I_C_Weener: The statue of David is harmful. Its intimidating that there are men out there packing that large of equipment!
BizarreMan: Picture of the offending statue. As it contains unblurred perky nipples it may be considered NSFW.I wouldn't consider it offensive, but I don't really like it as a piece of art
BizarreMan: As it contains unblurred perky nipples it may be considered NSFW.
Mugato: [saralinwilde.files.wordpress.com image 580x480]
SpdrJay: I saw a statue like that when I was 10.Three days later I was sucking dick for coke and knocking over liquor stores for cigarettes.
simplicimus: I_C_Weener: The statue of David is harmful. Its intimidating that there are men out there packing that large of equipment!Meh. I think it was cold when the model posed.
optikeye: That's nothing in my city we have a huge cast iron stature on a 100 foot towel looking over the city.Vulcan the God of the Forge: In full leather wear with harness and assless chaps.
AverageAmericanGuy: Community mores determine which bills get passed. If you want more bare breasted statues in your city, get more bare breasted statue lovers to move there. They won't, of course, because they prefer to isolate themselves from people with fundamentally different viewpoints
FF Mac: Aren't all chaps by design assless? I mean, assed chaps might also be called "pants."
Thingster: *sigh*, chaps are, by definition, ass less.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jul 27 2017 23:19:44
Runtime: 0.315 sec (315 ms)