If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   Sodomy, condoms and porn - oh, my   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 201
    More: Dumbass, Satans, Minnesota, United Church of Christ, objective truth, Islamic studies, moral absolutism, United Methodist Church, City Pages  
•       •       •

20561 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Sep 2013 at 5:26 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



201 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-09-15 02:50:17 PM  
"Relinquish all free will to me!"
higheredanxiety.files.wordpress.com
 
2013-09-15 03:00:55 PM  
Sodomy, abortion, contraception, pornography, the redefinition of marriage, and the denial of objective truth are just some of the forces threatening the stability of our civilization. The source of these machinations is none other than the Father of Lies.
 

Raping little kids still OK, though.
 
2013-09-15 03:09:09 PM  
Reading further...

In October of 2012, Niendstedt found himself at the center of a similar controversy when a letter he wrote surfaced in which he tells the mother a young gay man that she must reject her son or go to hell herself.
"I write to inform you that the teaching of the Catholic Church on homosexuality, as described in paragraphs 2357 and 2358 and 2359 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church is rooted in Scripture and based on the Natural Moral Law.  Catholics are bound in conscience to believe this teaching. Those who do not cannot consider themselves to be Catholic and ought not to participate in the sacramental life of the Church... Your eternal salvation may well depend upon a conversation of heart on this topic."


From the Catechism:

2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,141 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.


Nothing like Christian love, is there.  These people are sick.  Sick, sick, SICK!  But we don't discriminate against them!  At least, not unjustly.  We just tell them they can never enjoy loving relationships and have to settle for "disinterested friendship".

Fark you, assholes.  All of you.  Anyone who defends the Church or claims to be a Catholic.  This is what you support.
 
2013-09-15 03:24:17 PM  
This queen isn't very original, is he? Sodomy, abortion, destruction of family values, blah blah blah...

Busted with a hustler and an 8-ball of coke in 5...4...3...
 
2013-09-15 03:31:27 PM  

ecmoRandomNumbers: This queen isn't very original, is he? Sodomy, abortion, destruction of family values, blah blah blah...

Busted with a hustler and an 8-ball of coke Moved to another parish to cover up raping little boys in 5...4...3...


FTFY
 
2013-09-15 03:43:44 PM  
These are a few of my favorite things!~~~
 
2013-09-15 03:55:42 PM  
www.nashvillescene.com
 
2013-09-15 04:08:58 PM  
Sodomy, Condoms and Porn...sounds like a fun night...or a great name for a band.
 
2013-09-15 04:13:45 PM  
Thanks, Satan.
 
2013-09-15 04:56:19 PM  
What the hell is "objective truth"?
 
2013-09-15 05:21:04 PM  
And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...
 
2013-09-15 05:28:06 PM  
Otherwise known as Friday night on Fark.
 
2013-09-15 05:28:40 PM  
Foozball is the devil
 
2013-09-15 05:29:34 PM  
Well to be fair condoms are the work of the devil.
 
2013-09-15 05:31:39 PM  
While the Catholics suck the young boy's penis............ Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
 
2013-09-15 05:32:46 PM  
The only way to win is to not play their game. "Not it!"

Aside from that, Catholicism really is my favorite cult. They have such pretty buildings.
 
2013-09-15 05:33:10 PM  
So how many porn condoms for sodomy can I sign you up for?
 
2013-09-15 05:34:58 PM  
FTA: Fornicators beware: sodomy, condoms and pornography are the work of the devil.
That's the message of a speech posted online last week by the Catholic Archbishop of St. Paul and Minnesota, John C. Niendstedt.


Next:  the Archbishop will add rum and the lash to the list.
 
2013-09-15 05:35:00 PM  

baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?


Like the cake, it's a lie.
 
2013-09-15 05:36:00 PM  
www.thegloss.com

/my my my... looks like someone repressed just a weeeee too much
 
2013-09-15 05:37:53 PM  
and i'm wondering (aren't you?) just how wide their "stridently anti-gay stance" is...  wide enough, say, for a camel to pass through?

/OH MY!
 
2013-09-15 05:38:01 PM  
why does anyone care what this pendejo thinks about anything?
 
2013-09-15 05:41:41 PM  
the devil gave humans critical thinking, which god didn't want. God  wanted us to not eat from the tree of knowledge so we could basically be thoughtless slaves for eternity, the the devil did us a favor and turned the tables with a single conversation.

also the devil killed a grand total of 10 people in the bible, while god killed somewhere around 2.3 million

he understands human nature, but doesn't judge you for being human

he accepts gods unwanted children unconditionally and still the devil is the evil one? why?

because Satan is not our hero, he is a silent guardian a watchful protector

a Dark Knight.
 
2013-09-15 05:41:50 PM  
*sigh*

The Catholic Church does some wonderful things regarding social justice, and they're at least consistent in their views on the sanctity of human life (unlike republicans) but every now and again they unleash a truly stupid spokesman. It usually looks a lot like this.
 
2013-09-15 05:42:09 PM  
What are three things that I didn't put on the expense account from last week's trip?
 
2013-09-15 05:43:50 PM  

speckio45: the devil gave humans critical thinking, which god didn't want. God  wanted us to not eat from the tree of knowledge so we could basically be thoughtless slaves for eternity, the the devil did us a favor and turned the tables with a single conversation.

also the devil killed a grand total of 10 people in the bible, while god killed somewhere around 2.3 million

he understands human nature, but doesn't judge you for being human

he accepts gods unwanted children unconditionally and still the devil is the evil one? why?

because Satan is not our hero, he is a silent guardian a watchful protector

a Dark Knight.


He also puts your balls in a deep fryer for all eternity. So there's that.
 
2013-09-15 05:45:45 PM  
Poopspasm: speckio45: the devil gave humans critical thinking, which god didn't want. God  wanted us to not eat from the tree of knowledge so we could basically be thoughtless slaves for eternity, the the devil did us a favor and turned the tables with a single conversation.

also the devil killed a grand total of 10 people in the bible, while god killed somewhere around 2.3 million

he understands human nature, but doesn't judge you for being human

he accepts gods unwanted children unconditionally and still the devil is the evil one? why?

because Satan is not our hero, he is a silent guardian a watchful protector

a Dark Knight.


He also puts your balls in a deep fryer for all eternity. So there's that.


Offensive PR from the GodSquad, is all.. wait, you really bought the whole "torture for eternity" thing? Lol!

/First round of Pina Coladas on me
//Window Seat
 
2013-09-15 05:48:06 PM  

Rann Xerox: FTA: Fornicators beware: sodomy, condoms and pornography are the work of the devil.
That's the message of a speech posted online last week by the Catholic Archbishop of St. Paul and Minnesota, John C. Niendstedt.

Next:  the Archbishop will add rum and the lash to the list.


Okay, Huffpost, let's review a little geography. Minnesota is the whole state. Minneapolis is the twin city to Saint Paul and the "other half" of the archdiocese.

/We now return to the regularly scheduled Farkery.
 
2013-09-15 05:48:41 PM  
Don't worry, it won't be long until Pope Frank sends the guys with the Comfy Chair to adjust his attitude.
 
2013-09-15 05:49:12 PM  
Well, I guess he just isn't Pope material.
 
2013-09-15 05:49:27 PM  

Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...


...in ADDITION to sodomy, condoms, and porn?!?

Is there a sign-up sheet? I'm so in.
 
2013-09-15 05:52:11 PM  
Sodomy, condoms and porn...is it time for the GOP convention already?
 
2013-09-15 05:52:28 PM  
Lots of people don't like condoms in their gay porn but I'm surprised an archbishop would be this vocal about it.
 
2013-09-15 05:52:29 PM  

Poopspasm: speckio45: the devil gave humans critical thinking, which god didn't want. God  wanted us to not eat from the tree of knowledge so we could basically be thoughtless slaves for eternity, the the devil did us a favor and turned the tables with a single conversation.

also the devil killed a grand total of 10 people in the bible, while god killed somewhere around 2.3 million

he understands human nature, but doesn't judge you for being human

he accepts gods unwanted children unconditionally and still the devil is the evil one? why?

because Satan is not our hero, he is a silent guardian a watchful protector

a Dark Knight.

He also puts your balls in a deep fryer for all eternity. So there's that.


Because he's the Adversary humanity deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll exorcise him. Because he can take it.
 
2013-09-15 05:55:00 PM  
This Satan guy sounds like my kinda guy.
 
2013-09-15 05:55:46 PM  
"I write to inform you that the teaching of the Catholic Church on homosexuality, as described in paragraphs 2357 and 2358 and 2359 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church is rooted in Scripture and based on the Natural Moral Law,"

Well, there's your problem...
 
2013-09-15 05:57:46 PM  
I only look at those photos of hot, shirtless Jesus for my personal sexual gratification, and surely that doesn't count as porn.
 
2013-09-15 05:58:31 PM  
Satan was invented by John Milton.  Maybe he needs to be worshiping a different God.
 
2013-09-15 06:07:30 PM  
I'll fark my wife in the ass tonight, while watching porn, in honor of this guy but there is no chance in hell I'll be wearing a condom.
 
2013-09-15 06:16:36 PM  
is this the homosexual-atheist circle-jerk thread?

ain't no cleaning them bed sheets, dude, they'll need burning
 
2013-09-15 06:18:24 PM  

chitownmike: I'll fark my wife in the ass tonight, while watching porn, in honor of this guy but there is no chance in hell I'll be wearing a condom.


You could wear a condom like a shower cap and go for the magic number.
 
2013-09-15 06:21:30 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: Sodomy, abortion, contraception, pornography, the redefinition of marriage, and the denial of objective truth are just some of the forces threatening the stability of our civilization. The source of these machinations is none other than the Father of Lies.
 

Raping little kids still OK, though.


Nothing like a little immorality to justify immorality.  Add another one and keep farking that chicken.
 
2013-09-15 06:22:36 PM  
It's hard for me to grasp that so many people are stupid enough to align themselves with beliefs such as are espoused by this asshole.

Are people REALLY that stupid?

It's mind-boggling.
 
2013-09-15 06:23:06 PM  

clowncar on fire: Benevolent Misanthrope: Sodomy, abortion, contraception, pornography, the redefinition of marriage, and the denial of objective truth are just some of the forces threatening the stability of our civilization. The source of these machinations is none other than the Father of Lies.
 

Raping little kids still OK, though.

Nothing like a little immorality to justify immorality.  Add another one and keep farking that chicken.


But don't use a condom, 'cause that would be wrong.
 
2013-09-15 06:23:26 PM  

Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...


And Dungeons and Dragons.  That's another one.
 
2013-09-15 06:23:46 PM  
Minnesota Archbishop

Aaaand that's where I stopped reading.
 
2013-09-15 06:24:24 PM  

clowncar on fire: Benevolent Misanthrope: Sodomy, abortion, contraception, pornography, the redefinition of marriage, and the denial of objective truth are just some of the forces threatening the stability of our civilization. The source of these machinations is none other than the Father of Lies.
 

Raping little kids still OK, though.

Nothing like a little immorality to justify immorality.  Add another one and keep farking that chicken.


So you agree with him.  Good to know.

Now fark off.
 
2013-09-15 06:25:34 PM  

eyeq360: Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...

And Dungeons and Dragons.  That's another one.


And the old Procter & Gamble symbol.

static5.businessinsider.com
 
2013-09-15 06:27:19 PM  

DrSansabeltNoShiatSlacks: While the Catholics suck the young boy's penis............ Hmmmmmmmmmmm.


That's just it, condoms ruin the moment during fellatio.
 
2013-09-15 06:27:30 PM  

fusillade762: eyeq360: Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...

And Dungeons and Dragons.  That's another one.

And the old Procter & Gamble symbol.

[static5.businessinsider.com image 263x317]


You missed the 13 stars
 
2013-09-15 06:28:12 PM  
Typical Fark reaction to this guys statements. It is obvious no one here thought this through.
The key thing is these homosexual people want to get married. So if they can't marry someone of the same sex they will think "I have got to get married, I guess I will have to go straight and get married. Once married as a heterosexual naturally they will quickly come to the conclusion that "This straight life style is so natural and perfect I just didn't realize, I better give up condoms and any other birth control too." So after they have had five or six kids they will think "I just love having a child born every year. They are truly wonderful and a blessing. Since clearly these blessing are from God,  I must join the Catholic Church since that enlightened archbishop who changed my life so much is a member. And I better give up sodomy too. [Sodomy is always the last to go since it feels so damned good.]
So think things out people.
 
2013-09-15 06:28:27 PM  
And Madonna's Superbowl half-time show:

2.bp.blogspot.com

Satanic Ritual Performed at The NFL Half Time Show

Be sure to put your crazy pants on before clicking that link.
 
2013-09-15 06:29:43 PM  
Here's hoping the cool new pope smacks this asshole down.
 
2013-09-15 06:31:27 PM  

speckio45: the devil gave humans critical thinking, which god didn't want. God  wanted us to not eat from the tree of knowledge so we could basically be thoughtless slaves for eternity, the the devil did us a favor and turned the tables with a single conversation.



Lucifer, indeed.
 
2013-09-15 06:31:46 PM  
And from his boss, "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?"

These idiots are not long for the Church. Thank God.
 
2013-09-15 06:32:01 PM  
You know this guy's browsing history would make the most hardcore leather bottom blush.

We just had the thread about the guy porking kids to "cure" teh ghey, and there's WAY too many shuffle-a-priest stories out there.

Once again, the question is asked: How do people continue to justify the Church holding a moral authority over someone's immortal soul, when they continue to condone stuff like that?

Still waiting for Francis to step up on this issue.
 
2013-09-15 06:33:12 PM  
What does the bishop say about cross-dressers?
s24.postimg.org
"the DEVIL made me do it!"
 
2013-09-15 06:34:35 PM  

clowncar on fire: fusillade762: eyeq360: Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...

And Dungeons and Dragons.  That's another one.

And the old Procter & Gamble symbol.

[static5.businessinsider.com image 263x317]

You missed the 13 stars


mrnussbaum.com

As Americans, we were destined for ruination anyhow.
 
2013-09-15 06:36:43 PM  

common sense is an oxymoron: speckio45: the devil gave humans critical thinking, which god didn't want. God  wanted us to not eat from the tree of knowledge so we could basically be thoughtless slaves for eternity, the the devil did us a favor and turned the tables with a single conversation.


Lucifer, indeed.


Actually, the choice was live in bliss or fall from grace and figure it all out your self.
 
2013-09-15 06:37:28 PM  
Ah yes, Satan, the all-time greatest, imaginary scapegoat for human personal responsibility.
 
2013-09-15 06:38:09 PM  

Chinchillazilla: Here's hoping the cool new pope smacks this asshole down.


That sounds suspiciously like sodomy.
 
2013-09-15 06:39:27 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Chinchillazilla: Here's hoping the cool new pope smacks this asshole down.

That sounds suspiciously like sodomy.


Here's hoping the cool new pope sodomizes this guy.
 
2013-09-15 06:40:02 PM  

houstondragon: You know this guy's browsing history would make the most hardcore leather bottom blush.

We just had the thread about the guy porking kids to "cure" teh ghey, and there's WAY too many shuffle-a-priest stories out there.

Once again, the question is asked: How do people continue to justify the Church holding a moral authority over someone's immortal soul, when they continue to condone stuff like that?

Still waiting for Francis to step up on this issue.


See his statement in the post immediately preceding yours. It's a start.
 
2013-09-15 06:40:05 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Ah yes, Satan, the all-time greatest, imaginary scapegoat for human personal responsibility.


Now that we're pushing for atheism, we'll have to settle on blaming our fellow man instead.

Are you that naïve to believe that it hasn't always been somebody else's fault right from the start?
 
2013-09-15 06:40:31 PM  

baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?


An intellectual fantasy indulged in by those trying to assert a moral high-ground in the face of evidence to the contrary.
 
2013-09-15 06:41:24 PM  

ChubbyTiger: And from his boss, "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?"

These idiots are not long for the Church. Thank God.


Um, you do realize that those statements are not contradictory, right?

The catechism says don't judge these immoral sick people.  That's what the pope said, too.

He's not going to change anything.  He'll just say it differently.
 
2013-09-15 06:43:18 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

An intellectual fantasy indulged in by those trying to assert a moral high-ground in the face of evidence to the contrary.


So in other words, "trolling".
 
2013-09-15 06:46:34 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: ChubbyTiger: And from his boss, "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?"

These idiots are not long for the Church. Thank God.

Um, you do realize that those statements are not contradictory, right?

The catechism says don't judge these immoral sick people.  That's what the pope said, too.

He's not going to change anything.  He'll just say it differently.


What were you expecting?

Saying that it is not man's place to cast judgement is not saying being gay is evil and God will sort them out later. It means it's not man's place to judge.  The pope reiterated that.
play victim much?
 
2013-09-15 06:53:55 PM  

baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?


A thing that some atheists deny exists, until they see someone doing something that they think is wrong.
 
2013-09-15 07:01:46 PM  

clowncar on fire: Benevolent Misanthrope: ChubbyTiger: And from his boss, "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?"

These idiots are not long for the Church. Thank God.

Um, you do realize that those statements are not contradictory, right?

The catechism says don't judge these immoral sick people.  That's what the pope said, too.

He's not going to change anything.  He'll just say it differently.

What were you expecting?


I was expecting that people would understand that he's more of the same, instead of eerybod falling all over themselves to talk about what a cool reforming radical he is.

I expected too much.
 
2013-09-15 07:02:10 PM  

clowncar on fire: Agent Smiths Laugh: Ah yes, Satan, the all-time greatest, imaginary scapegoat for human personal responsibility.

Now that we're pushing for atheism, we'll have to settle on blaming our fellow man instead.

Are you that naïve to believe that it hasn't always been somebody else's fault right from the start?


It's human nature to preserve itself, thus attempting to shift the blame, and therefore any repercussions, for wrong-doing to someone else. From that position, yes one could say we've been practicing the evasion of personal responsibility since always. The Satan concept is superbly accessible for that purpose. It's also a complete sham that doesn't actually absolve responsibility.

/ not saying anything that priest condemns is necessarily wrong-doing, I might add
// contrary to the opinion of some, morality is a subjective measurement, not an objective one
/// the closest it comes to objective is the codification of laws
 
2013-09-15 07:13:12 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: ChubbyTiger: And from his boss, "If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?"

These idiots are not long for the Church. Thank God.

Um, you do realize that those statements are not contradictory, right?

The catechism says don't judge these immoral sick people.  That's what the pope said, too.

He's not going to change anything.  He'll just say it differently.


Compare the two statements. Yes, they are different. Very different, I think, but I suppose we'll see in time.
 
2013-09-15 07:14:10 PM  
Good on him
 
2013-09-15 07:14:53 PM  

Son of Thunder: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

A thing that some atheists deny exists, until they see someone doing something that they think is wrong.


Funny how the "objective truth" that theists use to condemn someone "they see someone doing something that they think is wrong" changes from theist to theist.

Hmm, if only there was a word to describe something that changes depending on the observers perspective...
 
2013-09-15 07:21:10 PM  
You can take your sodomy and shove it up your ass!
 
2013-09-15 07:21:19 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: Sodomy, abortion, contraception, pornography, the redefinition of marriage, and the denial of objective truth are just some of the forces threatening the stability of our civilization. The source of these machinations is none other than the Father of Lies.
 

Raping little kids still OK, though.


denial of objective truth? Like denying that god is a delusion? That all morals are relative? That the bible is moral corrupt at best and completely immoral at worst? That either you are cherry picking the parts that you like in the bible or you are a lying whore?

Yah, I'll give him objective truth
 
2013-09-15 07:21:57 PM  
Just in from taking my teen-aged son and a bunch of his friends to Dallas Pride.  Gettin' a kick.  Also, BEST.SWAG. EVER. (though he gets all the cool condoms...latex allergy...blah, blah, blah...)

Oh, and FARK OFF, padre.
 
2013-09-15 07:22:24 PM  
The only thing I really question about losers who post this kind of self-aggrandizing bullshiat is how their childhood went.  You can just imagine these losers being introduced into the tightly-wound superreligious nonsense by having their mothers beat them up because the last episode of Dukes of Hazzard was somehow 'rebald' and such.  This sort of religious squealing always stems from someone being jealous of someone else's sexuality.

In fact, I'd like this asshole to be honest about it:  "I never got many women, I'm jealous, and I bought into the idea that I'm too old to go out and have some good honest sexual fun, and that is being transferred into my impotent rage of being a complete tool who can't break with some sad convention in the community I happened to be unlucky enough to be born in.'  To hell with all this Jesus flanking, Pastor....why don't you just be honest with yourself?
 
2013-09-15 07:23:02 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Son of Thunder: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

A thing that some atheists deny exists, until they see someone doing something that they think is wrong.

Funny how the "objective truth" that theists use to condemn someone "they see someone doing something that they think is wrong" changes from theist to theist.

Hmm, if only there was a word to describe something that changes depending on the observers perspective...


If morality is all a matter of perspective, then you have no grounds on which to criticize this archbishop, since what he says is true from his perspective.
 
2013-09-15 07:24:13 PM  

Son of Thunder: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

A thing that some atheists deny exists, until they see someone doing something that they think is wrong.


2+2 = 4
NaCl is Sodium and Cholrine in equal parts.
The bible is full of immoral acts by the both the profits and leaders and by god.

these are objective truths

/you reject this? explain abraham and isaac; lot and his daughters; and moses and the Midian virgin girls.
/yup immoral
 
2013-09-15 07:26:08 PM  
Why is this news? Isn't this obvious? Whether you agree with what he says or not, these are not new sins....

Don't get me wrong, I love me some sodomy, but why is this news? Do people really not know that Catholics and other Christians are against these things and that Satan is the reason for sin?

I am not a Catholic but this

"2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. "

Is absolutely right on. I don't care if you are Christian, Catholic, Muslim whatever, but if you claim to be of this religion accept it. God does not like gays. He destroyed entire cities because of it and other sin.

The churches that change their teachings based on popular opinion instead of what is outlined in whatever book they use is shameful.
 
2013-09-15 07:29:44 PM  
Released in this sodomy.
For one sweet moment I am whole!
 
2013-09-15 07:31:16 PM  

namatad: Son of Thunder: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

A thing that some atheists deny exists, until they see someone doing something that they think is wrong.

2+2 = 4
NaCl is Sodium and Cholrine in equal parts.
The bible is full of immoral acts by the both the profits and leaders and by god.

these are objective truths


Yeah, but is there any way to make a prophet off it?
 
2013-09-15 07:34:34 PM  
glarkware.com
 
2013-09-15 07:39:32 PM  

washingtonman: I don't care if you are Christian, Catholic, Muslim whatever, but if you claim to be of this religion accept it. God does not like gays. He destroyed entire cities because of it and other sin.


When did Westboro start trolling Fark?
 
2013-09-15 07:42:48 PM  
I know this is FARK and a balanced worldview is frowned upon, but these are the words of my local bishop. No, I am not a Catholic, but I do work for them and I am quite glad to have met this guy. Prior to meeting him I figured all Catholics were the crazy. Mostly, the bad crazy like the Bishop in the article, a few of the good ones crazy like Father Bob Maguire. It is good to know that there are some sane ones too.
 
2013-09-15 07:44:56 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: washingtonman: I don't care if you are Christian, Catholic, Muslim whatever, but if you claim to be of this religion accept it. God does not like gays. He destroyed entire cities because of it and other sin.

When did Westboro start trolling Fark?


I am all for trolling Westboro, but you seem to be barking up the wrong tree. I am not affiliated with any religion nor do I abide by their religions guidelines, rules etc.

Also, please be aware that not all Catholics and Christians are Westboro, just like all Muslims are not terrorists.
 
2013-09-15 07:45:01 PM  

Son of Thunder: Agent Smiths Laugh: Son of Thunder: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

A thing that some atheists deny exists, until they see someone doing something that they think is wrong.

Funny how the "objective truth" that theists use to condemn someone "they see someone doing something that they think is wrong" changes from theist to theist.

Hmm, if only there was a word to describe something that changes depending on the observers perspective...

If morality is all a matter of perspective, then you have no grounds on which to criticize this archbishop, since what he says is true from his perspective.


Of course I can, because his views violate my own moral code, and therefore are worthy of criticism in my opinion.

Tell me this, if morality is objective, meaning there is one set of fundamental, universal moral standards established by the christian god, then why are there so many different denominations with their own interpretation of that moral standard?

You might answer, "Because we are flawed and fall short of god's moral standard, and just can't get it right."

That response would be erroneous because that would require that the thing exists and that someone at some point observed it, at least enough to attempt to quantify and practice it. But if that happened, where is the evidence of this encounter? Who was it, When was it? Where was it? Was any part of it accurately, demonstrably preserved for observation?

You might answer, "Jesus."

If, however, Jesus is the perfect example of morality, then why didn't he speak against slavery (largely condemned as immoral by both secular and nonsecular sources) or homosexuality (vocally condemned as immoral by many secular sources and even some secular sources)?

If he was the example of perfect morality, then why didn't he condemn those two "immoral" things?
 
2013-09-15 07:48:34 PM  
Condoms prevent abortions so:

Does this mean abortions are what God wants, so Satan invented condoms to piss off God?
 
2013-09-15 07:50:23 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Son of Thunder: Agent Smiths Laugh: Son of Thunder: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

A thing that some atheists deny exists, until they see someone doing something that they think is wrong.

Funny how the "objective truth" that theists use to condemn someone "they see someone doing something that they think is wrong" changes from theist to theist.

Hmm, if only there was a word to describe something that changes depending on the observers perspective...

If morality is all a matter of perspective, then you have no grounds on which to criticize this archbishop, since what he says is true from his perspective.

Of course I can, because his views violate my own moral code, and therefore are worthy of criticism in my opinion.

Tell me this, if morality is objective, meaning there is one set of fundamental, universal moral standards established by the christian god, then why are there so many different denominations with their own interpretation of that moral standard?

You might answer, "Because we are flawed and fall short of god's moral standard, and just can't get it right."

That response would be erroneous because that would require that the thing exists and that someone at some point observed it, at least enough to attempt to quantify and practice it. But if that happened, where is the evidence of this encounter? Who was it, When was it? Where was it? Was any part of it accurately, demonstrably preserved for observation?

You might answer, "Jesus."

If, however, Jesus is the perfect example of morality, then why didn't he speak against slavery (largely condemned as immoral by both secular and nonsecular sources) or homosexuality (vocally condemned as immoral by many secular sources and even some secular sources)?

If he was the example of perfect morality, then why didn't he condemn those two "immoral" things?


One interpretation of 'disciple' is 'slave'. There are many examples in history of people calling themselves 'slaves of Christ'.

As for slavery, we are all slaves. We just think we are free.
 
2013-09-15 07:50:25 PM  
From the Catechism:

2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex

" exclusive or predominant "
So does this mean every now and again is ok? Or am I reading it wrong?
 
2013-09-15 07:50:36 PM  
Attention all you religious people who don't agree with this hate: Leave these hate societies!!

Speak with your $$$ ... it is all they care about. Snake oil salesmen will change the flavor if you stop buying the current stuff.
 
2013-09-15 07:50:49 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Condoms prevent abortions so:

Does this mean abortions are what God wants, so Satan invented condoms to piss off God?


Well, maybe, he does seem to favor killing children.
 
2013-09-15 07:53:01 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Condoms prevent abortions so:

Does this mean abortions are what God wants, so Satan invented condoms to piss off God?

Well, maybe, he does seem to favor killing children.


If the result of "killing" is paradise for the kids who get off this miserable rock a little early, the killing of children is only immoral from our selfish perspective.
 
2013-09-15 07:57:55 PM  

Prophet of Loss: If he was the example of perfect morality, then why didn't he condemn those two "immoral" things?

One interpretation of 'disciple' is 'slave'. There are many examples in history of people calling themselves 'slaves of Christ'.

As for slavery, we are all slaves. We just think we are free.


Oh I'm well aware of the biblical interpretations of "servant" as it could be read as slave.

Problem is any interpretation that favors servant marginalizes slavery (especially with respect to obvious references to it in the bible), and any interpretation that favors slave demonstrates a god that is pro-slavery. A sticky position for christians.
 
2013-09-15 08:00:16 PM  

sweet-daddy-2: From the Catechism:

2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex

" exclusive or predominant "
So does this mean every now and again is ok? Or am I reading it wrong?


It means even if you're bi, you're gay.  Even if you think about it, you're gay.
 
2013-09-15 08:01:23 PM  

baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?


Use of this phrase is a demonstration that one's cerebral cortex has calcified; that one is no longer able to consider any other point of view, and, upon encountering one, has no intellectual alternative but to dismiss it as evil.
 
2013-09-15 08:02:52 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: If he was the example of perfect morality, then why didn't he condemn those two "immoral" things?

One interpretation of 'disciple' is 'slave'. There are many examples in history of people calling themselves 'slaves of Christ'.

As for slavery, we are all slaves. We just think we are free.

Oh I'm well aware of the biblical interpretations of "servant" as it could be read as slave.

Problem is any interpretation that favors servant marginalizes slavery (especially with respect to obvious references to it in the bible), and any interpretation that favors slave demonstrates a god that is pro-slavery. A sticky position for christians.


Again, you are a slave in many ways even though you think you are free. Are living the life you would choose? If the barriers erected to prevent you from rising from your station were removed would you continue to live as you do now?
 
2013-09-15 08:03:31 PM  

baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?


It's a dogwhistle term for "Vatican 2 and all other reforms or changes were and are wrong" much used on the authoritarian right wing of the Roman Catholic Church.
 
2013-09-15 08:04:34 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Condoms prevent abortions so:

Does this mean abortions are what God wants, so Satan invented condoms to piss off God?

Well, maybe, he does seem to favor killing children.

If the result of "killing" is paradise for the kids who get off this miserable rock a little early, the killing of children is only immoral from our selfish perspective.


A chilling concept that, sadly, some people have actually acted upon. Doubly so in light of the inability to empirically demonstrate that there is any better destination for the lives of those children.
 
2013-09-15 08:07:21 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: If he was the example of perfect morality, then why didn't he condemn those two "immoral" things?

One interpretation of 'disciple' is 'slave'. There are many examples in history of people calling themselves 'slaves of Christ'.

As for slavery, we are all slaves. We just think we are free.

Oh I'm well aware of the biblical interpretations of "servant" as it could be read as slave.

Problem is any interpretation that favors servant marginalizes slavery (especially with respect to obvious references to it in the bible), and any interpretation that favors slave demonstrates a god that is pro-slavery. A sticky position for christians.

Again, you are a slave in many ways even though you think you are free. Are living the life you would choose? If the barriers erected to prevent you from rising from your station were removed would you continue to live as you do now?


You'll have to be more specific than that. To which forms of prospective slavery do you refer?

/as an aside, the slavery I was speaking of was the owning, as property and labor, of one human being by another
 
2013-09-15 08:08:10 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Condoms prevent abortions so:

Does this mean abortions are what God wants, so Satan invented condoms to piss off God?

Well, maybe, he does seem to favor killing children.

If the result of "killing" is paradise for the kids who get off this miserable rock a little early, the killing of children is only immoral from our selfish perspective.

A chilling concept that, sadly, some people have actually acted upon. Doubly so in light of the inability to empirically demonstrate that there is any better destination for the lives of those children.


It depends of your perspective. If there is a God then their quick execution may have prevented a long slow starvation or abuse. If there's not, killing them probably prevented a long slow starvation or abuse.

Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.
 
2013-09-15 08:18:03 PM  
Some people ask me what problem do I have with organized religion. THIS.
 
2013-09-15 08:26:51 PM  

clowncar on fire: clowncar on fire: fusillade762: eyeq360: Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...

And Dungeons and Dragons.  That's another one.

And the old Procter & Gamble symbol.

[static5.businessinsider.com image 263x317]

You missed the 13 stars

[mrnussbaum.com image 320x220]

As Americans, we were destined for ruination anyhow.


Yikes, that map gave me a headache...it shows 14 colonies.  Maine wasn't one of the original 13...it was part of Massachusetts until 1820
 
2013-09-15 08:30:55 PM  

fusillade762: And Madonna's Superbowl half-time show:

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 640x449]

Satanic Ritual Performed at The NFL Half Time Show

Be sure to put your crazy pants on before clicking that link.


You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.
 
2013-09-15 08:31:00 PM  
I'm okay with this.
 
2013-09-15 08:43:52 PM  

Mambo Bananapatch: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

Use of this phrase is a demonstration that one's cerebral cortex has calcified; that one is no longer able to consider any other point of view, and, upon encountering one, has no intellectual alternative but to dismiss it as evil.


For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."

I might go further and suggest it's a tactic of desperation when you KNOW that there are people who don't agree with you and you also know that you don't really have a convincing argument for why they should accept your position.
 
2013-09-15 08:45:44 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.


Well, that's okay then. Carry on.
 
2013-09-15 08:47:08 PM  
Well, bless your heart, you try so  very hard.
 
2013-09-15 08:54:00 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.


No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.
 
2013-09-15 08:57:56 PM  
"Raping little kids still OK, though"

No, Misanthrope. Homosexual pedophiles are not ok, whether they wear a coach's uniform or any other.
 
2013-09-15 08:59:56 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.


Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.
 
2013-09-15 09:01:07 PM  

ciberido: You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.


Go on...

ciberido: For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."


The Tao that can be spoken is not the holy Tao.
 
2013-09-15 09:06:45 PM  

Kurmudgeon: "Raping little kids still OK, though"

No, Misanthrope. Homosexual pedophiles are not ok, whether they wear a coach's uniform or any other.


So why does the Catholic Church shuffle priests who rape kids around, instead of prosecuting them under the law?
 
2013-09-15 09:08:51 PM  

Kurmudgeon: "Raping little kids still OK, though"

No, Misanthrope. Homosexual pedophiles are not ok, whether they wear a coach's uniform or any other.


Um.


So you do know that adults that do sexual things to children...even when the adult and child are the same gender... are pedophiles, right? Not homosexual.

Just making sure you're not having a stroke.
 
2013-09-15 09:10:44 PM  

tinfoil-hat maggie: ciberido: You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.

Go on...

ciberido: For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."

The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.


FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.
 
2013-09-15 09:12:46 PM  
Also, I heard there would be tacos.
 
2013-09-15 09:13:14 PM  
Sodomy, condoms and porn - oh, my

What is "The 2016 Presidential elections"

I'll take "things requiring citizens to bend over" for 800, Alex.
 
2013-09-15 09:16:09 PM  

megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.


You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards
 
2013-09-15 09:18:10 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards


Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!
 
2013-09-15 09:19:23 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: tinfoil-hat maggie: ciberido: You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.

Go on...

ciberido: For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."

The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.

FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.


Don't tell anyone about my love of eating unholy tacos.
 
2013-09-15 09:19:26 PM  

megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!


Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.
 
2013-09-15 09:19:36 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.

FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.


Lulz, with the amount of hero and derp in this thread, tacos most appropriate : )
 
2013-09-15 09:21:33 PM  

tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.

FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.

Lulz, with the amount of herop and derp in this thread, tacos are most appropriate : )


/FTFM
 
2013-09-15 09:21:33 PM  

the_chief: You can take your sodomy and shove it up your ass!


From Merriam-Webster:

Sodomy: anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex; also :  copulation with an animal.

Just in case you didn't know it means more than butt-sex.

/though an amusing turn of phrase you had, I'll give you that
 
2013-09-15 09:22:54 PM  
Denial of objective truth?

Seriously?

What colour is the sky in his world?
 
2013-09-15 09:23:12 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.


Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.
 
2013-09-15 09:23:23 PM  
Threadjack by tacos. I like it.
 
2013-09-15 09:24:52 PM  

Mrtraveler01: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.


I like giving Megarian ammo to work with. She's fun.

/certainly a better sport than some
//I know she's not going to sleep with me, shut up
 
2013-09-15 09:26:21 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.


It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
t.qkme.me
 
2013-09-15 09:29:22 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Mrtraveler01: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.

I like giving Megarian ammo to work with. She's fun.

/certainly a better sport than some
//I know she's not going to sleep with me, shut up


Yeah, I like someone with a sense of humor too.
 
2013-09-15 09:30:18 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.


Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?
 
2013-09-15 09:30:57 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: sweet-daddy-2: From the Catechism:

2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex

" exclusive or predominant "
So does this mean every now and again is ok? Or am I reading it wrong?

It means even if you're bi, you're gay.  Even if you think about it, you're gay.


Well. There goes Thursday nights at the Elks.
 
2013-09-15 09:31:50 PM  
There reaches a point where there's no sense trying to reason with these people anymore and you just have to say...

i.qkme.me
 
2013-09-15 09:33:59 PM  

tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]


Well hell, it's on now!

img.fark.net

/clicky for tacos
 
2013-09-15 09:36:07 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]

Well hell, it's on now!



/clicky for tacos


HOTSAUCE AND SODOMY ON ALL THE THINGS!
 
2013-09-15 09:37:15 PM  

megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!


That would be more like fish tacos. You can make 'em up lickety-split.
 
2013-09-15 09:38:04 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Mrtraveler01: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.

I like giving Megarian ammo to work with. She's fun.

/certainly a better sport than some
//I know she's not going to sleep with me, shut up


I hope you like Cake and Sodomy.

/*shrug* I don't get to use Marilyn Manson quotes very often
//any port in the storm
 
2013-09-15 09:38:31 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?


Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.
 
2013-09-15 09:39:43 PM  

megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]

Well hell, it's on now!

/clicky for tacos

HOTSAUCE AND SODOMY ON ALL THE THINGS!



i7.photobucket.com
 
2013-09-15 09:40:18 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

That would be more like fish tacos. You can make 'em up lickety-split.


omg omg omg fish tacos with shredded cabbage omg omg omg

I would eat those tacos so hard.

Wait...
 
2013-09-15 09:40:55 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?


Also, I know you don't like religious people, but who is the one pointing fingers and calling names? If you going says your champion rationality, you can at least provide a rational argument without the sophomoric barbs.
 
2013-09-15 09:41:58 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.


You misspelled it, besides, what exercise? Whether not a positive argument can be made for child slaying, biblical or otherwise?

A very peculiar tangent to take.
 
2013-09-15 09:43:06 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.


Would you guys quit trying to go back to the topic. Some of us are trying to have a serious discussion about tinfoil-hat maggie's tacos.

And megarian brought cake. And sodomy.
 
2013-09-15 09:44:02 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.

You misspelled it, besides, what exercise? Whether not a positive argument can be made for child slaying, biblical or otherwise?

A very peculiar tangent to take.


Whatever man. Shouldn't you be over at 4chan?

This thread is about tacos.
 
2013-09-15 09:44:30 PM  

megarian: Danger Avoid Death: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

That would be more like fish tacos. You can make 'em up lickety-split.

omg omg omg fish tacos with shredded cabbage omg omg omg

I would eat those tacos so hard.

Wait...


No. Go on. Please.
 
2013-09-15 09:46:45 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: megarian: Danger Avoid Death: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

That would be more like fish tacos. You can make 'em up lickety-split.

omg omg omg fish tacos with shredded cabbage omg omg omg

I would eat those tacos so hard.

Wait...

No. Go on. Please.


Someone brought taco cake or something.

I forgot the topic.
 
2013-09-15 09:47:14 PM  

megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]

Well hell, it's on now!

/clicky for tacos

HOTSAUCE AND SODOMY ON ALL THE THINGS!


Thomas Dolby - Hot Sauce

/smother me in your hot sauce, woman till smoke come from your thighs.
 
2013-09-15 09:48:13 PM  

Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Also, I know you don't like religious people, but who is the one pointing fingers and calling names? If you going says your champion rationality, you can at least provide a rational argument without the sophomoric barbs.


I used to be one of them, so I understand their point of view better than you might suspect.

/and the Krueger comment was intended as humor
//I'm fully aware one doesn't use insults to make logical points, they are emotive, not rational
 
2013-09-15 09:52:04 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Would you guys quit trying to go back to the topic. Some of us are trying to have a serious discussion about tinfoil-hat maggie's tacos.

And megarian brought cake. And sodomy.


It's true but I'm pretty sure the cake is a lie. It could be possible their out of cake. Any way. I like sodomy and tacos ; )
memegenerador.com
 
2013-09-15 09:52:05 PM  

fusillade762: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: Threadjack by tacos. I like it.

It reminds me of all the threads from the last election.
[t.qkme.me image 310x232]

Well hell, it's on now!

/clicky for tacos

HOTSAUCE AND SODOMY ON ALL THE THINGS!

Thomas Dolby - Hot Sauce

/smother me in your hot sauce, woman till smoke come from your thighs.


Wow.

Relevant and hilarious.

+10 points
 
2013-09-15 09:52:08 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Would you guys quit trying to go back to the topic. Some of us are trying to have a serious discussion about tinfoil-hat maggie's tacos.

And megarian brought cake. And sodomy.


You make an excellent point.

megarian: Someone brought taco cake or something.

I forgot the topic.


Oh I rather think you just established it.
 
2013-09-15 09:54:22 PM  

Rann Xerox: Next:  the Archbishop will add rum and the lash to the list.


Came for this, but you beat me to it.

Damn, it really sounds dirty no matter how you arrange the words.
 
2013-09-15 09:56:04 PM  
Ya know, he could be right.......
 
2013-09-15 10:02:53 PM  

sobriquet by any other name: and i'm wondering (aren't you?) just how wide their "stridently anti-gay stance" is...  wide enough, say, for a camel to pass through?

/OH MY!


Or s FIST!?!?!

/with plenty of lube of course
 
2013-09-15 10:05:01 PM  

megarian: Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...

...in ADDITION to sodomy, condoms, and porn?!?

Is there a sign-up sheet? I'm so in.


Once again we see that Satan is responsible for everything right and good in the world.
 
2013-09-15 10:07:14 PM  

DownDaRiver: Ya know, he could be right.......


Assuming for a moment that Satan existed, wouldn't be a case for Satan being a proponent of safe sex by way of condoms (and, of course, some forms of sodomy and porn)?

Doesn't that put the god camp on the wrong side of that issue (and thus having a position that encourages unwanted children and/or venereal disease)?

So:

Satan = wants you to have fun, and be safe about it
God = you pays your money, you takes your chances
 
2013-09-15 10:08:05 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: DownDaRiver: Ya know, he could be right.......

Assuming for a moment that Satan existed, wouldn't it be a case for Satan being a proponent of safe sex by way of condoms (and, of course, some forms of sodomy and porn)?

Doesn't that put the god camp on the wrong side of that issue (and thus having a position that encourages unwanted children and/or venereal disease)?

So:

Satan = wants you to have fun, and be safe about it
God = you pays your money, you takes your chances


Fixed for clarity.
 
2013-09-15 10:08:57 PM  
Tacos?

thumbs.dreamstime.com

Protip: Eat tacos over a tortilla. That way, when some of the filling falls out, BOOM! More tacos.
 
2013-09-15 10:10:34 PM  

ReverendJimBobHammer: megarian: Because People in power are Stupid: And motorcycles and rock and roll and blacks and nunchucks and chuck taylors and red hair and big boobs and ...

...in ADDITION to sodomy, condoms, and porn?!?

Is there a sign-up sheet? I'm so in.

Once again we see that Satan is responsible for everything right and good in the world.


I farking love satin.
 
2013-09-15 10:19:00 PM  

HawgWild: Tacos?



Protip: Eat tacos over a tortilla. That way, when some of the filling falls out, BOOM! More tacos.


That's a great idea
Why didn't I think of that
 
2013-09-15 10:24:26 PM  

DownDaRiver: HawgWild: Tacos?



Protip: Eat tacos over a tortilla. That way, when some of the filling falls out, BOOM! More tacos.

That's a great idea
Why didn't I think of that


My world is a little happier because of this information.
 
2013-09-15 10:24:29 PM  

Son of Thunder: baka-san: What the hell is "objective truth"?

A thing that some atheists deny exists, until they see someone doing something that they think is wrong.


That would be 'subjective' truth, since it is the Atheist's beliefs that inform their idea of 'right' and 'wrong'


/English mofo, do you speak it?
 
2013-09-15 10:26:18 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: tinfoil-hat maggie: ciberido: You can't fool me.  I always take my pants off for crazy time.

Go on...

ciberido: For a long time I've been saying (and I'm sure others have as well), that the more a philosophy asserts in its very name for itself that it is the most logical, reasonable, or self-evidently correct position, the more likely it is to be completely wrong.  Two of my favorite examples are "Scientology" and "Objectivism."

I suspect the same often applies to "natural law" and "objective truth."

The Taco that can be spoken is not the holy Taco.

FTFY. You left out the c's.

/you're welcome.
//Now I want a taco.


www.horsenation.com
 
2013-09-15 10:27:46 PM  

HawgWild: Tacos?

[thumbs.dreamstime.com image 227x142]

Protip: Eat tacos over a tortilla. That way, when some of the filling falls out, BOOM! More tacos.


userserve-ak.last.fm
 
2013-09-15 10:30:23 PM  

megarian: DownDaRiver: HawgWild: Tacos?

Protip: Eat tacos over a tortilla. That way, when some of the filling falls out, BOOM! More tacos.

That's a great idea
Why didn't I think of that

My world is a little happier because of this information.


I do what I can ...
 
2013-09-15 10:33:01 PM  

HawgWild: megarian: DownDaRiver: HawgWild: Tacos?

Protip: Eat tacos over a tortilla. That way, when some of the filling falls out, BOOM! More tacos.

That's a great idea
Why didn't I think of that

My world is a little happier because of this information.

I do what I can ...


The Dalai Lama would be proud

/now I'm hungry...
 
2013-09-15 10:33:04 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: Mrtraveler01: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.

I like giving Megarian ammo to work with. She's fun.

/certainly a better sport than some
//I know she's not going to sleep with me, shut up


She may not butt if it is sodomy you want just bend over and lube up, I'm coming in hard and fast.
 
2013-09-15 10:34:22 PM  

HawgWild: Tacos?

[thumbs.dreamstime.com image 227x142]

Protip: Eat tacos over a tortilla. That way, when some of the filling falls out, BOOM! More tacos.


That's...that's...

blogs.hpedsb.on.ca
 
2013-09-15 10:36:07 PM  

PocketfullaSass: Just in from taking my teen-aged son and a bunch of his friends to Dallas Pride.  Gettin' a kick.  Also, BEST.SWAG. EVER. (though he gets all the cool condoms...latex allergy...blah, blah, blah...)

Oh, and FARK OFF, padre.


You don't know me from Adam or Steve, but I think you kick ass.  Your son is a lucky kid to have you as his father.
 
2013-09-15 10:39:15 PM  

Otto's_Jacket: PocketfullaSass: Just in from taking my teen-aged son and a bunch of his friends to Dallas Pride.  Gettin' a kick.  Also, BEST.SWAG. EVER. (though he gets all the cool condoms...latex allergy...blah, blah, blah...)

Oh, and FARK OFF, padre.

You don't know me from Adam or Steve, but I think you kick ass.  Your son is a lucky kid to have you as his father.



Sorry, I meant mother...doesn't change a thing about what I said though!
 
2013-09-15 10:39:38 PM  

ReverendJimBobHammer: Agent Smiths Laugh: Mrtraveler01: megarian: Agent Smiths Laugh: megarian: Also, I heard there would be tacos.

You just want to munch some.

If you know what I mean, and I think you do.

/okay, that was bad even by my standards

Well duh! They're delicious! And I love hot sauc-

Oh. OH! Like vagina!!!

Oh good, glad I'm not the only one that thought that.

I like giving Megarian ammo to work with. She's fun.

/certainly a better sport than some
//I know she's not going to sleep with me, shut up

She may not butt if it is sodomy you want just bend over and lube up, I'm coming in hard and fast.


I prefer the oral sodomy, from the females, but thanks for the sentiment.

/at least it wasn't

i.chzbgr.com

but more

 memestorage.com
 
2013-09-15 10:55:29 PM  

Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.

Would you guys quit trying to go back to the topic. Some of us are trying to have a serious discussion about tinfoil-hat maggie's tacos.

And megarian brought cake. And sodomy.


So why hasn't anyone offered me a slice of sodomy cake yet?
 
2013-09-15 11:06:11 PM  

ciberido: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Agent Smiths Laugh: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Danger Avoid Death: Prophet of Loss: Most of the child killing in the Bible was done in times of war against enemy peoples.

Well, that's okay then. Carry on.

No one said its "ok". But, it was the "norm" of warfare at the time. The Jews could have enslaved them I guess or maybe raped them first like their contemporaries of the time.

The Bible does actually speak against child killing. Specifically, the burning of live children in fire to the God Molech as practiced by their neighbors.

Yeah, because the killing of children is definitely not okay when it's done in the name of somebody else's God.

As Lewis Black said, the Old Testament God is kind of a prick.

Well, if I was forced with the horrible task of choosing a death for my child I would rather a quick death at the sword them being burned alive. If Moloch is the alternative, I'll take the Old Testament Prick God any day.

Or you could, you know, try to prevent said child's death with everything at your disposal like a sane, rational person.

/and yet, here you are, making apologetics for infanticide/filicide
//your last name isn't Krueger by any chance is it?

Of course. Personally, I would offer my own life. But, this is a thought exercise. Your subtle appeal to ad-homiem not withstanding.

Would you guys quit trying to go back to the topic. Some of us are trying to have a serious discussion about tinfoil-hat maggie's tacos.

And megarian brought cake. And sodomy.

So why hasn't anyone offered me a slice of sodomy cake yet?


Huh. Thought was a taco cake.

...explains why it tasted like sweat and shame.
 
2013-09-15 11:16:22 PM  

Martian_Astronomer: "I write to inform you that the teaching of the Catholic Church on homosexuality, as described in paragraphs 2357 and 2358 and 2359 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church is rooted in Scripture and based on the Natural Moral Law,"

Well, there's your problem...


What, pray tell, is the Natural Moral Law? So far as I can tell, Nature is amoral. Not immoral, just amoral. So, can someone please clarify?!
 
2013-09-15 11:20:19 PM  

Deedeemarz: Martian_Astronomer: "I write to inform you that the teaching of the Catholic Church on homosexuality, as described in paragraphs 2357 and 2358 and 2359 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church is rooted in Scripture and based on the Natural Moral Law,"

Well, there's your problem...

What, pray tell, is the Natural Moral Law? So far as I can tell, Nature is amoral. Not immoral, just amoral. So, can someone please clarify?!


Natural Moral Law is derived from biology. Thus, it is acceptable for a wife to eat her mate during copulating, but it is totally unacceptable to substitute a big mac during the procedure, something that would never occur in God's natural and intelligent design.
 
2013-09-15 11:44:38 PM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: Reading further...


Fark you, assholes.  All of you.  Anyone who defends the Church or claims to be a Catholic.  This is what you support.

Except  that Catholocism talks about all sin like this meaning I'm no different, in the view of the catholic church, than the homosexual and therefore I should be treating homosexuals as I want to be treated because we're all  worthless sinners.
 
2013-09-15 11:47:44 PM  

Deedeemarz: Martian_Astronomer: "I write to inform you that the teaching of the Catholic Church on homosexuality, as described in paragraphs 2357 and 2358 and 2359 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church is rooted in Scripture and based on the Natural Moral Law,"

Well, there's your problem...

What, pray tell, is the Natural Moral Law? So far as I can tell, Nature is amoral. Not immoral, just amoral. So, can someone please clarify?!


Sure. Natural Moral Law is whatever the person invoking it says it is.

You're welcome.
 
2013-09-15 11:48:42 PM  

bigdanc: Benevolent Misanthrope: Reading further...

Fark you, assholes.  All of you.  Anyone who defends the Church or claims to be a Catholic.  This is what you support.

Except  that Catholocism talks about all sin like this meaning I'm no different, in the view of the catholic church, than the homosexual and therefore I should be treating homosexuals as I want to be treated because we're all  worthless sinners.


except (your wording) that i don't hear them going on about preventing "sinner marriage", do you? that's a worthless analysis on your part.
 
2013-09-16 12:11:29 AM  
"So why does the Catholic Church shuffle priests who rape kids around, instead of prosecuting them under the law?"
Hmm, perhaps they have higher ups in the church that are ok with this?
Maybe even additional pedophiles with their own little sins they'd rather not have uncovered?

"So you do know that adults that do sexual things to children...even when the adult and child are the same gender... are pedophiles, right? Not homosexual. Just making sure you're not having a stroke."

No no, nothing like that. Homosexual pedophiles prefer victims of their own gender, while heterosexual pedophiles prefer the opposite. The damage both do is the same. However, for political correctness sake, no one wants to see which is more common. If you ignore a criminal's preferences, then you ignore the one thing that may make them easier to apprehend....as well as understand.
However, just from seeing the reactions, some find their sacred cows and preferences more important than the safety of children.
 
2013-09-16 12:13:14 AM  
wow... this guys is numbing my brain... I try to pay attention, so listen to his statements, and comprehend them so that i may later rip them apart, but the language and flow seems designed to zone me out, so I will just take his word for it. you think they get taught to teach like that in seminary school..?

Phrozen
/no, seriously, it's farked the amount of effort I was putting into trying to listen to him.
 
2013-09-16 12:47:47 AM  

bigdanc: Except that Catholocism talks about all sin like this meaning I'm no different, in the view of the catholic church, than the homosexual and therefore I should be treating homosexuals as I want to be treated because we're all worthless sinners.


You're forgetting the part where they lobby for the reduction of rights for these particular sinners. They are hypocrites by your own words.
 
2013-09-16 12:57:58 AM  

sobriquet by any other name: except (your wording) that i don't hear them going on about preventing "sinner marriage", do you? that's a worthless analysis on your part.


Nope, because there is no implicit endorsement of sin in a heterosexual marriage.
 
2013-09-16 01:00:42 AM  

Farking Canuck: bigdanc: Except that Catholocism talks about all sin like this meaning I'm no different, in the view of the catholic church, than the homosexual and therefore I should be treating homosexuals as I want to be treated because we're all worthless sinners.

You're forgetting the part where they lobby for the reduction of rights for these particular sinners. They are hypocrites by your own words.


Proof?
 
2013-09-16 01:03:38 AM  

bigdanc: sobriquet by any other name: except (your wording) that i don't hear them going on about preventing "sinner marriage", do you? that's a worthless analysis on your part.

Nope, because there is no implicit endorsement of sin in a heterosexual marriage.


Oh, you're not a serious thinker. Allow me to cease reading that drivel...

...plonk
 
2013-09-16 01:10:00 AM  
This thread was a lot more fun when it was about tacos.
 
2013-09-16 01:15:32 AM  
s3-ec.buzzfed.com
 
2013-09-16 01:20:08 AM  
To wit:  Truly, Roundly, Ostracized for Lack of Love
 
2013-09-16 01:29:32 AM  

Danger Avoid Death: This thread was a lot more fun when it was about tacos.


Indeed, although I'm reading The Handmaid's Tale so it is scary and relevant in so many ways.
 
2013-09-16 01:46:34 AM  

tinfoil-hat maggie: Danger Avoid Death: This thread was a lot more fun when it was about tacos.

Indeed, although I'm reading The Handmaid's Tale so it is scary and relevant in so many ways.


Very good, albeit very disturbing book.

You might enjoy this, from Elmore Leonard's 10 Rules of Writing:

#9: Don't go into great detail describing places and things, unless you're Margaret Atwood and can paint scenes with language. You don't want descriptions that bring the action, the flow of the story, to a standstill.
 
2013-09-16 01:52:31 AM  
Teaching people that condoms are evil.  One more reason why should not merely tolerate religion, but we should actively work toward its abolition.
 
2013-09-16 01:54:30 AM  

The Southern Dandy: Teaching people that condoms are evil.  One more reason why should not merely tolerate religion, but we should actively work toward its abolition.


Yeah. Let's all pray to God for that day to come.
 
2013-09-16 01:57:09 AM  

Danger Avoid Death: You might enjoy this, from Elmore Leonard's 10 Rules of Writing:

#9: Don't go into great detail describing places and things, unless you're Margaret Atwood and can paint scenes with language. You don't want descriptions that bring the action, the flow of the story, to a standstill.


<sidebar>
Not to take us too far afield, here, but this is one of the things about George R. R. Martin's writing that I find terribly grating-the over-detailed descriptions of clothing and food. Not having these is the single best thing about the TV versions of the books.
</sidebar>

You may now return to your regularly-scheuduled thread about Catholic tacos or whatever it is...
 
2013-09-16 02:00:36 AM  

sobriquet by any other name: bigdanc: sobriquet by any other name: except (your wording) that i don't hear them going on about preventing "sinner marriage", do you? that's a worthless analysis on your part.

Nope, because there is no implicit endorsement of sin in a heterosexual marriage.

Oh, you're not a serious thinker. Allow me to cease reading that drivel...

...plonk


I'm not sure if you meant that or this and if that, what that?

...splat?
 
2013-09-16 02:40:16 AM  
Just watched the 1st season recap of "Parts Unknown" for the Sizzler visit again. Can't find a pic of the meatball guacamole taco, so this will have to do:

24.media.tumblr.com
 
2013-09-16 03:19:31 AM  
th07.deviantart.net


/the others I judged NSFW, and didn't post.
 
2013-09-16 05:17:31 AM  

sobriquet by any other name: Poopspasm: speckio45: the devil gave humans critical thinking, which god didn't want. God  wanted us to not eat from the tree of knowledge so we could basically be thoughtless slaves for eternity, the the devil did us a favor and turned the tables with a single conversation.

also the devil killed a grand total of 10 people in the bible, while god killed somewhere around 2.3 million

he understands human nature, but doesn't judge you for being human

he accepts gods unwanted children unconditionally and still the devil is the evil one? why?

because Satan is not our hero, he is a silent guardian a watchful protector

a Dark Knight.

He also puts your balls in a deep fryer for all eternity. So there's that.

Offensive PR from the GodSquad, is all.. wait, you really bought the whole "torture for eternity" thing? Lol!

/First round of Pina Coladas on me
//Window Seat


With our luck, the flight to hell will be held up at the TSA security line. And when, after a few years, you finally get to the scanner, you get randomly picked for a full-body cavity search with not merely fisting, but full-on arming. And when they find nothing, the loudspeaker announces that your flight was canceled. You pick up your new ticket and line up for the next flight's screening....
 
2013-09-16 06:44:43 AM  

Kurmudgeon: "So why does the Catholic Church shuffle priests who rape kids around, instead of prosecuting them under the law?"
Hmm, perhaps they have higher ups in the church that are ok with this?
Maybe even additional pedophiles with their own little sins they'd rather not have uncovered?

"So you do know that adults that do sexual things to children...even when the adult and child are the same gender... are pedophiles, right? Not homosexual. Just making sure you're not having a stroke."

No no, nothing like that. Homosexual pedophiles prefer victims of their own gender, while heterosexual pedophiles prefer the opposite. The damage both do is the same. However, for political correctness sake, no one wants to see which is more common. If you ignore a criminal's preferences, then you ignore the one thing that may make them easier to apprehend....as well as understand.
However, just from seeing the reactions, some find their sacred cows and preferences more important than the safety of children.



Wow.  It's interesting that you go on about "sacred cows" and "politically correct" and and "political correctness," all while asserting in broad strokes claims that clearly show you've never bothered to even do a simple Google search on the topic.  Why are you so worked-up emotionally over something you don't understand and clearly haven't bothered to read up on?
 
2013-09-16 09:17:49 AM  
A GIS for "holy taco" is somewhat interesting... Naked chicks, edible football stadiums, random weirdness, and this:

www.esquire.com
 
2013-09-16 10:15:40 AM  

Trance354: [th07.deviantart.net image 763x1046]


/the others I judged NSFW, and didn't post.


Well at least post a link.....

/TACO
 
2013-09-16 12:24:05 PM  
Get thee behind me Satan (but use a condom)! - Matthew 16:23
 
Displayed 201 of 201 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report