country, that they were withholding known facts, but hey, they're totally telling the truth about everything else.


At least you didn't call it a scandal.
 
2013-09-21 06:21:30 PM

freak7: I bet it just blows most of your minds that Boehner agrees with Obama about Syria, doesn't it?


Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?  This thread is about the non-scandal of Benghazi.
 
2013-09-21 06:21:35 PM

Gyrfalcon: Benevolent Misanthrope: While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.

If he's looking for facts about Benghazi, howcome he's not visiting the one place where Benghazi actually happened?


Because Beghazi actually happened in 5 star resort hotel. You believe it happened at an American consulate out in middle of nowhere Lybia? You've been listening to the liberal lame stream MSM media too much. You need to study it out.
 
2013-09-21 06:22:27 PM

freak7: I bet it just blows most of your minds that Boehner agrees with Obama about Syria, doesn't it?


Now I know you're trolling

/yes, i'm childish
 
2013-09-21 06:23:04 PM

freak7: sugardave: And one side admits it.

When did they admit to anything, before or after it blew up in the news?


Oh, I'm sorry, I was talking about mistakes as a general concept.  You know, any mistake at all.  Let me know if you have any proof of admitting to mistakes by the GOP-holes re: anything they've done in the last 40 years.

However,  I believe someone already replied to you about this up thread a bit.  Reading comprehension, use it.

Or are you now complaining they took too long to say that mistakes were made?  Because, if you were going to wait for your typical GOP-hole or Teahadist to admit making a mistake, you'd have to wait for the heat death of the universe.  So, yet another win for the libby-lib-liebruls.  Don't you feel foolish?
 
2013-09-21 06:23:25 PM

freak7: sugardave: And one side admits it.

When did they admit to anything, before or after it blew up in the news?


You move goalposts more than field maintenance at a mutlipurpose arena.
 
2013-09-21 06:24:57 PM

max_pooper: Gyrfalcon: Benevolent Misanthrope: While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.

If he's looking for facts about Benghazi, howcome he's not visiting the one place where Benghazi actually happened?

Because Beghazi actually happened in 5 star resort hotel. You believe it happened at an American consulate out in middle of nowhere Lybia? You've been listening to the liberal lame stream MSM media too much. You need to study it out.


Oh, I hadn't heard that! You're right. I guess he'll need some time to determine if it was at a Hilton or a Marriott. And who knows, it could have been as far away as Dubai.
 
2013-09-21 06:26:15 PM
Is there anything Republicans feel they can win without cheating?

/BTW, Is DeLay running for Congress in 2014?
 
2013-09-21 06:27:46 PM

freak7: I bet it just blows most of your minds that Boehner agrees with Obama about Syria, doesn't it?


Lol... Oh man. Awesome.
 
2013-09-21 06:28:09 PM

lilbjorn: Is there anything Republicans feel they can win without cheating?

/BTW, Is DeLay running for Congress in 2014?


Best Regressive/Draconian Legislation?
Most Bibles Owned?
Best Closet Hider?

They can be winners, you just have to put them in the right contests.
 
2013-09-21 06:28:40 PM
An American lay here.  And the other.  They crawled.  Their hands were bound.  Their bonds were cut.  They ran over here ... and were followed.  The tracks lead away from the terrorist attack!  Into ... Derphorn Forest.
 
2013-09-21 06:29:24 PM
The Republicans were really hoping to turn this into a scandal so that they could use it to discredit Hillary Clinton's leadership as Secretary of State when she runs for President (which possibility terrifies them).
What the Republicans should really worry about is their internal division and lack of any prospective candidate who isn't demonstrably a clown or just hideously tainted. (See every GOP candidate from last Presidential election.)
 
2013-09-21 06:31:04 PM

vygramul: Was embassy security insufficient to repel the attack?
Yes.


Did the GOP vote to slash embassy security funding prior to this attack?
Yes.
 
2013-09-21 06:33:17 PM

red5ish: The Republicans were really hoping to turn this into a scandal so that they could use it to discredit Hillary Clinton's leadership as Secretary of State when she runs for President (which possibility terrifies them).
What the Republicans should really worry about is their internal division and lack of any prospective candidate who isn't demonstrably a clown or just hideously tainted. (See every GOP candidate from last Presidential election.)


You misspelled "conservative enough."
 
2013-09-21 06:35:28 PM

notto: Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?


They admitted to a couple of minor mistakes, only after it blew up in the media and they could no longer deny them without looking like idiots. Since we know they were so willing to lie about something as minor as the reason for the attack, why are you so sure they're telling the truth about everything else?
 
2013-09-21 06:38:25 PM

sugardave: red5ish: The Republicans were really hoping to turn this into a scandal so that they could use it to discredit Hillary Clinton's leadership as Secretary of State when she runs for President (which possibility terrifies them).
What the Republicans should really worry about is their internal division and lack of any prospective candidate who isn't demonstrably a clown or just hideously tainted. (See every GOP candidate from last Presidential election.)

You misspelled "conservative enough."


I just wanted to use the term "hideously tainted" in a sentence.
 
2013-09-21 06:38:50 PM

freak7: notto: Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?

They admitted to a couple of minor mistakes, only after it blew up in the media and they could no longer deny them without looking like idiots. Since we know they were so willing to lie about something as minor as the reason for the attack, why are you so sure they're telling the truth about everything else?


Ah, so you ARE complaining that it was too long before they admitted a mistake.  You must be out of your mind with concern about the planet-sized passel of mistakes the GOP-holes and Teahadists make every single second that passes.

You might need to get some good ol' Socialized medicine for that kind of suffering.
 
2013-09-21 06:40:50 PM

freak7: notto: Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?

They admitted to a couple of minor mistakes, only after it blew up in the media and they could no longer deny them without looking like idiots. Since we know they were so willing to lie about something as minor as the reason for the attack, why are you so sure they're telling the truth about everything else?


So, they were willing to admit that mistakes were made?  Doesn't that directly contradict your earlier claims that you repeated until you changed the subject?
 
2013-09-21 06:40:50 PM
Lets hear some justification for the Democrats leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.
 
2013-09-21 06:42:35 PM

max_pooper: Satanic_Hamster: max_pooper: Satanic_Hamster: LarryDan43: I've had farts more important than what happened in Benghazi.

More people have died from me masturbating then died at Bengahzi.

People or kittens?

People.

That is some furious masturbation.


I know a guy who screwed up his knee so bad, he required a cane for a few years. This was caused, somehow, by masturbation, but he wouldn't go further into detail (it was one of those I don't wanna know...but I GOTTA KNOW situations). Some people are into some stuff...
 
2013-09-21 06:43:33 PM

freak7: Lets hear some justification for the Democrats leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.


Let's hear some justification for the Republicans leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.  (you do realize that republicans left also, right?)
 
2013-09-21 06:43:59 PM
If this is how Republicans react when we elect an African-American, I can't wait to see what they do when we elect a Vagina-American.
 
2013-09-21 06:45:17 PM

notto: freak7: Lets hear some justification for the Democrats leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.

Let's hear some justification for the Republicans leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.  (you do realize that republicans left also, right?)


UNPOSSIBLE!  That would mean it was a farce of a "hearing" and created only to try and make Democrats look bad!

(can't wait to see where this tangent leads, though)
 
2013-09-21 06:46:44 PM

Notabunny: If this is how Republicans react when we elect an African-American, I can't wait to see what they do when we elect a Vagina-American.


It's going to be epic.  I predict a full-on civil war, with actual gunfire battles, between GOP-hole women and smart women.
 
2013-09-21 06:47:32 PM

notto: Let's hear some justification for the Republicans leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.  (you do realize that republicans left also, right?)


14 Democrats left, how many Republicans left?
 
2013-09-21 06:48:09 PM

freak7: notto: Let's hear some justification for the Republicans leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.  (you do realize that republicans left also, right?)

14 Democrats left, how many Republicans left?


18.
 
2013-09-21 06:48:22 PM

freak7: Lets hear some justification for the Democrats leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.


Kinda funny how you're now trotting out every lame talking point about this so-called scandal now.  So much for just wanting Democrats to admit to whatever small mistakes were made immediately in the wake of a terrorist attack, huh?
 
2013-09-21 06:50:34 PM

Abner Doon: freak7: Lets hear some justification for the Democrats leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.

Kinda funny how you're now trotting out every lame talking point about this so-called scandal now.  So much for just wanting Democrats to admit to whatever small mistakes were made immediately in the wake of a terrorist attack, huh?


He's just trying to hold both sides to the same high standards.  Like a Troo Murrican Paytreeot should.
 
2013-09-21 06:51:29 PM

notto: 18.


Prove it.
 
2013-09-21 06:52:30 PM

LouDobbsAwaaaay: vygramul: Was embassy security insufficient to repel the attack?
Yes.

Did the GOP vote to slash embassy security funding prior to this attack?
Yes.


Sure - but that's really just collateral. The question is where, SPECIFICALLY, the scandal is purported to exist. I can't find it. It seems to me that conservatives have been unable to articulate the problem.
 
2013-09-21 06:54:05 PM

freak7: notto: 18.

Prove it.


You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.

If we are just going to look at pictures, we can start here.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/09/20/these-pictures-prove-fox-is-l y ing-democrats-did/196000
 
2013-09-21 06:55:07 PM
 
2013-09-21 06:56:11 PM

notto: You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.


There are hundreds of sources showing who walked out, I'm not doing your research for you.
 
2013-09-21 06:56:25 PM

notto: freak7: notto: Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?

They admitted to a couple of minor mistakes, only after it blew up in the media and they could no longer deny them without looking like idiots. Since we know they were so willing to lie about something as minor as the reason for the attack, why are you so sure they're telling the truth about everything else?

So, they were willing to admit that mistakes were made?  Doesn't that directly contradict your earlier claims that you repeated until you changed the subject?


Yeah, the "lie" thing again?

Okay, let's do this.

The attack against the American consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi was an act of terrorism that was perpetrated by AQ and backed up by local militias who *were* incensed over the release of that agit-prop video.

The reason for the attack remains AQ's ongoing war against America and America's lethal response to that.

That noted, among the reasons it was able to take place successfully (from the terorist's POV) was A) because many local militias *were* in a tizzy over the video and were ready to assist AQ in their plans and B) Because the protests against that video (that took place not only in the middle east but all over the world resulting in many deaths and injuries) had stretched thin America's ability to protect all of it's assets at once.

Pretending that the video wasn't a factor shows you aren't taking this seriously at all.
 
2013-09-21 06:57:07 PM

freak7: notto: You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.

There are hundreds of sources showing who walked out, I'm not doing your research for you.


oooo, burn

But, look like you're wrong.  Again.  Imagine that.
 
2013-09-21 06:58:41 PM

freak7: notto: You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.

There are hundreds of sources showing who walked out, I'm not doing your research for you.


Then my claim stands as solid as yours.  More Republicans than Democrats left the hearing before the parents 'testified'.  Just look at the pictures.  Or, you can provide one of these hundreds of sources that show who walked out (from both sides of the aisle).  Or, is this just another unsupported claim you are going to make (and then back peddle from).

Way to go freak!  Thanks for bringing that up to be pointed out.
 
2013-09-21 06:58:51 PM

freak7: notto: 18.

Prove it.


OK.


.
 
2013-09-21 06:59:41 PM

sugardave: thamike: the_dude_abides: fun fact about the "exhaustive" benghazi ARB: state dept did not transcribe the interviews that were conducted. also, despite the fact that the house oversight committee has issued a subpoena demanding them, the state dept is not making the summaries of those interviews available. weird...

Yeah, weird.  Especially weird that anyone can google it and bang, there they are.

You just lost.  See, you thought you would be able to convince the troll to enlighten himself.  Now you just gave him another opportunity to say "prove it, I'm a lazy good-for-nothing information moocher."


I had no illusions about it.  I'm acquainted with his un-dude-like behavior.  I'm perfectly fine with merely letting the Unburdened with Proof generation expose themselves more than they meant to.  Obviously, not for their benefit.
 
2013-09-21 07:00:59 PM

Fart_Machine: OK.


That picture was taken during a bathroom break, nice try though.
 
2013-09-21 07:01:21 PM

sugardave: freak7: notto: You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.

There are hundreds of sources showing who walked out, I'm not doing your research for you.

oooo, burn

But, look like you're wrong.  Again.  Imagine that.


He seen 100's of sources stating exactly who walked out of the hearing but had no idea that 18 of the 24 republicans on the committee were absent during the families "testimony"?

It's almost as if he is a liar and a hypocrite all wrapped up in a neat little package.
 
2013-09-21 07:01:24 PM

red5ish: The Republicans were really hoping to turn this into a scandal so that they could use it to discredit Hillary Clinton's leadership as Secretary of State when she runs for President (which possibility terrifies them).
What the Republicans should really worry about is their internal division and lack of any prospective candidate who isn't demonstrably a clown or just hideously tainted. (See every GOP candidate from last Presidential election.)


Ya think?

http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress/why-darrell-issa-might-want- to -cancel-his-latest-benghazi-hearing-20130918
 
2013-09-21 07:01:38 PM

freak7: Fart_Machine: OK.

That picture was taken during a bathroom break, nice try though.


Prove it.
 
2013-09-21 07:04:10 PM
Was this during a bathroom break?

cloudfront.mediamatters.org

I guess Issa wouldn't give the parents a bathroom break.  That monster.
 
2013-09-21 07:10:23 PM

quatchi: notto: freak7: notto: Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?

They admitted to a couple of minor mistakes, only after it blew up in the media and they could no longer deny them without looking like idiots. Since we know they were so willing to lie about something as minor as the reason for the attack, why are you so sure they're telling the truth about everything else?

So, they were willing to admit that mistakes were made?  Doesn't that directly contradict your earlier claims that you repeated until you changed the subject?

Yeah, the "lie" thing again?

Okay, let's do this.

The attack against the American consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi was an act of terrorism that was perpetrated by AQ and backed up by local militias who *were* incensed over the release of that agit-prop video.

The reason for the attack remains AQ's ongoing war against America and America's lethal response to that.

That noted, among the reasons it was able to take place successfully (from the terorist's POV) was A) because many local militias *were* in a tizzy over the video and were ready to assist AQ in their plans and B) Because the protests against that video (that took place not only in the middle east but all over the world resulting in many deaths and injuries) had stretched thin America's ability to protect all of it's assets at once.

Pretending that the video wasn't a factor shows you aren't taking this seriously at all.


Whaaaaaaat? After he went into hiding, Sam Bacile, the film's maker, called Islam a cancer and said he wanted his film to make a political statement. Only a liberal would pretend that Mr Bacile's film could somehow be offensive.
 
2013-09-21 07:13:05 PM

notto: Was this during a bathroom break?

[cloudfront.mediamatters.org image 600x443]

I guess Issa wouldn't give the parents a bathroom break.  That monster.


2.bp.blogspot.com

"There's a C-Span 3!?  Foiled again!"
 
2013-09-21 07:14:51 PM

freak7: Blame the White House for their refusal to admit that mistakes were made.


Login:    freak7
Account created:    2013-08-19 21:33:14


cbsmancave.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-09-21 07:15:40 PM

freak7: Blame the White House for their refusal to admit that mistakes were made.


Please explain.......
 
2013-09-21 07:17:24 PM
I can't wait until this scandal includes the claim that internet trolls are purposely trying to make Republicans look bad by repeating easily debunked lies about the scandal.  After all, if they are willing to lie about stuff so easily debunked, why would we trust them on anything else?

It's the circle of derp.
 
2013-09-21 07:18:46 PM

SurfaceTension: King Something: SilentStrider: What are the odds he finds any actual facts?

I'd wager it's about as likely as me voluntarily eating a Chicago-style pizza.

/New Yorker
//Brooklynite

Well, Chicago style IS better


This. I'd rather have a real pizza, then that weak, limp crap they serve you in New York.
 
2013-09-21 07:20:22 PM
Can he change his last name to Benghazi?

/he must get a weird boner anytime someone mentions the word
 
2013-09-21 07:21:29 PM

thamike: notto: Was this during a bathroom break?

[cloudfront.mediamatters.org image 600x443]

I guess Issa wouldn't give the parents a bathroom break.  That monster.



"There's a C-Span 3!?  Foiled again!"


I usually watch C-Span 8: The Ocho
 
2013-09-21 07:24:13 PM
What's more pathetic, the fact that the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing, or the fact that Farklibs will give any old GOP/Benghazi thread 200+ comments?
 
2013-09-21 07:26:31 PM

Aristocles: What's more pathetic, the fact that the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing, or the fact that Farklibs will give any old GOP/Benghazi thread 200+ comments?


you go to thread with the stupid you have, not the stupid you wish you had.
 
2013-09-21 07:29:04 PM

FlashHarry: freak7: Blame the White House for their refusal to admit that mistakes were made.

Login:    freak7
Account created:    2013-08-19 21:33:14


[cbsmancave.files.wordpress.com image 500x475]


He was originally created as a Zimmerman thread racist troll account.  It's nice that the owner has moved on to other tabs of trolling.
 
2013-09-21 07:29:11 PM

Aristocles: What's more pathetic, the fact that the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing, or the fact that Farklibs will give any old GOP/Benghazi thread 200+ comments?


That the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing.  Clearly.
 
2013-09-21 07:31:35 PM
Remember:

winkprogress.com
 
2013-09-21 07:34:41 PM
I am not sure why the Republican Party chose this strategy. If you wanted to maximize the political damage to the Democrats among independents, this isn't how you go about doing it. If you want to maximize energizing your base, you do this. This didn't really make sense during the election - GOP turnout is always pretty good. And, empirically, we lost the election. Was it the idea that money would win the election? It wasn't a bad bet, certainly from a Democrat perspective, because the Democratic Party has been rather upset that Citizens United would lose elections. Maybe the GOP thought the same thing, and opted for energizing the base. Once committed, they can't back down elegantly. Then again, some people might be positioning themselves for 2016. Maybe not the presidency, but a promotion to either leadership positions or to the Senate.
 
2013-09-21 07:37:54 PM

Ricardo Klement: I am not sure why the Republican Party chose this strategy. If you wanted to maximize the political damage to the Democrats among independents, this isn't how you go about doing it. If you want to maximize energizing your base, you do this. This didn't really make sense during the election - GOP turnout is always pretty good. And, empirically, we lost the election. Was it the idea that money would win the election? It wasn't a bad bet, certainly from a Democrat perspective, because the Democratic Party has been rather upset that Citizens United would lose elections. Maybe the GOP thought the same thing, and opted for energizing the base. Once committed, they can't back down elegantly. Then again, some people might be positioning themselves for 2016. Maybe not the presidency, but a promotion to either leadership positions or to the Senate.


take those considerations, fold them up, and put them in your pocket. that's better.

now consider the possibility that they actually believe their own delusions. they've climbed up their own echo-chambered assholes so far that they haven't seen daylight for years.

why apply reason or causality to a situation where the people being discussed have displayed neither?
 
2013-09-21 07:39:44 PM

heap: Ricardo Klement: I am not sure why the Republican Party chose this strategy. If you wanted to maximize the political damage to the Democrats among independents, this isn't how you go about doing it. If you want to maximize energizing your base, you do this. This didn't really make sense during the election - GOP turnout is always pretty good. And, empirically, we lost the election. Was it the idea that money would win the election? It wasn't a bad bet, certainly from a Democrat perspective, because the Democratic Party has been rather upset that Citizens United would lose elections. Maybe the GOP thought the same thing, and opted for energizing the base. Once committed, they can't back down elegantly. Then again, some people might be positioning themselves for 2016. Maybe not the presidency, but a promotion to either leadership positions or to the Senate.

take those considerations, fold them up, and put them in your pocket. that's better.

now consider the possibility that they actually believe their own delusions. they've climbed up their own echo-chambered assholes so far that they haven't seen daylight for years.

why apply reason or causality to a situation where the people being discussed have displayed neither?


Well, the tea party certainly believes in their crap. The question is why the Republican leadership is allowing it.
 
2013-09-21 07:39:54 PM

Aristocles: What's more pathetic, the fact that the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing, or the fact that Farklibs will give any old GOP/Benghazi thread 200+ comments?


What's a Farklib?
 
2013-09-21 07:41:10 PM

Ricardo Klement: I am not sure why the Republican Party chose this strategy. If you wanted to maximize the political damage to the Democrats among independents, this isn't how you go about doing it. If you want to maximize energizing your base, you do this. This didn't really make sense during the election - GOP turnout is always pretty good. And, empirically, we lost the election. Was it the idea that money would win the election? It wasn't a bad bet, certainly from a Democrat perspective, because the Democratic Party has been rather upset that Citizens United would lose elections. Maybe the GOP thought the same thing, and opted for energizing the base. Once committed, they can't back down elegantly. Then again, some people might be positioning themselves for 2016. Maybe not the presidency, but a promotion to either leadership positions or to the Senate.


If it's the GOP's plan to milk this for votes and money, then they peaked early. Nobody will care by the 2014 midterms, and nobody will remember by 2016.
 
2013-09-21 07:42:13 PM

max_pooper: Gyrfalcon: Benevolent Misanthrope: While not actually visiting Benghazi itself, Issa will be flying out for North Africa on Sunday with stops in Italy and Egypt along the way.

I hear Rome is nice this time of year.

If he's looking for facts about Benghazi, howcome he's not visiting the one place where Benghazi actually happened?

Because Beghazi actually happened in 5 star resort hotel. You believe it happened at an American consulate out in middle of nowhere Lybia? You've been listening to the liberal lame stream MSM media too much. You need to study it out.


I'm sure the Conservative Media will react with EXACTLY as much vitriol and contempt as they did when they called President Obama's goodwill Africa trip a "vacation." Not even a "glorified vacation," a STRAIGHT-UP, put your feet up and relax vacation.

/but hey, I'm sure Issa will find PLENTY about Benghazi by staying as far away from it as possible
 
2013-09-21 07:42:22 PM
Ricardo Klement:
Well, the tea party certainly believes in their crap. The question is why the Republican leadership is allowing it.

i think you  mistake what exactly republican leadership is.

it isn't the guy with the gavel.

make more sense now?
 
2013-09-21 07:43:12 PM

Aristocles: What's more pathetic, the fact that the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing, or the fact that Farklibs will give any old GOP/Benghazi thread 200+ comments?


Which is wasting actual taxpayer money?

/that's the worse one
 
2013-09-21 07:44:07 PM

Ricardo Klement: I am not sure why the Republican Party chose this strategy. If you wanted to maximize the political damage to the Democrats among independents, this isn't how you go about doing it. If you want to maximize energizing your base, you do this. This didn't really make sense during the election - GOP turnout is always pretty good. And, empirically, we lost the election. Was it the idea that money would win the election? It wasn't a bad bet, certainly from a Democrat perspective, because the Democratic Party has been rather upset that Citizens United would lose elections. Maybe the GOP thought the same thing, and opted for energizing the base. Once committed, they can't back down elegantly. Then again, some people might be positioning themselves for 2016. Maybe not the presidency, but a promotion to either leadership positions or to the Senate.


Except, what you're not realizing is the GOP isn't "trying to make Benghazi a thing." Obama himself said that he was going to hunt down those who were responsible.

I guess by "hunt down terrorists" he really meant "arrest a youtube d-bag."

Thanks, Obama!
 
2013-09-21 07:44:13 PM

Aristocles: What's more pathetic, the fact that the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing, or the fact that Farklibs will give any old GOP/Benghazi thread 200+ comments?


Half of which can be contributed to you and the freak. Nice try, though. You gave it a couple of months, which is all anyone can really expect out of your ilk. Your just not cut out for it. Neither trolling or debate. There's no shame in admitting it and gracefully bowing out while you can save some face.
 
2013-09-21 07:45:13 PM

Notabunny: Ricardo Klement: I am not sure why the Republican Party chose this strategy. If you wanted to maximize the political damage to the Democrats among independents, this isn't how you go about doing it. If you want to maximize energizing your base, you do this. This didn't really make sense during the election - GOP turnout is always pretty good. And, empirically, we lost the election. Was it the idea that money would win the election? It wasn't a bad bet, certainly from a Democrat perspective, because the Democratic Party has been rather upset that Citizens United would lose elections. Maybe the GOP thought the same thing, and opted for energizing the base. Once committed, they can't back down elegantly. Then again, some people might be positioning themselves for 2016. Maybe not the presidency, but a promotion to either leadership positions or to the Senate.

If it's the GOP's plan to milk this for votes and money, then they peaked early. Nobody will care by the 2014 midterms, and nobody will remember by 2016.


Sadly, they could have just walked away and Benghazi would be a little remembered misfire against Obama - one of many. Too late now.
 
2013-09-21 07:45:38 PM

Aristocles: Thanks, Obama!


Who's Oba...wait, dammit.
 
2013-09-21 07:46:39 PM

cameroncrazy1984: Aristocles: Thanks, Obama!

Who's Oba...wait, dammit.


Snert.
 
2013-09-21 07:47:12 PM

Empty Matchbook: Aristocles: What's more pathetic, the fact that the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing, or the fact that Farklibs will give any old GOP/Benghazi thread 200+ comments?

Which is wasting actual taxpayer money?

/that's the worse one


Since he can't help but post easily debunked bullshiat in Benghazi threads and he is a lazy bum sucking government teet, I would say both.
 
2013-09-21 07:48:33 PM
I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.
 
2013-09-21 07:51:06 PM

Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.


dude, just step out of character for a minute. being this blatant amounts to the same thing, but is much less respectable.
 
2013-09-21 07:51:41 PM

Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.


Who is Bob?
 
2013-09-21 07:52:10 PM
Aristocles:

I can't decide if you are adorable, or pathetic.
 
2013-09-21 07:52:35 PM

Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.


Who's Hildawg?
/amidoinitrite?
 
2013-09-21 07:54:35 PM
Aristocles:

I guess by "hunt down terrorists" he really meant "arrest a youtube d-bag."

Thanks, Obama!


Just so we are clear and you can't later move the goalposts, are you claiming this is the only thing that has been done to hunt down the perpetrators of the Benghazi attack?

Please be clear.
 
2013-09-21 07:58:43 PM
"And number three, we are going to find out who did this and we're going to hunt them down, because one of the things that I've said throughout my presidency is when folks mess with Americans, we go after them. " - BOB

I must have missed the Fark.com thread about Obama hunting down the terrorists. Does anyone have a link?

Or has Obama broken yet another campaign promise?
 
2013-09-21 07:59:58 PM
I think I found  halfof33's new handle.
 
2013-09-21 08:00:41 PM
Perhaps Rep. Issa will be able to meet with and shmooze some Ansar al-Sharia members and question them about how the events really went down, that night.

Preferably, in a dark alley, with no witnesses.
 
2013-09-21 08:01:42 PM

netcentric: Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.


i.imgur.com
i.imgur.com
 
2013-09-21 08:02:02 PM

Aristocles: "And number three, we are going to find out who did this and we're going to hunt them down, because one of the things that I've said throughout my presidency is when folks mess with Americans, we go after them. " - BOB

I must have missed the Fark.com thread about Obama hunting down the terrorists. Does anyone have a link?

Or has Obama broken yet another campaign promise?


Link
 
2013-09-21 08:03:39 PM

Almost Everybody Poops: I think I found  halfof33's new handle.


It took you this long?
 
2013-09-21 08:05:29 PM

SurfaceTension: King Something: SilentStrider: What are the odds he finds any actual facts?

I'd wager it's about as likely as me voluntarily eating a Chicago-style pizza.

/New Yorker
//Brooklynite

Well, Chicago style IS better


meh, i'm not a NY/Chicago partisan, but my dad's got an AMAZING recipe for chicago-style deep dish...  personally for me it's more a convenience thing.  if

Satanic_Hamster: max_pooper: That is some furious masturbation.

I'm named my technique "Furious Two Fisted Monkey Style."


"double-fisting-monkey-steals-the-peach?"
 
2013-09-21 08:07:29 PM

quatchi: notto: freak7: notto: Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?

They admitted to a couple of minor mistakes, only after it blew up in the media and they could no longer deny them without looking like idiots. Since we know they were so willing to lie about something as minor as the reason for the attack, why are you so sure they're telling the truth about everything else?

So, they were willing to admit that mistakes were made?  Doesn't that directly contradict your earlier claims that you repeated until you changed the subject?

Yeah, the "lie" thing again?

Okay, let's do this.

The attack against the American consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi was an act of terrorism that was perpetrated by AQ and backed up by local militias who *were* incensed over the release of that agit-prop video.

The reason for the attack remains AQ's ongoing war against America and America's lethal response to that.

That noted, among the reasons it was able to take place successfully (from the terorist's POV) was A) because many local militias *were* in a tizzy over the video and were ready to assist AQ in their plans and B) Because the protests against that video (that took place not only in the middle east but all over the world resulting in many deaths and injuries) had stretched thin America's ability to protect all of it's assets at once.

Pretending that the video wasn't a factor shows you aren't taking this seriously at all.


The other thing is that Youtube video was also the cause of protests in Cairo and Afghanistan in which the US Embassy's there had violent protests as well.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/09/11/c ai ro-us-embassy-protesters-prophet-mohammad/70000126/1#.Uj4wKtKsh8E

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_Innocence_of_Muslims#Prote st s_at_diplomatic_missions

It wasn't like this Youtube thing was made up out of thin air. That's why I find it stupid that people think the videomakers are somehow innocent.

It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.
 
2013-09-21 08:07:43 PM

Somacandra: Almost Everybody Poops: I think I found  halfof33's new handle.

It took you this long?


ಠ_ಠ

yes....
 
2013-09-21 08:08:06 PM

Aristocles: "And number three, we are going to find out who did this and we're going to hunt them down, because one of the things that I've said throughout my presidency is when folks mess with Americans, we go after them. " - BOB

I must have missed the Fark.com thread about Obama hunting down the terrorists. Does anyone have a link?

Or has Obama broken yet another campaign promise?


Who is Bob?
 
2013-09-21 08:09:03 PM
I'm amazed that Troll7 isn't suffering from a stomachache and throwing up right now.
 
2013-09-21 08:09:14 PM

max_pooper: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

Who is Bob?


www.station292.com
 
2013-09-21 08:10:43 PM

Aristocles: The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.


Funny'd.

Would the GOP give a shiat about the families of the slain if Romney won the election?

I think we all know the answer.
 
2013-09-21 08:11:48 PM
A whopping 41 percent of Republicans polled think the Obama administration's handling of Benghazi is the greatest scandal in U.S. history. "One interesting thing about the voters who think Benghazi is the biggest political scandal in American history," PPP adds, "is that 39% of them don't actually know where it is. 10% think it's in Egypt, 9% in Iran, 6% in Cuba, 5% in Syria, 4% in Iraq, and 1% each in North Korea and Liberia with 4% not willing to venture a guess."

Good grief.
 
2013-09-21 08:12:13 PM

Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.


Are you still really trying to invent new nicknames and memes?  How's that goin' for ya?  Doesn't seem to be sticking.

But then again, you're probably just coming up with this stuff to increase the reply count so then you can complain about it, right?
 
2013-09-21 08:13:17 PM
Yeah, what's this bob thing, some kind of new freeper/teaderp code word?
 
2013-09-21 08:13:46 PM

Ricardo Klement: I am not sure why the Republican Party chose this strategy. If you wanted to maximize the political damage to the Democrats among independents, this isn't how you go about doing it. If you want to maximize energizing your base, you do this. This didn't really make sense during the election - GOP turnout is always pretty good. And, empirically, we lost the election. Was it the idea that money would win the election? It wasn't a bad bet, certainly from a Democrat perspective, because the Democratic Party has been rather upset that Citizens United would lose elections. Maybe the GOP thought the same thing, and opted for energizing the base. Once committed, they can't back down elegantly. Then again, some people might be positioning themselves for 2016. Maybe not the presidency, but a promotion to either leadership positions or to the Senate.


It's obviously much too late for this to prevent Obama from beating Romney, but they keep raping the dead horse in hopes that it either leads to Obama getting impeached or that it taints Hillary's chances of winning in 2016, since the GOP is scared sh*tless of her.
 
2013-09-21 08:15:44 PM

KarmicDisaster: Yeah, what's this bob thing, some kind of new freeper/teaderp code word?


It's short for Robert. Which Robert he is talking about I'm not sure.
 
2013-09-21 08:16:21 PM

LeoffDaGrate: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

Are you still really trying to invent new nicknames and memes?  How's that goin' for ya?  Doesn't seem to be sticking.

But then again, you're probably just coming up with this stuff to increase the reply count so then you can complain about it, right?


Hil-dawg is from South Park
BOB is from Brick House
"Read a book sometime" is from another Farker

My only original contribution of late, that I know of, is "Jesus H.W. Christ," and I've been saying that for years.

Folks who are still harping on "potatoe" don't really have a lot of room to talk.
 
2013-09-21 08:16:36 PM

Mrtraveler01: The other thing is that Youtube video was also the cause of protests in Cairo and Afghanistan in which the US Embassy's there had violent protests as well.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/09/11/c ai ro-us-embassy-protesters-prophet-mohammad/70000126/1#.Uj4wKtKsh8E

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_Innocence_of_Muslims#Prote st s_at_diplomatic_missions

It wasn't like this Youtube thing was made up out of thin air. That's why I find it stupid that people think the videomakers are somehow innocent.

It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.


Yup, but ya try to tell a teahaddist that and it's all "Herpa Derpa Doo! Obama lied and peoples died!11!"

Add into the mix the fact that the GOP voted to cut monies for embassy security before hand and their crocodile tears here are more transparent and pathetic than usual.

Insert chart showing number of embassy attacks and deaths under Bush here.

Aristocles: I must have missed the Fark.com thread about Obama hunting down the terrorists


Look at you pretending to care.

Here's me guessing that we never see you show up on "Inside the Actor's Studio".

Hunch thingy.
 
2013-09-21 08:18:15 PM

Aristocles: LeoffDaGrate: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

Are you still really trying to invent new nicknames and memes?  How's that goin' for ya?  Doesn't seem to be sticking.

But then again, you're probably just coming up with this stuff to increase the reply count so then you can complain about it, right?

Hil-dawg is from South Park
BOB is from Brick House
"Read a book sometime" is from another Farker

My only original contribution of late, that I know of, is "Jesus H.W. Christ," and I've been saying that for years.

Folks who are still harping on "potatoe" don't really have a lot of room to talk.


So who is Bob?
 
2013-09-21 08:19:11 PM

Mrtraveler01: It wasn't like this Youtube thing was made up out of thin air. That's why I find it stupid that people think the videomakers are somehow innocent.


Jesus H.W. Christ, you're actually holding the youtube douche responsible?

Are you from Canada or something? In America, we have this thing called the U.S. Constitution.

Read a book sometime.
 
2013-09-21 08:19:44 PM

Aristocles: BOB is from Brick House


So you're unable to tell us what BOB is?
 
2013-09-21 08:20:02 PM

quatchi: Insert chart showing number of embassy attacks and deaths under Bush here.


Non-American deaths don't count and are therefore voided, you're argument is invalid.
 
2013-09-21 08:20:50 PM

Aristocles: What's more pathetic, the fact that the GOP won't let Benghazi not be a thing, or the fact that Farklibs will give any old GOP/Benghazi thread 200+ comments?


You are responsible for about 3% of the activity here (and rising).  Does that mean that you are 3% Farklib?  Careful.  You might get primaried.
 
2013-09-21 08:23:08 PM
I'm BOB!
 
2013-09-21 08:25:43 PM
I don't get the Jesus H.W. Christ thing, either. It's not like Bush the elder was all that great.
 
2013-09-21 08:26:12 PM
Everyone knows who BOB is. BOB isn't going away anytime soon.

Just be thankful that "P-BO" didn't catch on.

/P-BOB?
 
2013-09-21 08:26:47 PM

Aristocles: LeoffDaGrate: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

Are you still really trying to invent new nicknames and memes?  How's that goin' for ya?  Doesn't seem to be sticking.

But then again, you're probably just coming up with this stuff to increase the reply count so then you can complain about it, right?

Hil-dawg is from South Park
BOB is from Brick House
"Read a book sometime" is from another Farker

My only original contribution of late, that I know of, is "Jesus H.W. Christ," and I've been saying that for years.

Folks who are still harping on "potatoe" don't really have a lot of room to talk.


HAHAHAHAHA you think the potato meme is about Dan Quayle.  farking priceless.
 
2013-09-21 08:26:49 PM

Aristocles: Everyone knows who BOB is. BOB isn't going away anytime soon.

Just be thankful that "P-BO" didn't catch on.

/P-BOB?


I know of no one in politics with those initials. Who's BOB? Or Bob. Bob Luntz maybe?
 
2013-09-21 08:27:28 PM

Aristocles: Mrtraveler01: It wasn't like this Youtube thing was made up out of thin air. That's why I find it stupid that people think the videomakers are somehow innocent.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you're actually holding the youtube douche responsible?

Are you from Canada or something? In America, we have this thing called the U.S. Constitution.

Read a book sometime.


He is absolutely free to make whatever movies he likes. He cannot however violate his parole. He did and that is why he got thrown back into the hoosegow. I don't understand why GOP apologists insist on white knighting a convicted felon.
 
2013-09-21 08:28:44 PM

Aristocles: Everyone knows who BOB is. BOB isn't going away anytime soon.

Just be thankful that "P-BO" didn't catch on.

/P-BOB?


I have no idea who Bob is. Could you please tell us?
 
2013-09-21 08:28:46 PM

thamike: sugardave: thamike: the_dude_abides: fun fact about the "exhaustive" benghazi ARB: state dept did not transcribe the interviews that were conducted. also, despite the fact that the house oversight committee has issued a subpoena demanding them, the state dept is not making the summaries of those interviews available. weird...

Yeah, weird.  Especially weird that anyone can google it and bang, there they are.

You just lost.  See, you thought you would be able to convince the troll to enlighten himself.  Now you just gave him another opportunity to say "prove it, I'm a lazy good-for-nothing information moocher."

I had no illusions about it.  I'm acquainted with his un-dude-like behavior.  I'm perfectly fine with merely letting the Unburdened with Proof generation expose themselves more than they meant to.  Obviously, not for their benefit.


Interestingly, he seems to have cut and ran.  Is he a secret liberal plant false flag?  Hmmm.
 
2013-09-21 08:30:07 PM

Mrtraveler01: It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.


They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.
 
2013-09-21 08:30:12 PM
This is a BOB:

moneysavingmom.com
 
2013-09-21 08:30:50 PM

freak7: They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand


[citation needed]
 
2013-09-21 08:32:07 PM

max_pooper: Aristocles: Mrtraveler01: It wasn't like this Youtube thing was made up out of thin air. That's why I find it stupid that people think the videomakers are somehow innocent.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you're actually holding the youtube douche responsible?

Are you from Canada or something? In America, we have this thing called the U.S. Constitution.

Read a book sometime.

He is absolutely free to make whatever movies he likes. He cannot however violate his parole. He did and that is why he got thrown back into the hoosegow. I don't understand why GOP apologists insist on white knighting a convicted felon.


And that's fine by me, just don't try to excuse the actions of Islamic radicals by saying the video maker has blood on his hands. I realize you weren't the one who said that, it was the guy to whom I was originally responding.
 
2013-09-21 08:33:33 PM

freak7: Mrtraveler01: It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.


Prove it.
 
2013-09-21 08:34:46 PM

Aristocles: max_pooper: Aristocles: Mrtraveler01: It wasn't like this Youtube thing was made up out of thin air. That's why I find it stupid that people think the videomakers are somehow innocent.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you're actually holding the youtube douche responsible?

Are you from Canada or something? In America, we have this thing called the U.S. Constitution.

Read a book sometime.

He is absolutely free to make whatever movies he likes. He cannot however violate his parole. He did and that is why he got thrown back into the hoosegow. I don't understand why GOP apologists insist on white knighting a convicted felon.

And that's fine by me, just don't try to excuse the actions of Islamic radicals by saying the video maker has blood on his hands. I realize you weren't the one who said that, it was the guy to whom I was originally responding.


The video sparked protests all over. Don't pretend like the protests about the video were some massive lie covering something up.
 
2013-09-21 08:35:52 PM

Mrtraveler01: Aristocles: BOB is from Brick House

So you're unable to tell us what BOB is?


It's a stupid thing he's trying to make a meme.  Just ignore it.
 
2013-09-21 08:38:00 PM

max_pooper: Aristocles: max_pooper: Aristocles: Mrtraveler01: It wasn't like this Youtube thing was made up out of thin air. That's why I find it stupid that people think the videomakers are somehow innocent.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you're actually holding the youtube douche responsible?

Are you from Canada or something? In America, we have this thing called the U.S. Constitution.

Read a book sometime.

He is absolutely free to make whatever movies he likes. He cannot however violate his parole. He did and that is why he got thrown back into the hoosegow. I don't understand why GOP apologists insist on white knighting a convicted felon.

And that's fine by me, just don't try to excuse the actions of Islamic radicals by saying the video maker has blood on his hands. I realize you weren't the one who said that, it was the guy to whom I was originally responding.

The video sparked protests all over. Don't pretend like the protests about the video were some massive lie covering something up.


The Obama administration set up massive protests at a bunch of embassies on the same day to cover up the fact that they let this thing happen.
 
2013-09-21 08:38:48 PM

Notabunny: Issa is no fool.


nope, he's a god... images1.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2013-09-21 08:39:10 PM

cameroncrazy1984: max_pooper: Aristocles: max_pooper: Aristocles: Mrtraveler01: It wasn't like this Youtube thing was made up out of thin air. That's why I find it stupid that people think the videomakers are somehow innocent.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you're actually holding the youtube douche responsible?

Are you from Canada or something? In America, we have this thing called the U.S. Constitution.

Read a book sometime.

He is absolutely free to make whatever movies he likes. He cannot however violate his parole. He did and that is why he got thrown back into the hoosegow. I don't understand why GOP apologists insist on white knighting a convicted felon.

And that's fine by me, just don't try to excuse the actions of Islamic radicals by saying the video maker has blood on his hands. I realize you weren't the one who said that, it was the guy to whom I was originally responding.

The video sparked protests all over. Don't pretend like the protests about the video were some massive lie covering something up.

The Obama administration set up massive protests at a bunch of embassies on the same day to cover up the fact that they let this thing happen.


That seems to be what the GOP apologists are insinuating.
 
2013-09-21 08:42:49 PM
Their "fact checking" would just get in his way.
 
2013-09-21 08:43:26 PM

notto: freak7: Mrtraveler01: It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.

Prove it.


U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad. Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

Read a book sometime.
 
2013-09-21 08:44:45 PM

Aristocles: notto: freak7: Mrtraveler01: It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.

Prove it.

U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad. Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

Read a book sometime.


That appears to say that they thought it was a protest at first and then later revised their opinion when they learned more about the attack, which is 100% true, and 100% the opposite of your claim.
 
2013-09-21 08:46:11 PM
Aristocles:

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.

Prove it.

U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad. Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."


How does that support your "they knew from the beginning".  You are moving the goal posts.  In fact, your source directly conflicts with your claim.    Way to go genius.
 
2013-09-21 08:46:23 PM

Aristocles: notto: freak7: Mrtraveler01: It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.

Prove it.

U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad. Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

Read a book sometime.


So, "as U.S. intel learned more 'we revised our initial assessment'" === "we knew weeks in advance" ?

What color is the sky in your fantasy land?
 
2013-09-21 08:46:54 PM

sugardave: This is a BOB:

[moneysavingmom.com image 430x291]


No, THIS is BOB.

3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-09-21 08:47:15 PM

cameroncrazy1984: That appears to say that they thought it was a protest at first and then later revised their opinion when they learned more about the attack, which is 100% true, and 100% the opposite of your claim.


They knew 5 minutes after the attack that it was an organized assault. Stop believing everything your side spoon feeds you. You're as bad as hardcore conservatives.
 
2013-09-21 08:48:02 PM

freak7: cameroncrazy1984: That appears to say that they thought it was a protest at first and then later revised their opinion when they learned more about the attack, which is 100% true, and 100% the opposite of your claim.

They knew 5 minutes after the attack that it was an organized assault. Stop believing everything your side spoon feeds you. You're as bad as hardcore conservatives.


Prove it.
 
2013-09-21 08:48:40 PM

theknuckler_33: sugardave: This is a BOB:

[moneysavingmom.com image 430x291]

No, THIS is BOB.

[3.bp.blogspot.com image 450x346]


My bad... this is a BOB:

ic.pics.livejournal.com
 
2013-09-21 08:51:14 PM

notto: freak7: cameroncrazy1984: That appears to say that they thought it was a protest at first and then later revised their opinion when they learned more about the attack, which is 100% true, and 100% the opposite of your claim.

They knew 5 minutes after the attack that it was an organized assault. Stop believing everything your side spoon feeds you. You're as bad as hardcore conservatives.

Prove it.


That you are as bad?  You just proved it to the world.
 
2013-09-21 08:51:35 PM

Notabunny: If this is how Republicans react when we elect an African-American, I can't wait to see what they do when we elect a Vagina-American.


it'll be even better if she's (part-anything) AND we still have a first lady... wanda sykes 4 prez!!
 
2013-09-21 08:51:46 PM

freak7: cameroncrazy1984: That appears to say that they thought it was a protest at first and then later revised their opinion when they learned more about the attack, which is 100% true, and 100% the opposite of your claim.

They knew 5 minutes after the attack that it was an organized assault. Stop believing everything your side spoon feeds you. You're as bad as hardcore conservatives.


And you got this information where?

Really, you have got to be the worst at this.
 
2013-09-21 08:53:15 PM

notto: Aristocles:

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.

Prove it.

U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad. Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

How does that support your "they knew from the beginning".  You are moving the goal posts.  In fact, your source directly conflicts with your claim.    Way to go genius.


Know how I know you didn't read the link?

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.
 
2013-09-21 08:54:01 PM

bigsteve3OOO: notto: freak7: cameroncrazy1984: That appears to say that they thought it was a protest at first and then later revised their opinion when they learned more about the attack, which is 100% true, and 100% the opposite of your claim.

They knew 5 minutes after the attack that it was an organized assault. Stop believing everything your side spoon feeds you. You're as bad as hardcore conservatives.

Prove it.

That you are as bad?  You just proved it to the world.


static.giantbomb.com
 
2013-09-21 08:56:04 PM
Aristocles:

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.

Sounds like a definite to me.

Quit making stuff up.
 
2013-09-21 08:57:36 PM

Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.

Prove it.

U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad. Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

How does that support your "they knew from the beginning".  You are moving the goal posts.  In fact, your source directly conflicts with your claim.    Way to go genius.

Know how I know you didn't read the link?

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.


Might have been?

Really? That's what your hanging this "scandal" on?
 
2013-09-21 08:58:22 PM

notto: Aristocles:

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.

Sounds like a definite to me.

Quit making stuff up.


Jesus H.W. Christ, you Farklibs are dense this evening.

It's from the SAME LINK! I'm quoting it, I'm not the author.
 
2013-09-21 08:59:52 PM

Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.

Sounds like a definite to me.

Quit making stuff up.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you Farklibs are dense this evening.

It's from the SAME LINK! I'm quoting it, I'm not the author.


What's a Farklib?
 
2013-09-21 09:00:03 PM

cynicalminion: Notabunny: If this is how Republicans react when we elect an African-American, I can't wait to see what they do when we elect a Vagina-American.

it'll be even better if she's (part-anything) AND we still have a first lady... wanda sykes 4 prez!!


Now I want her to run for President. If you think Obama drives the GOP nuts, I'd imagine an opinionated, foul mouthed black gay woman would make their brains ooze out of their ears.
 
2013-09-21 09:00:57 PM

KarmicDisaster: Yeah, what's this bob thing, some kind of new freeper/teaderp code word?


nah.  BOB, LISA, and CHANT are retail code...  Bottom of Basket, Look InSide Always, and Customers Have A Name Too.
 
2013-09-21 09:01:03 PM

Aristocles: Ricardo Klement: I am not sure why the Republican Party chose this strategy. If you wanted to maximize the political damage to the Democrats among independents, this isn't how you go about doing it. If you want to maximize energizing your base, you do this. This didn't really make sense during the election - GOP turnout is always pretty good. And, empirically, we lost the election. Was it the idea that money would win the election? It wasn't a bad bet, certainly from a Democrat perspective, because the Democratic Party has been rather upset that Citizens United would lose elections. Maybe the GOP thought the same thing, and opted for energizing the base. Once committed, they can't back down elegantly. Then again, some people might be positioning themselves for 2016. Maybe not the presidency, but a promotion to either leadership positions or to the Senate.

Except, what you're not realizing is the GOP isn't "trying to make Benghazi a thing." Obama himself said that he was going to hunt down those who were responsible.

I guess by "hunt down terrorists" he really meant "arrest a youtube d-bag."

Thanks, Obama!


You don't understand my objection. There were two ways of handling this: 1) maximize the actual culpability Obama has to face; 2) pretend this is the worst thing since the Holocaust. 1) would have been effective, but we would have to admit that it's not the worst thing in the last decade, much less the last century. We would have gotten more mileage with less noise. Instead, we stir this up so much, that we actually LOSE effectiveness. Not that this would have been a great scandal for the administration or anything, but at least we don't make him look like the victim of over-exuberant nonsense, but as an administration that could have done better.
 
2013-09-21 09:01:46 PM
I'm thinking that they should have dispatched Thunderbird 1 within 5 minutes, knowing that it was an organized attack. Being hypersonic, it could have arrived in an hour, and driven the attackers off by hovering over them or playing a video or something, That would have given time for Thunderbird 2 to load up with proper rescue equipment and SEALs, although it would take about 6 hours.
 
2013-09-21 09:02:07 PM

max_pooper: Might have been?

Really? That's what your hanging this "scandal" on?


Hey, they are republicans. 'might well have been planned' and  'may have been involved' are near certainties to those clowns. Hell it's a lot more than what Bush used to take us into Iraq.
 
2013-09-21 09:04:15 PM

FuryOfFirestorm: cynicalminion: Notabunny: If this is how Republicans react when we elect an African-American, I can't wait to see what they do when we elect a Vagina-American.

it'll be even better if she's (part-anything) AND we still have a first lady... wanda sykes 4 prez!!

Now I want her to run for President. If you think Obama drives the GOP nuts, I'd imagine an opinionated, foul mouthed black gay woman would make their brains ooze out of their ears.


especially with their twins...  :D
 
2013-09-21 09:05:05 PM
I almost feel sorry for the trolls in this thread. It's like watching the cool kids on the playground laugh at the dorky kid with a Kick Me sign on his back while he tries to fetch his underwear from the top of the flagpole.
 
2013-09-21 09:05:53 PM

Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.

Sounds like a definite to me.

Quit making stuff up.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you Farklibs are dense this evening.

It's from the SAME LINK! I'm quoting it, I'm not the author.


I know.  And it doesn't support the original claim that you are trying to support.  Do you understand the meaning of the words 'may' and 'might' compared to something as definite as a claim of 'They knew from the beginning '?

You are simply cherrypicking and ignoring what the rest of the article is telling you about what the intelligence community knew.
 
2013-09-21 09:08:31 PM

Aristocles: LeoffDaGrate: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

Are you still really trying to invent new nicknames and memes?  How's that goin' for ya?  Doesn't seem to be sticking.

But then again, you're probably just coming up with this stuff to increase the reply count so then you can complain about it, right?

Hil-dawg is from South Park
BOB is from Brick House
"Read a book sometime" is from another Farker

My only original contribution of late, that I know of, is "Jesus H.W. Christ," and I've been saying that for years.

Folks who are still harping on "potatoe" don't really have a lot of room to talk.


considering carving season has started, i want a potato harp.
 
2013-09-21 09:09:20 PM

notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.

Sounds like a definite to me.

Quit making stuff up.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you Farklibs are dense this evening.

It's from the SAME LINK! I'm quoting it, I'm not the author.

I know.  And it doesn't support the original claim that you are trying to support.  Do you understand the meaning of the words 'may' and 'might' compared to something as definite as a claim of 'They knew from the beginning '?

You are simply cherrypicking and ignoring what the rest of the article is telling you about what the intelligence community knew.


No. If that's what the BOB admin is willing to release, you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

BOB chose to spread the "youtube" lie in order to keep terrorism out of his campaign.

And you dem libs swallow every last drop of BOB's B.S.
 
2013-09-21 09:10:53 PM

Aristocles: notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.

Sounds like a definite to me.

Quit making stuff up.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you Farklibs are dense this evening.

It's from the SAME LINK! I'm quoting it, I'm not the author.

I know.  And it doesn't support the original claim that you are trying to support.  Do you understand the meaning of the words 'may' and 'might' compared to something as definite as a claim of 'They knew from the beginning '?

You are simply cherrypicking and ignoring what the rest of the article is telling you about what the intelligence community knew.

No. If that's what the BOB admin is willing to release, you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

BOB chose to spread the "youtube" lie in order to keep terrorism out of his campaign.

And you dem libs swallow every last drop of BOB's B.S.


Who is Bob?
 
2013-09-21 09:11:02 PM

Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.


No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.
 
2013-09-21 09:11:14 PM

freak7: notto: You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.

There are hundreds of sources showing who walked out, I'm not doing your research for you.


No one should in congressional or senate hearings, disrespect the witnesses.

s24.postimg.org
 
2013-09-21 09:13:09 PM

notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.


For the honor of American soldiers, why won't that troll account just quit making stuff up?
 
2013-09-21 09:13:49 PM

freak7: Lets hear some justification for the Democrats leaving the meeting before the family member of one of those killed testified.


Login:freak7Fark account number:873958Account created:2013-08-19 21:33:14
Aw....whose precious little alt are you?
 
2013-09-21 09:14:18 PM

notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.


every. last. drop.
 
2013-09-21 09:15:09 PM

Empty Matchbook: max_pooper: Satanic_Hamster: max_pooper: Satanic_Hamster: LarryDan43: I've had farts more important than what happened in Benghazi.

More people have died from me masturbating then died at Bengahzi.

People or kittens?

People.

That is some furious masturbation.

I know a guy who screwed up his knee so bad, he required a cane for a few years. This was caused, somehow, by masturbation, but he wouldn't go further into detail (it was one of those I don't wanna know...but I GOTTA KNOW situations). Some people are into some stuff...


i picture something like an accidental goldberg machine.  just about there, foot gets stuck, hits table leg, candle falls over, hot wax starts running.  emergency containment of wax leads to trip fall nekkid or in boxers, but yeah.  "Wireless Saves Lives!!"
 
2013-09-21 09:15:34 PM

Lionel Mandrake: themindiswatching: So Obama "murdered" the ambassador  how again?

Because he failed to authorize the use of warp-speed jets to fly to the area of attack and drop those super-smart bombs that only kill bad guys.  Study it out.


This.  That's exactly the kind of magical response scenario that the Retardlicans envisioned.
Either that, or pre-positioning a squad of Marines at the embassy, weapons loaded and ready, just in case such a thing happened...not just a handful of CIA...
 
2013-09-21 09:15:49 PM

Aristocles: notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.

Sounds like a definite to me.

Quit making stuff up.

Jesus H.W. Christ, you Farklibs are dense this evening.

It's from the SAME LINK! I'm quoting it, I'm not the author.

I know.  And it doesn't support the original claim that you are trying to support.  Do you understand the meaning of the words 'may' and 'might' compared to something as definite as a claim of 'They knew from the beginning '?

You are simply cherrypicking and ignoring what the rest of the article is telling you about what the intelligence community knew.

No. If that's what the BOB admin is willing to release, you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

BOB chose to spread the "youtube" lie in order to keep terrorism out of his campaign.

And you dem libs swallow every last drop of BOB's B.S.


As opposed to you, who is always riding some orange dude's Boehner?
 
2013-09-21 09:17:56 PM
Fark libs are as bad as the conservatives they're always biatching about, I think we've proven that in this thread.

The Obama administration screwed up with Benghazi, that's one thing we know for sure.
 
2013-09-21 09:18:39 PM

Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.

every. last. drop.


You've got nothing and everyone can see that.  Please.  Continue.  If you decide to provide anything that actually backs up your claims, I'll jump back in.  Until then, keep participating in this FarkLib thread.
 
2013-09-21 09:19:29 PM
vygramul:
Did the embassy get attacked?
Yes.
Was embassy security insufficient to repel the attack?
Yes.
Did four Americans get killed?
Yes.

No one is denying those. Soooooo...


Highlighted the important one.  Issa and company can't understand why an embassy is not a fortress, unless OBAMA specifically sabotaged it to ensure American deaths.
 
2013-09-21 09:19:56 PM

freak7: Fark libs are as bad as the conservatives they're always biatching about, I think we've proven that in this thread.

The Obama administration screwed up with Benghazi, that's one thing we know for sure.


There are hundreds of sources that have shown you are wrong.
 
2013-09-21 09:19:58 PM

freak7: Fark libs are as bad as the conservatives they're always biatching about, I think we've proven that in this thread.

The Obama administration screwed up with Benghazi, that's one thing we know for sure.


Please explain what you believe the Administration screwed up and provide citations for each claim.

We will wait patiently for your thuroughly sourced dissertation.
 
2013-09-21 09:21:06 PM

freak7: Mrtraveler01: It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.


Why do you think that is?

What did the CIA hope to gain by omitting that information to the public when they released those talking points to the Obama Administration?
 
2013-09-21 09:22:19 PM
You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

The constant attention you give him in no way guarantees he'll continue acting exactly like this until he gets bored of trolling you.

/personally I like BOB, I think it's decent little short hand and farking lightyears better than 0bama, but I guess it's forever ruined now
 
2013-09-21 09:22:24 PM

Aristocles: notto: freak7: Mrtraveler01: It was easily believable that the Benghazi attacks were because of the same thing when similar incidents happened throughout the Middle East and South Asia.

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.

Prove it.

U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad. Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

Read a book sometime.

i will NEVER believe anything spewed out of that show.
 
2013-09-21 09:22:42 PM

freak7: Fark libs are as bad as the conservatives they're always biatching about, I think we've proven that in this thread.

The Obama administration screwed up with Benghazi, that's one thing we know for sure.


Screwed up how?

Did they not take the threat as seriously as they should have? Probably.

Should it be treated as a learning experience? Definitely.

Outside of that, it seems the GOP is outraged that Obama didn't tell them what was happening fast enough.
 
2013-09-21 09:24:48 PM

notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.

every. last. drop.

You've got nothing and everyone can see that.  Please.  Continue.  If you decide to provide anything that actually backs up your claims, I'll jump back in.  Until then, keep participating in this FarkLib thread.


You, too, have nothing, my friend.

Also, what claim did I make that I couldn't back up? Re-read the thread.
 
2013-09-21 09:25:15 PM

js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

The constant attention you give him in no way guarantees he'll continue acting exactly like this until he gets bored of trolling you.

/personally I like BOB, I think it's decent little short hand and farking lightyears better than 0bama, but I guess it's forever ruined now


Hey look.  It's that guy.
 
2013-09-21 09:29:22 PM

FuryOfFirestorm: I almost feel sorry for the trolls in this thread. It's like watching the cool kids on the playground laugh at the dorky kid with a Kick Me sign on his back while he tries to fetch his underwear from the top of the flagpole.


even better, it's like santorum hit a deer and doesn't wanna fess up to those bein' his shorts (and skid marks) up there...
 
2013-09-21 09:29:47 PM

Aristocles: notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.

every. last. drop.

You've got nothing and everyone can see that.  Please.  Continue.  If you decide to provide anything that actually backs up your claims, I'll jump back in.  Until then, keep participating in this FarkLib thread.

You, too, have nothing, my friend.

Also, what claim did I make that I couldn't back up? Re-read the thread.


Well pretty much all of them but he glaring one is your insistance that Obama knew immediately that the attack had nothing to do with the other protests about the video and the only evidence you cited stated "might" and "maybe".

When this was pointed out to you, you doubled down and then went on some conspiracy tangent about how everyone some how knows it to be true but Administration is covering it up.

The best you've been able to muster so far is the lack of evidence of a massive cover up is the proof of a massive cover up. That doesn't fly those of us who live in the reality based community.
 
2013-09-21 09:31:40 PM

max_pooper: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.

every. last. drop.

You've got nothing and everyone can see that.  Please.  Continue.  If you decide to provide anything that actually backs up your claims, I'll jump back in.  Until then, keep participating in this FarkLib thread.

You, too, have nothing, my friend.

Also, what claim did I make that I couldn't back up? Re-read the thread.

Well pretty much all of them but he glaring one is your insistance that Obama knew immediately that the attack had nothing to do with the other protests about the video and the only evidence you cited stated "might" and "maybe".

When this was pointed out to you, you doubled down and then went on some conspiracy tangent about how everyone some how knows it to be true but Administration is covering it up.

The best you've been able to muster so far is the lack of evidence of a massive cover up is the proof of a massive cover up. That doesn't fly those of us who live in the reality based community.


I never made that claim.
 
2013-09-21 09:31:45 PM

max_pooper: The best you've been able to muster so far is the lack of evidence of a massive cover up is the proof of a massive cover up


This is usually the thought process when it comes to Conservatives.

/See also: Voter Fraud
 
2013-09-21 09:35:17 PM

Mrtraveler01: max_pooper: The best you've been able to muster so far is the lack of evidence of a massive cover up is the proof of a massive cover up

This is usually the thought process when it comes to Conservatives.

/See also: Voter Fraud


I'm still unsure exactly what the mouthbreathers believe is being covered up.
 
2013-09-21 09:35:49 PM
The Battle of Britain did not take place in Libya.

i42.tinypic.com

Get your history straight people!
 
2013-09-21 09:37:56 PM

js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.


I know the last ten ACME products have backfired, but these rocket skates are foolproof!
 
2013-09-21 09:40:54 PM

Mentat: js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

I know the last ten ACME products have backfired, but these rocket skates are foolproof!


That's rich, coming from a Farklib.

Hey Farklibs? What about that whole "hunt down those responsible" mess that BOB promised? I'm still waiting for the Fark.com link to the article that details how BOB hunted down the terrorists.... well?

*crickets*
 
2013-09-21 09:41:25 PM

Aristocles: max_pooper: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.

every. last. drop.

You've got nothing and everyone can see that.  Please.  Continue.  If you decide to provide anything that actually backs up your claims, I'll jump back in.  Until then, keep participating in this FarkLib thread.

You, too, have nothing, my friend.

Also, what claim did I make that I couldn't back up? Re-read the thread.

Well pretty much all of them but he glaring one is your insistance that Obama knew immediately that the attack had nothing to do with the other protests about the video and the only evidence you cited stated "might" and "maybe".

When this was pointed out to you, you doubled down and then went on some conspiracy tangent about how everyone some how knows it to be true but Administration is covering it up.

The best you've been able to muster so far is the lack of evidence of a massive cover up is the proof of a massive cover up. That doesn't fly those of us who live in the reality based community.

I never made that claim.


You claimed some guy named Bob was part of some sort of conspiracy. Here's your quote:

"No. If that's what the BOB admin is willing to release, you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

Who is Bob?
 
2013-09-21 09:42:12 PM

Aristocles: Mentat: js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

I know the last ten ACME products have backfired, but these rocket skates are foolproof!

That's rich, coming from a Farklib.

Hey Farklibs? What about that whole "hunt down those responsible" mess that BOB promised? I'm still waiting for the Fark.com link to the article that details how BOB hunted down the terrorists.... well?

*crickets*


What's a Farklib? Who is Bob?
 
2013-09-21 09:42:28 PM
Straw Grasping trip to Libya.


....wasn't there a funny poll from just awhile back in which a significant number of Republican politicians couldn't find Benghazi on a map?   ...or didn't even know what country?
 
2013-09-21 09:43:58 PM

freak7: Fark libs are as bad as the conservatives they're always biatching about, I think we've proven that in this thread.

The Obama administration screwed up with Benghazi, that's one thing we know for sure.


nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...
 
2013-09-21 09:45:26 PM

max_pooper: Aristocles: max_pooper: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.

every. last. drop.

You've got nothing and everyone can see that.  Please.  Continue.  If you decide to provide anything that actually backs up your claims, I'll jump back in.  Until then, keep participating in this FarkLib thread.

You, too, have nothing, my friend.

Also, what claim did I make that I couldn't back up? Re-read the thread.

Well pretty much all of them but he glaring one is your insistance that Obama knew immediately that the attack had nothing to do with the other protests about the video and the only evidence you cited stated "might" and "maybe".

When this was pointed out to you, you doubled down and then went on some conspiracy tangent about how everyone some how knows it to be true but Administration is covering it up.

The best you've been able to muster so far is the lack of evidence of a massive cover up is the proof of a massive cover up. That doesn't fly those of us who live in the reality based community.

I never made that claim.

You claimed some guy named Bob was part of some sort of conspiracy. Here's your quote:

"No. If that's what the BOB admin is willing to release, you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

Who is Bob?


Right, and I based that claim off an article that said as much. Did you read the article?

Here's an excerpt: "Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance"
 
2013-09-21 09:46:35 PM

cynicalminion: nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...


How about the guy that wants to bomb Syria?
 
2013-09-21 09:47:55 PM

KarmicDisaster: I'm BOB!


I am BOB.
 
2013-09-21 09:48:02 PM

freak7: cynicalminion: nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...

How about the guy that wanted to bomb Syria?


FTFY

You really need to refresh your browser. It's apparently stuck from 2 weeks ago.
 
2013-09-21 09:49:00 PM

Mrtraveler01: freak7: cynicalminion: nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...

How about the guy that wanted to bomb Syria?

FTFY

You really need to refresh your browser. It's apparently stuck from 2 weeks ago.


He might me talking about John McCain.
 
2013-09-21 09:49:06 PM

Aristocles: max_pooper: Aristocles: max_pooper: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:  you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned.

No.  We don't. And you have providing nothing that demonstrates otherwise.  Quit making stuff up.

every. last. drop.

You've got nothing and everyone can see that.  Please.  Continue.  If you decide to provide anything that actually backs up your claims, I'll jump back in.  Until then, keep participating in this FarkLib thread.

You, too, have nothing, my friend.

Also, what claim did I make that I couldn't back up? Re-read the thread.

Well pretty much all of them but he glaring one is your insistance that Obama knew immediately that the attack had nothing to do with the other protests about the video and the only evidence you cited stated "might" and "maybe".

When this was pointed out to you, you doubled down and then went on some conspiracy tangent about how everyone some how knows it to be true but Administration is covering it up.

The best you've been able to muster so far is the lack of evidence of a massive cover up is the proof of a massive cover up. That doesn't fly those of us who live in the reality based community.

I never made that claim.

You claimed some guy named Bob was part of some sort of conspiracy. Here's your quote:

"No. If that's what the BOB admin is willing to release, you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

Who is Bob?

Right, and I based that claim off an article that said as much. Did you read the article?

Here's an excerpt: "Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance"


You said "you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

So you claim to "know damn well" while your cited evidence only says "might".

Do you not understand why this makes you look like a total moran?

Also, who is Bob?
 
2013-09-21 09:49:29 PM

max_pooper: Aristocles: Mentat: js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

I know the last ten ACME products have backfired, but these rocket skates are foolproof!

That's rich, coming from a Farklib.

Hey Farklibs? What about that whole "hunt down those responsible" mess that BOB promised? I'm still waiting for the Fark.com link to the article that details how BOB hunted down the terrorists.... well?

*crickets*

What's a Farklib? Who is Bob?


Who put the bomp in the bomp bah bomp bah bomp ?
 
2013-09-21 09:52:38 PM

freak7: cynicalminion: nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...

How about the guy that wants to bomb Syria?


which one? 

they also need to take a step back...  humanity is in a really dangerous spot.

it's been common knowledge for YEARS that the middle east is a hotbed...  can we stop poking badgers with sticks?
 
2013-09-21 09:53:13 PM

max_pooper: You said "you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

So you claim to "know damn well" while your cited evidence only says "might".

Do you not understand why this makes you look like a total moran?

Also, who is Bob?


Here. I'll explain for you.

"You and I know damn well" referred to the fact that BOB's people were telling him that the attacks were planned. "Might" refers to the content of what BOB's people said.

/reading comprehension, how does it work?
 
2013-09-21 09:54:48 PM

freak7: cynicalminion: nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...

How about the guy that wants to bomb Syria?


McCain?
 
2013-09-21 09:54:52 PM

Aristocles: max_pooper: You said "you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

So you claim to "know damn well" while your cited evidence only says "might".

Do you not understand why this makes you look like a total moran?

Also, who is Bob?

Here. I'll explain for you.

"You and I know damn well" referred to the fact that BOB's people were telling him that the attacks were planned. "Might" refers to the content of what BOB's people said.

/reading comprehension, how does it work?


The Enzyte people?

What do the boner pill people have anything to do with this?
 
2013-09-21 09:55:14 PM

Mrtraveler01: max_pooper: Aristocles: Mentat: js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

I know the last ten ACME products have backfired, but these rocket skates are foolproof!

That's rich, coming from a Farklib.

Hey Farklibs? What about that whole "hunt down those responsible" mess that BOB promised? I'm still waiting for the Fark.com link to the article that details how BOB hunted down the terrorists.... well?

*crickets*

What's a Farklib? Who is Bob?

Who put the bomp in the bomp bah bomp bah bomp ?


who put the ram in the ramalamadingdong?
 
2013-09-21 09:55:40 PM

cynicalminion: freak7: cynicalminion: nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...

How about the guy that wants to bomb Syria?

which one? 

they also need to take a step back...  humanity is in a really dangerous spot.

it's been common knowledge for YEARS that the middle east is a hotbed...  can we stop poking badgers with sticks?


I know, right?! Let's just let them sarinade each other into oblivion! Because, fark 'em!
 
2013-09-21 10:00:13 PM

Repo Man: The Battle of Britain did not take place in Libya.

[i42.tinypic.com image 483x689]

Get your history straight people!


WRONG BOB GAME, you farker.

upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-09-21 10:02:16 PM

Fart_Machine: Mrtraveler01: freak7: cynicalminion: nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...

How about the guy that wanted to bomb Syria?

FTFY

You really need to refresh your browser. It's apparently stuck from 2 weeks ago.

He might me talking about John McCain.


john mccain understands the internet?  *gasp* my world is shattered....
 
2013-09-21 10:02:34 PM

Aristocles: max_pooper: You said "you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

So you claim to "know damn well" while your cited evidence only says "might".

Do you not understand why this makes you look like a total moran?

Also, who is Bob?

Here. I'll explain for you.

"You and I know damn well" referred to the fact that BOB's people were telling him that the attacks were planned. "Might" refers to the content of what BOB's people said.

/reading comprehension, how does it work?


So you "damn well know" nothing?

Either the Administration, as you claim to "damn well know", imediately and definitively knew that the attack had nothing to do with the video protests happening elsewhere at the same time or they were not sure as your cited evidence claims.

I'm not really sure why you keep doubling down on a claim that you keep citing evidence that shows you to be wrong. Is it stupidity or stubbornness? I guess it could be both.

Also, why do ou keeping talking about this Bob guy, who is he?
 
2013-09-21 10:03:50 PM

Ishidan: Issa and company can't understand why an embassy is not a fortress, unless OBAMA specifically sabotaged it to ensure American deaths.


Which is funny, because, IIRC, the State Department asked Congress for more money for Embassy security, and got turned down by the (R)s.
 
2013-09-21 10:04:20 PM

Mrtraveler01: You really need to refresh your browser. It's apparently stuck from 2 weeks ago.


You think Obama still doesn't want strikes in Syria? That's cute.
 
2013-09-21 10:08:17 PM

freak7: Mrtraveler01: You really need to refresh your browser. It's apparently stuck from 2 weeks ago.

You think Obama still doesn't want strikes in Syria? That's cute.


We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

I know youre busy researching those claims but do us a favor and find some evidence that Obama, who has diplomatcally avoided military strikes in Syria, wants military strikes in Syria. Thanks.
 
2013-09-21 10:09:11 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Repo Man: The Battle of Britain did not take place in Libya.

[i42.tinypic.com image 483x689]

Get your history straight people!

WRONG BOB GAME, you farker.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 256x326]


That was a farking fantastic game.
 
2013-09-21 10:09:57 PM

Mrtraveler01: max_pooper: Aristocles: Mentat: js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

I know the last ten ACME products have backfired, but these rocket skates are foolproof!

That's rich, coming from a Farklib.

Hey Farklibs? What about that whole "hunt down those responsible" mess that BOB promised? I'm still waiting for the Fark.com link to the article that details how BOB hunted down the terrorists.... well?

*crickets*

What's a Farklib? Who is Bob?

Who put the bomp in the bomp bah bomp bah bomp ?


i1.ytimg.com
 
2013-09-21 10:10:32 PM

max_pooper: Aristocles: max_pooper: You said "you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

So you claim to "know damn well" while your cited evidence only says "might".

Do you not understand why this makes you look like a total moran?

Also, who is Bob?

Here. I'll explain for you.

"You and I know damn well" referred to the fact that BOB's people were telling him that the attacks were planned. "Might" refers to the content of what BOB's people said.

/reading comprehension, how does it work?

So you "damn well know" nothing?

Either the Administration, as you claim to "damn well know", imediately and definitively knew that the attack had nothing to do with the video protests happening elsewhere at the same time or they were not sure as your cited evidence claims.

I'm not really sure why you keep doubling down on a claim that you keep citing evidence that shows you to be wrong. Is it stupidity or stubbornness? I guess it could be both.

Also, why do ou keeping talking about this Bob guy, who is he?


Look, I understand you deflection. Heck, if I'd voted for a guy who swore he'd hunt down the terrorists who killed 4 Americans and over a year later no progress had been made, I'd be pretty upset.

I see it's a sore spot for you. But, hey, you were warned about voting for BOB.
 
2013-09-21 10:12:00 PM

Ricardo Klement: That was a farking fantastic game.


One of the top games of all time, or at least of the pre-pentium era.  That and Wing Commander/II.
 
2013-09-21 10:12:45 PM

max_pooper: freak7: Mrtraveler01: You really need to refresh your browser. It's apparently stuck from 2 weeks ago.

You think Obama still doesn't want strikes in Syria? That's cute.

We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

I know youre busy researching those claims but do us a favor and find some evidence that

Obama, who has diplomatcally avoided military strikes in Syria, wants military strikes in Syria. Thanks.

Ah, trolling, I see. You had me going for a while, I'll give you that. Anyway, carry on.
 
2013-09-21 10:13:52 PM

notto: js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

The constant attention you give him in no way guarantees he'll continue acting exactly like this until he gets bored of trolling you.

/personally I like BOB, I think it's decent little short hand and farking lightyears better than 0bama, but I guess it's forever ruined now

Hey look.  It's that guy.


Hey look it's that guy that got trolled. But he totally called him out on it!
 
2013-09-21 10:18:16 PM
Speaking of Terrorists Attacks/Acts of Terror:

Did Fark ever green light a thread about the terror attack at the Mall in Nairobi earlier today?

That thing was farking tragic.
 
2013-09-21 10:18:25 PM
STOP GIVING THE ATTENTION WHORE THE ATTENTION HE WANTS.

/that is all
 
2013-09-21 10:20:17 PM

Aristocles: max_pooper: freak7: Mrtraveler01: You really need to refresh your browser. It's apparently stuck from 2 weeks ago.

You think Obama still doesn't want strikes in Syria? That's cute.

We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

I know youre busy researching those claims but do us a favor and find some evidence that Obama, who has diplomatcally avoided military strikes in Syria, wants military strikes in Syria. Thanks.

Ah, trolling, I see. You had me going for a while, I'll give you that. Anyway, carry on.


Trolling? So you are saying that last week the Obama administration did not make an agreement to disarm Assad of his chemical weapons without having to strike Syria?

How could I have missed this? Surely the US bombing Syria would have made the news. Was there a fark thread about it?

I guess they could have done it secretly like when they immediately told Obama that the Bengahzi attack had nothing to do with the video protests occurring elsewhere at the same time without leaving any evidence what so ever.
 
2013-09-21 10:21:59 PM

Mrtraveler01: Speaking of Terrorists Attacks/Acts of Terror:

Did Fark ever green light a thread about the terror attack at the Mall in Nairobi earlier today?

That thing was farking tragic.


I haven't heard Obama say anything about it either.

And, where is Nairobi? That's right, Kenya.

And where was Obama born? That's right, Kenya.

What did Obama know and when did he know it?

Read a book once in a while, libulardos.
 
2013-09-21 10:22:35 PM

max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.


Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.
 
2013-09-21 10:23:10 PM

js34603: notto: js34603: You've got him this time guys. You're really going to get him to admit he's a troll and make him disappear forever. If you just ask him a few more obvious questions, I'm sure that he'll cave and won't continue to move goal posts, use circular arguments and refuse to engage in real debate.

The constant attention you give him in no way guarantees he'll continue acting exactly like this until he gets bored of trolling you.

/personally I like BOB, I think it's decent little short hand and farking lightyears better than 0bama, but I guess it's forever ruined now

Hey look.  It's that guy.

Hey look it's that guy that got trolled. But he totally called him out on it!


Yeah. You are the only one who realizes he's a troll. You are so above us. You're that guy.
 
2013-09-21 10:23:46 PM

Aristocles: max_pooper: Aristocles: max_pooper: You said "you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

So you claim to "know damn well" while your cited evidence only says "might".

Do you not understand why this makes you look like a total moran?

Also, who is Bob?

Here. I'll explain for you.

"You and I know damn well" referred to the fact that BOB's people were telling him that the attacks were planned. "Might" refers to the content of what BOB's people said.

/reading comprehension, how does it work?

So you "damn well know" nothing?

Either the Administration, as you claim to "damn well know", imediately and definitively knew that the attack had nothing to do with the video protests happening elsewhere at the same time or they were not sure as your cited evidence claims.

I'm not really sure why you keep doubling down on a claim that you keep citing evidence that shows you to be wrong. Is it stupidity or stubbornness? I guess it could be both.

Also, why do ou keeping talking about this Bob guy, who is he?

Look, I understand you deflection. Heck, if I'd voted for a guy who swore he'd hunt down the terrorists who killed 4 Americans and over a year later no progress had been made, I'd be pretty upset.

I see it's a sore spot for you. But, hey, you were warned about voting for BOB.


It took the Obama administration over 2 years to get Bin Laden.

I guess you must have been livid that Bush 7 spent seven years not finding him.

Again, who is Bob guy you keep talking about.
 
2013-09-21 10:25:23 PM

Aristocles: cynicalminion: freak7: cynicalminion: nope, pretty sure whoever decided the US belonged in Benghazi has that trophy...

How about the guy that wants to bomb Syria?

which one? 

they also need to take a step back...  humanity is in a really dangerous spot.

it's been common knowledge for YEARS that the middle east is a hotbed...  can we stop poking badgers with sticks?

I know, right?! Let's just let them sarinade each other into oblivion! Because, fark 'em!


it's "serenade" unless you're referring to chemical warfare, at which point the un needs a kick in the arse...  sorry if i don't believe the us should be the world police.
 
2013-09-21 10:25:23 PM

freak7: max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.


Read every post. I haven't see you post any evidence at all.
 
2013-09-21 10:26:12 PM

freak7: max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.


Which part of the thread are you referring to? The parts where you bring up Faux News talking points and are continually showed to be wrong?
 
2013-09-21 10:27:07 PM

MaudlinMutantMollusk: How much money you wasting on this bullsh*t, Issa?

/you worthless crooked POS


Less than would be wasted if he invited Democrats along.  Why bother inviting people to investigate an incident who have already decided that there is nothing to investigate?
 
2013-09-21 10:27:37 PM

grumpfuff: STOP GIVING THE ATTENTION WHORE THE ATTENTION HE WANTS.
/that is all


This is the type of attention he wants.
 
2013-09-21 10:28:46 PM

Shaggy_C: MaudlinMutantMollusk: How much money you wasting on this bullsh*t, Issa?

/you worthless crooked POS

Less than would be wasted if he invited Democrats along.  Why bother inviting people to investigate an incident who have already decided that there is nothing to investigate?


That's why Issa kicked the dens out of the hearings. Study it out.
 
2013-09-21 10:29:51 PM

SurfaceTension: King Something: SilentStrider: What are the odds he finds any actual facts?

I'd wager it's about as likely as me voluntarily eating a Chicago-style pizza.

/New Yorker
//Brooklynite

Well, Chicago style IS better


is not

/infinity
 
2013-09-21 10:29:54 PM

Ricardo Klement: Satanic_Hamster: Repo Man: The Battle of Britain did not take place in Libya.

[i42.tinypic.com image 483x689]

Get your history straight people!

WRONG BOB GAME, you farker.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 256x326]

That was a farking fantastic game.


commas definitely AWOL

"get your history, straight people"
vs
"get your history straight, people"

two VERY different problems.
/snap for option a)
 
2013-09-21 10:32:32 PM

Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.


The GOP shows they care by politicizing the dead by trying to make it a scandal, even against overwhelming evidence that it is not.
 
2013-09-21 10:32:41 PM

Aristocles: Heck, if I'd voted for a guy who swore he'd hunt down the terrorists who killed 4 Americans and over a year later no progress had been made, I'd be pretty upset.


I'm sure you held Bush to the same exacting standards.

*rolls eyes*
 
2013-09-21 10:33:43 PM

freak7: Mrtraveler01: You really need to refresh your browser. It's apparently stuck from 2 weeks ago.

You think Obama still doesn't want strikes in Syria? That's cute.

max_pooper: Aristocles: max_pooper: You said "you and I both know damn well that BOB's people were telling him from the beginning that this was planned."

So you claim to "know damn well" while your cited evidence only says "might".

Do you not understand why this makes you look like a total moran?

Also, who is Bob?

Here. I'll explain for you.

"You and I know damn well" referred to the fact that BOB's people were telling him that the attacks were planned. "Might" refers to the content of what BOB's people said.

/reading comprehension, how does it work?

So you "damn well know" nothing?

Either the Administration, as you claim to "damn well know", imediately and definitively knew that the attack had nothing to do with the video protests happening elsewhere at the same time or they were not sure as your cited evidence claims.

I'm not really sure why you keep doubling down on a claim that you keep citing evidence that shows you to be wrong. Is it stupidity or stubbornness? I guess it could be both.

Also, why do ou keeping talking about this Bob guy, who is he?


ya know, bob dole, the guy who makes the pineapples that get lost in the tunnels.
 
2013-09-21 10:34:23 PM

max_pooper: freak7: max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.

Read every post. I haven't see you post any evidence at all.


The lack of evidence is the evidence!
 
2013-09-21 10:37:17 PM

freak7: Fark libs are as bad as the conservatives they're always biatching about, I think we've proven that in this thread.

The Obama administration screwed up with Benghazi, that's one thing we know for sure.


By doing what, exactly?
 
2013-09-21 10:37:42 PM
max_pooper:
Again, who is Bob guy you keep talking about.

Guardian 452, currently of the Mainframe system.

images4.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2013-09-21 10:39:18 PM

freak7: max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.


All I see in this thread are a few folks spewing contempt for anyone trying to state facts about what happened in Benghazi.
 
2013-09-21 10:39:26 PM

Ishidan: max_pooper:
Again, who is Bob guy you keep talking about.

Guardian 452, currently of the Mainframe system.


Is he the guy that rides a motorcycle inside a computer?
 
2013-09-21 10:40:19 PM

quatchi: Aristocles: Heck, if I'd voted for a guy who swore he'd hunt down the terrorists who killed 4 Americans and over a year later no progress had been made, I'd be pretty upset.

I'm sure you held Bush to the same exacting standards.

*rolls eyes*


http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2013/09/18/fbi-barred-from-making-beng ha zi-arrests-in-libya/?hpt=hp_t3

Maybe he thinks it is a good idea to put more Americans in harms way to make the arrest(s) and doing so without some sort of agreement with the Libyan government.
 
2013-09-21 10:41:58 PM

Zeppelininthesky: freak7: max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.

All I see in this thread are a few folks spewing contempt for anyone trying to state facts about what happened in Benghazi.


They don't need facts because they know in their gut that this is a big damn conspiracy despite all evidence to the contrary.
 
2013-09-21 10:42:30 PM
I still don't get why any of this is a scandal, except for one thing

A youtube video comes out and sparks a bunch of violent protests.
Meanwhile, the Benghazi embassy is attacked and 4 people killed
right after Republicans voted to cut embassy security funding <---- **scandal**
attacks were initially believed to be part of the youtube protests
Memos blamed it on the protests even after possibly knowing it was a preplanned attack  <---either lack of info or as to not tip off the suspects
but they were corrected as more info came in.

...if only the Benghazi attackers were caught as quickly as Bin Laden.  Oh wait, nvm.

Also something about democrats walking out on a hearing that even more Republicans walked out on.
And Issa going halfway around the world on a Benghazi "fact finding" mission without ever setting foot in Benghazi.
 
2013-09-21 10:43:02 PM

Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.


Whos Bob?
 
2013-09-21 10:43:26 PM

GWSuperfan: Ishidan: Issa and company can't understand why an embassy is not a fortress, unless OBAMA specifically sabotaged it to ensure American deaths.

Which is funny, because, IIRC, the State Department asked Congress for more money for Embassy security, and got turned down by the (R)s.


And Obama let the Republicans refuse to fortify the embassy, therefore and poor leader such as impeach.
 
2013-09-21 10:45:04 PM

max_pooper: Zeppelininthesky: freak7: max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.

All I see in this thread are a few folks spewing contempt for anyone trying to state facts about what happened in Benghazi.

They don't need facts because they know in their gut that this is a big damn conspiracy despite all evidence to the contrary.


Facts are not for "Real Americans"
 
2013-09-21 10:45:57 PM

CourtroomWolf: I still don't get why any of this is a scandal, except for one thing

A youtube video comes out and sparks a bunch of violent protests.
Meanwhile, the Benghazi embassy is attacked and 4 people killed
right after Republicans voted to cut embassy security funding <---- **scandal**
attacks were initially believed to be part of the youtube protests
Memos blamed it on the protests even after possibly knowing it was a preplanned attack  <---either lack of info or as to not tip off the suspects
but they were corrected as more info came in.

...if only the Benghazi attackers were caught as quickly as Bin Laden.  Oh wait, nvm.

Also something about democrats walking out on a hearing that even more Republicans walked out on.
And Issa going halfway around the world on a Benghazi "fact finding" mission without ever setting foot in Benghazi.


Basically, they're still sore that Obama won the election and the Benghazi truthers think that this should've meant that Obama should've lost the election, regardless of the fact that Mitt Romney was a walking disaster when it came to foreign policy.

If Obama and the CIA came out and called it a terror attack earlier, what would have changed exactly?
 
2013-09-21 10:47:08 PM

Aristocles: Heck, if I'd voted for a guy who swore he'd hunt down the terrorists who killed 4 Americans and over a year later no progress had been made, I'd be pretty upset.

[citation needed]


let me take a look at where the elections involved anyone hunting down the benghazi terrorists? .

also, i'm pretty sure you DIDN'T vote for him, so go handcuff the people responsible.  i'm sure we'll sleep better at night.

and "no progress has been made?"  are you for serious reals right now? witness the obstructionist shiat going down in congress first...
 
2013-09-21 10:47:11 PM

Mrtraveler01: CourtroomWolf: I still don't get why any of this is a scandal, except for one thing

A youtube video comes out and sparks a bunch of violent protests.
Meanwhile, the Benghazi embassy is attacked and 4 people killed
right after Republicans voted to cut embassy security funding <---- **scandal**
attacks were initially believed to be part of the youtube protests
Memos blamed it on the protests even after possibly knowing it was a preplanned attack  <---either lack of info or as to not tip off the suspects
but they were corrected as more info came in.

...if only the Benghazi attackers were caught as quickly as Bin Laden.  Oh wait, nvm.

Also something about democrats walking out on a hearing that even more Republicans walked out on.
And Issa going halfway around the world on a Benghazi "fact finding" mission without ever setting foot in Benghazi.

Basically, they're still sore that Obama won the election and the Benghazi truthers think that this should've meant that Obama should've lost the election, regardless of the fact that Mitt Romney was a walking disaster when it came to foreign policy.

If Obama and the CIA came out and called it a terror attack earlier, what would have changed exactly?


Stuff such as things and such.
 
2013-09-21 10:49:29 PM

Aristocles: Heck, if I'd voted for a guy who swore he'd hunt down the terrorists who killed 4 Americans and over a year later no progress had been made, I'd be pretty upset.

I see it's a sore spot for you. But, hey, you were warned about voting for BOB.


Did you vote for Bush? I seem to remember some guy that killed a bunch of people and Bush gave up looking for him.
 
2013-09-21 10:51:44 PM

theknuckler_33: Mrtraveler01: Speaking of Terrorists Attacks/Acts of Terror:

Did Fark ever green light a thread about the terror attack at the Mall in Nairobi earlier today?

That thing was farking tragic.

I haven't heard Obama say anything about it either.

And, where is Nairobi? That's right, Kenya.

And where was Obama born? That's right, Kenya.

What did Obama know and when did he know it?

Read a book once in a while, libulardos.


where do you go to see lions?
where do you go to see tigers?
where do you go to see bears?
(BIOLOGICAL MEN ONLY BATHROOM) (warning, if you use the urinals, you WILL be filmed) "ONLY IN THE REPUBLICANS"
 
2013-09-21 10:53:49 PM

Ishidan: max_pooper:
Again, who is Bob guy you keep talking about.

Guardian 452, currently of the Mainframe system.

[images4.wikia.nocookie.net image 640x480]


like you never wanted hexadecimal to spank you...
 
2013-09-21 10:55:51 PM

notto: freak7: Abner Doon: The sum total of the scandal then, is that they were initially wrong about what caused people to attack the embassy, and that they didn't immediately make public every possible thing they knew?  And that seems like a real scandal to you people? Wow.

I'm not saying it's some huge scandal on the level that some republicans would have you believe. I'm pointing out the other sides inability to accept that mistakes were made. Almost everybody on Fark rips on conservatives for their blind hatred of all things Obama while they do the same goddamn thing by not being able to admit that their side farks up once in a while. They obviously made mistakes related to Benghazi, lets here the Obama flock admit that.

You mean like this?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57584921/officials-on-benghazi-w e- made-mistakes-but-without-malice/

Now do you see why this is not considered a scandal?

Now do you see why everyone laughs at the side that won't admit that it is not a scandal?


The attention he wanted. Look you got a link and everything, I'm sure he's almost convinced.
 
2013-09-21 10:57:02 PM

notto: freak7: Blame the White House for their refusal to admit that mistakes were made.

They admitted that mistakes were made.  You really should keep up.


The attention he wanted. You really told him though, I'm sure he will make a concerted effort to keep up from now on.
 
2013-09-21 10:58:11 PM

notto: freak7: I bet it just blows most of your minds that Boehner agrees with Obama about Syria, doesn't it?

Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?  This thread is about the non-scandal of Benghazi.


The attention he wanted. He can't possibly ignore the brilliant trap you laid for him here!
 
2013-09-21 11:00:49 PM

CourtroomWolf: Memos blamed it on the protests even after possibly knowing it was a preplanned attack <---either lack of info or as to not tip off the suspects
but they were corrected as more info came in.


This is the key. This is nonsense to the nutters. If they knew or even suspected it was a preplanned attack, repeating on the Sunday news programs the protest talking points is an outrageous lie and not just repeating what we thought before until what we think we know now is confirmed. This lie was entirely politically motivated because either the American people would have thought that a preplanned attack that killed 4 Americans was so much worse than a violent protest that killed 4 Americans that it would have swayed the election *OR* Obama at least thought that might be the case precipitating the need to tell that outrageous lie.

Now, you sprinkle in the side conspiracy theories that some people buy into and others don't... the 'stand down' order and/or the supposed inaction of Obama that made things worse than they would have otherwise been. Or worse... the whole gun-running to Syrian rebels is why Stevens was in Benghazi or any other after-the-fact complaints like the ARB was biased and complicit in covering up what 'really' happened.  It's kinda hard to nail down individual folks... they just throw all kinds of shiat at the wall and sum it up with some kind of general statement like "Obama screwed up" and if you bother to call them on their shennanigans, you end up being dragged down the rabbit hole of derp until you have to give yourself an I.V. of Tullamore Dew to actually heal your brain from how much damage arguing with the morans has inflicted.
 
2013-09-21 11:01:01 PM

notto: freak7: notto: 18.

Prove it.

You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.

If we are just going to look at pictures, we can start here.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/09/20/these-pictures-prove-fox-is-l y ing-democrats-did/196000


Definitely the attention he wanted. You've cornered him now, he's going to have to provide evidence!

/you spent half the thread responding to trolls and got butthurt when it was pointed out
//tip: don't respond to trolls, start with me, I'm not reading it anyway
 
2013-09-21 11:07:03 PM

js34603: notto: freak7: notto: 18.

Prove it.

You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.

If we are just going to look at pictures, we can start here.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/09/20/these-pictures-prove-fox-is-l y ing-democrats-did/196000

Definitely the attention he wanted. You've cornered him now, he's going to have to provide evidence!

/you spent half the thread responding to trolls and got butthurt when it was pointed out
//tip: don't respond to trolls, start with me, I'm not reading it anyway


I'm here to complain about the guy complaining about the guy responding to Neighborhood Watch's alt.

meta
 
2013-09-21 11:18:50 PM
 
2013-09-21 11:21:52 PM

freak7: max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.


uh, no, actually, i still want to see what exactly obama did wrong if he was EVER in benghazi...  yeah, the us farked up... not only is it NOT the first time, but i could give you 50/50 vegas odds on where the staffers put the blame. until someone comes up with reliable evidence that anyone profited from this, arguing makes you sound like a sock puppet.
 
2013-09-21 11:23:32 PM

Mrtraveler01: Who put the bomp in the bomp bah bomp bah bomp ?


That's the scandal that the Republicans have been trying to tell us all about - those 4 deaths could have been prevented if Obama wasn't doing the bipping and the bopping, and the hipping and the hopping!

i421.photobucket.com
 
2013-09-21 11:24:36 PM

Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: Heck, if I'd voted for a guy who swore he'd hunt down the terrorists who killed 4 Americans and over a year later no progress had been made, I'd be pretty upset.

I see it's a sore spot for you. But, hey, you were warned about voting for BOB.

Did you vote for Bush? I seem to remember some guy that killed a bunch of people and Bush gave up looking for him.


Nope.
 
2013-09-21 11:25:53 PM

Zeppelininthesky: freak7: max_pooper: We're still waiting on that evidence on what Obama did wrong in Bengahzi.

Then you haven't been paying attention to the thread.

All I see in this thread are a few folks spewing contempt for anyone trying to state facts about what happened in Benghazi.


i'd like to hear from anyone who WAS in benghazi.
 
2013-09-21 11:27:13 PM

FuryOfFirestorm: Mrtraveler01: Who put the bomp in the bomp bah bomp bah bomp ?

That's the scandal that the Republicans have been trying to tell us all about - those 4 deaths could have been prevented if Obama wasn't doing the bipping and the bopping, and the hipping and the hopping!

[i421.photobucket.com image 480x304]


Damn those Pudding Pops!
 
2013-09-21 11:28:16 PM

Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

The GOP shows they care by politicizing the dead by trying to make it a scandal, even against overwhelming evidence that it is not.


And BOB Co. lied about the cause of their deaths for political reasons.

Don't kid yourself, man. Politicians on both sides will spin any issue for political gain.

BSAB.

Read a book sometime.
 
2013-09-21 11:28:19 PM

max_pooper: Ishidan: max_pooper:
Again, who is Bob guy you keep talking about.

Guardian 452, currently of the Mainframe system.

Is he the guy that rides a motorcycle inside a computer?


ninety-nine_ninety-nine_ ninety-nine!!
 
2013-09-21 11:30:15 PM

Aristocles: Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

The GOP shows they care by politicizing the dead by trying to make it a scandal, even against overwhelming evidence that it is not.

And BOB Co. lied about the cause of their deaths for political reasons.

Don't kid yourself, man. Politicians on both sides will spin any issue for political gain.

BSAB.

Read a book sometime.


I am pretty sure we know the cause of death. No one lied about that.
 
2013-09-21 11:30:50 PM

cynicalminion: Aristocles: Heck, if I'd voted for a guy who swore he'd hunt down the terrorists who killed 4 Americans and over a year later no progress had been made, I'd be pretty upset.

[citation needed]

let me take a look at where the elections involved anyone hunting down the benghazi terrorists? .

also, i'm pretty sure you DIDN'T vote for him, so go handcuff the people responsible.  i'm sure we'll sleep better at night.

and "no progress has been made?"  are you for serious reals right now? witness the obstructionist shiat going down in congress first...


Please tidy this up and have someone sober proof read it before clicking the "Add Comment" button.
 
2013-09-21 11:32:27 PM
*sigh*
 
2013-09-21 11:32:47 PM

Aristocles: Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

The GOP shows they care by politicizing the dead by trying to make it a scandal, even against overwhelming evidence that it is not.

And BOB Co. lied about the cause of their deaths for political reasons.

Don't kid yourself, man. Politicians on both sides will spin any issue for political gain.

BSAB.

Read a book sometime.


BOB generally means Battery Operated Boyfriend(ie a vibrator). Generally speaking, as an inanimate object, a vibrator is incapable of expressing opinions, and thus incapable of lying.

Why do you continually try to place the blame on inanimate objects?
 
2013-09-21 11:33:44 PM

cynicalminion: i'd like to hear from anyone who WAS in benghazi.


I was in a gay Nazi named Ben. Does that count?
 
2013-09-21 11:33:52 PM
Mrtraveler01:

If Obama and the CIA came out

the rainbow would be sweeter than skittles.
 
2013-09-21 11:36:36 PM

Aristocles: And BOB Co. lied about the cause of their deaths for political reasons.


You do realize on some level that simply repeating that lie over and over again doesn't actually make it become the truth over time?

Of course it does tend to distract somewhat from the fact that the only actual scandal involving Benghazi is the GOP's corpse-raping exercise in futility trying to manufacture one.

So there's that, I guess.
 
2013-09-21 11:38:42 PM

Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

The GOP shows they care by politicizing the dead by trying to make it a scandal, even against overwhelming evidence that it is not.

And BOB Co. lied about the cause of their deaths for political reasons.

Don't kid yourself, man. Politicians on both sides will spin any issue for political gain.

BSAB.

Read a book sometime.

I am pretty sure we know the cause of death. No one lied about that.


Ya caught me, troll dad. I'll rephrase,

BOB Co. lied about the cause of the terror attacks. At best BOB was simply too arrogant to even entertain the possibility that it was terrorism, at worse, BOB knew it was a concerted attack by terrorists and sent his troopers to catapult the youtube vid propaganda.
 
2013-09-21 11:40:03 PM

Satanic_Hamster: Ricardo Klement: That was a farking fantastic game.

One of the top games of all time, or at least of the pre-pentium era.  That and Wing Commander/II.


I remember I was disappointed when the Pentium came out and there wasn't a software clock to make it run at a reasonable speed. Heck, even on the 486 it was all but unplayably fast.

An uncle of a friend was a waist gunner on a B-17. He said that you couldn't slew the gun fast enough to get a shot off at an ME-262, so I sped the game up until I couldn't quite slew the waist gun and tried playing it at that speed.

It's hard to win.
 
2013-09-21 11:40:27 PM

KarmicDisaster: common sense is an oxymoron: I'm BOB

[neveryetmelted.com image 375x200]


but do you prefer clams or oysters?
 
2013-09-21 11:40:53 PM

cynicalminion: Mrtraveler01:

If Obama and the CIA came out

the rainbow would be sweeter than Skittles.


This explains everything! It was Thugvon behind it all! Brave Sir George of Zimmerman slayed the evil mastermind before he could finish the cover-up!
 
2013-09-21 11:40:53 PM

Aristocles: Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

The GOP shows they care by politicizing the dead by trying to make it a scandal, even against overwhelming evidence that it is not.

And BOB Co. lied about the cause of their deaths for political reasons.

Don't kid yourself, man. Politicians on both sides will spin any issue for political gain.

BSAB.

Read a book sometime.

I am pretty sure we know the cause of death. No one lied about that.

Ya caught me, troll dad. I'll rephrase,

BOB Co. lied about the cause of the terror attacks. At best BOB was simply too arrogant to even entertain the possibility that it was terrorism, at worse, BOB knew it was a concerted attack by terrorists and sent his troopers to catapult the youtube vid propaganda.


You need a new act. This one bores me. You're boring.
 
2013-09-21 11:42:40 PM

FuryOfFirestorm: cynicalminion: Notabunny: If this is how Republicans react when we elect an African-American, I can't wait to see what they do when we elect a Vagina-American.

it'll be even better if she's (part-anything) AND we still have a first lady... wanda sykes 4 prez!!

Now I want her to run for President. If you think Obama drives the GOP nuts, I'd imagine an opinionated, foul mouthed black gay woman would make their brains ooze out of their ears.


I call bullshiat. What brains?
 
2013-09-21 11:43:42 PM

Aristocles: Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

The GOP shows they care by politicizing the dead by trying to make it a scandal, even against overwhelming evidence that it is not.

And BOB Co. lied about the cause of their deaths for political reasons.

Don't kid yourself, man. Politicians on both sides will spin any issue for political gain.

BSAB.

Read a book sometime.

I am pretty sure we know the cause of death. No one lied about that.

Ya caught me, troll dad. I'll rephrase,

BOB Co. lied about the cause of the terror attacks. At best BOB was simply too arrogant to even entertain the possibility that it was terrorism, at worse, BOB knew it was a concerted attack by terrorists and sent his troopers to catapult the youtube vid propaganda.


Even though he actually said it was a terror attack a few weeks later? The reason to cover something up is to, well, cover something up. He must really suck at covering up stuff by telling everyone exactly what happened.
 
2013-09-21 11:43:43 PM

FuryOfFirestorm: cynicalminion: i'd like to hear from anyone who WAS in benghazi.

I was in a gay Nazi named Ben. Does that count?


dunno, did you put hitler in the cupboard?
 
2013-09-21 11:44:08 PM
Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?
 
2013-09-21 11:45:22 PM

cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?


It's his  Battery  Operated  Boyfriend. Why he hates his vibrator so much, I don't know.
 
2013-09-21 11:45:25 PM

cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?


Bob is everyone and no one at the same time.
 
2013-09-21 11:47:33 PM

cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?


Difficult to be sure through all the derp-spew but I think it's the troll's vibrator.

He's got some kind of Mr Garrison/Mr Hat relationship going on with that thing or something.
 
2013-09-21 11:48:50 PM

FuryOfFirestorm: cynicalminion: Mrtraveler01:

If Obama and the CIA came out

the rainbow would be sweeter than Skittles.

This explains everything! It was Thugvon behind it all! Brave Sir George of Zimmerman slayed the evil mastermind before he could finish the cover-up!


ew, no.

fartbongo was too busy training his nsa troops to notice that he hadn't written his letter to princess celestia.  therefore, benghazi was banished to the moon, and now the fate of the world rests on tara strongs shoulders, because she's HAAAARRRRDDDCOOOORRRRrrrreeee...
 
2013-09-21 11:49:28 PM

cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?


After much hard-hitting investigative work, Darrell Issa has finally discovered the true architect of the attack on Benghazi:

upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-09-21 11:50:52 PM

cynicalminion: FuryOfFirestorm: cynicalminion: Mrtraveler01:

If Obama and the CIA came out

the rainbow would be sweeter than Skittles.

This explains everything! It was Thugvon behind it all! Brave Sir George of Zimmerman slayed the evil mastermind before he could finish the cover-up!

ew, no.

fartbongo was too busy training his nsa troops to notice that he hadn't written his letter to princess celestia.  therefore, benghazi was banished to the moon, and now the fate of the world rests on tara strongs shoulders, because she's HAAAARRRRDDDCOOOORRRRrrrreeee...



Slab Bulkhead
 
2013-09-21 11:51:12 PM

grumpfuff: cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?

It's his  Battery  Operated  Boyfriend. Why he hates his vibrator so much, I don't know.


dammit, now you got "coin operated boy" stuck in my head

damn earworms.
 
2013-09-21 11:52:48 PM

quatchi: cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?

Difficult to be sure through all the derp-spew but I think it's the troll's vibrator.

He's got some kind of Mr Garrison/Mr Hat relationship going on with that thing or something.


Does that mean the truth behind the scandal is hidden in a redwood forest of penises? Or that Brett Farve wearing nothing but a towel is the real mastermind behind the attack?
 
2013-09-21 11:52:51 PM

Uranus Is Huge!: js34603: notto: freak7: notto: 18.

Prove it.

You first.  Provide a definitive source for your claim that tells us who stayed for the hearings from both sides of the chamber.  Otherwise, my claim is a good as yours and as well supported.

If we are just going to look at pictures, we can start here.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/09/20/these-pictures-prove-fox-is-l y ing-democrats-did/196000

Definitely the attention he wanted. You've cornered him now, he's going to have to provide evidence!

/you spent half the thread responding to trolls and got butthurt when it was pointed out
//tip: don't respond to trolls, start with me, I'm not reading it anyway

I'm here to complain about the guy complaining about the guy responding to Neighborhood Watch's alt.

meta


I'm here to divide by zero.
 
2013-09-21 11:54:39 PM

FuryOfFirestorm: quatchi: cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?

Difficult to be sure through all the derp-spew but I think it's the troll's vibrator.

He's got some kind of Mr Garrison/Mr Hat relationship going on with that thing or something.

Does that mean the truth behind the scandal is hidden in a redwood forest of penises? Or that Brett Farve wearing nothing but a towel is the real mastermind behind the attack?


This..... is why dems shouldn't be investigating the Tragedy At Benghazi.
 
2013-09-21 11:54:50 PM

atomic-age: FuryOfFirestorm: cynicalminion: Notabunny: If this is how Republicans react when we elect an African-American, I can't wait to see what they do when we elect a Vagina-American.

it'll be even better if she's (part-anything) AND we still have a first lady... wanda sykes 4 prez!!

Now I want her to run for President. If you think Obama drives the GOP nuts, I'd imagine an opinionated, foul mouthed black gay woman would make their brains ooze out of their ears.

I call bullshiat. What brains?


ok, lack of brain-oozage...  plenty of head-asplodey though.  :)  "the man had to rescue an entire COUNTRY that was mistreated by its former owner, at least give him a fresh start with his DOG!!"
 
2013-09-21 11:56:21 PM
It's Bob Dobbs, ya idjits.
 
2013-09-21 11:57:04 PM

Zeppelininthesky: cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?

Bob is everyone and no one at the same time.


his name is robert paulson
 
2013-09-21 11:57:20 PM

Kittypie070: It's Bob Dobbs, ya idjits.


Bob Dole?

BOB DOLE!
 
2013-09-21 11:58:41 PM

Kittypie070: It's Bob Dobbs, ya idjits.


nah, idjits is bobby singer's word.  :P
 
2013-09-22 12:03:03 AM

cynicalminion: dammit, now you got "coin operated boy" stuck in my head


upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-09-22 12:03:26 AM

Aristocles: the Tragedy At Benghazi.


Ooh, that capitalization stuff means you are totally gonna be taken seriously now!

All you are doing at this point is repeating the same lies over and over despite the fact that they have been thoroughly debunked for over a year.

But go on and cry your crocodile tears like you care.

There's bound to be someone come along sooner or later who doesn't see immediately how completely out of touch with reality you are.

To paraphrase Jim Carrey here..    ...I'm still saying you got a chance.
 
2013-09-22 12:06:09 AM

quatchi: cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?

Difficult to be sure through all the derp-spew but I think it's the troll's vibrator.

He's got some kind of Mr Garrison/Mr Hat relationship going on with that thing or something.


eweweweweweweweeeewwwwwwwwwww... no.  "who's that trip-trapping over

FuryOfFirestorm: quatchi: cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?

Difficult to be sure through all the derp-spew but I think it's the troll's vibrator.

He's got some kind of Mr Garrison/Mr Hat relationship going on with that thing or something.

Does that mean the truth behind the scandal is hidden in a redwood forest of penises? Or that Brett Farve wearing nothing but a towel is the real mastermind behind the attack?


pfft, wookies don't wear towels....
 
2013-09-22 12:06:20 AM

Dinki: It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.


Right, like being seen with a lying Democrat.  DIAF Dinki.
 
2013-09-22 12:19:27 AM
FuryOfFirestorm:
Now I want her to run for President. If you think Obama drives the GOP nuts, I'd imagine an opinionated, foul mouthed black gay woman would make their brains ooze out of their ears.

I'd like to do one better.  How about a foul-mouthed thrice-divorced black woman who is already known due to her career in ACTING, and whose roles included characters who used firearms for intimidation, faked religious fervor, and got involved in a coup by a scheming African...
images4.wikia.nocookie.net  i.telegraph.co.uk images2.wikia.nocookie.net
She's even twice played God!
Whoopi Goldberg for President!
/she's not gay?  Nobody's perfect...
 
2013-09-22 12:19:49 AM

Aristocles: Zeppelininthesky: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

The GOP shows they care by politicizing the dead by trying to make it a scandal, even against overwhelming evidence that it is not.

And BOB Co. lied about the cause of their deaths for political reasons.

Don't kid yourself, man. Politicians on both sides will spin any issue for political gain.

BSAB.

Read a book sometime.


You're still farkin' that chicken, eh? You are aware, being the Benghazirugladijongate scholar that you are, that the administration changed its assesment to it being a pre-planned terror attack over a month before the election, right? How did admitting error in their initial assesment a month prior to the election help them win?
 
2013-09-22 12:20:02 AM

armoredbulldozer: Dinki: It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.

Right, like being seen with a lying Democrat.  DIAF Dinki.


thou shalt not lie with a democrat as with a REAL man, otherwise, stoning.  leviticracks 4/20
 
2013-09-22 12:21:23 AM

Ishidan: She's even twice played God!
Whoopi Goldberg for President!
/she's not gay? Nobody's perfect...


Also played Death:
1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2013-09-22 12:21:28 AM

Lionel Mandrake: themindiswatching: So Obama "murdered" the ambassador  how again?

Because he failed to authorize the use of warp-speed jets to fly to the area of attack and drop those super-smart bombs that only kill bad guys.  Study it out.


I swear to god. The,"study it out" bit just kills me every time.
 
2013-09-22 12:23:10 AM

Satanic_Hamster: Ishidan: She's even twice played God!
Whoopi Goldberg for President!
/she's not gay? Nobody's perfect...

Also played Death:
[1.bp.blogspot.com image 320x170]


I think I'm the only person who liked that movie.
 
2013-09-22 12:24:18 AM

Ishidan: FuryOfFirestorm:
Now I want her to run for President. If you think Obama drives the GOP nuts, I'd imagine an opinionated, foul mouthed black gay woman would make their brains ooze out of their ears.

I'd like to do one better.  How about a foul-mouthed thrice-divorced black woman who is already known due to her career in ACTING, and whose roles included characters who used firearms for intimidation, faked religious fervor, and got involved in a coup by a scheming African...
[images4.wikia.nocookie.net image 246x246]  [i.telegraph.co.uk image 390x246] [images2.wikia.nocookie.net image 385x242]
She's even twice played God!
Whoopi Goldberg for President!
/she's not gay?  Nobody's perfect...


okay, you started it...

the reverend mother is professor mcgonagall AND granny wendy.  want to start talking perfect?
 
2013-09-22 12:31:56 AM

Fart_Machine: I think I'm the only person who liked that movie.


25.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-09-22 12:33:57 AM

Aristocles: notto: Aristocles:

They knew from the beginning that this was an organized attack, not a protest that got out of hand. They spent a week or so blaming a youtube video instead of telling the public that it was planned in advance.

Prove it.

U.S. agencies came to the view that the Benghazi attack had begun spontaneously after protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo against a short film made in California lampooning the Prophet Mohammad. Turner said that as U.S. intelligence subsequently learned more about the attack, "we revised our initial assessment to reflect new information indicating that it was a deliberate and organized terrorist attack carried out by extremists."

How does that support your "they knew from the beginning".  You are moving the goal posts.  In fact, your source directly conflicts with your claim.    Way to go genius.

Know how I know you didn't read the link?

Within hours of the attacks ending, some government sources in Washington were already acknowledging they might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of two militant factions, Ansar al Shariah and al Qaeda's North Africa-based affiliate, known as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.


so, within hours of the attacks ending (please tell me how long these attacks dragged out) they "might well have been planned and organized in advance, and that members of a couple a-Q factions may have been involved"
 
2013-09-22 12:34:04 AM

cynicalminion: grumpfuff: cameroncrazy1984: Did we figure out who Bob is, yet?

It's his  Battery  Operated  Boyfriend. Why he hates his vibrator so much, I don't know.

dammit, now you got "coin operated boy" stuck in my head

damn earworms.


www.projekt.com
 
2013-09-22 12:35:44 AM
Issa gives partisan hacks a bad name.
 
2013-09-22 12:36:37 AM
cynicalminion:
the reverend mother is professor mcgonagall AND granny wendy.  want to start talking perfect?

Not black, though, and also British.  Whoopi was born in New Yawk, although of course she wasn't called that at the time.
Which is, of course, perfect birfer bait as well:  go looking for a birth certificate with "Whoopi Goldberg" on it, good luck...
 
2013-09-22 12:39:34 AM

Satanic_Hamster: Ishidan: She's even twice played God!
Whoopi Goldberg for President!
/she's not gay? Nobody's perfect...

Also played Death:
[1.bp.blogspot.com image 320x170]


I think I've just invoked Nothing Is Obscure On Fark.  Good work, Farkers!
 
2013-09-22 12:42:15 AM

Ishidan: cynicalminion:
the reverend mother is professor mcgonagall AND granny wendy.  want to start talking perfect?

Not black, though, and also British.  Whoopi was born in New Yawk, although of course she wasn't called that at the time.
Which is, of course, perfect birfer bait as well:  go looking for a birth certificate with "Whoopi Goldberg" on it, good luck...


split the difference, laugh at bette midler, kathy najimy on a vacuum, SJP going amokamokamok, and then do the holy farking hell triple-take realizing that binks is mcgee in ncis.
 
2013-09-22 12:43:27 AM

Ishidan: She's even twice played God!
Whoopi Goldberg for President!
/she's not gay?  Nobody's perfect...


IIRC, she admitted that she's bi and had at least one relationship with a woman.
 
2013-09-22 12:45:32 AM

netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.


You auditioning for a gig on Fox?
 
2013-09-22 12:48:30 AM

Satanic_Hamster: Fart_Machine: I think I'm the only person who liked that movie.

[25.media.tumblr.com image 500x334]


Rose McGowan as Miss Kitty FTW.

Also Bob Odenkirk's turn as an organ transplant Doctor was delightful.

After watching Whoop as Death I'm not quite sure if America is ready for a President who's head explodes when angry.

If they wanted that they could just vote Republican, couldn't they?
 
2013-09-22 12:54:27 AM

Ishidan: cynicalminion:
the reverend mother is professor mcgonagall AND granny wendy.  want to start talking perfect?

Not black, though, and also British.  Whoopi was born in New Yawk, although of course she wasn't called that at the time.
Which is, of course, perfect birfer bait as well:  go looking for a birth certificate with "Whoopi Goldberg" on it, good luck...


okay, so let me throw out this one for ya: ruby dee... maybe i'm just suffering from fanboy squee, but the idea of Reverend Mother Abigail McGonagall defending Hogwarts from R(alph)andall F(iennes)lagg sounds way too sweet to stay in my head...
 
2013-09-22 12:58:42 AM
I guess we were all guilty, in a way. We all shot him, we all skinned him, and we all got a complimentary bumper sticker that said, 'I helped skin Bob.' - Jack Handey
 
2013-09-22 01:08:06 AM
After watching Whoop as Death I'm not quite sure if America is ready for a President who's head explodes when angry.
*snerk*  angry at us or at "them"?

24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-09-22 01:12:45 AM

cynicalminion: After watching Whoop as Death I'm not quite sure if America is ready for a President who's head explodes when angry.
*snerk*  angry at us or at "them"?

[24.media.tumblr.com image 700x985]


I don't know who "us" or "them" is...but I'm on her side.
 
2013-09-22 01:13:24 AM

armoredbulldozer: Dinki: It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.

Right, like being seen with a lying Democrat.  DIAF Dinki.


Three trolls vanish, another one appears.

How strange...
 
2013-09-22 01:15:47 AM

cynicalminion: After watching Whoop as Death I'm not quite sure if America is ready for a President who's head explodes when angry.
*snerk*  angry at us or at "them"?

[24.media.tumblr.com image 700x985]


Um, yum, just yum.

I've completely forgotten wotever witty wisecrack I was gonna make here.

Pretend I said sommat funneh here, I'mma go back and look at that pic again.
 
2013-09-22 01:22:26 AM
Look at all the difference of opinion and totally not trolling in this thread.
 
2013-09-22 01:36:16 AM

log_jammin: Look at all the difference of opinion and totally not trolling in this thread.


Good thing I'm not a mod, is all I'm saying...
 
2013-09-22 01:42:18 AM

cynicalminion: armoredbulldozer: Dinki: It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.

Right, like being seen with a lying Democrat.  DIAF Dinki.

thou shalt not lie with a democrat as with a REAL man, otherwise, stoning.  leviticracks 4/20


I think they are not the *only* ones that are stoned. I can smell you from here.
 
2013-09-22 01:53:31 AM

Zeppelininthesky: cynicalminion: armoredbulldozer: Dinki: It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.

Right, like being seen with a lying Democrat.  DIAF Dinki.

thou shalt not lie with a democrat as with a REAL man, otherwise, stoning.  leviticracks 4/20

I think they are not the *only* ones that are stoned. I can smell you from here.


nah, that's my neighbors. not that i haven't tried it, but last time i smoked was '09.

always willing to provide schizophrenic-somewhere-outta-left-field commentary though.  :D
 
2013-09-22 02:22:38 AM
For those of you who might be unfamiliar with this site:

Welcome to the Fark Politics tab.

We like to point out how wrong Republicans are about the things they say, and there are sources to prove their hypocrisy.

In the middle of all this, there are trolls who post biased, opinion-based links in an attempt to see if you are actually awake.

If you feel the need to respond to them, out of boredom, curiosity or anything else, these are the only acceptable responses:

To Aristocles: "Who is Bob?" (Hint: he'll never answer, and he'll ramble on about talking points you really don't care about.)

To freak7: "Prove it." (He can't, and sometimes will back himself into a corner and prove himself more wrong.)

Watch out for subject switches and Townhall links. Stay safe out there, citizen. (And by citizen, we mean you're likely more eligible to live here than Rafael Cruz.)
 
2013-09-22 02:31:15 AM
img547.imageshack.us
 
2013-09-22 02:51:51 AM

bigsteve3OOO: whidbey: Remind me why Darrell Issa keeps getting re-elected?

Oh right, I forgot it's because you decided to vote for him because Obama isn't doing enough/too much/muh freedoms. Silly me.

Obama is doing quite a bit to my freedoms.  Continuing the work Bush did to limit them.


LOL I TROL U HERPA DERPA DU
 
2013-09-22 02:58:05 AM

freak7: notto: Why are you changing the subject from your claims that the administration didn't admit they made mistakes when they did admit that?

They admitted to a couple of minor mistakes, only after it blew up in the media and they could no longer deny them without looking like idiots. Since we know they were so willing to lie about something as minor as the reason for the attack, why are you so sure they're telling the truth about everything else?


No one who posts something like this should be considered worthy of discussion.
 
2013-09-22 02:59:47 AM

DeArmondVI: You're still farkin' that chicken, eh? You are aware, being the Benghazirugladijongate scholar that you are, that the administration changed its assesment to it being a pre-planned terror attack over a month before the election, right? How did admitting error in their initial assesment a month prior to the election help them win?


You obviously don't understand how Obama's time machine works, do you?
 
2013-09-22 03:36:18 AM

Heliovdrake: Heliovdrake: 3 THINGS.1. What possible information could he possibly be getting over a YEAR after the event, that he couldn't get over the phone or via written reports / pictures.2. How much will he be given PER DAY as part of his food budget.3. How much is his trip + Security going to cost the US taxpayer?

Oh ipad formating, how you troll me.

3 THINGS.

1. What possible information could he possibly be getting over a YEAR after the event, that he couldn't get over the phone or via written reports / pictures.

2. How much will he be given PER DAY as part of his food budget.

3. How much is his trip + Security going to cost the US taxpayer?


I'm sorry, but those questions are only to be asked of Democrats, because they're the only ones mooching off the taxpayer.
 
2013-09-22 03:55:44 AM

LouDobbsAwaaaay: Did the GOP vote to slash embassy security funding prior to this attack?
Yes.


But Obama made them do it!
 
2013-09-22 04:49:02 AM

Ricardo Klement: Satanic_Hamster: Ricardo Klement: That was a farking fantastic game.

One of the top games of all time, or at least of the pre-pentium era.  That and Wing Commander/II.

I remember I was disappointed when the Pentium came out and there wasn't a software clock to make it run at a reasonable speed. Heck, even on the 486 it was all but unplayably fast.

An uncle of a friend was a waist gunner on a B-17. He said that you couldn't slew the gun fast enough to get a shot off at an ME-262, so I sped the game up until I couldn't quite slew the waist gun and tried playing it at that speed.

It's hard to win.


LucasArts made some sweet games back then, but I didn't get around to trying that one.  Well, my DOS machine was a 286, and I went Mac after that.
 
2013-09-22 06:22:05 AM
Umm... as shiatty as this may be, "partisan delegations can be allowed 'in rare circumstances and at the sole discretion of the Chairman,'" and Darrell Issa is the chairman of the committee. There's nothing against the rules going on here, despite the tone of the article.

The bigger scandal to me is that the douche for some reason has to stop in Italy and Egypt before going to Libya, and isn't going to Benghazi. I have to wonder what he could possibly learn from this trip to contribute to any investigation, bogus or not, of the Benghazi consulate attack. It sounds like he's getting a free vacation with a layover in Tripoli on the way home.
 
2013-09-22 06:47:39 AM
Issa Benghazi scandal yet?
i18.photobucket.com
 
2013-09-22 07:16:50 AM
Just ignore Aristocles. Based on his profile, and what he said in this thread, he's quite young and angry.

1) His comments are unwaveringly loyal to the GOP, but he says he didn't vote for Bush.
Possibly he was not yet 18, or he was in college and hadn't registered.

2) His profile posts lyrics from KMFDM's album WWIII, which came out in 2003, and Laibach's Das Spiel ist Aus album, which came out in 2007. Like most college-age boys, he thinks he's cool by posting angsty political lyrics by obscure (AKA non-radio) bands, but what he doesn't realize is that they've had a huge following since the late 80s.

3) These two bands are German. Once again, he thinks he's cool by posting German lyrics (Laibach), but it really just says that he remembers just enough German from his language classes in high school, and it was probably through the high school German club where he was introduced to such music. He's trying to assert superiority through his German knowledge.

4) Also, what he doesn't realize is that the lyrics are about dubya.

Aristocles is likely between 18-25, and probably believes a lot of what he is saying. It's just that his worldview his heavily skewed and quite narrow right now. He may turnaround, but it'll likely take a meltdown, and we won't see him again to confirm.
 
2013-09-22 08:52:50 AM
Wake Up Sheeple:

Aristocles is likely between 18-25, and probably believes a lot of what he is saying. It's just that his worldview his heavily skewed and quite narrow right now. He may turnaround, but it'll likely take a meltdown, and we won't see him again to confirm.

He's an admitted troll alt account, such analysis is unnecessary.
 
2013-09-22 09:00:49 AM

max_pooper: Aristocles: LeoffDaGrate: Aristocles: I know this is hard for Farklibs to understand, but please try to follow....

The GOP actually cares about the Americans brutally murdered in Benghazi because of Hildawg and BOB's blunders. This isn't political, it's about finding answers for the families of the slain.

Are you still really trying to invent new nicknames and memes?  How's that goin' for ya?  Doesn't seem to be sticking.

But then again, you're probably just coming up with this stuff to increase the reply count so then you can complain about it, right?

Hil-dawg is from South Park
BOB is from Brick House
"Read a book sometime" is from another Farker

My only original contribution of late, that I know of, is "Jesus H.W. Christ," and I've been saying that for years.

Folks who are still harping on "potatoe" don't really have a lot of room to talk.

So who is Bob?


The Brits will tell you. Bob's your uncle.
 
2013-09-22 09:06:19 AM
 
2013-09-22 09:12:48 AM

amiable: Wake Up Sheeple:

Aristocles is likely between 18-25, and probably believes a lot of what he is saying. It's just that his worldview his heavily skewed and quite narrow right now. He may turnaround, but it'll likely take a meltdown, and we won't see him again to confirm.

He's an admitted troll alt account, such analysis is unnecessary.


I picture him sitting at his computer on Fark and each time someone replies to a comment of his, or brings him up, he gets all giddy like a little girl and goes to some tally sheet:

Replies that mention me: // // // // // ///
Replies that take my reply seriously: ///
Replies that mention my use of BOB: // // /
Replies that mention me as a troll or alt: // // ///
Replies that get me on another's ignore list: // /
Replies that agree with what I say: 0
 
2013-09-22 10:15:06 AM

aug3: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/world/africa/libyan-militia-leader- c harged-in-2012-benghazi-attack.html?_r=0

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/10/world/africa/libya-thwarts-arrests -i n-benghazi-attack.html

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/09/us-law-enforcement-not- al lowed-into-benghazi-for-arrests/


That's great and all, but facts aren't generally something the folks "outraged" over this incident are concerned about.
 
2013-09-22 11:17:54 AM

indylaw: The Benghazi truth movement is at least as retarded as the 9/11 truth movement.

Discuss.


Well, there are no  memos saying the Democrats need a "Pearl Harbor event" to put their plans in motion, so I'd say it's even more retarded.
 
2013-09-22 11:47:24 AM

Dinki: It would be a shame if some tragedy should befall Issa while he is there.


Yes, it would. If think a tragedy at home, something involving his pool-boy and a pool vacuum, would be less destructive in the long run.
 
2013-09-22 12:21:20 PM

LeoffDaGrate: amiable: Wake Up Sheeple:

Aristocles is likely between 18-25, and probably believes a lot of what he is saying. It's just that his worldview his heavily skewed and quite narrow right now. He may turnaround, but it'll likely take a meltdown, and we won't see him again to confirm.

He's an admitted troll alt account, such analysis is unnecessary.

I picture him sitting at his computer on Fark and each time someone replies to a comment of his, or brings him up, he gets all giddy like a little girl and goes to some tally sheet:

Replies that mention me: // // // // // ///
Replies that take my reply seriously: ///
Replies that mention my use of BOB: // // /
Replies that mention me as a troll or alt: // // ///
Replies that get me on another's ignore list: // /
Replies that agree with what I say: 0


What are you talking about? All his alts agree with him in every thread.
 
2013-09-22 01:19:51 PM

netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.


To the old white scared stupid male chickenhawk failures and racists that make up the GOP, I'm sure they do
 
2013-09-22 01:25:31 PM
Who's this BOB dude?
 
2013-09-22 02:24:48 PM

Kittypie070: Who's this BOB dude?


i293.photobucket.com

Did that catchy Price Tag tune w/ Jesse J. Good stuff, really. Not particularly germane to the Pol Tab but wotevs.
 
2013-09-22 03:00:00 PM

quatchi: Kittypie070: Who's this BOB dude?

[i293.photobucket.com image 640x360]

Did that catchy Price Tag tune w/ Jesse J. Good stuff, really. Not particularly germane to the Pol Tab but wotevs.


Can we pretend that airplanes, in the night sky, are like shooting stars? I could really use a wish right now.
 
2013-09-22 03:00:19 PM
Why invite them? If they're going to be monumental cowards and walk out of the room rather than face the parents of the victims then I wouldn't invite them either.
 
2013-09-22 03:04:25 PM

randomjsa: Why invite them? If they're going to be monumental cowards and walk out of the room rather than face the parents of the victims then I wouldn't invite them either.


We've already covered that.  More Republicans than Democrats walked out of the hearing room.  Are you saying that those Republicans that did not stay should not be invited on this trip as well?  Should the Democrats that did stay be invited on the trip?  After all, by your standard, they are not the monumental cowards that the Republicans who left are.  Seems if you want this to be a coward free trip, party lines might not be the way to go.
 
2013-09-22 03:04:54 PM

randomjsa: Why invite them? If they're going to be monumental cowards and walk out of the room rather than face the parents of the victims then I wouldn't invite them either.


You're late to the thread, buddy. That and using an already de-bunked talking point? Tsk tsk. You get nothing sir. Good day.
 
2013-09-22 03:10:58 PM

Triple Oak: quatchi: Kittypie070: Who's this BOB dude?

[i293.photobucket.com image 640x360]

Did that catchy Price Tag tune w/ Jesse J. Good stuff, really. Not particularly germane to the Pol Tab but wotevs.

Can we pretend that airplanes, in the night sky, are like shooting stars? I could really use a wish right now.


*summons the Leonids, or whichever*
 
2013-09-22 04:22:37 PM

jso2897: Issa Benghazi scandal yet?
[i18.photobucket.com image 400x382]


thanks, now i'm picturing the next elections being settled via pod-races.
 
2013-09-22 05:13:42 PM

Joesama: YoungLochinvar: netcentric: The Democrats wouldn't even stay in the hearings to listen to the families of those who died.    You really think they would go along on a trip to Libya...

They had a year to go if they chose.

Democrats are looking pretty bad these days.

You mean the part of the testimony where 15 of 17 Democrats bailed? That part?

This part?

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/09/20/these-pictures-prove-fox-is-l y ing-democrats-did/196000


Aww I was hoping netcentric would bite like the moron he is. Admittedly I forgot completely about this thread, though...
 
2013-09-22 07:19:27 PM
Is a "fact" another one of those crazy Italian words for "prostitute"?

// bunga-bunga!
 
2013-09-22 09:06:35 PM

max_pooper: Who is Bob?


Bob's yer uncle.
 
2013-09-22 09:20:04 PM

lilbjorn: max_pooper: Who is Bob?

Bob's yer uncle.


I still don't get it.
 
2013-09-23 01:51:35 AM

xanadian: The Briny Derp: Christ, what an asshole.

No, Rep. Issa just wants to make sure the Democrats stay safe back in DC.  It's actually very thoughtful of him.

...

I typed all that with a straight face.


You must be paralyzed.  Democrats invited? Right.  Like asking alcoholics to take inventory at your liquor store......
 
2013-09-23 02:02:29 AM

armoredbulldozer: xanadian: The Briny Derp: Christ, what an asshole.

No, Rep. Issa just wants to make sure the Democrats stay safe back in DC.  It's actually very thoughtful of him.

...

I typed all that with a straight face.

You must be paralyzed.  Democrats invited? Right.  Like asking alcoholics to take inventory at your liquor store......


Aren't you just adorable. Wait, no. Not adorable. Retarded. That's the word.
 
Displayed 499 of 499 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report