If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Atomic Scientists Bulletin)   In case you were wondering: How to Destroy Chemical Weapons   (thebulletin.org) divider line 15
    More: Interesting, chemical weapons, Chemical Weapons Convention, incinerators, chemical processes, palette, smokestacks, furnaces, upper stage  
•       •       •

1767 clicks; posted to Geek » on 13 Sep 2013 at 9:05 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



15 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2013-09-13 08:46:48 PM  
Bury them in a playground and shoot the witnesses?
 
2013-09-13 09:19:16 PM  
Tom Cruise Missiles?
 
2013-09-13 09:30:03 PM  

freak7: Tom Cruise Missiles?


. . . . powered by Suri.
 
2013-09-13 09:36:23 PM  
My guess: Lots of Heat.
FTA: First thing they did, rest were chemical based.
 
2013-09-13 10:36:36 PM  
.... Use them on your enemies?
 
2013-09-13 10:42:40 PM  
Nuclear weapons?
 
2013-09-13 11:42:49 PM  
Step 1: Test said weapons on NIMBYs that oppose efforts to destroy chemical stockpiles that are already in their backyard, or ones that aren't anywhere close to them.

/Even Johnston Atoll had NIMBY problems
 
2013-09-14 12:56:01 AM  
Put them on rockets and shoot them into space?

\And thus the problem was solved forever.
\\FOREVER I SAY!
 
2013-09-14 03:26:17 AM  

Thisbymaster: My guess: Lots of Heat.
FTA: First thing they did, rest were chemical based.


FIER!!!

Or oxidize the piss out of it.
 
2013-09-14 05:00:04 AM  
I guess chucking them into the ocean is no longer acceptable these days. It's not like sarin decomposes into an acid which can eat through the warhead it's stored in... Oh, right, well, the ocean is big I'm sure it's fine.
 
2013-09-14 07:33:13 AM  

cptjeff: Put them on rockets and shoot them into space?

\And thus the problem was solved forever.
\\FOREVER I SAY!


You've got to make sure it collides with a body that is completely without life... say... the moon, for example.  The NIMBY folks will piss and moan about new craters on the Earth-facing side, so just... toss 'em on the back.

The sun is better, but would require more fuel to reach.
 
2013-09-14 11:00:29 AM  
The Syrians are destroying their chemical weapons just the way I like...on each other.
 
2013-09-14 11:44:49 AM  

Korzine: I guess chucking them into the ocean is no longer acceptable these days. It's not like sarin decomposes into an acid which can eat through the warhead it's stored in... Oh, right, well, the ocean is big I'm sure it's fine.


I think it would be pretty cool for our ancestors thousand of years from now, after civilization has collapsed and been reborn, to find a stockpile of chemical weapons on the moon.   It would be worth it just for the WTF moment they would have... you know, for the lulz...
 
2013-09-14 11:45:58 AM  
wrong quote!!!!! bah....

/preview is my friend
 
2013-09-14 10:35:01 PM  

Maul555: wrong quote!!!!! bah....

/preview is my friend


Gas yourself. It's the only way to atone for your error.
 
Displayed 15 of 15 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report