Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   Sodomy, condoms and porn - oh, my   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 201
    More: Dumbass, Satans, Minnesota, United Church of Christ, objective truth, Islamic studies, moral absolutism, United Methodist Church, City Pages  
•       •       •

20564 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Sep 2013 at 5:26 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



201 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-09-15 08:07:21 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: If he was the example of perfect morality, then why didn't he condemn those two "immoral" things?

One interpretation of 'disciple' is 'slave'. There are many examples in history of people calling themselves 'slaves of Christ'.

As for slavery, we are all slaves. We just think we are free.

Oh I'm well aware of the biblical interpretations of "servant" as it could be read as slave.

Problem is any interpretation that favors servant marginalizes slavery (especially with respect to obvious references to it in the bible), and any interpretation that favors slave demonstrates a god that is pro-slavery. A sticky position for christians.

Again, you are a slave in many ways even though you think you are free. Are living the life you would choose? If the barriers erected to prevent you from rising from your station were removed would you continue to live as you do now?


You'll have to be more specific than that. To which forms of prospective slavery do you refer?

/as an aside, the slavery I was speaking of was the owning, as property and labor, of one human being by another
 
2013-09-15 08:08:10 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Condoms prevent abortions so:

Does this mean abortions are what God wants, so Satan invented condoms to piss off God?

Well, maybe, he does seem to favor killing children.

If the result of "killing" is paradise for the kids who get off this miserable rock a little early, the killing of children is only immoral from our selfish perspective.

A chilling concept that, sadly, some people have actually acted upon. Doubly so in light of the inability to empirically demonstrate that there is any better destination for the lives of those children.


It depends of your perspective. If there is a God then their quick execution may have prevented a long slow starvation or abuse. If there's not, killing them probably prevented a long slow starvation or abuse.

Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.
 
2013-09-15 08:18:03 PM  
Some people ask me what problem do I have with organized religion. THIS.
 
2013-09-15 08:26:51 PM  

clowncar on fire: clowncar on fire: fusillade762: eyeq360: Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...

And Dungeons and Dragons.  That's another one.

And the old Procter & Gamble symbol.

[static5.businessinsider.com image 263x317]

You missed the 13 stars

[mrnussbaum.com image 320x220]

As Americans, we were destined for ruination anyhow.


Yikes, that map gave me a headache...it shows 14 colonies.  Maine wasn't one of the original 13...it was part of Massachusetts until 1820
 
2013-09-15 08:30:55 PM  

fusillade762: And Madonna's Superbowl half-time show:

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 640x449]

Satanic Ritual Performed at The NFL Half Time Show

Be sure to put your crazy pants on before clicking that link.


You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.
 
2013-09-15 08:31:00 PM  
I'm okay with this.
 
2013-09-15 08:43:52 PM  

Mambo Bananapatch: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

Use of this phrase is a demonstration that one's cerebral cortex has calcified; that one is no longer able to consider any other point of view, and, upon encountering one, has no intellectual alternative but to dismiss it as evil.


For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."

I might go further and suggest it's a tactic of desperation when you KNOW that there are people who don't agree with you and you also know that you don't really have a convincing argument for why they should accept your position.
 
2013-09-15 08:45:44 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.


Well, that's okay then. Carry on.
 
2013-09-15 08:47:08 PM  
Well, bless your heart, you try so  very hard.
 
2013-09-15 08:54:00 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.


No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.
 
2013-09-15 08:57:56 PM  
"Raping little kids still OK, though"

No, Misanthrope. Homosexual pedophiles are not ok, whether they wear a coach's uniform or any other.
 
2013-09-15 08:59:56 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.


Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.
 
2013-09-15 09:01:07 PM  

ciberido: You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.


Go on...

ciberido: For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."


The Tao that can be spoken is not the holy Tao.
 
2013-09-15 09:06:45 PM  

Kurmudgeon: "Raping little kids still OK, though"

No, Misanthrope. Homosexual pedophiles are not ok, whether they wear a coach's uniform or any other.


So why does the Catholic Church shuffle priests who rape kids around, instead of prosecuting them under the law?
 
2013-09-15 09:08:51 PM  

Kurmudgeon: "Raping little kids still OK, though"

No, Misanthrope. Homosexual pedophiles are not ok, whether they wear a coach's uniform or any other.


Um.


So you do know that adults that do sexual things to children...even when the adult and child are the same gender... are pedophiles, right? Not homosexual.

Just making sure you're not having a stroke.
 
2013-09-15 09:10:44 PM  

tinfoil-hat maggie: ciberido: You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.

Go on...

ciberido: For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."

The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.


FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.
 
2013-09-15 09:12:46 PM  
Also, I heard there would be tacos.
 
2013-09-15 09:13:14 PM  
Sodomy, condoms and porn - oh, my

What is "The 2016 Presidential elections"

I'll take "things requiring citizens to bend over" for 800, Alex.
 
2013-09-15 09:16:09 PM  

megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.


You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards
 
2013-09-15 09:18:10 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards


Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!
 
2013-09-15 09:19:23 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: tinfoil-hat maggie: ciberido: You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.

Go on...

ciberido: For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."

The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.

FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.


Don't tell anyone about my love of eating unholy tacos.
 
2013-09-15 09:19:26 PM  

megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!


Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.
 
2013-09-15 09:19:36 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.

FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.


Lulz, with the amount of hero and derp in this thread, tacos most appropriate : )
 
2013-09-15 09:21:33 PM  

tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.

FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.

Lulz, with the amount of herop and derp in this thread, tacos are most appropriate : )


/FTFM
 
2013-09-15 09:21:33 PM  

the_chief: You can take your sodomy and shove it up your ass!


From Merriam-Webster:

Sodomy: anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex; also :  copulation with an animal.

Just in case you didn't know it means more than butt-sex.

/though an amusing turn of phrase you had, I'll give you that
 
2013-09-15 09:22:54 PM  
Denial of objective truth?

Seriously?

What colour is the sky in his world?
 
2013-09-15 09:23:12 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.


Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.
 
2013-09-15 09:23:23 PM  
Threadjack by tacos. I like it.
 
2013-09-15 09:24:52 PM  

Mrtraveler01: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.


I like giving Megarian ammo to work with. She's fun.

/certainly a better sport than some
//I know she's not going to sleep with me, shut up
 
2013-09-15 09:26:21 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.


It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
t.qkme.me
 
2013-09-15 09:29:22 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Mrtraveler01: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.

I like giving Megarian ammo to work with. She's fun.

/certainly a better sport than some
//I know she's not going to sleep with me, shut up


Yeah, I like someone with a sense of humor too.
 
2013-09-15 09:30:18 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.


Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?
 
2013-09-15 09:30:57 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: sweet-daddy-2: From the Catechism:

2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex

" exclusive or predominant "
So does this mean every now and again is ok? Or am I reading it wrong?

It means even if you're bi, you're gay.  Even if you think about it, you're gay.


Well. There goes Thursday nights at the Elks.
 
2013-09-15 09:31:50 PM  
There reaches a point where there's no sense trying to reason with these people anymore and you just have to say...

i.qkme.me
 
2013-09-15 09:33:59 PM  

tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]


Well hell, it's on now!

img.fark.net

/clicky for tacos
 
2013-09-15 09:36:07 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]

Well hell, it's on now!



/clicky for tacos


HOTSAUCE AND SODOMY ON ALL THE THINGS!
 
2013-09-15 09:37:15 PM  

megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!


That would be more like fish tacos. You can make 'em up lickety-split.
 
2013-09-15 09:38:04 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Mrtraveler01: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.

I like giving Megarian ammo to work with. She's fun.

/certainly a better sport than some
//I know she's not going to sleep with me, shut up


I hope you like Cake and Sodomy.

/*shrug* I don't get to use Marilyn Manson quotes very often
//any port in the storm
 
2013-09-15 09:38:31 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?


Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.
 
2013-09-15 09:39:43 PM  

megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]

Well hell, it's on now!

/clicky for tacos

HOTSAUCE AND SODOMY ON ALL THE THINGS!



i7.photobucket.com
 
2013-09-15 09:40:18 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

That would be more like fish tacos. You can make 'em up lickety-split.


omg omg omg fish tacos with shredded cabbage omg omg omg

I would eat those tacos so hard.

Wait...
 
2013-09-15 09:40:55 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?


Also, I know you don't like religious people, but who is the one pointing fingers and calling names? If you going says your champion rationality, you can at least provide a rational argument without the sophomoric barbs.
 
2013-09-15 09:41:58 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.


You misspelled it, besides, what exercise? Whether not a positive argument can be made for child slaying, biblical or otherwise?

A very peculiar tangent to take.
 
2013-09-15 09:43:06 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.


Would you guys quit trying to go back to the topic. Some of us are trying to have a serious discussion about tinfoil-hat maggie's tacos.

And megarian brought cake. And sodomy.
 
2013-09-15 09:44:02 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.

You misspelled it, besides, what exercise? Whether not a positive argument can be made for child slaying, biblical or otherwise?

A very peculiar tangent to take.


Whatever man. Shouldn't you be over at 4chan?

This thread is about tacos.
 
2013-09-15 09:44:30 PM  

megarian: Danger Avoid Death: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

That would be more like fish tacos. You can make 'em up lickety-split.

omg omg omg fish tacos with shredded cabbage omg omg omg

I would eat those tacos so hard.

Wait...


No. Go on. Please.
 
2013-09-15 09:46:45 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: megarian: Danger Avoid Death: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

That would be more like fish tacos. You can make 'em up lickety-split.

omg omg omg fish tacos with shredded cabbage omg omg omg

I would eat those tacos so hard.

Wait...

No. Go on. Please.


Someone brought taco cake or something.

I forgot the topic.
 
2013-09-15 09:47:14 PM  

megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]

Well hell, it's on now!

/clicky for tacos

HOTSAUCE AND SODOMY ON ALL THE THINGS!


Thomas Dolby - Hot Sauce

/smother me in your hot sauce, woman till smoke come from your thighs.
 
2013-09-15 09:48:13 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Also, I know you don't like religious people, but who is the one pointing fingers and calling names? If you going says your champion rationality, you can at least provide a rational argument without the sophomoric barbs.


I used to be one of them, so I understand their point of view better than you might suspect.

/and the Krueger comment was intended as humor
//I'm fully aware one doesn't use insults to make logical points, they are emotive, not rational
 
2013-09-15 09:52:04 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Would you guys quit trying to go back to the topic. Some of us are trying to have a serious discussion about tinfoil-hat maggie's tacos.

And megarian brought cake. And sodomy.


It's true but I'm pretty sure the cake is a lie. It could be possible their out of cake. Any way. I like sodomy and tacos ; )
memegenerador.com
 
Displayed 50 of 201 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report